7. DISCUSSION OF AN ORDINANCE THAT ACCEPTS THE TRANSFER OF THE CONDUCT OF MUNICIPAL ELECTIONS FROM THE CITY OF BEAUFORT TO THE BOARD OF VOTER REGISTRATION AND ELECTIONS OF BEAUFORT COUNTY.

[7. DISCUSSION OF AN ORDINANCE THAT ACCEPTS THE TRANSFER OF THE CONDUCT OF MUNICIPAL ELECTIONS FROM THE CITY OF BEAUFORT TO THE BOARD OF VOTER REGISTRATION AND ELECTIONS OF BEAUFORT COUNTY.]

ONLY ITEM ON HERE TILL MR. FARNSWORTH MADE A MOTION TO AMEND THE AGENDA.

IS A DISCUSSION OF AN ORDINANCE THAT ACCEPTS THE TRANSFER OF THE CONDUCT OF MUNICIPAL ELECTIONS FROM THE CITY BEAUFORT TO THE BOARD THE VOTER REGISTRATION AND ELECTIONS OF BEAUFORT COUNTY. I WILL MAKE AN EFFORT TO EXPLAIN THIS AND WE HAVE PLENTY OF PEOPLE HERE WHO CAN CORRECT ME AND ADD TO IT IF THEY LIKE. AS MAYOR BEAUFORT IS HERE AND OUR ATTORNEYS ARE HERE TO KEVIN'S HERE FAMILIAR WITH IT. HERE'S HERE'S MY MY BEST UNDERSTANDING OF IT. SOMEWHERE BACK IN THE EARLY YEARS PRIOR TO PRIOR TO NINETEEN NINETY NINE PRIOR TO 1997 ANYWAY THE EACH MUNICIPALITY HAD A MUNICIPAL

[00:05:06]

ELECTION COMMISSION AND AND THEY THEY CONDUCTED THEIR OWN ELECTIONS CERTIFIED THEIR OWN RESULTS AND ETC. ETC. ETC. BUT IN THE LATE 90S IN THE CASE OF BEAUFORT I THINK NINETEEN NINETY NINE NOT JUST BE HILTON HEAD DID THE SAME THING I'M NOT EXACTLY SURE OF THE DATE BUT BEAUFORT ELECTED TO DIVEST ITSELF OF THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR ACTUALLY CONDUCTING THE ELECTIONS THEY WHILE THEY RETAINED AN ELECTION A MUNICIPAL ELECTION COMMISSION THEY DIVESTED THEMSELVES OF THE RESPONSIBILITY OF ACTUALLY CONDUCTING THE ELECTION AND FOR REASONS THAT I DON'T TOTALLY UNDERSTAND. ANY TIME THE IN ANY MUNICIPALITY CHANGES ITS ARRANGEMENT WITH THE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, THE BEAUFORT COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, BEAUFORT COUNTY COUNCIL HAS TO APPROVE IT.

WE DON'T HAVE ANY AUTHORITY TO DO ANYTHING WITH RESPECT TO THE BOARD OF ELECTIONS OR THE MUNICIPALITIES BUT SOMETHING THAT SOMETHING THAT CAME OUT OF THE LEGISLATURE LEGISLATOR GAVE US THAT RESPONSIBILITY SO 2022. NOW THE CITY OF BEAUFORT WISHES TO NOW DIVEST ITSELF OF ITS SOLE REMAINING RESPONSIBILITY WHICH IS THE CERTIFICATION OF THE ELECTION. AND IF YOU THINK ABOUT IT, IT MAKES PERFECT SENSE BECAUSE THE CERTIFICATION OF ELECTION INVOLVES TAKING THE INFORMATION THAT COMES FROM THE BOARD OF ELECTIONS AND SAYING YEP, THAT LOOKS GOOD TO US AND CERTIFYING THE ELECTION.

SO IT'S REALLY IT'S A SUPERFLUOUS PROCESS AT LEAST I THINK IT IS SEEMS TO BE A.

AND APPARENTLY IT APPEARED THAT WAY TO BE THE MAYOR TO THE MAYOR WHO DECIDED TO MOVE THIS ALONG. SO ALL WE'RE DOING TODAY IS WE'RE AGREEING WITH WITH THE CITY OF BEAUFORT WHO I BELIEVE HAS DISBAND THEIR BOARD, THEIR MUNICIPAL WARD OF ELECTIONS.

IS THAT CORRECT? YEAH, YEAH, YEAH, YEAH, YEAH. GOOD AFTERNOON, MR. CHAIR.

WELCOME, SIR. MEMBERS OF COUNTY COUNCIL. GOOD TO SEE ALL MEMBERS OF KIND OF STAFF YOU GREAT SUMMATION. YOU HAVE BEEN MAYOR 19 MONTHS NOW.

RIGHT AFTER BEING ELECTED MAYOR SOME OF YOU MAY RECALL WE HAD A LITTLE ISSUE WITH ONE OF OUR ELECTION COMMISSIONERS AND THOSE OF YOU WHO ARE IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT, ONE OF THE THINGS THAT IS MOST EXCITING TO ME ABOUT GOVERNMENT YOU NEVER KNOW WHAT THE DAY IS GONNA BRING AND AN ELECTION COMMISSION ISSUE IS ONE OF THOSE WHERE WE WENT DOWN A PRETTY DEEP RABBIT HOLE ABOUT ELECTIONS COMMISSION LAWS AND HOW IT'S SORT OF STRUCTURED BETWEEN THE MINUTES COUNTY IN THE COUNTY AND THE STATE ELECTIONS COMMISSION. SO IN THAT SORT OF DISCOVERY PERIOD IN TALKING WITH THE DIRECTOR OF THE ELECTIONS COMMISSION BARRY SMALLS, WE LOOKED AT ALL THE STATE STATUTE AND TO YOUR POINT BACK IN 1999 THE CITY DEFERRED ALL OF THE SORT OF MECHANICS OF AN ELECTION TO THE COUNTY ELECTIONS COMMISSION.

SO THE POLLING PLACES THE STAFFING I MEAN EVERYTHING WITH THE EXCEPTION OF HAVING OUR OWN THREE MEMBER ELECTIONS COMMISSION AND THEN THEM COMING IN AFTER THE ELECTION TO CERTIFY THE VOTE. EVERYTHING ELSE HAS BEEN DEFERRED DIVESTED DUE TO THE COUNTY AND THE ELECTIONS COMMISSION OFFICE MADE A COMMENT THAT IT WAS A LITTLE BIT DUPLICATIVE OF THEM TO HAVE TO CALL THREE MEMBERS OF THE CITY MUNICIPAL WHICH SOMETIMES THAT WAS DIFFICULT. IT'S A SIX YEAR TERM SO WE APPOINT THESE FOLKS WHO ARE VERY EXCITED AND THEN BY MAYBE A YEAR TWO, THREE, FOUR THEY GET A LITTLE LESS INTERESTED.

SO WE'VE GOT COUNTY EMPLOYEE SPENDING A LOT OF TIME CHASING DOWN MUNICIPAL ELECTION COMMISSION MEMBERS TO SIMPLY COME IN AND LOOK AT THE INFORMATION THAT'S BEEN PROVIDED WHICH I THINK IS CREDIBLE AND I THINK OUR COUNTY ELECTIONS OFFICE DOES A GREAT JOB JUST TO SIMPLY CERTIFY THAT VOTE. AND IT WAS SOLD TO ME AT THAT POINT THAT WE COULD ALSO DEFER WE SHOT OUR ELECTIONS COMMISSION DOWN AND SAID THAT ALSO COUNTY STAFF DOESN'T HAVE TO CALL A SEPARATE BODY. THEY DON'T HAVE TO PUBLICLY NOTICE THE ELECTIONS COMMISSION AND WE DON'T HAVE TO HAVE A SEPARATE CERTIFICATION OF VOTE.

SO OUR COUNCIL CITY COUNCIL TALKED ABOUT IT BACK EARLIER IN THE YEAR.

WE HAVE BY ORDINANCE IN MAY WE HAVE COMPLETELY SHUT IT DOWN BECAUSE OUR UNDERSTANDING IS THESE THINGS HAVE TO MOVE IN PARALLEL BETWEEN THE COUNTY AND THE CITY.

SO OUR HOPE IS BECAUSE WE THINK IT MAKES IT A LITTLE EASIER FOR COUNTY STAFF.

IT'S PROBABLY A LITTLE MORE COST EFFICIENT FOR TAXPAYERS AND LESS LESS CUMBERSOME.

BUT IF CHINA DOESN'T WANT TO DEFER IT, WE'RE OK KEEPING OUR ELECTIONS COMMISSION.

WE JUST COME TO SOME RESOLUTION BECAUSE WE DO HAVE AN ELECTION COMING UP IN NOVEMBER.

WE'VE GOT TWO SEATS THAT ARE UP IN NOVEMBER AND SO WE HAVE TO HAVE ELECTIONS COMMISSION TO BE ABLE TO CERTIFY THAT THAT VOTE. AND OBVIOUSLY ORDINANCES TAKE TWO OR THREE READINGS DEPENDING

ON THE RESPECTIVE JURISDICTION . >> THANK YOU, MAYOR MURRAY.

[00:10:03]

TO PUT THIS IN A LITTLE CONTEXT ,THE TOWN OF HILTON HEAD DOUG ITSELF IT'S NOT JUST THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONDUCTING AN ELECTION WHICH ALL THE MUNICIPALITIES HAVE DONE BUT THEY DIVESTED THEMSELVES OF THE RESPONSIBILITY OF CERTIFYING THEIR ELECTION.

MANY YEARS AGO. SO HILTON HEAD HAS BEEN COMPLETELY OUT OF THE PICTURE.

THE ELECTIONS PICTURE FOR A LONG TIME LEAVING BLUFFTON PORT ROYAL AND THE CITY OF BEAUFORT.

IF WE PASS THIS TODAY, THE CITY OF NEWPORT WILL JOIN HILTON HEAD IN NOT HAVING ANY RESPONSE OF ANY ADDITIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES FOR ELECTIONS. I WILL ADD THAT FOR FOR SOME REASON THE TOWN OF PORT ROYAL AND BLUFFTON RETAIN THE OBLIGATION AND THE RIGHT TO CERTIFY THE ELECTION. NOW THAT MAY OR MAY NOT CHANGE. I CAN'T SPEAK FOR PORT ROYAL.

NOR CAN I SPEAK FOR BLUFFTON. BUT I CAN SAY THAT OUR LEGISLATURE MADE AN EFFORT I BELIEVE IN THE 21 IN THE 21 SESSION THEY MAY BE IN THIS YEAR BUT I THINK IT WAS TWENTY ONE SESSION TO PASS A A STATE STATUTE MAKING THESE CHANGES, MANDATING THESE CHANGE COMPLETELY TAKING AWAY ANY ELECTION RESPONSIBILITY FROM ANY MUNICIPALITIES.

BUT THAT HAS NOT HAPPENED. VERY SMALL SEEMS TO THINK IT MAY COME UP AGAIN IN THE NEXT LEGISLATIVE SESSION SESSION. I DON'T KNOW. BUT FOR NOW IF WE PASS THIS TODAY ALL WE'RE DOING IS RELIEVING THE CITY OF BEAUFORT FROM RESPONSIBILITY TO QUOTE UNQUOTE CERTIFY THE ELECTION WHICH MEANS THEY HAVE TO CONTINUE TO APPOINT A MUNICIPAL ELECTION WHICH IS WHICH IS A CUMBERSOME PROCESS AND DOESN'T REALLY ACCOMPLISH ANYTHING AT LEAST IT DOES. SO I WILL ASK FOR A MOTION TO APPROVE.

ITEM NUMBER SEVEN ON THE AGENDA SOLUTIONS. JIM MR. GLOVER MAKES THE MOTION

TO HAVE A SECOND FROM THE SECOND MR. CHAIRMAN. >> MISS.

OK. THANK YOU, MISS HOWARD. ANY COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS FROM MEMBERS OF COUNCIL BEFORE WE VOTE ON THIS QUESTION? YES, SIR.

DOROTHY, THE EQUIPMENT USED IN THE VOTING IS THAT ALL EQUIPMENT THAT IS MAINTAINED AND DELIVERED AND THEN IS BROUGHT BACK TO THE COUNTY FOR YOUR STORY IS THAT THIS CITY HAS ITS OWN VOTING MACHINES. SO THAT'S A GREAT QUESTION, KATHLEEN MCGOWAN.

WE THE CITY OWNS NO VOTING EQUIPMENT. WE DON'T HANDLE ANY PRECINCTS.

WE DON'T HANDLE ANY MARKETING OF OF ELECTIONS. >> EVERYTHING HAS BEEN DEFERRED TO THE COUNTY ELECTIONS COMMISSION. I MEANT TO SAY IN MY PREVIOUS COMMENT THERE'S ALSO NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE COUNTY. WE DO GET A BILL, WE GET AN INVOICE FROM THE ELECTIONS COMMISSION AFTER THE ELECTION BOOTHS FOR WHATEVER MUNICIPAL SHARE OF CONDUCTING THE THE ELECTION IS AN APP THAT WOULDN'T CHANGE EVEN WITH THE DEFERRAL OF THE COMMISSION. YOU'LL STILL INVOICE THE CITY. WE'LL STILL PAY FOR WHATEVER THE ACTUAL COST IS. BUT WE DON'T. WE DON'T MAINTAIN ANY EQUIPMENT OR ANY FACILITIES TO MAKE MAKE ELECTIONS HAPPEN. WHAT WOULD FOLLOW UP MEMORY IS YOU KNOW, IF THE COUNTY ELECTION THE VOTER REGISTRATION PEOPLE WEIGHED IN ON THIS AND THEY HAVE NO OBJECTION WITH TRANSFER POWER. THAT'S ANOTHER GREAT QUESTION.

YES, SIR, THEY HAVE. AND MY UNDERSTANDING IS THE ELECTIONS COMMISSION BOARD HAS VOTED IN FAVOR OF THIS. THAT WAS A REQUIRED STEP TO BRING IT TO THE COUNTY COUNCIL.

SO BOTH OF YOU FOR CITY COUNCIL AND BEAR COUNTY ELECTIONS COMMISSION HAVE A PERMANENT VOTE IN SUPPORT OF THIS MOVE. NOT ONLY DID THEY ENCOURAGE IT. THEY OCCURRED.

AND I THINK TO YOUR POINT THERE'S TWO HUNDRED AND SEVENTY FOUR MINUTES OF HOUSES ACROSS SOUTH CAROLINA GIVEN THE CONTROVERSY AROUND ELECTION LAWS AND RULES AND MAKING SURE THAT ELECTIONS ARE PERFORMED IN A VERY RESPONSIBLE WAY. THE BILL IS PENDING AGAIN IN THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY THIS UPCOMING SESSION. SO I THINK THERE WILL PROBABLY BE A STATEWIDE MANDATE DOING AWAY WITH MINUTES ELECTION COMMISSIONS AND ALSO MANDATING THAT CIVIL ELECTIONS OCCUR IN LINE WITH GENERAL ELECTIONS. LIKE MOST OF THE COUNTIES AND NATIONAL NATIONAL EXIT IT'S JUST A MATTER A MATTER OF TIME BECAUSE BOTH HILTON HEAD AND BEAUFORT WE HAVE OUR ELECTIONS WITH THE GENERAL ELECTIONS BLUFFTON PORT ROYAL HAVE OFF CYCLE SORT HERE. MIDDLE OF THE YEAR ELECTIONS. MAYOR MURRAY MENTIONED SOMETHING SHOOTER MENTIONED AND THAT IS THAT ALL THE MUNICIPALITIES WHETHER THEY RETAIN THE RIGHT TO CERTIFY ELECTIONS OR EVEN IF THEY WILL NOT IF THEY RETAIN THE RIGHT TO ACTUAL CONDUCT ACTUALLY CONDUCT THE ELECTIONS BUT THEY ALL PAY FOR THE ELECTIONS.

>> BEAUFORT IS NOT UNIQUE. ALL MUNICIPALITIES PAY FOR THE ELECTION.

THEY PAY THE COUNTY ELECTIONS COMMISSION FOR ANY AND ALL AND IT'S PRETTY BROAD ANY AND ALL EXPENSES RELATED TO THE CONDUCT OF THE ELECTION. SO THIS HAS BEEN GOING ON SINCE SINCE BACK IN THE 1990S WHEN WHEN THE SOME OF THE MUNICIPALITIES BEGAN DIVESTING

[00:15:02]

THEMSELVES OF THE RESPONSIVE DID ACTUALLY CONDUCT THE ELECTIONS.

SO THANK YOU MAYOR MURRAY AND MR. CHAIRMAN. THANK YOU, MAYOR.

I HAVE NO FURTHER QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. ANYBODY ELSE HERE ANY MORE FURTHER QUESTIONS? I'LL CALL THE QUESTIONS. CALL A QUESTION.

SARAH, YOU WANT TO. WELL, LET ME TRY. LET ME TRY IT WITHOUT.

WITHOUT EXCEPTION WE CAN APPROVE THIS WITHOUT EXCEPTION. ARE THERE ANY EXCEPTIONS HEARING NONE. ITEM SEVEN HAS BEEN APPROVED WHICH MOVES US TO NUMBER EIGHT.

AND I'M GOING TO ASK MR. PASSIVE PESSIMIST TO REPEAT THAT AMENDED MOTION.

YES, I WILL MAKE THE MOTION TO AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE TO FORWARD TO COUNTY COUNCIL FOR THE FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE TO SET THE SALARIES FOR THE COUNTY COUNCIL BASED ON AMENDING SECTION 2 DASH. TWENTY EIGHT OF OUR CURRENT ORDINANCE. THANK YOU. AND DO I HAVE A SECOND ON THAT MOTION? I'LL SECOND AS THE CHAIRMAN MCKELLEN SECONDS.

OK, ANY DISCUSSION QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM MEMBERS COUNCIL? I SEE OUR ADMINISTRATOR LOOKS

LIKE HE WANTS TO PINE OR PINE AWAY. >> MR. ADMINISTRATOR, I JUST NEED THE COMMITTEE TO CONSIDER WHETHER OR NOT YOU WOULD ALSO WANT TO ADD.

WE HAVE NOT DONE IT IN SEVERAL YEARS. ADD A SALARY REVIEW FOR ALL OTHER ELECTED OFFICIALS AS WELL TO MAKE SURE WE'RE PAYING THEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH WHAT THE MARKET IS PAYING. SO IF YOU ALL RECOMMEND THAT OUT TODAY AS A PART OF THE US AND AMEND THE CURRENT MOTION TO ADD THAT THEN WE CAN HAVE AN ORDINANCE PREPARED IN ABOUT A MONTH AND BRING THAT STRAIGHT TO COUNCIL FOR CONSIDERATION FOR FIRST SECOND THIRD READING.

ARE YOU RECOMMENDING AN ANNUAL REVIEW OR NOT JUST RECOMMENDING THAT WE REVIEW AND AMEND THE SALARY CHART THAT'S CURRENTLY IN THE COUNTY CODE FOR ELECTED OFFICIALS ONE TIME.

>> YEAH. IT WOULD IT WOULD IT WOULD UP GROUP LIKE WE DID THE COMMON US WITH COUNTY POSITIONS WE WOULD DO THAT FOR THE ELECTED OFFICIAL AS TREASURER AUDITOR OR COURT CORONER. SHERIFF TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE PAYING THEM AT WHAT THE MARKET THEN WHAT OTHER COUNTIES OUR SIZE ARE PAYING THEIR ELECTED OFFICIALS.

ALL OTHER CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICE? THAT'S CORRECT.

YES. STEUBEN I DO NOT SUPPORT THE MOTION IS ON THE FLOOR AT THIS TIME BUT I WOULD OFFER AMENDMENT TO INCLUDE ALL ELECTED CONSTITUTIONAL EMPLOYEES AS PART OF THE STUDY AND I WOULD SUPPORT THAT MOTION.

SO I JUST FINISHED AS AN AMENDMENT. >> THANK YOU, RICHARD GLOVER.

MR. GLOVER HAS MADE A MOTION TO AMEND MR. PASS AMOUNTS MOTION TO INCLUDE ALL CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS IN THE REVIEW WHICH WILL TAKE PLACE. I DON'T KNOW WHERE DOES THIS TAKE PLACE, JOE, BETWEEN NOW AND JANUARY 1ST? YES, SIR.

IT DOES. OK. IT REQUIRES THREE READINGS AND A PUBLIC HEARING TO HAVE THIS AND ACTED BEFORE IT TAKES PLACE.

THAT'S WHY IT IS TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE. OK.

>> WELL, THERE IS A THERE'S AN AMENDMENT ON THE FLOOR THAT HASN'T BEEN SECONDED YET TO ADD ALL CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS TO IT. DO YOU HAVE SECOND ALICE? IS THAT A SECOND? YES. YES.

RIGHT. WE'RE NOW IN DISCUSSION ON THE ON THE AMENDMENT.

MR. GLOVER'S AMENDMENT TO MR. PARSIMONIOUS MOTION ANY COMMENTS OR DISCUSSION ON MR. GLOVER'S AMENDMENT TO ADD TO CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS HEARING NONE.

WITHOUT EXCEPTION, WE WILL ADOPT MYSTERY. MR. GLOVER'S AMENDMENT TO MR. PARSONS MOTION NOW OR BACK TO THE MAIN MOTION COMMENTS ABOUT REGARDING THE MOTION ITSELF.

YOU ONLY COME IN I ONLY COME IN. I HAVE WHAT WAS THAT? THESE WILL ACTUALLY HAVE TO BE TWO SEPARATE ORDINANCES BECAUSE THE ELECTED OFFICIALS ARE

TREATED SOMEWHAT DIFFERENTLY THAN COUNCIL MEMBERS. >> SO I WILL CERTAINLY WORK WITH ADMINISTRATION AND OUR ATTORNEY BECAUSE WE DO HAVE AN ORDINANCE THAT TALKS ABOUT THE ELECTED OFFICIALS AND AN ORDINANCE THAT TALKS ABOUT COUNTY COUNCIL.

>> BUT WE SHOULD HAVE BOTH OF THEM LOOKED AT. SO I AM VERY HAPPY THAT WE

[00:20:03]

WOULD MOVE FORWARD IN THAT REGARD. >> THANK.

THANK YOU, MR. MACALLAN. DID YOU HAVE SOMETHING YOU WANTED? I WAS JUST GOING TO ASK JARED JUST BACK A LITTLE BIT MORE IN-DEPTH ABOUT WHAT HE'S TRYING TO ACCOMPLISH HERE. I'M NOT SURE THAT IT'S ACTUALLY A ADJUSTMENT TO THE BASE SALARY WE ESTABLISHED THROUGH 2020 BUT RATHER TO CLEAR UP AMENDMENTS THAT APPEARED IN THAT ORDINANCE THAT WE TRYING TO RECONSIDER. WITH REGARD TO OTHER TYPES OF PAYMENTS, I DON'T THINK THIS IS A MOTION TO INCREASE THE BASE SALARY AS MUCH AS IT IS TO CLEAN UP THE ORDINANCE AT WE

ASKED IN JUNE OF 2012 PAST ME. >> DO YOU WANT TO COMMENT ON THAT? OH YES. WE WILL TAKE A LOOK AT THE ORDINANCE ITSELF BECAUSE THERE ARE SOME SOME THINGS IN THERE THAT WE HAVE TO CLARIFY AND WE'LL WORK WITH ADMINISTRATION AND OUR ATTORNEY TO ENSURE THAT EVERYTHING IS DONE CORRECTLY UNDER THE LAW AND WE'LL ALL HAVE SOME SUGGESTED LANGUAGE CHANGES. OK.

>> ANY ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ON THE MAIN MOTION? ITEM NUMBER EIGHT THAT WERE THAT'S UNDER DISCUSSION RIGHT NOW HERE NO ADDITIONAL COMMENTS .

I THINK MR. GLOVER SAID HE WANTED TO VOTE AGAINST THIS. IS THAT CORRECT? MR. GLOVER? NO, NO, NO. AND THAT THE AMENDED AS AMENDED AS AMENDED. I'M SUPPORTING THE. OH, YOU'RE OK.

OK. SO GIVEN THAT I'LL SAY WITHOUT EXCEPTION THIS THIS.

ARE THERE ANY EXCEPTIONS FOR APPROVAL NOW ITEM NUMBER EIGHT ON THE AGENDA HERE? NONE. ITEM NUMBER EIGHT IS APPROVED AND AS AMENDED NOW WE HAVE TO TAKE A VOTE ON THE COMPLETE PACKAGE WITH THE AMENDMENT THAT WAS THAT WAS IT.

THAT WAS IT. THAT WAS IT. YEAH.

OKAY. ALL RIGHT. SO THIS BRINGS US TO THE FINAL ITEM ON THE AGENDA WHICH IS ADJOURNMENT. THANK YOU.

WHERE BEFORE WE GO? WHO'S WHO'S ALICE? NO, LARRY.

LARRY SET UP FOR EXACTLY 2 O'CLOCK OR AS SOON AS THIS MY MEETING'S OVER.

WELL, THE ISSUE IS IF OUR FIRST SPEAKER IS HERE. I'M AGREEABLE TO STARTING IT SOONER BUT I DON'T KNOW. THE ANNOUNCEMENT WAS AS SOON AS SHE WAS FINISHED.

I HAVE TO CHECK WITH SARA ON THAT. SARAH KNOW IF OUR FIRST SPEAKER

WAS SURE SARAH WAS GOING LIKE THIS? >> LARRY, JUST YOU KNOW,

THINKING THAT. >> I CAN'T. >> FIRST SPEAKER IS NOT HERE AND NOT PART HAS THE MEETING TO START AT 10:00 P.M. WE DID NOT SAY OR AT THE CONCLUSION OF O'CLOCK. JUST IT GOING TO BE ABOUT I WOULD TAKE 30 MINUTES ALONE WITH RUSH. THAT'S WHAT WE SAW RIGHT AT THE END THE BY THE NEXT MEETING WE'LL START AT APPROPRIATE TO RESPECT MR. MCCALLUM, IS THAT CORRECT?

>> AND WE CAN USE THE CLAIMS STATION. YES, SIR.

SORRY. REPEAT THE QUESTION. >> WE'LL USE THE SAME ZOOM NO ASIANS DEPEND MEETINGS THAT THE FOLLOWING? YES, OURS THE SAME LENGTH.

OK, SO WE CAN LEAVE THE MEETING AND COME BACK. ALL RIGHT.

YES, MA'AM. THANK YOU. HI.

WE WERE DISMISSED. >>

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.

Aug 15, 2022 Executive Committee

Link

Social

Embed

Download

Download Selected Item