[00:00:06]
SO I'D LIKE TO GO AHEAD AND FALL THIS MEETING OF THE POLICY COMMITTEE.
UM, I CALL IT TO ORDER BEFORE WE MAY BEGIN.
UM, WE ARE DOING THIS HYBRID, SO THERE ARE PEOPLE PARTICIPATING ONLINE AND IN PERSON.
SO I'D LIKE TO IDENTIFY WHO IS IN THE ROOM AT THIS TIME.
SO WE HAVE, UM, ROBIN AND MOLLY ARE HERE HELPING US GET ALL SET UP TECHNOLOGY, UH, WEDNESDAY CARTLIDGE DR.
BLOGS, ROBERT ODDEN BY MYSELF AND ONLINE.
THE BOARD MEMBERS THAT WE HAVE ARE KATHY ROBOT, BELL CAMPBELL, DAVID
I SEE HIM RIGHT AT THE BOTTOM.
AND, UM, OKAY, SO JUST LET'S DO A SOUND CHECK.
CAN EVERYBODY ON THE LINE HEAR US IF YOU COULD JUST THUMBS UP OR SOMETHING.
OKAY, SO LET'S GO AHEAD AND BEGIN.
UM, AS IS OUR CUSTOM LIKE STAND FOR THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE BLADDER AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS ONE, UH, INDIFFERENCE, LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL.
THE FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS IS TO APPROVE THE AGENDA.
SO CATHY OR RACHEL, WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE AGENDA.
UH, I MOVE, WE APPROVE THE AGENDA.
UM, WE DO HAVE SOME MEMBERS IN THE AUDIENCE FOR PUBLIC CONDUCT, SO WE WILL GO TO PUBLIC COMMENT ALREADY.
SO, UM, AS SOME OF THE PUBLIC COMMENTERS ARE FILLING OUT THE PAPERS OR JUST GOING TO GO AHEAD AND LET'S MOVE ON WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE JULY 7TH VIDEO MEETING MINUTES.
I MOVE, WE APPROVE THE JULY 7TH COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES.
I'LL SECOND AND ASK JUST FOR ONE MOMENT.
I'M JUST DOUBLE CHECKING IT REAL QUICK.
THAT WAS JUST ONE THING I WANTED TO CHECK.
YOU SEE IT? WANT ME TO KEEP STOP SPRAWLING? OH, OKAY.
ALL IN FAVOR OF APPROVING THE JULY 7TH COMMITTEE SAY AYE.
SO, UM, MR. EARL CAMPBELL HAS JOINED US ONLINE AND DR.
CANDACE BROODER HAS JOINED US IN HOUSE.
SO LET'S GO BACK TO PUBLIC COMMENT.
BUT THEY DON'T, THEY'RE NOT RIGHT.
WE JUST HAVE ONE PUBLIC COMMENT.
SO FIRST ONE, CHRISTINE ALEXANDER.
I THINK WE CAN HEAR YOU FROM THERE UNLESS YOU WANT TO COME FORWARD.
UM, AS YOU SAY, MY NAME IS PRESTON ALEXANDER AND, UM, MY, I DON'T HAVE AN ISSUE, BUT I THINK IF WE'RE GOING TO TALK
[00:05:01]
ABOUT NASCAR GOING TO TALK ABOUT THE LOCALS, THEN I THINK THEY MAY BE A LITTLE BIT OF FUSION ABOUT THE TWO.I THINK THE MASCOT, WHICH IS PROUDLY DISPLAYED ALL AROUND SCHOOL AND STUFF, AND I'M NOT EXACTLY SURE WHAT THE MASCOT IS.
WHAT'S ON THE FEED OR IT'S JUST, AND I THINK THAT'S SOMETHING THAT NEEDS TO BE IRONED BECAUSE I THINK THE MASCOT IS SOMETHING THAT SHOWS YOUR PRIDE.
I THINK IF YOU WERE UP THERE CLEAN AND THE MASCOT STARE, AND I THINK WHEN YOU LOOK AT ME, LOOK AT TV, THAT'S WHAT YOU'VE SEEN.
NOW THE LOGO IS A DIFFERENT THING.
YOU KNOW, IF YOU'RE OUT THERE AND YOU'RE THINKING TO HAVE SOMETHING LIKE DIFFERENT, THAT'S LIKE ON A HAT OR WHATEVER, AND I THINK MAYBE DANCE A LOGO.
AND I THINK THAT SHOULD BE THE FONT.
SO THE, THERE IS NO QUESTION IN ANYBODY'S MIND, THIS IS A LOCAL, THIS IS NOT OFFICIAL SCHOOL.
WE AS A TEAM SITE, BECAUSE WE THINK THAT THIS IS GOING TO STAY, YOU KNOW WHAT? THIS IS WHAT WE WANT TO DISPLAY.
I DEFINITELY THINK THAT THERE SHOULD BE DISCUSSION.
SO THERE THERE'S NO ISSUE ABOUT EXACTLY WHAT IT IS IS YOU DON'T HAVE TO TALK.
THIS IS HOW THIS IS AN OFFICIAL PART.
SO THAT'S, I'M REALLY INTERESTED.
WE DON'T HAVE TO SAY THIS IS THE LOGO.
WHEN YOU ALL COME UP HERE, WE GET A MESSAGE SET TO SPEAK UP A LITTLE BIT LOUDER.
WHEN YOU COME UP, SPEAK IT, SPEAK UP THIS LITTLE BIT.
UM, MS. GERALDINE, DOE JOINING US, STEPHANIE ABOUT THE MANAGER THAT CAN HAPPEN.
I SEE ON THE AGENDA, Y'ALL HAVE E O E EIGHT 10, I GUESS THAT'S REFERRING TO, YOU WANT TO CHANGE THAT? IT'S ALREADY THERE ABOUT THE BOARD APPROVING FOR THE MASCOT AND IS THAT WHAT'S ON THE AGENDA? SO WHAT'S THAT? SO THIS IS THE POLICY COMMITTEE.
SO THAT'S ON THE AGENDA IS WE'RE GOING TO BE LOOKING AT OUR THOUGHTS REGARDING NAMING, BUT NO CHANGES.
OH, WE MAY SUGGEST SOME CHANGES TO THE PIRACY.
THAT'S THE PURPOSE OF THE NAVY.
THAT'S WHY I, YOU KNOW, I WANT IT TO GO AFTER SO I CAN UNDERSTAND, YOU KNOW, WHAT WAS THE PURPOSE.
BUT ANYWAY, MY PURPOSE IS THAT WE SAID THAT WE JUST GOING TO CHANGE ONE LOGO, BUT I WAS CONCERNED ABOUT THE FLYING EAGLE BEING ON THE FIELDS.
THAT'S WHAT, THAT WAS OUR REQUEST, THE MASCOT ON THE FIELDS.
UM, I DON'T KNOW WHAT WAS PLACED ON THE BOARD BEFORE, YOU KNOW, THEY GOT IT WHERE THEY CAN TAKE IT DOWN, BUT Y'ALL ALREADY APPROVED THAT THAT'S COMING AND COMING DOWN.
SO THE MAIN ISSUE NOW I KNOW THE MAIN ISSUE IS THE MASCOT ON THE FIELD.
THAT'S THE MAIN, THAT'S THE MAIN ISSUE.
AND ANYWHERE ELSE WE WANT BLIND.
THE ORIGINAL EAGLE THAT WE GRADUATE WITH IN 1970.
AND I THINK THAT Y'ALL HAVE A PICTURE OF THAT.
I FELT LIKE I SAID, AT THE MEETING, IT WAS AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE SCHOOLS AND THE AGREEMENT WAS BROKEN.
AND IT DID NOT COME FROM THE BOARD.
AND IF YOU LOOK AT O E A ONE 10, YOU WILL SEE THE BOARD WAS SUPPOSED TO HAVE, I BELIEVE.
AND THAT'S WHAT YOU ARE LOOKING AT TONIGHT.
SO WE WILL SEE, YOU KNOW, WHAT YOU ALL TALK ABOUT TONIGHT ON HOW YOU'RE GOING TO CHANGE IT, BUT WE WANT TO STAY WITH THE ORIGINAL ONE UNTIL IT'S CHANGED.
[00:10:03]
OKAY.THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR COMING TO THE POLICY COMMITTEE AND AS STATED ON THE AGENDA, THE PURPOSE, THE ENTIRE PURPOSE FOR THIS MEETING TODAY IS TO REVIEW OUR POLICIES, WHICH ARE, UH, GC 3.8 AND OH E EIGHT POINT 10.
SO LET ME JUST SET SOME EXPECTATIONS FOR TODAY'S MEETING.
THIS IS A COMMITTEE COMMITTEES.
COMMITTEES BRING FORWARD RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE FULL BOARD TO DECIDE.
ALSO THIS WILL BE THE FIRST TIME THAT WE WILL BE LOOKING AT THESE PARTICULAR POLICIES.
SO THE PROCESS WILL HAVE TO BE THAT WHATEVER IS DECIDED OR RECOMMENDED HERE TO BRING TO THE FULL BOARD WILL HAVE TO GO TO THE BOARD FOR CONSIDERATION, AND THEN THE BOARD WOULD CONSIDER IT AND IT WOULD HAVE TO THEN HAVE A SUBSEQUENT MEETING, BE VOTED A FINE, UM, AGAIN, OUR PURVIEW IS STRICTLY DEALING WITH POLICY AND ISSUES WITH ALL I SAY, NOT ANY ONE ITEM IN PARTICULAR.
UM, SO THE TWO POLICIES IN QUESTION THAT DEAL WITH NAMING OF MASCOTS, NAMING OF COLORS AND NAMING OF SCHOOLS ARE THE TWO THAT I JUST MENTIONED, WHICH ARE GC THREE AND ONLY EIGHT POINT TAP.
SO I'D LIKE TO OPEN UP THE DISCUSSION WITH DR.
AND THEN OF COURSE, OTHER MEMBERS WHO WANT TO ADD IT AND ASKED IF OVER WHILE YOU WERE PREPARING FOR TODAY'S MEETING, IF YOU HAD ANY THOUGHTS ABOUT GC RATE 0.8, RIGHT.
AND LET ME JUST READ IT ALOUD.
SO THIS ALL STARTS OUT WITH THE BOARD WILL.
SO THAT'S, BEFORE YOU EVEN SEE NUMBER ONE, YOU'RE GOING TO SEE THE BOARD WILL AND THE BOARD WILL RIGHT THERE, ALL THOSE THINGS THAT ARE LISTED BELOW IT.
AND NUMBER EIGHT SAYS THE BOARD WILL NAME NEW FACILITIES BEFORE A FINAL VOTE ON NAMING FACILITIES.
THE BOARD WILL CONTACT LOCAL COMMUNITY LEADERS THROUGH PUBLIC NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING.
SO THAT IS WHAT WE'RE LOOKING AT RIGHT NOW.
SO CATHY, DO YOU HAVE SOME THOUGHTS? I DO.
I THINK THAT ONE OF THE REASONS THAT WE DECIDED TO LOOK AT THESE POLICIES WAS TO BRING THEM INTO ALIGNMENT WITH THE ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS.
SO IF WE LOOK AT ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATION, O S 28, UM, ROMAN NUMERAL NUMBER FOUR, APPOINTMENT OF BOARD NAMING COMMITTEE, IT SAYS IF THE BUILDING A NEW SCHOOL RESULTS IN THE CREATION OF A NEW SCHOOL ATTENDANCE, THE BOARD CHAIR PERSON WILL APPOINT A NAMING COMMITTEE.
AND THEN IT GOES ON TO IDENTIFY WHO WILL BE IN THE NAMING COMMITTEE.
SO IT MAKES SENSE TO ME THAT, TO OUR POLICY, WE WOULD ADD THAT THE BOARD WILL, YOU KNOW, UH, SO NAMING NEW FACILITIES, THE BOARD WILL APPOINT, UM, A NAMING COMMITTEE TO SERVE IN AN ADVISORY CAPACITY.
AND THEN WE COULD LIST THESE THINGS.
OR WE COULD EITHER JUST SAY, UM, AS SPECIFIED IN DISTRICT RESER, UH, REGULATIONS IN, IN AR, UH, 20 AND AR OH, S 28, DR.
RACHEL, DO YOU HAVE ANY THOUGHTS ON THAT? YES, MA'AM.
WE NEED TO TAKE THE TOTALITY OF GC 3.80 E EIGHT POINT 10 AND A R O S 28 INTO CONSIDERATION WHEN WE'RE MODIFYING ANY OF OUR POLICIES.
THE ONLY THING THAT I POTENTIALLY DISAGREE WITH THAT MS. ROBIN STATED WAS, UM, MAKING A REFERENCE TO AN AR IN OUR POLICIES BECAUSE THE ARS COULD ARE CHANGED BY THE DISTRICT OR THE ADMINISTRATION.
AND IT'S NOT NECESSARILY SOMETHING THE ARS ARE SUPPOSED TO BE GUIDED BY THE POLICIES.
SO WE SHOULD REFERENCE THEM, I DON'T THINK NECESSARILY.
WE NEED TO MAKE EVERYTHING COME INTO ALIGNMENT.
UM, I, THAT, THERE'S A BIT OF CONFUSION WHEN YOU DO LOOK AT O E EIGHT POINT 10, UM, BECAUSE UNDERNEATH THE, THE MAIN
[00:15:01]
HEADING WHERE IT DISCUSSES THE NAMING OF FACILITIES, IT THEN REFERENCES AN A OR SUBPART A, UM, THAT'S WHERE THE MASCOTS AND THE COLORS COME IN.SO WE NEED TO MAKE A CLARIFICATION ON IS THAT COMMITTEE TASK WITH THE MASCOTS AND COLORS AND NAMING, UM, BECAUSE IT SAYS THAT IT'S OUR FINAL AUTHORITY.
UM, SO AGAIN, THERE'S SOME CONFUSION, I THINK, WITHIN OUR OWN POLICIES AND THEN MAKING THE ARS AND OUR POLICIES ALIGN.
UM, I AGREE WITH WHAT YOU BOTH HAVE PROVIDED HERE ON MY THOUGHTS ON THIS WORD, THAT THE WOULD LOOK AT THE BOARD POLICIES.
UM, SO ALONG WHAT YOU SAID, RACHEL, IS THAT THE ARS ARE DERIVED FROM BOARD POLICY.
SO, SO, SO I WOULD AGREE THAT WE NEED TO MAKE SURE THAT OUR POLICIES ARE SUCH, AND THEN THE DISTRICT WOULD WORK ON THE AIR TO MAKE SURE THAT IT WAS ALIGNED.
SO I HAD A SUGGESTION FOR SOME WORDING FOR GC 3.8, UM, PROB AND I JUST SENT IT TO YOU IN A WORD DOCUMENT THROUGH YOUR EMAIL.
SO ALONG WITH WHAT KATHY WAS SAYING, AND MAYBE TO YOUR POINT TO RACHEL, I WAS SUGGEST THAT BRIEF GC 3.8 COULD BE, COULD SAY, THE BOARD WILL NAME NEW SCHOOLS, MASCOTS AND COLORS, THE SELECTION OF A NAME MASCOT OR COLORS WILL BE MADE AFTER CONSIDERATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS PROVIDED TO THE BOARD BY A BOARD APPOINTED AD HOC COMMITTEE SERVING IN AN ADVISORY CAPACITY.
SO I KNOW SEE THAT RIGHT THERE.
SO, YEAH, SO I, YOU KNOW, SOMETIMES IT'S EASIER TO WORK ON A WRITTEN DOCUMENT AND INSTEAD OF JUST ALL BEING VERBAL.
UH, RACHEL, WHAT DO YOU THINK I WAS GOING TO SAY IT, THAT SOUNDS, UM, MUCH MORE CLEAR, AND I THINK THAT ADDRESSES THE ISSUE.
UM, A, I THINK THE ONLY CLARIFICATION THAT WE NEED TO MAKE IS THE MAKEUP OF THAT AD HOC COMMITTEE, BECAUSE I KNOW IN THE AR PRESENTLY, IT TALKS ABOUT THE, THE COMPOSITION OF THAT COMMITTEE AND WHO WOULD BE SERVING ON IT.
UM, AND I THINK IT'S EVEN PERHAPS SUPERINTENDENT APPOINTED OR BOARD CHAIR APPOINTED.
SO THOSE ARE THE TWO THINGS THAT WOULD STICK OUT TO ME, BUT I THINK THAT THE BEGINNING OF IT, WHERE WE CLARIFY NAMING MASCOTS IN COLORS IS GREAT.
UM, AND, AND SO RACHEL, TO THAT POINT, I THOUGHT THAT TO GET TOO MUCH INTO THE WEEDS AS TO WHO HAS TO BE ON THAT COMMITTEE, I THOUGHT THAT BY SAYING THAT IT WAS A BOARD APPOINTED AD HOC COMMITTEE, UM, THAT CERTAINLY THEY WOULD INCLUDE, UM, COMMUNITY MEMBERS AND SCHOOL, YOU KNOW, UH, FOR A NEW SCHOOL.
YOU'RE NOT GOING TO HAVE, UH, YOU'RE NOT GOING TO HAVE A PRINCIPAL YOU'RE NOT GOING TO HAVE.
UM, SO ANYWAY, SO I WASN'T SURE ABOUT GETTING SO FAR DOWN INTO THE WEEKS THAT THAT MIGHT BE ADDRESSED IN THE AIR.
I DON'T KNOW, UH, DAVID, YOUR THOUGHTS.
I AGREE WITH WHAT YOU JUST SAID.
I THINK THAT AR CAN ELABORATE ON THE POLICY.
UM, BUT, UM, THE ONLY THING IS, UM, RECENT, WE SAY NAMING NEW SCHOOLS, I THOUGHT WE WERE GOING TO MAKE IT ALL ENCOMPASSING AND JUST SAY NAME SCHOOLS.
ONE OTHER QUESTION IS TO WENDY, IS, IS IT A STATE STATUTE THAT WE NAME SCHOOLS? I THINK IT IS.
I THINK IT'S DERIVED FROM THE STATE STATUTE AND THE STATUTE ABOUT THAT THE BOARD CONTROLS THE EDUCATIONAL INTEREST OF THE, UH, OF THE SCHOOL DISTRICT.
THAT IS EXACTLY HOW TO INTERPRET IT.
WE LOOKED AT SOME OF THE OTHER OBSTACLES INSTEAD, THE STATUTE SAYS THE EDUCATIONAL DISTRICT AND RELATE THEM TO BUY OR SELL.
AND THE MORE HAS THE DUTY TO TAKE CARE OF ALL SCHOOL DISTRICT.
THAT IS YOUR PART OF YOUR STATUTORY.
SO DAVID, TO JUST RESPOND TO YOUR COMMENT, UM, YES, WE, NUMBER EIGHT DOES SAY NEW SCHOOLS, BUT THEN I'M PROPOSING A RECOMMENDATION FOR A NUMBER NINE TO CONSIDER AND DECIDE ON CHANGES TO A SCHOOL'S BASKET OR COLORS AFTER RECEIVING A RECOMMENDATION FROM A COMPLETE COMMITTEE COMPRISED OF REQUESTING SCHOOLS, SIC MEMBERS, STAFF, STUDENTS, AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS.
CAN YOU HEAR ME? EXCUSE ME, CANCER BLACK.
SO, UM, SOME OF THE POINTS HAVE ALREADY BEEN MADE, BUT, YOU KNOW, YES.
ARE THE BOARD POLICY, WHAT IS WHAT DRIVES OUR ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS?
[00:20:01]
AND IF YOU LOST THE DATE ON THE AR IS JUNE OF 2015, BECAUSE WE KNOW OUR GO HERE AND GOVERNANCE MANUAL IS MUCH NEWER THAN THAT.SO THAT'S WHY THERE'S A DISCREPANCY, RIGHT.
UM, I, UH, SO IN TERMS OF, LET'S GO TO, UM, G C3 EIGHT AND, YOU KNOW, I AGREE THAT THAT'S KIND OF, DOESN'T DEFINE NAMING NEW FACILITIES WELL ENOUGH AND IT LEAVES OFF BECAUSE WE'VE ALREADY POINTED OUT THE FOLLOWERS, THE, AND THE MASCOTS.
AND, UM, YOU KNOW, I DON'T THINK BEFORE A FILE AND WHAT IT SAYS RIGHT NOW TO FORM A FINAL VOTE ON NAMING FACILITIES, CONTACT LOCAL COMMUNITY LEADERS, PUBLIC PUBLIC NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING.
AND, UM, SO I THINK YOUR RECOMMENDATION, IF YOU SCROLL BACK TO THAT, ROBIN, WHAT, UM, TRICIA HAS PROPOSED IS MUCH BETTER.
WHAT I SEE AS A PROBLEM, UH, TRICIA IS THAT YOU HAVE A BOARD APPOINTED AN AD HOC COMMITTEE.
AND I THINK THAT HAS TO BE DEFINED, IS IT, IS THAT, UH, A BOARD COMMITTEE, COMMUNITY COMMITTEE WHO DOES THAT COMMITTEE, AND I'M JUST SOMEBODY WHO'S ALREADY SAID THAT THROUGH, I'M KIND OF BORED CAUSE IT DIDN'T PASS AND THEY NEED THE SCHOOLS.
IT WAS A BOARD COMMITTEE AND IT WAS THE BOARD AND THE SCHOOL THAT WAS GOING TO BE IN THAT DISTRICT OR AREA.
IT HAS BEEN THE REPRESENTATIVE OF THAT DISTRICT WHO LED THAT, THAT COMMITTEE AND COMMITTEE WAS MADE OF A THEATER SCHOOL THAT WAS GOING TO, WE'RE TALKING ABOUT TWO SCHOOLS NOW GOING TO THE NEW SCHOOL.
SO I E WHEN MAY RIVER OPENED, IT WAS THE LEFT AND HIGH, AND IT WAS COMMUNITY MEMBERS THAT WERE GOING OVER TO THE FEEDER SCHOOL THAT THE BOARD MEMBER WAS REPRESENT, UM, CHAIR LIKE PRITCHER BILLS, MS. ANDERSON.
UM, WHEN WE RENAMED ME VICTORVILLE RIVER RIDGE, ONE OF THE TWO STORES LIKE THEIR PARENTS, PARENTS, IT WAS THIS, THIS, AND THIS PARTNERS, MANY PARTNERS.
THE PRINCIPAL AT THE THEATER SCHOOL WAS THE ONE WHO REACHED OUT TO THEM.
THEY HAD STUDENTS INVOLVED ON IT.
THEY HAD THIS, THE COMMUNITY BUSINESS PARTNERS, UM, COUNTY COUNCIL COUNCIL, BUT STUDENT COUNCIL STUFF INVOLVED IN IT.
SO THOSE WERE THE PEOPLE THAT COMPRISE THE, THE COMMITTEE.
SO HOW WOULD YOU LOOK
LET'S JUST TALK FOR A SECOND BECAUSE I HAVEN'T BOUGHT IT.
UM, SO, UH, UH, PROVIDED TO THE BOARD BY A BOARD APPOINTED AD HOC, THEY SERVING IN AN ADVISORY CAPACITY.
THEN YOU CAN PUT THAT THE, UH, COMMITTEE, UH, MEMBERS RULE INCLUDE, UM, THE, THE, UH, PROBABLY THE CHAIN OR SHOULD BE THE PERSON THAT REPRESENTS THE GEOGRAPHICAL REGION WHERE THE NEW SCHOOL TO BE.
SO THAT WOULD BE THE CHAIR OF THE AREA INVOLVED.
IT SHOULD BE THE CHAIR AND THEN THE AVATAR.
SO THE SIC IS NOT GOING TO BE THERE YET.
WE'RE TALKING TO JOEL NEW FOOLS, RIGHT.
WHAT IF SO, HOW THEY DID THAT WAS THE STUDENTS THAT WERE GOING OVER THERE.
SO, I MEAN, IT WAS THE PREVIEW, IT WAS THE THEATER SCHOOL AT SIC CHAIR, BUT WERE ALSO LIKE IF IT WAS RISING JUNIORS, THEY HAD A SOPHOMORE CLASS, UH, OR GOING TO BE RISING JUNIORS, ALL BRAND NEW SCHOOL.
THEY GOT THOSE STUDENTS AND THE GRADE LEVEL PEOPLE TO BE ON BECAUSE DADDY, BECAUSE THEY WILL BE THE RYZEN STUDENTS AND TO THE NEW SCHOOL.
SO DO YOU THINK THAT IN POLICY, WE HAVE TO GO TO THIS CITY TO IDENTIFY EXACTLY WHO OR WHEN SUCH AN EVENT FIRST, THIS CONVERSATION WILL HAPPEN AT A BOARD MEETING AS TO WHO WOULD BE
RACHEL, DO YOU HAVE SOME THOUGHTS ON THAT? UM, I HAVE A COUPLE, ONE SUGGESTION WOULD BE JUST TO, UM, ADD THE WORD COMMUNITY IN BETWEEN AD HOC AND COMMITTEE.
SO THAT IT'S CALLED AN AD HOC COMMUNITY COMMITTEE.
THAT KIND OF IMPLIES THAT IT'S GOING TO BE MADE UP OF MORE THAN JUST BOARD MEMBERS.
IT'S GOING TO HAVE COMMUNITY MEMBER, STAKEHOLDERS, THINGS LIKE THAT.
IF WE DON'T WANT TO GET INTO THE WEEDS OF THE COMPOSITION OF IT.
UM, I KNOW THAT THE COMPOSITION OF THE COMMITTEE IS DISCUSSED IN A R O S 28 WHEN IT LISTS OUT ALL THOSE.
UM, BUT I THINK THAT AR, AND OF COURSE THE DISTRICT IS GOING TO GO BACK AFTER WE FINALIZE THIS POLICY AND THEY WILL MASSAGE THE AR
[00:25:01]
TO FIT.UM, BUT THAT ONE ONLY SPEAKS UP THE NAMING OF NEW SCHOOLS THAT DOESN'T TALK ABOUT MASCOTS AND COLORS AND THINGS LIKE THAT.
SO, UM, WHEN IT TALKS ABOUT COMMITTEE MAKEUP, WELL, IT DOES SAY THE SELECTION OF A MASCOT OR COLORS.
WELL, I THINK SHE NEEDS THE AR RIGHT.
RACHEL MEANT THE AR VR DOES SAY IT IN, UM, D UNDERNEATH THE NAMING COMMITTEE SHALL COMPILE A LIST, SO, OKAY, PERFECT.
SO THEN, THEN THAT MIGHT ADDRESS IT IF WE JUST CALL IT A COMMUNITY COMMITTEE, AND WE SAY THAT THEY'RE SERVING IN THAT ADVISORY CAPACITY, UM, THAT, THAT ALIGNS.
I THINK THAT'S EXACTLY, ACTUALLY, WHEN YOU READ THAT, THAT'S THE FIRST THING THAT I THOUGHT IN MY HEAD WAS LET'S PUT THE WORD COMMUNITY.
SO I THINK THAT'S, I AGREE WITH RACHEL AND THEN LET'S CUT.
DO YOU WANT ME TO START, I'LL START DOING IT NOW, BUT YOU HAD SOMETHING TO SAY YES.
UH, MY, UH, ACTUALLY KIND OF DIP IT IN THE SNAP.
I WON'T BE TALKING ABOUT, I'M TALKING ABOUT THE, UH, THE COMMITTEE MEMBERS.
AND SO YOU SAID THAT YOU WONDERED, I'VE BEEN, UM, TALKING ABOUT THE CHILL OF WELLBEING TO WAR SHOULD BE, UH, BASICALLY DIRECTING TRUE TO IN TERMS OF A DIFFERENT GRASS AREA, BECAUSE IF YOU'RE THE CHAIR, EVEN NOT EVEN A HEROIN, I THINK YOU'VE MISUNDERSTOOD DR.
SHE SAID THE CHAIR OF THAT NEW COMMITTEE SHOULD BE WHOMEVER REPRESENTS THAT AREA.
BUT THEN ALSO
WHAT I HEARD SOMEWHERE THAT WOULD SHOW THAT I DID NOT.
SO NOW W SO AGAIN, AR IS GOING TO HAVE TO BE REVISED BASED ON, SO YOU SHOULDN'T BE DISCUSSING THE ARROWS BECAUSE WE HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH WHAT, WITH, WHAT WOULD YOU UNDERSTAND? AND IT'S KIND OF A, WHAT WE DECIDED THAT THE AAR WILL HAVE TO FOLLOW THE POLICY.
SO THAT WILL BE A DIFFERENT, UH, YOU KNOW, FIRST OF ALL, IS ASSESSMENT APPROVED BY THE BOARD ANYWAY, SO, OKAY.
SO ARE WE GOOD WITH
SO I'M JUST, YEAH, I'M THROWING IT OUT THERE AS FOR NUMBER NINE.
THIS WOULD BE AN ADDITION, GC 3.9.
SO AGAIN, THE BOARD WILL CONSIDER AND DECIDE ON CHANGES TO A SCHOOL'S NAME, MASCOT OR COLORS AFTER RECEIVING A RECOMMENDATION FROM A COMMITTEE COMPRISED OF THE REQUESTING SCHOOLS, SIC MEMBERS, STAFF, STUDENTS, AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS.
SO IT DEPART, I JUST WANTED TO START WITH SOMETHING.
SO THIS WOULD BE FOR ANYTHING THAT WAS NOT A BRAND NEW SCHOOL, RACHEL.
SO MY ONLY QUESTION IS PROCESS.
SO IF A, UM, JUST A HYPOTHETICAL, IF A SCHOOL DECIDED THAT THEY WANTED TO FORM, OR THE PRINCIPAL WANTED TO FORM A COMMITTEE COMPRISED OF SIC STAFF, STUDENTS, AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS, BECAUSE THEY SAW A NEED TO CHANGE THE NAME, MASCOT AND COLORS, THEY ARE CREATING THEIR OWN COMMITTEE.
AND THEN THEY'RE COMING TO THE BOARD TO ASK US TO CONSIDER AND DECIDE THOSE THINGS.
IS THAT WHAT THE PROCESS WOULD LOOK LIKE? UM, THAT SOUNDS GOOD.
BECAUSE ANY BOARD IS DIRECTING THE CREATION OF THE COMMITTEE.
UM, AND SO I'M JUST TRYING TO MAKE SURE I UNDERSTAND THE PROCESS OF IF THERE'S GOING TO BE ANY EXISTING FACILITY THAT NEEDS AN OR ANY EXISTING SCHOOL THAT NEEDS A NAME, CHANGE THAT BASICALLY THE SCHOOL ITSELF COULD CREATE A COMMITTEE AT ANY POINT IN TIME AND BRING THAT FORWARD.
SO, SO THAT'S WHAT I'M, I'M SUGGESTING.
NOW WE THROW IN SOME CLARIFYING WORDS IN THERE IF NEED BE, BUT, BUT I'M BRINGING FORWARD THE SUGGESTION THAT IF IT'S AN ORGANIC REQUEST FROM A SCHOOL THAT THEY HAVE TO GO THROUGH THE PROCESS OF PUTTING TOGETHER A COMMITTEE AND
[00:30:01]
COMING UP WITH A RECOMMENDATION TO BRING FORWARD TO THE BOARD.WELL, I THINK THIS IS SIMILAR TO THE WAY, UM, ADJUNCT FACILITIES ARE NAMED, UH, OH, WE LOST YOU THERE.
CAN YOU HEAR ME? I CAN'T HEAR YOU NOW.
I'M JUST SAYING, I THINK THAT WHAT THIS IS TRYING TO, UM, DO IS, YOU KNOW, WE, WE CURRENTLY HAVE A POLICY LIKE THIS FOR ADJUNCT FACILITIES, RIGHT? UM, A COUPLE LIKE THAT, UH, COMMITTEE, THE SIC COMMITTEES GET TOGETHER.
THEY DECIDE WE WANT SOMETHING NAMED, LIKE WHEN THEY WANTED, UH, THAT TRACK NAMED AFTER MR. BLAZE, THEY RAN IT THROUGH THEIR COMMITTEE.
THEY CAME TO THE SCHOOL BOARD AND THEY SOUGHT APPROVAL.
THAT'S I THOUGHT IT WAS IN OUR POLICY AS WELL.
NUMBER 10, IT SAYS, UM, OH, EIGHT, 10, THE SUPERINTENDENT SHELL ENSURE THAT ANY COMMITTEE SUPPORTED TO RECOMMEND SCHOOL NAMES UNDERSTAND THAT.
AND THEN LETTER C SAYS ADJUNCT FACILITIES AND ATHLETIC FACILITIES MAYBE NAMED FOR INDIVIDUALS AS SPECIFIED IN DISTRICT A R'S.
SO WE JUST, OUR POLICY DIDN'T, UH, SIGNIFY HOW THAT CAME ABOUT.
AND THAT'S WHAT THIS IS TRYING TO DO NOW.
PREPARING FOR TODAY'S MEETING.
AND I WAS READING THROUGH ALL THIS AND COMING UP WITH SOME IDEAS.
THAT'S HOW I TOOK A CAFE, BUT I, I'M NOT SURE IF EVERYBODY'S IN AGREEMENT.
SO, NO, I, I THINK THAT, I AGREE WITH THAT.
I THINK I THOUGHT THAT I HA I'VE BEEN READING IT SO MANY TIMES.
I THOUGHT THAT THAT WAS ALREADY IN THERE, BUT IT MUST BE IN THE AR YEAH.
THERE'S, THERE'S A, THERE'S A REAL PROCESS DAR ABOUT ROMAN NUMERAL FIVE AND EXACTLY WHAT TO DO FOR NAMING ADJUNCT FACILITIES.
WELL, ACTUALLY I HAVE ACTUALLY, I HAVE A CONCERN, I THINK VACCINE POLICY THAT WE HAVE, AND THAT'S WHAT IT HAS.
THAT'S WHAT, GOD'S WHERE WE AT RIGHT NOW.
UH, AND BASICALLY BASICALLY USING WHAT YOU JUST SAID, BECAUSE WHAT HAPPENS IS THE SAME SIC CODE FOR WHAT WE'VE BEEN TOLD AND HAVE A CUP OF CONVERSATION TODAY THAT THE SIC, AND THEY DID TALK ABOUT THE CHANGING OF HOW TO EAT.
WE'LL LOOK AT THAT AS I EATING AND THEY WON'T OKAY WITH THAT.
SO I THINK THAT WE NEED TO GO DEEPER THAT THAT'S NOT A DECISION THAT SERIOUSLY NEEDS TO COME TO THE DISTRICT LEVEL AND TO THE BOARD BECAUSE THEY'RE THE PEOPLE ELECT THE BOARD TO OVERLOOK THINGS OF THAT NATURE.
SO THEREFORE THAT NEEDS TO COME TO THE BOARD, NOT TO, BUT MR. SMITH, I'M SORRY, BUT WE'RE SAYING COME TO THE BALLOON, BUT THAT'S NOT HOW I UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU, WHAT YOU JUST SAID WAS THAT THE PRINCIPAL TO GET A COMMITTEE, THE PRINCIPAL SHOULD NOT BE DOING THAT.
I DIFFER THERE BECAUSE, BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT HAPPENED THE FIRST TIME.
AND THAT'S HOW I GOT PASSES BECAUSE THE SIC, THE PRINCIPAL, THEY DISCUSSED THE SITUATION OF THE EAGLE, SO THAT IF IT CAME TO THE BOARD THE FIRST TIME, THEN THE COMMUNITY WOULD HAVE KNOWN ABOUT IT.
BUT B THAT WOULD BE THAT THE PRINCIPAL DID DO, BUT GUESS WHAT ARE SAID, THAT THAT'S WHY WE HAD NO IDEA.
SO THAT'S ALSO, THEREFORE YOU HAVE TO GET DIFFERENT RESULTS.
YOU HAVE TO DO SOMETHING DIFFERENT.
LET ME JUST MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE SAFE.
CAUSE I GOT TO MAKE SURE I'M JUST HERE TO SAY, WE'RE NOT TALKING ABOUT AN AR OKAY.
SO WE'RE TALKING ABOUT, SO RIGHT HERE, LET ME FINISH.
SO IF SOME SCHOOL WANTS TO CHANGE THEIR NAME OR MASCOT OR THEIR COLORS, THAT THAT SCHOOL WILL HAVE TO GET TOGETHER, I CAN BETTY, HEY, JUST LET ME FINISH A COMMITTEE COMPRISED OF THE SIC MEMBERS.
NOW, THIS IS JUST A SUGGESTION.
WE HAVE THIS NOTE HERE IN POLICY, THIS DOESN'T EXIST.
SO IT WOULD HAVE TO A COMMITTEE COMPRISED OF THE RE REQUESTING SCHOOLS, SIC MEMBERS, STAFF, STUDENTS, AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS.
THEY TALK ABOUT IT AND THEY BRING THEIR RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD THAT DID NOT HAPPEN IN THE INSTANCE OF WHICH YOU ARE SPEAKING
[00:35:01]
ABOUT WHAT YOU WERE SPEAKING.WELL, THE ONLY PART DIDN'T HAPPEN, THEY DID GET, THEY DID GET THE COMMUNITY MEMBERS AND THEY DID GET SIC NUMBERS, ALL THAT, THAT DIDN'T HAPPEN.
BUT THE ONLY PART THAT DIDN'T HAPPEN AND EVERYTHING THAT I I'M GOING TO CALL IT, A SCIENCE, A BETA SPAIN, ALTHOUGH THAT DIDN'T HAPPEN, THAT IT DIDN'T BRING IT TO THE BOARD.
SO NO COMING OUT OF THE GATE, THE BOARD SHOULD BE INVOLVED.
LOOK, THE BOARD SHOULDN'T BE INVOLVED WITH THE BACKUP OF IT BECAUSE HOW DO I, AS A BOARD MEMBER AND I REPRESENT AN AREA, HOW DO I KNOW THAT ALL OF THE DIRECT CONSTITUENTS ARE ON THERE? OH, AND ALSO THAT'S ALSO, THAT'S ALSO A TURTLE OR IN TERMS OF RELATIONSHIPS WITH A BOARD MEMBER, SHADOW RELATIONSHIPS WITH EVERYONE ALONG WITHIN THAT PROCESS.
SO THEREFORE NOW YOU'RE SHUTTING THAT WOMAN OUT BECAUSE YOU'RE BRINGING IT BACK OUT OF THE LAND AT THE LAST MINUTE.
BUT THEN MR. SMITH, I, I, I'M NOT SURE, BUT I KNOW THAT SEVERAL BOARD MEMBERS ATTENDED EVERY SIC MEETING OF THEIR SCHOOLS.
I MEAN, AND SO IF YOU ARE THAT TALK ABOUT RELATIONSHIPS.
IF YOU ATTEND THE SIC MEETINGS OF THE SCHOOLS IN YOUR AREA, YOU KNOW WHAT THE SIC IS, ARE TALKING ABOUT.
AND SO TO, TO, IF I'M UNDERSTANDING YOU, EVERYONE WILL DO THAT EVERYWHERE.
EVERY WOMAN WOULD GO, DON'T DO THAT.
THAT'S THE WAY OF DOWNPLAYING IT.
IF IT'S THE RIGHT, IF IT'S IN BLACK AND WHITE, IT HAPPENS.
IF IT'S NOT, THEN EVERYTHING THAT DOESN'T MATTER.
I CAME OFF THE ASSUMPTION THAT EVERY BOARD MEMBER IS GOING THERE, I'M GOING BASICALLY OFF OF WHAT'S THE BLACKOUT, BECAUSE SOMETIMES WE ATTEMPT TO GO SCREW UP A BLACK AND WHITE.
SO I'M GOING TO GO STRAIGHT OUT FOR BLACK AND WHITE.
DID THE ISSUE COME? THE BOTTOM LINE IS MY POINT, IS THAT THE WHOLE PROCESS TO START THE BOARD LEVEL AND THEY SHOULD BE WORKING TOGETHER TO GET IT DONE.
DOES IT MATCH EVERYBODY? ELSE'S OKAY.
UM, MR. EARL CAMPBELL, UM, I'VE BEEN SITTING HERE LISTENING TO ALL THE COMMENTS AND IT SEEMS TO ME THAT WE DON'T REALLY UNDERSTAND WHAT WE ARE DOING.
IF YOU REMEMBER WHEN MAE ROVER CAME TO US ABOUT THE COLOR AND THE MASK, IT CAME FROM THE SCHOOL YOU DID NOT CAME FOR THE BOARD MEMBERS.
AND THE FIRST TIME THEY CAME TO US, WE DISAPPROVE IT BECAUSE OF, I THINK THE MASCOT, SOMETHING ABOUT A SODA OR SOMETHING.
THEN THEY WENT BACK, THEY WENT BACK AND THEY CAME BACK THE SECOND TIME AND WE APPROVE IT.
IT SHOULDN'T BE DONE THE BOARD.
IT DOESN'T HAVE NO BUSINESS IF A SCHOOL AND THEN THE, UH, THE COMMUNITY WANT TO CHANGE THE NUMBER, CHANGE THE COLOR IN THE SCHOOL.
I MEAN THE MASCOT OR ANY COLORS THAT SHOULD COME THE RECOMMENDATION COME FROM THEM, NOT THE BOAT AND NOT THE DISTRICT.
UM, CAN, CAN YOU JUST SCROLL UP SO I CAN SEE EIGHT REAL QUICK? I WAS JUST GONNA, I WANT TO MAKE SURE I'M CLEAR.
SO THAT NUMBER EIGHT, NEW SCHOOLS, NUMBER NINE IS GOING TO BE EXISTING SCHOOLS, BUT IS THIS ALSO ENCOMPASSING ADJUNCT FACILITIES? THAT'S NUMBER 10.
SO, UM, WHAT DO YOU THINK, PLEASE THROW IN? DO YOU THINK A CHECK PLEASE, PLACE GUYS.
I JUST DID THIS AS A STARTING POINT.
SO WHAT DO YOU THINK, RACHEL, I GREATLY APPRECIATE YOU DOING IT TOO, BECAUSE THIS IS GONNA HELP US SAVE A LOT OF TIME.
UM, SO I THINK NINE SHOULD BE EXISTING SCHOOLS AND THERE MAY NEED TO BE SOME THEORY, UH, PLAIN ONE IN REGARD TO AN ADJUNCT FACILITY.
I THINK THE ONLY THING THAT I, I FEEL AS STRONG IN THE AR THAT I PULLED OUT OF THE AR IS THAT IT REQUIRES A TWO THIRDS OF VOTE.
UM, THE ADJUNCT FACILITIES NAMING OF THEM IS LIMITED TO SIC S SO IT'S NOT A COMMITTEE.
IT'S JUST THE SIC OF THAT SCHOOL OR AREA COMES TOGETHER TO NAME THAT ADJUNCT FACILITY.
AND IT REQUIRES A TWO-THIRDS VOTE.
AND I THINK THAT'S STRONG, UM, AND SOMETHING THAT WE MAY WANT TO CONSIDER, UM, ENCOMPASSING.
SO I THINK NINE SHOULD BE LIMITED JUST TO EXISTING SCHOOLS, UM, AND TO REQUIRE A TWO-THIRDS VOTE SIMILAR TO, UM, WHAT ADJUNCT FACILITIES DO PRESENTLY.
I THINK THAT'S A GREAT SUGGESTION.
WHY DON'T YOU, WHERE WOULD YOU ADD THAT IN? OKAY, LET ME READ IT REAL QUICK.
[00:40:07]
UM, LET ME LOOK REAL QUICK.MANDATION SUPPORTED BY TWO THIRDS, BUT WAS THE THING RACIAL? YEAH.
A RECOMMENDATION THAT, AND WE CAN, I CAN TAKE THIS.
THIS IS JUST ME TAKING LANGUAGE DAR ENDORSED BY AT LEAST A TWO THIRDS VOTE OF THE SIC.
SORRY, NOT THE SOC THE COMMITTEE, MY APOLOGIES AT THE RISK IN A RECOMMENDATION THAT WAS ENDORSED BY, OKAY.
AT LEAST A TWO THIRDS VOTE OF THE COMMITTEE, BLAH, BLAH.
NO, I WAS, UH, I WAS THINKING, I THINK WHAT RACHEL ATTRACTION RECOMMEND IS REALLY GOOD.
CAUSE I WAS ALSO THINKING THAT MAYBE WE COULD COMBINE EIGHT AND NINE, BUT I THINK IT'S BETTER.
THIS IS THE WAY WE DO IT, BUT YEAH.
AFTER RECEIVING A RECOMMENDATION OF AT LEAST HAVE A MINIMUM OF TWO THIRDS RECEIVING A RECOMMENDED ENDORSED BY A MINIMUM OF TWO THIRDS OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS, UH, RECOMMENDATION, THAT MUST BE ENDORSED FOR YOU NOW.
SO BACK TO RECOMMENDATION, I GET A RECOMMENDATION THAT MUST BE ENDORSING THE INDOORS YOU'RE ON RACHEL.
ALRIGHT, EXCELLENT, GREAT CHANGES.
UH, UH, TINA GOT A LOT OF GOOD THAT'S REAL GOOD.
I THINK THAT'S AN EXCELLENT SUGGESTION.
AND I WOULD LIKE TO CONSIDER ADDING THAT TO NUMBER EIGHT ALSO.
UM, SO DAVID, YOU'RE SUGGESTING THAT THE AD HOC COMMITTEE BRINGS FORTH THE RECOMMENDATION THAT IT ALSO HAS HAD A TWO THIRDS VOTE FROM THE COMMITTEE.
I THINK THAT'S JUST A REALLY, REALLY GREAT IDEA.
SO DAVID'S SUGGESTING BACK A NUMBER EIGHT.
HEY, DAVID, COULD YOU, UM, SAY THAT FOR ROB AND WHERE YOU THINK THAT WOULD GO AFTER CONSIDERING A RECOMMENDATION THAT MUST BE ENDORSED BY AT LEAST TWO THIRDS VOTE FROM THE COMMITTEE, EXACT SAME WORDING WE HAVE IN NUMBER NINE, MAYBE.
AND THEN YOU CAN TAKE OUT, SORRY.
PLEASE SAY TWO THIRDS VOTE BY A BOARD APPOINTED AD HOC COMMUNITY COMMITTEE.
SO EXCELLENT SUGGESTIONS GUYS.
SO LET'S TALK NOW ABOUT ADJUNCT FACILITIES AND, UM, IF YOU GO TO ON TO ADJUNCT FACILITIES, UM, AND OH EIGHT, UM, I JUST SUGGESTED, SO THE OEA SAYS THE SUPERINTENDENT SHALL ENSURE THAT ANY COMMITTEES APPOINTED TO RECOMMEND TO THE BOARD SCHOOL NAMES, MASCOTS, OR CALLERS, UNDERSTAND THAT.
AND IT SAYS IN HERE ADJUNCT FACILITIES, INCLUDING ATHLETICS, MAYBE NAMED FOR INDIVIDUALS, BUT IT DOESN'T REALLY GIVE US A PROCESS.
SO DO YOU WANT TO, UM, PRETTY MUCH COPY THE PROCEDURE OR ADJUNCT THAT WE HAVE FOR CHANGING INTO A BACKUP TO WHAT WE JUST FINISHED? WELL, ACTUALLY, BEFORE YOU MOVE ON, CAN WE STOP WHAT THAT PROCESS LOOKS LIKE AS WELL?
[00:45:01]
BECAUSE IT'S STILL FOR INTERPRETATION.AND SO AS WE SPELL OUT WHAT THE PROCESS IS LIKE, THEN AS, AS, AS THERE'S LESS ROOM FOR INTERPRETATION, LIKE WHAT, WHY DON'T YOU GO AHEAD? WHY DON'T YOU SPELL IT? I MEAN, WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO? G WHAT ARE THEY ASSIGNED TO YOU? I'M SORRY, MAN.
SO EXPLAIN WHAT YOU THINK THE PROCESS IS AND WHAT, HOW WOULD YOU LIKE TO CHANGE THIS? BRING FORWARD YOUR IDEA, RIGHT.
WELL ACTUALLY IT, WHENEVER WHAT W WHAT I'M SAYING IS, WHAT IS THIS PROCESS LIKE? HOW DID THIS PROCESS START? I MEAN, YOU KNOW, W WE'RE SAYING
BUT
SO IF WE START AT NUMBER EIGHT, THE PROCESS WOULD BE THAT WE HAVE JUST BUILT A NEW SCHOOL, AND WE GOT TO NAME THAT SCHOOL.
WE ALL KNOW WE HAVE TO NAME THAT SCHOOL.
SO THE PROCESS WILL BE THAT, HEY, THE SCHOOL IS BUILT.
NUMBER NINE, WE'RE GOING TO HAVE SOMEONE IN A SCHOOL LEVEL OR COMMUNITY THAT GOES TO THE SCHOOL AND SAYS, WE NEED TO CHANGE THIS.
AND THE PRINCIPAL WOULD SAY, WELL, BY ORDER OF THE POLICY, RIGHT.
AND THAT GIVES THE PROCESS, NOT THE POLICY, BUT THE H R WE'LL GIVE THE PROCESS.
WE'VE GOT TO PUT TOGETHER A COMMITTEE, A COMMUNITY COMMITTEE, AND THAT COMMITTEE MUST BE COMPRISED OF WHAT WAS IN THAT, WHAT WILL BE IN THE AAR.
AND THEY HAVE TO VOTE A TWO-THIRDS VOTE TO BRING THAT RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD.
SO, SO THE POLICY DOESN'T NECESSARILY, YOU KNOW, WELL, YEAH.
BECAUSE REMEMBER THE POLICY IS UP HERE.
SO I THROW OUT TO THE, UM, TO YOU ALL NOW, HOW DO WE ADDRESS ADJUNCT FACILITIES? UH, RACHEL, AND I THINK THAT, UM, CAN, SHOULD ACTUALLY BE AN 11 AND THERE SHOULD BE A 10 THAT DISCUSSES THE ADJUNCT FACILITIES THAT SHOULD SIMILARLY MIRROR.
UM, WHAT IS PRESENTLY NUMBER NINE? UM, I THINK WE NEED TO HAVE A CONVERSATION OF WHETHER OR NOT THE NAMING OF ADJUNCT FACILITIES, UM, IS LEFT AT THE SOLE DISCRETION OF THE SIC, OR IF IT ALSO WOULD BE A COMMUNITY COMMITTEE.
OH, I DEFINITELY THINGS SHOULD BE COMMUNITY, BUT IF WE WERE TO JUST REFERENCE AAR, NOT SET, YOU KNOW, BUT THEY DO.
UM, I DON'T MIND REFERENCING ARS PERSONALLY.
AND I UNDERSTAND THAT, BUT THERE'S SOMETIMES WHEN YOU GOT SOME GOOD WORD CHOICES AND IT'S RIGHT IN FRONT OF YOU, UM, I THINK USING IT AS A GUIDING POINT AND GIVING US SOME LANGUAGE IT'S GREAT IN SITUATIONS LIKE THIS, WHERE WE'RE CREATING SOMETHING FROM NOTHING.
SO THEY DON'T, THEY DON'T, THEY DON'T ENUMERATE THE DIFFERENT THINGS.
SO IF WE GO BACK TO, UM, IF WE GO BACK TO NUMBER NINE AND JUST USE THAT WORDING FOR ADJUNCT FACILITIES, HOW WOULD THAT, HOW WOULD THAT WORK OUT, KATHY? YOU CAN'T SEE NINE THERE.
UM, SO THE BOARD WILL CONSIDER RECOMMENDATIONS OR NAMING ADJUNCT FACILITIES AFTER RECEIVING A RECOMMENDATION MUST BE ENDORSED BY AT LEAST TWO THIRDS, BOTH FROM A COMPANY TO PFIZER, REQUESTING SCHOOL, SIC MEMBERS, STAFF, STUDENTS, AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS.
SO NUMBER 10, CONSIDER A NAME FOR, AND CAN WE PUT IT FOR ADJUNCT FACILITIES? WHAT, WHAT, WHAT DOES THAT, WHAT DOES THAT MEAN IN THERE? ROBERT, WHAT IS AN ADJUNCT OR SELLING TO ME? IT'S ANY FACILITY OUTSIDE OF THE MAIN BUILDING.
A COUPLE OF THEM, BUT I THINK ONCE AGAIN, THIS IS NOT, THERE'S NOT A BLACK AND WHITE THERE'S NO, IT'S NOT ROBERT'S HERE.
SO, SO ANY FACILITY OTHER THAN THE MAIN SCHOOL BUILDINGS? WELL, I MEAN, ARE WE ACTUALLY, YEAH, YOU'RE RIGHT, EXACTLY.
WELL, I MEAN, IT'S TALKED OUTSIDE OF JUST THE VEIN OF THE SMALL STUDY.
I MEAN, PHYSICALLY OUTSIDE, I KIND OF KNOW, LIKE METAPHORICALLY, IT'S NOT GOING TO BE FIELDING SOME SUBSET
[00:50:01]
OF THE BUILDING.UM, UM, OUR CURRENT, UH, POLICY, UH, DESERT SAYS ADJUNCT FACILITIES, INCLUDING ATHLETIC FACILITIES.
SO, YOU KNOW, WE COULD ADD THAT THERE WHERE IT'S, UM, OH, THAT'S 8 0 8, UM, TAB 10 C.
WE'RE GOING TO GET TO THAT ONE AFTER THIS ONE, TOO.
SO, YOU KNOW WHAT, I THINK IT WOULD BE AN AWFULLY LENGTHY LIST TO LIST ADJUNCT FACILITIES.
UM, SO MAYBE LIKE KATHY JUST SAID, WE JUST USE THE WORDING THAT WE HAD IN OBA 10 TO SAY ADJUNCT FACILITIES, INCLUDING ATHLETIC FACILITIES.
AND THEN FROM THERE, THAT'S MY SUGGESTION, BUT THAT WOULD BE OKAY.
KATHY, I THINK THAT OTHERWISE WE WOULD BE, WE'D HAVE A LIST OF I ALONG KIND OF SCARS.
AND THEN, SO IS THIS GOING TO THAT NUMBER NINE? OKAY.
DAVID, YOU WANT TO SHARE AN IDEA? UM, YEAH, I LIKE THAT MIMICKING NUMBER NINE.
CAUSE WE'RE, WE HAVE TO CONSIDER AND DECIDE.
WE HAVE TO GET THAT DECISION IN THERE.
THEN THEY WERE MAKING A DECISION QUICK.
KIND OF MAKES IT MOVE THAT IN SEPARATE DAVID AND DECIDE AFTER CONSIDER, WAIT A MINUTE.
I, A LITTLE CONSIDER CONSIDER AN SO WENDY'S SUGGESTING, WE SAY APPROVED, CONSIDER AN APPROVED.
OH, SO I HAVE A QUESTION ON THE WAY YOU WORDED THIS.
CAUSE I ACTUALLY HAVE A SITUATION RIGHT NOW.
WE'RE GOING TO BRING TO THE NEXT OPERATIONS COMMITTEE, SOME SUGGESTIONS FOR BETTER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL.
I THINK THEY NAMED THE WRESTLING ROOM.
AND SO THEY'RE COMING WITH A SUGGESTION HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE SSC AND THE PRINCIPAL.
NOW YOUR POLICY SAYS, AND IT'S A UNANIMOUS VOTE OR IT WAS A UNANIMOUS VOTE, BUT NOW YOU'RE SAYING THEY ALSO HAVE TO HAVE STEP, WELL, I GUESS THE PRINCIPLES IT SAYS AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS OUT, WHAT IS OUR, SO NOW THE SIC BRINGS THE RECOMMENDATION.
SO HOW DO WE SAY THAT THEY SATISFY THAT? DID THEY HAVE TO NOW GO OUT AND FORM A COMMITTEE THAT PULLS IN STAFF AND STUDENTS AND COMMUNITY? AND WHAT DOES THAT MEAN?
I WAS GOING TO SAY, UM, YOU KNOW, THIS HAS TO GO FOR A FULL READING AND BOARD APPROVAL.
SO I MEAN, IT IT'LL BE COMING BACK AT A FUTURE MEETING IF THE BATTERY CREEK STUFF IS COMING AT THE NEXT MEETING AND THAT'S, UM, YOU KNOW, WE JUST, IT'S A MATTER OF WHEN THIS TAKES A FULL EFFECT.
WHAT ABOUT MY POINT IS THAT'S A REAL LIVE SITUATION THAT I'M TRYING TO PUT TOWARDS WHAT YOU JUST SAID TO THINK ABOUT WHAT MY NEXT STEP IS.
LET'S SAY THE NEXT ONE AFTER BATTERY FREE.
UM, SO WE JUST TELL THE SCHOOL TO GO PULL A COMMITTEE TOGETHER.
WELL, I THINK THE AR HAS GOT SOME, THE AAR THAT THIS IS WHAT YOU SHOULD HAVE BEEN UNDERNEATH.
ANYWAY, THIS IS HOW YOU KNOW, UH, VERY QUICK SHOULD HAVE FOLLOWED.
SO I DO LET FOLLOW WHATEVER'S IN YOUR CURRENT AR POLICIES.
MY QUESTION IS HOW WOULD WE TELL THE SCHOOLS TO MEET YOUR POLICY? OKAY.
SO MY THING IS, SO HOW MANY STUDENTS, HOW MANY, YOU KNOW, THEY GET ONE STUDENT, ONE STAFF MEMBER, THE SIC, AND ONE COMMUNITY MEMBER.
DOES THAT SATISFY TO BE VERY HONEST WITH YOU? I DON'T THINK THAT'S OUR LEVEL DECISION.
AND SO THE SCHOOL COMES AND SAYS, YEAH, WE HAD ONE PARENT.
YOU HAD ONE PARENT, ONE STUDENT, ONE STAFF MEMBER AND THEY REPRESENTED EVERYBODY.
[00:55:01]
I PERSONALLY WOULD SAY SEND IT BACK AND GET MORE INPUT.SO I DON'T KNOW THAT WE CAN DICTATE, IT MUST BE COMPRISED OF 13 PEOPLE AND SIX OF WHOM ARE SORRY.
RACHEL, WOULD YOU FINISH? I'M SORRY.
WELL, THE AR HAS A KIND OF A GUIDELINE FOR THAT ON THE SCHOOL'S ONE.
SO I WOULD THINK THAT IT MAKES SENSE SINCE WE'RE TRYING TO MAKE EVERYTHING COME INTO ALIGNMENT THAT WHEN THE AIR IS REWRITTEN BY ADMINISTRATION, THAT IT MIRRORS THAT MAKEUP AS WELL.
SO YOU COULD, THAT'S JUST MY ASSUMPTION.
SO ROBERT HAS A COMEBACK QUESTION.
NO, I MEAN, I THINK THE WAY I COULD SEE IT WORKING IS THEY WOULD DO A PUBLICLY ADVERTISED MEETING IN THEIR SCHOOL AND JUST WHOEVER SHOWS UP, IT'S ALL THAT, THAT'S JUST IT.
I MEAN, QUITE ALL SAY WE PUBLICLY ADVERTISE AND ASK FOR EVERYBODY AND EVERYBODY'S IN THE ROOM, YOU'RE ALL NOW ON A COMMITTEE.
SO THEN YOU VOTE WITH EVERYBODY IN THE ROOM.
THAT'S BECAUSE THAT'S A MAJOR CHANGE.
I GUESS I'VE SEEN WAS JUST AN ORGANIZED COMMITTEE TO NOW.
IT'S NOT AN ORGANIZED COMMITTEE AND YOU'RE ASKING SCHOOL, PUT IT RIGHT.
YOU KNOW, SIC IS, MIGHT GET FOUR PEOPLE.
SO I THINK IT PROBABLY SHOULD BE REPRESENTATIVE OF MORE PEOPLE.
SO OPEN, COME ON, EVERYBODY COME, ANYONE THAT'S INTERESTED.
AND IF YOU DON'T SHOW IS YOU DON'T GET A VOICE.
SO DAVID, UM, BANKS, A COUPLE OF THINGS ON NUMBER NINE, CONSIDER AND APPROVE.
AND THEN WE NEEDED TO DELETE, DECIDE ON CONSIDERING GROUP CHANGES.
AND THEN ON THE THEORETICAL QUESTION OF POLICIES AND ARS POLICIES ARE SUPPOSED TO STAY KIND OF BROAD AND ARS OR THE INTERPRETATION.
SO, YOU KNOW, YOU CAN INTERPRET IT ANY WAY YOU WANT TO FORM THE COMMITTEES, WHICH ARE Y'ALL DONE REALLY WELL IN THE PAST.
I LIKE ROBINSON WAS TALKING ABOUT BATTERY CREEK.
IF IT'S COMING THROUGH, IF THE RECOMMENDATION COMING FROM THE SIC, THE PRINCIPAL AND THE STAFF AT THE SCHOOL, THERE'S NO PROBLEM.
THEY DON'T HAVE TO VOTE, THEY WILL VOTE, BUT THEY DON'T HAVE TO TELL US THE VOTE THEN NUMBER PEOPLE THAT VOTED FOR IT OR NOT, BECAUSE THEY'RE NOT GOING TO BRING SOMETHING TO THE BOARD UNLESS THEY HAVE THE MAJORITY OF THE VOTES.
I THINK ROBIN HAS A LEGITIMATE QUESTION ON TERMS OF HOW MUCH POWER IS A LOT TO TEACH ONE OF THOSE FACTORS AND TRENDS OF THE COMMITTEE FORMATION.
AND, UH, YOU KNOW, I THINK IT'S UP TO TWO FRANKLIN DECIDE THAT AS A SUPERINTENDENT AND THE ARS IS WHAT WE WILL LOOK AT AND DECIDE WHETHER THAT INTERPRETATION MEETS OUR, OUR QUALIFICATION OR NOT.
BUT, UH, CERTAINLY I THINK PERSONALLY THAT THE SIC IS, IS THE FUNDAMENTAL COMMUNITY GROUP AND THAT SCHOOL THEN ANY OTHER SUPPORT SHOULD NOT OVERRIDE WHAT THE SIC IS, UH, UH, NUMBERS SHOULD BE.
SO, AND I DON'T AGREE WITH ROBERTS CREPITUS AND THAT WE BRING IN A GROUP OF PEOPLE AND WE ALL VOTE ON IT AND THEY ASSIGNED SEATS THAT 12 MEMBERS AND THERE'S 20 PEOPLE COMING IN WITHOUT ANY REAL LONG TIME FOCUS ON, ON THE SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT.
OUTBOARDING THEM IN TERMS OF WHAT DIRECTION WE'RE GOING.
SO, YEAH, I THINK, I THINK THE FRIGHTENED IS THE CONCEPT.
SOME KIND OF TONE ON WHAT THAT COMMITTEE THAT LOOK LIKE FROM OUR COMMUNITY BASED COMMUNITY SITE SEES AND WHATEVER WE NEED TO LOOK AT IT AND SAY, YEAH, WE'LL AGREE WITH THAT.
AS A COMFORTABLE WITH THIS GROUP, WE'LL ACCEPT.
UM, JUST NOT LISTENING TO THAT CONVERSATION.
IT SOUNDS WELL FOR THEM, IT GETS CLEANLINESS CLARIFICATION.
NR IS BASICALLY THE SUPERINTENDENTS COMPETITION AND WE DON'T BORE ON THAT.
SO, SO IT SOUNDS LIKE, LIKE THE BOARD ITSELF LEADS TO
[01:00:04]
GET SOME TYPE OF CLARIFICATION.UM, AND THEN NOT JUST ALL ON THESE
WHAT OUR EXPECTATION IS BECAUSE THIS BELONG TO ROB THIS, THIS, THIS, THE PEOPLE WHO WANT TO JUST CALL IN AND GET ON, ON THIS, UH, CAPA WHO'S INVOLVED IN THIS CONVERSATION.
THERE ARE SEVERAL DIFFERENT LEVEL OF EXPECTATIONS AND I'M NOT HEARING MUCH NEW SEC BECAUSE, AND THEN TERMS OF IT, ROBIN ONE GOOD POINT WHERE, WHICH CAME BACK TO MY POINT, YOU KNOW, IN TERMS OF STEP ONE, HOW MANY COMMUNITY MEMBERS REMEMBER BECAUSE YOU, YOU WANT A, A VERY TRANSPARENT, CLEAR DESCRIPTION OF WHAT'S TAKING PLACE WHEREVER YOU'RE GETTING THE COMMITTEE COMMITTEE WILL ALWAYS, SO IT CAN BE FAIR AND OBJECTIVE TO EVERY, EVERY TIME THERE'S ALWAYS CONSISTENCY.
THE SAME AS THREE PARENTS, IT'S ALL FIVE KIDS, UH, SIX MINISTERS IN THE COMMITTEE, WHATEVER THE OUTLINE IS IS THAT WE'RE CONSISTENT IN IT.
SO THE SUPERINTENDENT COME BACK TO THE BOARD AND GIVE US THE ARR SAID WE ARE, WHICH I SAID, THIS IS HOW WE DON'T DO IT.
SO IT'S ALMOST LIKE WE DON'T GO WITH IT.
THEN WE GO, WHATEVER THEY SAY, AND THAT ONE WAS ONE FOR.
AND ONCE, ONCE WE GIVE THEM IT, ONCE WE TELL THEM WHAT WE WANT AND HAVE THEY SEEN DEEM NECESSARY, THEN THEY DO IT, HOW THEY WANT.
AND THAT MAY NOT BE DEEMED HOW THE BOARD PARTICULARLY WANTS IT, BUT THEY SAID, THAT'S WHAT THEY SEE.
AND THAT'S HOW THEIR INTERPRETATION IS THAT THERE'S A PROBLEM THERE.
AND THE PROBLEM THERE IS THAT THAT'S NOT REALLY WHAT THE BOARD WANT, BUT WE'RE SAYING THAT IT'S VERY MIDDLE OF SOCIAL, IT'S CONTRADICTORY.
AND I SEE A LOT OF THAT GOING ON CONSISTENTLY.
AND THEN THAT'S A PROBLEM BECAUSE ONCE AGAIN, WE'RE NOT ON THE, ON THE SAME, ON THE SAME PAGE.
AND EVEN TO GO BACK OUT, REMEMBER RACHEL WAS ASKING, WHEN SHE SAID EARLIER, SHE SAID, OH, WHAT ABOUT WHEN THEY WANT TO CHANGE THE NAME OR SOMETHING? WHAT DOES, WHAT DOES THAT, UM, WHAT, WHAT DOES THAT, DO WE HAVE TO COME BACK TO THE BOARD FOR THAT? AND I DON'T REMEMBER HEARING EXACTLY SAYING THAT, YES, THEY WANT TO CHANGE THE NAME, SOMETHING, WHAT THAT STUPID, THOSE STUFF LOOK LIKE.
AND THAT, AND THAT GOES BACK TO THE CITIZEN THING OF, THEY CAN GO TO THE AIR.
I KNOW IT NEEDS TO BE SPELLED CORRECTLY BY THE BOARD THAT THE BOARD IS THE HEAD.
WE TELL THE SUPERINTENDENT WHAT WE WANT AND HE S HE TAKES IT OUT.
IT DOES AFFECT THE RESULTS POINT BLANK PERIOD.
I'M JUST WANT TO LET YOU KNOW, I HAVE TO LEAVE IN FIVE MINUTES AND I DID WANT TO JUST CONFIRM THAT OUR SIC IS, UM, THERE ARE, THEY'RE REQUIRED TO HAVE CERTAIN MEMBERS ON THEM.
THEY'RE REQUIRED TO HAVE A COMMUNITY MEMBER THEY'RE REQUIRED DEAF PARENTS, AND THAT'S SPELLED OUT IN OUR SIC, UM, YOU KNOW, GUIDELINES AND THAT'S A REQUIREMENT.
I MEAN, THOSE THINGS ARE REQUIRED, SO, YEP.
UM, WE'RE GOING TO ELIMINATE NUMBER 11, JUST DELETE THAT.
AND THEN I THINK WE'RE IN GOOD SHAPE.
SO, UM, MOVING ON TO
UM,
THAT WAS THE ELIMINATED NUMBER 11, WHAT UNDERWEAR IT'S ALREADY COVERED THAT THE BOARD HAS RIGHT.
TO CHANGE THE NAME OF THE PLACE.
SO 10 SAYS THE BOARD WILL RESERVE THE RIGHT TO CHANGE THE NAME OF ANY FACILITY OR ADJUNCT FACILITY WHEN IT DEEMS IS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE DISTRICT TO DO SO.
SO, AND, AND, AND I REALIZE THAT BECAUSE I HEAR THAT THAT'S A VERY POWERFUL STATEMENT.
AND SO ELIMINATING THAT, THAT BRINGS ME, THAT BRINGS ME SOME QUESTIONING.
AND THAT'S WHY I'M ASKING WHILE WE'RE, WHILE WE WERE UNLOADING THE, HE WAS GOING TO SEND ANOTHER ONE, BUT RIGHT THERE IS CLEAR OUT AND CLEARLY STATES THAT UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES, THE BOARD HAS THAT AUTHORITY.
SO EVEN THOUGH IT MAY BE SPELLED OUT IN ONE, BUT IT'S NOT SPELLED OUT WITH THAT MUCH AUTHORITY WRITTEN IN IT.
SO MR.
SO, SO IF 11 WAS REDUNDANT TO 10, YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT
[01:05:01]
THE OLYMPICS.IF MR IS RIGHT, HE'S ELIMINATING NUMBER 11 IN GC THREE.
AND SO CAN YOU PUT THAT BACK IN THERE? CAN YOU JUST GO BACK? WHAT AM I PUTTING BACK? THE 11 YOU DELAYED.
SO THIS NUMBER 11 IS ONE THAT USE, IT'S A VERY POWERFUL STATEMENT.
IT SHOWS THE POWER IS IN THE BOARD SCAN.
AND MR.
SO HE THOUGHT IT WAS REDUNDANT THAT I PUT WORDS IN YOUR MOUTH, OR IS THAT CORRECT? MR.
I'M NOT SURE I WOULD HAVE USED THOSE SAME WORDS, BUT YEAH, IT'S REDUNDANT.
I'VE ALREADY COVERED IT, YOU KNOW, HAD YOUR FACILITIES CAN'T BE CHANGED WITHOUT OUR APPROVAL.
SO, UH, TINA, I DON'T SEE WHERE 11 WAS PREVIOUSLY.
I'LL 11 WAS PREVIOUSLY, RIGHT.
SO 11, THE NUMBER 11 THAT'S ON THE SCREEN.
WAS, OH, WE ATE 10 D I SUGGESTED MOVING IT TO GC THREE BECAUSE I THOUGHT IT MADE MORE SENSE.
SO KATHY, RACHEL, DO I KEEP IT OR LET IT GO.
WHAT ARE WE GOING TO BRING FORWARD TO THE WHOLE BOARD? I THINK IT'S REDUNDANT AND WE ALREADY RESERVED THE RIGHT AND WE APPROVE EVERYTHING IN EIGHT, NINE AND 10.
WE COVER NEW FACILITIES, EXISTING, UH, NEW SCHOOLS, EXISTING SCHOOLS, AND ADJUNCT FACILITIES, INCLUDING ATHLETICS.
SO QUICKLY AT KATHY, YOU LEAVE WHEN YOU NEED TO, BUT FACILITIES THE SUPERINTENDENT SHELL.
THERE ARE FOUR SUBSECTIONS ABC DATE.
I AM RECOMMENDING THAT WE KEEP A FINAL APPROVAL, A NEW OR REQUESTS TO CHANGE SCHOOL NAMES, MASCOTS OR COLORS IS A SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE BOARD.
SO THE SUPERINTENDENT WILL ENSURE THAT, OKAY.
AND B ABOUT ADJUNCT FACILITIES, WHICH IS REALLY LETTER C, I'M SUGGESTING WE ELIMINATE B AND D B SAYS AT SCHOOLS MAY NOT BE NAMED FOR INDIVIDUALS WHILE WE HAVE ROBERT SMALLS AND WE HAVE AGING MCCRACKEN, AND THAT IS OUR INDIVIDUALS AND ASSESSMENT.
UM, SO WE HAVE SEVERAL SCHOOLS THAT ARE NAMED AFTER INDIVIDUALS, SO I SUGGEST WE CAN LINK BACK.
OKAY, DAVID, UM, NORMALLY WHEN YOU HAVE A SENTENCE LIKE THIS, IT'S ABOUT, UM, LIVING INDIVIDUALS, YOU CAN'T, YOU CAN'T NAME A SCHOOL AFTER A CURRENTLY LIVING, BUT YOU CAN NAME IT AFTER A DECEASED.
UM, THAT'S NORMALLY THAT THE INPUT AND, UH, AND I KIND OF AGREE WITH THAT.
SO HOW WOULD YOU LIKE TO SAY THAT, DAVID? YEAH, I KNOW THAT WASN'T TOO ELOQUENT.
THAT'D BE NAVY SCHOOLS MAY NOT BE OR LIVING ROOMS INDIVIDUALLY OR LIVING TINA.
I DEFINITELY THINK THAT'S USUALLY HOW THAT'S IMPORTANT.
UM, AND THE REASON FOR THAT IS OF COURSE, YOU KNOW, WHEN SOMEBODY HASN'T COMPLETED THEIR LIFE, YOU DON'T KNOW YET.
IF THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE SOME SOMETHING'S VERY NEGATIVE COME OUT ABOUT THEM.
THAT'S THAT'S THE WHOLE THING.
BUT I DISAGREE WITH THAT BECAUSE OF THE FACT THAT WE HAVE, WE, WE, WE WE'VE NAMED SOME OTHER APPLE.
MR. CAMPBELL'S IS ON THE BOARD.
EVEN THOUGH IT'S STILL, IT'S STILL RIGHT.
MR. PRESIDE, YOU LOOKED FURTHER LATER ON ADJUNCT FACILITIES MAY BE NAMED AFTER LIVING INDIVIDUALS, BUT NOT SCHOOLS AS TO, I MEAN YEAH.
[01:10:01]
BASICALLY THE, THAT THAT GOES HAND IN HAND, WE, BECAUSE THEY ALMOST STARTED WITH CONTRADICTING OURSELVES BECAUSE WE CAN NAME THIS.WE CAN NAME THE INSIDE OF THIS, UH, THIS AREA DR.
LEUKEMIA LIVE IN AND HE, DID HE GO OUT AND DO SOMETHING TO A KID THEN WHAT ARE, WHAT ARE WE SAYING? THAT'S THE SAME EXACT LEAD.
I MEAN, OUR FRUIT IS A FRUIT, GRAPE OR ORANGE FRUITS.
SO THIS ABILITY TO TAKE PEOPLE DOWN, UM, I'D JUST LIKE TO NOTE THAT WE HAVEN'T NAMED ANY NEW SCHOOL AFTER AN INDIVIDUAL IN OVER 10 YEARS.
SO THAT'S KIND OF BEEN OUR POLICY, UM, EXCEPT LIKE ROBERT SMALLS.
CAUSE IT WAS A CONTINUATION OF AN EXISTING ROBERT SMALLS.
18 MCCRACKEN WAS A CONTINUATION OF 18 MCCRACKEN THAT WAS PREVIOUSLY ON.
SO, UM, WE HAVE NOT NAMED ANYTHING AFTER, SO THAT'S, THAT'S KIND OF A MAJOR CHANGE IF WE DECIDE, OKAY.
I, I PERSONALLY LIKED THE IDEA OF HAVING THE OPTION IF SOMEONE IS DECEASED.
AND IT WAS A HUGE CONTRIBUTOR TO OUR AREA IN THE AREA OF EDUCATION THAT AT LEAST IT WAS AN OPTION.
NOT THAT IT WHAT'S HAPPENED, BUT AT LEAST IT BE AN OPTION.
AND, AND I THINK THAT WE'VE KIND OF KIND OF DIGGING OURSELVES WHEN WE SAY THAT WHO IS RENAMING PLACES, OTHER PEOPLE WHILE ALIVE AND VARIOUS THE GYMNASIUM, YOU'RE STILL NAILING THAT BUILDING THE EARL CAMPBELL SO-SO.
SO ALL THE, SO I, I HEARD YOU SAY MR. SMITH AND, UM, YOU KNOW, AT THE SAME TIME THAT NAME CAN BE STRIPPED AND REMOVED FOR WAR POLICY.
IF THERE WAS SUCH A CIRCUMSTANCE THAT REQUIRED SUCH DRASTIC ACTION.
SO I PERSONALLY AM NOT IN AGREEMENT OF CHANGING THAT POLICY THAT YOU CAN NOT, IT SAYS ADJUNCT FACILITIES, INCLUDING ATHLETIC FACILITIES MAY BE NAMED OR INDIVIDUALS AS SPECIFIED IN DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS.
SO RACHEL, SHOULD WE JUST, DO YOU THINK WE SHOULD JUST SAY ADJUNCT FACILITIES, INCLUDING ATHLETIC FACILITIES, MAYBE NAMED FOR INDIVIDUALS AND KEEP UP AS SPECIFIED IN THE AR ISN'T THAT BEING, IS THAT OUR PRACTICE WHERE WE'RE NOT INCLUDING THAT? YEAH.
I DON'T THINK WE NEED TO INCLUDE THAT PART BECAUSE WE'VE ALREADY SAID ABOVE, UM, IN GC, WE TALK ABOUT THE COMPOSITION OF THE COMMITTEE THAT IT'S GOING TO REQUIRE A TWO THIRDS VOTE, UM, AND THINGS LIKE THAT.
AND I THINK THE, THE AR PRESENTLY LAYS OUT PRETTY SPECIFICALLY, IF WE WERE GOING TO NAME IT FOR SOMEONE LIVING WHAT THEY HAVE TO HAVE CONTRIBUTED OR WHAT CRITERIA THEY HAVE TO MEET, I DON'T THINK WE NEED TO GET INTO THAT.
SO TO, TO REVIEW ALL THIS RECOMMENDATION IS THAT OH, EIGHT POINT 10 SHALL READ THE SUPERINTENDENT SHALL ENSURE THAT ANY COMMITTEES APPOINTED TO RECOMMEND SCHOOL NAMES, I'M GOING TO SUGGEST THAT WE INCLUDE IN THEIR MASCOT DOOR, COLORS, UNDERSTAND THAT A FINAL APPROVAL OF SCHOOL NAMES, MASCOTS, AND COLORS AS A SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE BUFORD COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, B SCHOOLS MAY NOT BE NAMED OR LIVING INDIVIDUALS SAY ADJUNCT FACILITIES, INCLUDING ATHLETIC FACILITIES MAY BE NAMED FOR INDIVIDUALS LIVING INDIVIDUALS.
I THINK, UM, WHAT YOU'RE READING TRISHA RIGHT NOW IS COMING FROM THE CURRENT OH, E IS THAT CORRECT? RIGHT.
THEN DRAFT UP HERE, UM, A IS SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT.
UM, AND B IS NOT THE RIGHT B RIGHT BECAUSE WE'VE EVEN DOWN BELOW, I RECOMMEND YOU GETTING RID OF B, BUT NOW WE DECIDED TO KEEP IT.
SO YES, I'M GOING BACK TO THE ORIGINAL RIGHT NOW.
I LIKE THE SUGGESTED A HERE IN YOUR DRAFT, FINAL APPROVAL OF NEW OR REQUEST TO CHANGE SCHOOL NAMES, MASCOTS, OUR COLORS IS THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE BOARD PERIOD.
B SCHOOL MAY NOT BE NAMED FOR LIVING INDIVIDUALS.
YOU AGREE WITH THAT, RACHEL? YES, MA'AM.
[01:15:01]
FACILITIES, INCLUDING ATHLETIC FACILITIES MAY BE NAMED FOR INDIVIDUALS.SO DO WE NEED TO CLAIRE DO A, HAVE A CLARIFIER IN THEIR LIVING OR DECEASED? DOES IT MATTER JUST FOR LIVING INDIVIDUALS? OKAY.
AND THEN D IS THE ONE THAT I, I, UM, I'M RECOMMENDING WAY DELAYED, CAUSE I'VE ALREADY ADDED INTO, UM, DO YOU SEE THREE POINT 10? YEAH.
I MEAN, W WE ADDED THE, YOU KNOW, THE INTENT OF THAT RIGHT INTO JUICY THREE POINT 10.
SO YOU'RE SAYING SCHOOLS MAY NOT BE NAMED FOR LIVING INDIVIDUALS THAT IMPLIES THAT THEY CAN BE FOR PCC, RIGHT? CORRECT.
BUT THEN WHEN YOU SAY ADJUNCT FACILITIES MAY BE NAMED FOR LIVING INDIVIDUALS, BECAUSE THAT'S A POSITIVE, I MEAN, YOU DON'T HAVE A, NOT THERE ON THAT SENSE.
I THINK YOU THEN SHOULD JUST SAY THAT LIVING OR DECEASED MY RIGHT.
UM, IT'S JUST NOT AS CLEAR WE WANT TO BE IF WE WANT TO BE SUPER, SUPER CLEAR.
LIVING OR DECEASED INDIVIDUALS.
I JUST, SHE WAS DRESSED THE SAME.
SO, UM, THAT TAKES CARE OF GC THREE POINT A AND O EIGHT POINT 10, UM, ON THE AGENDA AND ALSO TALKS THAT WE ARE GOING TO HAVE A DISCUSSION ABOUT LOGOS.
AS WE ALL KNOW, FOR MONTHS, YOU KNOW, WE HAVE BEEN GRAPPLING WITH A CONCERN, UH, BROUGHT FORWARD TO US BY THE LOCAL COMMUNITY ABOUT THEY WANT TO USE THE TERM LOGO BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT I BELIEVE IT IS THE LOGO THAT IS ON THE FOOTBALL FIELD.
ALTHOUGH I WASN'T SURE THAT WAS THE PRIMARY PURPOSE IN THE BEGINNING.
I WASN'T SURE IT WAS JUST ALL ABOUT THE FOOTBALL FIELD.
I ASKED THAT QUESTION AND NEVER GOT AN ANSWER.
IT WAS JUST ABOUT THE FOOTBALL FIELD.
SO I THOUGHT IT WAS MORE ABOUT THE PRESERVATION OF THE HISTORY.
I THOUGHT IT WAS MORE ABOUT ME MAKING SURE THAT THE, UH, CURRENT STUDENTS AND FUTURE STUDENTS KNEW ABOUT THE HISTORY, THE AMAZING HISTORY, AND ABOUT THE, UM, AND INSURANCE THAT THE MASCOT STAYED THE EAGLE.
SO THAT WAS A PARTICULAR EXAMPLE.
SO BACK TO MORE GENERIC, A MASCOT, IN MY OPINION, IS THAT, WHICH IS DECIDED BY THE BOARD AFTER RECOMMENDATIONS FROM VARIOUS COMMITTEES NAMES, MASCOTS, I CALLED HERS.
A LOGO IS JUST A DEPICTION OF THAT MASCOT.
SO I'M GOING TO, I'M GOING TO BE SPECIFIC IF IT'S AN EAGLE, IT'S AN EAGLE.
AND SOMETIMES THE EAGLE LOOKS DIFFERENT THROUGHOUT, RIGHT THROUGHOUT THE YEARS.
AND THAT, YOU KNOW, AS A, AS THE LOGO DEPICTED DIFFERENTLY.
UM, SO I'D LIKE TO HEAR SOME OTHER THOUGHTS ON THE COMPARISON OF A MASCOT AND A LOGO, AND MAYBE WHAT POLICIES, IF ANY, SHOULD REGULATE LOGOS.
IF OTHER PEOPLE SEE IT AS A DISTINCTION.
DO YOU KNOW YOUR HANDS STILL UP? I'LL, I'LL DEFER TO THE COMMITTEE FIRST AND I'LL GO AFTER RACHEL YOU'RE YOU AND ME.
WE'RE THE COMMITTEE RIGHT NOW.
I THINK THE LOGO, UM, IS THE PURVIEW OF THE INDIVIDUAL PRINCIPAL AND, YOU KNOW, WHOEVER IS MAKING THAT DETERMINATION AT THE SITE.
I THINK WHAT WE HAVE CLARIFIED, I THINK TODAY IN OUR POLICIES IS THAT THE ACTUAL MASS STAT, WHETHER THAT'S A TIGER GAME COP OR WHATEVER, THE DEPICTION OF IT IS LEFT AT THE DISCRETION OF THAT FACILITY OR THAT SCHOOL, UM, I DON'T THINK THAT'S LOGOS REQUIRE APPROVAL BY THE BOARD.
I THINK IF WE GOT INTO DOING THAT, THEN WE'D BE DOING THAT
[01:20:01]
PERHAPS EVERY YEAR FOR 33 DIFFERENT FACILITIES.AND THAT'S A LOT AND FOR EVERY DIFFERENT SPORTS TEAM AND FOR WHEN I, WHEN I LOOKED UP, UH, LOGOS AND I'VE BEEN DOING THE RESEARCH ON IT, UM, YOU KNOW, LOGOS OF COMPANIES AND SO ON, LET'S TAKE STARBUCKS, FOR EXAMPLE, YOU KNOW, NO LOGO HAS CHANGED.
UM, YEAH, GOOGLE CHANGES ITS LOGO.
AND I THINK IN, IN, IN THIS CASE, AS DETERMINED BY THE RESOLUTION VOTED ON BY THE BOARD THE OTHER NIGHT, TUESDAY NIGHT, THE BOARD RECOGNIZES THAT THE MASCOT AT BUFORD HIGH SCHOOL FOR EXAMPLE, IS THE EVIL.
THE COLORS ARE GREEN AND WHITE.
AND AS LIKE YOU JUST SAID, RACHEL, THE POLICIES THAT WE ARE GOING TO PROPOSE TO THE BOARD THAT WE'VE JUST WORKED ON ARE GOING TO SUGGESTS THAT THE NAME MASCOT IN COLORS OF PURVIEW OF THE BOARD, BUT NOT THE LOGO LOGOS, THEN THE MYRIAD LOGOS, DANA, WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS EXACTLY WHAT TO DO? AND YOU UNDERSTAND THERE IS THAT JUST THE BASKET, LIKE YOU SAID, SOMETIMES IS EAGLE.
THERE ARE GOING TO BE DIFFERENT VOLVOS AND, UM, THOSE ARE GOING TO CHANGE.
AND IT'S NOT TO SAY THAT ONCE ELIMINATED OR DIVINITY GOING TO BE DIFFERENT ONES, ALL THESE COMPANIES DO NEED TO SAY THAT YOU P NEVER.
I MEAN, I THINK YOU SAID YOU ALWAYS HAVE TO BE IN ONE MODE, BE TRADEMARKED.
UM, THERE ARE SEVEN THINGS THAT, THAT, UM, I HATE TO ASK THEM ABOUT, ABOUT CHANGE, UH, CHANGE THE MIDDLE OR WHATEVER WE CALL IT.
FIRST OFF TO ME, IT'S NOT A LOGO.
AND WE'LL TALK ABOUT PEOPLE WHO ARE CHANGING.
THESE ARE COMPANIES, AUTOPSY ARE COMPANIES WHO CHANGE THEIR MODE, AS LONG AS IT'S NOT A LOGO.
THIS IS HOW YOU ENDED UP BY YOURSELF, NO DIFFERENT YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER.
YOU CAN'T JUST NOT AND CHANGE THEM.
I MEAN, TO MY KNOWLEDGE, THERE'S YOU, THERE'S, I'M SURE THERE'S A DIVERS WANTING TO DO THAT.
SO WE'RE SORT OF SAYING THAT WHEN YOU HAVE A BRAND IN THOSE COLORS WHO SHOULD DO CHANGE THEIR BRAND, OR THEY CHANGE THEIR LOCAL, THERE'S A REASON FOR THAT BECAUSE THEY'VE BEEN SUED OR THEY GOT IN TROUBLE OR SOMETHING, THIS TASTEFUL AS WELL, THAT BRAZIL, THEY'RE TRYING TO CHANGE THE IMAGE ON WHO THEY ARE OPEN WILL PROCEED THEM ADS.
SO WITH THE BRAND AND THE
SO, AND I'VE BEEN OUT IN
SO WHEN WE GET THIS CONVERSATION, ARE WE TALKING ABOUT SOME MORE STUFF? SO THEN WHY ARE THEY GOING TO CHANGE IT? WHY DO THEY NEED TO BRING IT, BRING IT, BRING IT BEFORE THE BOARD, EVERYTHING THAT WE SAID, AND THOSE LAST STEP THAT'S AS VALID BECAUSE IT'S NOT ALL THAT HALF OF THAT BUILDING AS THE PERSON WHO HAS THE AUTHORITY TO THEN IN THAT DAY, THAT THE BOARD GIVES THE SUPERINTENDENT AND THE SUPERINTENDENT GIVE THE AUTHORITY TO THAT ADMINISTRATOR TO BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR WHAT HAPPENS IN THAT HOUSE.
JUST BECAUSE YOU DID, BECAUSE WHEN YOU WOULD IN A HOUSE, WHEN YOU ARE IN YOUR HOUSE, YOU DON'T GO INTO
SO IT WAS, AGAIN, THE TAXPAYERS IN THIS INSTANCE, THEY ARE THE HOMEOWNERS.
SO WHY SHOULD WE ALLOW ONE PERSON OR GROUP OF PEOPLE TO GO IN THERE AND CHANGE STUFF UP? SO WE HAVE TO BE VERY CAREFUL ABOUT WHAT WE'RE SAYING HERE.
SO LET ME ASK YOU A BASIC QUESTION ARE LOGOS AND MASCOTS OF SAY THEY'RE DIFFERENT, RIGHT? LOGOS AND MASCOTS ARE DIFFERENT.
BRUDER, DO YOU HAVE YOUR DOCTORATE IN COMMUNICATIONS? WOULD IT INVOLVE SOME KNOWLEDGE OF MASCOTS AND LOGOS? AND COULD I PUT YOU ON THE SPOT AND ASK EUROPEAN COMMUNICATION WORLD THE LOGO CAN'T BE ADAPTED WITH A MASCOT SIX?
[01:25:01]
OKAY.THE LOGO CAN BE ADAPTED, BUT THE MASCOT, THE STAND TO SAY.
SO I THINK IT SOUNDS TO ME THAT UNDER THE PURVIEW OF THE BOARD, WHICH IS REALLY WHY WE'RE HERE, WHAT POLICY, I MEAN, SHOULD LOGO BEING ADDED TO ANY OF OUR POLICIES SMELL.
MY QUESTION IS, IS LOGO A PART OF THE STOOL, FIRSTLY, CREATING THE LOGO AS A PART OF DESCRIBING THE MASCOT AND WHO REGULATES THAT.
AND, UH, IN MY OPINION, THIS SITUATION KIND OF GIVES US CREDIBILITY THAT WE NEED TO DO MORE THAN JUST LET THE PRINCIPALS OR SCHOOLS AT THEIR OWN JUDGMENT CHANGE THAT MASCOTS THE PICTURE ANY WAY THEY WANT TO DO IT AND CALL IT A LOGO BECAUSE IT, OBVIOUSLY THE SITUATION JUST DIDN'T ARRIVE WITHOUT YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE THE SCHOOLS DO IT.
THEN, I MEAN, I'M USED TO GET A BUNCH OF THE PICTURE FROM ONE THING TO ANOTHER, IN TERMS OF WHAT THAT LOGO MIGHT SHOW, AND IT COULD GET VERY POLITICAL TERMS OF WHAT THAT LOGO MIGHT SHOW.
WE HAVE SOMEBODY HAVE TO REGULATE THAT YOU CAN'T MAKE OUT, ALWAYS PUT OUT THE FIRE AFTER THE STORM.
UH, YOU KNOW, BUT SOMEBODY HAVE TO REGULATE WHAT'S GOING ON IN THE SCHOOLS.
AND I'M IN THIS SITUATION, GOT TO THIS POINT BECAUSE NOBODY TO FIND HOW WE GOING TO UTILIZE THAT LOGO PER SE, IN TERMS OF USAGE AND HOW IT'S GONNA END UP WITH THE MASCOT AS USAGE AND FOLKS, DIDN'T GET THAT PLAYER CLARIFY.
THEN WE WENT ON AND DID SOME CHANGES IN THE BOARD SAYING IT'S ALL FOUL HANDS, BUT IT'S GOT THE COMMUNITY AND AN UPROAR ONE WAY OR THE OTHER, YOU KNOW, IT COULD BE BOTH WAYS, BUT IT'S GOOD THAT FOR OUR SAKE, THE OTHER PART OF IT IS PEOPLE ARE NOT REALLY TRYING TO PROTECT THAT, THAT LOGO CHANGE AS MUCH AS PEOPLE ARE TRYING TO KEEP IT FROM JANUARY.
BUT, UH, IN MY MIND, WE HAVE TO DO SOMETHING FROM A BOARD PERSPECTIVE TO REGULATE WHAT HAPPENS WITH THE, WITH THE LOCALS TOO.
AND I DON'T KNOW WHAT YOUR PROPOSAL IS, BUT EVERYBODY KNOWS THAT THE LOCALS, NOT THE SAME AS THE MASCOT.
I DON'T THINK THAT FOLKS WERE CONCERNED JUST ABOUT FOOTBALL OR SOMEBODY, AS YOU SAID, FALSE WORK BACK THAT IT WAS, WE, WE MAPPED NOW AT A PACE WHERE EVENTUALLY THE ORIGINAL EAGLE WOULD DISAPPEAR.
ALL OF THOSE, THE DOLLAR BILLS GOT A FEW OF THEM.
SO THAT'S LEGAL ON IT AND HAD ALL THE, ALL THE TIME.
I THINK THERE MIGHT BE A PIECE OF INFORMATION MAY OR MAY NOT BE A PIECE OF INFORMATION WE MIGHT NOT HAVE HERE.
AND THAT'S WHETHER OR NOT THERE'S CURRENTLY AN AR IN REGARD TO LOGOS.
I FEEL LIKE THERE MIGHT BE ONE BECAUSE A LOT OF OUR LOGOS KIND OF OVERLAP WITH UNIVERSITY TRADEMARKS OR OTHER NFL KIND OF TRADEMARKS AND THINGS LIKE THAT.
AND WE HAVE TO BE CAREFUL OF THOSE THINGS.
SO THERE MIGHT BE OTHER PIECES THAT WERE MISSING TO THIS CONVERSATION AND IF WENDY OR ANYBODY ELSE HAS ANYTHING ON THAT, THAT'D BE INTERESTING.
UM, WENDY'S INDICATING THAT THERE SHE IS NOT AWARE OF THERE, THERE IS AN A, UM, UH, THERE'S AN AI, UH, COPYRIGHTS AND THAT TYPE OF THING.
AND DOCTOR'S DESK EXPLAINING SOMETHING OUT HERE IS ANYTIME OF YARNING FACILITY BE CAREFUL BECAUSE OF RESEARCH.
I COULD NOT FIND ANY STATUTES THAT DEAL WITH THIS IN SOUTH CAROLINA, BUT IN LESS IN NEVADA AND A WHOLE MONTH IN VERY CAREFUL BALL AND GAME YOU CHOOSE BECAUSE ESPECIALLY THERE ARE A LOT OF FIVES THERE AND THOSE NAMES YOU'D HAVE TO BE VERY CAREFUL AND PICK A NAME.
CAUSE I DON'T, I DON'T REMEMBER SEEING ANY ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS.
I DON'T THINK THAT THERE'S A, OKAY.
SO I THINK IT KIND OF BOILS DOWN TO IS, IS A LOGO UNDER THE BOARD'S PURVIEW PER
[01:30:01]
POLICY.YEAH, I WAS GOING TO SAY, I THINK THAT, UM, MAYBE SOMETHING THAT COULD ADDRESS THIS, THAT ISN'T AS FIRM AS THAT THE BOARD HAS TO APPROVE EVERY LOGO OR THINGS LIKE, OR THOSE INDIVIDUAL CHANGES, BECAUSE LIKE I MENTIONED, THAT WOULD PROBABLY BE MUCH MORE FREQUENT THAN A NAME, COLOR OR MASCOT CHANGE.
UM, I THINK THAT PERHAPS WE DIRECT THE SUPERINTENDENT TO, UM, ADOPT AN AR THAT DOES ADDRESS THE PROCESS FOR LOGOS SO THAT THERE IS UNIFORMITY SO THAT THERE IS A PROCESS.
UM, AND THEN THAT'S CERTAINLY WITHIN OUR PURVIEW AS A BOARD TO SAY, THE SUPERINTENDENT NEEDS TO CREATE NAR THAT THE SCHOOLS HAVE TO OPERATE UNDER, REGARDING LOGOS.
I THINK THAT'S A, THAT'S A EXCELLENT IDEA.
BUT WITH THE BOARD TO APPROVE THE LOGO NOW, I DON'T THINK SO THINGS TO BE A PROCESS THAT'S CLEARLY OUTLINED BECAUSE IF THERE'S NOT AN AR RIGHT NOW ON LOGOS AND LOGOS IS ONE OF THE ISSUES HERE, UM, THEN WE PROBABLY NEED ONE AND FORD IS WHO DIRECTS THE POLICY THAT THE AIRS ARE CREATED FROM.
SO, SO TINA, UM, CAN YOU TELL US ABOUT, I LOOKED THROUGH THE REAL POLICIES AND THEY ARE ALL THIS.
THERE'S NOTHING ADDRESSING LOGOS.
AND I THINK RACHEL IDEAS CONCUR WITH THAT TOO.
I THINK IF THE WORK IS INTO IMPROVING EVERY LOGO, BUT THAT'S GOING TO BE OUR, OUR BUSINESS, YOU KNOW, EVERY SINGLE MEETING THAT'S THAT IT SHOULD BE A PROCESS IS CONSISTENT.
AND I DO THINK THAT SHOULD BE
UM, SO, SO THEY HAD THE, THE SILHOUETTE OF THE, UH, BOBCAT AS THEIR KIND OF MAIN LOGO, BUT THEN THEY HAVE LIKE CLAWS.
THEY HAVE BEES, FOR EXAMPLE, THAT ARE GREEN AND BLACK ON THE, UM, ON BASEBALL HATS.
AS I RECALL, THEY HAVE, UH, UH, LIKE CROSS-COUNTRY HEAD, THE COLORS ARE, ARE GREETED IN WHITE.
THERE'S A LOT OF BLACK MIXED IN, YOU KNOW, THERE'S A LOT OF VARIETY AND SEEDS AND I DON'T KNOW EACH OF THOSE LOW-DOSE PER SE.
MY TWO KIDS GRADUATE FROM HIGH AND NEAR YET EXAMPLES OF DIFFERENT DEPICTIONS OF GAY PEOPLE.
THERE'S ALWAYS AN EQUAL, UM, VALID YOUR HAND UP AGAIN.
I CONFER WITH RACIAL THAT WE NEED TO ESTABLISH SOME TYPE OF SUPERINTENDENT DIRECTION SO THAT THERE IS PARAMETERS IN TERMS OF THE USE OF LOGOS.
I SAID, WHEN I SAID EARLIER LOGOS TO GO ASTRAY IN A HURRY, AND ALL OF A SUDDEN YOU DON'T RECOGNIZE WHAT THE MASCOT IS, BUT TOP OF THAT, IT COULD UNDERMINE THE ORIGINAL INTENT OF THE MASCOT.
SO YEAH, WE, I THINK WE DO NEED TO PUT SOME THINGS IN PLACE.
WELL, THE THING THAT HAPPENED AT BUFORD THAT DOESN'T HAPPEN AGAIN WITHOUT AT LEAST THE SUPERINTENDENT FULLY AWARE OF THE CHANGES THAT WERE MADE.
I MEAN, UH, I THINK THE HILTON HEAD HIGH WAS PROBABLY THE FIRST SCHOOL THAT STARTED SHIFTING THE LOGO.
AND THAT HAPPENED WAY BACK IN THE NAMES LOGOS.
AGAIN, THE CHANGE CHANGES HIS OUTLOOK ON THAT OLD TIRED, SEE HALL TO UPSCALE, SEE HOW THAT WAS CRASHING TWO BLOCKS AND THAT, THAT LED TO SOME CONTROVERSY.
BUT THEN WE THOUGHT GETTING A LITTLE BIT MORE CEREBRAL LOOKING C HALL, BUT NONE OF IT WAS VETTED TO ANY DEGREE BY THE BULL.
BUT BOTTOM LINE IS NOBODY KNOWS WHAT THE C HALL REALLY LOOKS LIKE NOW, BUT THERE ARE STILL SOME OLD CEO, UH, ILLUSTRATIONS OUT THERE THAT SOME PEOPLE STILL USE IT, BUT IT'S SHIFTED QUITE A BIT OVER.
AND I DON'T THINK IT HAS THE HISTORY THAT YOU, I ASKED
[01:35:01]
SO PEOPLE DIDN'T FIGHT IT AS MUCH.SO THAT'S THE REASON WHY WE NEED SOMEBODY TO MONITOR THE TEAMS AS ANY PRINCIPALS CAN COME IN AT ANY TIME AND DO WHAT HE WANTS TO DO WITH LOGOS.
AND THAT'S NOT FAIR TODAY'S THROUGH.
SO RACHEL, I THINK THAT WAS AN EXCELLENT SUGGESTION.
IF I MAY MAKE A MOTION SHORT PLACE, NO, EXCUSE ME.
SHE'S WE'VE GOT TO WRAP THIS UP.
SHE'S A COMMITTEE NUMBER WHEN WE GET THE FLOOR.
SO I'LL COME BACK TO YOU BECAUSE THERE'LL BE A DISCUSSION.
RACHEL, MADAM CHAIR, I MOVE THAT THE POLICY COMMITTEE RECOMMEND THE CREATION OF O E EIGHT 11.
AND I'LL YOU WANT ME TO PUT IT IN THE CHAT ROBIN? WHAT'S EASIER.
SO WHILE YOU'RE DOING THAT, YEAH.
WELL, I MEAN,
IF TWO WEEKS IS REASONABLE, BECAUSE OBVIOUSLY THE PROTOCOL ALLOWS THEM TO MAKE ALL THOSE CHANGES.
AND AS LONG WE'RE GOING TO, BECAUSE IT TOOK, IT TOOK THE ORIGINAL ORDERS.
NOW THE ORIGINATION OF ALL OF IT, BUT IT ALSO TOOK THE DEFINITION OF WHAT IT STOOD FOR.
THE MDB EMMYLOU IT'S ENTERED INTO, UH, THE DEFINITION FROM OFF OF WHAT HE STOOD FOR.
YOU MAY, IT MAY HAVE TO BE A CARTOON CHARACTER.
IT DOES NOT SOLVE OUR PROBLEM.
AND JUST HEARING OUT WHAT WE WAS TAUGHT.
I DON'T CARE IF WE ASK THEM TO SIGN UP FORM, THEN WE HAVE TO COME HERE AND MEET EVERY WEEK.
HELL, THAT'S WHAT WE SIGNED UP FOR.
WE HAVE TO COME IN AND DO THAT.
SO IT, EVERY TIME IT CHANGES THEM TO BRING FORTH THE NECK, THEN THAT'S OUR JOB.
THAT'S WHAT IT SOUNDED LIKE MORMONS.
SO MAYBE SOME OF US, IT'S NOT THE RIGHT THING.
I MEAN THAT OUR JOB IS TO ENSURE THOSE THINGS AS WELL.
AND I'M A LITTLE FRUSTRATED RIGHT NOW, BUT NOW THAT'S, THAT'S TRUE.
WE'LL BE RIGHT BACK WHERE WE STARTED FROM.
SO, SO DOING THIS, IT DOESN'T NO, NO, NO JUSTICE, AS LONG AS THIS, NOT THE OPTIMISM THAT WE, THAT, THAT WE ARE MAKING SURE THAT WHAT HAPPENED DOES NOT HAPPEN IN DOING THIS.
I'M NOT SURE THAT THAT, THAT, THAT HAPPENING AGAIN.
UM, THE ONLY RESPONSE I WOULD HAVE TO THAT IS IN THE ABSENCE OF ANY DIRECTION ON HOW TO DETERMINE A LOGO, PROVIDING DIRECTION ON EXACTLY HOW TO DO IT WILL PERHAPS KEEP THIS FROM HAPPENING AGAIN, BECAUSE, BECAUSE WILLIAM, THERE HAS BEEN NO PROCESS THAT A PRINCIPAL COULD SAY, OKAY, HERE'S, HERE'S AN AR ON HOW TO GO ABOUT A, OH, I HAVE TO DO THIS.
SO, SO I JUST RESPECTFULLY DISAGREE THAT BY NOW HAVING A PROCESS BY WHICH A PRINCIPAL HAS TO FOLLOW TO CHANGE OR TO APPROVE A LOGO, IT CERTAINLY COULD MAKE A DIFFERENCE.
THAT'S NOT WHAT I GOT, BUT SHE SAID IT SHOULD NOT COME TO THE BOARD.
WHEN SHE FIRST SAID IT, SHE SAID, IT MAKES THE LOGO ON OR WHATEVER.
SHE SAID THAT SHE'D HAVE TO COME TO THE BOARD.
OKAY, RACHEL, ARE WE READY? YES, MA'AM I PUT IT IN A CHAT, BUT I'LL, I'LL READ IT REAL QUICK.
UM, I MOVED THAT THE POLICY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS TO THE BOARD, THE FOLLOWING CHANGE O E EIGHT 11 TO STATE QUOTE, SHALL ENSURE THAT DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS REGARDING CREATION OR CHANGES TO SCHOOL, LOGOS AND CRESTS ARE OUTLINED MONITORED AND FOLLOWED AND MOVE THE CURRENT O E EIGHT 11 TO BE AN OH EIGHT 12.
UM, SO BASICALLY WHAT THIS IS SAYING IS THAT THE SUPERINTENDENT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING SURE THAT THERE IS A PROCESS REGARDING LOGOS AND OR CRESTS.
CAUSE I KNOW THERE'S PRESS, I THINK MAYBE AT THE HIGH SCHOOL LEVEL, UM, UH, THAT THERE IS A PROCESS FOR IT.
IT'S OUTLINED IN AN AR BECAUSE PRESENTLY WE DON'T HAVE ONE THAT HE MONITORS IT AND THAT THOSE PROCESSES ARE CONSISTENTLY FOLLOWED.
I DON'T THINK THAT LOGOS NEED TO COME TO THE BOARD LEVEL, BUT I DO THINK THAT WE NEED TO HAVE A POLICY THAT DICTATES THERE'S AN AR FOR THIS, AND THAT'S, WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN IN THE FUTURE.
ANY MORE DISCUSSION, VAIL, DID YOU WANT TO COMMENT ON THIS? I KNOW YOU ALREADY SUPPORTED THIS ANYWAY DEVELOPMENT.
IT CHANGES THE SYSTEM AND HOW THE, HOW
[01:40:01]
THEY ADVERTISE THE SCHOOLS AS BECOMING A BIGGER, BIGGER PART OF THINGS AND EDUCATED SO WE CAN REGULATE IT.UM, RACHEL, HOW ABOUT A MOTION FOR THE OTHER CHANGES THAT WE DISCUSSED REGARDING GC 3.8 EMOTION FOR THAT TO BRING TO THE FULL BOARD AS WELL AS THE CHANGES FOR E EIGHT 10? YES MA'AM.
SO I MOVED THAT THE POLICY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS TO THE BOARD, THE PROPOSED CHANGES TO O E EIGHT, 10 GC, 3.8.
SO WE NEED TO PUT WITH THE ADDITION OF GC 3.9, THREE POINT.
MA'AM WITH THE ADDITION OF GC 3.9, NINE AND 10.
AND I'LL SET IT UP AND I JUST NEED TO SEE IT AND FINAL AND THEN IT CAN YEP.
I SECOND THAT, SO ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR? AYE.
UM, WE CAN TALK ABOUT A FUTURE MEETING DATE AT A LATER TIME.
SO A MOTION TO ADJOURN, SO MOVED.
THANK YOU EVERYBODY FOR YOUR INPUT.