[00:00:09]
BEAVER COUNTY COMMITTEE MEETING.
IS THIS A MEETING OF THE AD HOC SELF-EVALUATION COMMITTEE MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE? UH, THERE WAS RIBBON GER, PATRICIA FREDERICK, AND IT WAS TRULY A MALE CAMPBELL COUNTY CHANNEL.
WE'LL BE, UH, LIVESTREAMING THIS PRESENTATION, AND, UH, WE WILL BEGIN THE MEETING WITH THE AGENDA ITEM OR THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE YOU CAN ATTACH.
I ACTUALLY JUST FLY OVER AMERICA TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL.
UH, NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS THE APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA.
AND SECOND THAT WE HAVE PROVED THE AGENDA ALL IN FAVOR.
THREE ZERO, AND GO TO THE NEXT ITEM.
WE DON'T HAVE ANY, NO PUBLIC COMMENTS OR FAST FORWARD INTO OUR DISCUSSION.
WE WERE TASKED WITH DEVELOPING A INSTRUMENT OR TOOL FOR SELF EVALUATION, WHICH WE, WE DID AND PRESENTED TO THE BOARD, A SPECIAL CALL BOARD MEETING AT THAT MEETING.
THEY GAVE US AN ADDITIONAL TASK.
AND AT THAT TIME WE ALSO WELCOME A NEW BOARD MAP, A NEW COMMITTEE MEMBER.
SO MY QUESTION TO OUR COMMITTEE MEMBERS IS WHERE ARE WE AND WHERE DO WE WANT TO GO TO OF THIS DISCUSSION? ANY COMMENTS? I CAN'T REMEMBER WHAT THE BOARD ACTUALLY TASKED US WITH OUR LAST MEETING.
THEY ASKED US WHAT GOING ON AND DO SOME, SOME VETTING OF THE FINDINGS AND DEVELOPING A DIRECTION.
SO FROM WHAT WE FOUND, WHAT DO WE SAY GS FROM THERE IS I SUPPOSE, WHERE, WHERE WE ARE.
THAT'S WHAT I INTERPRET MY KESHER IN A WAY.
AND THEN YOU CAN, YOU KNOW, YEAH.
YOU KNOW, MEL AND DAVID, AS, AS I RECALL, WHEN WE FIRST PUT OUT THIS EVALUATION INSTRUMENT, WE GOT A LOT OF FEEDBACK THAT IT WAS REALLY LONG AND VERY LENGTHY.
UM, HOWEVER, WHEN WE PRESENTED THE RESULTS BROKEN DOWN, I THINK THE FEEDBACK WAS, THIS WAS PRETTY GOOD INFORMATION.
UM, AND THAT, UH, THE TIME SPENT FILLING OUT THE, UM, INSTRUMENT, YOU KNOW, MUST HAVE BEEN WORTHWHILE.
SO THAT'S JUST KIND OF THE RECAP WITH THAT AS FAR AS WHERE DO WE GO WITH THE FINDINGS? UM, I HAVEN'T WRAPPED MY HEAD AROUND YET.
WHAT WE DO WITH THAT? ARE YOU IN AGREEMENT THAT THAT WAS THE TASK? OR ARE YOU SAYING THAT WERE, YOU KNOW, CAUSE I GUESS IT WAS ANTICIPATED THAT WE WOULD HAVE COMPLETED OUR TASK WHEN WE PRESENTED THE TOOL TO THE BOARD AND THEY MET SATISFACTION, BUT OF COURSE THEY DIDN'T DISSOLVE THE COMMITTEE AND THEY ASKED US TO GO ON AND
[00:05:01]
COME UP WITH SOME FURTHER RECOMMENDATIONS OF HOW WE CAN BECOME A BETTER BOARD.I ASSUME I DON'T KNOW HOW WE CAN DO SOMETHING WITH WHAT WE FOUND.
I, AND I, UM, TRY TO WRAP MY HEAD AROUND WHAT WE FOUND FIRST TO, TO SEE WHETHER WE ARE ALREADY COMING ALONG ON THE PASSCODE AND IMPROVING AS A BOARD OR, OR NOT, OR WHAT ELSE CAN WE SUGGEST? UM, SO I LOOKED AT THE FINDINGS AGAIN, SEE WHAT WE DID FIND AND FOCUS ON SOME OF THE AREAS, YOU KNOW, OF EMPHASIS, POSITIVES AND NEGATIVES.
SO I LOOKED BACK AT, AT TRICIA'S PRESENTATION AND HER A SYNOPSIS, A COMMENTARY, AND THEN I LOOKED AT WHAT THE Y GRAPHS SHOWED HIM AND WHAT THE HIGHLIGHTED QUESTIONS WERE THERE QUESTIONS THAT DIDN'T DO SO WELL, I SHOULD SAY I DIDN'T LOOK SO MUCH AT THE, AT THE POSITIVES IF, IF WE CAN, WE CAN LOOK AT TRISH'S RIGHT NOW.
SO A MALE THAT THAT'S, THAT'S WHEN I SAID I COULDN'T WRAP MY HEAD AROUND IT.
IT WAS WHAT I, WHAT I MEANT WAS, UM, YOU KNOW, EXACTLY WHAT THE TASKING WAS.
I THINK THAT WE, WE WERE TASKED TO HAVE SOME KIND OF FOLLOW-UP AND HOW WE WOULD IMPLEMENT CHANGES BASED ON THOSE AREAS OF HIGHEST NEED THROUGHOUT THE YEAR.
AND THEN I ALSO GOT THE IMPRESSION THAT MAY BE NEXT YEAR'S EVALUATION INSTRUMENT.
UM, UH, YOU KNOW, I'M NOT SURE IF, IF THE FEEDBACK WAS, SHOULD LOOK EXACTLY LIKE THIS OR WE NEED TO WORK ON, WHAT WOULD IT LOOK LIKE FOR NEXT YEAR? I MEAN, YOU KNOW, HOW LONG IT TOOK US TO DEVELOP THIS, UH, IF WE WERE GOING TO CHANGE IT AT ALL, THEN THAT WOULD HAVE TO BE A PROCESS THAT STARTS SOON ALSO.
I, YOU KNOW, I AGREE WITH YOU THAT MAN, WHEN YOU SIT OR WRAP YOUR HEAD AROUND IT, I'M SURE BY GOING FORWARD AND LOOKING AT SOME OTHER CONCERNS, WE JUST PUSH IT BACK INTO THE, I GUESS, THE FULL BOARDS, UH, VENUE IN TERMS OF WHERE ARE WE GOING TO GO FROM HERE? CAUSE THAT'S NOT, YOU KNOW, THAT'S NOT OUR COMMITTEE'S CHARGE OF, UH, WHERE WE GO.
WE JUST, WE COULD JUST POINT THEM AT SOME OF THE, SOME OF THE HIGHLIGHTED THINGS AGAIN, AND MAYBE MAKE SUGGESTIONS OF WHERE WE ARE IN TERMS OF THAT FROM OUR, OUR, YOU KNOW, INDEPENDENT, UH, OBSERVATION OF WHAT'S BEEN TAKING PLACE OVER THE LAST MONTH, MONTH AND A HALF.
BUT, UM, YEAH, IF, IF, IF WE WERE GOING TO BE GIVEN A JUDGE OF DOING ROLE WITH THIS TOOL, THEN I DIDN'T GET THAT.
I DIDN'T GET THAT WE WERE TO DO MORE WITH THE TOOL.
I DIDN'T, I DIDN'T HEAR THAT SPECIFICALLY.
AND I HEARD MOSTLY POSITIVE THINGS IN THE SPECIAL MEETING AND, AND GO BACK AND TELL US WHERE WE NEED TO GO FOR ME, THAT HOW THAT COULD HAVE BEEN IMPLIED THERE.
UH, DAVID, ANY COMMENT? IS THERE ANYONE ELSE ON? NO, I MEAN, I AGREE.
UM, I AGREE WITH WHAT TRISHA SAID.
I THINK THERE WAS SOME HESITANCY ABOUT THE TOOL, BUT AFTER WE HAD THAT MEETING AND SAW THE RESULTS, I THOUGHT EVERYBODY ACTUALLY WAS KIND OF PLEASED WITH THE TOOL, UM, WHICH THAT WAS MY IMPRESSION.
UM, SO I'M NOT SURE IF OUR TASK IS TO GO THROUGH THOSE AREAS TO IMPROVE AND COME UP WITH SUGGESTIONS, UM, BECAUSE OF THE TOOL SEEMED FINE.
MY IMPRESSION WAS THAT THE BOARD WAS HAPPY WITH THE JAMAL.
SO WHY ARE WE, WHY ARE WE EXISTING? IS THE QUESTION REALLY IS THE, UH, SO I, AS THE ROLES IS TO DO SOME MORE LOVE THE RESULTS, RIGHT? SO MALE, YOU
[00:10:01]
INDICATED, UM, IN YOUR PART, WOULD THE, UH, THE, THE DATA PART WHERE WE HAVE NUMERICAL INFORMATION THAT I, MY THOUGHTS ON THIS WERE THAT WE TAKE THE AREAS THAT SCORED, UM, THE LEAST.SO THE, THE LOWEST, AND I'M WONDERING IF WE'RE SUPPOSED TO, LIKE YOU JUST, LIKE YOU SAID BEFORE, DO SOMETHING WITH THOSE SO THAT IT STAYS KIND OF, UM, FRONT AND CENTER TO THE BOARD SAYING, OKAY, THESE WERE OUR THREE AREAS OR FOUR AREAS OF, OF LOWEST SCORES.
LET'S JUST TAKE A LOOK AT THESE, UM, YOU KNOW, SHOULD WE BRING THEM UP QUARTERLY AND SAY, YOU KNOW, HOW ARE WE WORKING TOWARD IMPROVING THIS PARTICULAR AREA? UM, YOU KNOW, DO WE HAVE TO DEVELOP ANOTHER TOOL JUST BASED ON THOSE THREE OR FOUR AREAS THAT HAD THE LOWEST SCORES? I MEAN, THAT MIGHT BE SOME DIRECTION WE COULD GO.
I, CAN I ADD SOMETHING TO THAT? UM, THAT WAS MY IMPRESSION THAT YOU ALL WERE TO TAKE THE LOWEST SCORES AND BRING THE RECOMMENDATIONS BACK, LIKE TO A WORK SESSION OF HOW YOU WERE TO WORK ON THOSE AREAS THAT WERE THE LOWEST.
SO AS YOU SAID, QUARTERLY, GO LOOK AT THOSE LOWEST THINGS AND BRING THAT BACK TO THE BOARD.
AND WHAT WAS YOUR RECOMMENDATION OF, OF WHAT, UM, HOW, HOW ARE YOU, HOW ARE YOU WORKING FIRST OF ALL, THAT THESE ARE THE AREAS THAT NEED TO BE WORKED ON, AND THEN HOW DO YOU MONITOR, ARE YOU, OR HOW ARE YOU WORKING ON IT? YEAH, THAT'S GENERALLY WHAT WE ALL AGREE ON ON THAT, UH, WAS THE TASK I BELIEVE, BUT NOW, UH, FOCUS MORE ON WHAT WE'RE GOING TO DO, DO TO ACCOMPLISH WHAT WE SEE AS THAT TASK FROM WHAT WE HAVE.
AND YEAH, JUST YOU'RE LOOKING AT THOSE LOWER SCORES WOULD BE ONCE ONE STEP.
I ALSO WANT TO LOOK AT WHAT YOU SUMMARIZED AS THE BULLETS, MOST CRITICAL AREAS, THE SUMMARY THAT THE WAS CRITICAL THINGS THAT I HIGHLIGHTED, SOME, SOME, SOME, SOME THINGS THAT WERE I PRIORITIES AND WE CAN MAP THOSE RESULTS INTO MAYBE TWO OR THREE DIFFERENT CATEGORIES AND INITIATIVES THAT WE CAN LOOK AT AND COMPARE THEM WITH WHAT THE BOARD HAS BEEN DOING OVER THE LAST, YOU KNOW, TWO MONTHS THEY SAMPLE.
I'LL GIVE YOU AN EXAMPLE OF WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT.
UH, COLONEL GUY, HIS RECOMMENDATION, THAT WE GO ON A RETREAT, AND THAT OF COURSE ADDRESSES A COUPLE OF ITEMS I NOTICED IN TERMS OF OUR FINDINGS, UH, DEVELOPING, UH, A DIFFERENT CULTURE, BUT ALSO FOCUSING ON SOME OF THE ITEMS THAT CAME UP SHORT IN TERMS OF, UH, UH, OF OUR EVALUATION, ABOUT WHAT OUR NUMBERS LOOK LIKE.
I MEAN, AND LET'S SAY THE LOWEST NUMBER.
I THINK ONE OF THE LOWEST NUMBERS WE HAD WAS NUMBER THREE.
AND THAT QUESTION WAS ABOUT BOARD EFFICIENCY, MEETING, MEETING EFFICIENCY, OR MEETING EFFICIENCY.
AND WE DID ADDRESS THAT JUST THE LAST MINUTE MEETING, BUT A LOT OF TIME DISCUSSING EFFICIENCY WOULD HAVE ALSO BEEN A LOT OF TIME SHOWING HOW IS THIS YEAR? WE, WE, UH, YOU KNOW, THAT, HOW DO YOU ADDRESS THAT FROM OUR STANDPOINT, WHAT DO WE DO TO HELP THE BOARD ADDRESS THAT? OR ARE WE JUST GOING TO SANCTION SHARE WHAT THE BOARD HAS STATED THAT WE ARE GOING TO DO? OKAY.
SO MAIL USING YOUR EXAMPLE, HOW DO YOU RECOMMEND WE GO ABOUT, UM, PUTTING IT INTO A, LIKE A CONCISE DIRECTION? SO YOU, IF WE PULL UP THAT EXACT EXAMPLE ABOUT, UM, I DON'T KNOW WHICH NUMBER IT IS ON HERE, UM, ABOUT THE, YOU KNOW, THE BOARD IS EFFICIENT AND THAT WAS ONE OF OUR LOWEST SCORES.
AND THE QUESTIONS I HAD ON IT WAS, I GUESS THE, PROBABLY ON BOARD, MEDIUM BOY RELATIONSHIP, LIKE LESS THAN THREE.
I KNOW IT WAS LESS AND THAT'S THE DUDE.
[00:15:01]
THREE, ONE.SO WHAT I'M HEARING YOU SAY THEN, UH, I THINK IS THAT WE WOULD SAY, OKAY, TO ADDRESS ITEM NUMBER THREE, WHICH SCORED A 1.8, WE WOULD BRING FORWARD THINGS THAT HAVE OCCURRED SINCE THIS, THAT MIGHT ADDRESS THAT.
FOR INSTANCE, COLONEL GUYERS RECOMMENDATION OF A RETREAT.
AND SO WE WOULD, WE WOULD BRING FORTH AREAS THAT WE KNOW WE'VE DISCUSSED THAT MIGHT HELP WITH THIS.
W THE SCORE, IS THAT WHAT YOU'RE SAYING? YES, YES, YES.
I THAT'S, THAT'S WHAT I ANTICIPATED OUR DIRECTION WAS, I MEAN, HOW-TO, HOW DO WE MAKE THE RESULTS LOOK BETTER? NOT NECESSARILY THE TOOL, BUT THE RESULTS LOOK BETTER.
WELL, YOU KNOW, AS A BOARD, I THINK THAT'S THE OVERALL, WHAT'S THE OVERALL GOAL OF THE SELF EVALUATION IN THE FIRST PLACE, ALWAYS EFFICIENT.
AND HOW DO WE MAKE OURSELVES EFFICIENT, BUT THAT'S NOT NECESSARILY THE RULE OF THIS COMMITTEE AND MY MIND, BUT TO GET THE BOARD JUMP-STARTED IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION.
AND YOU KNOW, WHEN I LOOKED AT YOUR, UH, SUMMARIES FROM OUR BRAINS WERE MAPPED ACROSS SOME OF THE QUEST, SOME OF THE THINGS WE HAVE, LIKE, FOR EXAMPLE, I DID A, I DID A TOP FIVE TOP SEVEN ANSWERS IN TERMS OF THE GRAPHS VIA GRAPHS.
AND THEN I, I LOOK AT YOUR, UH, PRIORITIES, NOT, NOT THE STROLLER ON DOWN ROBERT TO THE MOST NEEDS, I GUESS WHAT IT, WHATEVER IT SAYS, IT SAYS SOMETHING LIKE THE OCCURRENCE OF IMPROVEMENT.
THEY GO, UH, BOARD FOR THE WEAKNESSES, UH, HIGHEST PRIORITIES FOCUS ON WHERE TO GO SELF-DISCIPLINE IS NEEDED BY ALL MEMBERS FOR BULLETS TO FUNCTION AT ITS BEST NEGATIVE BOARD CULTURE, LACK OF TRUST AMONGST MEMBERS.
NO, IT'S BAD FOR THE GET, I WILL TELL YOU THOSE THINGS ARE STILL BOUNCING AT US, REALLY AUDIT THE MEETINGS AS A LOT OF THIS IS ABOUT, YOU KNOW, I'M SORRY.
DAVID WAS GOING TO SAY SOMETHING.
UM, DO YOU, DO YOU THINK IT WOULD BE, UM, ANY VALUE IF WE HAD THE NEW BOARD AFTER NOW THREE MONTHS, UH, RETAKE THE EVALUATION TO SEE IF SOME OF THESE AREAS OF IMPROVEMENT HAVE BEEN RESOLVED JUST BY THE CHANGE OVER IN, UM, IN THE BOARD MAKEUP? UM, I WAS JUST THINKING, I DON'T KNOW IF WE, IF WE HAD THE, THE NEW BOARD TAKE THE SELF-EVALUATION AFTER THREE MONTHS, SOME OF THESE RESULTS MIGHT CHANGE.
UM, I'M NOT SURE IF THAT, IF THAT WOULD BE WORTHWHILE OR NOT, BECAUSE I AGREE, NO DOUBT THE NEW, THE NEW MAKEUP HAS SIEGE.
IN FACT, THE TOOL IS EFFECTIVE IF YOU'D GIVE US THE RESULTS.
AND, UH, UH, THE, IN AGGRESSIVE, IT IS THAT A WEAKNESS IS GONNA CHANGE IN TERMS OF NUMBERS, BUT IT'S STILL GOING TO BE THE WEAKEST AREAS.
I DON'T KNOW
BUT I GUESS WE, WE COULD DO THAT.
WE COULD CONSIDER THAT AS A RECOMMENDATION, BUT YEAH, I DON'T KNOW.
OR YOU COULD JUST RECOMMEND CERTAIN PARTS OF THE TOOL, BUT, UH, EITHER WAY YEAH.
THAT THAT'D BE WORTHWHILE DAVID
I MEAN, I THINK THAT, UM, UH, YOU KNOW, BECAUSE WE DO HAVE TWO NEW MEMBERS AND THERE'S A LITTLE, UM, I PURSUE A DIFFERENT FEELING ON THE BOARD THAT, THAT IT CERTAINLY
[00:20:01]
COULD BE ADVANTAGEOUS TO THAT.UM, REGARDING SOME OF THIS, UH, YOU KNOW, THIS FREE RESPONSE THAT DOESN'T HAVE ANY QUANTIFIABLE, UM, DATA WITH IT, WOULD IT BE HELPFUL TO THE BOARD JUST TO SOMEHOW, UM, HAVE, HAVE THIS INFORMATION PRESENTED, LIKE EVERY BOARD MEETING, JUST, YOU KNOW, JUST LIKE ON A REMINDER OF, HEY, THESE ARE WHAT OUR PRIORITIES ARE.
JUST KIND OF KEEPING IT OUT IN FRONT SO THAT IT WOULD, CAUSE I DON'T KNOW HOW ELSE TO CHANGE HOW YOU CHANGE THIS, BUT JUST BY HAVING IT OUT THERE THAT THIS IS WHAT ARE AREAS THAT WE NEED TO IMPROVE.
SO ALMOST, ALMOST LIKE A, LIKE A SEMI, LIKE A MISSION MISSION STATEMENT, READ THE SHIP, EVERY MEETING AND WE SHOULD BE CALLED TO DEAL WITH WHATEVER YOU'RE TRYING TO DO FROM YEAH.
THAT'S OUR RECOMMENDATION THAT WE NEED TO PUT FORWARD.
I THINK IT WOULD BE VERY HELPFUL TO HAVE THESE, YOU KNOW, THAT OLD SAYING IF IT'S INSIGHT IT'S IN MIND, IF IT'S NOT INSIGHT IT'S, IT'S NOT IN MIND.
SO JUST BEING AWARE OF, HEY, THESE ARE AREAS THAT EVERYONE SAID WE'RE CONCERNED, LET'S SEE IF WE CAN, CAN FOCUS ON THIS DURING THE MEETINGS, WHICH, UM, OR YOU RUN YOUR, ALL THE PANELS THERE, OR JUST THE HIGHEST PRIORITY IT'S PRIORITY IN TERMS OF STRENGTH AND HIGHEST PRIORITY AND TIMES A WEAKNESSES, UH, YOU KNOW, YOU GOT LIKE THREE TABS.
UM, BUT REMEMBER SOME OF THESE ARE, ARE, UM, THEY OVERLAP BECAUSE I TOOK IT DIRECTLY FROM THE RESPONSES.
UM, SO, SO SOME OF SOMEONE'S FIRST PRIORITY MIGHT BE SOMEONE ELSE'S THIRD PRIORITY.
SO THERE IS QUITE A BIT OF OVERLAP ON THESE THREE THINGS I COULD CONSOLIDATE IT AND, UM, YOU KNOW, JUST, YES, LET'S DO THAT AS I RECOMMEND WE DO THAT THEN.
SO I DID IT AND, AND, AND WELL, I MEAN, YEAH, I MEAN, IF YOU CAN SOLVE IT, THEN, YOU KNOW, YOU GOTTA MAKE SURE THAT THE ONES THAT ARE THE HIGHEST PRIORITIES, THEY PROBABLY AUTOMATICALLY GOING TO MAN, I MEAN THE FULL FINE.
LIKE THE HIGHEST PRIORITY, YOU KNOW, THE FIRST BULLET SAYS FOCUS ON BOARD GOALS, BUT THEY, THIRD HIGH AS PRIORITY ALSO HAS FOCUS ON GOALS.
SO, YOU KNOW WHAT I'M SAYING? IT DEPENDED ON WHO WAS ANSWERING IT.
SO BY CONSOLIDATING IT, IT WOULD STILL HAVE THE FOCUS ON THE GOALS.
WELL, THAT'S A SUGGESTION THAT WE'RE GOING TO BRING TO THE BULL FOR THE BOARD, RIGHT.
IS DO WE HAVE TO MOTION THAT AS A RECOMMENDATION, THAT THAT HAS TO BE MOVED UP STATUS OR GESTURE OR WHAT, I MEAN, WHAT IS OUR ACTION WITH THAT? CAN I MAKE A SUGGESTION PASS ONE TIME, THE BOARD TRY TO DO AN EVALUATION OF THEMSELVES AFTER EACH MEETING.
SO THEY WOULD DO A SELF EVALUATION, THEY HAVE A LIST OF ITEMS. AND I THINK THAT WAS ONE OF THE THINGS THAT YOU SAW IN PUTTING THE TOOLS TOGETHER.
SO PERHAPS IF YOU TAKE WITH TRISHA SAYING, YOU TAKE YOUR HIGHEST PRIORITIES AND WE PUT THEM IN THAT, IN THE SELF EVALUATION.
SO AFTER EACH MEETING, YOU CAN, WE CAN COLLECT, YOU KNOW, HOW YOU SCORED AND THEN AT THE WORK SESSION QUARTERLY OR WHATEVER YOU CAN REPORT OUT.
SO FOR THE LAST THREE MONTHS, YOU SAID THAT WE SCORED, YOU KNOW, WE DID WELL ON FOCUS ON BOARD GOALS OR WHATEVER THE SCORE WOULD BE, BUT YOU WOULD, WE, WE COULD COLLECT THEM AFTER EACH MEETING AND THEN AT A WORK SESSION AT THE NEXT WORK SESSION YOU CAN REPORT OUT AND YOU CAN USE THAT TO DISCUSS, OKAY, THIS IS, THIS IS ONE OF THE AREAS THAT WE AREN'T DOING SO WELL, IT'S STILL, OR WE'VE IMPROVED IN THIS AREA, BUT YOU CAN TALK ABOUT THE RESULTS AT A WORK SESSION BECAUSE YOU'VE GATHERED IF AFTER, YOU KNOW, A COUPLE OF MONTHS WORTH OF MEETINGS.
[00:25:02]
I COULD AGREE WITH THAT.LIKE I JUST MEANT ON MAKE SURE IT'S, IT'S LIMITED IN TERMS OF, SO HOW YOU LIFTED YOUR HIGHEST PRIORITIES, WHAT TRISHA HAS, THOSE WOULD BE THE THINGS THAT YOU WOULD SCORE YOURSELVES.
UM, I UNDERSTAND, I JUST DON'T WANT, I JUST DON'T WANT ANOTHER TASK AT A BOARD MEETING.
THAT'S I MEAN, ANOTHER CUMBERSOME TASK, I JUST UP MAYBE THREE, FOUR, FOUR OR FIVE QUESTIONS THAT THEY KEPT OFF THAT WE CAN CHECK OFF ON INSTEAD OF, YOU KNOW, WE EMAILED TO YOU AND YOU, YOU KNOW, THAT'S NOT SOMETHING YOU DO AT THE MEETING.
THIS IS SOMETHING YOU W WE EMAIL IT TO YOU AFTERWARDS, AND THEN, YOU KNOW, YOU SEND IT BACK.
UH, WELL, YOU, YOU, YOU KNOW, MORE ABOUT GETTING IT BACK THAN I DO.
I MEAN, IT, IT, IT, IT ISN'T, YOU KNOW, I KNOW HARD, BUT YOU KNOW, THE MOST, MOST OF YOU DO, YEAH.
I'D GO ALONG AND DOING IT RIGHT THERE AT THE MEETING AND LEAVING IT THERE SO YOU CAN PICK IT UP RIGHT THEN.
BUT, UM, I HAVE MANY QUESTIONS WHERE I REALLY QUESTIONED.
HOW MANY OF YOU THINK WE NEED, UH, MEMBERS, COMMITTEE MEMBERS OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD? I WOULD SAY WE SHOULD HAVE THREE GOALS THROUGH THREE TO FOCUS ON.
AND I THINK WE NEED THREE QUESTIONS.
HOW DID WE DO ON THAT AT THIS MEETING? YOU KNOW, HOW DID WE DO ON WHATEVER THE TOP THREE ARE THAT TRISHA'S GOING TO COME UP WITH? RIGHT.
NOW, HOW DO WE GET IT APPROVED BY THE BOARD? BECAUSE WE HAVE TO MOTION THAT WE HAVE TO AGREE THAT BOARD MEMBERS DO IT, UH, AS A SUGGESTED EFFORT THAT THEY DON'T NECESSARILY HAVE TO COMPLY WITH.
AFTER WE CONSOLIDATE AND COMP WITH THE TOP THREE GOALS, THEN WE CAN GO TO THE BOARD AND SAY, WE SUGGEST THIS.
WE CAN GET THE BOARD TO VOTE ON IT BECAUSE EVERYBODY HAS TO AGREE OR I'LL START GOING TO WORK.
THAT'S JUST OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD WHERE I'M THINKING, I'M THINKING THE SAME THING.
I WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT IT'S DONE FOR THE BULL'S BOTTOM.
IT'S GOT TO BE ALMOST ENFORCEABLE ADULT IT'S, DOESN'T MAKE IT ENFORCEABLE, BUT AT LEAST, YEAH, IT WAS AGREED UPON IT'S YOURS.
SOMETHING ELSE THAT WE COULD DRAW FROM IF IT'S NOT DONE.
DICK DAVID, YOU STARTED TO SAY, UM, THE TOP THREE GOALS.
AND THEN THE QUESTION IS, HOW DID WE DO, DID YOU, WERE YOU GOING TO EXPOUND ON THAT? YEAH, I WOULD THINK WE HAVE THREE GOALS TO FOCUS ON THE TOP THREE.
AND THEN THE QUESTIONS AFTERWARDS WOULD BE, HOW DID WE DO AT THIS MEETING ON HITTING THAT GOAL? RIGHT.
NUMBER ONE, NUMBER TWO, NUMBER THREE.
AND WE DO IT IN THE SAME POINT SYSTEM.
YOU ALL DEVELOPED IN OUR ONE THROUGH FIVE, YOU KNOW, LIKE THREE TABLETS, THREE, UH, UH, UH, TRICIA PLUS THE BOARD MEETING RAN EFFICIENTLY.
I MEAN, EFFICIENT BOARD MEETING IS, IS ONE OF THE GOALS.
I'M SURE I SEE NEGATIVE BULL CULTURE.
SO WHATEVER ACCOMPLICES, UH, UH, EFFICIENT BOARD MEETING IN THE MINDS OF THE OTHER RESPOND.
THAT'S, THAT'S WHAT I'M THINKING, DAVID IS SAYING.
SO I COULD WORK ON THIS AND BRING IT BACK TO THIS COMMITTEE, UM, AT OUR NEXT MEETING, WHENEVER THAT IS, AND, AND SHARE IT WITH YOU GUYS AND SAY, OKAY, BASED ON THESE THREE SLIDES, YOU KNOW, IF I BUY A SECOND, HIGHEST AND THIRD HIGHEST PRIORITY OF AREAS TO IMPROVE, I CAN GET IT DOWN TO THE TOP THREE, BECAUSE LIKE I SAID, SOME OF THESE ARE THE SAME.
UM, AND, AND THEN, YOU KNOW, I COULD WORK WITH ROB AND COME UP WITH A, WITH THE FORMAT, BRING IT BACK TO YOU GUYS, SEE HOW YOU LIKE IT.
AND THEN WE CAN BRING IT TO THE FULL BOARD.
MALA SUGGESTED THAT WE CAN ALSO PUT THIS SURVEY IN, LIKE IN A SURVEY MONKEY.
AND IT WAS LINKED TO YOUR EMAILING THAT WE, YOU KNOW, WE TAKE THE THREE QUESTIONS AND WE DO IT IN A SURVEY MONKEY AND, UM, COMES
[00:30:01]
BACK SO WE CAN DO IT THAT WAY.WHY DON'T WE COME UP WITH THE TOP THREE? WE HAVE TO MAKE SURE THAT THOSE TOP THREE ALIGN WITH THE LOWEST SCORES, RIGHT? YEAH.
BECAUSE YOU'VE GOT THIS OFF THE CUFF OFF THE FREE RESPONSES, RIGHT.
SO WE HAVE TO MAKE SURE THAT, THAT THOSE FREE RESPONSES LINE UP WITH THE LOW SCORES, UM, YEAH.
THAT THEY OVERLAP TO OVERLAP TO AGREE, BUT YEAH.
YOU KNOW, AND, UH, YEAH, DOUBLE CHECK THERE.
LIKE, LIKE, JUST BECAUSE OF THE, THE, THE, THE, UH, QUANTITATIVE EQUITY OVER, OVER BOSSES, YOU KNOW, IT'D BE HARD TO KNOW, FOR EXAMPLE, I'M LOOKING AT THE, UH, AT THE NUMBER OF MATCH-UPS IN THERE ALL BASICALLY FIT UNDER THE SAME KIND OF CULTURE, BOARD MEMBERS, BEHAVIOR, AND ET CETERA, ET CETERA, ET CETERA.
WELL, THAT'S GOING TO BE RUDE, BUT THE PRIORITIES BEING MAY HAVE ONLY WRITTEN ONE RESPONSE TO A BOARD MEMBER BEHAVIOR AND THE OTHER TWO ON SOMETHING ELSE THAT ALSO WOULD GRAVITATE TOWARDS THE TOP IN TERMS OF OH, UH, RESULTS.
THAT'S, THAT'S, THAT'S THAT TRISHA COME UP WITH HER RESPONSES THAT THEN WE CAN, UH, YEAH, I'M SURE IT'LL COME UP THESE LOWER NUMBERS AND MORE OKAY.
JUST SOMETHING WE SHOULD DO TO BE COMPREHENSIVE.
I THINK THAT WOULD, UM, LEND SOME, THE VALIDITY TO THE ENTIRE BOARD AS TO, AS, AS TO WHAT WE'RE DOING THERE TOO, SO.
AND ANYTHING ELSE JUST TO RECAP, THEN I'LL GO THROUGH THOSE THREE SLIDES, PULL OUT THE TOP THREE GOALS.
UM, BRING THAT BACK TO OUR NEXT MEETING HERE.
MOLLY'S IDEA OF SURVEY MONKEY, I THINK IS FABULOUS.
UM, AND SO ONCE WE, AS A COMMITTEE, AGREE ON THOSE THREE, AND WE COMPARE IT TO THE, UH, LOW SCORES AND MAKE SURE IT'S EXACTLY WHAT WE WANT TO ASK, THEN WE CAN PUT IT IN A SURVEY MONKEY AND BRING IT TO THE BOARD AND SEE IF THEY APPROVE.
SO WHEN DO WE WANT TO DO THIS BY? UH, WELL, WHEN'S THE NEXT BOARD MEETING? OUR NEXT BOARD MEETING IS APRIL 6TH, APRIL 6TH IS OUR NEXT POINT.
THE NEXT ONE AFTER THAT IS THE 20TH.
SO WE WILL HAVE IT PULL THE 20TH FOR SURE.
WHAT DO WE DO ON THE SIXTH THAT WE WORKING ON? ALL IT, YEAH.
I MEAN, BECAUSE WE HAVE TO HAVE ANOTHER AD HOC COMMITTEE, THIS COMMITTEE NEEDS TO MEET BEFORE HAND ANYWAY.
THAT'S JUST, WHAT I MADE SURE VERY PULLED IS IS, IS, YOU KNOW, WHATEVER.
UM, WHAT NEXT TIME YOU GUYS AVAILABLE TO MEET? I'M PRETTY FLEXIBLE.
NOT AS FLEXIBLE AS I USED TO BE WHEN I WAS YOUNGER, BUT TERRITORY, YOU KNOW, ALL THAT IS RIGHT.
MAN TOLD ME WHEN I WAS, WHEN I WAS LIKE, HE SAID, JUST KEEP WAKING UP NOW, DONE WHAT HE MEANT.
WELL, ARE YOU, ARE YOU ALL AGREE APRIL 1ST OR IS THAT TOO SOON? NEARLY APRIL FOOL.
HAS NOT TOO SOON, BUT, WELL, I, I CAN'T DO APRIL 1ST.
WHEN ARE YOU AVAILABLE? UM, YEAH, I CAN DO THIS FRIDAY.
[00:35:03]
SO GET BACK TO WEDNESDAY, PROBABLY HELD THE NEXT WEEK.WHAT ABOUT MONDAY THE FIFTH? UM, ARE YOU IN, ARE YOU WORKING THAT DAY? IS THAT NOT DOING? WE DON'T GET THE MONDAY AFTER EASTER ANYMORE OFF.
I DON'T HAVE THE SCHOOL CALENDAR IN FRONT OF ME.
WE'RE WORKING THAT DAY WHEN WE NO LONGER GET THAT AS A OKAY.
WHAT TIME? WHAT TIME? WHAT WORKS FOR YOU GUYS? UM, YOU KNOW, ANYTIME IS FINE WITH ME BOTH 10 O'CLOCK.
APRIL, APRIL 5TH AT 10 O'CLOCK.
AND, UH, I GUESS WE CAN LOOK AND SEE WHAT, WHAT TRISHA COMES UP WITH OUR MINDSET.
NOT DO IT ON JUST YOU, BUT DO A LITTLE INDEPENDENT STUDY AND, UH, AND COME UP WITH ANY OTHER IDEAS THAT WE MIGHT BETTER SERVE THE BULLET FROM MY ONE COMMITTEE.
BUT OTHER THAN THAT, I THINK WE'RE DONE.
YOU'RE FINISHED THERE AS THERE'S SOMETHING IN THE FUTURE THAT WE WANT TO TALK ABOUT.
I THINK THERE'S, UH, I THINK THAT THIS IS A REALLY GOOD FIRST STEP AND WE'LL BE ABLE TO GET SOME FEEDBACK FROM THE BOARD TOO.
I DON'T KNOW IF THERE'S OTHER BUSINESS.