[7. RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO EXECUTE THE NECESSARY DOCUMENTS TO ACCEPT A GRANT OF PERPETUAL EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC USE AND ACCESS AT THE SANDS BOAT LANDING FROM THE TOWN OF PORT ROYAL]

ANY ONLINE I WOULD CLOSE THE CITIZENS COMMENT PORTION AND WE WILL GO INTO THE FIRST AGENDA ITEM NUMBER SEVEN RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO EXECUTE THE NECESSARY DOCUMENTS TO ACCEPT GRANT PERPETUAL EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC USE AND ACCESS TO SANDS BOAT LANDING FROM THE TOWN OF PORT ROYAL DO I HAVE A MOTION SO MOVED? I'LL SECOND THE MOTION. ALL RIGHT.

MOTION I NEED. I'D JUST LIKE TO MENTION THAT I THINK THIS IS A GREAT TOOL FOR COOPERATION BETWEEN THE COUNTY AND THE TOWN FOR THE PUBLIC. GOOD FOR THE SANDS AND THE BOAT. THANK YOU YOU. ANY OTHER COMMENTS? IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR JERRY AND EVERYTHING ON IT. AWESOME.

DO WE NEED A ROLL CALL FOR THIS . ALL RIGHT, CONSIDER THAT

[8. RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE FOR A TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE BEAUFORT COUNTY CODE OF ORDINANCES, CHAPTER 82: IMPACT FEES, ARTICLE I, IN GENERAL; ARTICLE II, DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE PROCEDURES; ARTICLE III, PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES; ARTICLE IV, ROAD FACILITIES – SOUTHERN BEAUFORT COUNTY SERVICE AREA; ARTICLE V, LIBRARY FACILITIES; ARTICLE VI, FIRE FACILITIES; ARTICLE VII, ROAD FACILITIES – NORTHERN BEAUFORT COUNTY (FISCAL IMPACT: PLEASE SEE AIS)]

APPROVED. MOVING ON TO NUMBER EIGHT, THIS ONE WAS ADDED ON WEDNESDAY RECOMMENDING APPROVAL ORDINANCE FOR A TAX AMENDMENT AMENDMENT TO THE COUNTY CODE OF ORDINANCES. CHAPTER 82 IMPACT FEES. I'M GOING TO.

I THINK CHUCK IS GOING TO OPEN IT UP AS WELL WITH TOM. GOOD AFTERNOON.

GOOD AFTERNOON. SO AT CHUCK'S REQUEST KICK IT OFF AND THEN TURN IT OVER TO CHUCK. WE NEED TO HAVE A MOTION OPEN UP THE DISCUSSION FIRST TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL. SO THEN IF SOMEBODY WANTS TO MAKE A MOTION HOPEFULLY WELL WE'LL MOVE IT FORWARD. SO LET ME GIVE A BRIEF OVERVIEW ABOUT WHAT THIS ISSUE IS AND ESPECIALLY FOR THE FOLKS WHO KNEW YOU MAY OR MAY NOT KNOW ABOUT IMPACT FEES, LET ME TELL YOU A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THEM. AND THEN LIKE I SAID, I'LL PITCH IT TO CHUCK WHO EATS THE DRINKS THIS HOLIDAY EVERY DAY. SO IN THE STATE LEGISLATURE YEARS AND YEARS AGO I WANT TO SAY PROBABLY IN THE NINETIES DECIDED THAT THERE HAD TO BE A WAY TO FUND GROWTH TO HELP PAY FOR THE INFRASTRUCTURE THAT IS NEEDED AND A LOT OF SERVICES THAT MUNICIPALITIES COUNTIES OFFER LIKE PARKS AND REC LIBRARIES, FIRE, EMS SAFETY THOSE KINDS OF THINGS.

AND SO THEY ADOPTED IMPACT FEEDBACK ACT WHICH ALLOWS GOVERNMENTAL TO LOCAL ENTITIES TO ADOPT FEES ON SPECIFIC AREAS TO RAISE REVENUE TO PAY FOR THE INFRASTRUCTURE, THE INCREASED INFRASTRUCTURE THAT IS NEEDED TO PROVIDE SERVICES TO THE LARGER COMMUNITIES.

OKAY. BEAUFORT COUNTY HAD SOME IMPACT FEES IN PLACE WHEN THE LEGISLATURE ADOPTED THE IMPACT FEE BUT IN 1999 AND THEN AGAIN 2006 WE AMENDED OUR IMPACT THE ORDINANCE ORDINANCE SAYS TO INCORPORATE THE IMPACT FEES FOR A NUMBER OF DIFFERENT SERVICES.

AND SO WE ARE CURRENTLY UNDER A 2006 IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE WITH REGARD TO PARKS AND RECREATION ROADS, LIBRARIES AND FIRE. OKAY. THOSE ARE THE FOUR THAT WE CURRENTLY HAVE STARTING INTO THE LEGISLATURE ALSO REQUIRES US TO UPDATE THESE IMPACT FEES STARTING IN 2017. WE COMMISSIONED MR. BICE TO CONDUCT A STUDY TO HELP US UPDATE THESE FEES 2017. THEY BROUGHT FORWARD THEIR STUDY IN 2020 AND WE HAVE BEEN ENDEAVORING SINCE 2020 TO GET THESE IMPACT FEES IN OUR ORDINANCE AMENDED AND ADOPTED.

ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE WANT TO DO THAT WE TRY TO DO IS ENTER INTO INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENTS WITH MUNICIPAL CITIES SO THAT WE CAN SO THAT THEY WILL ENFORCE THESE FEES

[00:10:10]

FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT WHICH CAN BE USED TO PROVIDE SERVICES BY THE COUNTY.

ALL RIGHT. SO FOR INSTANCE, POOLE'S BLUFFTON THE HUGE PARKS AND REC STUFF YOU SEE DOWN IN BLUFFTON THAT KIND OF STUFF IS PAID FOR WITH IN FACT THESE LIBRARIES, THE FIRE STATIONS THESE THINGS ARE PAID FOR WITH IMPACT FEES. SO WE DID NOT HAVE INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENTS WITH ALL OF THE MUNICIPALITIES FOR THE UPDATED IMPACT FEES UNTIL RECENTLY. ALL RIGHT. WHILE WE TRIED TO GET THOSE IDEAS IN PLACE, WE BROUGHT FORWARD TEXT AMENDMENTS TO THE IMPACT FEES AND COUNCIL CONSIDERED THOSE LAST YEAR. WE GOT THROUGH TWO READINGS AND THE THIRD READING WAS HELD ON MARCH 28TH DOWN IN SAINT HELENA AND COUNCIL DECIDED TO HOLD OFF ON MOVING FORWARD WITH A THIRD READING FOR THE IMPACT FEES THAT WERE UNDER CONSIDERATION THAT TIME AND AT THAT TIME WE WERE LOOKING AT PARKS AND REC, WE WERE LOOKING AT FIRE. WE WERE LOOKING AT LIBRARY BUT WE WERE NOT BRINGING FORWARD ROADS AT THAT TIME BECAUSE THERE WASN'T AN AGREEMENT ABOUT EXACTLY WHAT ALL WHAT ALL THE PROJECTS SHOULD BE. SO COUNCIL HALTED THIRD READING OF THE IMPACT FEES THAT WE HAD BROUGHT FORWARD THAT TIME. WE DECIDED WE WOULD GO BACK TO THE MUNICIPALITIES WE WOULD NEGOTIATE WITH THEM TO ENGAGE WE WOULD AGREE ON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT LIST AND ONCE WE HAD ALL THAT DONE WE WOULD BRING FORWARD THE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES NEVER EVEN GOT FIRST AND SECOND READING.

WE BRING IT FORWARD CATCH IT UP TO THE THIRD READING AND THEN KIND OF MOVE IT ALL.

WELL, WE IN THE INTERVENING YEAR ALMOST WE HAVE COME UP WITH AGREEMENTS WITH REGARD TO VIRTUALLY ALL OF THE MUNICIPALITIES. ALL RIGHT.

SO THEN WE WERE TASKED WITH OKAY, HOW DO WE BRING THIS FORWARD? WE THOUGHT ABOUT IT AND WE THOUGHT THAT IT REALLY DIDN'T MAKE A LOT OF SENSE TO TRY TO JUST BRING FORWARD THE TRANSPORTATION AND THE MARRIOTT TO THE OTHER IMPACT.

THE THIRD READING AND INSTEAD WE WOULD DROP BACK AND BRING ALL OF THEM FORWARD.

SO WHAT WE HAVE DONE IS WE HAVE WHAT YOU HAVE IN YOUR PACKET IS THE IMPACT SEE THE PROPOSED IMPACT THE AMENDMENTS THAT WERE UP FOR THIRD READING ON MARCH 28TH FOR ALL OF THOSE IMPACT OTHER THAN TRANSPORTATION AND YOU HAVE TRANSPORTATION THE AMENDED AND THE TEXT AMENDMENTS FOR THE TRANSPORTATION. ALL RIGHT. SO WHAT WE HAVE GOING FORWARD PLAN TO BRING FORWARD IS BASICALLY THE PARKS AND REC ROADS LIBRARY AND FIRE IMPACTS.

RIGHT. THAT'S WHAT WE'RE BRINGING FORWARD.

YOU MAY HAVE SEEN REFERENCE TO THE SCHOOL IMPACT IN THE STUDY THAT IS NOT GOING FORWARD.

IT WAS INCLUDED IN YOUR PACKET I THINK SIMPLY BECAUSE WE COMMISSIONED TISCHLER BASED TO DO IT. THEY DID IT AND AND IT'S IN YOUR PACKAGES THAT PURPOSE ALONE. EMS I'M NOT SURE WHERE YOU ARE WITH THE EMS THAT WAS THAT WAS PUT ON HOLD TOO BUT WE'RE NOT JUST SO EVERYBODY KNOWS WE ARE NOT BRINGING FORWARD A RENEWED SCHOOL IMPACT. SO THAT IS NOT HAPPENING. OKAY.

THIS IS TRANSPORTATION. THIS IS FIRE. THIS IS ROADS NORTH AND SOUTH OF THE BROAD AND LIBRARIES. ALL RIGHT. HOW WILL WE EVER BRING BACK A SCHOOL IN VACCINE DISCUSSION? JUST FIGURE IT OUT. I DON'T KNOW THE PROBLEM.

YOU KNOW, THAT'LL BE UP TO THE ADMINISTRATION AND COUNCIL. THE PROBLEM THE REASON WE HAD ELIMINATE IT WAS BECAUSE WE COULD NEVER GET THE THE SCHOOLS, THE MUNICIPAL BUILDINGS TO AGREE TO AND IT WAS JUST SIMPLY COUNCIL DEEMED IT UNFAIR TO CHARGE AN IMPACT FEE FOR A GUY WHO BUILT A HOUSE ON ONE SIDE OF THE STREET THAT WAS IN THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF THE COUNTY AND NOT CHARGE AN IMPACT FEE ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE STREET FOR SOMEBODY WHO WAS IN A MUNICIPALITY. AND SO THEY THOUGHT THAT WAS. SO IT'S NOT GOING TO BE COMING LATER. IS THERE PLANS TO BRING IT FORWARD? OKAY. AND SO WE HAVE WE HAVE WE HAVE SEEN SOME IDEAS WITH MUNICIPALITIES THAT HAVE THEN ADOPTED SOME ARE IN THE PROCESS OF BEING ADOPTED AND WITH BUILT WE WE'RE IN THE PROCESS OF WORKING THAT OUT BUT THEY'VE AGREED TO THEM SO WE JUST NEED TO HAMMER OUT THE TERMS. ALL RIGHT. ALL RIGHT.

VERY GOOD. YEAH. THANKS A LOT.

GOOD AFTERNOON TO. TOM ALWAYS DOES A WONDERFUL JOB SUMMARIZING WHERE WE HAVE BEEN GO. IS THIS BETTER JOB THAN COULD DO ON THAT? SO I DO WANT TO ADDRESS THE SCHOOL IMPACT FEES AND THE EMC IMPACT USING A LITTLE MORE DETAIL. WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO DO WITH BOTH OF THOSE IS ELIMINATE THE MISTAKE IS NOT OF THE STATE BUT AN ISSUE OVER TIME THAT WE HAVE ALREADY THE EFFECTS OF AND THAT IS WHERE THE COUNTY A FEE BUT MUNICIPALITIES DON'T. ALL OF THESE IMPACT FEES IF YOU

[00:15:07]

THINK THE IMPACT FEES WHEN YOU DO A STUDY IT IS A SNAPSHOT IN TIME WITH A FORWARD LOOK AT NEEDS POPULATION GROWTH POPULATION CENTERS SO ANY TIME YOU LOOK AT A STUDY IT IS A IT IS A CUSTOM ONE TIME IN THAT TIME FRAME THAT TIME PERIOD SHOT AT WHAT WE'RE GOING TO NEED AS FAR AS RESOURCES TO PAY FOR FACILITIES OVER A TEN YEAR PERIOD AND THEN WE ARE TO UPDATE THESE EVERY FIVE YEARS. SO ONCE WE GET THIS DONE WE GET ALL OF OUR AGREES IN PLACE EVERY FIVE YEARS WE WILL BE UPDATING THIS PLAN WHAT WE'VE HAD WITH IN PARTICULAR AND PARKS AND REC IS SOME MUNICIPALITIES HAVE NOT PARTICIPATE IN THAT SINCE 2006 WELL SINCE THE FEE IS CALCULATED BASED ON THE TEN YEAR NEED WITH PARTICIPATING IT PUTS YOU IN A POSITION WHERE YOU RECEIVE FUNDING WHICH YOU CAN ONLY FUND PARTIAL A PORTION OF LIST FOR WHICH YOU GENERATED THE FEE FOR IN THE FIRST PLACE IF THAT MAKES SENSE.

SO EMS THERE WAS NO APPETITE FOR MUNICIPALITIES TO SIGN ON IGAS MUCH LIKE WITH THE SCHOOL DISTRICT AND THE REASONS WHY VARY BY JURISDICTION SO THAT'S WHY THEY'RE NOT IN IN AN EFFORT TO SIMPLIFY A COMPLICATED ORDINANCE. I HAVE I'M USING THE BACKUP AND I WILL REFER TO THE PAGES OF THE PDF BACKUP INSTEAD OF DOING A SEPARATE PRESENTATION I'M JUST GOING TO GO THROUGH THE BACK END SO ANYBODY WATCHING ON TELEVISION CAN DOWNLOAD IT WITH THE PDF THEY COULD GO RIGHT TO PAGE NUMBER THAT I'M GOING TO REFERENCE AND THEN THEY CAN FOLLOW ALONG. THEY EITHER WATCH IT LIVE OR WHEN THEY WATCH IT AS A RECORDING. SO LET'S START ON PAGE 16 OF THE BACKUP THAT'S THE THE AIR IN PARTICULAR IN THE FISCAL IMPACT.

I WANT TO START WITH THE TEN YEAR IMPACT THE REVENUE PROJECTIONS BY IMPACT THE BUCKET EACH ACCOUNT I WANT TO REFER TO SOME BUCKET ROAD IMPACT FACILITIES NORTH OVER TEN YEARS IT'S 29.8 MILLION ROAD IMPACT THE ROAD FACILITY SOUTH IS 37.7 MILLION PARKS AND REC NORTH IS 4.2 MILLION PARKS AND REC SOUTH IS 3.6 MILLION. LIBRARIES 3.5 MILLION.

LIBRARY SOUTH 3.3 MILLION. FIRE NORTH 6.3 MILLION AND FIRE SOUTH TEN ALMOST 10.2 MILLION.

SO THERE ARE IF YOU GET INTO THE STUDY THERE ARE A LOT OF DIFFERENT WAYS THAT THE THE CONSULTANT CAME UP WITH THESE NUMBERS WE HAVE A VIP LIST WHEN YOU GET INTO LIBRARIES AND PARKS AND REC IT HAS TO DO WITH POPULATION WHAT WE HAVE WHAT THE DEMAND WILL BE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF DIFFERENT OF FACILITIES IF YOU GET INTO THE STUDY IT'S 250 TO 260 PAGES AND IT EXPLAINS WHERE STARTED AND HOW THEY CAME UP WITH THESE NUMBERS.

THE TABLES THAT WE'RE GOING TO GO THROUGH BY A BUCKET OR HOW WE'RE GOING TO GO ABOUT COLLECTING THESE OVER THE NEXT TEN YEARS. ANY QUESTIONS ON THAT BEFORE I TO THE TABLES. ALL RIGHT SO I'M GOING TO GO TO PAGE 33 33 IN THE BACK UP.

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

SO NORTH OF THE BROAD WE'LL DO 1250 SQUARE FOOT HOUSE NORTH OF THE BROAD IS GOING TO BE A $590 FEE, A NEW HOUSE, NEW DEVELOPMENT PAY THIS FEE ONE TIME 2500 SQUARE FOOT HOUSE

[00:20:05]

1006 AGAIN THAT'S NEW DEVELOPMENT ONLY ONE TIME THEY PAY IT ONCE THEY PAY THE RESIDENTIAL FEE THEY'RE DONE SOUTH OF THE BROAD. WELL 250 SQUARE FOOT HOUSE IS $353.20 500 SQUARE FOOT HOUSE IS $588 THE AGAIN THIS IS ABOUT IF YOU LOOK AT THE NORTH AND SOUTH WE WELL WHY IS THE NORTH NOW MORE THAN THE SOUTH WELL IT HAS TO DO WITH THE ANTICIPATED DEMAND THE NEED AND THEN THE NUMBER OF PROJECTED NEW BUILDS THE POPULATION GROWTH.

SO IF YOU HAVE AN AREA THAT'S GROWING VERY RAPIDLY YOU'RE GOING TO SPREAD THAT DEMAND OUT OVER MORE HOMES WHICH MEANS THE HOUSE OR THE FEE PER HOUSE GOES DOWN AND THAT'S ALL AGAIN EXPLAINED IN THE STUDY AND THAT'S THAT'S WHY THERE'S THAT DIFFERENCE.

SO ON PAGE 34 TO BE SURE SO IF YOU'RE LOOKING AT NORTH AND SOUTH AND THE RESIDENTIAL ASPECTS OF IT AND THE DEMAND THE KEY ROLE IN DETERMINING THE FEE AND I'M I'M NOT I'M NOT FOLLOWING YOU BECAUSE THE DEMAND IS FOR THE OF PEOPLE IN THE HOUSE WASN'T THE GROWTH IS SELF BUILDING SO IF YOU BUILD A 25,000 SQUARE FOOT HOME NORTH OF I DON'T REMEMBER THE YOU SAID IT WAS 1000 SOMETHING AND THEN SOUTH OF BROAD THE SAME 25,000 SQUARE FOOT AND ONLY 45 AND 7588 SOUTH 1006 NORTH SO THE ISSUE THAT WE'VE HAD NORTH OF THE BROAD IS WE HAVE A NUMBER OF PLANS IT'S LIKE BURT WELLS SOME OF THESE OTHER MASTER PLANNED AREAS THEY'RE NOT BUILT OUT AND THE REASON THAT THEY'RE NOT BUILT OUT OF LIKE WHAT BUCKWALTER HAS BEEN BUILT OUT IS BECAUSE THERE'S BEEN NO IMPACT THE COLLECTION THE R 100 DISTRICT IMPACTS IS $81 PER NEW HOUSE SO HAVE A LOT OF NEED AND DESIRE TO BUILD PARKS AND REC FACILITIES NORTH OF THE BROAD BUT THERE'S NO REVENUE SOURCE FOR IT OUTSIDE OF EITHER GETTING A BOND OR YOU KNOW, SOME OTHER ALTERNATE COLLECTION WHERE MOST OF THE PROJECTS ON THE 2006 LIST SOUTH OF THE BROAD HAVE BEEN BUILT AN EXAMPLE OF THAT RIGHT NOW I WAS GOING TO LOOK AT IMPACT THE ACCOUNTS TODAY THE BLUFFTON PARKS AND REC IMPACT V ACCOUNT HAS NINE AND A HALF MILLION WHICH SOUNDS LIKE AN EXORBITANT AMOUNT OF MONEY.

WELL WHEN WE ABOUT FIVE OR SIX YEARS AGO WHEN WE DID ESTIMATES WHAT IT WOULD COST TO BUILD OUT BUCKWALTER A LITTLE OVER $9 MILLION WAS THE PRICE TAG BUT WE JUST HAD THAT REPORTED LAST FALL IN NOVEMBER AND THE PRICE TAG CAME IN AT JUST UNDER $22 MILLION SO WE'RE GOING TO FINISH A NUMBER OF BALL FIELDS. WE'RE GOING TO FINISH THINGS OUT AT BUCKWALTER AND IT'S GOING TO COST US ALL OF THAT AND A HALF MILLION DOLLARS WHERE WE'VE BEEN COLLECTING $81 PER HOUSE IN YOUR 100 AREA NOT MUCH MORE THAN THAT ON LADY'S ISLAND WE'VE GOT YOU KNOW, $150,000 OR SO I'D HAVE TO LOOK IT UP AGAIN BUT THERE'S JUST NOT ENOUGH MONEY TO KEEP PACE WITH WHAT THE DEMAND. SO THE IDEA IS WE HAVE PUT IF YOU'LL LOOK ON PAGE 34 IT MAY HELP EXPLAIN WHERE WE'RE GOING WITH SOME OF THIS STUFF. THIS IS OUR PROJECT LIST WE HAVE SOUTHERN WE HAVE BUCKWALTER PARK EXPANSION IN ZERO EXPANSION THE FIRST KEY PARKS OUTDOOR AQUATIC SPLASH PADS BLUFFTON CENTER EXPANSION THAT'S THE PHASE THREE THEN PASSIVE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION AND COMMUNITY CENTER EXPANSION RECREATION FIELD AND THEN IF YOU LOOK AT NORTH OF THE BROAD IT'S A MUCH MORE EXHAUSTIVE LIST.

NOW I DO WANT TO SAY THAT NOT ALL OF THESE WILL BE FUNDED IN IMPACT FEES.

THERE WAS A PRIORITIZED LIST. IT'S ALL IN THE STUDY OF HOW THEY CAME OUT BASED ON THE GROWTH BECAUSE YOU CAN ONLY PAY FOR DEMAND WITH IMPACT FEES. YOU CAN'T RENOVATE THINGS, YOU CAN'T YOU KNOW YOU CAN'T BUILD THINGS THAT ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THE STUDY AND FILL THAT NEED WITH THAT MONEY IT HAS TO BE THIS IS IDENTIFIED MONEY AND IT HAS TO BE IN A VERY SPECIFIC WAY SO IF YOU LOOK AT WHAT'S ON THAT LIST, THERE ARE A LOT OF THINGS THAT WE NEED TO DO NORTH OF THE BROAD VIEWER ITEMS FEWER THINGS THAT ARE LEFT OUTSTANDING SOUTH OF THE ROAD STILL A NUMBER OF ITEMS BUT THAT'S THAT'S WHY THE TWO ARE THERE.

I WOULD EXPLAIN THIS WE'RE PLAYING CATCH UP MORE A THE BROAD LET ME ASK THIS I

[00:25:07]

UNDERSTAND THE CATCH OF YOU SAYING TO THE COUNCIL THAT THOSE WHO ARE COMING HERE TO BE IN BEEF RIGHT NOW WHO WILL BE PAYING THE IMPACT FEE ISSUE CATCHES UP THOSE ARE BECAUSE IMPACT IF YOU'RE NOT SEEN OKAY THAT'S YOU KNOW THAT'S ALL RIGHT THEN THEN YOU TALK ABOUT THE CAPITAL PROJECTS I WANT TO USE AS A COMPARISON FOR THE BROAD NEEDING AN EXCURSION TO CARRY ALL THIS FAMILY AND THE EXCURSION KNOW THE BIG EXPEDITION CARE IS THE FAMILY NORTH OF THE BROAD DON'T HAVE AS MANY CHILDREN OR PEOPLE SHOULD BE LOOKING TO BUY THE EXPEDITION AS WELL OR SHOULD WE JUST TRY TO GET A LITTLE MORE EXPLORE.

THAT'S MY QUESTION. WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE CAPITAL PROJECT AND THE CAPITAL NEEDS ARE YOU HEARING THE NEEDS WITH WHAT WE ACTUALLY NEED BECAUSE BUILDING SOMETHING FACILITIES JUST TO SAY WE'VE GOT A FACILITY WHERE WE'RE NOT BASICALLY UTILIZING THOSE FACILITIES AND STUFF WELL I'LL TRY TO PUT THIS BECAUSE OF THE DEMAND VOLUME 100% AND I'LL TRY TO PUT IT IN PERSPECTIVE SO PARKS AND REC NOR THE TEN BASED ON THIS CITY AND BASED ON THE NUMBER OF HOMES BEING BUILT OVER THAT TEN YEAR PERIOD THE TOTAL REVENUE PROJECTION IS $4.2 MILLION. OUR NORTH IS PROBABLY CLOSER TO 20 $25 MILLION TOTAL BUILD OUT OF ALL THIS MY FIRST QUESTION SHOULD WRITE SHOULD PEOPLE COME UP TO 24 SO PEOPLE WHO ALREADY WE JUST BRING KIDS OF THE CITIZENS OF THE COUNTY SHOULD BE A PART OF THAT KINSHIP AS WELL. SO THE REASON THIS IS ONLY FOR THE PROPORTIONAL SHARE THE NEW PEOPLE COMING HERE THAT'S WHY I'M MAKING THE POINT THAT NORTH HAVE $4.2 MILLION COLLECTED BUT THE WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO MAKE UP THAT DIFFERENCE IF WE BUILD OUT EVERYTHING TEN YEARS.

SO THIS IS THE PROPORTIONAL SHARE OF THOSE PEOPLE WHO ARE COMING IN IS NOT THEY'RE NOT PAYING FOR YOU KNOW THEY'RE NOT PAYING FOR SOMEBODY ELSE'S RESPONSIBILITY IS JUST THE IMPACT OF THOSE PEOPLE COMING IN THAT IN THAT TEN YEAR PERIOD.

OKAY SO THAT'S WHY IT'S AT 4.2 AND NOT 20, RIGHT? SO IF WE BUILT OUT EVERYTHING ON THAT LIST IT WOULD BE A WHOLE LOT MORE THAN 4.2. SO IT'S JUST THAT SHARE THE FACT THAT A LOT OF PEOPLE HAVE MOVED INTO CERTAIN MUNICIPALITIES DOES NOT PAY INTO PARKS AND REC. WELL THEN THAT IS GOING TO HAVE TO BE SHARED THROUGHOUT THE COUNTY AND THAT'S THE OF ADOPTING IMPACT IS WHEN YOU DON'T HAVE AGGREGATES IT'S SO THAT'S WHERE IT CREATES A DISCREPANCY WHEN I SAY CATCH UP I'M TALKING ABOUT MASTER PLANNED PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN ON THE BOOKS FOR SOME 15 YEARS THAT HAVE BEEN OVER TIME.

BUT THE FOLKS WHO ARE PAYING UNDER THIS ARE NOT PAYING FOR THINGS THAT IS OUTSIDE OF THE IMPACT THAT THEY'RE HAVING THAT MAKE ANY SENSE AT ALL? SURE.

OKAY. IN THE TWO MUNICIPALITIES DO NOT PAY RECREATION RIGHT.

BUT THEY HAVE AGREED TO DO IT IN THE FUTURE. YES, WE HAVE IDEAS EITHER IN THE WORKS FIRST READING OR ALREADY FOR ALL OF THESE. THAT'S WHY WE'RE BRINGING IT FORWARD NOW. RIGHT. SO THE SOUTH PARKS REC IS THE 3.6 BECAUSE IF YOU LOOK AT THAT LIST REALLY WHAT WE HAVE IS THE WATER EXPANSION AND THEN AQUATICS NEEDS AND THEN IF WE WANT TO EXPAND SOME OF THE OTHERS IPI PROJECT SOUTH OF THE BROAD THAT'S WHERE WE GET THAT NUMBER FROM BECAUSE WE'VE ALREADY INVESTED YOU KNOW, MILLIONS DOLLARS THERE THAT HAVE BEEN COLLECTED BY IMPACT FEES BECAUSE EVERYBODY HAS BEEN COLLECTING THEMSELF. SO THEY WERE IN ON AN IDEA HAD AGREEMENT SO THAT'S RIGHT YEAH THEY COLLECTED THEMSELF AND THAT'S HOW YOU WIND UP WITH A WATER THAT IN THE FACT THAT IT WAS GROWING AND BOUNDS RIGHT BUT THE THE BIGGEST THING ABOUT IMPACT FEES IS EVERYBODY HAS TWO PARTICIPATE TO MAKE THEM WORK RIGHT IF YOU DON'T PARTIALLY FUNDING THINGS IN JUST THE COST OF DOING BUSINESS OUTSTRIPS YOUR ABILITY TO COLLECT IT OKAY.

WELL THAT HELPS. LET'S TALK ABOUT ROADS REAL QUICK.

THE THIS IS ON PAGE 41 OF THE BACKUP MATERIALS. SO THERE ARE TWO THINGS THAT ARE COLLECTED ON COMMERCIAL AND ALL OF THE FEES ARE COLLECTED ON RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES,

[00:30:06]

COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES AND I WANT TO MAKE THIS DELINEATION NOW BECAUSE AND FIRE ARE THE TWO THAT ARE COLLECTED ON COMMERCIAL WE'RE GOING TO TALK ABOUT ROADS THIS IS THE RESIDENTIAL TABLE AND THEN WE'RE GOING TO TALK ABOUT THE COMMERCIAL TABLE ON THE NEXT PAGE. SO ROAD FACILITY DEVELOPMENT THESE OF THE BROAD 150 SQUARE FOOT HOUSE 1896 AND I DO HAVE EXAMPLES THAT I'M GOING TO SHARE WHEN I WHEN I'M FINISHED TO COMPARE WHAT'S BEING PAID NOW WHAT THE MOVIE WOULD LOOK LIKE 4500 SQUARE FOOT HOUSE NORTH OF ROAD IS 3135 OUT SOUTH OF THE BROAD THE 1250 SQUARE FOOT HOUSE IS $1,939.

THE 2500 SQUARE FOOT HOUSE IS $3,231. ALL RIGHT.

IF WE CAN GO TO PAGE 42 OF THE BACK UP, WE'RE NEXT PAGE AT THE TOP THIS IS THE NONRESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT CHART. THERE WE GO. SO WE HAVE FOUR DIFFERENT TYPES OF THAT. WE WILL PUT ANY DEVELOPMENT THAT COMES IN.

WE WILL PUT IT IN THE MOST APPROPRIATE CATEGORY RETAIL NORTH OF THE BROAD IS PER THOUSAND SQUARE FEET OF FLOOR AREA AND IT'S HEATED FOR HOW WE CALCULATE IT BOTH FOR RESIDENTIAL AND NONRESIDENTIAL 4500 $13 FOR RETAIL PER THOUSAND FEET OFFICE SERVICE 2243 INDUSTRIAL THAT WOULD BE INDUSTRIAL WAREHOUSING THINGS OF THAT NATURE FACTORIES THAT'S 9005 AND INSTITUTIONAL WHICH IS 2089 4000 SQUARE FEET SOUTH 4000 SQUARE FEET IS 5024 FOR RETAIL 2497 FOR OFFICE AND SERVICE 1007 IS INDUSTRIAL AND THEN 2326 FOR INSTITUTIONAL SO ROAD IMPACT. THESE ARE A LITTLE DIFFERENT THAN JUST BY POPULATION IT GOES OFF OF THE TRIP GENERATION TABLES AND THE NUMBER OF TRIPS USE YOU GET INTO THE BACK OF MATERIAL. THERE IS A NEWER STUDY THAN THE 2017 FOR ROADS THEY REVISITED THAT WE GOT KNEE DEEP IN THE AGGREGATE DISCUSSIONS THE MUNICIPALITIES HAD REQUESTS FOR SPECIFIC PROJECTS TO BE ADDED TO ZIP LIST. ALL OF THAT WAS PUT ON THE LIST. WE SENT IT BACK TO THE CONSULTANT THEY RECALCULATED IT THAT'S WHY THEY ARE TWO STUDIES IN THE BACK OF THE ROAD ONCE COMPLETED I THINK IN 2022, LAST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER AND IN UPDATED THESE THESE THAT'S WHAT WE WERE WAITING ON BY HAVING QUESTIONS ON ROADS. YES NO I'M LOOKING AT THE PARAGRAPH RIGHT UNDER THAT CHART IT SAID ROAD DEVELOPMENT IMPACT SHALL BE ADJUSTED ANNUALLY TO REFLECT THE EFFECTS OF INFLATION. GOOD LORD DID WE ALREADY DO THAT? SO WHAT YOU DO RIGHT SO YOU HAVE TO HAVE TO KEEP GOING. IT'S NOT THE CPI IT THE EMR WHICH IS THE ENGINEERING NEW RECORD WHICH IS SPECIFIC CONSTRUCTION COST BY CATEGORY SO IN THIS NEW ONE. YES EVERY YEAR WE WILL UPDATE THAT BY THE END I WILL SAY THAT THE CONSUMER PRICE INDEX THAT WE'VE SEEN INFLATIONARY ON IS IS REALLY NOT COMPARABLE TO THIS ONE OF THE HIGHEST MARKERS I THINK AND I'M NOT AN ECONOMIST ONE OF THE HIGHEST MARKERS IS FOOD AND CONSUMABLES WHICH WOULD NOT REALLY APPLY TO THIS.

SO YES WILL UPDATE EVERY YEAR BUT IT'S DONE SPECIFICALLY FOR FOR THAT CONSTRUCTION TYPE.

ANY OTHER QUESTION ON ROADS BEFORE I GO THE NEXT TWO PAGES 4344 AND THAT'S YOUR PROJECT LISTS OF 43 AND 44 THE BACK UP THE GENERAL PROJECT LIST SO THAT YOU CAN SEE THOSE AS THE UPDATED THIS IS WHAT INCLUDED IN THE SECOND STUDY THIS IS WHAT THOSE COLLECTIONS WERE BASED ON AND AGAIN ROAD FACILITIES NEWARK TEN YEAR TOLL IS 29.8 MILLION AND ROAD FACILITY SOUTH IS 37.7. SO AND AGAIN WE'RE NOT WE'RE NOT FINDING 100% OF THESE PROJECTS. THESE ARE PROPORTIONAL IT'S A PROPORTIONAL SHARE OF THOSE WHO ARE IN WHO ARE ADDING TO IMPACT BY BUILDING NEW HOMES AND MOVING HERE IN THE PERIOD OF TIME WHICH THIS ORDINANCE WOULD BE IN EFFECT LIBRARY FEES ON PAGE IS THAT ITEM TRAFFIC

[00:35:11]

SIGNAL 16 TRAFFIC SIGNAL TYPE OF IMPROVEMENT IS TRAFFIC DOES THAT MEAN WE'RE LOOKING DOWN THE ROAD OF HAVING TO PUT 16 NEW TRAFFIC SIGNALS? JARED COMING TO MY RESIDENCE OR HIS I HE'S GOING TO ANSWER THAT QUESTION SO THE TRAFFIC SIGNALS JUST THE CATCH ALL RIGHT THERE WE DON'T WE KNOW THAT WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE GOING TO BE NEEDED OVER THE COURSE OF TEN YEARS. WE DON'T KNOW WHERE.

SO THAT IS JUST A CATCH WHETHER IT'S A UPGRADE TO THE EXISTING SIGNAL OR A COMPLETELY NEW ONE TO BE DETERMINED BUT THAT ALLOWS THE FLEXIBILITY. OKAY.

MY QUESTION IS GOING BE A LITTLE MORE IN DEPTH DESCRIPTION FOR A BUCKWALTER PARKWAY ACCESS MANAGEMENT AND ROADWAY CONNECTIVITY. SO THIS IS AND WE'VE GOT THIS ON MOST OF THE MAJOR CORRIDORS ON SOUTH BROAD IN NORTH BROAD SO SAME THING WE DON'T KNOW EXACTLY WE'RE GOING TO NEED ACCESS ROADS BUT AS DEVELOPMENT OCCURS OR IF WE NEED TO FILL IN WHERE A DEVELOPMENT HAS MET UP WITH OTHER ANYTHING ALONG THAT SO OUR ROADS IN TO QUALIFY FOR IMPACT FEES YOU HAVE TO HAVE SAFETY AND CAPACITY SO THESE ACCESS MANAGEMENT ROADS HELP YOU GET TO A SIGNAL THAT'S ALL RIGHT CHOREOGRAPHED AND WE HAVE A ACCESS MANAGEMENT ON BUCKWALTER AND BLUFFTON PARKWAY AND OTHER THE MAJOR CORRIDOR THAT'S THE PURPOSE OF THAT SO IT'S NOT IT'S A KIND OF CATCH ALL AS WELL SO WE DON'T KNOW EXACTLY WHO ENDS UP LIKE A FOUR AND A HALF MILE ROAD CONNECTING BLUFFTON TO BLUFFTON PARKWAY. NOT THAT ONE YOU KNOW THAT THAT'S NOT THE INTENT. OKAY. JUST MAKING SURE THAT THIS IS NOT THAT WAS INVOLVED. I HAVE A QUESTION, MR. CHAIRMAN FOR YEAH.

HOW LONG DID WE ALSO GET MONEY FROM A ONCE YET SO SO THIS ACTUALLY WE STARTED YEARS AGO SO THE ACTUAL PLANNING OF IT HAS BEEN CHOREOGRAPHED REALLY WELL.

IT WAS PERFECT TIME FOR PLANNING BECAUSE WE CALL THIS ON FEES ON FUTURE SALES DAYS AND THEN ON OUR LONG RANGE TRAIN LONG RANGE PLAN WITH LAS THEY HAD TO DO A FIVE YEAR UPDATE SO WE CALL EVERYTHING SO SEE A LOT OF OVERLAP AND AS JEFF MENTIONED IMPACT FEES IS NOT GOING TO PAY FOR ALL THESE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS BUT IS A ANOTHER TOOL IN THE TOOLBOX SO USUALLY ON A ROAD PROJECT IN BUILDING PROJECT THERE'S MULTIPLE FUNDING SOURCES AND THIS IS ONE OF THE FUNDING SOURCES RESTATE AND I KNOW I'M KIND OF REPEATING MYSELF ON THIS BUT IT'S AN IMPORTANT POINT THIS ONLY FOR THE IMPACT OF THOSE FOLKS WHO ARE PROJECTED TO MOVE HERE. RIGHT. WE'RE NOT ANYTHING EXCEPT FOR THAT IMPACT IN ACCOUNTING FOR THOSE VEHICLE TRIPS OF THOSE PEOPLE IN THIS TIME FRAME WE'RE GOING TO MOVE HERE. WE'RE NOT PUTTING ANY UNDUE BURDEN ON THEM.

THAT'S WHY IT'S I'M GOING TO SAY ONLY ONLY $37 MILLION WHEN YOU ADD UP ALL OF THESE PROJECTS IT'S WAY MORE THAN $37 MILLION. SO THIS IS A FUNDING SOURCE THAT IS PARTIALLY GOING TO THESE BASED ON THE IMPACT OF PEOPLE MOVING HERE.

I KNOW I'M KIND OF BEATING THAT UP BUT IT'S IMPORTANT BECAUSE I DON'T WANT ANYBODY FEEL LIKE THEY'RE GOING TO BE TREATED UNFAIRLY BY THIS BECAUSE THEY'RE NOT AND AND TO ADD ON TRANSPORTATION BUILDERS PROBABLY THE SAME WAY BUT SPECIFIC TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES ARE REALLY HELPFUL FOR IS TO HELP PROJECT STARTED SO WE KNOW THAT WE WANT TO DO THAT PROJECT WE DON'T HAVE SALES TAX LINED UP OR WE DON'T HAVE SOMETHING ELSE LINED UP BUT WE CAN GET STARTED THE ENGINEERING AHEAD OF TIME BECAUSE WE HAVE IT LISTED ON THE LIST AND IN COORDINATING WITH THE MUNICIPALITIES WE HAVE A PRESENCE TO LIST NORTH AND SOUTH AND WE CHOSE AS WERE PARING DOWN LIKE OKAY THE FIRST TIME IT WAS THE THREE WAS RIDICULOUS. EVERYBODY'S LIKE THAT'S NOT POSSIBLE BUT WHAT COULD WE LIVE WITH AND WHAT WAS PALATABLE AND WE CHOSE TO KEEP MORE PROJECTS ON LIST WITH LESS AMOUNT OF IMPACT FEES AS THE TOTAL FUNDING COMPONENT IN ORDER THAT WE CAN HAVE THE MOST FLEXIBILITY ON WHATEVER PRIORITIES COME OVER THE NEXT TEN YEARS.

SO AGAIN TRYING TO STARTED WHILE WE WORK ON THE REST OF THE FUNDING FOR THE PROJECT . YEAH IT'S JUST ABOUT RACKING MY BRAIN TRYING TO REMEMBER BUT I REMEMBER FLORENCE I MEAN IMPACT FEES FOR MORE FOR GETTING THINGS SHOVEL READY THAN WE HAVE THE OTHER FUNDING SOURCE COMING IN I WAS IN THE A LOT OF COUNCIL FOUR OF YOU ARE I UNDERSTOOD NONE OF THAT FOR LIKE SIX MONTHS. THANK YOU.

I'M GLAD YOU CLEARED THAT UP. I WAS ON TO 78. WE HAVE IMPACT FEES.

WE HAVE A LITTLE BIT OF JOB ON FROM A SAFETY PROJECT AND THEN THE MAIN JUMP FROM COUNTY LOCAL IS IS SALES TAX I SAW. YEAH AND THAT GOES ACROSS THE BOARD RIGHT.

WE GET GRANTS FROM PARKS REC, WE GET A EACH TAX WE GET SO IT'S A PIECE OF A MUCH PICTURE FROM OKAY SO LIBRARY FEES AND AGAIN THIS IS THE IMPACT IF YOU LOOK IN THE STUDY IF YOU'RE

[00:40:09]

EVER HAVING TROUBLE GOING TO SLEEP YOU BREAK THAT OUT AND READ IT.

THEY PROJECT IN THE BLUFFTON AREA NEEDING 10,000 ADDITIONAL SQUARE FEET.

THAT'S WHAT THIS IS. THESE FEES ARE PREDICATED ON NORTH I DON'T KNOW EXACTLY WHAT THE STUDY SAID THE SQUARE FOOTAGE NEEDS ARE BUT IT'S ALONG THOSE LINES AND NORTH OF THE ROAD LIBRARY WERE 1250 SQUARE FOOT HOUSE 273 NOW OKAY I'M SORRY 5050 I'LL WAIT FOR IT TO COME UP SO WE GO AND THAT'S IT SO I IF 50 SQUARE FOOT HOUSE NORTH OF THE BROAD $273 FOR 2500 SQUARE FOOT HOUSE $466 THE BROAD SOUTH OF THE BROAD 150 IS ON AN $89 AND 500 IS $316.

SO FIRE FEES ARE SORT OF A DIFFERENT THIS IS ON PAGE 56 AND THIS IS ONE WHERE THE FOOTNOTES ARE REALLY IMPORTANT IF. YOU DON'T MIND GO TO PAGE 57/1.

I THINK IT WOULD BE EASIER TO EXPLAIN EDU'S THERE YOU GO RIGHT THERE.

SO IF YOU NOTICE IN THE TABLE IT'S AS LOW AS A MEDIUM HAZARD. HIGH HAZARD.

THIS IS ONE 82.8 USE. SO WHAT IS IT TO YOU? IT'S AN IT WELL IT'S A ONE DWELLING UNIT THE ONLY WAY I CAN DESCRIBE IT IS IT EQUALS ONE.

IT'S A STARTING POINT AND ON THIS CHART THAT STARTING POINT IS LOW HAZARD FROM 0 TO 1000 SQUARE FEET. SO HAVING SAID THAT, LET'S GO BACK TO PAGE 56, GO THROUGH THE CHART AND THEN I'M GOING TO READ FOOTNOTE AND IT'LL ALL COME TOGETHER AND SO THE BLUFFTON 150 SQUARE FEET $600 FOR THE SOUTH, THE BROAD OFTEN FARTHEST AREA 4500 IS 991 150 NORTH OF THE BROAD IS 742 AND 2500 NORTH OF THE BROAD IS 1260.

IF YOU COULD SCROLL DOWN TO THE ITEM B IS RIGHT THERE BELOW THE TABLE.

I'M GOING TO READ A PORTION OF THIS IS THIS FOR NONRESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT HARMING THE FIRE HAZARD LEVEL OF DEVELOPMENT AND APPLY THAT THE SCHEDULE PER 1000 SQUARE FEET OF DEVELOPMENT UNDER THE TABLE THAT WE JUST LOOKED AT THE FIRST TABLE FIVE FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT IMPACTS FOR NONRESIDENTIAL ASSIGNING A FEE OF $953 FOR EACH EDU OR FRACTION NEEDED THEREOF IN THE BOSTON FIRE SERVICE DISTRICT AND $1,178 FOR EACH IN THE YOU IN THE NORTH IN THE NORTH FIRE DISTRICT. IF WE GO BACK TO PAGE 57 YOU BETWEEN WHERE IT SAYS UP TO 1000 AND 1001 TO 5000 YOU WOULD PUT A PLUS SIGN IN BETWEEN EACH OF THOSE BOXES SO LOW HAZARDOUS NONCOMBUSTIBLE MEDIUM HAZARD IS COMBUSTIBLE AND HIGH HAZARD WAY I LIKE TO LOOK AT IT IS IT'S EXPLOSIVE FIREWORKS FACTORY SO WE REALLY ALMOST NEVER HAVE A HIGH HAZARD AND WE VERY VERY RARELY HAVE LOW HAZARD EVEN COMPLETELY NONCOMBUSTIBLE BUILDING IF YOU USE IT FOR STORAGE SOMETHING GOING TO BE COMBUSTIBLE IN THAT BUILDING.

SO WHEN YOU LOOK UP IN THE FIRE CODE YOU KNOW THE DIFFERENT HAZARDS AND RANGES TYPICALLY IT'S THE MEDIAN SO WE WOULD TAKE THAT MULTIPLIER THE EDU 953 FOR BLUFFTON OR UP TO 1000 AND MEDIUM WE WOULD DO 1.5 PLUS 1.2 FOR HPD YOU BETWEEN 1001 AND 5000 PLUS WHICH 75 YOU FROM 5001 TO 10001 WAS .15 TO USE FOR ANYTHING OVER 10,000 IT'S IT'S KIND OF HARD TO EXPLAIN BUT THOSE ARE SORT OF THE NUTS AND BOLTS ON THAT. ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THE FIRE LEFT THAT IN NORTH OF OVER 30 DEGREES THIS YES YEAH WOULD YOU SAY AGREED TO IT SO THE STUDY BASED ON THEIR DEMAND AND BASED ON THEIR NEED AND BASED ON THAT PROPORTIONAL YES.

[00:45:02]

THE THE ACTUAL NUMBERS THE ONLY THING THAT THEY HAD TO GO BACK AND RESTUDY WERE THE ROADS AND THAT'S WHAT THAT SECOND STUDY IS FOR AND RIGHT. YES.

HARTVILLE TOWNHILL HEAD CITY OF HOOVER AND PORT ROYAL THEY THEY HAVE THEIR OWN FIRE DEPARTMENTS. RIGHT. SO DOWN IN BLUFFTON EVEN THOUGH THE FIRE DEPARTMENT IS NAMED THE BLUFFTON TOWNSHIP FIRE DISTRICT IS A COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT. SO OUR IMPACT FEES THEY WILL THOSE AND IT GOES TO SUPPORT THAT ALL RIGHT SO WHAT I'M GOING TO DO NOW IS IN VERY BROAD TERMS I'M JUST GOING TO GIVE YOU SORT OF A COMPARISON AND I REALLY HATE DO THIS BUT PEOPLE WANT TO KNOW WHETHER IT'S GOING UP OR GOING DOWN. WELL I'M GOING TO COMPARE WHETHER IT'S GOING UP OR GOING DOWN. BUT WHAT IT REPRESENTS IS DIFFERENT BECAUSE EACH ONE OF THESE IMPACT THESE STUDIES IS A SNAPSHOT IN TIME. SO YOU CAN'T GO BACK TO 2006 AND SAY WELL, YOU KNOW, COMPARE THOSE THEY'RE VERY DIFFERENT WHEN EVERYBODY WILL KNOW IS IT GOING UP OR IS IT GOING DOWN SO RESIDENTIAL NORTH CURRENTLY THIS IS AN AVERAGE OF THE ONE, TWO, THREE, FOUR AND 700 DISTRICTS. THE CURRENT THE ALL INCLUSIVE FOR THE ROAD FIRE LIBRARY AND PARKS IS 2125 THAT'S THE MIDPOINT.

OKAY. SO IT IS NOT NO. SO I JUST I JUST CALCULATED THESE OUT FOR REFERENCE I CAN PUT THEM IN AN EMAIL IF YOU WANT ME TO 21 WHAT I'M SORRY 2125 AND TO SHOW YOU HOW FAR DOWN IN THE WEEDS COULD GET WITH THIS THE JUST THE FIRE FEE LADY'S ISLAND AND 633 PORT ROYAL FOR 79 ON THE 633 WILL BE GOES 181 SO YOU CAN SEE WHEN YOU START ADDING THESE UP YOU WOULD HAVE TO DO A HOUSE IN A SPECIFIC DISTRICT, ADD THEM ALL UP AND COMPARE THAT SO I DID AN AVERAGE OF ALL OF THOSE THE NORTH OF THE BROAD THAT WAS FOUR WHAT'S THE USE OF 2125 UNDER THE CURRENT SCHEDULE A NEW NORTH OF THE BROAD 2500 SQUARE FOOT HOUSE IS 5861 A 1200 SQUARE FOOT HOUSE IS 3501 LARGELY BECAUSE THE ROAD NUMBERS GOING UP RESIDENTIAL SOUTH CURRENTLY WE ARE AT 5482 THAT'S IN THE BLUFFTON AREA THE NEW SOUTH THE 2500 SQUARE FOOT HOUSE IS GOING TO BE 5126, 1200 SQUARE FOOT HOUSE IS 3081 AS AN EXAMPLE FOR COMMERCIAL I DID GENERAL RETAIL IT'S 5000 SQUARE FEET FOR NORTH OF THE BROAD ROAD FEE WOULD BE $19,900 THE FIRE WOULD BE 30 $300. THE NEW ROAD WOULD BE 4513 TIMES FIVE WHICH WOULD BE 22, FIVE, 65 THAT'S AN EDU MULTIPLIER TIMES THE SQUARE FOOTAGE THE FIRE WOULD BE 7423 THE SOUTH CURRENT WOULD BE 31,000 544 FIRE WOULD BE 3000 AND BURN AND THE NEW NUMBER FOR THE NEW ONE WOULD BE ROADS 5024 TIMES THE 5000 SQUARE FEET IS 25,020 AND THE FIRE WOULD BE 6006. SO THAT GIVES YOU A THERE'S NO BIG SHOCKER HERE NORTH OF THE BROAD THE ROAD THE NEED IS UP THE FEE GOES UP A BIT ELSE ACROSS THE BOARD IS PRETTY COMPARABLE I HOPE THAT MADE SOME SOME SENSE IN YOUR QUESTION MAYBE YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? I GOT THIS ONE AND IT'S COULD YOU PROVIDE ME CURRENT IMPACT FEES TO WHICH YOU ARE PROPOSING TO MOVE THE NEXT DAY? WELL OF COURSE YOU WANT TO RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL AND THE REASON I SAY THAT IS RESIDENTIAL IS MY MY CONCERN. OKAY. YES, I CAN ABSOLUTELY.

THANK YOU. I HAVE THEM I CAN READ OFF IF YOU WANT TO.

CAN YOU GIVE THAT TO ME AS WELL? YEAH, I HAVE A TABLE I'LL EMAIL TO EVERYBODY. THAT'S A GREAT SET OF IDEAS FOR WHAT IT'S WORTH WHEN YOU GET INTO COMMERCIAL YOU GET INTO THE TYPE OF USE THE DISTRICT WHERE IT IS CREDITS THAT WOULD BE AVAILABLE. IT GETS REALLY COMPLICATED TO COMPARE THEM SO I'M HAPPY TO DO THAT IF YOU GIVE ME THE CASE MY CASE THAT YOU WANT ME TO DO IT ALL AND I DO HAVE ANOTHER QUESTION I THINK WE ALL THE NEW COUNCIL MEMBERS ALL RAN ON FOR A LOUSY WHAT IS THIS GOING TO

[00:50:03]

DO TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING? GREAT QUESTION IN YOUR ALL RIGHT GO TO PAGE 26 OF THE BACK UP THERE YOU GO RIGHT THERE THE TABLE OKAY SO AM I IN FOR THE SAKE OF TIME I CAN SEND OUT THE AMA NUMBERS, RIGHT? IT'S BASED ON THE NUMBER OF WAGE EARNERS IN A HOUSE 15 YEARS OR OLDER. ALL RIGHT. AND THEN THE MORE WAGE YOU HAVE, THE HIGHER THE AM. I GUESS SO THE CATEGORIES WHERE WE PROVIDE DISCOUNTS IF YOU ARE OVER 80% AM I YOU GET NO DISCOUNT. IF YOU ARE 60 TO 80 YOU GET 60% DISCOUNT IF YOU ARE UNDER 60% AM I IN MY HOUSEHOLD THE 100% DISCOUNT NO IMPACT FEES DON'T GO AWAY. YOU HAVE TO PAY THEM WITH AN ALTERNATE SOURCE SO WE HAVE A BUYER FOR COUNTY AFFORDABLE HOUSING FUND AND WE WILL FUND THESE AS LONG AS MONEY IS AVAILABLE IN THAT FUND TO OFFSET EXPENSES FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING.

THAT IS REAL QUICK. THERE'S TWO WAYS THAT THIS WORKS.

ONE IS AN INDIVIDUAL BUILDING HOUSE ON A LOT. WHAT WE DO HAVE WE HAVE AN FOR THAT THEY PROVIDE US THEIR LAST YEAR TAX RETURN PAY STUB IT'S ALL DONE VERY CONFIDENTIALLY AND STAFF GO THROUGH AND CALCULATE THIS AND AS LONG AS MONEY IS AVAILABLE IN THAT HOUSING FUND WE WILL CREDIT THEM IF THEY FALL IN THAT CATEGORY THAT'S ON AN INDIVIDUAL BASIS AND THERE IS NO FOLLOWING OF THAT PROJECT. IT'S PAID IF THEY LIVE IN IT A YEAR, FIVE YEARS, WHATNOT THEY GET IT. NOW LET'S TALK ABOUT DEVELOPER BUILDING MULTIFAMILY THAT'S VERY DIFFERENT. WHAT WE WILL DO IS ENTER INTO AGREEMENT. THEY WILL ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH US AND DEFINE HOW MANY UNITS WHAT THE AMOUNT PERCENTAGE THEY WANT TO GET TO AND THEN WE REQUIRE EITHER OR BOTH A SIGNED AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY INDEED RESTRICTIONS OVER TIME ENSURE THAT RENTS ARE HELD TO PERCENT OF THEIR INCOME BASED ON THAT AND LEVEL WOULD BE 60% OF AM I WHAT IS THE RENT BASED ON THAT THAT THEY COULD AFFORD IT 30 OR 35% AND THAT'S LISTED UNDER ITEM FIVE.

IT EXPLAINS ALL OF THAT BUT IN A NUTSHELL THAT'S ALL THAT SO MY FOLLOW UP QUESTION WITH THAT BUT I ACTUALLY HAVE A SEPARATE TOO CAN YOU EXPLAIN TO ME THE PAYMENT UNDER PROTEST THE MEDIATION PROCESS THAT'S IN ALL OF THIS? YEAH, SURE.

SO THERE ARE CREDITS THAT CAN BE RECEIVED IF THEY TO PUT IN A TRAFFIC LIGHT IF A DEVELOPER WANTS TO PUT SOMETHING INTO THE COUNTY OTHERWISE IT WOULD HAVE BEEN PUTTING IN ANY WAY THEY CAN SAY LOOK WE TO GET THIS PROJECT GOING THEY WE WANT YOU TO RESEARCH IT BUT WE DON'T WANT TO HOLD OUR PROJECT UNTIL YOU KNOW YOU, GUYS COME UP WITH THE NUMBER AND WE REACH AN AGREEMENT ON THIS. WE WILL SEE THE WHOLE AMOUNT OR IF THERE'S A DISCREPANCY, A CREDIT OR SOMETHING OF THAT NATURE. RIGHT.

SOMETHING IS GOING BACK IN THE 1970S WHEN IT WAS TORN DOWN IN THE EIGHTIES.

I CAN'T PROVE THAT IT WAS THERE BUT I'M GOING TO PAY SOMEBODY TO DO THE RESEARCH AND UP WITH PROOF THAT IT WAS THERE. RIGHT. YOU CAN GET YOUR PERMIT.

YOU PAY US TO PROTEST AND THEN ONCE WE IT UP WE WILL FIND THE MONEY.

SO WHAT ONCE IT'S PROVEN WE ALL GET THE REASON I MEAN WE DON'T HOLD ANYBODY'S MONEY.

THAT'S NOT WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO DO. WE JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT COUNTY IS MADE WHOLE. WE DO NOT EXTEND CREDIT BY THAT .

IT DOESN'T. THANK YOU. SO YOU GUYS ARE IN A TOUGH SPOT THIS ABOUT A YEAR AGO WE GAVE YOU GUYS A TALL TASK AND I LOOK WHEN LOOKED THROUGH THIS ON FRIDAY THEN I SAID I GOT SENT OUT I'LL DO A A JOB I REALLY DID AND IT DONE I KNOW IT'S WORK WITH MISSPELLINGS AND GET IN THE LINES OF COMMUNICATION AND COME TO MEDIUM TO GET SIGN BUT I KNOW WHAT IT WAS LIKE WHEN WE ARE GOING BACK AND AHEAD OF TIME WHERE WE TRIED TO MOVE FORWARD WITH MOVING FORWARD. SO I APPRECIATE YOUR GUYS'S WORK ON THAT. THIS DOES HAVE TO GO TO COUNCIL IF WE WANT TO MOVE FORWARD I WILL LOOK FOR A RECOMMENDATION WHAT I I WILL MAKE THE MOTION. WE RECOMMEND YOUR ORDINANCES SECONDED ANY OBJECTION DONE WITHOUT OBJECTION AND WE WILL MOVE ON TO NUMBER NINE.

[9. RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION TO COMMISSION ANIMAL SERVICE OFFICER- DAVID DUFFY]

THANK YOU GUYS. RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION TO COMMISSION ANIMAL OFFICER DAVID DUFFY WE HAVE A MOTION FOR THAT. I'LL MAKE THAT MOTION A SECOND

[00:55:06]

,SECOND AND SECOND DAVID ANY OBJECTION YOU'VE DONE WITH NO OBJECTION AS PASSED NUMBER TEN

[10. RECOMMENDATION TO AWARD IFB #011023E YEAR 6 RESURFACING AND CEI.]

RECOMMENDATION TO AWARD I THREE NUMBERS 0110236 RESURFACING AND SEE I AM I BELIEVE JARED ALREADY ON HIS WAY ALL RIGHT THIS ONE'S PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD PERSONNEL SEE IS CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING INSPECTION SO JUST TO MAKE SURE WHATEVER YOU'RE PAYING FOR WILL GET SO THIS IS YOUR SIX REJUVENATED TO GET SOME OF THESE THINGS WE TALK IN THIS JARGON SOMETIMES IN THE BACK AND TERMS IS DIFFICULT FOR US REJUVENATE IT IS JUST BASICALLY AN APPLICATION THAT WE PUT ON GOOD ESTIMATE TO KEEP IT GOOD FOR AN EXTENDED PERIOD OF TIME SO IT'S PART OF OUR PAVING WE DO WHERE WE CLEARING THE ASPHALT THEN.

WE ALSO HAVE APPLICATIONS WHERE WE PUT THIS REJUVENATE REJUVENATED THIS PART OF OUR FIVE YEAR PLAN. SO WE HAVE A FIVE YEAR PLAN THAT WE WORK THROUGH IN PARTNERSHIP WITH CPC BECAUSE THIS IS PAVING ON OUR COUNTY OWNED ROADS AND THEN WE ALSO HAVE A COMMITMENT FOR CPC THAT . WE HAVE SO MUCH UPON BEING ABLE TO THIS IS FOR A BID THAT WENT OUT FOR YEAR SIX WHICH YEAR SIX AS PART OF OUR PLAN IS MOSTLY REJUVENATION. WE PUT THAT OUT AND WE RECEIVED A BID IN THE AMOUNT OF 3,103,000 $766,000. SO THIS WOULD BE THE APPROVAL AND THAT INCLUDES BOTH THE REJUVENATE AND THE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION. SO THIS BE A A MOTION TO APPROVE THAT AWARD SO WE CAN MOVE FORWARD WITH THE YEAR SIX RESEARCH PROGRAM.

ANY QUESTIONS JUST TO I HAVE A MOTION TO MOVE THIS FORWARD SO A SECOND SECOND ANY OBJECTION

[11. RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT AWARD FOR A&E SERVICES FROM KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. TO PROVIDE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION FOR THE BAILEY MEMORIAL PARK, LOCATED IN THE TOWN OF BLUFFTON.]

AND THIS WOULD BE DONE WITH NO OBJECTION AND MOVING ON TO NUMBER 11 I'D RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT FOR ANY SERVICES FRENCH HORN ASSOCIATES PROVIDE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION FOR THE BAILEY MEMORIAL PARK LOCATED IN THE TOWN IT DO WE HAVE I DON'T THINK YOU'LL HAVE A PRESENTATION ON THAT ONE DO QUESTIONS OF DEVELOPER OKAY WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR I'M SORRY YOUR PHONE CALLS BECAUSE I DO I HAVE A RECOMMENDATION I'LL MAKE THE MOTION MOTION I SECOND SECOND YOU ANY OBJECTION ALL RIGHT WE'LL MOVE THAT ONE ON AS

[12. RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT AWARD FOR A&E SERVICES FROM KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. TO PROVIDE DESIGN FOR THE PINEVIEW PRESERVE, LOCATED ON LADY’S ISLAND]

WELL NO OBJECTION. NUMBER 12 APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT AWARD FOR ANY SERVICESO PROVIDE DESIGN FOR A POINT OF VIEW PRESERVE LOCATED ON LADY'S ISLAND WE HAVE A MOTION MOTION I ACTUALLY HAVE A QUESTION QUESTIONS ABSOLUTELY I ACTUALLY ONE QUESTION CAN YOU EXPLAIN TO ME THE SUMMARY PORTION THAT'S INCLUDED IN THE PACKET INSTRUCTING GOOD AFTERNOON COUNCILMAN JAMES ERIC LAWSON CAPITAL PROJECTS A PLEASURE TO BE WITH YOU TODAY.

I WILL TRY TO EXPLAIN THIS IF YOU GET TO QUESTIONS THE TOO COMPLICATED TURNING IT OVER TO SCOTT YOUR HONOR WE HAD TWO COMPANIES PROPOSED YOU SEE THAT CASTILLO AND COMPANY AND KIMBERLY HORNE AND THERE WAS THREE MEMBERS ON OUR COMMITTEE ON THE SELECTION COMMITTEE THAT REVIEW THEIR PROPOSALS IN INTERVIEWS AND THOSE ARE A LIST OF THEIR OWN EVALUATORS THE POSSIBLE POINTS WERE 300 POSSIBLE 300 POINTS AND SO KIMBERLY GORDON SCORED A TO 61 VERSUS 200. NOW WHAT WE DID THESE WERE THESE PROJECTS THAT YOU JUST VOTED ON PREVIOUSLY IN THIS PROJECT WE PUT OUT THERE AS A PACKAGE.

AND SO YOU'RE SEEING THIS AS TWO ACTION OF TWO PROJECTS IT WAS ACTUALLY ONE SELECTION PROCESS FOR THESE CONSULTANTS 73 CAME IN YOU COULD STEPHANIE EITHER ONE OVER THE POCKETS OF THE SEE HERE AND I'M ASSUMING THAT THE THREE THE DARKER LINES ARE THE ROADS AND SO THE CONNECTING PATHWAY IS IN SOME SORT OF EXACTLY WHAT WE'RE GOING TO BE DOING AND YOU TRACK

[01:00:07]

YES YOU STEPPING IN AS PARKS MANAGERS OR COUNCILMEMBERS THE THESE BOTH OF THESE PROPERTIES WENT THROUGH A CONCEPTUAL PLANNING PROCESS ABOUT A YEAR AND A HALF AGO AND SO WE GOT BACK FROM THE PUBLIC AND CREATED THE PLAN BASED ON THAT FEEDBACK TO THAT FEEDBACK BACK OUT TO THE CITIZENS THAT OPEN HOUSES ON OR NEAR THE PROPERTIES RECEIVE ADDITIONAL FEEDBACK FINALIZE THE PLANS. THEN WE TOOK THE CONCEPTUAL PLANS OUT TO PHASE TWO PLANNING WHICH IS ACTUALLY CREATING THE CIVIL AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS.

SO WHAT YOU SEE IS THE DARKER LINE IS ACTUALLY TRYING SO BOTH OF THESE PROPERTIES WILL HAVE A PARKING AREA, A GATE, YOU WILL HAVE A RESTROOM BAILEY THE BAILEY HAS A GOLF CART PARKING BUSINESS THAT SOMETHING WE WANTED AND THEN THERE'S GOING TO BE BOLLARDS SEPARATE THE PARKING LOT FROM THE TRAILS THAT PEOPLE CAN'T TAKE THEIR VEHICLES AND DRIVE TRAILS AND THEN THE TRAIL ITSELF IS GOING TO BE A MULTI-USE FOR BIKERS, HIKERS, WALKERS, JOGGERS, DOG WALKERS, BIRD WATCHERS, WHAT HAVE YOU. SO IT'S GOING TO BE WIDE TO BE ABLE TO ACCOMMODATE TWO WAY TRAFFIC. WE TRY NOT TO DO A SINGLE USE TRAIL BECAUSE WE HAVE SO MANY PEOPLE WITH SO MANY DIFFERENT INTERESTS IN THE COUNTY AND SO WE DO HAVE PEOPLE LIKE TO TAKE THEIR TRAIL RIDING BIKES OUT ON THE TRAILS WILL BE POSSIBLE BUT THEN WE ALSO HAVE PEOPLE WHO LIKE TO TAKE IT A LITTLE SLOWER AND WANT TO STOP WATERBIRDS SO WE WANT TO MAKE SURE WE ACCOMMODATE NEEDS. SO WE BUILT THE PARENTS FOR THE TOP THREE USES THAT THE PUBLIC SURVEY REQUESTED. IT'S NOT GOING TO BE ASKED FOR IS YOU KNOW IS AN ARSON TRAIL JUST LIKE THE ONE THAT WE HAVE IT WHICH IS VERY SIMILAR TO WHAT THIS WILL BE IT'LL BE ABOUT THAT SAME SIZED EARTHEN TRAIL AND WE'RE HOPING TO IN THE VERY NEAR HAVE A TRAIL WHEELCHAIR ACCESSIBLE FOR PEOPLE WHO MIGHT WANT TO SWITCH. ISN'T THAT SO ARE YOU GOING TO DO IN THE FUTURE? YES. I'M CURRENTLY WORKING WITH THE LEGAL DEPARTMENT TO TRY AND FIGURE OUT THE LIABILITY AND WAIVER THAT WE NEED. IT'S TO BE SOMETHING PROBABLY SIMILAR TO WHAT HILTON HEAD DOES FOR THEIR BEACH FILTERS. DO YOU HAVE A TIME ON FOR YES.

YES. SO ONCE WE'RE UNDER CONTRACT THEY SAID THAT THEY WOULD TAKE ABOUT EIGHT MONTHS TO DO THE PLANNING AND THEN PERMITTING IS ALWAYS KIND OF AN IFFY ISSUE.

SOMETIMES THAT CAN TAKE A COUPLE OF MONTHS, SOMETIMES THAT CAN TAKE EIGHT MONTHS.

SO WE'RE HOPING THAT BECAUSE OF THE LOW IMPACT AND VERY LITTLE STRUCTURES ON THESE PROPERTIES YOU KNOW THESE ARE CONSERVATION LANDS AND SO WE'RE TRYING TO OPEN THEM UP TO THE PUBLIC BUT RETAIN THAT OBSERVATION NATURE. SO HOPEFULLY WITHIN A YEAR WE'LL BE ABLE TO START CONSTRUCTION AND THEN IT SHOULDN'T TAKE TOO TERRIBLY LONG FOR CONSTRUCTION TO BEGIN BUT THAT WILL BE A WHOLE NOTHER PROCESS THAT'S PUT OUT THROUGH MR. LARSON AND THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT. THANK THE THE PERIMETER YES.

WHAT IS THE THE MANY THINGS I WOULD HAVE TO LOOK THAT UP ON THIS I'M NOT SURE OF THAT OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD TRYING TO USE APPROXIMATELY 100 ACRES THOUGH IN BAILEY IN THE COMMUNITY IS 85. OKAY. THANK YOU.

WELCOME. THANK YOU. RIGHT.

SO BEFORE WE MOVE ON WE ACTUALLY HAVE SOME WE WANT TO BE ON THIS DURING SIMPSON'S COMMENT HE ACTUALLY GOT STUCK IN THE WRECK. MR. MAGGS, YOU STILL WANT TO MAKE THIS IS BRILLIANT. YES, SIR. THIS IS NUMBER 12 AND IT'LL BE THE SAME AS BEFORE. 3 MINUTES. GOOD AFTERNOON, JOE MACK.

I MOVED TO BEAUFORT FOUR YEARS AGO REPRESENTING. TRAILBLAZERS, IF YOU THINK THIS IS WORTHWHILE DOWN ON THE ROAD AT THE GREAT THIS IS ABOUT BUILDING MOUNTAIN BIKING TRAILS, MULTI-USE TRAILS BASICALLY JOGGING TRAIL WALKING THROUGH OUR MOUNTAIN BIKING I RECOMMEND YOU GO TO A WHITE IT'S FELT WHITE MARSH PRESERVE THE MARSH HUNTING FOR 50 ACRES IN SAVANNAH I RECOMMEND YOU GO THERE IF YOU DON'T IF NO MOUNTAIN BIKING TRAIL FASTEST GROWING HIGH SCHOOL SPORT IN THE COUNTRY IT'S EXPLODING AROUND THE COUNTRY BUT IN SOUTH CAROLINA YOU CAN GOOGLE SOUTH CAROLINA MOUNTAIN BIKE LEAGUE I HAVE 98 SIGNATURES ON THE HEADINGS SAYS HUNT FOR MOUNTAIN BIKING TRAILS EVEN BEAUFORT SOUTH ON AND MOST OF THE TOWNS

[01:05:07]

SO THEY PUT THE NAME AND THEY PUT THEIR CITY MOST OF THEM ARE BEAUFORT SOUTH CAROLINA 90% OR MORE. THE VERY FIRST ONE IS SAVANNAH, GEORGIA SECOND ONE IS IOWA SECOND THIRD ONE IS GOLDSBORO AN AWFUL LOT THEN FRONT ROW AND THEN A BUNCH OF BEAUFORT WENT ON THE I WASN'T AT THE NATURAL RESOURCE COMMITTEE TWO YEARS AGO I DIDN'T KNOW IT WAS COMING UP WHEN IT WAS APPROVED. I THINK IT'S ABOUT TWO MILES OF TRAILS I DO HAVE THE PROPOSAL I MADE A COUPLE CHANGES THE ONLY THING THAT IS IN THERE GERMANE TO THE TIME YOU WAS THE SUGGESTION OF FOUR MILES AND THAT THE NATURAL RESOURCE COMMITTEE TWO YEARS AGO SHELBY COUNTY I BELIEVE WAS MR. GREENWAY BUT I COULDN'T STAY SO THAT THEY SHOULD BE PUTTING A CHUNK OF THE GUARD THERE AND I'LL BE HOLLANDER IN THERE ALONG THAT LINE BUT YOU KNOW WHITMORE NOBODY BROUGHT IN A TRUCKLOAD OF DIRT. NO.

YOU KNOW, YOU RESPECT THE NATURE WITH PINE ISLAND AND ON BICYCLE TIME YOU BICYCLE TIME YOU IT WAS SOLD AND ALSO BY KNOCKING HIM PLANTATION ON JOE FRAZIER ROAD PINE ISLAND I LIKE ABOUT FOUR YEARS AGO THERE WAS NO GATE ACROSS THE DIRT ROAD AN APPLICATION THEN IT HAS BEEN GATED SINCE THE LATE 1800S WHICH IS NOT ACCURATE AT ALL IF YOU'D LIKE TO PROVIDE SOME ASSISTANCE FOR THAT BE GREAT MOUNTAIN BIKE I NEVER COME ACROSS A WHEELCHAIR OR A HORSE WHEELCHAIR IN ONE DAY I'VE COME ACROSS DOGS, RUNNERS, WALKERS, BIKERS ALL AND TO WRAP THIS UP ON THE TRAIL THE PEOPLE WHEN THIS CONTRACT EXPIRES ON 1:00 MY CURIOSITY I TO GET THE NAME OF IT IN IMAGINE NOT LIKE E-MAILS BUT ONE STEEL AND CONCRETE BOARDWALKS IS QUITE INTERESTING CONNECTED TO THE FAULT LINE BY LINE BUT NOT THE OTHER VILLAGE NEXT TO IT AND THE LAST THING I'LL SAY SO OTHER PEOPLE SPEAK IS I HAVE THE COPIES HAVE THREE PRESENTABLE COPIES IN ONE LOOSE I PRINTED ABOUT A WEEK AGO SO BEFORE THIS CAME OUT I APOLOGIZE I WAS LATE AND. I'M SORRY ABOUT OF ALL PLACES CITY TRAFFIC LAST THING IS YOU USUALLY THE TRAIL BUILDINGS ALSO DO THE DESIGN OF ALL THE NEW FACES IN HERE.

CONGRATULATIONS THANK YOU. THANK YOU. THANK YOU HAVE YEAH IF YOU'RE OUT IN THE SIERRA THAT'S NOT JUST FOR LACK OF A GREAT DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THIS TOPIC AND ANY MOTION AT THE COUNTY COUNCIL SO REMOVE ANY OBJECTION LET'S MOVE

[13. RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT AWARD TO WILDWOOD CONSTRUCTION FOR CONSTRUCTION SERVICES TO BUILD PICKLEBALL COURTS AT BURTON WELLS PARK]

FORWARD WITHOUT OBJECTION MOVING ON TO NUMBER 13 RECOMMEND APPROVAL TO A CONTRACT AWARD WILDWOOD CONSTRUCTION FOR CONSTRUCTION SERVICES PICKLEBALL COURTS AT BURTON WELLS HAVE A MOTION LIKE A MOTION FOR A SECOND FLOOR AND IN DISCUSSION IS A COMMENT WHICH THEY TOOK AS THE NEW PEOPLE ON A TOUR OF BURTON WELLS AND SO WE HEARD ABOUT THE PICKLEBALL COURTS THIS IS THE FASTEST GROWING SPORT AROUND AND SO I THINK THESE WILL BE WELL USED. I KNOW IT'S A LOT OF MONEY. $736,000 BUT I THINK THIS IS A GREAT ADDITION TO THAT. OVER THE YEARS WE'VE PICKLEBALL FOLKS COME BEFORE MUCH TO COUNCIL SYSTEM AND GETTING FORCED PLAY ALONG AND THEY HAVE BEEN MOVING AROUND AROUND THE CITY, AROUND THE COUNTY HERE AND THERE SO TO IT TO PUT THESE A COURT'S WORKING WELL I THINK GOING TO SUFFICE THEY'RE VERY CLOSE FOR ADEQUATE PLAYING FIELDS BUT I A QUESTION ERIC IF YOU MIGHT HELP ME UNDERSTAND AS I LOOK AT THE DIAGRAM CAN'T IN MY MIND I CAN'T PICTURE EXACTLY WHERE THESE WILL BE LOCATED ON THE ON THE GROUNDS YEAH I INCLUDED JUST A DRAWING FROM THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND CERTAINLY THE LAYOUT IF YOU'RE FAMILIAR WITH WILL'S ROOM PART ONE FACING BUILDING YOU HAVE THE SENIOR CENTER ON THE RIGHT IT'S A SEPARATE BUILDING YOU LOOK AT WHAT THE LAWN BEHIND THE SCENES THAT ARE CENTER IS THE LOCATION THIS BIG WALL YOU CAN ACTUALLY SEE IT ON THE EDGE OF THE PAGE RIGHT BY THE RANGERS ENGINEERING LOGO.

[01:10:02]

YOU SEE THAT PARTIAL RECTANGLE THE SENIOR BUILDING BECAUSE THIS IS NEXT DOOR TO THE SENIOR BUILDING SOME ARGUMENT RIGHT NOW. OBJECTION THIS BOARD NO OBJECTION WILL MOVE FORWARD TO COUNTY COUNCIL. I'M SORRY SECOND YEAR SARAH I DID TOM NO THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. MOVING ON TO NUMBER 14

[14. RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT AWARD TO NIX CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. FOR CONSTRUCTION SERVICES TO BUILD RESTROOMS AT BRUCE EDGERLY FIELD IN THE TOWN OF PORT ROYAL.]

RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT AWARD TO NEXT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY FOR CONSTRUCTION SERVICES TO BUILD RESTROOMS AT EARLY ELDERLY FIELD AND THE TOWN OF WORK.

THE FINAL ANSWER GOING TO ANY OBJECTION AS A MOVE FOR NO OBJECTION.

[15. RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT AWARD TO HDR ENGINEERING FOR SOLID WASTE & RECYCLING ON-CALL CONSULTING]