7. RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 2022/45 BY REMOVING THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 68 HELMSMAN WAY WITH TMS NO. R552 010 000 0309 0000 AND OTHER MATTERS RELATED THERETO

[7. RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 2022/45 BY REMOVING THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 68 HELMSMAN WAY WITH TMS NO. R552 010 000 0309 0000 AND OTHER MATTERS RELATED THERETO]

APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 2020 245 BY REMOVING THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 68 HELMSMAN WAY WITH TIMES NUMBER ARE 55201000003090000 AND OTHER MATTERS RELATED THERE TOO DO WE HAVE A MOTION A SECOND? WELL I'LL MAKE THE MOTION TO THE SECOND. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION REGARDING AGENDA ITEM SEVEN? I HAVE A QUESTION MR. CHAIR SO MY QUESTION THIS IS GREAT THAT WE DID DUE DILIGENCE AND FOUND THIS BUT WHO DOES OWN THE PROPERTY SINCE IT'S NOT LIKE GOD OR WHO OWNS THE PROPERTY I DON'T KNOW. IT'S PRETTY MUCH THE WITH WORKING WITH STUFF WE DID RESEARCH THE PROPERTY AND I HAVE REACHED OUT TO CDOT. THEY ARE THE PROPERTY OWNERS OF THE PROPERTY THEY OWNED IT WHEN PUTTING IT IN THE CROSS ISLAND PARKWAY AT THIS TIME THE SIDOTI I'VE ALSO WORKED WITH THEM TO PROVIDE THE COUNTY WITH A ENCROACHMENT PERMIT SO WE DO HAVE ALL ACCESS RIGHTS TO THE PROPERTY AND WE WE'RE LOOKING TO WORK WITH ON A PERMANENT LEASE SITUATION WITH THAT PROPERTY AS WELL. GREAT.

YOU ARE THERE ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS? IS GOING TO BE WITHOUT ANY OBJECTION THIS WILL PASS A LOCAL COUNCIL AND WE'LL MOVE IT THERE.

DOES THIS NEED TO GO TO THE COUNCIL YEAH THEY WILL MAKE IT TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE IT WILL BE ON THE AGENDA TONIGHT. OKAY. AND THIS WILL MOVE THE COUNCIL

[8. RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE BEAUFORT COUNTY ORDINANCE REGARDING A ROAD USE FEE]

FOR FOUR FULL FULL APPROVAL AND THE FIRST READING AND MOVING INTO AGENDA EIGHT RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE COUNTY ORDINANCE REGARDING USE FEE DO WE HAVE A MOTION A SECOND OPEN UP DISCUSSION? I'LL MAKE THE MOTION MR. CHAIRMAN. I SEE. DO WE HAVE ANY DISCUSSION AND MR. FREILICH, ARE YOU GOING TO PRESENT THIS? PLEASE? YEAH. MYSELF AND ERIC CLAUSEN AND KEVIN HAVE BEEN WORKING ON THIS SO THIS IS ROAD USE FEE. THIS IS NOT A DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE.

THIS A AMOUNT OF MONEY THAT'S PLACED ON NEW REGISTRY OF VEHICLES EACH YEAR.

SO WHEN YOU REGISTER YOUR CAR AND RENEW YOUR TAXES THERE'S A $10 FEE OR $10 FEE THAT GOES TOWARDS THE MAINTENANCE OF OWNED ROADS AND FACILITIES. SO THIS IF YOU RECALL THERE WAS A A COURT CASE THAT CAME UP IN GREENVILLE COUNTY. BURNS GREENVILLE COUNTY ABOUT WHETHER THE APPROPRIATION OF ROAD FEE WAS A LEGAL ACTION OR NOT OR WHETHER IT WAS A TAX THAT WAS IN 2020. AND DURING THAT TIME WE HAD ALREADY HAD A ROAD USE FEE AND OF THE TIMING OF THAT LAWSUIT IT WAS RETRO I THINK BACK TO 1997 IS WHEN THE COURT CASE WAS NEEDED GREENVILLE'S COUNTY ROAD USE FEE WAS INITIATED. WE HAD A ROAD USE FEE THAT WAS GRANDFATHERED TO THAT ACTUALLY IN 1972. SO THAT'S PRETTY PROGRESSIVE I WOULD SAY FROM COUNTY TO HAVE A $2 ROAD USE FEEDBACK IN 1972 AND THEN IN 1993 IT GOT INCREASED TO $10 OVER THE YEARS THERE WAS UPDATES IN 2000 1215 AND 2015 AND IT GOT ADJUSTED UP

[00:05:03]

TO $16.67 WHEN THE BURNS CASE CAME IN BECAUSE OUR ROAD USE FEE WAS OLDER THAN THE CASE THAT WAS UNDER QUESTION WE REVISED OURS IN 2020 AND WENT BACK TO $10 WHICH WAS FEE IN 1993 PRIOR TO THE 1997 CASE. SO AT THAT TIME WE'D BEEN WAITING TO SEE HOW THAT TURNED OUT. THERE HAS BEEN LEGISLATION THAT'S BEEN THAT IS A ALLOWS FOR THE ROAD USE FEE TO CONTINUE IN A IN A MODIFIED STATE SO THAT'S WHAT THIS ORDINANCE DESCRIBING THE NEW CHARACTERISTICS AND THE ROAD USE FEE SO THE $10 FEE WAS PRODUCING ABOUT $1.6 MILLION WE USE THIS USE FEE FOR MULTIPLE THINGS BUT ONE THING IS FOR DIRT ROAD AND WE HAVE A YEARLY CONTRACT THAT GOES OUT ON A YEAR PAVING PLAN AND WE USE A LOT OF THE FUNDS ARE THAT ARE GENERATED FROM THIS FOR THAT FUNDING FOR THAT PAYMENT PLAN.

SO WHAT WE'RE RECOMMENDING IS INCREASE THE FEE TO $20 SO UP FROM THE $16 THAT WE WERE AND WE WENT BACK TO $10 NOW TO PUT IT AS $20 AS THE REVISED FEE AND THAT WOULD GO IN EFFECT AND THEN WE WOULD OUR ARE GENERATED APPROXIMATELY $3 MILLION WOULD BE GENERATED FOR THAT FEE SO THAT'S KIND OF THE BACKGROUND HISTORY AND IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CAN ANSWER FROM THERE IF I MAY. YES JARED THANKS FOR THE PRESENTATION.

UM WHAT IS THE PURPOSE FOR THE I MEAN WE ARE WE'RE WE HAVE AN INVENTORY OF DIRT ROADS THAT IN THE PIPELINE FOR PAVING AND THEN WE HAVE ADDITIONAL DIRT ROADS THAT ARE TO BE PAVED IN THE FUTURE. THAT'S RIGHT. SO WE HAVE WE HAVE THE TAG FUNDS ALREADY IN PLACE AND WE GET TAX DOLLARS FROM THE STATE I'M OUT HERE SO THE TAX DOLLARS FROM THE STATE IS FROM GAS TAX WHICH IS SO TWO DIFFERENT SETS OF MONEY IN THE PAST THERE HAD BEEN CTC AND FUNDS WERE USED INTERCHANGEABLY ON DIFFERENT ROAD PROJECTS WHETHER.

IT WAS RESURFACING OR PAVING THE DIRT ROADS CTC HAS BEEN MORE INCLINED TO SPEND THEIR FUNDING ON RESURFACE THE ROADS AS OF LATE VERSUS DIRT ROAD PAVING SO A LOT THE FUNDS WE'VE BEEN USING TAG FUNDS FOR DIRT ROAD PAVING BUT OTHER THINGS AS THEY COME ABOUT SO THE INCREASE THE REASON FOR THE INCREASE AS YOU CAN GUESS SO THE COST OF CONSTRUCTION HAS INCREASED OVER TIME AND SO THIS IS JUST BRINGING THAT CURRENT SO WE HAVE A FIVE YEAR PLAN THAT BASED OFF THE PREVIOUS AMOUNT THE $16 WE WERE COLLECTING ABOUT TWO AND A HALF MILLION DOLLARS AND THAT'S WHAT OUR FIVE YEAR PLAN EVERY YEAR WE PUT OUT ABOUT A TWO AND A HALF MILLION DOLLARS CONTRACT. SO TO STAY ON THAT SAME WE GET ABOUT TWO MILES OR FOUR 4 TO 5 ROADS ACCOMPLISHED WITH THAT TWO AND A HALF MILES ARE TWO AND A HALF MILLION DOLLARS AND TODAY'S COST OF CONSTRUCTION TO KEEP THAT SAME PACE THAT'S REASON FOR THE INCREASE TO GET TO $20 SO SO THIS IS NOT GOING TO SPEED UP THE PROCESS OF GETTING ALL THE DIRT ROADS NO THIS IS JUST GOING TO KEEP US AT THE SAME STEADY RATE FOR YES.

THANK YOU. I HAD A GO AHEAD. YES CAN YOU TELL US AGAIN HOW MANY MILES OF UNPAVED ROADS ARE IN THE COUNTY? SO 71 I BELIEVE IT IS OKAY.

YEAH I HAVE A QUESTION IS SO IN YOUR PROJECT NARRATIVE IT SAYS LAST SENTENCE NEEDED THE CURRENT ROAD USE FOR OR THE PROPOSED INCREASE WILL GENERATE REVENUE THAT WOULD MEET OR EXCEED THE COST OF MAINTAINING AND IMPROVING THE COUNTY'S ROAD SYSTEM AS IT IS DID TREATING WHICH I HAD TO GO LOOK UP THAT WORD FASTER THAN THE COUNTY CAN FUND I THINK THAT WAS A LEGAL TERM I LOOKED AT SO BASICALLY WHAT WE'RE SAYING WITH THIS ROAD USE FEE THAT IS KEEPING PACE WITH OUR MAINTENANCE EFFORTS ON OUR COUNTY SYSTEM. SO THAT'S IN ESSENCE AND WHETHER THAT'S PAVING OUR DIRT ROADS AND MAINTAINING IN THAT SHAPE OR WHETHER IT'S MISCELLANEOUS SPOT IMPROVEMENTS BUT THAT'S THAT'S THE INTENDED USE OF THIS FEE.

I JUST WONDERED YOU DON'T TELL ME WHY YOU DIDN'T INCREASE IT MORE.

WELL, I CAN'T MEET THE FINE. I THINK THIS GOES BACK TO THAT BURNS AND THE ACTUAL SPECIFICS IN THE USE OF THE FEE I'M NOT THE LEGAL EXPERT IN THE ROOM BUT I THINK THAT THE REASON WHY NOT MAKE IT $40 AND WE GET MORE DIRT ROADS DONE I THINK THE INTENT IS THAT IT'S NOT A PROFIT CENTER WHERE WE ARE WHERE WE'RE MAKING VAST IMPROVEMENTS THIS IS A KEEP

[00:10:02]

ROADS IN AS GOOD OF SHAPE AS WE CAN BUT AND THIS WILL ALSO BE EVALUATED ON AN ANNUAL BASIS SO THE IDEA THAT WE'RE GOING FROM TEN UP TO 20 IS QUITE A BIT TO BITE OFF.

SO AGAIN AS THIS IS EVALUATED FURTHER INTO THE FUTURE WE CAN MAKE THOSE INCREMENTAL INCREASES. I REALLY APPRECIATED ALL THE DETAIL IN THE ORDINANCE WHICH I WOULD ENCOURAGE ANYBODY LISTENING TO REALLY READ OF THIS BECAUSE I KNEW WE HAD OVER 700 MILES OF ROADS 77 ALL THAT BUT IT'S VERY INTERESTING TO SEE IT PANS OUT WITH EXCELLENT CONDITION, GOOD CONDITION, FAIR CONDITION AND IT SHOWS THE NEED TO DO THIS SO THERE'S GOOD INFORMATION. THANK YOU, MR. COLE, I'M ASSUMING.

YEAH. THANK YOU, CHAIRMAN I APPRECIATE THE THE REQUEST BEING MADE AT THIS TIME. WE WENT FROM 16 DOWN TO TEN AND NOW WE'RE GOING UP TO 20 AND I THINK I WAS REALLY DISAPPOINTED WITH THE GREENVILLE LAWSUIT BUT IT HAPPENED WE WERE ABLE TO RELEASE 15 ON TO THE TEN. SO I'M GLAD TO SEE THAT I AM I'VE VERY IMPRESSED WITH THE CDC AND YOUR EFFORT AND DIRT ROADS THAT IS REALLY HARD PRESS FOR MY DISTRICT PARTICULARLY AND MR. DAWSON DISTRICT THREE IN THE RURAL THE GREATER RURAL PART OF THE COMMUNITY IT IS ALSO IN ON HILTON HEAD ETC. SO I UNDERSTAND THAT SO I AM WITH THIS FUNDING LIKE SAID ERIC YOU'RE GOING TO EVALUATE TO SEE WHETHER WE NEED TO INCREASE IT. WE'RE NOT TRYING TO OVERTAX PEOPLE SO WE'LL GET BACK INTO THE GAME. SO I'M GOING TO SUPPORT THE MOTION LOOKING EVALUATING FOR THE FUTURE AND THEN WE GO FROM THERE.

BUT YOUR GOAL WAS TO ELIMINATE DIRT ROADS. I THINK THIS IS AN EFFORT AND YOU KNOW YOU'RE GOING TO DO EVERYTHING YOU CAN TO REACH THAT GOAL WITH YOU.

WELL, AND THIS IS ONE FUNDING OPPORTUNITY SO THERE'S OTHER FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES OUT THERE. BUT THIS IS MOST ANY PROJECT HAS MULTIPLE SOURCES OF FUNDING. SO IF WE'RE GOING TO REACH THAT GOAL THERE'S PROBABLY NEED FOR OTHER FUNDING SOURCES BUT THIS IS A GOOD STEP IN THAT. OKAY.

I KNOW ARE THERE ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS OR ANY MORE SEEING NOTHING MORE IS THERE ANY OBJECTION TO MOVE THIS ON TO COUNTY COUNCIL? ALL RIGHT.

[9. RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE DEMOLITION OF STRUCTURES AND FUNDING FOR DEMOLITION OF STRUCTURES ON BEAUFORT COUNTY OWNED PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2 MULLET STREET]

IT WILL MOVE TO COUNTY COUNCIL AND MOVE IT ON TO AGENDA ITEM NINE RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING DEMOLITION OF STRUCTURES AND FUNDING FOR DEMOLITION OF STRUCTURES ON COUNTY OWNED PROPERTY LOCATED AT TWO MULLIN STREET.

I HAVE A MOTION A SECOND TO OPEN DISCUSSION SO MOVE THERE A SECOND SECOND AND BRITNEY ARE YOU GOING A PRESENT ON THIS WOULD ANYBODY LIKE HER DISCUSS THIS TOO? STREET WAS PURCHASED AS A PROPERTY AND THE POUDRE ROAD THAT'S THE CURRENT BOAT LANDING IT WAS PURCHASED FROM A CURRENT PROPERTY OWNER AN EFFORT TO EXPAND PARKING LOTS IN THE PARK AND OTHER INFRASTRUCTURES DOWN THERE AND DOING SO WE HAD AN APPRAISAL COMPLETED.

THAT APPRAISAL DID TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION THE AGE AND WHAT WAS VISUALLY APPARENT TO THE APPRAISER AT THAT TIME. SO IN DOING RESEARCH AFTERWARDS AS TO THE CURRENT THE OTHER SIDE HAS CONTACT A CONSULTANT WHO HAS GONE OUT THERE AND IT IS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE COUNTY AT THIS POINT TO DEMO THE CURRENT DOC SYSTEM AND ACTUALLY IF DECIDED APPROPRIATE WE CAN REBUILD THAT TIME. SO IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ON THE ENGINEERING SIDE AND I'LL LEAVE THOSE TO NEAL TO ANSWER BECAUSE I WAS NOT MY FORTE. THANK YOU.

ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. DAWSON? YOU SEE IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? I LIKE TO HEAR HIM TALK BUT THAT'S ALL RIGHT.

OKAY, GOOD. YEAH. SO YEP.

SO WE ENGAGED A MARINE CONTRACTOR WHO CAME IN AND INSPECTED THE STRUCTURE THERE THERE WAS ALSO A DIVING COMPONENT WHERE THEY WERE LOOKING AT THE PILINGS AND BASED ON THE DOVE AND ALSO THE ASSESSMENT FROM THE CONSULTANT LOOKS LIKE THAT IT WOULD PROBABLY BE EXTENSIVELY CHEAPER TO DEMOLISH THE STRUCTURE RATHER THAN COME IN PREFAB OR RENOVATE AND WHATNOT. SO A LOT OF THE BOARDS ARE ON THE EXISTING STRUCTURE ARE UNSAFE TO EVEN WALK ON BASED ON MY VISUAL INSPECTION SO THAT'S WHAT'S BEFORE YOU BUT ANY ANY DISCUSSION OR ANY QUESTIONS OR DISCUSSION ALL RIGHT SEEING. NO.

IS THERE ANY OBJECTION TO MOVE THIS FORWARD TO FORT CAMPBELL COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL? DON'T WORRY. IT IS PAST. WE'LL MOVE TOWARDS COUNTY

[00:15:02]

COUNCIL. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN. YES, MR. SALLY.

THIS IS A PERSONAL SHOULD I SHOULD EMAIL YOU ON THIS BUT THE CONVERSATION WE HAD ABOUT THE OTHER BOAT LANDING OR LEAD ZONE REACHED OUT THEIR FAMILY MEMBERS THAT YOU HAD IN THE PAST THERE WAS ISSUES WITH THE FAMILY WITH HEALTH ETC. BUT I THINK SHE MAY BE AVAILABLE SO

[10. RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO EXECUTE MUTUAL AID AGREEMENTS REGARDING RELOCATION OF DETAINEES ON A TEMPORARY BASIS DURING AN EMERGENCY, WITH AIKEN COUNTY, ALLENDALE COUNTY, CHARLESTON COUNTY, COLLETON COUNTY, DORCHESTER COUNTY, FLORENCE COUNTY, GREENVILLE COUNTY, HAMPTON COUNTY, JASPER COUNTY, LEXINGTON COUNTY, ORANGEBURG COUNTY, AND RICHLAND COUNTY.]

THANK YOU MICHELLE ABSOLUTELY. I JUST WANT TO PASS THAT ON BEFORE YOU LEAVE INSIDE.

THANK YOU. AGENDA ITEM TEN IS RECOMMEND APPROVAL A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO EXECUTE MUTUAL AID AGREEMENTS RELOCATION OF DETAINEES ON A TEMPORARY BASIS DURING AN WITH AIKEN COUNTY, ALLENDALE COUNTY, CHARLESTON COUNTY. CLAYTON COUNTY. DORCHESTER COUNTY.

FLORENCE COUNTY. GREENVILLE COUNTY. HAMPDEN COUNTY.

JASPER COUNTY LEXINGTON COUNTY ORANGEBURG COUNTY AND RICHLAND COUNTY.

I MAY I HAVE A MOTION IN A SECOND TO OPEN DISCUSSION. I'LL MAKE THE MOTION CHAIRMAN A SECOND TIME. AND IS THERE A PRISONER THIS ONE? I BELIEVE MR. ROBINSON. AFTERNOON. HOW ARE YOU? OKAY. THIS IS BASICALLY RENEW ALL OF OUR ANNUAL CONTRACTS.

THE DIFFERENCE WITH THE THE HEMINGWAYS THAT YOU HAVE IS THAT WE'VE EXTENDED THESE FOR FIVE YEARS WHERE NORMALLY THERE ARE AN ANNUAL RENEWAL. OTHER THAN THAT THEY'RE ABOUT THE SAME. IS THERE ANY SPECIFIC QUESTIONS ABOUT THE EMPLOYEES THAT YOU WANT TO ASK? SO THEY'RE RECIPROCAL DOCUMENTS .

SO WHILE THEY ARE WITH 12 OTHER COUNTIES THEY ALSO INCLUDE THE SERVICE THAT WE WOULD PROVIDE TO THOSE COUNTIES IF THAT WERE INDEED THE SAME UNIT USING OUR FACILITY.

YOU MEAN? YES, SIR. YEAH.

HAVE WE USED. DO WE USE IT DURING MATTHEW? WE HAVE.

WE HAVE TRANSPORTED INMATES TO OTHER FACILITIES BUT WE HAVE NOT HAD OTHER FACILITIES HAD TO COME HERE. NOT YET. I DON'T KNOW.

OKAY. AND THIS IF APPROVED DOES NOT NEED TO GO TO COUNTY COUNCIL.

CORRECT. THE ROAD TO RESUME. SO ONE ONE READING FOR FAR SO BECAUSE THE COUNTY DOES A RECOMMENDATION RECOMMEND FOR COUNSEL FOR APPROVAL WE ARE THERE. IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION OR ANY OTHER.

ALL RIGHT. I SEE. ARE THERE ANY OBJECTIONS TO MOVING THIS FORWARD TO COUNTY COUNCIL FOR FURTHER THEM? NO OBJECTION.

[11. RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE USE OF TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES FOR A CONTRACT AWARD TO W.M. ROEBUCK, INC. FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A TEMPORARY WOOD POLE TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT THE INTERSECTION OF US 278 AND CROSSTREE DRIVE/GATEWAY DRIVE (WINDMILL HARBOUR) USING SCDOT'S STATEWIDE CONTRACT (FISCAL IMPACT: $500,000.00)]

IT WILL MOVE FORWARD TO COUNTY COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL AND MOVE MOVING INTO AGENDA ITEM 11 RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE USE OF TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES FOR A CONTRACT AWARD TO W.M. ROEBUCK INC. FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A TEMPORARY WOOD POLE TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT THE INTERSECTION OF U.S. 278 AND CROSS TREE DRIVE GATEWAY DRIVE IN FRONT THE WINDMILL HARBOR USING NCDOT STATEWIDE CONTRACT AND THE FISCAL IMPACT WILL BE $500,000 WHICH WOULD LEAD UP TO UP TO $500,000. IT DOES SAY IN THE ITEM THAT YEAH I'LL MAKE A MOTION OUTSIDE OF YOUR SECOND SECOND SCREEN WHERE YOU DISCUSS AND IT'LL BE ME. WE'RE FAST TRACKING THIS BECAUSE AS MANY OF YOU KNOW THE WINDMILL HARBOR TRAFFIC ISSUE HAS BEEN GOING ON FOR MANY, MANY YEARS AND WITH THE ADDITIONAL DELAYS OF THE 270 BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION OUT THERE REACHED OUT TO SECRETARY HALL WITH THE SECOND DEPARTMENT TRANSPORTATION AND SHE CONSENTED TO ALLOW US TO GO AHEAD AND INSTALL A TEMPORARY SIGNAL IN MY HARBOR BECAUSE ONCE WE DO GET THE BRIDGE UNDERWAY IT'S GOING TO BE A FIVE YEAR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT AND WE SIMPLY COULD NOT I'LL ASK THE FOLKS THAT LIVE AT WINDMILL HARBOR TO WAIT ANY LONGER TO TRY TO GET OUT OF THEIR SUBDIVISION AND SO THIS HAS BEEN A LONG TIME COMING.

I OTHER PREVIOUS INDIVIDUALS HAVE FAILED TO DELIVER TO THIS COMMUNITY AND I'M THANKFUL, JARED AND ERIC FOR FAST TRACKING THIS AND EXPEDITING THIS THE D.O.T. REVIEW PROCESS AND GETTING THE CONTRACTOR ON BOARD HERE SO THAT WHENEVER WE DO GET OUR APPROVALS WE CAN GET STARTED ON THAT INSTALLATION. ANY QUESTIONS AS A QUESTION? YES, MR. GREENWAY SO IS THERE I KNOW WE'RE STILL DOING THE 270 BRIDGE PROJECT BUT WHY ARE WE EVENTUALLY GOING TO PUT A MASTER ARM HERE? SO WHY DON'T WE JUST JUMP AND DO THAT AND NOT DO THE TIMBER BECAUSE THE MAST ARMS CAN'T GO UNTIL WE DO THE IMPROVEMENTS TO TO SET THE ROAD.

YEAH BECAUSE WOULD BE TOO THEY WOULD THE MAST ARM TO BE TOO FAR BACK FROM THE ROAD CURRENTLY. OKAY YEAH. JUST A QUICK COMMENT I WANT TO

[00:20:02]

MEMBERS OF THE EXECUTIVE STAFF AND THE ENGINEERING STAFF FOR MOVING THIS ALONG.

IT'S BEEN ABOUT TEN YEARS ACTUALLY THEY'VE BEEN NEGOTIATING TRY AND GET A LIGHT OUT THERE AND I THINK THAT IT'S SAFE TO SAY THAT IT WILL MAKE THE GATEWAY AFTER YOU LEAVE THE BRIDGE A LOT SAFER AND IT WILL FINALLY GIVE THE OF WINDMILL HARBOR A SAFER ENTRY AND EXIT FROM THEIR COMMUNITY BECAUSE IN TRAFFIC IN THE MORNING EVENING IN PARTICULAR IT'S A DASH FOR FREEDOM SPACE AND SOONER OR LATER THAT'S GOING TO BE A TRAGEDY.

SO THANKS FOR THE EXTRA EFFORT. THANKS FOR GETTING YOU OUT OF THE OTHER PROJECT AND MAKING IT A SEPARATE PROJECT. I KNOW THAT EVERYONE OVER THERE IS VERY GRATEFUL FOR THIS TO BE FAST TRACKED LIKE THIS BECAUSE THEY SIMPLY WAITED SO LONG. SO I ENTHUSIASTICALLY SUPPORT THIS SCHEME I WANT TO ECHO THE SAME THING LARRY JUST SAID BECAUSE IT'S IT'S BEEN ON THE AGENDA FOR ME SINCE I GOT ON COUNCIL SO I'M GLAD TO SEE SOME RESOLUTION COMING TO TO ASSIST THAT AREA SO I JUST WANT TO ECHO WOULD JUST LIKE TO SAY THANK YOU.

THANK YOU. MR. GRAHAM, ARE THERE ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS OR DISCUSSION I'D LIKE FOR THE RECORD TO SAY SINCE I'VE BEEN ON COUNCIL AND I THINK IT WAS TEN YEARS BUT NO TO NINE YEARS YEAH RIGHT YEAH SAYING NO NO FURTHER QUESTIONS OR DISCUSSION OR IS THERE ANY OBJECTION TO MOVE THIS FORWARD TO COUNTY COUNCIL. OH I THOUGHT WE ALREADY DID.

CAN WE GET A MOTION A SECOND OF WHAT WE'RE DOING AT A SECOND.

YEAH I THOUGHT WE DID GET IT. YEAH, YEAH. OKAY FORWARD TO MY YEAH THAT GOES FOR TONIGHT. OKAY THANK YOU YOUR TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE SO YEAH I KNOW.

[12. RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE USE OF TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES FOR A CONTRACT AWARD TO W.M. ROEBUCK, INC. FOR IFB #053123 CONSTRUCTION OF MAST ARM INTERSECTION AT BLUFFTON PARKWAY, FLAY CREEK DR, AND RIVER RIDGE DR (FISCAL IMPACT: $384,984.60)]

YEAH. ALL RIGHT. ONCE AGAIN SEEING NO OBJECTION TO US TO MOVE FORWARD AGAIN COUNTY COUNCIL ITEM 12 RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE USE OF TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES FOR A CONTRACT AWARD TO W.M.

ROEBUCK INC. FOR IFB NUMBER 2053123 CONSTRUCTION OF MAST ARM AT BLUFFTON PARKWAY, FLAKE CREEK DRIVE AND RIVER RIVER RIDGE DRIVE AND IT DOES A FISCAL IMPACT $384,984.60.

OKAY DO WE HAVE A MOTION OF SECOND MOVE RIGHT HERE? GET A SECOND CAN WE GET A SECOND ON THAT? I'LL SECOND IT. THIS IS RIGHT NEAR ME.

ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE ANY DISCUSSIONS OR ANY PRESENTATION ON THIS PARTICULAR ITEM I JUST GAVE A GOOD UPDATE. YEAH THIS SO THIS INTERSECTION WHILE WE WAITED TEN YEARS FOR THE OTHER ONE THIS ONE IS GETTING TWO SIGNATURES IN ABOUT A YEAR.

SO THE FIRST ONE WENT IN LAST YEAR IT WAS A WOOD PULL SIGNAL SO SIMILAR WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO DO IN THE HARBOR WE PUT THE WHEN WE PUT WOOD PULSE SIGNAL IN JUST BECAUSE OF THE VICINITY TO THE SCHOOL TO TRY TO GET KIDS ACROSS AND GET PARENTS OUT OF THAT INTERSECTION.

IT WAS A WARRANTED SIGNALS YOU DIDN'T HAVE TO JUMP THROUGH THROUGH ANY SPECIAL HOOPS ON THAT ONE. SO IS TO PUT THE MAST ARM SIGNAL IN THERE'S JUST SUCH A LEAD TIME TO GET THOSE MAST ARMS IN THOSE POLLS IN THAT WE DID THIS IN TWO SEPARATE BITES.

SO THE IDEA OF BRINGING THIS FORWARD RIGHT NOW IS THE CONSTRUCTION ON THIS INTERSECTION WOULD HAPPEN OVER CHRISTMAS BREAK THIS UPCOMING YEAR.

SO WITH VERY LITTLE TO THE SCHOOL AT RIVER RIDGE ACADEMY THAT'S THE IDEA ON THIS ONE SO AGAIN IS TO TAKE DOWN THE MAST SIGNAL AND TO PUT UP THE ACTUAL PERMANENT OR TAKE DOWN PULL SIGNAL PUT UP THE MAST FROM SIGNAL BUT I DO HAVE ONE QUESTION WHAT ARE DECORATIVE TRAFFIC SIGNALS POLL OF POLLS A POLL ARE WE PAYING EXTRA FOR HAVING A DECORATIVE SO YEAH IT IT MATCHES THE OTHER POLLS THAT WE HAVE ON BLUFFTON PARKWAY AND BUCKWALTER WHICH ARE THE BLACKFOOT POLLS THAT'S THE IDEA SO THEY'RE THEY'RE JUST THEY'RE POWDER BLACK THAT THEY'RE FLUTED IN THE ON THE POLE SO THAT'S WHY THEY'RE DECORATIVE. OKEYDOKE.

ALL RIGHT. ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS OR? DISCUSSION THAT I SEE.

AND DON, IS THERE ANY OBJECTION MOVING THIS FORWARD TO COUNTY COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL?

[13. RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE USE OF TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES FOR A CONTRACT AWARD TO APAC ATLANTIC FOR IFB #062323 SC 170 NEAR-TERM IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF CAPACITY AND SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS FROM OKATIE CENTER SOUTH TO SC 462 ]

NO, NO, I WOULD MOVE TO COUNTY COUNCIL MOVING INTO ITEM AGENDA ITEM 13 RECOMMEND THE APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE USE OF TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES FOR A CONTRACT AWARD TO EIGHT PACK ATLANTIC FOR IFB 062323 SC 170 NEAR TERM IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF CAPACITY AND SAFETY FROM OKATIE CENTER SOUTH TO SC FOR 62 FISCAL IMPACT 8,111,030 YEAH SORRY HE MAY NOT KNOW THE FACTS ABOUT THE PLAY A LITTLE MORE YEAH A LITTLE MORE NAME IT. ALL RIGHT IS ANYBODY KNOW ME PRESENTING ON THIS MARTIN SO THIS IS THE LONG AWAITED 117 YEAR TERM PROJECT. SO AGAIN TO LOOK AT THESE SPOT IMPROVEMENTS WHERE WE'RE TALKING ABOUT A BIGGER AT SOME POINT ALONG 170 BUT THE IDEA ON

[00:25:04]

THIS PROJECT THAT WE WERE GOING TO ENTER INTO A COST SHARE WITH THE CITY OF HARTSVILLE AND JASPER COUNTY TO ADDRESS SOME OF THE SAFETY CAPACITY CONCERNS AT SPOT LOCATIONS ALONG 70 FROM OKATIE CENTER SOUTH TO 462 SO I CAN RUN THROUGH ANY OF THE DETAILS THAT YOU ALL WANT BUT REALLY IT'S TO ADD SAFETY CAPACITY TO THE KEY INTERSECTION IS ALONG THE WAY THIS IS WE ARE ALSO INCORPORATING A PORTION OF SCHEDULED D.O.T. WORK UP ON TOP OF 278 AS WELL AS THE RAMPS TO ADDRESS BETTER LANE UTILIZATION UP ON TOP OF BRIDGE CURRENTLY AS YOU THE LOOP RAMP FROM 170 AROUND A TO 78 YOU HAVE TO MERGE INTO TRAFFIC WE'RE GOING TO GET THAT RE STRIPED SO YOU JUST FLOW ON THERE THERE WOULD BE NO LONGER A MERGE POINT UP ON TOP OF THE BRIDGE SO AGAIN WILL WITH LANE UTILIZATION WILL HELP WITH FLOW POTENTIALLY HELP WITH CRASHES. SO AGAIN WITH THAT I'LL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS OR ANY QUESTIONS. YOU KNOW I THINK WE TALKED ABOUT THIS FOR A COUPLE OF YEAH WE'VE SEEN THIS A COUPLE OF SO IT JUST MOVING FORWARD WITH IT .

YES, SIR. YES, SIR. THE THE THE PLANS HAVE BEEN BEEN DONE. THEY'VE BEEN APPROVED. THEY'VE BEEN PERMITTED.

WE WORKED OUT A SHARE AGREEMENT WITH NCDOT ON THEIR PORTION AND WE'RE JUST READY TO MOVE FORWARD ON THE PROJECT. ALL RIGHT. READY FOR FURTHER DISCUSSION JUST SLIGHTLY GOODNESS. YEAH. NEED MORE TIME WITH NO FURTHER DISCUSSION THIS WILL MOVE FORWARD TO COUNTY IS THERE ANY OBJECTION TO MOVING FORWARD TO

[14. RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH SCDOT FOR PAVEMENT OVERLAY AND PAVEMENT MARKING IMPROVEMENTS ON US278 AND INTERCHANGE RAMPS TO BE INCLUDED IN THE SC170 NEAR-TERM IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT IN THE COUNTY]

COUNTY COUNCIL FOR FULL APPROVAL? NO.

RIGHT. AND THAT MOVES INTO OUR NEXT AGENDA.

I DON'T I BELIEVE YOU ALREADY TOUCHED ON IT IN YOUR PRESENTATION.

I WOULD RECOMMEND RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL INTER AGREEMENT WITH NCDOT FOR PAVEMENT OVERLAY AND MARKING IMPROVEMENTS ON U.S. 278 AND INTERCHANGE RAMPS TO BE INCLUDED IN THE C 170 NEAR TERM IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT IN THE COUNTY CAN I GET A MOTION A SECOND OPEN DISCUSSION I'LL MAKE THE MOTION ALL RIGHT ANY QUESTIONS I BELIEVE YOU TOUCHED ON IT. YEAH, IT'S PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD. WE'RE JUST MOVING UP. WE'RE ABLE TO EXPEDITE THEIR PROJECT THAT THEY HAD PLANNED LAST YEAR INTO OUR PROJECT AGAIN BECAUSE THE TWO PROJECTS MARY TOGETHER SO WELL IT MADE A LOT OF SENSE TO BRING THOSE TWO TOGETHER I FEEL BETTER.

SORRY. YEAH NO PROBLEM. JUST WANT TO CIRCLE BACK TO 13.

IS THAT A 13 TIMES 2012. WELL THIS TIME SENSITIVE SO IN THE THAT YOU MAKE WHEN YOU'RE GOING AND THAT IS HAPPENING THAT YOU NEED TO SAY THAT YOU WANTED MOVE FORWARD TONIGHT AS A CONFERENCE ITEM AND THAT'S THE THE CONTRACT FOR W AND ROEBUCK YES IT'S THE MASTER AND THAT WAS IT THAT WAS THE GENTLEMAN 1212 AND SO THAT IS A TIME SENSITIVE MATTER TO MOVE FORWARD COUNTY COUNCIL TONIGHT. YES. OKAY.

GOT YOU WITHIN 30 DAYS FIRST IT'S LIKE IT IS NUMBER 13 SPEAKING AND I DIDN'T I DIDN'T MAKE A NOTE OF THAT SORRY NUMBER 30 I THOUGHT IT WAS THAT 14 NOW THAT'S FOR YOU FOR 14 IN WRITING I DO NOT I THINK GERALD YOU WERE ON 13 OH YOU NEED A MOTION, MR. GLOVER.

I'LL TAKE IT. I'VE MOTION THIS NUMBER 13, RIGHT? YEAH, YEAH, YEAH. THAT'S THAT'S I'M STILL WORKING ON FOR A LONG TIME.

DID YOU SAY I'LL HAVE BEEN SECONDED TO THANK YOU NOW WE GOT SORRY PARTNER THEY ONLY

[15. RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A REQUEST FOR PRIVATE ROAD ACCEPTANCE OF MASTER’S WAY]

SECOND MEETINGS ARE GET IT DOWN NOW WE'RE MOVING INTO 15 CORRECT ALL WHICH IS RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A REQUEST FOR PRIVATE ROAD OF MASTER'S WAY CAN I GET A MOTION A SECOND TO OPEN DISCUSSION? YEAH. TOM MOTIONED THAT COULD I A SECOND? I'LL SECOND IT. OKAY.

MAY I GO IN? IS THERE GOING TO BE A PRESENTATION ON THIS ONE MR. VALENCE YEAH, JUST SHORT OF SOME BACKGROUND SO MASTER'S WAY I THINK THERE'S A DIAGRAM BUT IF NOT I THINK I CAN DESCRIBE IT PRETTY WELL SO. MASTER'S WAY IS A SHORT ROAD ABOUT A HALF MILE LONG IN BETWEEN BUT BLUFFTON PARKWAY AND 18 MCCRACKEN WHICH IS RIGHT NEXT TO HILTON HEAD CHRISTIAN WHERE THEY JUST BUILT THEIR NEW FACILITY HERE RECENTLY.

SO OVER TIME THAT PROPERTY AS IT WAS DEVELOPED I BELIEVE WITH THE PINE PROPERTY IT WAS NEVER DEEDED TOWARDS COUNTY AND FELL INTO OPEN LAND TRUST AS PART OF THE HILTON CHRISTIAN FOR THEN DEVELOP THAT AND MAKE ACCESS ONTO THAT ROAD THEY PURCHASED THAT AND THEY HAVE FULLY DEVELOPED THEIR SITE AS WELL AS MADE A SIGNAL THAT WAS PART OF THEIR TRAFFIC IMPACT THAT MASTER'S WAY IN BLUFFTON PARKWAY SO IN IN ACTION WITH OUR POLICY STATEMENT AND 17

[00:30:07]

ABOUT THIS EVIDENCE OF PRIVATE ROADS OUR ROAD ACCEPTANCE POLICY FOR FOLKS TO PETITION COUNTY TO ACCEPT THE ROADS AND WE HAVE A FULL POLICY LAID OUT IN THE PROCEDURES SO THEY MADE AN APPLICATION TO PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PUBLIC WORKS WENT OUT THERE AND EVALUATED IT AND THEN WE MAKE A RECOMMENDATION FROM STAFF COMMITTEE AND COUNCIL ON THE SUBSTANCE OF THAT ROAD. SO UPON EVALUATION THE ROAD IS IN DECENT SHAPE.

THERE WILL NEED TO BE SOME MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES IN THE FUTURE YEARS BUT IN GENERAL THIS IS A A ROAD CONNECTING ROAD THAT IS CONNECTING COUNTY OWNED PUBLIC BLUFFTON PARKWAY TO COUNTY OWNED AT MCCRACKEN THAT HAS PATHWAYS ON ONE SIDE AND IS A PAVED CONDITION.

SO WITH THAT WITH THE EVALUATION IN THE FIELD AND THE BACKGROUND ON THE ROAD WE FEEL LIKE IT IS A COMPLEMENT TO OUR COUNTY OWNED SYSTEM PUBLICLY USED INFRASTRUCTURE AND MAY RECOMMENDATION COMMITTEE THAT THIS BE ADOPTED AND ACCEPTED INTO OUR INVENTORY.

ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS MR. FREEMAN I HAVE ONE, YES. HAS THIS BEEN SINCE I'M THE LIAISON CTSI ARE THEY AWARE OF THIS SINCE IT SAYS HERE WE ANTICIPATE REHABILITATION IN THE NEXT 3 TO 5 YEARS BECAUSE NO WE HAVEN'T THIS TO CTSI SO MORE THAN LIKELY WHAT WE WOULD DO IS WE WOULD IN THE NEXT ITERATION OF OUR EVALUATION OF OUR ROAD NETWORK WE WOULD CAPTURE THIS ROAD AND THEN IT WOULD FALL INTO THE SEQUENCE OF WHATEVER OUR FIVE YEAR RESURFACING PLAN WOULD BE BECAUSE I PRESUME WHEN 3 TO 5 YEARS WHEN WE HAVE TO REHABILITATE IT WHICH IS A WEIRD WORD BUT IT'S GOING TO COME OUT OF COUNTY MONEY THROUGH THE CTS YES SO BASED OFF OUR TAG USER FEE THAT WE'RE JUST TALKING ABOUT THERE CTSI PREFERS TO PUT IT TOWARDS RESURFACING SO MORE THAN LIKELY IT WOULD COME THROUGH CTSI WHEN IT'S TIME FOR ANY AND REHABILITATION CAN BE ANYTHING FROM A SMALL IN LIFT OF ASPHALT OR PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE TO A FULL MILL AND FIELD TYPE OPERATION.

SO THIS IS IN RELATIVELY GOOD SHAPE AND HAS LOW VOLUME OF TRAFFIC AS FAR AS THE TYPE OF VEHICLES THAT BEING USED. SO THE REHABILITATION IS AND I THINK PUBLIC WORKS HAD A $100,000 ESTIMATED BUT SO IT'S IN RELATIVELY GOOD SHAPE. ALL RIGHT.

THANK YOU BY. ANY MORE QUESTIONS OR DISCUSSION SAYING NON IS THERE ANY OBJECTION TO MOVING THIS FORWARD TO COUNTY COUNCIL? NO SEEING NO OBJECTION THIS MOVE WILL MOVE FORWARD TO COUNTY COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL AND INTO ITEM 16 RECOMMEND APPROVAL

[16. RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT AWARD FOR RFP 050923 DISPOSAL AND RECYCLING SERVICES FOR CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION DEBRIS AND BULKY WASTE FOR BEAUFORT COUNTY TO WASTE MANAGEMENT]

OF THE CONTRACT AWARD FOR RFP 050923 DISPOSAL RECYCLING SERVICES FOR CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION DEBRIS AND BULKY WASTE FROM COUNTY THE WASTE MANAGEMENT FISCAL IMPACT $250,000. CAN I GET A MOTION IN A SECOND TO OPEN THIS UP FOR DISCUSSION? I'LL MAKE THE MOTION. MR. CHANCELLOR AND MR. REYNOLDS ARE GOING TO BE PRESENTING ON THIS ITEM AS WELL OR NOT NEAL AFTERNOON CHAIRMAN AND COMMITTEE MEMBER SO BEFORE USE THE ADVERTISE FOR THE RFP TO AWARD CONTRACT FOR WHAT IS CALLED C AND D CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION ITEMS AS WELL AS BULKY ITEMS THAT COME TO SOLID WASTE CONVENIENCE CENTERS AND BASED QUANTITIES THAT WE HAVE ESTIMATED WE ARE LOOKING AT JUST LITTLE BIT OVER 9000 TONS.

THIS IS A UNIT RATE CONTRACT AND THE PREFERRED RECOMMENDED AWARD IS WASTE MANAGEMENT.

TO CONTINUE THAT SERVICE CONTRACT WOULD BE FOR THREE YEARS WITH TWO ADDITIONAL ONE YEAR TERMS AND A TOTAL OF FIVE YEARS. DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, ANY DISCUSSION ABOUT THIS DEAL? OKAY. SEEING NO FURTHER QUESTIONS OR DISCUSSION WE CAN MOVE THAT CAN WE MOVE THIS FORWARD WITHOUT OBJECTION THE COUNTY COUNCIL

[17. RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF CONTRACT AWARDS FOR RFP 051023 (YARD WASTE RECYCLING) TO BE DIVIDED BETWEEN GREEN RECYCLE RESOURCES AND OLIVER’S CLEAN BURN]

YES. YES. IT WILL MOVE FORWARD TO COUNTY COUNCIL YOU ITEM 17 IS RECOMMENDATION OF AWARD FOR RFP 051023 YARD WASTE RECYCLING FOR COUNTY APPROXIMATE $185,000 IMPACT FISCAL IMPACT I SEE YOU STILL STANDING THERE.

THEY'RE GOING TO BE PRESENTING ON THIS ONE. YES, SIR.

ANY QUESTIONS OR BEFORE WE START? SO THIS IS FOR THE RECYCLING OUR OUR YARD WASTE THAT ALSO COMES TO OUR CONVENIENCE CENTER CURRENTLY.

THE CONTRACT IS UP FOR RENEWAL AND WE HAVE TWO VENDORS WE'RE LOOKING TO ADD TWO MORE VENDORS THAT'S LISTED THERE. THE GOAL WOULD BE TO HAVE SOME FLEXIBILITY IN OPERATIONS IF WE HAD TO MICROBREWERY OR STORAGE TO HAVE TWO VENDORS AND TO PROVIDE THEM SOME ADDITIONAL SERVICES IF WE WERE IMPACTED BY THOSE TYPE OF STORMS. FUNDING IS AVAILABLE IN THE

[00:35:05]

SOLID WASTE AND I'M TRYING TO MAKE A NOTE OF IT DID WE GET A MOTION AT SECOND ON THAT ONE? I'M SORRY CAN WE GET A MOTION AND A SECOND I'LL MAKE THE MOTION CHAIRMAN.

I'LL SECOND IT. ALL RIGHT. GOTCHA.

THANK YOU. ARE THERE ANY ANY QUESTIONS OR DISCUSSION NOW KIND OF QUESTION DO ANY OF THE MISS POUNDS TAG ON TO THIS CONTRACT? IS THIS STRICTLY COUNTY? STRICTLY COUNTY BUT IF THEY WISH TO THEY COULD BE ADDED THEY'D HAVE TO WORK IT OUT WITH CURRENT CURBSIDE PROVIDER HOW HOW ALL THAT RELATES YES MA'AM .

ALL RIGHT. IS THERE ANY OBJECTION TO MOVE THIS FORWARD TO COUNTY COUNCIL ? I DON'T NEED TO LOOK IT DOES A FORWARD TO COUNTY COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL ON THE OKAY. ALL RIGHT SO IT IS PASSED AND IT RIGHT ITEM 18 IS

[Items 18 & 19]

RECOMMENDATION AWARD RFP 030723 DEBRIS MANAGEMENT CONTRACTING SERVICES AND A C OR YES AND CROWDER GULF SECONDARY CONTRACTOR WE DO HAVE THE PRESENTER AS JERRY FREILICH BUT ARE YOU GOING TO BE PRESENTING 19 AGAIN? WE CAN DO OKAY.

OH, CAN I GET A MOTION IN A SECOND TO DO 18 AND 19 TOGETHER? I'LL MAKE THE MOTION. OH, SECOND, MR. CHAIRMAN. THANK YOU.

SO CHAIRMAN 18 IT INVOLVES ENGAGING WITH A CONTRACTOR. IF THERE WAS A NAME STORM OR A SIGNIFICANT THAT WOULD BE COMING TO THE AREA. OUR PRIMARY SELECTION WOULD BE SERIES AND THE SECONDARY WOULD BE CROWDER GULF IF WE HAD TO ENGAGE A SECOND CONTRACTOR ITEM NUMBER 19 IS ASSOCIATED WITH THE DEBRIS CONTRACTOR WHICH WOULD BE MONITORING EITHER OF THESE CONTRACTORS. WE WOULD ENGAGE PER FIELD REQUIREMENTS THAT WOULD BE REQUIRED THAT WE COULD BE FULLY REIMBURSED GOING WOULD BE EXPENSIVE IF THERE'S A BIG STORM STRIKE ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS? I HAVE ONE FOR MY OWN PERSONAL INFORMATION. CAN YOU BRIEFLY EXPLAIN TO ME THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AIR CURTAIN INCINERATE OR WHICH I BELIEVE I'VE SEEN ON DEVELOPMENT VERSUS CONTROLLED OPEN BURNING WHICH IS WHAT WE LITERALLY SANDUSKY CAN YOU JUST TELL ME WHEN DO YOU DECIDE WHICH ONE? SO THE DIFFERENT PERMITTING PROCESS FOR BOTH OF THOSE EFFORTS OPEN BURN IS BASICALLY A FIELD THAT'S BEEN DESIGNATED THAT DRIVERS AND THEY THEY START TO BURN WITH THAT WHAT THE HECK IS LOOKING AT THAT THINGS OF PROXIMITY TO AIRPORTS THINGS OF THAT NATURE THE AIR STATION AND SO FORTH AND ON THOSE DESIGNATED SITES ARE PREDETERMINED BY DEQ AND THE COUNTY AND SO WE MAKE SURE THAT WE GET APPROVAL WE CAN DO EITHER THOSE OF THE OTHER ONE THAT YOU MENTIONED THE AIR CURTAIN THAT'S ACTUALLY A MACHINE THAT COMES IN TO PROVIDE MORE OF A CONTROLLED BURN WHERE THERE'S LESS OF SMOKE ASH TYPE OF THOSE THINGS THEN THAT'S THE THING I SEE IT'S LIKE A BIG SHOOT TO TIME SEGMENT GOES WAY UP. YEAH. OKAY THANK YOU.

ANY MORE QUESTIONS? ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION AT CNN? IS THERE ANY OBJECTION TO MOVING THIS FORWARD TO COUNTY COUNCIL WITH FULL APPROVAL? YEAH.

[20. RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT AWARD TO BEAUFORT CONSTRUCTION OF SC, LLC TO CONSTRUCT A WAREHOUSE EXPANSION OF THE VOTERS REGISTRATION BUILDING ON 15 JOHN GALT ROAD]

ALL RIGHT. BOTH 1819 WILL BE MOVED FORWARD TO THE COUNTY COUNCIL APPROVAL . THANK YOU. AND MOVING INTO AGENDA ITEM 20 APPROVAL OF CONTRACT AWARD OF YEAR FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SCC LLC CONSTRUCTION SERVICES TO CONSTRUCT A WAREHOUSE EXPANSION OF THE VOTERS BUILDING ON 15 JOHN GALT ROAD CAN I GET A MOTION SECOND TO OPEN THIS UP? SO MOVED ON SECOND RIGHT AND MR. LAWSON IS REPRESENTING YOU SIR GOOD AFTERNOON. THIS IS A PROJECT TO WARD A CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF AN EXPANSION OF THE VOTERS REGISTRATION BUILDING ON JOHN GALT IT'S ABOUT AN 1800 SQUARE FOOT ADDITION OF FAMILIAR WITH THE BUILDING. THERE IS ALREADY A WAREHOUSE SPACE ON THE BACK AND THIS IS SIMPLY TO THAT NOT QUITE DOUBLE IN SIZE BUT ALMOST BEFORE CONSTRUCTION WAS OUR ONE AND ONLY BIDDER AND THEIR COST WAS SORRY MY TABLE ROTATED ONLY 358,000. WE ARE ASKING FOR A 10% CONTINGENCY THAT COVERS CHANGE ORDERS OR ANYTHING THAT WOULD NORMALLY HAPPEN. THAT 10% THRESHOLD IS THE AMOUNT WE CAN GO UP TO BEFORE WE HAVE TO COME BACK TO COUNCIL FOR A REVOTE.

SO WE'RE RECOMMENDING THAT CONTRACT TO BE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SOUTH CAROLINA.

I'LL BE HAPPY TO TAKE ANY CAMERON JUST TO KIND OF REMIND THE PUBLIC IF I'M REMEMBERING CORRECT THIS IS JUST FOR VOTING EQUIPMENT. YEAH, THEY NOT ONLY STORE THEIR EQUIPMENT AS I WALK THE SITE WITH THEM AND LEARN THEIR OPERATION THEY WORK, CALIBRATE AND PROGRAM THE MACHINES AS WELL IN THEIR CURRENT WAREHOUSES CRAMMED FULL

[00:40:03]

OF EQUIPMENT THEY HAVE NO ROOM TO MOVE TO MOVE SO SO THEY HAVE TO PULL THEIR MACHINES INTO A DIFFERENT ROOM ONE AT A TIME. AND SO THIS GIVES THEM A LITTLE BIT OPPORTUNITY TO SPREAD OUT DO MULTIPLE MACHINES AT ONCE. ARE THERE ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS THIS EQUIPMENT WILSON YOU MENTIONED IT THE BEFORE CONSTRUCTION IS THE ONLY THE SOLE BUSINESS.

YES, SIR. WHAT'S GOING ON? WE WE ADVERTISE FOR PURCHASING DEPARTMENT ASSISTED WITH THIS OBVIOUSLY WE ADVERTISED IN MULTIPLE VENUE, DIFFERENT TRADE ORGANIZATIONS THAT HAVE WEBSITES AND LISTSERVS AS WELL. LET'S PUT IT ON OUR WEBSITE.

WE HAVE THE VENDOR REGISTRY PROGRAM WHERE. ALL OF THE PRE-REGISTERED VENDORS THAT NORMALLY BE WORK WITH US, GET ANNOUNCEMENTS SENT DIRECTLY TO THEM.

THIS IS THE ONLY BID WE GOT. IT'S JUST RIGHT NOW THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY IS IS IS VERY BUSY AND THERE'S A SUPPLY AND DEMAND ISSUE AND THE DEMAND IS MUCH HIGHER THAN THE SUPPLY WHEN IT COMES TO QUALIFIED CONTRACTORS. SO THIS IS THE ONLY ONE WE GOT SO SMALL PROJECT AND YOU KNOW IT'S A COMMENT YOU KNOW THIS IS A IN MY OPINION AN IMPORTANT ACCOMMODATION FOR THEM. THEIR MACHINES OVER THERE ARE SOMETIMES STACKED TWO AND THREE LEVELS HIGH SO SPREADING OUT LIKE THAT WILL CERTAINLY SIMPLIFY THINGS FOR THEM AND IT'S NOT GOING TO AFFECT THE SECURITY OF THE OPERATIONS. THIS EXPANSION THE SECURITY ISSUES WON'T CHANGE BECAUSE OF THE EXPANSION CONTROLS. I MEAN RIGHT.

EVERYTHING YES. SECURITY IS THERE. I'M SORRY TO INTERRUPT WHERE THE EXPANSION COMES RIGHT OFF THE EXISTING BUILDING. THERE'S CURRENTLY A SINGLE TRUCK DOCK AND WE'RE ACTUALLY REMOVING THAT DOCK AND MOVING IT TO THE SIDE WITH THIS PROJECT SO THERE'S ACTUALLY NO IN CONTROL. THE BUILDING WILL HAVE THE SAME CONTROL IT'S GOT NOW AS FAR SECURITY. SO ANY MORE QUESTIONS OR DISCUSSION SAYING NON IS HAS ANY OBJECTION TO MOVE FORWARD TO COUNTY COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL

[21. RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT AWARD TO C.E. BOURNE & CO., INC. FOR CONSTRUCTION SERVICES TO RENOVATE THE INTERIOR AND INSTALL A NEW HVAC SYSTEM IN THE MC RILEY POOL IN BLUFFTON]

NO NO THIS WILL FORWARD TO COUNTY GOVERNMENT WORKER GENDER ITEM 21 APPROVAL OF CONTRACT AWARD TO SEABORNE AND COMPANY INC. FOR CONSTRUCTION SERVICES TO RENOVATE THE INTERIOR AND INSTALL A NEW AC SYSTEM IN THE L.C. REILLY POOL BLUFFTON MR. CAN I GET A MOTION IN A SECOND? OPEN DISCUSSION SO MOVE SECOND AND MR. LAWSON YES THIS IS ALSO A CONTRACT CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDED B AWARD TO SEA BORN A LITTLE BIT OF BACKGROUND ON THIS IF YOU'RE FAMILIAR WITH M.C. RILEY POOL OVER THE LAST YEAR OR THE COUNTY AND WORK TO REPLACE THE ROOF ON THIS REPLACING THE ROOFING AND A LOT OF THE STRUCTURAL STEEL IN THAT CANOPY THIS IS THE SECOND PHASE OF THAT PROJECT AND THAT IS TO INSTALL A NEW HVAC SYSTEM THAT WILL DO A MUCH MORE EFFICIENT JOB. IT'S A MUCH LARGER SYSTEM THAN ONES THAT CURRENTLY EXIST AND THIS WILL ALLOW THEM TO TURN OVER AIR MULTIPLE TIMES AN HOUR TO KEEP THE HUMIDITY DOWN AND TO KEEP THE CHLORINE SMELL DOWN. WITH THIS PROJECT WE'RE ALSO THE OAK, THE SLIDING OPEN DOORS. THIS WILL BE A CLIMATE CONTROLLED SEALED FACILITY AND WE'RE DOING OTHER MINOR UPGRADES, THE RESTROOMS AND SOME OF THE FLOORING SURFACES, THE THE ADMINISTRATIVE AREA OF THE PROJECT WE'RE USING THE OMNI COOPERATIVE SERVICES CONTRACT. THIS IS A CONTRACT THAT GOES OUT STATEWIDE AND MULTIPLE CONTRACTORS WILL PUT IN BIDS. IT'S KIND OF LIKE A STATE CONTRACT BUT IT'S NOT QUITE THE SAME A STATE CONTRACT THEY'LL PUT IN MULTIPLE BIDS AND GET AWARDED BASED ON THEIR PRICES AND SO ATTACHED TO THIS YOU'LL SEE A BREAKDOWN.

IT'S VERY SIMPLE GENERAL BUT SEABOURN HAS PRICED THIS PROJECT USING THE BID ITEMS IN THE BID AMOUNTS UNIT PRICES THAT ARE ALLOWED BY THE OMNIA CONTRACT.

THIS IS ANOTHER TOOL IN OUR TOOLBOX THAT HAS BEEN APPROVED BY COUNCIL IN THE PAST AND.

IT ALLOWS US TO ENTER INTO CONTRACT WITH CONTRACTORS ESPECIALLY WHEN THE SCOPE IS UNKNOWN AS THIS ONE IS BECAUSE THIS PROJECT WILL PROBABLY HAVE CHANGES ON THE FLY AS WE GO THROUGH DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SEABORNE. ONE LAST THING SEABOURN WAS ALSO HIRED THROUGH THE OMNIA PROCESS TO DO STRUCTURAL ROOF EARLIER LAST YEAR SO IT MAKES THEM A LOGICAL PERSON TO CONTINUE TO PARTNER WITH ON THIS PHASE TWO OF THIS PROJECT.

ANY QUESTIONS, COMMENTS JUST SEEMS LIKE WE'RE SPENDING A LOT OF MONEY TODAY.

YEAH SENATE AND THE COUNCIL TO I KNOW OUR MOTION TO TAKE THE FIRST QUESTION OKAY ALL RIGHT SEEING NO FURTHER DISCUSSION OR QUESTIONS IS THERE ANY OBJECTION TO MOVE THIS FORWARD TO COUNTY COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL ? NO, I THINK IT WAS TIME GOING

[22. RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT AWARD TO TITAN CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION SERVICES TO CONSTRUCT PHASE 1 REPAIRS TO THE SPANISH MOSS TRAIL BRIDGE NEAR County Council Agenda – Beaufort County, SC THE TECHNICAL COLLEGE OF THE LOWCOUNTRY ON BATTERY CREEK]

TO DO A GLOVER AND GLOVER TO JAN ON 22 IS THE APPROVAL OF CONTRACT AWARD TO TITAN CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION SERVICES TO CONSTRUCT PHASE ONE REPAIRS TO THE SPANISH MOSS TRAIL BRIDGE NEAR THE TECHNICAL COLLEGE OF LOWCOUNTRY ROAD BATTERY

[00:45:06]

CREEK. CAN I GET A MOTION A SECOND OVER THIS LIGHT MOTION? SO YOU'RE YEAH. MR. LAWSON, I BELIEVE YOU'RE UP AGAIN.

ANOTHER CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION, THIS ONE TO TITAN CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT.

THEY ARE OUT OF FLORIDA. THEY WERE ONE OF FOUR BIDDERS THAT WE HAD ON THE PROJECT THE SPANISH MOSS TRAIL PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE. THIS IS THE ONE LOCATED CLOSEST TO THE TECHNICAL COLLEGE OF LOWCOUNTRY. IF YOU'RE FAMILIAR WITH THAT SECTION OF THE TRAIL, THE PROJECT IS THREE PHASES. THIS IS THE FIRST OF THREE PHASES THE BRIDGE HAS FIVE POWELL DRIVEN POWELL PIERS IN THE WATER AND THEN TO TWO DRIVEN POWELL IN BALANCE ON THE EMBANKMENT ON EITHER SIDE. SO THE FIRST PHASE IS TO REPAIR THE PILES THAT ARE IN THE WATER. SECOND PHASE IS THE INBOUNDS WHICH WILL GET OUT AT A FUTURE DATE. AND THEN THE THIRD PHASE IS IS A RECONSTRUCTION OF THE TOP DECK WITH HANDRAILS AND OTHER A FISHING PIER OFF OF THAT THE PROJECT AGAIN HAD FOUR BIDDERS TITAN CONSIDERED THE LOW RESPONSIVE BIDDER IN THE AMOUNT OF 172,000 AGAIN STAFF RECOMMENDED A 10% CONTINGENCY TO BE ADDED TO THE BUDGET FOR THAT PROJECT AND WE RECOMMENDED APPROVAL ONE TYPOGRAPHICAL ERROR THIS WILL HAVE FINAL ACTION HERE AT THE COMMITTEE IT DOES NOT GO TO COUNCIL BECAUSE OF THE DOLLAR AMOUNT.

MR. CHAIRMAN, I HAD A QUESTION WHAT WOULD YOU ANTICIPATE THE NEXT IS TO NEXT YEAR OR YES WE'LL BE ABLE TO BID IT AS SOON AS WE GET THIS ONE UNDERWAY WE'LL PROBABLY START WORKING ON THE BID PACKAGE. THE REASON FOR SPLITTING IT UP THIS HAS GONE OUT FOR BID BEFORE AND WE HAD NO RESPONSES AND YOU ALSO SAW IF YOU LOOKED AT THE FOUR BIDDERS THE PRICES ARE ALL OVER THE EACH PHASE IS A SPECIALTY IN CONSTRUCTION DEALING WITH THE PEERS IN THE WATER IS MUCH DIFFERENT THAN THE AMBIANCE AND THE HANDRAIL AND STUFF ON THE DECK.

SO THE PROBLEM WE RAN INTO LAST TIME IS THERE WAS NO CLEAR PRIME CONTRACTOR AND SO WE HAD SUBCONTRACTORS COMPETING AGAINST EACH OTHER TRYING TO BE THE PRIME HERE WITH THE SUB THERE AND SO WE DECIDED TO BREAK IT UP INTO THREE PHASES SO THAT WE GOT SPECIALTY CONTRACTORS. SO AS SOON WE GET THIS ONE UP AND RUNNING AND WE KNOW THE SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION ON IT WE'LL START TO PUT TOGETHER A BID PACKAGE FOR THE BALANCE AND THAT'LL BE LATER IN FISCAL YEAR. THIS NEXT FISCAL YEAR WE HAVE FUNDING FOR ALL THREE PHASES SO WE FEEL GOOD. YOU KNOW I KNEW THIS BRIDGES I KNEW THE OTHER ONE THAT'S TOWARD THE SHOPPING CENTER. YEAH, IT'S THAT BRIDGE ALSO NEED TO BE DONE TOO. I MEAN THEY'RE IN THE SAME LOCATION ON THE SAME RIVER.

I TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION I DO NOT KNOW BUT I'LL BE HAPPY TO GET THAT INFORMATION.

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ACTUALLY IS THE OPERATIONS MAINTENANCE OF THE TRAIL THE REASON THIS GOT HANDED OVER TO CAPITAL PROJECTS OF THE SIZE AND SCALE OF THIS REPAIR OKAY BUT I CAN GET WITH NEIL AND WE CAN GIVE YOU A NOTICE THAT IS ON THE BRIDGE BECAUSE YOU'RE ON THE SAME RIVER JUST FOR THE DOWNSTREAM MR. FOR THIS PROJECT INITIATED FROM A STUDY THAT WAS DONE ONLY OF THIS BRIDGE AND I HAVE THAT REPORT THAT HAD YOU BUT I'D HAVE TO GET WITH NEIL TO SEE IF THERE'S ANYTHING ON THE BRIDGE AND HAPPY TO DO THAT .

I DO BELIEVE THAT THE BRIDGE THAT YOU'RE REFERRING TO IS A HAD SOME REPAIR WORK DONE TO IT A FEW YEARS AGO. GOTCHA. OKAY.

THANK YOU. BUT WE'LL GET WE'LL GET A DEFINITIVE ANSWER AND EMAIL THAT OUT. OKAY. ARE THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR DISCUSSION ON THIS? JANINE SAYING THAT HAS HE AS HE NOTED THERE IS A TYPO IN HERE THIS WILL NOT BE APPROVED FOR TO MOVE A COUNTY COUNCIL HAS TO BE APPROVED HERE DO WE HAVE ANY OBJECTION TO APPROVING THE REPAIRS SAME NO OBJECTION THAT IS APPROVED AND MOVING INTO

[23. RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT AWARD TO LGC GLOBAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT FOR THE JANITORIAL SERVICES FOR BEAUFORT COUNTY RFP 040623]