OF THE TOWN AND YOU HADADADADAD. YEAH, RIGHT NEXT DOOR WAS A ANOTHER LOG BUILDING THAT FOR [00:00:07] ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS THE PROVISIONS OF THE SECTION SHALL NOT APPLY TO FAMILY SUBDIVISIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 16 TO Y 16 DASH 2103 WHY IS THAT AS A SEPARATE SECTION THE AND WHAT IS BEFORE YOU TODAY IS ONLY SIX SECTIONS 16 TO 103 SEVEN. THANK YOU. LET ME GET A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS JUST AS WE GET STARTED HERE. ACTUALLY IT'S WOULD YOU PLEASE DESCRIBE FOR US THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE MAJOR SUBDIVISION IN A MINOR ONE IN TERMS OF , YOU KNOW, HOW YOU GET THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN A MAJOR AND MINOR SUBDIVISION AS PERTAIN TO OUR CODE IS THAT A MAJOR SUBDIVISION WOULD BE MORE THAN FIVE BLOCKS OF RECORD PART OF MAJOR SUBDIVISIONS VERSUS MINOR SUBDIVISIONS. WHEN WE TALK ABOUT THE REPORTING OF A SUBDIVISION OR SUBDIVISION BE DEVIATION TO WHAT YOU HAVE IN FRONT OF YOU TODAY IS THAT THE DEVIATION IS IN CONTROL OF . THIS CHANGE PROCESS WE WILL REVIEW THE NEW MAJOR SUBDIVISION OR RESALE SUBDIVISION SO THAT THE PREVIOUS MAJOR SUBDIVISION IT COULD HAVE OCCURRED TEN YEARS AGO FIVE YEARS AGO AT ANY PREVIOUS POINT IN TIME. WE ARE LOOKING AT EACH THE PARTS OF THE CODE THAT YOU WOULD AS IF IT WAS A FRESH SUBDIVISION TODAY WITH THE DETAIL THAT IS ITEMS OF ONE, TWO, THREE, FOUR AND FIVE AND SO SOME OF MR. VARIANCES UNDERSTAND THIS SO ON FEBRUARY 14TH IT WENT BEFORE TOWN COUNCIL WHO APPROVED DEVIATIONS TO PLATTED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISIONS AND THEN A WEEK LATER THE 21ST OF FEBRUARY THERE WAS A CHANGE OF HEART AND NOW IT'S TITLE DEVIATIONS FROM PREVIOUSLY APPROVED MAJOR SUBDIVISIONS. YES, THE TITLE OF THE CODE IS TO CLARIFY EXACTLY THE SECTION OF THAT CODE BUT IT IS THE READING THE WORDS IN THE SECTION THAT IS WHERE THE INTENT OF OUR CODE IS TO FOLLOW THROUGH WITH THE UPDATE AND SO IN THIS CASE IF IF THERE ARE MORE THAN FIVE LOTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE SUBDIVISION IT'S CONSIDERED TO BE MAJOR AND IT WILL BE REVIEWED AND RESUBMITTED TO THIS PLANNING COMMISSION AND THIS IS FIVE ITEMS COME INTO PLAY DEALING WITH INCREASED BURDENS AND AMENITIES OVERCROWDING, INCREASED NOISE AND TRAFFIC, DECREASED UTILITIES AND MEDICAL BILLS AND INCREASED BURDEN ON THE ROADWAYS. THAT IS CORRECT. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. NO QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME. OKAY, MR. HEAD, I'M JUST IN LAYMAN'S TERMS. WHAT DIDN'T GET RIGHT IN DECEMBER THEY WANT TO FINE TUNE NOW. JUST GENERAL GENERAL PART OF WHEN THIS WAS IN A LARGER PACKAGE OF L.A. AMENDMENTS ON THE PART TO THAT WAS QUESTIONED HERE WAS TIED INTO HOW SPECIFIC YOU ARE. WE ARE LOOKING AT THE SUBDIVISION PROCESS AND SO THIS SECTION BEFORE WHICH IS SECTION 16 DASH 2-1 OF TWO WENT THROUGH TOWN COUNCIL BUT THIS IS THE DETAIL TO THAT AND BY THE DETAIL TO THE LOSS HERE IN SEVEN THE PROPOSED CHANGE THE DETRIMENTS THAT YOU'RE LOOKING AT ARE LISTED IN THE MORE DETAILS HERE THE PREVIOUS SECTION OF THE CODE IF YOU'RE LOOKING AT THE ENTIRE I WOULD JUST SAY THAT SUBDIVISIONS THIS TYPE GO BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION BACK PERIOD SO SO [00:05:07] THERE'S GOING TO BE LESS POTENTIALLY THAT FOR BEFORE US BECAUSE OF THIS BECAUSE NOW IT HAS TO INCLUDE ONE OF THESE DETAILS SO WHY REALLY GET MORE OR LESS BECAUSE OF THIS I DON'T THINK GOING TO CHANGE THE OVERALL VOLUME IT'S JUST THAT WHEN THERE'S AS BEFORE WHEN THERE WAS A CHANGE TO A MAJOR SUBDIVISION IT WAS GOING TO GO THROUGH A PUBLIC PROCESS. SO WHAT DID GET APPROVED LAST NIGHT WAS THE THE OTHER HALF OF THIS THAT GOING TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A PUBLIC HEARING AS A REQUIREMENT THIS IS THE LANGUAGE THAT GOT PULLED FROM THAT AMENDMENT APPROVAL SAT IN IS BEFORE YOU TODAY AND REALLY MAJOR CHANGES WERE TO CLARIFY THAT IT DIDN'T APPLY TO FAMILY SUBDIVISIONS AND THEN TO PROVIDE SOME LANGUAGE AND PROCESS FOR WHAT THE AMENDMENT PROCESS IS FOR MINOR SUBDIVISIONS WHICH ARE THE LAST TWO STATEMENTS AND THEN THE RED LANGUAGE THAT'S BEFORE YOU SHOW THE CHANGES THAT WERE MADE BY TOWN COUNCIL LAST NIGHT SO DOES THAT ANSWER YOUR QUESTION? YEAH THE DEVIL I HAVE NO QUESTION AT THIS TIME THE REAL ONE REFER THE CLARIFICATION WOULD YOU TELL THE COMMISSIONER HOW THE FAMILY SUBDIVISION DIFFERS FROM THESE TWO CATEGORIES THAT MAKE IF YOU GO THROUGH THAT A LITTLE BIT SURE . SO A FAMILY SUBDIVISION DOESN'T HAVE A SIZE CAP IT SO IT DOESN'T HAVE A FAMILY SUBDIVISION HAS TO MEET DIFFERENT SET OF CRITERIA TO BE CONSIDERED THROUGH THAT APPLICATION MECHANISM ALSO THE LANGUAGE FOR FAMILY SUBDIVISIONS IF YOU'RE GOING TO DEVIATE FROM WHAT WAS APPROVED AT THAT FAMILY SUBDIVISION IT WOULD CONVERT BACK TO EITHER A MAJOR OR A MINOR SUBDIVISION OF WHATEVER SIZE WAS IF THE CONDITIONS OF THE FAMILY SUBDIVISION COULD NO LONGER BE MET SUCH AS IF IT SOLD TO SOMEONE THAT DIDN'T MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FROM WHICH THE FAMILY WAS CREATED . SO IT HAS ITS OWN PROCESS BUILT IN SEPARATE SEPARATE DEFINITELY DOESN'T PULL IN THE ROOT OF ALL . SO THERE ANY OTHER COMMENTS ON BEHALF OF THE REALLY PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THIS PARTICULAR AREA. YES. GOOD AFTERNOON, MR. CHAIRMAN. JUST LOOKING AT THE TOWN COUNCIL CONSIDERED THIS LAST NIGHT AND I'VE SUGGESTED THE REVISIONS THAT ARE UP THERE AND IT SHOULD BE TAKEN TO HEART A COUPLE OF THINGS THAT I DIDN'T MENTION ONE THAT DID MENTION THIS. THE IDEA HERE IS TO OWNERS WHO BOUGHT OFF OF A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLAN THAT BEING THE CASE UNTIL THE DEVELOPER HAS CONTRACT WITH YOU OR HAS ACTUALLY SOLD LOSS I THINK YOU OUGHT BE FREE TO MAKE WHATEVER CHANGES THEY WANT TO MAKE BEFORE IT'S FINALIZED I DON'T KNOW THAT YOU WANT TO REQUIRE A DEVELOPER COME BACK THROUGH THIS PROCESS PRIOR TO HAVING SOLD ANY LAWS PRIOR TO ANYBODY ELSE HAVING RELIED ON THE PLAT WAS APPROVED. SO I THINK THAT'S ONE THING TO CONSIDER. ANOTHER IS WHY IS IT LIMITED JUST TO RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISIONS? WE BELIEVE THE SAME PRINCIPLES APPLY TO A COMMERCIAL SUBDIVISION. SO TAKE THOSE TAKE THOSE TWO THINGS THAT ARE CONSIDERATION. THANKS. AND THEN WHAT ELSE CAN YOU COMMENT ON THIS PARTICULAR ITEM ? ALL RIGHT. REMEMBER THE COMMISSION IN TERMS OF WHAT WE NEED TO DO HERE IF WE APPROVE TO GET THIS TOWN COUNCIL THIS ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THESE AMENDMENTS TAKING INTO ACCOUNT WHAT WE'VE JUST HEARD FROM COUNCIL I DON'T KNOW WE'RE PUTTING THE LEGISLATOR LAST BY MAKING IT OTHER THAN REPRESENTING ANY THOUGHTS ALONG THE LINE HERE I HAVE SOME THOUGHTS WHAT WHAT IS STAFF HAVE TO THINK ABOUT THAT MEETING SURE SO THE PROCESS IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO ADD IN FOR HOW YOU WOULD AMEND OR DEVIATE FROM A COMMERCIAL SUBDIVISION WE COULD ADD THAT TO BE THE SAME AS THE PROCESS IDENTIFIED FOR THE DEVIATION FROM A MINOR SUBDIVISION. I ASKED YOU ABOUT THAT AND VIEW THAT AS A MINOR CHANGE. WELL IF YOU READ THE LANGUAGE IT SAYS THAT THE MINOR SUBDIVISION MAY BE MODIFIED OR AMENDED ONLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT PROCEDURES AND STANDARDS ESTABLISHED FOR THE CREATION SO THAT'S WHAT WE HAVE FOR MINOR SUBDIVISION IN THIS [00:10:04] LANGUAGE AND IF YOU CHOOSE TO THAT COULD BE THE LANGUAGE FOR COMMERCIAL SUBDIVISION SO THAT FOR SURE UPON REQUEST TO ME AND THEN IF WE GO BACK ON THE MEASURES I'M MY LAST RESORT THERE'S NO IT'S ANYTHING OVER FIVE RIGHT IT'S A MAJOR AND SO BE A LARGE AREA BUY A LOT OF LAND FOR COMMERCIAL YEAH I MEAN I JUST WANTED TO TAKE YOU THROUGH IF WE PUT A COMMERCIAL IN HERE OR RECOMMEND THAT THE TOWN COUNCIL HOW MANY YOU KNOW IT COULD BE A LARGE SUBDIVISION FOR EXAMPLE THAT'S A LARGE ACREAGE BELOW FLOODS THAT COULD BE CONSTRUCTED I JUST WONDER IF THERE'S ANY THAT FEAR FOR AN INJURED INCOME COUNSELOR. I DON'T WANT TO DO THAT. WELL, THE PROCESS IS IDENTIFIED BEFORE YOU FOR THE DEVIATION FROM A MAJOR RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION AND THAT PROCESS IS THERE I GUESS FOR MR. WILLIAMS I WOULD LIKE CLARIFICATION ON WHAT HE'S REQUESTING THAT WE CONSIDER ADDING AS IT RELATES TO COMMERCIAL WOULD BE SORT OF THE PROSPECTIVE MAJOR AND MINOR ALL OF COMMERCIAL SUBDIVISIONS ARE MAJOR SUBDIVISIONS EVEN A SUBDIVISION TO LAUNCH OKAY SO AND WE READ THE HEADING THERE APPROVED MAJOR SUBDIVISION OKAY OR MAJOR SUBDIVISION THAT SIX OR MORE RESIDENTIAL FOR ANY COMMERCIAL . THEN WHEN YOU READ THE FIRST PARAGRAPH IT RESTRICTED LIMITS DOWN SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SO AND LIKE SAID IF IF THE INTENT IS TO PROTECT THE INTERESTS OF OWNERS WHO ARE BOUGHT OFF OF A PARTICULAR PLAT THEN THAT THAT'S GOING TO BE CHANGED THEN THE PRINCIPLE IS EXACTLY THE SAME FOR RESIDENTIAL AS IT IS FOR THERE'S A COMMERCIAL PROPERTY OWNER WHO BOUGHT OFF OF THE PLOT. THESE ARE LESS PROTECTION THAN A PROPERTY OWNER WHO'S BOUGHT OFF A GROUP HOME AND SO I THINK MAYBE JUST STRAIGHT YOU KNOW, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL WHEREVER IT SHOWS UP IN THERE. ANY OTHER COMMENTS? YEAH, STAFF JUST NOT TO DRAFT. I THINK IT CAME OUT OF THE CONTEXT OF RESIDENTIAL OF THE ISSUE BEING ATTENDANT TO ONE OR MORE PARTICULAR RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION SO THAT NATURALLY I THINK THE STAFF IS FOCUSED ON THAT. YOU KNOW WHEN I PUT ON MY REPRESENTING DEVELOPER HAD WHAT I'M LOOKING FOR WAYS TO TO GET AROUND THIS IDEA FOR A COMMERCIAL SUBDIVISION THE LANGUAGE RIGHT NOW DOESN'T APPLY TO WE HAVE A MOTION FROM OF THE CONVENTIONS WITH REGARD TO THIS POTENTIAL AMENDMENT BEFORE YOU CLICK CONCLUDE SO LAST YEAR CONVERSATIONS WOULD BE LIVE MUSIC LIVE EVENT RIGHT THERE THEY'RE HERE APPROVED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL INTEREST SUBDIVISION AND OR COMMERCIAL SUBDIVISION WE CURRENTLY DON'T COMMERCIAL OR FOR RESIDENTIAL IT'S EITHER A MAJOR SUBDIVISION OR A MINOR IN OUR APPLICATION PROCESS OF SIX STRAIGHT DISTRICTS YOU'RE YOUR SUBDIVISION THAT DOESN'T I MEAN THAT STILL KEEPS THE I'M JUST READING IT TO MAKE SURE THAT THE REGULATORY INTENT IS MAINTAINED AND THEN AND FOR NO MATTER IF IT'S A RESIDENTIAL OR COMMERCIAL THE PROCESS FOR MAJOR SUBDIVISIONS IS I THINK IT'S GOING TO BE FINE I THINK THE INTENT IS STILL THERE WE'LL HAVE TO REVIEW THAT. BUT IT WOULD BE THE REMOVAL OF THOSE OF THESE WORDS REMOVAL RIGHT HERE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL RIGHT THERE MAYBE AND THEN WORLD WE READ IT BUT I WANT TO MAKE THE MOST OF IT SO INSTEAD OF CHANGING IT ON THE FLOOR COULD WE GET STAFF AN OPPORTUNITY TO UPDATE THIS AND THEN CONSIDER TO REST YOU NEXT [00:15:04] WEEK NEXT WEDNESDAY? EXCELLENT IS THERE ANY SENSE OF URGENCY FROM THE TOWN COUNCIL HERE IS THAT'S WHAT WE'RE MEETING TODAY? THAT'S CORRECT. THERE IS THAT'S WHY WE HAD A SPECIAL MEETING FOR THAT BECAUSE THERE IS SOMETIMES A VERBAL SIGNATURE BECAUSE WHAT IT IS THEY CAN MOVE UNANIMOUSLY. OH, I KNOW THE TOWN COUNCIL ASKED US TO SCHEDULE A SPECIAL MEETING TO CONSIDER THIS TODAY . ANYONE ELSE STRESSING THE IMPORTANCE OF SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL FROM THIS PARTICULAR PROPOSAL HERE AND THEN WE WILL LEADER THAT'S A NO NO. I'LL SUBMIT A MOTION TO STRIKE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AS SHOWN ON THAT PAGE FROM BOTH THAT'S THAT PARAGRAPH AND THE FOLLOWING PARAGRAPH WHERE THAT WOULD APPEAR. ALL RIGHT THESE ARE SECOND FLOOR THAT WAS PROCEDURAL THAT MOTION FOR TO MOVE ON IT EARLY THE PUBLIC ARE ALL IN FAVOR OF STRIKING CLOSURE SO SINGLE FAMILY EVERY SINGLE RESIDENTIAL HOWEVER CAN I CAN INTERJECT HERE IT LOOKS LIKE TO CONSISTENT THAT RIGHT HERE IT SAYS IF WE'RE STRIKING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL STILL SAYS MAJOR HERE AND IF WE'RE STRIKING SINGLE FAMILY WE NEED THE WORD MAJOR RIGHT HERE. YEAH, FAIR. ALL RIGHT WITH THAT TO THE AMENDMENT OF STRIKING TO CHURCH AND RIGHT IN I HAVE ALL BUT ONE SO WE'RE THE ONES ON THE QUOTE RIGHTS RIGHT SO THAT NOW IS CONSTRUCTED AND NOW I WOULD CONSIDER EVERYTHING A MOTION ON THE ENTIRE RECOMMENDED RECOMMENDATION OF DOWNTOWN TO GO BACK TO THE ORDINANCE THE MOTION TO MOVE THERE SO CERTAIN PANEL SECONDS THAT ALL IN FAVOR OF RECOMMENDING THE TOWN COUNCIL CHANGE MADE PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND HERE WE A 5 TO 1 VOTE ON THAT ALL THANKS WE WILL SEE THANK YOU FOR YOUR [9. Commission Business] THE INTEREST HERE OR THE COMMISSION THE HERE SO WE WILL BE MEETING THIS OBJECT THAT'S WHY THIS IS DISTRICT ALL RIGHT AND SO WE WILL HAVE A REPORT ALSO ON THIS STAFF TO REFOCUS ON IF THE LAST MEETING WE GET THE FOLKS FROM THE RV PARK COMMUNITY, THE PUBLIC SERVICE WORK THERE ALONG AND SO THAT THAT WE COULD THEY WOULD GIVE US A REPORT AS TO IF THEY HAD MET WITH THE PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT TO MAKE SURE THEY'RE AWARE OF THE COMMENTS YOU'RE RECEIVED IN THE PUBLIC HEARING AND WANTED TO SEE WHAT THE REACTION IS FROM PUBLIC [10. Chairman’s Report] SERVICES. SO I'M ASKING YOU TO PROVIDE A SERVICE THAT REPORT DETERMINATION VIDEO WHICH WEBSITE THE MOTHER CHAIRMAN'S REPORT IS THAT I HAVE SUBMITTED MY ORIGINAL VERSION VERY EFFECTIVE FOR MARCH 31ST OR BEFORE AND FOR BOTH PERSONAL AND PROFESSIONAL REASONS. SO I DO NOT HAVE THE TIME ANYMORE. I HAVE TAKEN OUT SOME OF MY CONSULTING BUSINESS TO CAUSE A LOT MORE TROUBLE THROUGH THE INTERNET AND SO IT REALLY WILL CONFLICT WITH TRYING TO MEET AS OFTEN AS WE DO AND SO I'VE ASKED THE MAYOR TO WHEN THE INTERVIEW WHICH REQUEST FOR THIS COMMISSION TO KEEP THAT IN MIND HE IS WELL AWARE OF IT I'VE TALKED TO HIM ABOUT IT BEFORE PREVIOUSLY SO ONE MORE MEETING WITH YOU GUYS NEXT WEEK . I WANT TO THANK YOU ALL FOR BEING HERE FOR INVITATION TO ANYBODY THAT SHOWS UP HERE. BUT ARE THERE ANY STAFF REPORTERS THAT ARE OKAY WITH THAT? WE HAVE CONCLUDED * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.