[XI.3. Consideration of an Ordinance Amending the Town of Bluffton Fiscal Year 2023 Budget to Provide to Carry Forward Unspent Expenditures and Encumbrances for the FY2022 Budget to the FY2023 Budget- Second and Final Reading - Chris Forster, Assistant Town Manager]

KNOW IT'S NEXT IS NUMBER THREE CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT THE FISCAL YEAR 2023 BUDGET TO PROVIDE CARRY FORWARD UNSPENT EXPENDITURES AND ENCUMBRANCES FOR THE 2022 BUDGET TO THE 2023 THIS IS ACTED UPON READING WERE THERE ANY CHRIS NELSON YES.

SO IN THE AMERICAN COUNCIL IS MORE CHANGE HIS FIRST READING WE RECEIVED WORD THAT WE RECEIVED A STATE PROVISO SECURED BY BURDEN OF $100,000 GOING TO BE DIRECTED TOWARDS OUR POLICE DEPARTMENT AND THAT THOSE FUNDS WILL BE DEDICATED TO THE UPGRADE AND REPLACEMENT OF POLICE BODYCAMS THAT IS THE ONLY CHANGE AT THIS POINT UP YOUR MOTION ANY QUESTIONS AT FRED SANDERS IS HIS SECOND AND FINAL MEETING. IT'S SOMETHING WE DO EVERY YEAR. WE CARRY AND IF THERE ARE NO QUESTIONS IS THERE A THANK YOU MOTION TO APPROVE THIS SECTION THE FINAL READING OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING A FISCAL YEAR 2023 BUDGET TO PROVIDE FOR OF CERTAIN FUNDS COMMIT ADDITIONAL FUNDS TO THE CAPITAL ASSET RESERVE AND TO ALLOCATE SOURCES OF REVENUE FOR THE SAID FUNDS TO CARRY OVER UNSPENT EXPENDITURES AND ENCUMBRANCES FROM THE 2022 BUDGET TO THE 2023 BUDGET.

SO THE 30 SECONDS SO ANY DISCUSSION, ALL AFFAIRS I WOULD SAY THAT I'M OPPOSED THAT SHAMAS FUTURE NATURE UP AND DOWN THE KNIFE YOU'RE ITEM NUMBER FOUR CONSIDERATION

[XI.4. Consideration of Approval of an Amendment to the Master Plan for New Riverside Parcel 9 Consisting of +/- 293.1 Acres of Land Located North of New Riverside Road at Mainland Lakes Drive and Zoned New Riverside Planned Unit Development – Kevin Icard, Director of Growth Management]

OF THE APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE MASTER PLAN FOR NEW RIVERSIDE PARCEL NINE CONSISTING OF 293 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED NORTH OF NEW RIVERSIDE ROAD MAINLAND LAKES AND IT'S NOT A NEW RIVERSIDE PLAN IN THE BACK OKAY THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THIS REQUEST IS FROM THE APPLICANT JOHN HALL STONE WITH AUTHORIZATION FROM PRITCHARD FARM LLC.

THIS IS AN AMENDMENT TO PARTIAL LOAN ALSO REFERRED TO AS THE LEASE NEW RIVERSIDE MORE SPECIFICALLY THE AMENDMENT IS FOR AN ADDITIONAL 144 RESIDENTIAL LOTS BE INCLUDED INTO THIS MASTER PLAN. PLEASE NOTE THAT THOSE UNITS HAVE ALREADY BEEN THE OWNER ALREADY OWNS THOSE UNITS SO. THESE ARE NOT NEW UNITS IT'S JUST APPLYING THEM TO THIS MASTER. WHAT I'VE DONE HERE IS KIND OF THAT LET ME GO BACK REAL QUICK SO YOU CAN SEE THAT THE THE EXISTING MASTER PLAN WHICH IS LOCATED OFF OF RIVERSIDE ROAD IT'S ADJACENT TO MAE RIVER HIGH SCHOOL WHEN THIS CAME CAME THROUGH A COUPLE OF YEARS AGO THEY FOCUSED ONLY ON THE 365 LOTS AND THAT'S WHAT YOU SEE WHERE IT SAYS EXISTING WHAT THEY ARE NOW DOING. AND IF YOU REMEMBER WE SPECIFICALLY STATED THE APPLICATION WOULD BE COMING BACK IN THE FUTURE AT SOME POINT WILL TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL LOTS AT THAT TIME THEY JUST WEREN'T SURE THE PROGRAMING OF IT.

SO WHAT I'VE DONE HERE IS KIND OF HIGHLIGHTED THE AREA WHERE YOU CAN SEE IN RED UNDER THE PROPOSAL OF THE THE EXPANSION OF THIS MASTER PLAN FROM AN AERIAL STANDPOINT YOU CAN THAT THIS IS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ON THE NORTHERN PORTION OF THAT WAS THIS PARCEL IS WHERE THE AMENDMENT IS BEING REQUESTED THIS WENT THROUGH THE PLANNING COMMISSION THEIR SEPTEMBER 28TH MEETING WHERE THEY RECOMMENDED APPROVAL WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS NUMBER ONE WAS UPDATED PLANNING THERE SHOWED A SECOND ACCESS POINT TO THE NORTHERN CUL DE SAC PARCELS AND THEY COULD BE INFORMATIVE AND REGRESS EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS AND PROVIDE A PREVIEW OF THE REQUESTS FOR THE SERVICE LETTERS. THE APPLICANT PROVIDED ALL

[01:15:04]

OF THAT INFORMATION TO ME SO THEY HAVE MET THOSE CONDITIONS AND THEN AGAIN LET'S SEE YOU CAN SEE ONE OF THE CONDITIONS WE TALKED ABOUT WAS THAT EMERGENCY ACCESS INITIALLY THIS I REFERRED TO IT AS A IN A CUL DE SAC THIS VERSION OF PORTION RIGHT HERE HAS A ONE ACCESS POINT HERE WE ASKED TO WORK WITH THE APPLICANT TO PROVIDE A SECONDARY EMERGENCY ACCESS POINT AND WHAT I'VE DONE HERE IS THERE'S THIS IMAGE YOU CAN SEE THIS VINEYARD SENIOR LIVING OFF OF BUCKWALTER CLOSE TO 78 THIS WAS AN EXAMPLE WHERE THEY DID PROVIDE EMERGENCY ACCESS TO THE REAR OF THE BUILDING IMMEDIATELY FROM BUCKWALTER PARKWAY AND YOU CAN SEE IT'S KIND OF A GRASSY STRIPS AND THERE'S LITTLE NOTCHES RIGHT HERE THOSE ARE LIKE CAT EYES THAT GIVE YOU THE ABILITY FOR IF THERE'S AN EMERGENCY A FIRE TRUCK THIS IS DESIGNED IN SUCH A WAY THAT A FIRE TRUCK CAN CAN TRAVEL OVER IT WITH NO PROBLEMS. SO THE APPLICANT UPDATED THEIR PLANS TO INCLUDE THAT RIGHT HERE.

SO JUST TO GIVE YOU AN OF WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE TO GET THERE AND THAT I'VE DEALT WITH THOSE IN THE PAST AND ASSUME DISCRETION OR SOMETHING UNDERNEATH THERE TO GIVE IT A HARD SERVICE THE SUBSTANTIAL THE EQUIPMENT YES SIR. IT IS ENGINEERED TO BE OF THEY HAVE THEIR PROPOSED PHASING PLAN. ONE OF THE CONCERNS THAT WE'VE HAD IN PREVIOUS MASTER PLANS TO DEAL WITH PARKING THOSE WILL PROVIDE AS LITTLE PARKING AREAS FOR PULL. THIS MASTER PLAN IS DESIGNED A LITTLE DIFFERENT WHERE THEY ACTUALLY ON STREET PARKING SO YOU CAN SEE FROM THIS CROSS WHERE YOU HAVE TO TRAVEL LANES AND THEN YOU HAVE A THIRD AREA WHICH ALLOWS FOR THAT ON STREET PARKING SO YOU HAVE INDIVIDUALS THAT CAN PARK IN THEIR TWO CAR GARAGE. YOU'LL NOTICE THAT THE GARAGE SETBACK IS AT 20 FEET. THAT GIVES THE ABILITY TO PARK TWO VEHICLES IN THEIR DRIVEWAY AND. THEN THEY HAVE THE ABILITY TO HAVE ON STREET PARKING AS SO THIS PLAN YOU WILL SEE THOSE CARVE OUTS OF HOW MANY PEOPLE WOULD BE ABLE TO PARK IN OTHER AREAS IT GIVES THEM THE ABILITY TO BE ABLE TO PARK ON THE STREET FROM A TREE AND SO POST STANDPOINT I'M DONE HERE IS THEY'RE AREAS THROUGHOUT SOME OF THE AREAS THAT ACTUALLY ARE TO BE CLEAR I THEY'RE USED FOR LIKE FOR WRITING FOR HORSES SO YOU CAN SEE THE AREA HERE IS ALREADY BEING ESTABLISHED THERE IS SOME PLACE IN SO THERE'S A LOT OF AS THIS AREA TYPE OF STANDPOINT KIND OF DROPS OFF TOWARDS THE BACK. THERE ARE A LOT OF SIGNIFICANT SIZED TREES IN THAT AREA THAT ARE BEING WE ARE GOING TO MAKE SURE TO WORK WITH THE APPLICANT AS WE GO THROUGH THIS PROCESS AND THE DEVELOPMENT LAND TO BE ABLE TO SAVE AS MANY THOSE TREES, PREVENT THAT CLEAR CUTTING THE GOAL IS TO FOCUS ON WIND DEVELOPMENT WHERE THE PINES ARE LOCATED BUT THEN ALLOW FOR THOSE LARGER TREES BE SAVED.

THIS IS MY AMAZING PHOTOSHOP SKILLS THAT I HAVE TO BE ABLE TO KIND OF GIVE YOU IDEA OF YOU SEE THE EXISTING PORTION THAT'S UNDER UNDER DEVELOPMENT AND WHERE THEY PROPOSED ROAD IS GOING TO BE LOCATED AND THEN SUPERIMPOSE OVER WHERE THE WETLANDS ARE AND THOSE MATURE TREES THAT ARE KIND OF BUFFERED AROUND THOSE WETLANDS FROM OUR REVIEW CRITERIA AND THEN ALL THE REVIEW IN SECTION 3.9 FOR ME YOU HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO APPROVE THE APPLICATION AS SUBMITTED IT'S APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE APPLICATION FROM A REVIEW PROCESS STANDPOINT LAST THIS ONCE PLANNING COMMISSION IN SEPTEMBER AND AS BEFORE YOU NOW IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS I'M ABLE TO ANSWER THEM ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE SITE AND THIS MAY THE PAGE 592 THERE'S A COMMENT THAT SAYS THE COMMUNITY PART MAY INCLUDE NOT LIMITED TO A POOL OPEN AIR PAVILION RESTROOMS PICKLEBALL SOCCER PARKING CERTAINLY TABLESAB AND FIREPITS AND EXPLAIN TO US AGAIN I KNOW THERE HAVE SOME AMENITIES PLANNED BUT WHEN YOU

[01:20:04]

SEE SOMETHING LIKE THIS TO ME IT SEEMS AMBIGUOUS IN THE SENSE THAT YOU'RE SAYING TO PEOPLE WHO ARE BUYING PURCHASING THIS IS WHAT YOU'RE GOING TO GET IN IS IT SO HOW DOES THAT GET EXPLAINED? THIS IS QUESTION I HAVE TWO WORDS.

OKAY. I THINK THE APP CAN PROBABLY BE BETTER EXPLAINED HOW THEY PRESENT TO RESIDENTS AND FROM OUR STANDPOINT IT'S CONCEPTUAL. SO THEY'RE GOING THROUGH THIS MASTER PLANNING PROCESS, IT'S CONCEPTUAL AS TO WHAT THEY'RE GOING TO DO SO THEY HAVE TO A SEAT AT A TIME FOR THE MONEY TO FULLY PROGRAM ON EVERY SINGLE BECAUSE THEY WOULD HAVE JUST RECEIVED THEIR APPROVALS FIRST BEFORE THEY STARTED TO SPEND MONEY TO DO THAT.

SO I THINK HOW IT'S EXPLAINED TO THE APPLICANTS AND RESIDENTS MIGHT BE BETTER SUITED FOR THE APPLICANT TO BE ABLE TO EXPLAIN THAT. OKAY.

IS THAT SOMETHING THAT WE WILL BE GOING? YEAH, WE DON'T THINK SO.

SO YOU KNOW THE COMMUNITY MAY OR MAY NOT HAVE POOL AND IN FACT BECAUSE THEY MAY OR MAY NOT THIS IS THE STANDARD LANGUAGE THAT HAS BEEN IN ALL OF THE NATIONAL PLAYS AND AGAIN IT IS HIGHER LEVEL CONCEPTUAL AND THAT'S JUST THE LANGUAGE THAT WE HAVE INTO I WILL WILL ADD THE NEXT STEPS SHOULD THIS BE APPROVED WOULD BE A STEP WOULD BE THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN ITSELF THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN THAT GOES BEFORE PLANNING COMMISSION AND THEY LOOK AND REVIEW AT THOSE LEVELS OF DETAIL AS WELL AS THE SUBDIVISION.

A SECOND QUESTION ON PAGE 635 IT TALKS ABOUT THE AN ACCESS HAS NOW ESTABLISHED TO ACCOMMODATE POTENTIAL FUTURE CONVERSION TO THE SCHOOL SITE. SO THERE'S A ROLE PROPOSED HERE IN THE PLAN A CONNECTING ROAD TO GO OVER TO THE SCHOOL SITE AND WE SPOKE AND THERE'S RIGHT AWAY ESTABLISHED FOR HOW CAN WE AS A TOWN IS THERE ANYTHING CAN DO AS A TOWN TO DO SOMETHING WE NEED TO MAKE THAT HAPPEN IN THE FUTURE. NO NEW SCHOOL AREA AND EVERYTHING'S NOT BUILT YET BUT HOW DO WE PROTECT THAT NOW THE ROAD SOMEWHERE WHEN WE NEED THAT CONNECTION IT TALKS ABOUT PUBLIC ACCESS WE HAVE PRIVATE ROADS SCHOOLS SAY YOU SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED UNLESS CONNECTING ROADWAYS ARE SO AND MAINTAINING THE TOWN OF THE COUNTY THAT'S REMEMBERING IT RIGHT AND MR. FAIR, I LOOK TO YOU FROM A LEGAL STANDPOINT OF YOU THE PLAN ALLOWS FOR THAT AND THE ACCESS IS THERE SO IT'S SHOWN ON THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN.

IT'S SHOWN ON THE SUBDIVISION PLAN. SO WHEN IT'S RECORDED IT SHOWS THAT THERE IS AN ACCESS AND I BELIEVE IT'S APPROXIMATELY 150 TO MAYBE 200 FEET FROM THE END OF THE PAVEMENT THAT THAT LAST HOUSE TO THE PROPERTY LINE WHERE IT THEN WOULD CONNECT TO THE SCHOOL. I'M NOT SURE WHEN THE SCHOOL SYSTEM IS PLANNING ON CONSTRUCTING SCHOOLS AT THAT LOCATION. SO THE ROAD OBVIOUSLY NOT IT'S NOT NEEDED. IT'S THE SCHOOLS ARE ARE CONSTRUCTED AS ORDER FROM A FUNDING STANDPOINT I'M NOT SURE I MEAN I DON'T HAVE ANSWER AT THIS MOMENT.

IT COULD COME ANYTHING FROM POTENTIALLY YOU KNOW WITH THE COUNTY IMPACT FEES BECAUSE WE JUST DEALT WITH THIS MIDPOINT AND WE THEY CAME TO US FOR ASK THE POINT AMENDMENT WE CAN PUT A MOTION ANYTHING WE WANT WE WANT IT NOW THAT COULD BE A CONDITION SO KERRY CAN SAY NO WHAT IF I'M WRONG AND THEN WE JUST GO THROUGH THIS YOU HAVE RIGHT TO THE CONDITION YOUR APPROVAL IN ANY REASONABLE FAITH. BUT I WOULD ALSO ADD THAT THAT AREA WHERE THAT CONNECTION IS IS PROPOSED HAS IN THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN HAS ALREADY BEEN AND I'M NOT SURE THEY'RE ACTUALLY ALREADY STARTING CONSTRUCTION ON THAT OR NOT.

SO THAT AREA IS NOT OWNED BY PRITCHARD FARMS LLC IT'S OWNED BY COACH K OF ALBANIAN CORPORATION SO THIS AND YET THEY HAVE MANY IN COMMUNITY ARE WE DEALING WITH THE SAME THING WE'RE DOING MIDPOINT IS THIS A SEPARATE BUILDER AS FAR AS I KNOW THIS IS THE SAME BUILDER THE INTENT IS PRITCHARD FARMS AND SELLS THIS TO ALBANIAN CAN'T WE MAKE IT WE CAN BASICALLY THEY ARE COMING FOR AN AMENDMENT. THERE'S A PLAN THAT WAS APPROVED AND NOW THEY'RE COMING BACK. THAT'S A LETTER YOU WANT OUT FAST BUT IN THIS WE CAN MAKE IT A CONDITION THAT IT GETS PAID TO NOBODY AND SO ON BECAUSE WE'RE GOING TO LEAVE UP TO RESIDENTS TO HAVE TO DEAL WITH IT ONE DAY IN A COMMUNITY AND

[01:25:06]

WHY AREN'T WE MAKING A DEVELOPER PAY I DON'T CARE IF IT GOES TO A BURN IT WE LIVE THIS SO WE WANT TO DO THE RIGHT WAY NOW IT WOULD BE ESTABLISHED IT ESTABLISHED I DON'T CARE IF IT GOES TO A TREE SO THAT'S THAT I THINK THAT'S WHERE YOUR POINT IT IS YEAH I DIDN'T ANSWER ALL YOUR QUESTIONS JUST NOW WE'RE GOING TO ASK QUESTIONS AND PULL YOU UP.

YEAH I HAD ONE OTHER UNRELATED OH THE CONSTRUCTION WILL IT IS RELATED TO CONSTRUCTION IS THERE WHAT BECOMES OF THAT THAT . LET ME GO BACK TO THE PLAN I THINK TO THE RIGHT OF THE PROJECT THERE'S A CONSTRUCTION ROAD, IS THAT CORRECT? YES. SO THAT THAT CONSTRUCTION ROAD STAYS THAT'S PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT THAT WAS WHEN PLAN INITIALLY CAME THROUGH WE SAID THAT THERE NEEDED TO BE TWO TWO ACCESS POINTS ONTO NEW RIVERSIDE ROAD SO THAT CONSTRUCTION ROAD WAS ITS CONSTRUCTION HEAVY VEHICLES ARE USING THAT AS A AS OPPOSED TO GOING THROUGH THE MAIN ENTRANCE JUST TO IN ESSENCE TO SAVE THE MAIN ENTRANCE ROAD THAT WOULD THEN BE CONVERTED TO JUST THAT SECONDARY POINT AND THEN USED BY THE RESIDENTS IN THE FUTURE THINK YOU ANY FOR GETTING I DIDN'T WANT ANYTHING FROM YOU I RODE OUT HERE TODAY AND I THINK THEY POINT OUT THAT THAT RIGHT ROAD THAT RIGHT NOW LOOKS LIKE IT YOU INTO THAT OTHER AREA OF THE LAKE IS PRITCHARD FARMS RIGHT IT'S A ROAD HAS A COUNTY SIGN IT TO GO OVER YOU ACTUALLY AND YEAH SO YOU WERE RIGHT SO TO SPEAK NOW GO BACK TO WHERE YOU WORK ALL OF THAT SO SEE WHERE IT SAYS PRIVATE I'LL SEE THE LARGE PROPERTIES I HAVE CLEVELAND PROPERTY WHERE THE RED LINE IS THAT IS IN THAT THE CONSTRUCTION THAT YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT YES. SO THAT ROAD I FOUND OUT TODAY BECAUSE I WENT DOWN THERE IT'S CALLED PRITCHARD FARMS ROAD WELL FARMS ROAD ENDS AND THEN THERE'S A SWATH LAND AND THEN IT CONNECTS TO PRITCHARD FARMS ROAD THAT GOES TO 46 SO I DON'T WANT TO MISS OUT ON A CONNECTION POSSIBILITY ONE DAY FOR THAT THAT ROAD IF THEY'RE BOTH CALLED PRITCHARD FARMS ROAD YOU ALSO CONFUSING FOR THE POLICE TO GO ON PRITCHARD FARM TO REALIZE THEY'RE SUPPOSED BE ON THE PRITCHARD HILL SIDE AND I WANT US TO TALK TO THE COUNTY ABOUT THAT AND I GUESS I JUST DIDN'T UNDERSTAND THE LAND THEY'RE ADDING HAS SHUT IT AND IT'S SPACE WHERE THAT ROAD COULD CONNECT ONE DAY SO DON'T KNOW WHY THEY DID THEY BUY THIS LAND AND ADD IT TO THE TO THE MASTER PLAN OR WHAT WHY ARE WE DOING A MASTER PLAN THAT BECAUSE ARE THEY UTILIZING PHASE TWO OR DID THEY BUY MORE LAND AND PUT IT INTO THIS LAKES YOU HAD A LOT OF QUESTIONS ABOUT THE APPLICANT AND PROBABLY BETTER TO ANSWER THOSE QUESTIONS I SPECULATE ON ON THEY'RE NOT ON THE PLAN YEAH OKAY SO THE AND THAT'S WHERE I GOT BACK HERE TO THE ORIGINAL REQUEST THE AREA THAT'S HIGHLIGHTED IN RED THIS IS WHAT THEY'RE LOOKING TO IN ESSENCE ADD ON TO THE EXISTING PLAN BUT HIS FUTURE DEVELOPMENT PLAN HAS AN APPROACH JUST TO BE BROUGHT IN TO THE LAKES IS WHAT I'M UNDER BUT I THINK UNDERSTAND RIGHT CURRENTLY THAT'S CURRENTLY OWNED BY PRITCHARD FARMS LLC SO THEY OWNED ALL OF THE PARCEL NINE AT ONE POINT AND AS THEY'VE BEEN DEVELOPING THE SITE AND THEY CUT OFF SECTIONS SELL IT OFF TO TAKE OFF YOU KNOW THEY HAVE THEIR LEGAL AGREEMENTS TO FOR THEM TO DO THIS. YES. YES.

AND WHEN THIS PLAN CAME THROUGH A COUPLE OF YEARS AGO WELL AGAIN, WE'VE WE MADE SURE THAT IT SHOWED FUTURE DEVELOPMENT AND I THINK I MAKE SURE THEY'RE GOING TO COME BACK IN THE FUTURE WITH PROBABLY MORE PHASES AND ANOTHER AMENDMENT TO THIS MASTER PLAN.

AND SO THAT'S WHY WE'RE WE'RE CLEARLY ESTABLISHING THAT THAT THEY ARE GOING TO COME BACK WITH MORE AND WE ARE HERE TODAY WITH THE MORE IT IS THE FINAL WORD THAT'S A QUESTION FOR THE AGAIN ANOTHER QUESTION ON YOUR PARKING AND I FIGURED COULD GET ALL THE ANSWERS AT ONCE AND YOU MENTIONED IN THIS THIS PART WE'RE LOOKING AT THE STREET LAYOUT.

YOU DON'T HAVE TO BRING IT UP. I DIDN'T SEE THAT THAT WAS THE WAY THEY DID IT IN THE FIRST SECTION. SO YOU'RE SAYING THE STREETS ARE GOING TO BE DIFFERENT IN THE BACK SECTION WITH THE PARKING LOT IN FRONT OF THE HOUSE?

[01:30:03]

ARE THEY IT'S BEEN LIKE I'M JUST DIDN'T SEE THAT TODAY IN THE IN THE FIRST SECTION AND THE FIRST SECTION IN THE INITIAL PLAN THEY HAD 2 TO 3 SECTIONS.

SO IF THEY HAD A DIFFERENT ROAD OR A DIFFERENT LOT WITH THEY ACTUALLY HAD A SMALLER ROAD AND THEN PROVIDED MORE THEIR SETBACK WAS FURTHER AWAY TO PROVIDE MORE PARKING ON THE PROPERTY. THEY CHANGED THEIR GOING AWAY FROM THAT THAT SMALLER ONE AND FOCUSING ON ALL IT WITH THIS STREET SECTION THAT YOU NOW SEE.

SO IF THERE'S SOMETHING IN IN THE FIRST PART THAT'S ALREADY BEING CONSTRUCTED AT A DIFFERENT THAN THEY LIKE THAT'S ALREADY CONSTRUCTED BUT MOVING FORWARD THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE JUST THE ONE STREET SECTION I DON'T SEE THAT ENAMORED WITH THIS ON SITE ONE I DON'T SEE WHERE YOUR ROAD HAS WIDENED BENEATH TO INCORPORATE YOU KNOW ON WHAT YOU'RE SHOWING US RIGHT NOW WE CAN MAKE SURE THAT THAT IT DOES WITH THAT BY HAVING THE STREET SECTION IN THERE WE'RE SAYING THAT YES YOU ARE GOING TO BE REQUIRED TO THIS. I MEAN THOSE ARE REALLY DIFFICULT TO MEASURE BUT WE'LL MAKE SURE THAT THAT IT REPRESENTS AN ILLUSTRATIVE BUT IT DOES PLAY INTO OUR CONCERNS IN THE PAST ABOUT FRONT LOADING GARAGES WHERE THE SIDEWALK THE CARS ARE IN THE PARKING ON THE SIDEWALK BECAUSE WE MADE THAT CHANGE.

WE DID IT WITH BLAKE'S PRACTICE SO I DON'T WANT IT TO EAT UP WHERE THE SIDEWALK NOW IS MOVING CLOSER TO THE HOUSE IT IS NOT SO THEY STILL WILL HAVE THEY CAN HAVE A YOU CAN HAVE YOUR HOUSE UP TEN FEET BUT YOUR GARAGE HAS TO BE 20 FEEDBACK FROM A CYCLE TRACKS OKAY GOOD.

AND ARE WE USING A TREE ORDINANCE OR NEW TREE ON HIS MANAGEMENT? SURE. WELL ALL THE TREES ARE CUT BECAUSE I WENT DOWN THERE.

I DON'T KNOW. I DON'T KNOW. WE'RE I GUESS THE BUFFER TREES HERE ARE STILL IN PLACE SO OKAY . OKAY.

DO YOU WANT TO ANSWER DID YOU WRITE DOWN THE QUESTIONS AND YEAH THANK YOU BUT YOU GUYS ARE HERE WITH ME THAT WAS A LOT OF QUESTIONS I JUST WANTED IT ALL AT ONCE THAN YOU'RE SITTING IN THE MORNING MEETING OUR PRESENTERS YOUR FARM AND IT SAYS TO WORK AND WORK YEAH SO FIRST QUESTION I THINK WE SHOULD SEEK OUT THE SCHOOL AND THAT WHERE YOU GUYS WANT TO START THAT'S WHAT WE RAISED FOR HIM. YEAH.

OKAY YEAH. SO THE WHOLE ACCESS IF YOU LOOK AT EXISTING CAN SEE THAT THE SCHOOL ACCESS IS ON THE PART OF PORTION OF THE PROPERTY HAS ALREADY CONVEYED TO CAYMANIAN SO THAT DEVELOPMENT OF PROCESS HAS BEEN CLOSED. THEY PURCHASED THE PROPERTY THAT THAT ACCESS POINT WAS THERE AND THAT WOULD BE THAT CONNECTION WOULD NEED TO BE MADE. SO PRITCHARD FARM DOES NOT HAVE THAT HEART RATE AND TERRAIN CURRENTLY RIGHT NOW THAT IS WE DON'T OWN AND NOT REQUIRE SOMEONE ELSE TO DO SOMETHING ON PROPERTY THAT WE DON'T HAVE. HOWEVER CANADIAN IS ALSO PURCHASING THE NEXT PHASE OR THEY'RE UNDER CONTRACT TO PURCHASE THE NEXT PHASE THAT WE ARE HERE TO DISCUSS TONIGHT.

SO WHEN THEY COME BACK FOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW IN THE APPROVAL THAT WOULD BE AN APPROPRIATE TIME TO ASK THEM ABOUT MAKING CONNECTION AND WHEN I CAN GET CONNECTION WITH THAT BECAUSE THEN THEY OWN THE ENTIRETY OF THE PROPERTY BUT AS WE DON'T HAVE THE PROPERTY WE CAN'T USE THAT WHICH IS THAT WHAT WE DID WORKING WITH THE STAFF AS I MENTIONED BEFORE ACTUALLY ALREADY A FULL FINAL VOTE PLANNING PERMIT WAS ISSUED APRIL I BELIEVE AND STAFF COURT MERELY CORRECTED TO SAY HEY YOU DON'T HAVE A SEASONAL SO WE HAVE THAT EASEMENT COVERED EXTENDED TO THE PROPERTY LINE AND IT BE ON PLOT AS WELL ONCE WE PLAN SO THESE AND CLICK THE QUESTIONS YOU WOULD HAVE ANSWERED THAT RIGHT AWAY WELL THERE'S DIFFERENT ROADWAY TO CREW HE SAID THAT WOULD BE CLEAR HE WOULD DO THAT AND I TRIED TO REPORT OUT THAT THERE WERE A LOT ON JUST THE LAST PHASE. OH, IS THIS THE LAST IS THIS THE LAST? ARE THERE OTHER FUTURE DEVELOPMENT ABOVE THAT? IS THAT PER SHIPMENT IS GOING TO SELL IT SO THIS 144 ALREADY YOU ARE THAT IS ALL OF THE ENTITLEMENTS WE HAVE FOR THE PROPERTY THERE ARE BUT THIS NOT PERSONAL 90 SO THAT WAS ALL THE ENTITLEMENTS WE HAVE THE 90 AND AS OF TODAY AS OF TODAY I THINK WE'RE ALL PRETTY FAMILIAR WITH THE RIVERSIDE THERE AREN'T ANY OTHER ARE YOU TO BE GOTTEN THERE SO I FEEL SAFE SAYING THAT UNLESS WE CAN'T TRANSPLANT THIS VERY THING OUT THERE AND WANTS GET US MORE HERE YOU KNOW THAT IS THE END OF THAT SECTION . OKAY LET'S SEE I CAN SEE YOUR

[01:35:09]

STREET A LITTLE BIT SO THE STREETS OUT HERE A LITTLE BIT WIDER, THE 25 FEET WIDE ASPHALT WHEREAS SOME OF THE COMMUTER 22 SO IT DOES ALLOW THAT WIDER AREA IT'S NOT STRAIGHT WE HAVEN'T STARTED BUT TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION EACH LOT ESSENTIALLY THE WAY IS LAID OUT AND ALLOWS BASICALLY FOR FOUR CARS PER LOT WHICH IS OVER AND ABOVE WHAT WHAT THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT WOULD BE. SO THAT'S KIND OF WHAT STRUCTURE AROUND ORIGINALLY AND THAT ACTUALLY PUTS IT ON THOSE FORECASTS FOR THAT INCLUDING PAUL CARS IN THE GARAGE BEFORE CAR STOPS CORRECT CORRECT I COULD SPEAK TO THE AMENITY SO THE AMENITIES ACTUALLY ALREADY PERMIT BY COMING IN UNDER CONSTRUCTION TWO PICKLEBALL COURTS POOL I THINK THEY GOT A LITTLE GRILLING AREA FOR PAVILION. SO TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION HERE THAT IF REAL IT'S BEING ENGINEERED IN THE PARK SO WHERE THE RIGHT YOU KNOW PURCHASED FOR PERMANENT MASTER PLAN AND THEY KNEW YOU KNOW THE ULTIMATE WAS THE SELLER SOMEBODY ELSE THEY WANTED TO LEAVE THAT OPTION OPEN TO ALLOW THOSE VOTERS TO COME IN AND PROGRAM THAT SPACE THEMSELVES SO THAT THAT'S HAVE TO DO YOU GO BACK TO QUALITY? YES. HOW MANY ON SCREEN PARKING AND THEN HOW MANY OVERFLOW PARKING YOU HAVE? WE DON'T REALLY HAVE AN OVERFLOW AREAS IN THIS PLAN LIKE WE HAD LIKE THE LANDINGS FOR INSTANCE THAT WE DID THERE BECAUSE WE'VE GOT A LOT OF STREETS AND THAT'S WHAT WE WERE AND WITH THE CROSS-SECTIONS THAT WAS OBVIOUSLY USING YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD THAT SECTION EXTENSIVELY SO THAT'S WHAT WE CAME UP WITH THE FIRST TIME. SO THIS WHOLE RED LANDING AREA A LOT OF ONE SIDE OF THE ROAD YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE A THIRD LANE PARKING THE WHOLE THE WHOLE WAY NO CARS SO YEAH SURE SORRY I AM CONFUSED ON SOME OF THE WHEN WE DID THE MASTER PLAN ORIGINALLY WE HAD A TWO LONG PROCESS AND ONE WAS DOWNTOWN SMALL AS 40 FEET AND SO WE HAD THIS FOR THE PRODUCTS WE ACTUALLY HAD IT SO THE DRIVEWAYS SO YOU COULD START FOR CARS IN THE DRIVEWAY NOT INCLUDING THE GARAGE. I'M NOT KIDDING ME. RIGHT.

SO SIX CARS SIX CARS PROVIDED HAD A TWO CAR GARAGE. CORRECT.

AND SO REASON WE DID THAT WAS BECAUSE YOU DON'T REALLY HAVE ENOUGH ROOM BY THE TIME YOU SQUEEZE A 40 FOOT LOT WITH A 2018 FOOT DRIVEWAY UNLESS WERE FLIPPING DRIVEWAYS YOU REALLY DIDN'T HAVE ENOUGH GAS PARKING TO BE ABLE TO MAKE IT ON THE SO IN THAT INSTANCE WE MADE SURE WE HAD IT FOR ALL THREE PARTIES BASIS FOR THE SMALLER THAT IS THE NUMBER OF THE ROADWAY WHAT WE DID FOR THIS STREET SECTION WHICH IS FOR THE LARGER LOTS WHERE THERE'S ENOUGH TO PARK IN FRONT OF THE HOME SITE WE WIDEN THE ROADWAY 25 FEET AND THEN WE HAVE TO PUT HER IN GUTTER WHICH THEN BRINGS A HOLE THAT'S TWO THIRDS I THINK FOR CURVING GUTTER WHICH THEN ALLOWS FOR ANOTHER WITH A FOR YOUR 20 FOOT FIRETRUCK TRAVEL PATH AND A BEDROOM FOR AN EIGHT FOOT PARKING ON THE STREET. SO WE HAD ENOUGH ROOM MAKE SURE YOU CAN HAVE PARKING AND SAFE EMERGENCY VEHICLE SO THAT'S THAT'S WHAT WE HAD TWO MODELS WE KNEW WITH THE SMALLER LIGHTS THERE JUST WASN'T ENOUGH STREET PARKING SO WE EXTENDED WE PUSHED THE BUILDINGS BACK OR AT LEAST THE GARAGE BACK TO ENABLE THEM TO PARK MORE BUT IT JUST WASN'T LIKE MOSTLY TO CONVERT MOST OF THEM BUT WAS JUST A SMALLER THE LARGER PRODUCT INSTEAD OF SMALLER.

SO I DID EVERYTHING I DIDN'T WANT IT JUST BECAUSE YOU CAN'T GROW WHILE WE'RE HERE SO THAT ROAD, THAT HEIGHT THAT THE GRAVEL ROAD THE WHOLE ROAD IS LIKE THEY PRETTY FAR IN REVERSE TO AS IT IS A PRIVATE ROAD IT'S BEEN CONSTRUCTED SO IT IS NOT FOR YOUR ROAD THAT CONNECTS OFF OF 46 IT'S A PRIVATE ROAD. I WAS NOT AWARE THAT A STREET HAD BEEN PUT UP THERE BUT I THOUGHT OKAY I'LL IT'S ECONOMY RIGHT SO GET TO THAT MEANS AS A NEWLY CONSTRUCTED PRIVATE HALL TO ACCESS CONSTRUCTION IT'S REALLY ALL IT SERVES BUT IT COULD BE A CONNECTOR ROAD ONE DAY PRITCHARD FARMS RIGHT YOU DON'T HAVE TO DEBATE IT. I KNEW IT WAS LEGITIMATELY UNSAFE BUT DEFINITELY BECAUSE I'M TALKING TO BACON AND I PULLED OUT LIKE OH MY GOSH I DIDN'T KNOW THERE'S A PRESSURE. HOW CONFUSING IS THIS FOR NOT A LOT OF YOU KNOW HOW CONFUSING IS IS CAN THE COUNTY ALLOW IT AND IT WAS A GREEN ZONE. OKAY.

SO YOU I WILL DEFINITELY CHECK IN THAT BECAUSE IT IS A PRIVATE AND PERHAPS THEY DID THAT TO HELP WITH CONSTRUCTION. I'M NOT SURE BUT IT IS INTERESTING THAT THERE ARE TWO VERSIONS ON ROADS BUT THE OTHER ONE IS PROBABLY IN THE COUNTY AND THIS IS STILL BUILDING ALL

[01:40:05]

IN THE COUNTY. NO, I MEAN YEAH WE'RE THE COUNTY RESIDENTS TOO YOU KNOW NOW THAT WOULD NOT BE I DON'T THINK THAT WE ALLOW SO WE'LL CHECK INTO THAT IT WELL AND I GUESS IT FROM AVERY'S I'M GUESSING BECAUSE IT LOOKS AROUND TO GO TO THAT PART WHAT IT DOES IT GOES UP AND IT LOOPS IT RIGHT ITSELF TO SERVICE THE WATER QUALITY ARE YOU GOING TO PAY SO WHAT DOES THAT PRIVATE ENTITY ALLOW AND YOU KNOW USE AT THE MOMENT IS THAT IT'S NOT ON PRIVATE YOUR FARM AND IT UNDER AGREEMENT CAME IN AND IT HAS ACCESS TO EMERGENCY ACCESS ON THEIR PROPERTY AREN'T YOU THAT ROAD SO THERE'S A RIGHT OKAY SO YOU HAVE THAT AND WE HAVE WE HAVE ACCESS SO THERE'S A SHARED ACCESS EASEMENT COLUMN WELL AND PURCHASED AND PART OF FIVE NEAR RIVERSIDE IS PART OF THE TWO THIRDS EASEMENT ACROSS FORT WORTH PROBABLY A SLIVER HERE AND THEN PRETTY FAR GREEN CABLE AND EASEMENT OVER THE HALL RIGHT HERE THAT IS WHERE IS THAT RHODE ISLAND EXACTLY WORKING ON THAT RIGHT FOR US AND YOU JUST IT CONSTRUCTION ROAD ENTRANCE RIGHT IS YOU SERVICE THE WATER QUALITY POND CONSTRUCTION AREA SO WHAT IS THE WATER QUALITY ON IS COMPLETED THERE THE CONSTRUCTION GRAVEL JUST ACCESS THE PROPERTY I MEAN TO THE MAYOR'S POINT OBVIOUSLY WHEN YOU LOOK OUT TO THE FAR LEFT AND YOU SEE A PICTURE OF OUR ROAD AND ALL THE UNDEVELOPED LAND THERE IF YOU COULD POTENTIALLY MAKE THE CONNECTION TO WHAT BACK TO WHERE SHE'S TALKING IT WOULD BE A BOON THOSE BETTER ACCESS FOR THAT WOULD BE WHERE THEY'RE LOOKING TO EXTEND THE MASTER PLAN INTO BECAUSE WHERE THAT ROAD THAT ENDS IS LITERALLY DUE SOUTH OF THAT AND AND THAT'S THE ONLY POINT I WANTED TO MAKE IS THAT THE LAND PLAN LAID OUT WAS DELIBERATE SUCH THAT YOU COULD THERE IS NO LONG IS THERE IS NO CUL DE SAC THAT WOULD BLOCK THE EXTENSION THROUGH SO THE REAL ANSWER IS SO SO WE DIDN'T LEAVE THE LAMPLIGHT OPEN FOR THAT POTENTIAL IT'S NOT NECESSARILY SOMETHING THAT WE HAVE FULL CONTROL OVER TO DO I MEAN AGAIN WE DON'T HAVE IN OUR USE BUT THE OPPORTUNITIES THERE AND IT WAS THOUGHT ABOUT WHEN WE LAID OUT THIS LIKE WELL THE INTENT TO MOVE THE COUNTY IN THE STATE FOR CONNECTOR ROADS NOT TO MAKE YA'LL DO IT BECAUSE IT'S NOT YOUR RIGHT BUT THAT WILL JUMP ON THAT SORT OF CUL DE SAC RELATED TO UPLAND AREA KIND OF MESS MY VISION OF THAT MY WHAT ABOUT GATES AND WHAT IS WITH GATES? IT IS A GATED COMMUNITY I DON'T KNOW THEY HAVE OPERATE I DON'T KNOW IF THEY ACTUALLY WERE CLOSING BUT YOU KNOW OBVIOUSLY IF YOU TRIED TO MAKE THE CONNECTION BETWEEN THE DEVELOPMENT AND THE PRITCHARD FARMS ROAD OF IT'S A GATED COMMUNITY THEY'RE NOT GOING TO GO FOR IT. IT IS A IT IS A PRIVATELY. OKAY.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS AND YOU'LL BE GIVING ADDRESS SO OFTEN SO I DON'T HAVE STAFF OR WHOEVER DOES THE MANDATORY PAVING. OKAY AND SAYS I THINK THE INTENT IS GET THESE CONNECTIONS TO OTHER PROPERTIES PAID SO IF IT FALLS ON Y'ALL OR PLANNING COMMISSION CAN WE AND WE LET YOU KNOW NOW DO YOU NEED THAT WITHIN THE MOTION ARE YOU ALL TAKING TAKING WELL THEY SAID SO CAYMANIAN IS DEVELOPING THE BOTTOM HALF WHERE THEY AM TALKING ABOUT IS WHERE THE GATE THE ACCESS POINTS TO THE FUTURE SCHOOL LIVES SO WE CAN'T MAKE SOMETHING GOTTEN ON THIS LAND.

DO IT AT ONCE PURCHASES IT SO THEY ARE ENTITLING IT FOR HAVING SO WHEN THEY HAVE IT AND IT COMES BACK TO PLANNING OUR STAFF THAT'S THE TIME WHERE WE NEED TO TELL THEY NEED TO PAY THOSE RENT BUT IT WON'T COME BACK TO US. WE JUST IN WHAT IF IS A PRIVATE COMMUNITY SO HOW CAN WE SAY WE WANT YOU KNOW WHEN YOU COMMUNICATE TO TO OTHERS IF IT'S PRIVATE BUT IT ISN'T OKAY GIVING THAT COMMUNITY ACCESS TO THE SCHOOL WITHOUT GETTING ON NEW RIVER COMMUNITY AND IT GAVE THE SCHOOL EMERGENCY ACCESS OUT OF THE SCHOOL CAMPUS.

OKAY. VERY DIFFICULT TO IMPOSE A CONDITION ON PROPERTY THAT SOMEONE OWNS SO ON BUT IT WILL BE OWNED BY THAT OWNER PROBABLY AFTER SEVEN YEARS AGO IT'S GOING TO BE SOLD THEY HAVE A NAME AND WE KNOW IT VIETNAM SO IT A WORST CASE ZERO IT IS NOT

[01:45:01]

I WOULD HATE TO TIE APPROVAL TO THAT. NO, NO I'M NOT GOING TO OKAY.

BUT WE WILL BE DIAGNOSED DURING THE DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL OF THE DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL PROCESS STAFF CAN CERTAINLY PUSH PUSH AS HARD AS POSSIBLE AND A SCHOOL BOARD MAY NOT ALLOW THAT ENTRANCE RIGHT. YOU KNOW IT'S NOT BECAUSE IT'S LIKELY IS NOT YOU KNOW THEY DON'T WANT PEOPLE GOING NOW WHEN THE RESIDENTS START COMPLAINING THAT WE DIDN'T HAVE A DEVELOPER IN L.A. MANAGEMENT SO THE SCHOOL DOESN'T ARE NOT SEEING TOO MANY TOWNS WHERE ROADWAYS AND IT FALLS ON RESIDENTS AND THEY SPENT TIME WHEN YOU WERE THIS COMPETITION OKAY SORRY I DON'T WANT TO OBLITERATE YOU KNOW LIKE THE WE ACTUALLY WHEN WE WERE UP FOR MASTER PROGRAM THE FIRST ROUND I THINK THE TOWN REQUIRED THE SCHOOL TO HAVE THREE POINTS OF ACCESS AND THEY ONLY HAD TWO SO THEY ACTUALLY ASKED FOR US TO PROVIDE THE CONNECTION TO MEET THE TOWN REQUIREMENT TO HAVE THE THREE POINTS OF ACCESS.

SO THAT'S WHY THERE'S AT THE POINT THAT GOES THROUGH HERE OKAY THANK YOU THANK YOU GOOD YOU'RE DOING ENOUGH. OKAY. YEAH.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? THERE'S A LOT OF HOUSES HERE. I WAS EYE OPENING TODAY WHEN I CHOKED BACK AS FAR BACK AS I DROVE. I UNDERSTAND THE SCHOOL'S FRUSTRATIONS TODAY AND NOT AT ALL. WE REALLY GET A BETTER FEEL FOR THIS FROM YOU ALL WHEN YOU DRIVE APPLICATION. OKAY.

AND NOW THEY'RE IN MOTION TO APPROVE THE REQUEST TO AMEND THE MASTER PLAN FOR NEW RIVERSIDE PERSONAL LIFE CONSISTING OF 29.3 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT NEW RIVERSIDE ROAD AND MAINLAND LAKE STRONG HANDS ON NEW RIVERSIDE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SOME THE FIRST SEVEN IN DISCUSSION ON PRIVACY THE SAME TIME A STATEMENT THAT

[XI.5. Consideration of an Ordinance to Amend the Town of Bluffton Code of Ordinances Chapter 23 – Unified Development Ordinance, Article 5 – Design Standards, Sec. 5.8.3, Lot and Building Standards, Table 5.8.3.A (Lot Types by District) and Table 5.8.3.B (Lot Standards) - First Reading - Kevin Icard, Director of Growth Management]

JAMES NUMBER FIVE CONSIDERATION OF AN AUDIT IN THE CAMBODIAN CODE OF ORDINANCES CHAPTER 23 ARTICLE FIVE LOT BUILDING STANDARDS AND THE TWO TABLES THE IN THE MOTION THIS IS FIRST READING THIS WAS PULLED BY ME SEVERAL MONTHS AGO BECAUSE I THOUGHT WE WERE IN THE PROCESS OF DOING THE RIGHT PLAN IN ALL OTHER AREAS AND I HAD SOME FEEDBACK FROM RESIDENTS THAT LIVE OUTSIDE OF OUR 92% THAT WONDERED WHY IT WASN'T ON THERE SO.

I ASKED KEVIN TO PUT IT BACK ON SO IT'S ALREADY GONE THROUGH PLANNING COMMISSION AGO? YES THAT IS CORRECT. THAT'S WHAT YOU'RE SEEING. YOU'LL SEE THAT? YES. YOU DON'T HAVE THAT INFORMATION HERE JUST YET SO WHAT WE'RE HERE FOR THIS EVENING IS SOME PROPOSED AMENDMENTS DEALING WITH LOTS AND LOTS AREAS SPECIFIC REQUIRING THE MINIMUM DRIVEWAY SETBACKS FOR PARKING THE THIS IS RELATED TO PROJECTS OUTSIDE OF THE HISTORIC DISTRICT SO I'VE KIND OF BLOTTED OUT THE HISTORIC DISTRICT DOES NOT REFLECT ANY OF THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS SO EVERYTHING ELSE THAT YOU SEE IN COLOR THAT'S NOT IN THAT LIGHT GREEN WOOD EFFECTS SO THE PROPERTIES THE YELLOW THE PIECE THE PURPLE, THE FUCHSIA AND GREENS THAT ARE NOT FLOODS WOULD BE AFFECTED BY THIS. SOME OF THE ISSUES WERE THE DRIVEWAY LENGTH ELIMINATING UNNECESSARY MIGHT TAKES ADJUSTING OF THE SETBACKS AS WELL AS LONG COVERAGE FOR VARIOUS LOT LOT TYPES AND THEN IMPROVE SOME OF THE FORMATTING .

ONE OF THE CONCERNS THAT WE HAD IS THE WAY THAT THE UNIFIED MELT ORDINANCE IS DESIGNED FOR NON HISTORIC DISTRICT PROPERTIES IS THESE LOT TYPES ALLOW A FRONT SETBACK BETWEEN 12 AND 24 FEET SO A BUILDING CAN BE PLACED THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING TO BE PLACED ANYWHERE WITHIN THAT AREA. THE PROBLEM IS THAT IT DOESN'T REFLECT PARKING SO THEN YOU HAVE A BUILDING THAT IS UP TO 12 FEET THEN YOU DO A FRONT LOADED GARAGE WELL THEN YOU'RE HALF OF YOUR VEHICLE AS INNOVATIVELY. SO AGAIN YOU TALK ABOUT FINDING AREAS THAT WE NEED TO MAKE IMPROVEMENTS TO THIS IS ONE OF THEM.

HERE'S AN EXAMPLE OF A SHALLOW DRIVEWAY VERSUS A LONG DRIVEWAY.

THIS IS YOU CAN SEE WHERE IF THE GARAGE SET BACK AT THE SAME OF THE DWELLING UNITS WE BE PARKING IN FRONT OF THE SIDEWALK AND OR ROAD HERE'S AN EXAMPLE THIS IS AN EXAMPLE THIS IS IN BLUFFTON WHERE VEHICLES ARE AND YOU CAN SEE THAT WITH THE THE SIDEWALK WAS WAS PLACED

[01:50:06]

BELOW APPROPRIATELY. THIS IS A SIDE THAT THAT PROBABLY SHOULD HAVE BEEN A FRONT LOADED PRODUCT. SO THIS WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO GET AWAY FROM ALLOWING THIS TABLE RIGHT HERE I KNOW THAT YOU ALL ARE PROBABLY LOOK AT THIS EVERY SINGLE DAY.

I DO. SO WHAT WE'VE DONE IS WE'RE GOING THROUGH WE HAVE LOT SITES THAT ARE ARE JUST NOT APPROPRIATE. WHAT WE'RE DOING IS ELIMINATING SOME OF THESE LARGER LOT TYPES THAT ARE THAT ARE WE DON'T SEE THAT THAT ANYONE HAS EVER YOU KNOW, SUBDIVIDED THE PRIVATE PROPERTIES TO THAT THAN THE ACTUAL THE LOT WHERE WE'RE MAKING SURE THAT THE LOT WITH OUR ASSISTANT CURRENTLY THE WAY IT'S WRITTEN IS YOU KNOW YOU MAY HAVE A LOT IS A MINIMUM LOT WITH A 50 AND A MAXIMUM OF 70 AND THEN YOU GO TO 70 AND THEN 91 THE PROBLEM IS IS THAT IF SOMEONE BUILDS A 70 FOOT LINE WHICH ONE ARE THEY? ARE THEY A MEDIUM OR ARE THEY A LARGE LOT WITH SO WE'RE WE'RE CLEANING UP SOME OF THOSE INCONSISTENT ALSO WE'RE MOVING SOME ADDITIONAL LIGHT TYPES THAT ARE APPROPRIATE AS WELL AS HANDLING OF THE SIDE SETBACKS AND THEN ALSO AT SOME POINT YOU HAVE TOO MANY ASTERISKS AND PEOPLE DON'T KNOW WHAT THAT IS. SO CHANGED THE FOOTNOTES TO NEW NUMERICAL AS OPPOSED TO ASTERISKS AND MAKING SURE THAT ANY ANYONE THAT HAS IF YOU HAVE A PRODUCT HERE THIS IS LIKE A HOUSE LOT WHERE IT'S A MINIMUM TO THE MAXIMUM 24 YOU CAN STILL HAVE YOUR HOUSE A PORTION OF YOUR HOUSE AT TEN FEET BUT THEN YOUR DRIVEWAY WOULD HAVE BE PUSHED BACK TO MAKE SURE THAT SOMEONE COULD HAVE THEIR CAR THEIR DRIVEWAY EVEN IF A PORTION OF THE HOUSE WAS PUSHED TOWARDS THE FRONT SO YOU CAN HAVE A PORTION OF THE HOUSE PUSHED UP AND IN THE DRIVEWAY PUSH BACK ALSO TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE ELIMINATION OF THESE LOT TYPES HERE WE HAVE ANOTHER TABLE IT'S JUST A JUST A SHOWING BASED OFF OF THE VARIOUS ZONING DISTRICTS WHERE IT'S ABOUT SO AGAIN WE'RE MOVING BEING CONSISTENT IN REMOVING THOSE LOT TYPES FOR THE REVIEW CRITERIA ARE ALL MET IN THIS PLANNING COMMISSION THIS IS IN FOR OF PLANNING COMMISSION BACK IN JANUARY WHERE THEY VOTED 4 TO 2 AND THEY RECOMMENDED TO MAINTAIN MAXIMUM ONE COVERAGE FOR THE ESTATE LOT OF 50% INSTEAD OF THE 40% AND THEN REQUIRE ALL TYPES WITH A MINIMUM ALONG WITH THE 40 FEET TO HAVE YOUR ACCESS FROM THE REAR PART.

AND NOW I HIGHLIGHTED THIS PORTION RIGHT HERE WHERE IT SAYS ALL LOOK THE CONCERN IS THAT WE HAVE OTHER LOTS IN HERE THAT ARE BELOW 40 FEET SO IF YOU HAVE A TOWNHOME SO TOWNHOMES WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A SINGLE HOUSE THAT IS ATTACHED. SO TOWNHOMES YOU MAY HAVE SIX UNITS IN ONE BUILDING. WHAT HAPPENS IS A THEN PREVENT SOMEONE FROM HAVING A FRONTLOADED PRODUCT COMPLETELY THAT MEANS THAT THEY WOULD HAVE TO HAVE EVERYTHING WE'RE IF THE TOWN OF BLUFFTON DECIDED TO DO FOR A WORKFORCE AFFORDABLE HOUSING PRODUCT WHAT THIS DOES IS IT ELIMINATES US TO HAVE THE ABILITY TO HAVE FRONT LOADED PRODUCT AND IT FORCES YOU HAVE EVERYTHING THE BACK WHEN YOU DO THAT AND IT CAUSES COSTS MORE THAT MEANS YOU STILL HAVE TO HAVE A ROADWAY YOU NOW TO HAVE AN ALLEY FOR EVERYTHING TO ACCESS OFF OF THE ALLEY ALL OF THAT WHICH CAUSES YOU TO HAVE TO CHARGE MORE MONEY. SO FROM A COST SAVING WE WANT TO GIVE IT FLEXIBILITY TO OURSELVES AS WELL AS ANYONE IN FUTURE.

SO WHAT THE ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDED IS THAT WE WOULD ONLY REQUIRE THE SMALL HOUSE AND THAT IS BEING CHANGED FROM CURRENTLY A 30 TO 50 FOOT WIDE LOG PRODUCT TO 40 TO 50 FOOT WIDE PRODUCT ONLY WE WANT TO COME IN AND DO A SMALL HOUSE LOT BUT THEY HAVE TO HAVE THAT REAR THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT. SO WHAT HAPPENS IS THAT IF YOU HAD A DUPLEX OR A SMALL TOWNHOMES OR A LARGE TOWNHOME OR A MIXED USE LOT YOU WOULD YOU WOULD BE FORCED TO TO HAVE THAT ACCESS FROM THE REAR SO WE WOULDN'T WANT TO PREVENT THAT THAT WAS THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S RECOMMENDATION AND THAT'S A LOT TO SEE WHEN WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THAT.

YEAH. OKAY SO IT'S LIKE I UNDERSTAND THE THE NEED FOR THE AMENDMENT OF THE SHALLOW DRIVEWAY TO THE LONG DRIVEWAY GOING BACK TO THE OMISSION OR REMOVAL OF THE TWO LOT TYPES IS THE FOR THAT AND I SEE SOME OF THE THE REVIEW CRITERIA LISTED BUT IS THE

[01:55:06]

REASON FOR THAT BECAUSE THERE'S IT'S BEEN IDENTIFIED THAT THERE'S NOT ENOUGH SPACE IN THE AREAS THAT WERE ON THAT MAP TO ACCOMMODATE THOSE SO HOMES OR YES SO AGAIN THIS THIS LAW OF STANDARDS CREATED IN 2011 WHICH YOU KNOW BLUFFTON WAS DIFFERENT THEN WHAT WE'RE REALIZING IS THAT THIS IS THAT'S LIKE A HALF ACRE ALMOST AN ACRE SIZE LOT AND THAT'S NOT WE'RE NOT SEEING LOTS LIKE THAT. THE THAT WE'RE ACTUALLY FACED WITH IS A LOT OF LOTS ALONG PARK ISLAND CENTERVILLE AND GO THROUGH ARE VERY ARE LONG LOTS AND SHALLOW SO WHEN YOU HAVE IF YOU HAD A LOT THAT WAS YOU KNOW 155 FEET WIDE WELL THAT MEANS YOU'D HAVE TO HAVE HAD A 50 FOOT FRONT SETBACK SO 50 FEET AWAY FROM THE ROAD AND THEN FOR YOUR REAL PROPERTY LIKE 80 FEET SO THAT THAT'S THE AMOUNT AREA THAT YOU CANNOT BUILD A HOME IN AND IF YOUR LOT IS ONLY 150 FEET IN DEPTH THAT GIVES YOU 20 FEET TOO TO BUILD A HOUSE.

SO THAT'S WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO WE'RE TRYING TO ELIMINATE SO THAT ANY OF THESE EXISTING LOTS WHERE PEOPLE ARE COMING THEY'RE TRYING TO PUT A HOME ON THERE. THEY'RE TRYING TO PUT A MOBILE HOME ON THERE. IT DRASTICALLY RESTRICTS THE AMOUNT OF SPACE THAT HAVE TO BE ABLE TO PUT THESE HOMES ON THERE BY ELIMINATING LAWS BUT STILL HAVING THIS LARGER THE ESTATE LOT MORE IT'S A NICE BUT YOU KNOW MAX WE GIVE THAT FLEXIBILITY AGAIN FOR THEM TO HAVE MORE SPACE TO PUT A HOME IN RIGHT AND I GET THAT AND MY CONCERN IS JUST THAT THERE ARE A FEW RESIDENTS ON SOME OF THE ROADS THAT WERE MENTIONED THAT SO OWN YOU KNOW QUITE A BIT OF ACRES OUTRIGHT INDIVIDUALLY AND IF THERE WAS A DESIRE FOR THEM TO BUILD ONE OF THOSE SOUTH BECAUSE DO HAVE SPACE FOR IT I'M JUST TRYING TO WRITE MY MY AROUND THEM BEING DENIED THE ABILITY TO DO THAT BECAUSE IT'S BECAUSE THAT DESIGNATION IS TAKEN AWAY IS ACTUALLY WE'RE NOT TAKING IT AWAY FROM THEM SO WHAT WE HAVE HERE A FOR THIS IS STATE HOUSE LOT SO YOU HAVE A MINIMUM IN 1981 BUT THERE'S NO MAXIMUM SO THAT A MAXIMUM WHAT HAPPENS WAS IT WAS TRIGGERING YOU IT WAS KICKING UP INTO THAT NEXT COUNTRY HOUSE LINE WHICH RESTRICTED YOU MORE ON YOUR SETBACKS SO BY NOW JUST ESTABLISHING THE STATE HOUSE A LOT YOUR FRONT SET BACK IS 30 FEET AND IN YOUR MIRRORS AT 40 SO IT'S ACTUALLY GIVING INDIVIDUALS ON EXISTING LOTS MORE SPACE TO WITH SO THOSE TWO ARE FALLING UNDER SO STATE HOUSE LOT IS ESSENTIALLY FARMHOUSE COUNTRY AND THE STATE THEY'RE ABSORBED INTO THAT STATE WAS AGAIN I'M GOING AS TO THE THE ALWAYS THOUGHT THAT WE HAD A 20 FOOT REAR SETBACK 20 FOOT FRONT SETBACK IN 25 AND TEN ON THE SIZE SO BUT WHAT WAS THAT CHANGE AND I'M SURE NOW THAT OPERATION FOR THE 20 SO WE HAVE YOU CAN SO HERE AN EXAMPLE OF THAT SMALL HOUSE LOT AS YOU CAN SEE WHAT WAS IT WAS STRUCK THROUGH THE 30 AND THE 50 SO IF YOU HAD SMALL HOUSE LIKE THAT THAT WAS 50 FEET WIDE YOUR FRONT SETBACK WAS BETWEEN TEN FEET AND 24 FEET. SO YOU HAD THAT TO PUT IT AT 24 FEET. THE PROBLEM THAT WE WERE THEN FACED WITH IS THAT WE COULDN'T REGULATE AND TELL YOU IF YOU PUT IT AT TENNESSEE WE NO PROVISIONS IN PLACE TO MAKE SURE THAT YOU WERE PROVIDING PARKING THAT WAS ADEQUATE AND NOT ENCROACHING OVER THE RIGHT OF WAY. WE ACTUALLY HAD A DEVELOPMENT WHERE WE HAD THAT ISSUE AND WE MADE SURE THAT THEY DID PROVIDE THAT THAT AMOUNT OF SPACE FOR THE PARKING IN THE DRIVEWAY TO MEET WITH ME AND TO THE DIFFERENT WAY YES ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT A DEVELOPMENT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT A SINGLE LOT BUT OF SO I THINK SOME OF THEM WERE SMALL LOT AND LIKE YOU DESCRIBED EARLIER USUALLY A LOT NARROW ROOM LOTS AND SO THEY CAN'T REALLY BUILD A LOT

[02:00:02]

SMARTER FOR THIS HOME IN THIS SO THE STRUGGLE IS ALWAYS GOING TO BE A HOUSE OF ALWAYS GOING TO BE WHAT OF HOME WILL FIT ON MY LAP THIS IS WE LOOKED AT I DON'T SEE HOW I DON'T SEE WHERE YOU SAYING WE WANT TO HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR YOU TO STILL NOT BE IN A HARDSHIP BECAUSE YOUR LOT IS NOT A BIG ENOUGH FOR YOU TO PUT ANYTHING ON IT BECAUSE IT IS NOT A MINIMUM AND TEN FEET ON THE SIZE 20 AND IN FRONT TO 20 IN THE FRONT 20 ANYWHERE AND TEN ON THE SIDE LIKE WE SEE WE HAVE AROUND ALL THE BLUFFTON RIGHT NOW ESPECIALLY IN OLD TOWN YEAH SO AND IN THE HISTORIC DISTRICT AND THE HISTORIC DISTRICT IS BASED OFF OF YOUR BUILDING TYPE SO DIFFERENT BUILDING TYPES ALLOW DIFFERENT SETBACKS AND THAT'S WHY I WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THIS IS NOT ASSOCIATED WITH THE HISTORIC DISTRICT TYPICALLY THIS IS GOING TO BE FOR PROPERTIES LIKE I SAID ABOVE SIMMONS THEY'LL GO TO SOME OF THEIR IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD CORE THAT WE HAVE THAT WOULD BE ON ADJACENT STREETS, SOME ON BACK OUT AND CLOSER TO MAIN RIVER. THE INTENT IS STILL DO YOU SEE ANYTHING IN THE WHITE HERE IS IS NOT BEING TOUCHED ANYTHING IN THE COLOR IS WHAT IS BEING TOUCHED.

SO YOU KNOW, YOU COULD STILL HAVE IF YOU HAD A HOUSE THAT IS, YOU KNOW, 40 YOU KNOW, 49 FEET WIDEU TAKE YOUR FIVE FEET OFF OF EITHER SIDE. OKAY.

SO GIVES YOU NOW 39 FEET OF WIDTH TO PUT IN A BUILDING IN TYPICALLY YOU THEN HAVE 16 TO 20 FEET FOR A TWO CAR GARAGE THAT. YOU HAVE A PORTION OF YOUR THE REST OF YOUR BUILDING THAT THAT YOU COULD WORK WITH. WE'RE NOT WE'RE NOT WE'RE NOT RECOMMENDING CHANGES TO THOSE THOSE SIDE SETBACKS. OKAY.

SO THE AND I'M WE I HERE I TALKED TO SEVERAL RESIDENTS OUT THERE AND CONCERNS WON'T GO AS LONG AS I JUST PULLED UP THE LIGHTS MOST OF THE LOT WIDTH BY COLLEAGUES ITSELF ARE ABOUT FEET SO IT'S NOT THAT NARROW THAT WE'RE THINKING IN I THINK THERE WERE SEVERAL IN GO TO THAT WERE 54 BUT THE CONCERN THAT SOME RESIDENTS HAVE THAT I'VE HEARD IS WHAT IS IT DOES THIS ELIMINATE THIS PERPENDICULAR ROW OF MOBILE HOMES GOING DOWN NOW WOULDN'T THEY MORE BE FORCED TO BE ON THE WHERE THEY HAVE TO BE MORE FRONT FACING SO WHERE DO THE MOBILE HOMES FIT INTO THIS CHART DOES THAT DOES THAT PUSH THE LANDOWNER IF THEY WANT TO DO A PUT A MOBILE HOME AND NOW YOU'RE NOT LOOKING AT THE SIDES OF THE HOME GOING ON, YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE TO LOOK AT THE FRONTS WHERE THE FRONT PORCHES ARE MORE IN THAT IN THAT KIND OF MAKING THAT LIKE WIDTH NOT AS NARROW. SO THEY HAVE HAVE A WIDER LOT IF IF THEY ARE IF SOMEONE OWNS AN ACRE OF LAND AND THEIR GOAL IS TO SUBDIVIDE INTO SMALLER PORTIONS THEN WE'RE MAKING SURE THAT THEY'RE DOING THE SMALLER HOUSE LINE THEY CAN DO NO NARROWER THAN 40 FEET BUT IT'S A SMALL HOUSE A MOBILE MOBILE HOME AT THAT A MOBILE HOME IS TYPICALLY ANYWHERE BETWEEN 60. WHERE DOES IT FIT IN THIS TABLE INTO SO YOU'LL HAVE TO WOULD HAVE TO FIT IN THE LOT IN THE YES AND IF YOU HAD A LOT OF THAT IS 90 FEET IN WIDTH THEN YOU HAVE 15 FEET ON EITHER SIDE SO THAT'S GIVEN HER HER HER QUESTION TRIGGERED ANOTHER QUESTION DOES THIS CHANGE IF HAVE OTHER PEOPLE LAND RIGHT NOW YOU CAN HAVE BEFORE DWELLING ON ON AN AIRPLANE WOULD THAT CHANGE THE NUMBER OF THE THAT YOU CAN HAVE ON THOSE ON THAT ON AN ACRE IN THE RESIDENTIALLY ZONED DISTRICT YOU'RE STILL ONLY TO FOUR UNITS PER ACRE SO HOWEVER YOU DECIDE TO SUBDIVIDE IF YOU HAVE AN ACRE AND YOU'RE TRYING TO SUBDIVIDE YOU STILL HAVE TO SUBDIVIDE WHERE YOU DON'T YOU CAN'T SUBDIVIDE TO TRY TO GET SIX UNITS THAT NOW THE OTHER THING IS IS IF YOU HAVE ONE ACRE AND SO ON AND DO ALLOW FOR AN INDIVIDUAL TO PLACE MULTIPLE MOBILE HOMES ON ONE LINE THAT'S STILL WHAT'S HAPPENING IS SOME

[02:05:02]

OF THESE LARGER LOTS WE HAVE WHERE INDIVIDUALS ARE TRYING TO PUT MULTIPLE AMOUNT OF HOMES THESE THE LARGER SETBACKS ARE REALLY RESTRICTING THE AMOUNT OF SPACE THAT THEY HAVE TO WORK WITH BY ELIMINATING THESE THESE BIGGER SETBACKS WE'RE FOR MORE LAND WITHIN TO BUILD A WHOLE AREA FOR MOBILE HOMES TO BE PLACED. GUESS I'M GOING TO SEE ANSWERED THE QUESTION THOUGH IF NOT THIS WOULD CHANGE THE AMOUNT OF ALLOWABLE DWELLINGS PER OH IN THAT FOUR ACRE TRACT SO SO THIS BE A CHANGE WE WON'T BE CHANGE.

THOSE ARE ONE KIND OF PRODUCT THAT'S ACTUALLY YES SIR IT WOULD PROPOSE TO MAKE IT EASIER FOR THEM TO THEN PLACE THOSE UNITS ON THERE. I MEAN THOSE AT THE BEGINNING OF THE QUESTION I JUST WANTED TO KNOW YOU HAVE A PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION WHICH WAS THOSE THERE'S ALL LOST THOSE SIX LOTS AND THEN SUBTRACT THE NATION IS THAT IS JUST THE SMALL HOUSE LOT AGAIN THOSE ARE THE LOTS THAT WE REFER TO YOUR ACTIONS ARE TO THE VARIOUS APPROVALS. THIS IS IF YOU COME BACK AS A FINAL READING PUBLIC HEARING NEXT MONTH TO YOU AND THEN I HAVE A PROPOSED MOTION THIS IS BASED ON THE STEPS RECOMMENDATION. OKAY IT'S THEIR MOTION TO APPROVE THE PLANNING RECOMMENDATIONS WHICH CHANGES FOR A MINUTE AND THE TOWN OF BLUFFTON COVE ORDINANCES CHAPTER 23 YOU FIND THE RELEVANT ORDINANCE ARTICLE FIVE DESIGN STANDARDS SECTION 5.8.3 AND BUILDING STANDARDS TABLE 5.3 AND TABLE 5.83 BE AS FOLLOWS TO MAINTAIN THE MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE OF THE ESTATE HOUSE LOT AT 50% INSTEAD OF 40% AS RECOMMENDED BY TOWN STAFF AND REQUIRED A VEHICULAR ACCESS FOR THE SMALL HOUSE LOT TYPE BE ONLY IN THE REAR YARD FOR ALL OTHER LOT TYPES WITH A MINIMUM LIKELIHOOD OF 40 OR FEWER FEET LIKE SMALL TOWN OF LARGE TOWNHOUSES, SMALL MIXED USE AND SMALL WHAT COMMERCIAL TOWN STAFF SHALL ANALYZE EACH LOT TYPE AND DETERMINE VEHICULAR ACCESS SHOULD BE PROVIDED FROM ONLY THE REAR OF THE LOT WITH FINDINGS PRESENTED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AT A WORKSHOP.

SO THERE'S SEVEN SO ANY DISCUSSION SO CLEAR TO ALL YOU DISCUSSIONS WITH TERM WHAT HAPPENS WHEN WE CAN'T GET THE THE OWNERS DON'T WANT TO HAVE REAR PARKING IS THERE IS THERE A WAY FOR THEM TO GET THINKING LOOK LIKE MAYBE THE TOWN MANAGER OR EVEN YOU GET YOU SEE THIS WE WOULD GET WE WOULD LOOK FOR AN ALTERNATIVE TO HELP YOU MAKE A PROJECT WORK OR YOUR PRODUCT THIS PRODUCT WORK SO RESPOND SO WHAT WHAT CAN HAPPEN IS YOU CAN STILL ACCESS FROM THE MAIN ROAD IT'S JUST DRIVEWAY WILL GO ALONG YOUR PROPERTY LINE AND THEN YOU WOULD HAVE TO PARK IN THE BACK YOU KNOW THEY APPEAL TO THE YOU HAVE TO USUALLY OR CHECK THE BOX YOU YOU COULD GET A QUESTIONNAIRE YES YES BUT THE KEY GOING BACK TO THE EXAMPLE YOU SHOWED WITH THE GRAPHIC YOU'RE TRYING TO KEEP THE CARS OF HOUSE FROM SITTING THE FRONT OF THE LOT ON THE SIDEWALK AND THINGS LIKE THAT. YES.

STRUCK IN THE VIEW OF OTHER TRAFFIC MAYBE TO AN INTERSECTION OR ON THE SIDE OF THE THE WHOLE IMPETUS OF THIS WHOLE YES SIR. DISCUSSION.

YES. SO YOU HAD SOMEBODY COMING IN AND DID LIKE IT READY FOR THIS AND ASKING FOR LEEWAY. THEY'RE PROBABLY NOT GOING TO GET IT BECAUSE IT DEFEATS THE WHOLE PURPOSE OF WHAT YOU'RE TRYING TO ACCOMPLISH ANYWAY IN THAT IN THAT EXAMPLE BADLY PUSH THE HOUSE FURTHER BACK OR MAKE THE DRIVEWAY A LITTLE LONGER, IS THAT CORRECT? YES. OR JUST MAKE THEIR WIDER PROBLEM TO MEET THAT NEXT.

RIGHT. BUT BUT BUT IT ALSO CAUSES IT ALSO CAUSED THAT PERSON A LOT MORE TO TO MAKE THAT HAPPEN. SO WE ELIMINATE ONE THING BUT WE HAVE CAUSED A HARDSHIP BECAUSE NOW IS NOT AFFORDABLE OR MAYBE CAN BRING IT TO THIS WAS NOT A FULL ESTIMATE CONCERN UNLESS YOU GO BACK YOU BUSINESS REALLY HAVE TO READ PENCIL HOW LIMITED FURTHER BACK YOU PUSH THE HOUSE YES WE'LL SEE ANY OKAY ANY MORE AFFORDABLE AFFORDABILITY INVOLVED IN THIS

[02:10:05]

IS ALWAYS GOING TO BE OUT YEAH HE'S TALKING THE AFFORDABILITY OF BLUFFTON IS ALWAYS GOING TO BE TO SO WE IF WE I CAN UNDERSTAND NOT WANTING THE SIDEWALK IN THE DRIVEWAY AND BLOCKING OR STUCK IN THE SIDEWALK BUT THE EXAMPLE THAT YOU SHOWED US ON WE ALLOW A DEVELOPER TO PUT A SIDEWALK WHERE HE SHOULDN'T HAVE BEEN WELL NOW WE KNOW BETTER THAT'S TRUE. SO IS YOUDO ADMINISTRATOR HAVE OVERSIGHT HOWEVER YES THE PROCESS IS PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP AREA ADMINISTRATOR IF WE STILL CAN'T RESOLVE IT THEY CAN THEY CAN APPLY FOR A VARIANCE TO THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS IF THERE'S A HARDSHIP CONDITION OR IF THEY BELIEVE ABATED AREA IF THEY CAN APPEAL IT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSIONER AND IF IT IS SOMEBODY WHO REALLY HAS A HARDSHIP NOT A DEVELOPER IS THAT A LESS SEPARATE TO MAKE SURE THIS WORKS? YES, WE DO THAT.

SO I MEAN THERE'S NO CLEAR PATH THIS THIS ALWAYS HAS ALWAYS BEEN IN VARIANCE.

THAT'S ALWAYS BEEN AN OPTION. BUT AFFORDABILITY IS SOMETHING THAT I STILL NEEDS BE PART OF THAT WE WE WE'VE GOT TO BE YOU KNOW WE HAVE TO HAVE EXCEPTIONS FOR PEOPLE THAT ARE TRYING TO BE TO MAKE AFFORDABLE LIVING ANY OTHER DISCUSSION I IF THEY ALL IN FAVOR SAY THOSE

[XI.6. Approval to Authorize a Construction Contract to JS Construction Services, Inc. for Buck Island Road Drainage Improvements (Fiscal Impact: $116,992.38) - Patrick Rooney, Manager of Capital Improvements Program]

SAME OPPOSED THAT'S UNANIMOUS FINAL SIX APPROVAL THE HARD DRIVE THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT THE BASIC FUNCTION SERVICES FOR THE MCCOLLUM ROAD DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS IS IN THIS $190.38 EURO FOR BOAT MOUNTAIN AND THIS IS JUST BRINGING IT TO OUR HE IT IS THE WEATHER IS STILL STRUGGLING WITH THIS CALL FOR US ON THE SECTION YEAH YOU HAD A POSITIVE BETTER YEAR YOU BRING BOTH OF THESE THINGS OR I DON'T WE JUST LIKE TO SEE AT A PUBLIC LEVEL FOR TRANSPARENCY AND TO BE ABLE TO APPROVE IN PUBLIC I DON'T THINK IT'S ANY OF THOSE SO WELL WE HAVE IT IN OUR PACKET AT THE PACKET YEAH IF YOU'LL PULL THE PACKET THAT'S ONLINE YOU CAN JUST CLICK ON YOUR STAFF REPORT. YEAH IT'S ALL LINKED TO THE YOU GO BACK AND SEE IF YOU HAVE THOSE WHAT KIM SAID WE FOR THE PACKET APOLOGIZE SO IT'S FUN. FINGERS CROSSED I FIRST HEARD A LOT OF WORK FROM YOU WHAT HAPPENS OUT I KNOW SEVEN ITEMS SIX JUST ROLL OUT IT SHOULD BE A LETTER TO SCROLL DOWN AND THEY GET TO DO THEIR POCKET PACKET PACKET CLICK ON THE PDA TAB UNDER A PDF RECORDING GO FOR THAT AND I'M GETTING I'M GETTING GET YOUR NUMBER SIX YEAH THAT'S NOT IT THAT'S NOT IT IT WOULD ONLY IF YOU CLICK ON PACKET BUT SCROLL ALL THE WAY DOWN ALL THE WAY DOWN TO NUMBER SIX THEY ARE STOP RIGHT THERE NOW WELL IF YOU WANT TO DO YOUR PRESENTATION GO AHEAD AND PRESS IS THAT REFRESH. YEAH SO GOOD EVENING ALL THE GUYS GOT THE NOTICES PRESENTED HERE THAT I HAD AN OPPORTUNITY A COUPLE OF TYPES OF PROJECTS YOU KNOW YOU CAN JUST DO THE HIGHLIGHTS IT SO BEFORE YOU HERE IS GIVE YOU A LITTLE BACKGROUND AS THE BUCKEYE ON THE ROAD DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AS THE NAME SUGGESTS IS

[02:15:01]

LOCATED ON THE BUCKEYE ON THE ROAD THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PROJECT WILL BE TO REDUCE THE RISK OF FLOODING ALONG THE ROADWAY AND THE NEARBY STRUCTURES THE PROPERTIES BY REPLACING TWO EXISTING COLORS THAT EARNED THE RIGHT BY THE 324 INCH REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPES. THE PROJECT WAS ORIGINALLY ADVERTISED IN MARCH OF THIS YEAR. NO BIDS WERE RECEIVED THROUGH SEVERAL DISCUSSIONS WITH STAFF AND CONSULTANTS. IT WAS DECIDED TO RE ADVERTISE THE PROJECT IN JULY WE DID THAT ONE OBJECT WAS RECEIVED FOR THE PROJECT FOR $163,216 B F THE COST EXCEEDED ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE AND APPROVED BUDGET FOR THE PROJECT SO STAFF MET WITH THE CONTRACTOR AND RE SCOPED AND DISCUSSED WAYS TO ENGINEER THE PROJECT AND RESULTED IN A NEW CONSTRUCTION COST OF $116,992.38 THE THE DURATION FOR THE PROJECT IS ANTICIPATED TO BE ABOUT 60 DAYS AND IT WILL INCLUDE A PLANNED CLOSURE ALONG THE CANYON ROAD FOR ABOUT TWO WEEKS.

ANY. IS THERE A MOTION TO AUTHORIZE TOWN MANAGER TO ENTER INTO THE AGREEMENT WITH VARIOUS CONSTRUCTION SERVICES FOR CONSTRUCTION BY COLLIN ROAD DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. THE AGREEMENT INCLUDES A COMMITMENT FROM THE TOWN OF FOR $116,992.38 AND A 10% CONTINGENCY TO BE PAID FROM THE APPROPRIATION FUNDS FROM THE CARES ACT. SO ANY DISCUSSION? YES, THE QUESTION IS YES I WOULD ASSUME THAT YOU WILL HAVE SIGNAGE OUT IN THE TO THE RESIDENTS IN FAR IN ADVANCE.

YES SIR, ABSOLUTELY. YES, SIR. AND THE QUESTION IS WHEN ONE WHEN WE GET THE BECAUSE WE NEGOTIATE TO PROTEST THE VENUE DID WE ALSO CHANGE THE SCOPE OF THE PROJECT. WHAT PRIMARILY WAS THERE WAS A QUANTITY ERROR IN THE ASPHALT PAVING AREA. SO THE ASPHALT QUANTITIES WERE HIGHER ON THE ASPHALT IN THE BASE CONSIDERATION IN THE BID FOR THEM WAS ACTUALLY GOING TO BE NEEDED SO IT WAS PRIMARILY ERROR ON THE CONSULTANTS PART AND AS WE WENT BACK THROUGH AND LOOKED AT IT BUT IDENTIFIED IT SO WE WERE ABLE TO TRIM THE COST DOWN. GOOD FOR YOU.

QUESTIONS ON THE DISTORTED WAY THIS IS ABOUT STRAP ON THAT ROAD EVERY MORNING I GUESS THE POWER COMPANY WILL BE ALL RIGHT AND THE TRAFFIC YOU KNOW THIS ALL NIGHT WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO FOR TWO WEEKS WITH ALL TRAFFIC BECAUSE THE SCHOOL HAS BEEN NOTIFIED ONE OF THE THINGS WE'LL DO IS HAVE A PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING WITH ALL THE STAKEHOLDERS SO.

THE DETOUR ROUTE HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED HOWEVER THE CONTRACTOR WILL SUBMIT FINAL DETOUR AROUND AND ALL THE STAKEHOLDERS AND PARTIES WILL HAVE TO AGREE ON BOTH ON THE ROUTE AND THE TIMING OF THAT HAPPENS SO BLOCKED IN MIDDLE ALLOWING PUBLIC TRAFFIC DOWN THAT ROAD AND ROAD BECAUSE I WOULD THINK THAT'S YOUR DETOUR FOR THEY'LL HAVE TO THEY'LL HAVE TO I MUST TELL YOU THE BUNKER. OH YEAH.

[XI.7. Approval to Authorize a Construction Contract to The Greenery Inc. for the Law Enforcement Center Challenge Course (Fiscal Impact: $98,605.02) - Patrick Rooney, Manager of Capital Improvements Program]

OKAY. THERE YOU GO. ANY OTHER.

ALL IN FAVOR OF STATEMENT SAYING I OPPOSED UNANIMOUS THE GREENERY NUMBER SEVEN I CONSTRUCTION TRYING TO CONTRACT THE GREENERY FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT CHALLENGE COURSE OKAY A LITTLE BACKGROUND ON THE ON THE PROJECT ON THE LAW ENFORCEMENT CENTER.

SO JUST A FEW PROJECTS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED IN FISCAL YEAR 22 AT THE LAW ENFORCEMENT CENTER WE'VE HAD SOME PARKING AND SERVICE EXTENSION PROJECTS ITEM IN PARKING THERE COVERED COVERED STORAGE AND CARPORTS THAT WE SEE NEW FLOORING AS WELL AS THE REFLECTION PROCESS THAT'S CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION. THIS IS JUST AN ILLUSTRATION OF THE MASTER PLAN THAT WAS APPROVED FOR BUCKWALTER AS YOU CAN THERE THE LLC IS LISTED THERE IS TO FUTURE DEVELOPMENT BUILDINGS TO THE EAST AND TO THE NORTH OF THE LLC AS WELL AS THE EVERGREEN PARK THAT WAS RECENTLY PURCHASED ON THE TOWN .

THE LOCATION OF THE PROJECT IS TO THE WEST OF THE LLC. THE SCOPE FOR THE FOR THE PROJECT IS THE AREA TO BE IMPACT IS APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET BY 150 FEET.

CLEARING AND GRUBBING IS GOING TO BE PROVIDED UNDER A SEPARATE CONTRACT THE WORKING SURFACE WHEN EVERYTHING'S SAID AND DONE IS GOING TO BE SOD NO DRAINAGE SYSTEM AS EVERYTHING'S GOING BE INFILTRATION SHEET FLOW THERE'S NO IMPERVIOUS IS GOING TO BE ADDED FOR THE PROJECT WE ANTICIPATE THE DURATION TO BE AROUND 60 DAYS AND ONCE THE AREA IS COMPLETED IT WILL CLOSED FOR A FENCE THAT MATCHES THE CURRENT LLC FENCING AS WELL AS COLUMNS THAT MATCH THE CURRENT AND WE SEE COLUMNS THIS IS JUST AN EXAMPLE OF THE COLUMNS THAT ARE CURRENTLY A DAILY SEE TODAY IN THOSE WILL ALSO BE PART OF THE PROJECT AS WELL AS THE FENCING AND THIS IS JUST AN ILLUSTRATION FOR THE TYPE OF EQUIPMENT TYPE OF ACTIVITIES THAT WOULD BE OCCURRING ON THE CHANNEL OF COURSE IN SUMMARY THE PROJECT WILL SERVE AS A PLACE

[02:20:03]

FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT PERSONNEL PRIMARILY TO TRAIN FROM POLICE ACADEMY AS WELL AS MAINTAIN THE READY READINESS. AS I MENTIONED BEFORE, SOME CONSIST OF BRICK COLUMNS FENCING, GATE ACCESS, LIGHTING AND THE ELEMENTS FOR THE FOR THE CHALLENGE COURSE WILL BE PROVIDED ON THE POLICE DEPARTMENT BUDGET QUESTION IF 60 DAYS ON BOTH DO YOU HAVE THE START TIME ON THOSE OR WILL YOU GET THAT TO US? WE'LL GET THAT WITHIN THE NEXT 90. YES. YES, MA'AM.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS THERE A MOTION HAVE THE MEDIA SO I HAVE NOT A PATIENT FOR THE TOWN MANAGER PROBABLY AN OBSERVER. NO I'M NOT JUST BRINGING UP THE MOTION I APOLOGIZE FOR THE TOWN MANAGER WHO ENTERED INTO THE AGREEMENT WITH THE GREENERY COVERING THE SITE DEVELOPMENT OF THE CHALLENGE COURSE ALONGSIDE THE CENTER THIS INCLUDES A COMMITMENT FROM THE TOWN OF BLUFFTON FOR $98,605.02 AND I CAN TEN THAT CONTINGENTLY CONTINGENCY WOULD BE PAID FROM THE APPROPRIATE TOWNHOMES SO THE FIRST THING ANY DISCUSSION THIS IS YOUR FIRST TIME AND YOU ACTUALLY PUT A LOT OF MONEY IN RIGHT PRESENT YOUR MONEY LET ME GIVING THE $0.02 I WANT TO GO OVER THAT TAXES I UNDERSTAND YOU'RE SAYING IT'S GOOD TO HEAR GOOD.

THANK YOU, CONGRESSMAN. NO GOOD DAY. OH, YOU'RE FINE WAIT A MINUTE TO GET ALL THE DATA THING ON THIS AND YOU GET THE NEXT BIT OF THE PERSON IS ACTUALLY THE PROJECT MANAGER GOOD BUT YOU DO A GREAT JOB. YES, SIR.

THANK YOU. AND ARE YOU STILL ASKING COUNCIL? NO. NO. OKAY.

WELL THAT'S PRETTY COOL HOW HARD WORKER OKAY THANK YOU. I WAS SORRY I NUMBER EIGHT

[XI.8. Consideration of Approval of an Amendment to the Master Plan for Cypress Ridge within the Jones Estate Planned Unit Development for Additional Roads and Service Lanes to the Commercial Village area of Mill Creek for Future Development of 29 Attached Residential Units on Approximately 1,412 Acres Located on SC Highway 170 - Kevin Icard, Director of Growth Management]

CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE MASTER PLAN FOR CYPRESS RIDGE WITHIN THE JOHN'S ESTATE PLANNING UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR ADDITIONAL ROADS AND SERVICE TO THE COMMERCIAL VILLAGE AREA MILL CREEK FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF 29 ATTACHED RESIDENTIAL UNITS ON APPROXIMATELY 1412 ACRES LOCATED ON SOUTH CAROLINA HIGHWAY 170 FAMILY FAMILY THIS TABLE THIS WE'RE BACK COMING BACK TO TELL US WHAT HAPPENED SURE THING JUST AS A REFRESHER FROM THE COMMISSION MADE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE 1994 REQUEST AS BASED ON THE REVIEW CRITERIA THAT RECOMMENDED THAT REPORT THIS CAME IN FRONT OF YOU AT THE SEPTEMBER MEETING WHERE YOU MADE A MOTION TABLE OF THE REQUESTS TO MAKE SURE THAT THE DEVELOPER, THE COMMUNITY HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO MEET AND STAFF BEING PRESENT AT THAT WAS HELD ON OCTOBER 12TH D.R. HORTON AND THE OF THE COMMUNITY WERE PRESENT PROVIDED A BACKGROUND INFORMATION JONES STATE PD INCLUDING HISTORICAL AERIAL MAPS APPROVED FOR PREVIOUSLY APPROVED VERSIONS OF CYPRESS RIDGE AND POSSIBLE SCENARIOS OF DEVELOPMENT IN THE AREA IN QUESTION.

SO THERE WERE NUMEROUS RESIDENTS THAT WERE IN ATTENDANCE AT THAT MEETING AND THERE WAS A LOT OF CONCERNS ABOUT THE AMOUNT OF TRAFFIC THAT WOULD BE CUT THROUGH TRAFFIC OF THIS NEWLY PROPOSED PORTION OF INTERSTATE WOODEN WHEEL LANE OVERALL BOULEVARD AND LAKERS BOULEVARD AND FELT THAT IT WAS NOT APPROPRIATE AT THIS TIME THERE BEING NO ADDITIONAL CHANGES TO PROPOSED MASTER PLAN FROM THE APPLICANT AGAIN REVIEW CRITERIA WERE PROVIDED TO THE STAFF REPORT. THESE FOUR LISTED WERE THE ONES THAT STAFF HAD CONCERNS WITH THAT DID NOT MEET YOUR ACTIONS ARE TO THE APPLICATION AS SUBMITTED APPROVAL CONDITIONS OR TO DENY THE AGAIN THIS WAS TABLED AND WE ARE HERE THIS EVENING FOR YOUR RECOMMENDATION I AM AVAILABLE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS COUNCILMAN WOOD WAS PRESENT AT THAT MEETING.

HE HEARD A LOT OF CONCERNS SO THE RESIDENT AND THE APPLICANT HERE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS QUESTIONS YOU SOMETHING OUT OF THE MEETING WENT WELL IF YOU WERE ON OPPOSITE SIDES OF EACH OTHER I THINK THE CITIZENS THAT WERE THERE WERE ASKING A LOT FROM THE DEVELOPER.

IT WAS CORDIAL. THE DEVELOPER TRYING TO I FELT COMPROMISE IN SOME WAYS I DON'T THINK ANYBODY EVER CAME TO A CONCLUSION THAT WAS AGREEABLE OR CAN BE COMFORTABLE.

LET ME JUST QUESTIONS FIRST JUST REMEMBER THE QUESTIONS YOU'RE GOING TO ANSWER ANYTHING FROM THIS BUT THERE WAS A REALLY THOROUGH EMAIL THAT WAS SENT A REPLY I THANK THE PERSON THAT BROUGHT UP SOME QUESTIONS I EVEN HAD ABOUT THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND I

[02:25:01]

KNOW COUNCIL IS NOT HAPPY ABOUT THIS RESIDENTIAL WHICH IS OUT OF OUR HANDS BUT THE EMAIL BROUGHT UP AND I WENT BACK AND LOOK AT THE AGREEMENT ABOUT AND ROADWAYS THAT IS A NO NO IN THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT SO THAT'S REALLY YOU KNOW IF IT CAN CUT OUT MORE HOUSES THAN FOR LESS HOUSES THEN WE HAD TO DEAL WITH. SO MY PERSONAL IS TO JUST LET THEM DEAL WITH WHAT THEY AND FOLLOW THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S RECOMMENDATION AND I KNOW A LOT OF PEOPLE EVERYTHING BUT I JUST HATE IT. THE WHOLE COMMUNITY WAS BUILT AROUND A MIXED USE KIND OF LITTLE VILLAGE AND NOW WE'RE SEEING RESIDENTIAL SO EXCITING AND THEY CAN'T SELL COMMERCIAL BUT IT IS GOING TO TURN ONE DAY AND THE COMMERCIAL GOING TO COME AND NOT FOLLOW THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT IN THE MASTER PLAN.

IT'S JUST FRUSTRATING FOR US TO HAVE TO LOOK AT OUR SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD AND SAY WE'RE SORRY THERE'S NOTHING WE CAN DO . IT'S THIS CONVERSION THING SO IT REALLY ONE QUESTION IT WAS MORE I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE THEY READ THAT EMAIL DO YOU WANT TO ANSWER THE QUESTION SO YOU CAN MAKE SURE WHAT I JUST WANTED TO SAY I THINK IT WAS A GOOD CONVERSATION. I THINK WE MIGHT USE THE THUMBS UP AND SO THE REALLY GOOD THINGS I THINK THE RESIDENTS WANT NUMBER ONE NO COMMERCIAL. NUMBER TWO NO CUT THROUGH THE ROAD. NUMBER THREE, NO HOMES ON DELTA BOULEVARD AND REALLY TO CUT THROUGH WHAT WE'RE HERE FOR. SO THAT ONE WAS REALLY OFF THE TABLE.

WE WERE ABLE TO GET IT SO THAT ALL UNITS WOULD ON THE CUT FOR ROAD OR FACING A BARREL OR IF WE JUST HAD A ROAD CONNECTION GO THROUGH BUT OTHERWISE THERE'S NO POINT IN THE LAND PLANNING AMENDMENT IF WE DON'T DO THAT I HAVE TO REGRET IT BECAUSE BY RIGHT WE CAN DO FRONTLOADED. WE JUST SAW THIS AS AN OPPORTUNITY.

WE CAN'T FILL 29 WITHOUT UTILIZING THE COMMERCIAL PARCELS ARE UP ON THE CORNER.

WE FELT IT WAS A GREAT OPPORTUNITY TO ACTUALLY GIVE KIDS OPEN SPACE BUT AGAIN THERE ARE THERE ARE YOU KNOW SO GOING TO CHANGE ACRES OF COMMERCIAL RIGHTS AND THERE ARE 29 CONVERSIONS TO TOWNHOMES OR 29 THE USE THAT IT CAN BE CONVERTED FROM.

SO EITHER WAY I MEAN THE RESIDENTIAL BUILDERS THEY'RE YOU KNOW 30 TRYING TO JUST CLOSE THE DEVELOPMENT OUT BUT JUST BUILD HOWEVER YOU NEED TO IT WILL MOVE FORWARD FOR PERFECTLY FINE THE BEST BUT WE CERTAINLY WANT TO DO WITH WHAT COUNCIL WANTS TO DO IT WE CLARIFIED WHAT DEEDED OVER TO THE OWNERS CABIN SO IS THAT IS THAT WHAT YOU MEAN SO.