Feb 02, 2022 Town of Bluffton Historic Preservation Commission

SO WE'RE LOOKING FOR AN ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA AS WRITTEN, AND I'M LOOKING TO ADOPT THE ATTENDANCE WRITTEN.

IT LOOKS LIKE WE HAVE THE PROPER QUORUM NOW.

AND NEW SECOND, THANK YOU.

ANY DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR, AYE.

ANY OPPOSED? UH, THE AGENDA IS ADOPTED ADOPTION OF MINUTES.

[VI. ADOPTION OF MINUTES]

AND WE'RE GOING BACK TO THE OCTOBER SIX MINUTES.

THE REASON WE'RE DOING THAT IS BECAUSE WE NEVER HAD THE PROPER FORUM TO ADOPT THAT.

NOW IT LOOKS LIKE WE DO.

IS THAT CORRECT? VERY GOOD.

SO THE FOLKS THAT WERE HERE FOR THE OCTOBER 6TH, COULD I GET A MOTION TO ADOPT THE MINUTES? I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO ADOPT THE OCTOBER 6TH, 20, 21, MANY MEETING MINUTES.

AND CAN I GET A SECOND FROM THE PEOPLE THAT WERE HERE AND I'M NOW LOOKING FOR A VOTE FOR THE FOLKS THAT WERE HERE, LIKE IT WAS UNANIMOUS, IS THAT CORRECT? SO THE MINUTES FOR OCTOBER SIX HAVE BEEN ADOPTED AND WE DON'T HAVE TO SEE THAT ON OUR AGENDA.

AND YOU LOOKS LIKE WE'RE LOOKING ALSO FOR ADOPTION OF MINUTES FOR THE JANUARY 5TH MEETING.

UM, SEE, WE NEED A MOTION FOR THAT.

AND YOU WERE HERE PROPER, CHRIS.

LOOKING FOR A SECOND ON ANY DISCUSSIONS ALL IN FAVOR.

AND THE RENOVATION FOR THE RATE AND A POTENTIAL CONTRACTOR COMING BUILDING, WE'LL STILL HAVE A CALL I'M AVAILABLE.

ANY OPPOSED? JANUARY 5TH MEETINGS ARE ADOPTED PUBLIC COMMENTS FOR ITEMS, NOT ON THE AGENDA.

IS THERE ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS FOR NONE ON THE AGENDA? AND NOW WE'RE WE DON'T HAVE ANY OLD BUSINESS AND WE HAVE A RICHARDSON WITH US.

WE HAVE KEVIN WITH US.

IT LOOKS LIKE WE HAVE THE BIRTHDAY BOY WITH US AND SEE CHARLOTTE AND CARRIE.

HELLO, THANK YOU, CARRIE.

AND

[IX.1. Certificate of Appropriateness: A request by Pearce Scott Architects, on behalf of the owners Rusty Pistachio & Debbie Wunder, for approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness to allow the renovation to, and addition of approximately 528 heated SF and 315 unheated SF to the existing 1,138 SF structure, and construct a 452 SF Carriage House to be located at 41 Bridge Street, in the Old Town Bluffton Historic District and zoned Neighborhood Conservation-HD. (COFA-11-21-016079) (Staff- Katie Peterson)]

IT LOOKS LIKE YOU'RE UP.

SO TONIGHT GUYS, BEFORE US, WE HAVE THE, UM, A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS TO ALLOW THE RENOVATION TO AN ADDITION OF APPROXIMATELY 528 SQUARE FEET AND 315 UNHEATED SQUARE FEET TO AN EXISTING 1,138 SQUARE FOOT STRUCTURE.

UM, AND THEN A 452 SQUARE FOOT CARRIAGE HOUSE TO BE LOCATED AT 41 BRIDGE STREET IN THE OLD TOWN, BLUFFTON HISTORIC DISTRICT, WHICH IS THE NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION HD.

WE DO HAVE PLENTY OF PEOPLE HERE ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT, UM, IN THE FRONT ROW HERE, WE'VE GOT RUSTY WHO IS THE PROPERTY OWNER, AS WELL AS AMANDA FOR THE APP, THE ARCHITECT, UM, BECAUSE OF OUR SEATING SITUATION TONIGHT, UM, I'M NOTING THAT THEY ARE HERE.

WE'LL INVITE THEM UP TO SPEAK AT THE PODIUM.

WHEN WE, AND JUST TO NOTE ALSO WE HAVE SOMEBODY THAT RECUSED THEMSELVES.

I BELIEVE THAT I NEED TO RECUSE MYSELF AS WELL, JUST DUE TO MY RELATIONSHIP WITH A FORMER CONTRACTOR

[00:05:01]

UM, I'VE BEEN SAYING THAT'S PROBABLY WHY IT'S JUST OUT OF AN ABUNDANCE OF CAUTION.

THE MOST IMPORTANT THING TO DO IS AS WE, UH, AND Y'ALL CAN COORDINATE WITH CARRIE, BUT MAKE SURE THAT YOU GET YOUR CONFLICT OF INTEREST FORMS NOW, SO THEY CAN BE INCORPORATED WITHIN THE MINUTES, BUT JUST FOR THE RECORD, THAT'S, UH, COMMISSIONER SIMPSON AND, AND, UH, COMMISSIONER SMELTER WHO ARE RECUSING THEMSELVES DUE TO POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF VETERAN.

AND IT LOOKS LIKE WE STILL HAVE A CORUM WITH THOSE REFUSALS.

IS THAT CORRECT? THANK YOU.

ALL RIGHT.

SO, UM, THANK YOU.

AND YEAH, IF WE DO NEED TO RECUSE OURSELVES, I THINK WE NEED TO GET THOSE FORMS IN PRIOR TO, SO WE HAVE THE ABILITY TO ADOPT OR ADAPT IF NEED BE.

SO, UM, THEY'RE NOT BEING PROPOSED TO CHANGE ANYTHING ABOUT THAT.

UM, SO THE LOCATION OF THIS, YOU ARE ALL FAMILIAR WITH IT.

UM, TOWN HALL IS, UH, BASICALLY JUST ACROSS THE STREET HERE OVER ON THE, OFF THE PICTURE HERE.

THIS IS THE RATE AT THE CORNER OF BOUNDARY AND BRIDGE HERE.

AND RIGHT NEXT DOOR IS THE PERSON WE'RE TALKING ABOUT, WHICH IS 41 BRIDGE STREET.

IT IS HERE IN THE GOLDEN ROD, WHICH IS THAT NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION HD ZONING DISTRICT.

SO IT IS NOT THE RIVERFRONT EDGE, BUT THE NEXT ZONING DISTRICT IN, UM, AND THIS IS A PSEUDO ACCURATE PICTURE OF THE EXISTING CONDITIONS.

UM, THE LANDSCAPE IN FRONT OF IT CHANGES ALL THE TIME, A LITTLE BIT, AND THIS WAS TAKEN FROM GOOGLE, GOOGLE MAPS TODAY BECAUSE, UM, I, MY PICTURE WAS BLURRY.

SO HERE IS THE SITE PLAN.

SO AGAIN, YOU CAN SEE THE RATE ON THE PROPERTY NEXT DOOR, AND THIS IS THE PARCEL THAT WE ARE SPEAKING TO TONIGHT.

THE ADDITION IS IN THE SHADED GRAY AREA WITH THE CARRIAGE HOUSE BACK HERE ALSO PROPOSALS NEW.

IT'S A LITTLE HARD TO SEE ON THE BIG SCREEN.

IT'S EASIER ON YOUR LITTLE SCREENS THERE.

UM, THE CONTRAST IS A LITTLE FUNKY AND THEN HERE IS A ZOOM IN OF THAT.

SO YOU CAN SEE IT A LITTLE BETTER.

THIS PORTION IS THE ADDITION PROPOSED AS WELL AS THIS PORTION HERE AND THE CARRIAGE HOUSE TOWARDS THE REAR OF THE PROPERTY.

SO BRIDGE STREET RUNS ALONG THE TOP OF THE SCREEN HERE.

THESE ARE THE EXISTING ELEVATIONS.

SO YOU'VE GOT TO JUST A VERY SIMPLE RECTANGULAR STRUCTURE WITH A GABLE FORWARD FACING GABLE ROOF.

AND IT HAS THOSE BIG STOREFRONT WINDOWS ON THE FRONT.

AND THEN THERE IS A, UM, METAL AWNING HERE THAT IS A FLAT AWNING AT THE FRONT.

THOSE ARE THE MOST NOTABLE CHARACTERISTICS OF THIS STRUCTURE.

HERE IS YOUR EXISTING FLOOR PLAN AND THEN THE PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN.

SO YOU CAN SEE THE PRIMARY STRUCTURE REMAINS MOSTLY UNCHANGED HERE.

UM, THE LAYOUT OF THE LITTLE ROOMS INSIDE DOES CHANGE A LITTLE BIT, BUT WITH THE ADDITION TOWARDS THE REAR OF IT, AS WELL AS TO THE LEFT SIDE, THEN YOU CAN SEE THE ROOF HERE AS WELL.

SO THEY'RE PROPOSING TO REPLACE THE ROOF, BUT KEEP IT AT THE SAME SLOPE.

ADD IN THESE, UM, SMALL, I CALL THEM SUNROOFS, BUT I KNOW THAT'S WRONG SKYLIGHTS.

THERE WE GO.

AND THEN, UM, THE ADDITION HERE AT THE REAR, AS WELL AS THE SHED ROOF PORCH ON THE LEFT SIDE AGAIN, SO YOU CAN SEE IT HERE.

I'VE PUT IN THE CORNER, A TINY LITTLE PICTURE OF WHAT THE CURRENT ELEVATION IS JUST TO MAKE IT A LITTLE EASIER AS WE FLIP THROUGH IT HERE.

AND THE APPLICANT HAS PROVIDED THE RATE, WHICH IS THE NEXT DOOR CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE ON THE FRONT ELEVATION, JUST SO THAT YOU HAVE AN IDEA OF WHAT THE SCALE OF THESE STRUCTURES NEXT TO EACH OTHER WILL LOOK LIKE.

AND CURRENTLY DOES LOOK LIKE.

UM, SO CURRENTLY IT LOOKS LIKE THIS WITHOUT THIS GUY AND PROPOSED, IT WILL INCLUDE THAT.

SO, UM, IT IS NOT CHANGING THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE STRUCTURE TO THE RATE, WHICH IS THE CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE NEXT DOOR.

UM, AND IT'S JUST IN THE STAFF REPORT.

IT HAS BEEN NOTED, BUT JUST TO NOTE, THIS IS NOT A CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE.

HOWEVER, THEY HAVE STARTED THE PROCESS TO REQUEST THAT IT IS CONSIDERED TO BE A CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE.

SO WHEN WE DID THE REVIEW FOR THIS, UM, WE WERE SURE THAT THE CHANGES THAT WERE BEING PROPOSED WOULD NOT, UM, CONFLICT WITH THE ABILITY TO CONTINUE THROUGH THAT PROCESS.

UM, SO THEY WERE VERY CONSIDERATE OF THE EXISTING STRUCTURE WHEN THEY PROPOSE THESE CHANGES TO IT.

YOU HAVE THE REAR ELEVATION, THIS IS WHERE YOU SEE THE LARGEST CHANGE BECAUSE YOU HAVE THIS, UM, NEW ADDITION TO THE REAR.

IT'S GOING TO HAVE THE WHORES.

LET ME TRY AGAIN, VERTICAL, UM, HARDIE SIDING HERE, A WINDOW THAT IS NOT THE EXACT SAME, BUT MIRRORS THE SAME SHAPE AS THE ONES ON THE FRONT.

AND THEN YOU CAN SEE THE ADDITION ON THE SIDE HERE TYING INTO THE ROOF LINE.

UM, THIS ROOF LINE OF THE ADDITION SITS BELOW THE EXISTING ROOF LINES SO THAT IT'S NOT VISIBLE FROM THE STREET.

AND THEN YOU HAVE THE RIGHT ELEVATION.

UM, SO THIS IS THE ADDITION TOWARDS THE REAR.

THE MOST OF THE RIGHT SIDE REMAINS UNCHANGED.

THEY ARE PROPOSING TO REMOVE, THERE ARE SOME METAL BARS ON THESE WINDOWS HERE THAT ARE EXISTING WINDOWS, UM, IN THE STRUCTURE.

SO THEY ARE HORIZONTAL, BUT THEY'RE EXISTING.

[00:10:01]

BESIDES REMOVING THESE SAFETY BARS, YOU CAN SEE THEM UP IN THE LITTLE SCREEN HERE.

UM, AND THEN THIS IS THE PROPOSED LEFT ELEVATION, WHICH DOES HAVE SOME CHANGE TO IT, BUT IT IS AGAIN SYMPATHETIC TO THE STRUCTURE ITSELF.

UM, IT IS PUTTING THESE THREE NEW OPENINGS IN AND FILLING IN FILLINGS THE WINDOW THAT'S HERE AND ADDING A PORCH TO THE SIDE.

YOU CAN SEE THE LITTLE SKYLIGHT UP IN THE ROOFLINE THERE, UM, WHICH IS LOW PROFILE AND WOULD NOT BE VISIBLE FROM MOST PEOPLE'S STREET PERSPECTIVE.

MAYBE SOMEBODY'S VERY, VERY TALL IS IT'S A SHORT STRUCTURE.

AND THEN YOU'VE GOT THE LARGER WINDOWS THAT KIND OF REFLECT THE SAME AS THE FRONT ON THE NEW ADDITION TOWARDS THE REAR.

THEY HAVE PROVIDED US WALL SECTIONS HERE THROUGH THE, UM, EXISTING STRUCTURE AND THE NEW STRUCTURE AS WELL AS THE PORCH.

AND IT KNOWS I LIKE ALL OF THE SECTIONS.

AND THEN YOU'VE GOT YOUR ADDITIONAL DETAILS HERE, ALONG WITH THE SERVICE YARD I'M GOING QUICKLY THROUGH, BUT I AM HAPPY TO GO BACK AND THEN YOU HAVE YOUR ADDITIONAL DETAILS, MORE ADDITIONAL DETAILS.

I LABELED IT MORE, EVEN AT THE TOP FOR ALL OF THE WINDOWS AND DOORS.

AND THEN THIS IS THE PROPOSED CARRIAGE HOUSE.

SO THIS IS THE ROOF PLAN, AS WELL AS THE FLOOR PLAN ON THE RIGHT-HAND SIDE HERE.

AND YOU CAN SEE HERE IS THE ELEVATION THAT WOULD FACE BRIDGE STREET.

IT WOULD NOT ACTUALLY BE LIKE FRONTING REGISTRY BECAUSE IT'S TOWARDS THE VERY REAR OF THE PROPERTY AND SITS DIRECTLY BEHIND THE EXISTING STRUCTURE.

SO, UM, WHILE IT FACES BRIDGE STREET, IT'S NOT TRULY FACING BRIDGE STREET.

THIS IS THE REAR ELEVATION AS WELL AS THE RIGHT AND LEFT ELEVATIONS.

SO THE LEFT ELEVATION HAS A SMALLER PIECE HERE.

YOU CAN SEE OFF TO THE SIDE.

IT DOES HAVE JUST THAT SHED, UM, A FAIRLY STRAIGHTFORWARD, SIMPLE STRUCTURE WITH THE SIDING THAT REFLECTS THE SIDING AND WINDOWS THAT REFLECT THE NEW ADDITION TO THE REAR OF THE STRUCTURE RATHER THAN THE BRICK, WHICH IS, UM, KIND OF, UH, AN EXISTING, BUT NONCONFORMING WALL MATERIAL.

FOR THE MOST PART HERE IN BLUFFTON, WE DON'T HAVE MUCH CLAY HERE.

AND THEN A WALL SECTION FOR THAT CARRIAGE HOUSE HERE IS THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.

UM, SO YOU CAN SEE THEY'VE PUT IN THE FOUNDATION PLANTINGS UP TOWARDS THE FRONT.

THERE'S AN EXISTING TREE OUT HERE THAT THEY WORKED TO AVOID WHEN THEY WERE PLANNING THEIR SITE.

AND THEN YOU CAN SEE THE ACCESS FOR THE CARRIAGE HOUSE COMES ALONG THE SIDE OF THE BUILDING AND INTO THE GARAGE HERE.

THE HPC CONSIDERS THE EIGHT REVIEW CRITERIA, WHICH I FOUND IN SECTION 3 18, 3 OF OUR UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE.

WHEN THEY ASSESS I CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS APPLICATION AND ARE AUTHORIZED TO APPROVE THE APPLICATION IS SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT, APPROVE THE APPLICATION WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE APPLICATION IS SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT.

IF IT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE CRITERIA LISTED IN SECTION 3 18 3, UM, TOWN STAFF HAS FOUND THAT WITH A FEW CONDITIONS, IT WOULD BE ABLE TO MEET THOSE CRITERIA AND RECOMMENDS A APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS.

UM, AGAIN, THE APPLICANT IS HERE TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF THE PROJECT TONIGHT.

I CAN SAY THAT I HAVE RE RECEIVED, UM, IN BETWEEN WRITING THE STAFF REPORT AND THE PRESENTATION TONIGHT, UM, DOCUMENTATION WORKING TOWARDS ACCOMPLISHING THE LANDSCAPE PLAN, SHOWING THE CANOPY COVERAGE.

UM, I STILL NEED A LITTLE BIT OF INFORMATION ON THAT, BUT IT IS WORKING TOWARDS THAT AND THEY ARE, UM, VERY, VERY CLOSE TO ACTUALLY HAVING THAT CANOPY WITH THE EXISTING TREE COVERED THAT IS ON THE SITE.

UH, YOU CAN SEE IT HERE.

THERE IS, THIS IS A, I BELIEVE IT'S 38 INCH OAK TREE RIGHT HERE.

SO, UM, IT, THIS DOES NOT REPRESENT THE ACTUAL CANOPY OF THAT TREE.

THIS IS MUCH SMALLER THAN WHAT IS ACTUALLY EXISTING THERE.

UM, AND IT'S A FAIRLY SMALL SITE, SO THEY MAY NEED ONE ADDITIONAL TREE, BUT I'M STILL WORKING ON THOSE CALCULATIONS WITH AMANDA, THE FINISHED FLOOR HEIGHT, WE NEEDED A DETERMINATION ON THE APPROPRIATENESS OF THE FINISHED FLOOR HEIGHT, WHICH WOULD BE LESS THAN THREE FEET ABOVE GRADE, AS YOU ARE FAMILIAR, THIS STRUCTURE SITS CURRENTLY ON GRADE AS IT WAS CONSTRUCTED ORIGINALLY AS A COMMERCIAL STRUCTURE.

UM, AND SO IN ORDER TO MEET THAT FINISHED FLOOR HEIGHT, IT WOULD BE APPROXIMATELY HERE FOR THE NEW ADDITION.

UM, SO WE NEED AN, A DETERMINATION ON THE APPROPRIATENESS OF THAT BECAUSE IT DOESN'T SPECIFICALLY MEAN IT WAS A NOTE THAT IF ANYONE DOES MAKE A MOTION TO MAKE CONSIDERATION THAT THIS IS AN EXISTING LOCATION, UH, AS FAR AS PRECEDENT GOES AND EXISTING LOCATION, WE HAVE APPROVED THE WAIVER OF THAT, UH, REQUIREMENT.

SO IF SOMEONE'S SPEAKING ON EMOTION, IF THAT'S A DESIRE, PLEASE NOTE THAT.

AND THEN THE LAST ITEM THAT STAFF FOUND WAS THAT, UM, WE NEED ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SHOWING THE RECORDED ACCESS EASEMENT FOR ACCESS BEING PROVIDED TO SHOW US WHAT THAT IS.

SO THE ACCESS FOR THE CARRIAGE HOUSE AND THE PARKING FOR THIS SITE IS BEING TAKEN FROM THIS SIDE IN ORDER TO AVOID THE LARGE TREE AT THE FRONT OF THE LOT.

[00:15:01]

UM, AND IT'S ALSO USING A CURB CUT THAT'S BEING INCORPORATED WITH THE BRIDGE STREET STREETSCAPE THAT THE TOWN OF BLUFFTON IS CURRENTLY WORKING ON THIS PROPERTY IS OWNED BY THE SAME PERSON AT THIS TIME.

AND SO WE HAVE NO DOUBT THAT THAT IS SOMETHING THAT CAN BE, CAN BE ACHIEVED.

UM, WE JUST NEED THE DOCUMENTATION SUPPORTING IT.

YOU CAN HAVE PERMANENT EASEMENT WORK RECORDED.

SO THEREFORE IF IN THE FUTURE IN A HUNDRED YEARS FROM NOW IT'S SPLIT OR WHATEVER THAT PERMANENT EASEMENT IS THERE AND YOU'RE ABLE TO GET INTO THAT PROPERTY.

CORRECT.

SO, UM, AGAIN, I'VE RECEIVED A PORTION OF IT.

I HAVE NOT HAD A CHANCE TO, UM, READ EVERY LINE OF THAT DOCUMENT YET TO MAKE SURE THAT ALL OF THE LANGUAGES THERE THAT I NEED, UM, HOWEVER, THEY ARE IN THE PROCESS OF GETTING THAT.

SO IT IS A FAIRLY ADMINISTRATIVE, UM, CONDITION THAT IS FOUND.

AGAIN, WE HAVE THE APPLICANT HERE TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF THE PROJECT, IF YOU'D LIKE TO OPEN IT UP TO THEM, OR, UM, ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU HAVE, LET'S SEE THE PLATES, THE CONTAINER PLATES IT USED TO BE IN HERE.

I KNOW ME EITHER.

YES, YOU'RE, YOU'RE USED TO STANDING ON THE OTHER SIDE.

SO ANYWAY, UM, DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY DISCUSSIONS FOR THE APPLICANT OR THE APPLICANTS THAT ARCHITECT, AS FAR AS THE EASEMENT'S CONCERN, WE DO HAVE THE, UM, WRITTEN THE PAPERWORK FOR THAT.

WE'VE GIVEN YOU AN ALSO, IT'S ALL COORDINATING WITH THE TOWN OF BLUFFTON CAUSE THEY HAVE THEIR OWN STREETSCAPE.

SO WHENEVER THEY GIVE US INFORMATION, WE'LL HAVE IT.

BUT, UM, I THINK PAT EMAILED US SOMETHING LAST NIGHT OR LIKE FOUR.

SO WE'RE JUST WORKING WITH THE TOWN ON THAT.

IT'S DEFINITELY A RECORDED, WE WENT HERE.

WE'RE GOOD.

AND I JUST THINK THAT THE REUSE OF THIS IS PRETTY COOL.

IT'S JUST, I DON'T KNOW IF THAT'S PROPER TO SAY, BUT IT JUST SEEMS LIKE IT'S APPROPRIATE FOR THE AREA AND ALSO WHAT IS GOING ON.

SO THANK YOU FOR THE ATTENTION AND WE'RE EXCITED ABOUT IT AND GLENN'S BEEN HELPING US A LOT WITH IT.

SO WE'RE GOOD.

SO AGAIN, MY QUESTION ON THE PLATE STACKS, YOU KNOW, IT JUST SEEMS LIKE IT'D BE KIND OF FUN TO INCORPORATE THAT INTO LANDSCAPE, YOU KNOW, FROM THE EXISTING FOLKS, YOU KNOW, I DON'T, I WAS JUST GOING TO ASK HIM KIND OF ON GLEN'S EARLIER, UH, UM, KIND OF SOME OF HIS EARLIER COMMENTS, THE, CAN YOU TALK A LITTLE BIT JUST ABOUT THE, UH, PITCH OF THE ROOF AND ABOUT REALLY FOR ME, UH, LIKE WHAT IT IS NOW AND WHAT Y'ALL ARE PROPOSING FOR THE IT'S GONNA STAY THE SAME.

YEAH, THE SAME, THE SAME ERROR.

GOTCHA.

SAME CHARACTER OF WHAT IT IS NOW SITTING ON THE SAME PLATE, THE SAME KITCHEN.

IT'S JUST PUTTING, PUTTING LUMBER THAT ACTUALLY IS NOT ROTTED.

GOTCHA.

SO Y'ALL ARE MAINTAINING IT.

THAT'S AWESOME BECAUSE THAT IS ALSO A REQUIREMENT IF WE WANT TO GET ON THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF, OR BEYOND CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE.

SO THAT'S WHAT WE'VE BEEN WORKING WITH GLEN.

UM, SO WE'RE HOPING TO GET IT ON THE CONTRIBUTING RESOURCE LIST AND THEN GET IT ON THE NATIONAL LEVEL.

SO YEAH.

IT'S KIND OF A BIG DEAL.

YEAH, NO, THAT'S AWESOME.

THAT'S THAT EXTRA BEYOND, SO AGAIN, THANK YOU.

SO THAT'S WHY, LIKE THEY, WE'VE BEEN A LOT OF TALKS WITH THEM TO MAKE SURE WE'RE DOING IT PROPERLY AND WE'RE NOT BECAUSE BEFORE WE HAD THE ROOF RAISED AND THEY WERE LIKE, NO, NO, NO, IF WE WANT TO GO THIS ROUTE, YOU KNOW, LET'S MAKE SURE IT'S DOWN AT THE SAME LEVEL.

AND I'M JUST WANTING TO MAKE SURE WITH RUSTY AND DEBBIE THEIR VISION AND SEE WHAT ROUTE THEY WANT IT TO GO.

SO, SO JUST AS A NOTE, THAT'S JUST ABOVE AND BEYOND, CORRECT.

THEY DON'T NEED TO BE DOING THAT.

THEY DON'T HAVE TO RIGHT NOW BECAUSE IT'S NOT A CONTRIBUTING RESOURCE, BUT WANTED TO POINT THAT OUT.

BUT BECAUSE WE WANT IT TO BE, WE WANTED TO MAKE SURE AND TAKE EVERY STEP POSSIBLE TO ENSURE THAT POSSIBILITY.

AND SO THAT'S WHAT OUR HOPE IS.

GREAT.

AND THIS IS GOING TO BE YOUR, YOUR HOME.

PROVIDE A TREE CANOPY COVERAGE, UM, FOR, TO, UH, FIND THAT THE, UH, IT'S APPROPRIATE TO KEEP THIS, UH, BUILDING, UH, LEVEL, BECAUSE IT IS A COMMERCIAL EXISTING COMMERCIAL STRUCTURE AND THAT WOULD COMPLETELY LOSE THE CHARACTER.

I'M SORRY.

I'M NOT VERY GOOD WITH CANOPY COVERAGE.

I'M NOT A LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.

WE CAN HELP THEM OUT.

YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO JUST WITH AREA.

WELL, I HAVE NO OTHER COMMENTS.

I THINK IT'S A FANTASTIC PROJECT THEN USE FOR THE AND LOVE THAT IT'S BEING REHABBED AND, UH, CAN'T THINK OF A BETTER USE FOR THIS PARCEL.

UM, SO I'M READY TO SESSION.

UM, I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE APPLICATION, UM, UH, WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, JUST THAT, UH, NUMBER ONE, UH, PER STAFF'S COMMENTS THAT THEY

[00:20:01]

SO IT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE OR NOR IS IT APPROPRIATE TO RAISE IT THREE FEET IN THIS CASE.

AND, UM, JUST THAT THEY ALSO, UM, SUBMIT ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION ABOUT THE EASEMENT TO THE STAFF.

DO I HAVE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND.

IT, IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? NO DISCUSSION WITH THAT? UH, ALL IN FAVOR.

ANY OPPOSED? I, NO OPPOSED MOTION PASSES START CONSTRUCTING AGAIN, IT LOOKS LIKE OUR USERS ARE COMING BACK.

SO NEXT UP IT LOOKS LIKE WE HAVE BIRTHDAY PERSON WILL.

THIS IS A APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR THE DEMOLITION TO ALLOW FOR THE DEMOLITION OF, FOR NON-CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURES AND THE PARTIAL DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION OF A CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE KNOWN AS THE DEER TONGUE WAREHOUSE AT 1257 MIA RIVER ROAD.

IT'S ALWAYS NICE TO WORK ON MY THAT SO GOOD EVENING.

UM,

[IX.2. Certificate of Appropriateness - Demolition: A request by Witmer, Jones, Keefer, on behalf of the owner, Billy Waterson, for approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness (COFA)-Demolition to allow the demolition of four non-contributing structures of approximately 515 square feet, 525 square feet, 775 square feet, and 1,980 square feet, and the partial demolition and relocation of the Contributing Structure identified as the Deer Tongue Warehouse (demolition of approximately 2,045 square feet with relocation of the remaining 1,585 square feet) located at 1257 May River Road, in the Old Town Bluffton Historic District and zoned Neighborhood General-HD. (COFA-10-21-015994) (Staff - Glen Umberger)]

UM, I'M SURE MOST OF US IN BLUFFTON ARE WELL FAMILIAR WITH THIS, UM, STRUCTURE, UM, ON THE LOCATION MAP.

UM, UM, WE HERE HAVE IT LISTED.

UM, THE ADDRESS AT ONE POINT WAS 1255, BUT ACTUALLY IT'S NOW 1257.

THAT'S IN THE CENTER OF THE SCREEN.

UM, IT'S LOCATED IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD GENERAL HD ZONING DISTRICT, AS YOU SEE HERE ON THE ZONING MAP, UM, YOU'LL SEE ON YOUR SCREEN NOW, A SURVEY, WHICH IS A LITTLE HARD TO READ, BUT I'LL GIVE YOU THE HIGHLIGHTS AND THE NEXT SLIDE OF WHAT ACTUALLY IS GOING TO BE HAPPENING.

UM, THIS IS A SITE STRUCTURE INVENTORY.

UM, THE ELEMENTS IN RED ARE WHAT'S PROPOSED FOR DEMOLITION.

THE ELEMENT IN BLUE IS WHAT'S GOING TO BE REMAINING BEHIND, UM, THE HISTORIC STRUCTURE KNOWN AS THE DEER TONGUE WAREHOUSE IS STRUCTURE A, UM, THAT'S THE BLUE SECTION AT THE BOTTOM OR THE SOUTH SIDE OF THAT LARGER STRUCTURE.

UM, THE REST OF THE STRUCTURE MARKED A WILL BE THE PORTION THAT'S PROPOSED TO BE DEMOLISHED ALONG WITH STRUCTURES, B C, D, AND E.

UM, THE REMAINING BOX OF THE HISTORIC STRUCTURE IS PROPOSED TO BE RELOCATED ALONG THOSE DOTTED YELLOW LINES, UM, TO A LOCATION PROPOSED RELOCATION SITE IN THE BLUE DOTTED AREA.

UM, TO GIVE YOU A FAMILIAR REALITY WITH A SITE, UM, THIS IS STRUCTURE A OR THE CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE, UM, ON THE RIGHT-HAND SIDE IS THE HISTORIC PORTION OF THE STRUCTURE ON THE LEFT IS WHAT'S PROPOSED TO BE DEMOLISHED.

UM, THIS IS A ELEVATION OF STRUCTURE, B ELEVATION OF A STRUCTURE OF STRUCTURE C THE PEPSI COOLER IS NOT STRUCTURAL NOR CONTRIBUTING OR NON-CONTRIBUTING, UM, ELEVATION OF STRUCTURE D AND ELEVATION OF STRUCTURE E UM, SOME PHOTOGRAPHS AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION ABOUT THE, UM, CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE KNOWN AS THE DEER TONGUE WAREHOUSE.

UM, YOU PROBABLY, SOME OF YOU PROBABLY KNOW THIS BUILDING BETTER THAN I, UM, SO I WON'T SPEND A WHOLE LOT OF TIME ON IT.

UM, BUT I WANTED TO SHOW YOU SOME HISTORIC PHOTOGRAPHS BECAUSE AS A TRAINED ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIAN, THAT'S WHAT I LIKE TO SEE.

UM, THIS IS THE DEER TONGUE CIRCUIT, 1975 IN ITS OLD LOCATION NEAR CALHOUN STREET.

AND THIS IS ANOTHER, UM, IMAGE OF THE SAME STRUCTURE IN THE SAME LOCATION.

1983, HE GETS MOVED UP CALHOUN STREET, AND THIS IS A PHOTOGRAPH OF IT ON THE TRUCK GOING UP CALHOUN STREET, UM, BEFORE PERMITTING EXISTED, SEPTEMBER, 1990, THE STRUCTURE WAS MOVED ON THE MAY RIVER ROAD SITE.

UM, AND THIS IS, UM, BUILDING OUT THE WAY IT LOOKS CURRENTLY.

UM, THE BUILDING ACTUALLY WAS DOCUMENTED IN OUR VARIOUS TOWN OF BLUFFTON HISTORIC RESOURCE SURVEYS.

UM, THIS IS A PHOTOGRAPH FROM THE SEPTEMBER, 2001 SURVEY, UM, AN UPDATED IMAGE FROM THE JULY, 2008 SURVEY SHOWING PEPPER'S PORCH.

UM, THE LAST SURVEY WE HAD DONE, WHICH WAS JUST ADOPTED BY TOWN COUNCIL WAS DONE IN, IN 2019.

THIS WAS THE PHOTOGRAPH TAKEN IN MARCH OF THAT YEAR, SHOWING THE CURRENT STRUCTURE, UM, AT THAT POINT BEING VACANT, UM, I GAVE YOU IN YOUR PACKET AND THEN ALSO IN THE, IN THE STAFF REPORT,

[00:25:01]

SOME OF THE DETAIL OF THOSE DESCRIPTIONS FROM THE VARIOUS, UM, HISTORIC SURVEYS.

AND I WOULD LET TO TAKE THE TIME TO READ THROUGH THEM RIGHT NOW.

UM, BUT IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER THEM FOR YOU.

UM, TONIGHT WE ARE STILL DEALING WITH A NEW CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE DEFINITION.

THIS WAS PASSED BY TOWN COUNCIL IN DECEMBER EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1ST.

UM, THE STRUCTURED DEFINITION IS ALMOST THE SAME.

WE JUST TIGHTENED IT UP A LITTLE BIT TO COVER ANY FUTURE CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURES THAT WE MIGHT WANT TO BE ADDING TO THE, UM, STRUCTURE LIST.

WE REACHED OUT TO SOME OF THE VARIOUS PRESERVATION GROUPS IN TOWN.

THESE ARE SOME OF THE COMMENTS THEY HAD.

ALL OF THEM WERE ENTHUSIASTIC ABOUT, UM, THE POSSIBILITY OF HAVING THE DEER TONGUE WAREHOUSE, UM, RESTORED AND ADAPTED FOR A NEW USE, UM, MOVING FORWARD.

SO TONIGHT THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION HAS, UH, UM, CAN ACT, YOU CAN APPROVE THE APPLICATION AS SUBMITTED.

YOU CAN APPROVE THE APPLICATION WITH CONDITIONS.

YOU CAN DENY THE APPLICATION AS PER THE APPLICANT, OR SINCE THIS IS A DEMOLITION OR A PARTIAL DEMOLITION OF A CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE.

YOU ALSO HAVE THE OPTION TO POSTPONE IT.

DECISIONALLY APPLICATION FOR NO MORE THAN 180 DAYS TO DETERMINE IF AN, IF A ALTERNATIVE TO DEMOLITION EXISTS.

I HOPE THAT I CAN SHOW YOU TONIGHT THAT WE ALREADY HAVE AN, UM, AN ALTERNATIVE TO FULL DEMOLITION OF THE STRUCTURE.

UM, ACCORDING TO SECTION THREE POINT 18.4, UM, THIS IS WHERE YOU, THE SETS OUT THE GUIDELINES.

IF YOU DO WANT TO MAKE A DECISION TO POSTPONE FOR 180 DAYS.

SO WHEN LOOKING AT CRITERIA SET FORTH IN SECTION THREE POINT 18.3 OF THE UTO, UM, I WILL NOT GO THROUGH ALL THESE IN GREAT DETAIL.

I'LL JUST HIGHLIGHT A FEW OF THE ISSUES FOR YOU THERE ALSO IN THE STAFF REPORT.

UM, I WANTED TO POINT OUT HERE THAT THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE DEFINES A REHABILITATION, UM, AS THE PROCESS OF RETURNING YOUR PROPERTY TO A STATE OF UTILITY THROUGH A REPAIR OR ALTERATION, WHICH MAKES IT POSSIBLE AND EFFICIENT CONTEMPORARY VIEWS WHILE PRESERVING THOSE PORTIONS AND FEATURES OF THE PROPERTY, WHICH ARE SIGNIFICANT TO ITS HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL AND CULTURAL VALUES.

ACCORDINGLY, I BELIEVE THE DEMOLITION OF THE NON HISTORIC PORTION OF THE CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE AND THE RELOCATION AND REHABILITATION OF THE REMAINING HISTORIC STRUCTURE COMPLIES WITH THESE GUIDELINES SET FORTH BY THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE.

UM, IT'S ALSO, UM, THREE POINT 18.3 POINT B.

UM, IT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE OLD TOWN MASTER PLAN, UM, BECAUSE WE'RE DEMOLITION THE DEMOLITION OF THE NON HISTORIC PORTION OF THE CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE AND THE RELOCATION OF THE REMAINING HISTORIC DEER TONGUE WAREHOUSE ON ITS CURRENT LOT IN SUCH A MATTER AS THAT RETAINS ITS HISTORIC INTEGRITY THROUGH LOCATION DESIGN, SETTING, MATERIAL, WORKMANSHIP, FEELING AND ASSOCIATION IS CONSISTENT WITH THESE PRINCIPLES SET FORTH UNDER THE OLD TOWN MASTER PLAN.

UM, THREE POINT 18.3 POINT C.

UM, THE APPLICATION MUST ALSO CAN BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH APICAL PROVISIONS PROVIDED IN ARTICLE FIVE DESIGN STANDARDS.

AND HERE WE DO HAVE TWO DESIGN STANDARDS THAT WE NEED TO BE CONCERNED ABOUT, UM, WHEN YOU'RE RELOCATING THE, UM, UM, SINCE THE CONTRIBUTING RESOURCES WILL BE RE RELOCATED WITHIN THE HISTORIC DISTRICT.

UM, ACCORDING TO SECTION FIVE POINT 15.5 POINT F 0.5 POINT A, UM, THE FACADE OF THE CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE, ONCE IT'S MOVED MUST BE ORIENTED PARALLEL TO MAY RIVER ROAD.

UM, THE REQUIREMENT IS THAT NEW CONSTRUCTION BUILDINGS MUST BE PARALLEL TO THE STREET FACING SIDE.

UM, SO WE'RE GOING TO ASK THAT THE RELOCATION STRUCTURE FOLLOW THOSE RULES.

UM, IN ADDITION, ACCORDING TO SECTION FIVE POINT 15.5 POINT C, THE RELOCATED STRUCTURE MUST BE CITED 10 FEET FROM THE PROPERTY LINE ON THE WESTERN SIDE OF THE PROPERTY LINE, UH, WHICH IS WHAT WE WOULD BE CONCERNING IF IT WAS NEW CONSTRUCTION, UM, THREE POINT 18.3 POINT D UM, THE PROPOSAL TO DEMOLISH THE NON HISTORIC PROPORTION OF THE CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE AND RELOCATE THE EXTANT HISTORIC CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE ON THIS, ON THIS PRESENT LAW WILL SATISFY THIS CRITERIA, UH, REGARDING THE NATURE AND CHARACTER OF THE SURROUNDING AREA.

UM, THREE POINT 18.3 POINT E.

THIS DEALS WITH THE PRISON PRESERVING OF THE EXISTING BUILDINGS, HISTORIC CHARACTER AND ARCHITECTURE.

I'M GOING TO ARGUE THAT BY REMOVING THE NON HISTORIC PORTION OF THE BUILDING AND RELOCATING IT ON THE SITE ON THE SITE WILL ACTUALLY PRESERVE THE HISTORICAL CHARACTER AND THE ARCHITECTURE OF THE DEER TONGUE WAREHOUSE, UM, THREE POINT 18.3 POINT F UM, THE HISTORICAL ARCHITECTURAL AESTHETIC FEATURES OF THE STRUCTURE, INCLUDING THE EXTENT TO WHICH ITS ALTERATION OF REMOVAL WILL BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE PUBLIC INTEREST.

AND I SET FORTH IN THE STAFF REPORT AND HERE ON YOUR SCREEN, A RATHER LENGTHY NARRATIVE OF THE HISTORY OF THE BUILDING.

AGAIN, SOME OF YOU MIGHT BE MORE WELL ACQUAINTED THAN I AM.

UM, BUT, UM, I DO BELIEVE THAT THIS, UM, SECTION IS, IS MET BY THE APPLICATION.

[00:30:03]

UM, AND THEN THREE POINT 18.3 POINT G SUBSECTION ONE, UM, YOU KNOW, WE'LL SET FORTH A HISTORICAL OWNERSHIP AND USE, UM, AND THE RE REASON FOR REQUESTING DEMOLITION.

UM, AGAIN, A RATHER LENGTHY NARRATIVE ABOUT THE HISTORY OF THE BUILDING.

UM, I WILL NOT GO INTO GREAT DETAIL NOW, BUT IF YOU HAVE SPECIFIC QUESTIONS, I'LL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER THOSE.

UM, AND THEN INFORMATION THAT ESTABLISHES CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE THAT THE DEMOLITION OF THE STRUCTURES NECESSARY TO ALLEVIATE A THREAT TO PUBLIC HEALTH AND OR SAFETY, UM, IN THE PACKET THAT YOU RECEIVED THE PES REPORT FROM JANUARY 4TH, 2022, NOTED THAT THE CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE AND THAT'S THE PRO THE STRUCTURE THAT WE'RE MOST INTERESTED IN AT THE MOMENT.

THE DEAR CHUNG WAREHOUSE IS GENERALLY IN GOOD STRUCTURAL CONDITION.

AND PREVIOUS IN A PREVIOUS RESTORATION EFFORT HAS PROVIDED STRUCTURAL STABILITY TO THE BUILDING'S MAIN STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS.

THEY FEEL THAT THEY WILL BE ABLE TO MOVE THE BUILDING WITHOUT LOSING THE INTEGRITY OF THE STRUCTURE, WHICH IS GOOD NEWS FROM US FROM OUR STANDPOINT AND SUBSECTION B INFORMATION THAT ESTABLISHES CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE THAT NO REASONABLE ALTERNATIVES TO DEMOLITION EXIST.

UM, AND THEN WE BELIEVE THAT, OR THE ENGINEERING REPORT CONCLUDED THAT IT'S OUR PROFESSIONAL OPINION THAT IS FEASIBLE TO RELOCATE, AND REOCCUPIED THE EXISTING HISTORIC STRUCTURE WITH MINOR STRUCTURAL WORK TO BE ABLE TO ALLOW OCCUPANCY FOR COMMERCIAL PURPOSES AND SUBSECTION C INFORMATION THAT EXPLORES IS CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE THAT THE DENIAL OF THE APPLICATION AS A RESULT OF THE REGULARLY REGULARLY REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS OF THIS SECTION DEPRIVE THE APPLICANT OF REASONABLE ECONOMIC USE OR A RETURN OF THE PROPERTY.

UM, AS THE CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURES PROPOSED TO BE REHABILITATED FOR OTHER COMMERCIAL USES, THE PROPERTY OWNER WILL NOT HAVE, WILL NOT LOSE ECONOMIC USE AND RETURN ON THE PROPERTY.

AND THEN FINALLY, THE TOWN STAFF HAS DETERMINED THAT THE APPLICATION MEETS ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE APPLICATIONS MANUAL.

UM, WE DO HAVE, UM, THE AFRICAN HERE, IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR ME AT THIS POINT, THIS IS A REVIEW.

I KNOW THAT THERE'S OTHER PROPERTIES IN, UH, COULD YOU JUST RESTATE THE FACT THAT THEY ARE NOT CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURES ARE NOT CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURES, SO THEY'RE NOT, UH, ANY CONCERN.

AND I JUST WANTED TO RESTATE THAT, CAUSE THIS IS A FAIRLY BIG PLOT OF LAND.

WE ARE FOCUSING ON THE DEER TONGUE THAT'S RIGHT.

OKAY.

JUST SO EVERYONE'S AWARE OF THAT.

AND THE APPLICANT'S NARRATIVE.

THE OTHERS ARE NOT CONTRIBUTING AND IN MY OPINION, DO NOT MEET QUITE CURRENT CRITERIA FOR BECOMING CRITERIA OR CONTRIBUTING IN THE FUTURE.

THE APPLICANT HAS ANYTHING TO ADD.

NO, SIR, WE HAVE, WHILST MILLING, WE HAVE TWO, YOU DID A GREAT JOB.

I DON'T EVEN KNOW WHAT SHE'S DOING.

THAT'S WHAT I'M, I'M CONFUSED.

DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING TO ADD TO THIS? UH, IT'S GOING TO BE PARALLEL TO MAY RIVER IN REGARDS TO THE FRONT DOOR, 10 FEET.

UM, AND YOU'RE, YOU'RE MAINTAINING ALL THOSE WONDERFUL TREES.

YOU'RE NOT GOING TO BE KNOCKING THEM DOWN WHEN YOU'RE MOVING THE BUILDING OVER CLEAR PATH.

I'M EXTREMELY KNOWLEDGEABLE ABOUT THIS PROJECT.

I THINK I SAW SOME PICTURES OF YOU IN THERE.

IT DOES.

IT DOES HAVE A LOT OF HISTORIC SIGNIFICANCE, EVEN FOR SOME OF US WHO HAVE BEEN AROUND FOR PHOTOGRAPHS, BRING UP A LOT OF MEMORIES.

I KNOW THEY REALLY DO SO IT'S GOOD THAT IT'LL STILL BE AROUND AND IT'S STILL GOING TO BE A FUN PLACE TO, AND BE ABLE TO POP GEARS THERE AGAIN ONE DAY.

UM, ANY OTHER DISCUSSIONS OR COMMENTS, ANYONE SO THEREFORE, SO STAFF IS RECOMMENDING IN THIS CASE, UM, THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVED THE PARTIAL DEMOLITION OF THE NON HISTORIC PORTION OF THE APPROX OF APPROXIMATELY 2045 SQUARE FEET AND THE RELOCATION OF THE REMAINING APPROXIMATELY 1,585 SQUARE FEET OF THE CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE KNOWN AS THE DEER TONGUE WAREHOUSE TO THE WESTERN SIDE OF ITS CURRENT LOTS, SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS THAT WOULD BE ORIENTED PARALLEL TO THE MAY RIVER ROAD AND CITED 10 FEET FROM THE WESTERN SIDE PROPERTY LINE AND TOWN STAFF RECOMMENDS THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVED THE DEMOLITION OF THE FOUR NON-CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURES IDENTIFIED AS STRUCTURES, B D B, C, D, AND E.

I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT

[00:35:01]

WE APPROVE BASED ON STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS HALF SECOND, ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ALL IN FAVOR.

ANY OPPOSED PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.

THANK YOU, SIR.

VERY GOOD.

IT SHOULD BE A INTERESTING PROJECT TO WATCH.

I'LL BE EXCITED TO, YOU KNOW, IF YOU COULD POST, WHEN YOU'RE GOING TO MOVE, IT'D BE KIND OF FUN TO WATCH IT.

WE'LL HAVE A MOVIE PARTY.

OH, LET'S SEE.

ON OUR AGENDA.

IT LOOKS LIKE WE HAVE ANY DISCUSSIONS FROM ANYONE.

NO.

SO IT LOOKS LIKE I'M LOOKING FOR A, ANOTHER MOTION FOR WHAT THEY CALL A GERMAN.

IS THAT CORRECT? ANY PATIENTS WHO ADJOURN? YEP.

VERY GOOD.

I NEED A SECOND.

A SECOND, SECOND.

AND ANY DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR.