[I. CALL TO ORDER]
[00:00:11]
I'D LIKE TO CALL THIS, UH, MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON WEDNESDAY, JULY 26TH TO ORDER.
UM, AND I HAVE A ROLL CALL, PLEASE.
AMANDA DENMARK, VICE CHAIRMAN CHARLIE WETMORE.
HERE, COMMISSIONER LYDIA DEPAUL.
HERE, COMMISSIONER MICHAEL BROCK HERE.
UM, WE RECOGNIZE THAT OUR CHAIR CAN'T BE HERE DUE TO A FAMILY ISSUE TONIGHT.
AND, UH, I ASK Y'ALL ON COMMISSION, HAVE A LITTLE BIT PATIENCE WITH ME AS THIS IS ONLY THE SECOND TIME I'VE EVER DONE THIS.
AND, UM, FOLKS OUT THERE AS WELL.
[III. NOTICE REGARDING ADJOURNMENT]
ALL, NOTICE REGARDING ADJOURNMENT.THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL NOT HEAR NEW ITEMS AFTER 9:30 PM UNLESS AUTHORIZED BY A MAJORITY VOTE OF THE COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT ITEMS WHICH HAVE NOT BEEN HEARD BEFORE 9:30 PM MAY BE CONTINUED TO THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING OR A SPECIAL MEETING DATE AS DETERMINED BY THE COMMISSION MEMBERS.
UM, NOTICE REGARDING PUBLIC COMMENTS.
EVERY MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC WHO IS RECOGNIZED TO SPEAK SHALL ADDRESS THE CHAIRMAN.
AND IN SPEAKING, AVOID DISRESPECT TO COMMISSION STAFF OR OTHER MEMBERS OF THE MEETING.
STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS WHEN SPEAKING FOR THE RECORD, COMMENTS ARE LIMITED TO A MAXIMUM OF THREE MINUTES.
UH, DO WE HAVE ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS? WE DO HONOR.
OKAY, DID I READ THAT? I GUESS I HAVE FOR EVERYONE'S NOTES.
[V. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA]
I GET A MOTION ON THE AGENDA? I'LL MAKE A MOTION.[VI. ADOPTION OF MINUTES]
UM, AND I HAVE A MOTION ON THE MINUTES FROM JUNE 22ND.JUNE 28TH, I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE.
UH, THERE BEING NO OLD BUSINESS, UM, WE HAVE UNDER DUE BUSINESS, UH, THE FIRST ITEM IS PARCEL
[IX.1. Parcel B-1 (Initial Master Plan)]
B ONE, INITIAL MASTER PLAN, A REQUEST BY BRIAN WHITMER OF WHITMER JONES KEEFER LIMITED ON BEHALF OF MILLSTONE VENTURES L L C, AND WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE PROPERTY OWNER PARCEL EIGHT A L L C FOR APPROVAL OF AN INITIAL MASTER PLAN APPLICATION.THE PROJECT REPOSES 16.02 ACRES OF RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AND 5.9 ACRES OF COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT.
WALTER P U D CONSISTS OF 21.92 ACRES IDENTIFIED BY TAX MAP NUMBER AND IT'S ON THE AGENDA AND LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF SC HIGHWAY ONE 70 AND GIBB ROAD.
AND THAT IS EXACTLY WHERE WE'RE TALKING ABOUT HERE.
IT'S LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST SIDE OF THE INTERSECTION OF GIBB ROAD AND SC ONE 70 OR
THIS IS A AERIAL LOCATION MAP SHOWING THE, UH, LOCATION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
IT'S AN INITIAL MASTER PLAN BY BRIAN WHITMER OF WHITMER JONES KEEFER ON BEHALF OF MILLSTONE VENTURES, AND WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE PROPERTY OWNER PARCEL EIGHT A L L C.
THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS WITHIN THE ABOVE WALTER P U D.
THIS, THIS, UH, MASTER PLAN, THIS IS IN THE INITIAL MASTER PLAN, BUT THIS CAME BEFORE YOU IN MAY OF THIS YEAR AS A MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT.
THERE ARE VERY MINOR CHANGES FROM WHAT WAS SUBMITTED ORIGINALLY THAT YOU GUYS APPROVED THAT WITH THREE STAFF RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS AND ONE ADDITIONAL CONDITION THAT THAT WAS, UH, ADDED BY PLANNING COMMISSION.
ACTUALLY THE PINK LINE THAT GOT A BIGGER PICTURE OF, OF THE CON OF THE MASTER PLAN.
BUT THE PINK LINE THAT YOU SEE HERE WAS, WAS ADDED.
THAT'S ACTUALLY THE, UH, THAT WAS THE ADDED CONDITION THAT THAT WAS PUT ON THE PLAN PREVIOUSLY.
SO, SO THEY HAD RESOLVED THAT.
UM, THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS WITHIN THE, WITHIN THE BUCK WALTER COMMONS LAND USE TRACK OF THE BUCKWALTER PD AND THAT ALLOWS, USES WITHIN THIS TRACK ARE OUR NEIGHBORHOOD AND GENERAL COMMERCIAL USES AND SINGLE FAMILY AND MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES.
THE INITIAL MASTER PLAN CONSISTS OF 21.92 ACRES THAT WILL INCLUDE 16.02 ACRES OF RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AND 5.9 ACRES OF COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT.
UH, THAT'S EXACTLY MATCHES THE ACREAGE OF, OF THE PREVIOUS SUBMITTAL THAT, THAT THEY HAD WITH THE MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT.
PLAN PROVIDES CONNECTIVITY BETWEEN THE USES AND NORTHWARD INTO THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES LOCATED WITHIN THE ABOVE WALTER CROSSROADS MASTER PLAN.
ALL PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS SUBJECT TO FULL REVIEW AND APPROVAL AT TIME OF DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL.
WE SAY THAT TO REMIND YOU THAT YOU ARE, YOU ARE NOT APPROVING
[00:05:01]
THE SPECIFIC LIGHT SITE LAYOUTS THAT ARE SHOWN ON THE MASTER PLAN.YOU'RE JUST APPROVING THE INITIAL MASTER PLAN.
UH, SUBJECT PROPERTY IS WITHIN THE HIGHWAY CORRIDOR OVERLAY AND WILL REQUIRE A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS REVIEWING LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND ARCHITECTURE AT TIME OF DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL.
SUBJECT PROPERTY ALSO IS WITHIN WHAT'S THE BEAUFORT COUNTY CONNECTS 2021 BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN PLAN.
THIS WAS ADOPTED BY TOWN COUNCIL.
SO UH, THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO IT.
IT, UM, REQUIRES THAT A BIKE PATH BE PROVIDED ALONG.
UH, IT'S CALLED OUT AS THE NORTHBOUND SIDE OF SC ONE 70.
SO IT WOULD BE ACROSS THE FRONTAGE OF THIS AND WE'D BE ASKING FOR THAT AS THE DEVELOPMENT PLANS COME IN.
THIS IS THE, THE, UH, MASTER PLAN THAT'S BEING PROVIDED, BEING REQUESTED TO BE APPROVED TONIGHT.
THAT'S A CLOSER VERSION OF IT IN CASE WE NEED TO COME BACK TO IT.
THESE ARE THE REVIEW CRITERIA.
SO THERE'S A PRE-APP APPLICATION MEETING IN DECEMBER OF 2022 AND THE APPLICATION CHECK-IN IN JANUARY OF 2023.
THIS WAS REVIEWED BY D R C AS AN INITIAL MASTER PLAN IN JUNE 28TH, 2023.
WE'RE HERE TONIGHT, JULY 26TH, AND YOU WILL BE RECOMMENDING MAKING A RECOMMENDATION TO TOWN COUNSEL FOR THIS MASTER PLAN.
AND THEN WE, THAT DATE WILL BE DETERMINED.
SO, SO TONIGHT YOU CAN RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE APPLICATION AS SUBMITTED.
RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE APPLICATION WITH CONDITIONS, RECOMMEND DENIAL OF THE APPLICATION AS SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT.
TOWN STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS OF THESE THREE CONDITIONS ARE THE SAME ONES THAT YOU'VE SEEN BEFORE WHEN IT CAME THROUGH AS A MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT.
IT IS, UH, ONE IS A STATEMENT SHALL BE PLACED ON THE INITIAL MASTER PLAN DECLARING THAT ALL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE MASTER PLAN SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE BUFORD COUNTY CONNECTS 2021 BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN PLAN TWO IS WHETHER LOCATED ON OR OFF SITE, IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DEVELOPER TO INSTALL A 10 FOOT WIDE BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN PATH ALONG SC ONE 70 FRONTAGE CONSISTENT WITH THE REQUIREMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE BUFORT COUNTY CONNECTS 2021 BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN PLAN IN CONJUNCTION WITH INDIVIDUAL SITE DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE PARCEL ONE INITIAL MASTER PLAN.
SO AS THE INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS COME IN, WE'LL RE WE WILL REQUIRE THAT THAT BE INSTALLED.
AND NUMBER THREE IS SITE LAYOUTS FOR ALL PARCELS ARE SUBJECT TO FULL TOWN REVIEW AND APPROVAL AT THE TIME OF DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL.
THAT'S PROCEDURAL, BUT IT'S CALLED OUT HERE BECAUSE WE HAVE, WE, WE'VE GOT A LOT OF DETAIL ON THIS MASTER PLAN.
WE WANNA REMIND YOU THAT YOU'RE NOT APPROVING THE INDIVIDUAL LAYOUTS ON THESE PARCELS.
AND I WILL OPEN IT UP FOR ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE.
SO JUST TO CLARIFY, YOUR THIRD POINT, IT COME BACK BEFORE US OR IT WILL COME BACK BEFORE US FOR EACH PARCEL.
AND THOSE PARCELS COULD BE APARTMENTS OR RETAIL OR ANY OTHER USE THAT'S PERMITTED THERE.
NOT PROVING ANY OF THAT, RIGHT? THAT'S RIGHT.
THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL IS ALLOWED THROUGH THROUGHOUT THIS, UH, THROUGHOUT ALL OF THESE PARCELS.
AND THAT'S A VERY WIDE OPEN LIST OF PERMITTED USES START.
JASON, I ACTUALLY HAVE ONE QUESTION.
UM, I SAW THE TRAFFIC STUDY, UM, WAS ASKING FOR TWO LANES AT THE, I THINK IT WAS SITE ACCESS POINT NUMBER THREE, WHICH IS THE BOTTOM OF THE SCREEN AND THAT IT ALIGNS WITH THE STATE DRIVE.
I JUST WANTED TO CONFIRM IF THIS PLAN IS SHOWING BOTH THAT THERE'S ENOUGH ROOM FOR THE TWO LANES FOR THE EGRESS AND ALSO THAT IT ALIGNS WITH ESTATE DRIVE.
IT, IT, IT, IT DOES HERE AND THEN WHEN THEY COME IN WITH, THEY COME IN WITH A DEVELOPMENT PLAN THAT THAT'S WHEN WE'LL TAKE A HARDER LOOK AT IT.
BUT, BUT, UH, THAT, THAT IS A TWO, TWO LANES IN ONE LANE OUT IS, IS WHAT'S RECOMMENDED WITH THAT.
WHAT THE, THE T I A CALLED THAT PHASE ONE OF THE DEVELOPMENT BY, BY REQUEST BY THE APPLICANT.
SO PHASE ONE BEING THE APARTMENTS AND THAT IMPROVEMENT WOULD HAPPEN WITH, WITH THE APARTMENTS.
A FUTURE PHASE WOULD KICK IN A DEDICATED LEFT TURN LANE OFF OF GBIT INTO FIGURE AS WELL.
AND, UH, TIME I TOUCHED THIS, IT DOES SOMETHING DIFFERENT.
USED TO BE FIVE SPOTS THAT WERE RUNNING PARALLEL RIGHT HERE.
[00:10:01]
RELOCATED THOSE FIVE SPOTS TO THIS POSITION.WE, WE FELT THAT, THAT THIS WAS PRETTY FAR REMOVED TO SERVE AS, AS PARKING FOR THE APARTMENTS.
UM, THE ONLY, THE ONLY QUESTION I HAVE IS NOT NECESSARILY RELATED TO TONIGHT ON THIS, BUT I JUST WANT TO GET A, HAVE US GET AN UNDERSTANDING OF THE, UH, THE R D THE RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS, THE RDUS, UM, THAT WOULD BE ASSIGNED ON THIS SITE.
SOME OF THE MASTER PLANS ALLOW FOR A PURE COMMERCIAL CONVERSION.
UM, ONE ACRE EQUALS FOUR RDUS, RIGHT? IS THAT THE CASE ON THIS OR DO THESE HAVE TO COME FROM SOMEWHERE ELSE? AND IF SO, WHERE? I THINK THEY'RE, AND I MAY NEED TO GET SOME HELP FROM MR. NESTOR ON THAT, BUT, UH, THE, THESE ENTITLEMENTS ARE ALREADY THERE, BUT I DON'T THINK THERE'S ANY MORE CONVERSIONS THAT CAN HAPPEN WITHIN THE BUCKWALTER P U D UH, IF YOU DON'T MIND ME ASKING, UH, WALTER NESTOR WAS BURN FOREMAN FOR THE, A, UH, THE LAW FIRM OF BURN FOREMAN FOR THE APPLICANT.
UM, AND, AND DAN'S CORRECT, THERE ARE NO MORE CONVERSIONS AVAILABLE LEFT IN BUCKWALTER.
ALL THOSE CONVERSIONS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED, BUT THIS LAND IS ENTITLED ALREADY.
SO THE, THESE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS RUN RUN WITH THE LAND, UH, IN THIS AREA OF BUCKWALTER COMMONS.
SO THIS LAND HAS ACTUAL DWELLING UNITS OR THEY'RE JUST COMING FROM SOMEWHERE IN BUCK, BUCK WALTER COMMONS.
OVERALL, THEY'RE COMING FROM OWNERS OWNERSHIP IN BUCK WALTER COMMONS, WHICH THERE'S SOME COMMON OWNERSHIP IN BUCK WALTER COMMONS, NOT ONLY THE EXISTING OWNER, BUT OTHER, UH, OTHER ENTITIES ALL RUNNING DOWN TO THE SAME OWNER.
BUT THAT THE PURCHASE CONTRACT CONTEMPLATES THE ASSIGNMENT OF THE DENSITY RIGHTS OR THE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS FROM THAT OWNER.
THEN THE ONLY QUESTION I HAVE, AND I I JUST WANNA MAKE SURE WE DON'T DO ANYTHING WRONG FOR THE PROPERTY OWNER BECAUSE THIS IS ITS OWN I M P, ARE THEY STILL GOING TO BE ABLE TO ASSIGN PROPERLY BETWEEN THE DIFFERENT AREAS OF BUCK WALTER COMMONS? OR DOES THAT MAKE 'EM SOMETHING CAN'T COME FROM BUCK WALTER COMMONS HERE? 'CAUSE THIS IS NOT BUCK WALTER COMMONS ANYMORE.
CORRECT? THIS, THIS, THIS IS STILL THE BUCK AUTHOR COMMENTS.
IT'S STILL UNDER THAT UMBRELLA.
IT'S JUST A MASTER PLAN WITHIN THE UMBRELLA, RIGHT? RIGHT.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? THANK YOU, WALTER.
CAN YOU PULL OPPORTUNITY FOR THAT? OH, I'M SORRY.
DO YOU WANT TO, WE
THANK YOU, DAN, FOR PRESENTING OUR PROJECT.
UH, APPRECIATE THAT VERY MUCH.
UM, JUST, THIS IS A LITTLE BIT OF A REITERATION, BUT OBVIOUSLY WE'RE BACK WITH A NEW MASTER PLAN INSTEAD OF A MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT JUST TO KEEP IT SIMPLER AND SO THAT WE CAN CONSIDER THIS TRACK, UH, AND THE MASTER PLAN FOR IT WITHOUT HAVING TO GET INTO DETAILS ASSOCIATED WITH A BUNCH OF OTHER PROPERTIES THAT ARE PART OF THE WALTER CROSSROADS, UH, MASTER PLANS.
SO THANKS FOR GIVING US THE OPPORTUNITY TO DO THAT.
AND, UM, NO, I MEAN THAT'S REALLY IT.
UH, IF YOU GUYS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FOR US AS APPLICANT, WE'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY OF THOSE.
WE HAVE OUR WHOLE DESIGN TEAM HERE TODAY WITH WARD EDWARDS, UH, WITH JONES'S KEY FOR, AND EVEN OUR TRAFFIC ENGINEER, UH, AND THEN US MILLSTONE ARE HERE TODAY.
SO HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU HAVE.
DAN, CAN YOU PUT UP YOUR SCREEN AGAIN WITH THE, I WILL MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS ACCORDING TO TOWN STAFF FIND THAT THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 3.9 0.3 OF THE U D O CAN BE MET WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION PROVIDE RECOMMENDATION OF ADDITIONAL APPROVAL TO THE TOWN COUNCIL FOR THE PARCEL BE DASH ONE INITIAL MASTER PLAN NUMBER ONE, THE STATEMENT SHALL BE PLACED ON THE INITIAL MASTER PLAN DECLARING THAT ALL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE MASTER PLAN SHALL PERFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE BEFIT COUNTY CONNECTS 2021 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN.
NUMBER TWO, WHETHER LOCATED ON OR OFFSITE, IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DEVELOPERS TO INSTALL A 10 FOOT WIDE BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PATH ALONG SOUTH CAROLINA HIGHWAY ONE 70 FRONTAGE CONSISTENT WITH THE REQUIREMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE BEAUFORD COUNTY CONNECT'S 2021 BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN PLAN IN CONJUNCTION WITH INDIVIDUAL SITE DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE POSSIBLE B ONE INITIAL MASTER PLAN.
AND NUMBER THREE, SITE LAYOUTS FOR ALL PARCELS ARE SUBJECT TO FULL TIME REVIEW, APPROVAL OF TIME OF DEVELOPMENT PLANS, SUBMITTAL.
[00:15:01]
WE HAVE A SECOND? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? A.[IX.2. CarVillage Bluffton (Development Plan Application)]
ON THE AGENDA.CAR BILL BLUFFTON DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPLICATION.
OUR REQUEST BY DANKE FOR WEBER JONES.
KEY FOR LIMITED ON BEHALF OF THE PROPERTY OWNER, CHARLIE AND BROWN, L L C FOR APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN.
THE PROJECT CONSISTS OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PLUS OR MINUS 20,000 SQUARE FOOT, TWO STORY CLUBHOUSE AND FIVE BUILDINGS DIVIDED INTO PLUS OR MINUS 31 HIGH END GARAGE CONDOMINIUM UNITS.
THE PROPERTY IS ZONED VILLAGE AT VERDIER VERRE P U D, AND CONSISTS OF APPROXIMATELY FIVE ACRES.
AND THE TAX MAP IDENTIFICATION IS IN THE AGENDA AND IT'S LOCATED ON HIGHWAY ONE 70, APPROXIMATELY 1200 FEET SOUTH OF SEA GRASS STATION ROAD, MR. FRICKER.
THIS IS A PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR CARR VILLAGE, THE APPLICANT DAN KEEFER, BUT JONES KEEFER ON BEHALF OF THE PROPERTY OWNER.
CHARLIE BROWN, L L C IS REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN, PROJECT PROPOSALS AND AUTOMOTIVE ENTHUSIAST CLUB TO INCLUDE A CLUBHOUSE AND HIGH-END GARAGE CONDO UNITS.
A FIVE ACRE PROPERTY IS ZONES VILLAGE APER DEER, P U D, AND IT'S LOCATED WITHIN THE VILLAGE.
A FORDE MASTER PLAN ON THE WEST SIDE OF OKEE HIGHWAY, APPROXIMATELY 1200 FEET SOUTH OF SEAGRASS STATION ROAD.
HERE IS AN AERIAL PHOTO SHOWING THE LOCATION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
UM, PRECEDING THIS APPLICATION, THE THE APPLICANT HAD REQUESTED A MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT THAT CAME BEFORE YOU.
YOU GUYS RECOMMENDED APPROVAL TO TOWN COUNCIL.
IT ULTIMATELY GOT APPROVED AT TOWN COUNCIL, UH, PRIOR TO THE AMENDMENT.
THE ROAD THAT'S HERE, IT'S ACTUALLY BLOWN UP OVER HERE TO THE RIGHT, WAS SHOWN THE SAME AS THE REST OF THESE.
IT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE A RESIDENTIAL ROAD THAT PROVIDED, UH, PROVIDED ACCESS OUT TO, TO, UH, C ONE 70, UH, CUTTING ACROSS WHAT WE CALL PARCEL YZ, WHICH IS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
THE, THE APPLICANT REQUESTED THAT THAT ROAD BE TURNED INTO AN EMERGENCE ACCESS ROAD ONLY, AND IT WOULD HAVE TWO GATES ON IT.
YOU'LL BE ABLE TO SEE THE GATES BETTER WHEN I PULL UP THE SITE PLAN THAT WAS APPROVED AT TOWN COUNCIL.
AND SO WHERE WE ARE NOW IS WE HAVE AN AMENDED MASTER PLAN THAT KIND OF FITS THE BUSINESS PLAN OF BUSINESS MODEL OF THIS CAR VILLAGE BLUFFTON.
THIS APPLICATION IS FOR PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN LOCATED WITHIN THE VILLAGE AT FORDE, AND IT'S SUBJECT TO THE STANDARD SET FORTH IN THE VILLAGE AT FORDE.
P U D MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PROJECT PROPOSES THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 20,000 SQUARE FOOT, TWO STORY CLUBHOUSE AND FIVE BUILDINGS DIVIDED INTO A TOTAL OF 31 HIGH-END GARAGE CONDO UNITS.
CLUBHOUSE WILL INCLUDE A SHOWROOM, LOUNGE AREA OFFICES, LIGHT AUTOMOTIVE MAINTENANCE, COMMON GATHERING SPACES, OFFICES, DINING AND KITCHEN FACILITIES WILL BE ON SECOND FLOOR.
THE INDIVIDUALLY OWNED GARAGE CONDOS ARE APPROXIMATELY 1,680 SQUARE FEET AND WILL INCLUDE STORAGE FOR COLLECTOR AND OR CLASSIC MOTOR VEHICLES.
THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS IN THE HIGHWAY CORRIDOR LANE AND WILL REQUIRE A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS REVIEWING LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND ARCHITECTURE.
SO THAT WILL COME BEFORE YOU AGAIN, A TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM.
ANALYZING THE TRAFFIC IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED ROADWAY CHANGES WAS PROVIDED AS PART OF THE MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT.
AND THE FINDING WAS THAT BASED ON THE CAPACITY ANALYSIS, REMOVING ACCESS TO HAGAR STREET WILL HAVE A MINIMAL IMPACT ON THE SURROUNDING ROAD NETWORK.
SO THAT WAS BROUGHT TO COUNCIL AS PART OF THE MASTER PLAN, BUT BROUGHT UP AGAIN HERE AS A REMINDER.
STAFF COMMENTS ON A PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN WERE REVIEWED AT THE JUNE 21ST, 2023 DEVELOPMENT OR D R C MEETING.
THE APPLICANT PROVIDED A RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ON JUNE 28.
GOT A, UH, BLOWN UP VERSION IF WE NEED TO GO BACK TO IT.
UH, REVIEW CRITERIA COME, IT'S SET FORTH IN SECTION THREE TEN THREE A OF THE U D O.
THESE ARE THE REVIEW CRITERIA THAT WERE INCLUDED IN YOUR FUNDING COMMISSION PACKET.
YOU HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO TAKE THE FOLLOWING ACTION, APPROVE THE APPLICATION AS SUBMIT BY THE APPLICANT, APPROVE THE APPLICATION WITH CONDITIONS TABLE THE APPLICATION, OR DENY THE APPLICATION AS SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT.
FINDS THAT THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION THREE TEN THREE A OF THE DEVELOPMENT
[00:20:01]
ORDINANCE ARE MET AND RECOMMENDED THAT THE FINDING COMMISSION APPROVE THE APPLICATION AS SUBMITTED.WE WORKED A LOT WITH THE APPLICANT ON THIS.
IT'S, IT'S BEEN A LONG ROAD FOR THAT ACTUALLY WENT TO B Z A FOR, UH, APPEAL OF A U D O ADMINISTRATOR DECISION ON WHETHER, UH, HOW TO DEFINE THE PERMITTED USE.
UM, SO I'LL JUST OPEN IT UP FOR QUESTIONS.
TELL YOU WHAT, WHY DON'T, WHY DON'T WE DO THIS THE WAY I SHOULD HAVE ON THE LAST ONE.
UM, WOULD THE APPLICANT LIKE TO SPEAK AND THEN WE WILL.
I'M THANK YOU COMMISSIONER WEER.
UH, MY NAME'S DAN KEEFER WITH WHITMER KEEFER AND COMMAND THE PROJECT TEAM HERE.
UM, CALEB KING IS WITH OUR, OUR GROUP AT DYLAN TURNER, TRAFFIC ENGINEER, WALTER NESTER, KEVIN BIEBEL, OWNER'S REP, AND JEFF ACK OR TIM WITH ACKMAN ENGINEERING.
UM, WE'RE HERE PRIMARILY TO ANSWER QUESTIONS.
I THINK WE'VE ADDRESSED EVERYTHING THAT DAN AND APPRECIATE DAN'S HELP.
AND IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS FOR US, WE GOT EVERYBODY HERE.
WELL, I KNOW A CONCERN IN THE PAST WAS, UH, THE NEIGHBORS AND THEIR REACTION.
CAN YOU JUST GO THROUGH, UM, WHAT KIND OF COMMUNICATIONS YOU'VE HAD WITH THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS? YES.
WE, WE'VE HAD SEVERAL MEETINGS WITH THE OWNERS.
MOST RECENT, AND I WON'T GO BACK, ANN WAS INVOLVED IN THE LAST ONE WITH THE ROAD RELOCATION.
UM, WE HAD A CALL LAST WEEK WITH THE OWNERS, UM, WITH THE, WITH THE BOARD MEMBERS.
AND DURING THAT CALL, WE PRESENTED THIS PLAN OR SHOWED 'EM THIS PLAN AND EVERYTHING THAT'S BEING REVIEWED THIS EVENING.
UM, AND THEN WE LET THEM KNOW THAT PRIOR TO THE NEXT, WE GOTTA SUBMIT FOR CORRIDOR REVIEW.
THAT'LL BE ARCHITECTURE, LANDSCAPE, AND LIGHTING.
SO WE'RE GONNA MEET WITH THEM AGAIN PRIOR TO THAT SUBMIT OR DURING THAT SUBMITTAL PROCESS AS WELL.
SO WE'VE MET WITH THEM THREE OR FOUR TIMES ALREADY AND KEEPING 'EM UP TO SPEED.
AND WE HAD THE PUBLIC NOTICE AS WELL THAT I GOT SENT OUT.
AND, UH, UH, COMMISSIONER BROAD, JUST SO YOU KNOW, ANYTHING LIKE THIS, UM, EVERY ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER HAS TO RECEIVE A CERTIFIED LETTER THAT THIS IS PROPOSED.
SO YEAH, THAT'S WHAT HE'S MENTIONING ON THAT.
UH, QUESTIONS? VETERANS OR COMMENTS? OH, COME ON GUYS.
IS THERE A PARTY? EVERYONE IS, NO.
UH, I DO JUST WANNA MAKE A COMMENT, AND WE DISCUSSED THIS A LITTLE BIT BEFORE THE MEETING.
UM, I WENT ONTO THE, UH, CARR VILLAGE WEBSITE TO KIND OF GET A FEEL FOR WHAT'S COMING UP.
UM, PLEASE BE AWARE WHEN YOU, AND I'M ONE OF SIX PEOPLE UP HERE, SO THE OTHER COMMISSIONERS, I FEEL THE SAYING, BUT I THINK THEY DO.
THE ARCHITECTURE THAT IS PRESENTED ON THAT WEBSITE IS VERY STARK AND NOT NECESSARY NECESSARILY IN THE LOW COUNTRY VERNACULAR AS IT ADDRESSES ONE 70.
THAT MAY BE A CHALLENGE AND I TRUST, I TRUST STAFF TO WORK ON IT, UH, WITH THE APPLICANT.
AND YOU MAY ALREADY HAVE SOMEWHAT, UH, BUT JUST KNOW THAT THAT WHAT'S ON THAT WEBSITE IS NOT GREAT.
HAVE HAS STAFF BEEN WORKING AT ALL ON THAT? OR IS OH, WE HAVEN'T.
FIRST OF ALL, THIS IS GONNA GET APPROVED BEFORE THEY CAN SUBMIT FOR IT, BUT, UM, NO, WE, WE HAVEN'T, WE WON'T EVEN ADDRESS IT UNTIL SUCH TIME AS IT COMES BEFORE IT SAYS AN OFFICIAL APPLICATION.
I WAS, I WAS CONSUMING THE SAME THING BECAUSE THE BACK OF THE BUILDINGS IS WHAT'S FACING.
WHAT'S THAT? IT'S GONNA BE A BIT OF A CHALLENGE.
YEAH, THE BACK'S GONNA BE A CHALLENGE.
THE LANDSCAPING WILL HAVE TO AND, AND WE'RE GETTING AHEAD OF OURSELVES HERE, BUT, UM, SOME OF THE RENDERINGS ARE REALLY COOL LOOKING, BUT NOT NECESSARILY IN WHAT WE'RE TASKED WITH DOING.
SO JUST DON'T WANT YOU ALL TO MAKE A BUNCH OF, DO A BUNCH OF WORK BEFORE YOU COME TO STAFF WITH THE APPLICATION THAT, THAT MAY HAVE TO BE RE REWARDED.
UM, ANYBODY WANT TO MAKE A MOTION? UH, DAN IF YOU PULL IT UP, I'LL MAKE A MOTION.
UM, I RECOMMEND THAT WE APPROVE, UH, TOWN STAFF FINDS THAT THE REQUIRES OF SECTION THREE TEN THREE A OF UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE OR MET AND RECOMMENDS THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION, WE AS THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVE THE APPLICATION AS SUBMITTED.
DO WE HAVE A SECOND? ALL IN FAVOR? AYE.
[X. DISCUSSION]
OKAY.I HAVE ONE ITEM FOR DISCUSSION.
I DON'T KNOW IF ANYBODY ELSE DOES, BUT, UH, WELCOME TO OUR NEW CHAIRMAN, MR. MICHAEL BROCK.
WE ARE GLAD TO HAVE YOU HERE WITH US.
[00:25:01]
YOU.AND, UM, HOPEFULLY YOU'LL STAY MORE THAN ONE MONTH.
THIS IS WHAT THEY'RE ALL, CAN'T PROMISE THAT.
UM, ANYTHING ELSE FOR DISCUSSION? UH, ANYBODY ELSE WANNA SAY ANYTHING ELSE LIKE NO, IT WAS NICE SAID THAT MICHAEL, CHARLIE WAS FINE.
I'LL MAKE A MOTION THAT WE AURN YOU DID A GOOD JOB.