8. RECOMMENDATION OF AWARD FOR RFQ 060821 CONSULTING SERVICES TO PROVIDE AN EVALUATION AND STUDY OF ISSUES RELATED TO BEAUFORT COUNTY PUBLIC BOAT LANDINGS ($312,965.00)

[8. RECOMMENDATION OF AWARD FOR RFQ 060821 CONSULTING SERVICES TO PROVIDE AN EVALUATION AND STUDY OF ISSUES RELATED TO BEAUFORT COUNTY PUBLIC BOAT LANDINGS ($312,965.00)]

[Items 9 - 11]

[12. RECOMMENDATION TO AWARD RFQ #042721E, INDOOR POOL RENOVATIONS ARCHITECTURE AND ENGINEERING SERVICES (> $1,000)]

[13. DISCUSSION ON FINANCING FOR THE HILTON HEAD ISLAND AIRPORT EXPANSION]

[14. WIMBEE CREEK FISHING PIER – CONDITION ASSESSMENT]

[00:55:17]

4 F1 4 F1

[00:57:31]

THIS IS TEST NUMBER: 2 THIS IS TEST NUMBER: 3 THIS IS TEST NUMBER: 4

[00:57:34]

THIS IS TEST NUMBER: 5 THIS IS TEST NUMBER: 6 THIS IS TEST NUMBER: 7

[00:57:37]

THIS IS TEST NUMBER: 8 4 F1

[00:59:13]

I AGREE JACK, AND PUT AN ALUMINUM BACK IN AND ALTER IT IF WOULD BE A TEMPER.

[00:59:16]

[00:59:19]

AGAIN THE IMPORTANT POINT IS A SERVICE LIFE OF ALL FIVE YEARS. >> YOU COMPLETELY DABBLE IN

[00:59:29]

STRUCTURALLY THE PROBABLE COST IS SOMEWHERE SIX HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS TO A COUPLE

[00:59:35]

THOUSAND DOLLARS. YES, IF THIS AREA MORE IS A NEW FISHING PIER THEY GIVE US AN

[00:59:45]

OPTION FOR A NEW TAILOR HERE BETWEEN 360 ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS AND AGAIN A

[00:59:52]

SERVICE LIKE 50 YEARS. I MIGHT ADD AND IT'S NOT ON THE POINT BUT I YOU SOME OF THE

[01:00:02]

DATA AND PAOLO WITH THAT WILL BE ON THE SITE AND MARKERS NOW AND THEY CAME UP THE STREET

[01:00:09]

RATE POINTS YOU MENTIONED GREAT NATIONS JUST CARRY A PARTICULARLY LOW.

YOU KNOW WHAT THE TRAFFIC IS. THEY SMART IT'S FISHING BUT IT'S NOT A GREAT LOCATION FOR TWO REASONS AT LEAST ON PAPER IT UP. NUMBER ONE, THERE'S SIGNIFICANT CURRENTS IN THIS AREA. AND NUMBER TWO, FISHING AT ITS BEST IS PUNCHING THROUGH THE WATER. ROBERT WAS FISHING HERE WILL WEIGH UP AGAIN THIS TIME IT'S VERY TOUGH TO FISH FROM THAT SENSE OF THE WATER. SO YOU SAID NO.

IF YOU'RE FISHING YOU'RE LEAST BACK IN THOSE LOCATIONS. IN LIEU OF A REVIEW OF A NEW TERM HERE AND LOCATION OF THE EXISTING ONE, WHY NOT A GROUND OUT FRONT WHICH WOULD BE SIGNIFICANT? THE MASS MEDIA OF THIRD QUARTER COST GOING AROUND THAT FLOAT AND YOU CAN GO OUT FOR FLOATS FIVE HUNDRED. BUT THERE IS AN OPTION THAT MIGHT USE WHILE LOOKING AT TONIGHT THE REASONS FOR THE PRESENT WANTS TO BRING FORTH A REQUEST TO ONE TIME TO HAVE A DISCUSSION OF A ONE OR ALTERNATIVES YOU WOULD PREFER AND SECONDLY TO GET A RECOMMENDATION TO PROCEED WITH RETIRING ENGINEER TO TAKE A

LOOK AT SOMETHING ALTERNATIVES. >> IF IT'S SO MUCH YOU USE IT TO MEET MY WISH STRUCTURE AND SO WE CAN GET SOME ENGINEERING ACROSS OUR MAP TO YOUR LOOK AT SOME ADDITIONAL ALTERNATIVES.

AND OUR PLAN AS TO WHO IS TO GO BACK FOR WHAT A TAX FREE AN APPLICATION TO HIRE OR AN ENGINEER. WHICH IS EXACTLY WHAT THE ONE BROADER CONSPIRACY

CONSTRUCTION. RIGHT. >> OK.

OPEN UP FOR QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS. I'D LIKE TO YES, JOE.

BUT LET ME ASK YOU THE QUESTION WHEN YOU TALK ABOUT IF WE DECIDE TO BLOW UP A LOOP HERE.

>> GROUND CODE OR NOT? NO, NO. CAN YOU SPECIFY WHAT IT.

IT LOOKS LIKE WHAT MISS ABOUT OUTFLOW WOULD BE SOMETHING SIMILAR TO THE BOAT LAND THAT

IS THERE. >> THERE IS THERE IS A WAS A CONCRETE STRUCTURE THAT'S ON THE BANK. I ALREADY HAVE WATER CANNON RESPONDS AND THEN WE HAVE A FLOAT LIKE YOUR BOAT LANDING THAT IS AIR. RIGHT.

>> ALL RIGHT. COME ON. RAILINGS, HYPER RAILINGS.

GIVE SOME SOME SIMPLE CUBA CITIZENS XML FORMAT CODE THAT THEY DON'T ACTUALLY SLIP AND FALL THE FLOAT INTO ONE GETS TO KNOW YOU COULD BE A DESIGN CONSIDERATION.

>> THOSE ARE THE KIND OF THINGS WE WOULD LIKE TO LOOK POSITION .

>> OKAY. ALL RIGHT. I WOULD SAY THAT THIS FISHING

PIER SOUNDS THAT LOCAL COMMUNITY. >> WELL AND IT ALL SPOT CHECKS

SOME VISITORS FROM THE COMMON PART OF THE COMMUNITY ALSO. >> THE ORIGINAL HERE SEVERE MEET UP WITH BEERS AND A HANDFUL THAT IF WE WERE GOING TO DO ANY REPAIRS TO THIS EXISTING EXPRESS STRUCTURE THEN I WOULD SUGGEST THAT WE JUST DO AN ALL OUT FOR REPAIR OF THE

EXISTING SCRATCH. >> BUT GIVEN THE SPIRIT THAT GAVE US WITH THE AIR AND GROUND OUR SCOPE AND YOUR LIFE AND THIS SOLVES MORE APPEALING TO ME THAN I ACTUALLY TRIED TO PASS ON THE AND THE EXISTING STRUCTURE THAT I ADMIT THAT STILL IF WE TORE DOWN THE EXISTING STRUCTURE DEMOLISH AND MOVE IT OUT. WHAT TIME FRAME ARE WE LOOKING AT? OF GETTING THE NEW STRUCTURE OF FLOATING ROUND FLOAT THEN UP AND RUNNING FOR AN ARBITRATION SO CONSIDERING APPLYING THE HD MAPS AND ACTUALLY GETTING BRAND HIRING THE ENGINEER GOING THROUGH THE SCENARIOS A PERMITTING PROCESS WHICH IS EXTREMELY LONG I WOULD SAY WE WANT TO HAPPEN SO BEFORE THE DEMOLITION COULD BE COMPLETED

ROUND PEOPLE AND THAT WOULD PROBABLY BE THE MINIMUM. >> ERIC THE JURY IS ON TO SAY

[01:05:02]

OK OTHERS ARE BUT WHILE YOU'RE THINKING DID I UNDERSTAND CORRECTLY IF I HAD THE NUMBERS ON THAT CHART THAT THE DEMOLITION AND THE REBUILDING OF A BUILDING OF A TIMBER PIER WOULD BE ABOUT ONE POINT TWO MILLION WHICH WAS ON A SIMILAR ORDER TO SOME OF THE OTHERS BUT

IT HAS TWICE THE USEFUL LIFE. >> THAT'S CORRECT. >> STATISTICS ARE AND AGAIN THEY WENT THROUGH ALL THE SCENARIOS THAT WE COULD SEE HOW IT IS TO LOOK AT THE BOMBING.

YES. MORE WE'RE LOOKING TO CORRECT THAT AND SAY AGAIN WHAT DO WE YOU WANT SOME ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING THAT WOULD DO WHAT THAT THE CURRENT ENGINEERING

HASN'T DONE SO ENGINEERING REALLY HASN'T BEEN DONE. >> EVEN IF THEY DID INSPECTIONS AND THEY WROTE A CONDITION ASSESSMENT FOR US, WHAT THIS WOULD DO IS GET AN ENGINEER ON BOARD THAT ENGINEER WORK WITH THE DECISION AS TO DEMOLISH AND BUILD SOMETHING NEW.

EVEN WITH DEMOLISHING THIS STRUCTURE, SOME ENGINEERING HAS TAKE PLACE SO THE ENGINEER WOULD DEVELOP THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATION FOR DOING THE DEMOLITION.

AND THEN IF WE WANTED TO PROCEED WITH ADDING GROUND OUTFLOW AND MAKE IT ALL TO BE A THAT SO WHAT ARE WE HEADED TOWARD POTENTIALLY SAYING THAT THE DEMOLITION AND THE NEW TIMBER PIER WITH LONGER USEFUL LIFE WOULD BE THE MORE LOGICAL THING AND THAT WE WOULD START

DOWN THAT ENGINEERING PATH? >> THE DECISION GOING FORWARD IS AT DEMOLITION OR TOUCHING OR

IS A GIVEN. >> IF THAT'S THE DECISION MAYBE IT IS.

WE NEED TO DEMOLISH THE STRUCTURE. IT MAKES SENSE FOR ONE TO BUILD SOMETHING NEW TO GET A LONGER TERM OF LIFE THE SAME AMOUNT OR LESS THEN YES WE HIRE THE ENGINEER IT WILL PREPARE THE DEMOLITION DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND THEN WE WILL WORK WITH THEM ON. PUTTING SOMETHING BACK IN. SO I GUESS THE FIRST QUESTION FOR US IS A COMMITTEE AND UNLESS STAFF WANTS TO WEIGH IN ON ANY IT IT WOULD APPEAR FROM THE NUMBERS THAT GOING DOWN THE DEMOLITION AND NEW PIER WOULD BE THE MOST COST EFFECTIVE WAY

TO GO. >> UNLESS I'M MISSING SOMETHING HERE.

I MEAN, YOU KNOW, YOU'RE GONNA SPEND A LITTLE MORE MONEY DOING THE DEMOLITION AND REBUILDING AND BUILDING A NEW PIER BUT YOU'RE GETTING A SERVICE LIFE THAT'S TWICE AS LONG.

>> SO YOU KNOW. YEAH, I'D SAY IT TO BE OVER THE LIFESPAN.

THAT WOULD BE A LOT CHEAPER. SO I GUESS THE QUESTION FOR US IS WHAT ANY.

>> GO AHEAD. YOU'RE NOT IN THE UNION. I WAS JUST GOING TO SAY DOES ANYBODY KIND OF DISAGREE WITH GOING DOWN THAT PATH OF LEAST FOR THE TIME BEING THE DEMOLITION NEW PIER GETTING AN ENGINEERED START TO LOOK AT IT? WELL, I'M NOT SO LET ME LET ME SAY SOMETHING ABOUT THE ENGINEER PIECE AND NOT I HAVEN'T TALKED ABOUT THIS WILL STAY STAFF STAFF HAVE DONE AN EXCELLENT JOB WITH THIS SO I DON'T WANT ANYTHING THAT I'M ON TO SAY TODAY TO LOOK LIKE I'M TRYING TO CONTRADICT THE STYLE THAT YOU ALL VOTED EARLIER TO

COMMISSION A BOAT RAMP STUDY THINGS LIKE THAT. >> I WOULD RECOMMEND SINCE IT'S GONNA BE A YEAR OR SO BEFORE YOU DO ANYTHING WITH THIS ANYWAY THAT WE'RE NOT SPANNED ANY ENGINEERING MONEY ON THIS BECAUSE THERE MIGHT BE OTHER ENGINEERING SERVICES THAT WE

NEED. >> ONCE THE BOAT RAMP AND OTHER THAT OTHER STUDY IS DONE AND WE COULD PROBABLY GET SOME COST SAVINGS IF WE NEED TO HAVE ENGINEERING SERVICES, OTHER ITEMS ONES THAT STUDY IS COMPLETE TO DO THAT WHOLE EVALUATION AS ONE PIECE WILL PROBABLY SAVE MONEY IF WE CAN WAIT A FEW MONTHS. GOOD TO GET THAT DONE.

SO I'M NOT A BIG FAN. WAIT IT SEEMS LIKE WE'RE IN A CYCLE OF STUDY HIRING ENGINEERS ,STUDY HIRING ENGINEERS AND I'M NOT JUST NEXT YEAH I'M NOT TRY TO BREAK US AWAY FROM THAT AND BE A LITTLE MORE EFFICIENT . MAKE SURE WE'RE BEING AS EFFECTIVE AS POSSIBLE WITH WITH THESE TYPES OF THINGS. YOUR HE I THINK HE WAS HUMAN.

I UNDERSTAND EXACTLY WHAT YOU JUST SAID. I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH WHAT YOU JUST SAID. THIS ONE WAS DELETED AND I THINK STAFF IS ASKING WHAT DIRECTION WE WANT TO GO IN. I AGREE WITH MR. DAWSON AND YOU, MR. RODMAN THAT THAT'S THE TO ME THAT THE BETTER WAY TO GO THE BEST WAY TO GO AT THIS TIME AT THE SAME TIME BY DEMOLISHING NOT ONLY DEMOLISHING A CONSOLE. THAT'S NOT IDEAL FOR FISHING BUT WE ARE DESIGNING A FISHING PIER THAT'S IDEAL FOR THAT SITE. SO.

[01:10:04]

SO I AGREE WITH A PATH MOVING FORWARD WITH THE NEW TRUSSELL ETC. GOING FORWARD WITH FISHING PIER. BUT WHEN WE DO IT. I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM DEALING ANY SENSE OF ORDER OF MAGNITUDE OF WHAT THE ENGINEERING COSTS WOULD BE.

THAT'S BEING PROPOSED. I MEAN WHAT YOU TYPICALLY SOMEWHERE BETWEEN 18 PERCENT OF THE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND PERMITTING ABOUT A HUNDRED AND FIFTY THOUSAND COUNTING THE

DEMOLITION. >> YES. >> I'M KIND OF PERSONALLY I'M KIND OF A DIFFERENT WHICH WHICHEVER WAY STAFF WANTED TO GO WITH THE OKATIE WITHIN THE

WIND BY THE MEDIA. >> GET ON WITH IT AND BOTHER ME.

THE PROJECT I THINK WEEK I'LL LEAVE IT IN YOUR HANDS FOR RECOMMENDATION BUT ANYBODY DISAGREE WITH KIND OF THE PATH FROM LET STAFF DECIDE THAT WE CAN DISCUSS IT AS A STAFF AND DECIDE WHAT MAKES MOST SOUNDS. I MEAN WE'VE WE'VE GOT A LITTLE BIT OF PRESSURE ON US BECAUSE WE'VE GOT TO MOVE ON THIS ONE OR WE'D NEED TO MOVE TO DEAL WITH THE PUBLIC SENTIMENT THAT WAS EXPRESSED SEVERAL WEEKS AGO TO PROVIDE SOME FDA ACCESSIBILITY.

>> I THINK THIS IS THE PIER WHERE WE HAD IT. WE HAVE THE FACEBOOK POSTINGS ABOUT PROVIDING ACCESSIBILITY. HE'S NO DISAGREE WITH IT. LET'S LEAVE IT IN YOUR HANDS WITH KIND OF A SENSE IT PROBABLY MAKES SENSE TO PUT A NEW FEAR WOULD COME BACK WHEN

YOU WANT SOME MONEY. START WROTE QUICKLY. >> I STARTED OUT THAT I THINK IT'S PROBABLY REMOVED THIS FROM THE OTHER STUDY THAT'S BEING DONE IN ZEITOUN THIS ONE.

SO I'VE GOT IT. >> WE'LL DO THAT. >> I KIND OF THINK BRIAN'S RIGHT. ANYBODY DISAGREE WITH THAT? LET'S MOVE STUFF OUT.

WELL, WE SAVE A LITTLE BIT OF MONEY. >> ANY OTHER SURVEY?

>> WELL, YOU WOULD COME TO THINK ABOUT IT WITH STAFF BUT YOU COULD.

WE'D WELCOME ME COMING BACK AND SAYING WE WANT SOME MONEY TO GET ON WITH.

>> I'LL LEAVE IT LIKE THIS. WE'LL DO IT IN A MANNER WHERE IT SAVES THE COUNTY THE MOST BY AMOUNT OF MONEY AND KEEPS PROJECTS MOVING ON AND ON AFFECT THEIR INEFFICIENT

MANNER. THAT'S OKAY WITH YOU, BRIAN. >> WELL, YOU KNOW, I HAD OTHER CONSIDERATIONS THAT YOU NEED TO THINK ABOUT PUBLIC SAFETY AND 88 COMPLIANCE.

>> YEAH, THAT'S GREAT. YEAH, I GOT I GOT. THANKS.

[15. UPDATE 170 IMPROVEMENTS (BETWEEN 278 AND 462)]

VERY GOOD POINT. OKAY. ANYTHING ELSE ON THIS ONE?

>> OKAY. NEXT ITEM I WILL TRY TO FINISH UP QUICKLY.

I COULD PROBABLY GIVE YOU AN UPDATE ON THE 170 IMPROVEMENTS .

THIS IS THE SECTION BETWEEN 278 AND 462 AND I HAVE TO GO INTO TOO MUCH DETAIL.

REMEMBER THERE'S BEEN STUDIES WHEN DONE. THERE WAS A NEAR TERM STUDY THAT WAS DONE. IT WAS DONE TO FIND ABOUT A 3 MILLION DOLLAR TOTAL COST FOR SUB PROJECTS. DELIGHTED 462 HAS BEEN DONE. THAT LEAVES 3 WE AGREED TO GET ON WITH THE ENGINEERING AND WE APPROVED A MILLION AND A HALF TOWARD THE CONSTRUCTION.

WE BELIEVE THE JASPERS AND IN THE PROCESS OF APPROVING ABOUT A MILLION WHICH SHOULD FUND IT AND WE'RE ASKING HARDY PHIL WHO SAYS THEY WOULD PARTICIPATE BUT HAVEN'T AGREED ON AN AMOUNT YET . SO I THINK THAT'S MOVING FORWARD.

I THINK THE ONLY SLIGHT ISSUE CAME UP WAS THAT DEAL. IF YOU CAN THINK ABOUT IF YOU WERE GOING WESTBOUND ON 278 AND GOT OFF AND YOU WERE ON THE RAMP THAT BUTTS INTO 170 I THINK DOTY IS LOOKING FOR TWO LEFT TURNS AND I THINK MOST OF US REALIZE YOU NEED TO RIGHT TURNS FROM MY PERSPECTIVE AS LONG AS THE ENGINEERS SORT IT OUT.

BUT IF WHETHER WE HAVE TWO LEFTS AND TWO RIGHTS OR ONE OF EACH WITH ONE LINE IT GOES BOTH WAYS AS LONG AS WE SATISFY BOTH OF THOSE. I THINK WE'RE IN GOOD SHAPE AND I THINK THE OTHER PIECE THAT'S DONE FOR US IS SAYING IT'S GOING TO OPEN UP AN AWFUL LOT OF DISCUSSION WITH JASPER. WE KNOW THERE'S AN AWFUL LOT OF DEVELOPMENT GOING ALONG THERE EVERY TIME YOU GO BY THIS, YOU KNOW, A NEW AND NEW LOT THAT'S BEING WORKED ON AND IT BEHOOVES BOTH OURSELVES AND JASPER TO WORK TOGETHER AND I THINK THIS IS A FIRST STEP.

[16. SC 170 ACCESS MANAGEMENT PLAN NORTH]

ANY COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS ON ON THAT ONE? SAYING THEN THERE'S SOMETHING

CALLED THE 170 ACCESS PLAN IN THE NORTH, OK? >> I BELIEVE IT IS OUR FIRST

PRESENTATION. >> GOOD EVENING. COMMITTEE MEMBERS, I AM HERE JUST TO INTRODUCE YOU ALL TO A JOINT PLANNING EFFORT THAT'S TAKING PLACE BETWEEN THE CITY OF BEAUFORT AND THE COUNTY FOR THE SC 170 CORRIDOR FROM PARIS ISLAND GATEWAY TO CASTLE ROCK

ROAD. >> THE LAST TIME A PLANNING EFFORT WAS DONE FOR ACCESS MANAGEMENT ON THIS PORTION OF THE CORRIDOR WAS IN 2002. SO 20 YEARS AGO ESSENTIALLY AT

THIS POINT AND SINCE THEN SOME CONDITIONS HAVE CHANGED. >> WE HAVE SOME NEW ISSUES ON A CORRIDOR THAT DIDN'T EXIST AT THE ORIGINAL TIME OF THAT PLAN. A REALLY GOOD EXAMPLE OF THAT

[01:15:03]

IS THE BRIDGES PREPARATORY SCHOOLS ISSUES WITH INGRESS AND EGRESS OUT THEIR ACCESS ONTO

THE CORRIDOR. >> I BELIEVE THEY'VE HAD POLICE OFFICERS OUT THERE HELPING THEM MANAGE TRAFFIC, TRYING TO GET STUDENTS TO AND FROM SCHOOL. WE ALSO HAVE SOME BIG COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT COMING DOWN THE PIPELINE ON THAT PART QUARTER CLOSER TO THE PARRIS ISLAND GATEWAY OF RIGHT ACROSS FROM THE WALMART AND T.J. MAX PARKING YOUR SHOPPING CENTERS.

SO WITH ALL OF THIS DEVELOPMENT COMING DOWN THE PIPELINE SOON TO BE ONLINE THOUGHT IT WAS AN OPPORTUNE TIME TO TAKE A LOOK AT THAT ACCESS MANAGEMENT PLAN AND UPDATE IT SO THAT WE'RE WE'RE FRESH AND WE'RE WORKING WITH THE NEW CONDITIONS ON THE GROUND.

>> AND SO ANDREW'S ENGINEERING WAS PROCURED UNDER A SMALL AND E TO CONDUCT THE UPDATE.

>> THE CITY AND THE COUNTY ARE SPLITTING THE COST 50/50. SO WE WANTED TO LET YOU ALL KNOW ABOUT THIS BECAUSE NEXT MONTH THERE WILL BE AN IGAD CODIFYING THAT COST SHARE AGREEMENT COMING BEFORE YOU FOR CONSIDERATION AND IN THE NEXT SEVERAL MONTHS IT'S HOPED THAT THE PLAN WILL COME BEFORE YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION. SO THERE'S THERE'S NO ACTION TONIGHT ON THIS. WE JUST WANTED TO LET YOU ALL KNOW ABOUT WHAT'S GOING ON AND

WHAT TO EXPECT IN THE NEXT FEW MONTHS. >> GREAT QUESTIONS.

[17. AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO EXECUTE A MODIFICATION OF DRAINAGE EASEMENT ASSOCIATED WITH PARCEL #R112-031-000-0628-0000]

TERRENCE SAYING NONE. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU.

LASTLY, WE'RE LOOKING FOR SOME KIND OF A DRAINAGE EASEMENT FOR A COUPLE OF PARCELS.

YES, YES. YOU CAN GIVE SOME DETAIL THIS MIDDLE EAST AND THERE SOME HERE. SO HELP BASICALLY BACK IN THE 90S TRANSPARENTLY GRANTED TO THESE EASEMENT IS LOCATED IN THE OIL YOU AND RECYCLE RIGHT AWAY MAN.

WE NOTICE THAT THE LOCATION OF THE PHYSICALLY PHYSICAL LOCATION WHICH IS ACTUALLY NOT THERE. THE PORT OF EASEMENT IS THE ACTION PRESENTED BEFORE YOU BASICALLY OF PUTTING THE ACTUAL RECORD OF THESE SPENT ON THE ACTUAL PHYSICALLY WHERE IT IS THIS SYSTEM RUNS IS A KIND OF A DRAINAGE THAT DRAINS ALL OF ONE'S COMPANY FOR A BROAD RIVER BRIDGE AND IT'S KIND OF THIS ONE IS ADJACENT TO THE POPLAR POINT HOMES THERE ARE ONLY SEVEN HEAVILY SORRY QUESTIONS ON THIS MOVE MOTION SO MOVED CERTAINLY ORGANIZED THE SECOND ANY OBJECTION SAYING NO OBJECTION THIS IS APPROVED AS PERMIT IT.

[18. CHAIRMAN'S WRAP UP]

>> LET ME JUST MAKE ONE OR TWO CLOSING COMMENTS IF I MIGHT. WE'RE GOING TO HAVE OUR RETREAT AS WE TALKED ABOUT IN NOVEMBER AND I THINK WE AS A COMMITTEE NEED TO BE THINKING ABOUT WHAT OUR OBJECTIVES MIGHT BE FOR NEXT YEAR. AND SO I IMAGINE WE'LL TALK ABOUT THAT AT OUR OCTOBER MEETING IN TERMS OF THE SIX THAT WE HAVE ON OUR TABLE RIGHT NOW. ONE IS THE FERRY. IT'S BEEN GOING A LITTLE BIT SLOWER BUT THERE ARE THREE POSSIBILITY THAT ONE IS DISCUSSIONS WITH SAVANNAH.

ONE'S DISCUSSION WITH THE FERRY COMPANY AND ONE IS PURCHASE OF ANOTHER LOCATION.

SO WE'LL SEE HOW THAT UNFOLDS. WE TALKED ABOUT THE AIRPORT ON THE SOLID WASTE SOME GOOD PROGRESS WITH THE ENTERPRISE ZONE BUT AT THE SAME TIME THE NEXT KIND OF BIG STEP IS WHAT THEY CALL A SUSTAINABILITY CAMPUS WHERE WE COULD GAIN BETTER CONTROL OVER THE FLOW OF THE OF THE WASTE WHICH PROVIDES OPTIONS TO DO A LOT OF THINGS.

I THINK STAFF IS GETTING RELATIVELY CLOSE ON THAT AND THERE'S A COUPLE OF SITES THAT ARE IN PLAY WHICH WE CAN'T TALK ABOUT. SO WE MAY END UP HAVING A DISCUSSION JUST FROM A GENERIC STANDPOINT BUT I THINK THAT'S COMING ALONG.

THERE ARE THREE MAJOR BUNCHES OF CAPITAL. ONE IS CAPITAL ITSELF.

ONE IS THE TRANSPORT STUFF WHICH WE HAVE TALKED QUITE A BIT ABOUT AND THE OTHER IS THE FACILITIES PIECE. AND ON THE FACILITIES PIECE YORK IF HE WOULD KIND OF SPEARHEAD THE DISCUSSION ON THAT DENSELY AS EARLY AS OCTOBER ON THAT AND I THINK THE PATH FORWARD ON THAT HAVING RECEIVED THE PLAN AND DISCUSSED IT IN DETAIL IS TO SOMEWHAT ACCEPT IT. SO IT'S THERE AS A LIST OF THINGS FOR THE FUTURE BECAUSE A LOT GOOD WORK WENT INTO THAT ALTHOUGH AS WE DO A FINAL WRAP UP ON IT THERE MAY BE A COUPLE OF THINGS THAT WE WANT THE CONSULTANTS TO DO DIFFERENT IF THEY WANTED IF WE WANTED TO HAVE A FEW MORE THINGS FOR HISTORY SINCE THIS HAS ALL BEEN PUT TOGETHER.

I THINK ANY PART OF ALL THREE OF THESE PLANS HAS A FUNDING COMPONENT TO IT AND WHITNEY HAS BEEN KIND ENOUGH TO SAY THAT SHE'LL HELP US WITH THAT. AND I'VE SPOKEN WITH MARKET KIND OF BRANCHES BOTH OF OUR COMMITTEES AND I HAD A PERFECT WORLD COME OUT OF THIS YEAR