[1. Public Session]
[00:00:04]
NATIONAL ORDER HERE IS HAVE RATHER DIFFERENT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES THAT ARE ETC. IF YOU WERE READING IN A WIDE WENDY CARTLEDGE JOIN THE MEETING AND IT'S ALSO BEING LIVESTREAM BY CAPACITY IN THE SCHOOL AGE ETC. IT'S LIMITED TO 30 INDIVIDUALS ON SOCIAL DISTANCING DEPARTMENTS INDIVIDUALS SAY AT LEAST 60 APART THE MAXIMUM REQUIRED STAFF OFFICERS AND
SCREEN ALL INDIVIDUALS ATTENDING THE MEETING. >> SEYMOUR HERSH FROM BASED WE
NEED A WE'LL HAVE A VOCATION. >> EXCUSE ME. APPROVED THE AGENDA FOR YOU,
MR. CHAIRMAN. >> MR. RIBAUT CAMPBELL. DO WE HAVE ANY DISCUSSION?
>> ALL RIGHT. >> VOTING IS OPEN. NOT YET.
WELL, IT LOOKS LIKE VOTING IS SOMETHING THAT'S GREAT. WHAT'S NEXT?
I LOOK IT. YES. IT'S NOT JUST POPPING UP.
YEAH. IT'S MATT WHICH IS A YES. >> DEAL.
>> EVERYBODY IS POPPING UP. NO, NO BUT EVERYONE. I GUESS ANDREW WILL ANSWER YES.
YES, YES, YES. YES. >> ALL RIGHT.
AND THAT'S THE END PERSONALLY FOR JAMES, THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WENT TO RICHARD JUST BECAUSE ONE NATION A HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT JUSTICE THE MEDIA HAS BEEN
[2. Executive Session]
PROPERLY KNOWN ABOUT A NOTION TO GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION MODE RIGHT.>> THERE. >> ALL RIGHT. COULD YOU PLEASE READ IT, MR.
TO GO? >> YES. POSSIBLE DISPOSITION OF PROPERTY PURSUANT TO SOUTH CAROLINA CODE AND IN SECTION FOR 30 FORWARD FOR THAT SEVEN
DAY A TWO IS JUST GIVING YOUR SEVEN. >> DO YOU HAVE ANY DISCUSSION AT&T IT IS NOW OPEN. GREAT. YES.
OH RIGHT AGAINST BROADBAND. YES. >> YES.
YES. TO GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION HERE IS UNANIMOUSLY SO ROBIN IS THAT EXECUTIVE SESSION I THINK WE ARE NOW COMING BACK OUT OF THE EXECUTIVE SESSION PUBLIC
[3. Public Session]
SESSION. >> THIS IS THE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION SPECIAL MEETING AGAIN WHERE 27, 20, 21 DO WE HAVE ANY ACTION IS NECESSARY OR APPROPRIATE REGARDING MATTERS DISCUSSED THAT EXECUTIVE SESSION IS ABOUT RIGHT? YES, MICHAEL.
THANK YOU, CHAIR. I WOULD JUST LIKE TO SAY THANK YOU TO MY FELLOW BOARD MEMBERS.
THAT WAS EXCELLENT AND INFORMATIVE DISCUSSION. AND AS A RESULT I WOULD LIKE TO MOVE. SO WE AUTHORIZED THE DISTRICT TO ENGAGE BOTH OF YOU FOR COUNTY AND HEAD START TO FIND A SOLUTION TO THE ISSUES OF THE LOCAL PROPERTY WHICH MAXIMIZE PREKINDERGARTEN AND EARLY EDUCATION OPPORTUNITIES IN THE COMMUNITY.
>> DO YOU HAVE A SECOND ON STAFF? THANK YOU.
DRAW. LINE SECOND NOW DISCUSSIONS OK. MR. RUTLEDGE AND HIS DAUGHTER
HAD PUT THEIR HANDS BACK ON IT. THANK YOU. >> IS JUST MAN YES.
[00:05:10]
I'D LIKE TO MAKE AN AMENDMENT OF THAT MOTION. >> AT THIS TIME I WOULD LIKE TO MOVE THAT WE WOULD GIVE A HEAD START A FEASIBLE IF A FEASIBLE LEASE.
OBVIOUSLY NOT A FEASIBLE PURCHASE TO THE HEAD START BUILDING.
I'M TELLING YOU HE SAID OUR I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT WE OFFER HEADSTART A
FEASIBLE LEASE FOR ONE DOLLAR IS. >> I DON'T THINK HE IS A MEMBER. THAT'S A MEMBER. A SEPARATE MOTION.
I AGREE. IT'S TOO DIFFERENT FROM THE ORIGINAL OR WHAT I THOUGHT SINCE WE WERE GIVING EMPTY OPPORTUNITY THEN SINCE HEAD START HAD I HAD HAD A PROCESS FIRST THAT WE WILL GIVE THEM THE FIRST OPPORTUNITY TO DO THAT TO GOING BACK TO THE COMMUNITY AS I THOUGHT THAT THAT WOULD BE REASONABLE REASONABLE.
>> SAME HERE. YEAH. YOU'RE NOT AMENDMENTS ON THE MOTION IN TIME FOR JESUS. THANK YOU VERY. AND YOU CAN MAKE MORE MOTION THIS MOTION IS THIS VOTE THAT. OH, OK. ALL RIGHT.
I'M JOE WILDCAT FROM IS THERE. THIS IS RITA AGAIN. IT'S UP THERE ON THE SCREEN JUST WE JUST CAN'T CARRY A LOT ,OK? I MOVE THAT WE AUTHORIZE THE DISTRICT TO ENGAGE BOTH FOR COUNTY AND HEAD START TO FIND A SOLUTION TO THE ISSUES AT THE LOCAL PROPERTY SHOULD SAY AT THE SENATE AND THE LOCAL PROPERTY WHICH MAXIMIZES PRE-K AND EARLY EDUCATION OPPORTUNITIES IN THE COMMUNITY THE VALUE IS OVER WAS NFC S
LESS THAN WHAT'S COMING UP TODAY. >> I JUST POPPED IN OPEN SO PUNCHING OK I JUST CAME UP I DIDN'T DO ANYTHING TO CONCLUSION.
>> YES BUILD BACK SOME REGGIE I SAID TO MYSELF UP MR. SMITH WELL WELL.
>> ARE YOU THERE? >> CAN YOU GIVE A VERBAL GO? >> O E YES MY MIKE.
YES. SO THE MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUS LIKE SO MR. SMITH YOUR HAND YOU GO DOWN PUT IT DOWN AND BACK UP IF YOU WANT TO SAVE THAT WE HAVE ANY FURTHER ACTION IS NECESSARY OR APPROPRIATE REGARDING MATTERS DISCUSS THE EXECUTIVE SESSION MR. SMITH
ABOUT WHAT WHAT ONE THING I WOULD LIKE TO SAY. >> POSSIBLY I'M I I'D LIKE TO MOVE THAT WE WOULD ALL FOR THIS PROCESS THAT WE WOULD ALL FOR HEAD START THE FIRST PURCHASE OF SALE IF IF IF IF THE BOARD WENT TO SELL THIS PRODUCT SUCH AS THOMAS PROPERTY THIS CASE.
>> SO REVENUE I THINK I KNOW THAT WE OFFER HEAD START THE FIRST PURCHASE OF SELL IF THE
BOARD DECIDES TO SELL THE PROPERTY, SET YOUR MOTION. >> CORRECT.
DO WE HAVE SEVEN TO GRAB A POINT OF ORDER SO DO THAT AGAIN.
>> I THINK THAT WOULD MAKE IN THE PREVIOUS MOTION. SO I THINK YOU FIRST HAVE TO MOVE TO RESCIND THE EMOTION WAS VOTED ON BECAUSE WHAT WE'RE DOING IS BEING MOVED TO ALLOW
[00:10:04]
THE DISTRICT TO MAKE THOSE DECISIONS AND THEN I DON'T THINK WE CAN VOTE AGAIN AND SAYTHEY HAVE TO DO THIS FIRST. >> SO LOOKING AT THE CLOCK. MEAN LARGE PERSONS WOULD BE.
IT DOESN'T TAKE YOU. CAN I ADDRESS MR. SMITH SPECIFICALLY?
>> YEAH. SO CAN YOU WRITE WHAT HE SAID THERE? SO MR. ROVE SO EXTREME? YOU KNOW, CAMPBELL, SOMETHING LIKE WHAT MR. SMITH SAID AND I HAVE AN ISSUE TO WITH THAT AND YOU'RE PROBABLY GETTING INTO THE SIMPLY WELL.
SO MR. SMITH, YOU WANT MANAGER. YEAH, GO AHEAD. YOU GOT TO START, MR. SMITH.
WHAT I THINK WHAT I THINK WE CAN DO IS THAT WHEN THEY COME BACK TO US WITH THEIR DISCUSSIONS FROM THE BOARD, THEN THAT MOTION WOULD BE APPROPRIATE.
BUT I THINK IT MIGHT BE PREMATURE AND I THINK IT GOES CONTRARY TO WHAT WE JUST PROVED. I DON'T DISAGREE WITH THE TENOR OF YOUR MOTION BUT I THINK THAT WE'RE NOT MAKING ANY DECISIONS YET. THEY'RE GOING TO COME BACK TO US WITH WHAT THEY FIND OUT. AND AT THAT POINT THEN I THINK YOUR MOTION WOULD BE WELL TAKEN . SO WOULD YOU LIKE TO WITHDRAW YOUR MOTION?
>> WE THINK WE CAN THEN GO THROUGH A DRY KNOT. >> NO, I WOULDN'T.
I WOULD LIKE TO WITHDRAW IT BECAUSE I BELIEVE THAT. I DON'T SEE THAT.
I JUST DON'T SEE IT THAT WAY. >> DO YOU SEE IT AS TWO SEPARATE THINGS THAT DON'T SORT OF INTERSECT AT ALL? SUBSIDIARY MOTION IN MOTION CAN WE POSTPONE IT UNTIL THE NEXT TIME THIS IS BROUGHT UP? WE CAN POSTPONE HIS MOTION TO THAT POINT.
SO THAT WOULD HAVE DONE BEFORE HIS. CORRECT.
OK, SO LET'S GO. RIGHT. RECOMMENDS THAT WE POSTPONE MR. SMITH'S MOTIONS UNTIL THE MOTION THAT IS ALREADY PASSED IS EXECUTED AND COMES BACK TO THE COURT, RIGHT? YEAH. AND I JUST WANT TO BE CLEAR TO MR. SMITH I DON'T DISAGREE WITH WHAT YOU'RE SAYING. I JUST THINK THIS WILL BE A MORE EFFICIENT WAY TO HANDLE IT. OK, CERTAIN THINGS HAPPENED BEFORE WE DISCUSS ANY FURTHER. OK. SO WAS YOUR VAN SECONDS THIS VOTE RIGHT? YES. THAT'S PRIVATE.
POSTURED TO POSTPONE MR SMITH'S MOTION UNTIL PREVIOUS MOTION HAS BEEN EXECUTED.
>> HE COMES BACK TO THE BOARD. >> THERE'S. WELL, I WAS WONDERING IF THAT
WAS A DEAL. >> WHAT WAS THIS POST POLLING WAS THE CORRECT TERMINOLOGY FOR
THAT? >> I MEAN IT WAS I THINK YOU SAID THAT YOU THOUGHT ABOUT THE TERMINOLOGY. IT'S UM YEAH IT IS THERE'S IT'S A SUBSIDIARY MOTION UNDER ROBERT'S RULES WHICH I DO THINK IT'S WHAT WE HAVE AGREED TO. AND IT'S KIND FORMAL BUT IT JUST BASICALLY MEANS WE'RE GONNA WE'RE GONNA PUT THIS ON HOLD.
TAKE A LOOK AT IT AGAIN. BUT THAT POSTPONE IS THE CORRECT ROBERT'S RULES TERMINOLOGY. AGREED. ED TAKES PRECEDENCE OVER MR. C THIS MOTION IF IT'S NOTED THAT THERE'S NOT HIERARCHY AT ITS FIRST OK EVERYBODY DEVELOP
SOMETHING WISNIEWSKI YES. >> GET RICH. >> YES.
>> MIDDLETON YES. >> IT'S THE EARL. >> YES.
THE MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY . MR. SMITH PEOPLE BRING HIM BACK
DOWN PLEASE. THANK YOU. >> ANY FURTHER ACTION OR AS NECESSARY OR APPROPRIATE. REGARDING REGARDING TO DISCUSS THE EXECUTIVE SESSION WHICH IS NOW MY JOB I JUST WANT TO SAY I DID. I SUPPORT THAT MOSTLY BECAUSE I'M TRUSTING YOU THEN THE BOARD AND THE BOARD THAT WE WILL DO THE RIGHT THING.
AND YOU SAID THIS WAS A GREAT, GREAT DISCUSSION AND I LOOK FORWARD TO US WORKING IT OUT
[00:15:04]
PEACEFULLY SO THAT WE CAN EDUCATE THE KIDS IN THIS DISTRICT BECAUSE WE MUST DEFINITELY CLOSE CLOSE THE ACHIEVEMENT GAP. THANK YOU, MADAM CHAIR.AND I AGREE WITH MR. SMITH. AND THAT'S WHY I THINK THAT THE MOTION HAS MERIT.
SO JUST ONCE AGAIN NOT SPENCER . ALL RIGHT.
>> I THINK WE ARE READY TO GO ON TO WORK POLICIES CONTINUATION THE SECOND READING AND SO THE POLICY COMMITTEE IN 2020 AND THE POLICY COMMITTEE NOW IN 2021 AS THE MEMBERS NOW
OVERLAP WITH THE PREVIOUS. >> I'LL TRY TO READ EITHER RACHEL OR DAVID WOULD BE EASIER
TO APPROACH OUR PARTNERSHIP. >> OK. SHE'S OUR ROLE.
OK. THAT SOUNDS FINE. THIS COULD GET YOU KEEP ASKING US CAN YOU PLEASE FORGIVE ME AN. I CAN'T KELVIN WHEN YOU WANT TO
SPEAK AGAIN. >> THANK YOU. >> ALL RIGHT.
GO AHEAD. >> DISTRIBUTOR MOMENTOUS OCCASION OF REACHED THE SECOND READING ON POLICY FOR THE FIRST TIME FIVE YEARS OF SOMEONE FROM ST. STRIP.
>> AS THE INTRO SAID THE CHANGES WE MADE BASED ON OUR CONVERSATIONS FROM A CURSORY
ARE IN BLUES TO DRAW ATTENTION. >> EVERYTHING ELSE IS A NURSERY ABOUT OBLIGATIONS.
JEFFERSON. SO I INTEND TO USE IT TO GO THROUGH THE PROBLEMS OF THE BLUE AUDIENCE AND THEN OPEN IT UP. ANY SUGGESTIONS YOUR COMPETITION. HAPPENED? ONE THING I DID MAKE A SUGGESTION ON THE DEFINITIONS ON PAGE FIVE AND IT DOESN'T SEEM LIKE IT WAS TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT. IT WAS IT WAS THAT PARAGRAPH ABOUT FORUM AND THE LAST SENTENCE I WAS REFERRING TO MAJORITY IN THAT I MENTIONED THAT THE FIRST MEETING.
BUT IT DOESN'T SEEM I GET THAT FIXED. >> SO WHEN YOU SAID THAT MOST PEOPLE EMOTIONS SURPRISE YOU NEVER BUT YOU GOT TOGETHER THAT CORRECTION BECAUSE IT'S IT'S MIXING MORE THAN THAT WITH THE MAJORITY. IT'S A IT'S ALL ABOUT QUORUM UNTIL THE LAST SENTENCE. FOR EXAMPLE, THE LAST SENTENCE IS MAJORITY.
SO YOU STOP WHEN YOU MEET AND TURN GO OVER WHAT I'M DOING WOULD YOU CAN ACTUALLY EXACT BECAUSE I THINK YOU WERE GOING TO I THINK IT'S JUST AN OVERSIGHT.
ALL RIGHT. THEY ARE TRYING TO AND ON YOU OBSTRUCT.
NO PROBLEM THERE OUR FIRST. YEAH, I GUESS. SCROLLS HOLD.
811. RICHARD RICHARD WE HAVE PAID ELEVEN AN AGENT WORKING ON THE DEAL. THIS IS THE WAS OKATIE REVIEWED QUARTERLY BY THE POLICY COMMITTEE. THE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE SPENDING THAT THAT'S JUST JUST SET EXPECTATIONS. THIS STOCK IN EVERY WEEK US THE BODY ARE ALL WE SEE WHICH ONES INDICATE POLICY
FORTY SIX. >> YEAH EXACTLY THE SAME PER PAGE 46.
UNDER FINANCIAL PLANNING ONLY FIVE AND EACH FINDING IS NEUTRAL BECAUSE EACH BEING OUT
[00:20:03]
OF THE CLIENT'S CREDIT WE GO RIGHT. WE SAID BEFORE THE POLICY READ A PERSONAL INTEREST SAY IS NOT WHAT WE TRY TO FIND. I REMEMBER THAT DR. WISNIEWSKI SAID THAT WE WERE TRYING TO MOVE AWAY FROM TAX ANTICIPATION NOTES.IS THAT WHAT NUMBER TWO IS IN REFERENCE TO? YES, AND THIS IS ALL DONE I ASSUME WITH CHRONIC CROSBY IN THE FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATIVELY AS ON SO THEIR THAT SECTION OR
REALLY DON'T SEE THE REASON WHY IS SMART RUSSIAN HISTORY. >> YOU'RE RIGHT.
IT'S REALISTIC. SO FAR YEAH ABOUT TO WROTE BECAUSE WE KNOW LIBRARIES ARE BEING COMPROMISED DOLLARS. IT'S WRONG. MAYBE IT'S EXPORT OF ALTHOUGH
DISTRICT TO SOUTHERN. >> I AGREE WITH THE SENTIMENT I JUST WASN'T I I'M NOT SURE THE MECHANICS OF HOW STRONG MY I KNOW SINCE IT'S GOTTEN MORE ON PAGE 47 KNOW NO HANDS UP IN PAGE TO GET RICH ARE LOOKING AT PAGE MOTION CAPTURE SITE VISION GO LOOK AT CASH DOWN IS YOUR I JUST HAVE A QUESTION I WAS I WAS LOOKING AT NUMBER 14 AS I STATED POSSIBLY PAYING FOR ALL CAPITAL BACKWARDS AND NOW THE
FINANCE IS PAY THE RIGHT WORD TO THE COMMUNITY. >> OH YEAH.
IT JUST SOUNDS A BIT REPAYMENT. >> YEAH. >> PAYMENT FOR ALL APARTMENTS A SARKOZY DEBT JOE XIV WITH THAT FIRST CHANGE OF AGREEMENTS MAKE CLEAR THAT THE OH YEAH YEAH.
>> BECAUSE IT'S. THAT'S RIGHT BECAUSE IT STARTS SUPERINTENDENT CHOW CAPITAL PROJECTS. SO WHAT ARE YOU SAYING THAT WE'RE SHIPPING NOW THINK TANKS
TO TAKE OFF FOR A CAPITAL BUDGET GAP? >> MEAN THAT WOULD BE ABOUT RIGHT. I WOULD SUGGEST THAT SHOULD JUST TAKE OUT A LOAN.
JUST SAY CAPITAL PROJECTS GOT A BRUTON CAN BE FINANCE BACK TO BACK PEOPLE TOO.
>> I SHALL NOT BACK THIS TEMPORARY AND SHALL NOT ADD ON TO THE BOARD OF THE PRC WHICH
[00:25:05]
I'M SURE. >> YES IT'S ACTUAL YOU RIBAUT THE PROJECTS WITH THE CURRENT REVENUE FOR THE YES THAT BUT I THINK THAT SUMS RIBAUT. WHY DO YOU THINK THAT THE WORD FUNDING BEING USED INSTEAD ON THE FUNDING FOR CAPITAL PROJECTS IS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT DO NOT BE FINANCED WITH CURRENT REVENUE. LONG TERM DEBT WILL RECOMMENDED I MEAN I I THINK BUT OUR HOLD UP IS IS PRECEDED BY THE SUPERINTENDENT SHALL NOT I
MEAN. >> SO WHAT ELSE NOW SHALL WE HAVE TO MOVE IN THIS? I THINK WE HAVE MOVED SHALL NOT I? SO THE SUPERINTENDENT SHALL NOT FUND SEVERAL PROJECTS AND PERFORM GROUP WITH CURRENT OF CURRENT REVENUE LONG TERM THAT WILL BE RECOMMENDED FOR WENT OUT WELL YOU NEED A LONG TERM DEBT RIGHT? OKAY. I THINK THAT'S SUCH A PROBLEM. HE IS SHORT TERM OR LONG BECAUSE I THINK THERE IS ONE OTHER. THERE'S SOMETHING ELSE HERE.
IT'S FINDING IT'S ALL OVER THE FLOOR. SO I THINK THEY'RE KIND
OF APOLOGIES SHORT TERM VERSUS MAYBE. >> THANK YOU.
I WAS JUST WONDERING IF IT WOULD WORK IF WE SAID IT THEN SUPERINTENDENT CHOW PAY FOR ALL CAPITAL PROJECTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PERIOD. IF IT CAN BE FINANCED WITH
CURRENT REVENUE, LONG TERM DEBT WILL BE RECOMMENDED. >> SO JUST ADDING IN THAT IF IT OR IF THEY CANNOT BE FINANCED, DOES THAT KEEP THE SAME INTENT ?
>> CAN YOU SAY THAT AGAIN? NUMBER 14? YES.
OK. SO IT STARTS OUT BY SAYING THE SUPERINTENDENT SHALL PAY FOR ALL CAPITAL PROJECTS AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PERIOD. IF THEY CANNOT BE FINANCED SO JUST PUTTING IF THEY IN FRONT OF IT. THIS CAME FROM THE FINANCE COMMITTEE SO MAYBE SOMEONE FROM THAT COMMITTEE COULD SAY WHAT WOULD THAT WORK WITH THE INTENT
BEHIND THIS? >> I THINK IT CHANGES WHAT YOU JUST SAID.
HIGHER. >> SO WHAT YOU'RE TRYING TO SAY BASICALLY THAT THE SUPERINTENDENT WILL HAVE THE ABILITY TO PAY FOR THESE PROJECTS AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUT IF NOT LONG TERM DEBT WILL BE RECOMMENDED. RIGHT.
SO IF WE JUST PUT A PERIOD AFTER THE WORD IMPROVEMENT AND PUT IF THEY CANNOT BE FINANCED MEANING THEY MEANING TO CAPITAL PROJECTS AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT IF THEY CANNOT BE FINANCED WITH CURRENT REVENUE LONG TERM DEBT WILL BE RECOMMENDED.
>> BECAUSE THE OPPOSITE OF THE EXACTLY TAX IS NOT TO USE RIVER .
OK. ALL RIGHT. SO I WAS WONDERING IF YOU TO
SIGN THOSE TAXES. YES. >> HOW ABOUT THAT?
IF YOU WANT TO BE IN DEBT, MR. GUY, ARE YOU THERE? >> YES, I AM.
>> YOU WANT TO WEIGH THEY WERE ON PAGE FORTY NINE. NUMBER 14 THERE'S THE INTENT OF THAT IS CLEAR. I WOULDN'T CHANGE A THING. THIS IS NOT YOU KNOW, LET'S POLE VAULT OVER MILESTONE. LET'S JUST ADD THAT IT'S VERY CLEAR THAT WHAT IS IS MEANT BY THIS MILLION DOLLAR BE FROM THE GROUP FROM BACK MAYBE TO WORK THAT YOU'D BE A MEMBER OF THE
THIS DOESN'T MAKE SENSE. SO FRIEDMAN RIBAUT BE RIGHT AT GOT GREGORY IF SOMETHING NEEDS TO BE IN THERE TO MAKE IT NOT WITH YOU DON'T OTHERWISE LIKE IT WAS A FEATURE THAT YOU MAY
[00:30:04]
WANT TO HEAR IF YOU'RE NOT BEING GIVEN A WORD TO CHANGE ME.>> I HAVE A GOOD IDEA SINCE WE ALL SEEM TO HAVE SOME TROUBLE WITH IT.
HOW MANY ARE POLICY? THE NEXT TIME YOU MEET YOU LIKE GET DESCRIBE TO WEIGH IN OR SOMEBODY TO MAKE IT SO IT'S UNDERSTANDABLE BECAUSE IT SEEMS LIKE ALL OF US DON'T UNDERSTAND IT. IT'S NOT CONSISTENTLY UNDERSTOOD THAT I THINK THAT SOMEBODY FROM FINANCE COMMITTEE COULD PRODUCE HELP IN UNDERSTANDING WHAT THE IMPACT OF THAT ONCE AGAIN IS CONFUSING TO ME. SO ARE MENTIONED SOMEONE AREN'T ALWAYS THE MOST PASSIONATE BUT RIGHT. SO YOU.
I THINK I UNDERSTAND EXACTLY WHAT SAYS HEY, YOU CAN EXPLAIN IT.
I READ ABOUT THE POLICY IN THE MEDIA CHICKEN. YOU STARTED WRITING FOR CAPITAL PROJECTS CAPITAL GROUP. WE HAVE THE CAPITAL. YOU SAID SO WE DON'T USE OUR
OPERATING FUNDS. WELL, JUST WAIT HERE. >> SO THIS IS LIKE SO THIS IS LIKE WHAT HAPPENED IN THE PAST. YOU DON'T THIS YEAR 8 PERCENT OPERATING FUNDS TO BUILD BETTER HIGH SCHOOL. YET THAT'S WHAT IS TRYING TO GET AWAY BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT HAPPENED. IT'S RIGHT. THAT'S WHAT.
THAT'S WHAT I THINK THE INTENT OF THIS MEANS IS THAT YOU HAVE TO LOOK FOR A NEW SCHOOL OUTFIT. NOW MY QUESTION I ASK THE FINE CAPITAL GROUP SO DO THEY HAVE
THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT IN THERE? >> WHAT GOOD IS HERE?
>> IT'S TRANSFERRING GARY, YOU TOLD ME YOU STOP RUNNING. >> I DON'T LIKE THE IS THAT IS THE INTENT IS THAT ANY LARGE PROJECT LIKE THIS IS FOR YOU AS FAR AS WELL THE ORDER IS IN SOME FASHION A THAT'S WHAT I FIGURED IT HAD TO DO IT FOR BECAUSE I WE HAD ONLY PRESENT FUNDS TO DO ANY BELIEVES THAT ON BUILDING SCHOOLS FAR OF THE DIFFICULT TO GET TO WORK.
>> WHAT HAPPENED ON THAT? YEAH I CAN CLARIFY THAT AGAIN. EACH YOU KNOW HANDS UP SOME
PARENT OF SEVEN NOW. >> I THINK WE JUST FINISHED IT. SOMEBODY DID.
I'M PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD 60. YEAH, I AND ALSO THE MISSING GROUP WE JUST THAT WE NEEDED OF THE EQUALIZED NUMBERS TO REALIZE THAT SOMETHING I DIDN'T LIKE ABOUT SWAPPING WAS THE NEXT ONE IS EIGHT A SIXTY SECONDS STARTING 70 WITH THE WHOLE ALTHOUGH ON IT WE JUST
[00:35:16]
FREEFORM QUESTIONS AT THIS POINT. >> PUT YOUR FEET UP ON THE AIR.
IT'S OK. OK. AND I TAKE YOU DOWN BEFORE I GIVE. OKAY. SORRY ABOUT THAT.
OH THAT WAS RUDE. SO THIS IS SOMETHING I'M ACTUALLY REALLY INTERESTED IN BUT I DON'T KNOW WHAT THIS FORUM IS FOR IF IT'S JUST A COMMENT ON THIS.
WE'RE NOT GOING TO TALK ABOUT IT OR IS THIS WHAT WE WOULD TALK ABOUT? WHAT ELSE SHOULD BE IN HERE? POSSIBLY BECAUSE I THINK THAT THIS IS AND IS ESPECIALLY IN AN AND 19 WE ARE PURCHASING, REUSING, REPURPOSING, OVERBURDENING OUR TECHNOLOGY.
SO IF THEY GIVE THEM A COUPLE OF THINGS IN HERE THAT COULD BE ADDED.
BUT I'M NOT SURE WHAT MIKE IS WHAT THE PROCESS IS BECAUSE I'M KIND OF COMING IN RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE I'D SAY GO AHEAD AND FIGURE RECOMMENDATIONS. ONE THING I THINK THAT IN TERMS OF WHEN WE TALK ABOUT OUR TECHNOLOGY PLANS POLICY STRATEGY, I THINK THAT WE NEED TO TALK ABOUT THE PROCESS OR HOW WE ACQUIRE TECHNOLOGY AND BECAUSE THIS IS SOMETHING I
HAVE A BIT OF A BACKGROUND IN. >> USUALLY THERE IS A PRETTY FORMAL PROCESS WHEN YOU PURCHASE NEW TECHNOLOGY AND IT INVOLVES A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL.
IT'S FOR DIFFERENT STAKEHOLDERS. IT'S THAT'S PROCESS.
IT'S BEEN A BID. THE BIDS COME BACK. IT'S PROCESSED AGAIN AND I DON'T KNOW IF THAT'S WHAT WE ARE DOING OR THAT'S WHAT WE CAN START TALKING ABOUT DOING AT SOME POINT IN THE FUTURE BECAUSE WE HAVE A LOT OF TECHNOLOGY EXPENDITURES RIGHT NOW AND I DON'T SEE THAT GOING AWAY. BUT I DON'T THINK WE HAD IT DOESN'T SEEM TO ME AS A TWO WEEK OLD BOARD MEMBER. SO THAT'S MY CAVEAT.
DOESN'T THAT STICK TO THAT WE HAVE HERE REALLY A FORMAL PROCESS FOR LOOKING AT THE TECHNOLOGY BUYING AND HOW IT WORKS AND FUNCTIONS AND INTEGRATES.
>> SO MY CONCERN IS BEYOND BEING A BOARD MEMBER WHEN WAS A PARENT?
>> THIS WAS A BIG FRUSTRATION BECAUSE THERE WAS CONSTANTLY ON OUR USING OBVIOUS NOW WE'RE USING POWER SCHOOL NOW OR USING AND THEY DIDN'T COMMUNICATE AND WE DIDN'T HAVE THE STAFF WERE TRAINED. AND SO IT'S SOMETHING I THOUGHT THAT THAT WE COULD LOOK AT.
SO IS THIS THE APPROPRIATE PLACE FOR THIS DISCUSSION? >> OR DO YOU WANT JUST TAYLOR
GUESS IN TERMS OF IF YOU CAN THINK YOU KNOW DID YOU TRY TO ADD SOMETHING ON? YEAH, EXACTLY. IN SIMPLE LANGUAGE THERE WHATEVER THAT POWER THAT THAT WE COULD ADD TO THIS COULD YOU KNOW THE NUMBER IS ALREADY SERVED OUR MARKET SERVICE OR PURCHASES OF INSTRUCTIONAL SERVICES AND OUR FOLKS JUST VISION AHEAD ON FURTHER AROUND . THAT WAS AN ATTEMPT TO GET A YEAH AND I JUST RAN TO JUSTIFY IT AHEAD OF TIME. PARTICULARLY THE RESULTS YOU'RE EXPECTING AND EVALUATED ON A REGULAR BASIS BASIC IN THIS OH. I DON'T KNOW IF IT'S THIS YEAR OVER YEAR WAS IN MOTION A WAS THAT I MEAN IT KIND OF GOES UNDER I CAN FLUSH REVIEW GENERAL TECHNOLOGY PLANS POLICIES AND IT COULD PUT PURCHASES IN THERE BUT IT'S JUST THERE IS THERE ARE THERE
ARE SOME I THINK SOME GOOD PROCESS AND WE MAY BE DOING IT. >> I DON'T KNOW.
BUT YOU KNOW, I. SO THE REASON THIS CAME TO MY ATTENTION IS WITH THE WHOLE AND I ON THE OUTSIDE LOOKING IN THAT COMPANY MIAMI THAT WE ENDED UP JUST DITCHING BECAUSE THEY COULDN'T DELIVER ON ANYTHING. AND SO I MADE THE POINT THAT THERE WAS NO DELIVERABLE DATE IN THE CONTRACT. THAT'S THE KIND OF THING THAT YOU WOULD PICK UP IN A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL. I MEAN THAT'S LIKE THE NUMBER ONE THING YOU PUT WHAT YOU WANT THE TECHNOLOGY TO HAVE, WHAT NEEDS TO BE DELIVERED, HOW YOU'RE GOING TO HANDLE TRAINING. SO I GOT MY ATTENTION.
MAYBE WE'RE NOT DOING THAT PROCESS BUT AGAIN THIS IS A POLICY MEETING.
I DON'T WANT TO TAKE PEOPLE'S TIME. I DON'T I JUST DON'T KNOW WHAT THE RIGHT COURSE OF ACTION WOULD BE IF THAT CAME OUT OF LESSONS LEARNED.
THE LESSONS WERE LESSONS LEARNED. SO EACH PROCESS.
RIGHT. AND THIS IS WHAT CAME OUT ABOUT WHAT WE LESSONS LEARNED IS OH
ON NO OK. >> THAT WAS A WHOLE SEPARATE DISCUSSION.
AND I'M SURE WE'RE VERY SEEING A DIFFERENT PROCESS. OK.
SO THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WE CAN TABLE FOR LATER. YEAH, I WAS KIND OF PROBLEMS
WITH THAT BECAUSE WELL THAT WAS NOT RIGHT. >> SO IF THAT'S THE REAL FUNDAMENTALS YOU'RE AND I MEAN IT WOULD HAVE BEEN SO MUCH MONEY AND TECHNOLOGY OUT OF NECESSITY BUT I STILL THINK YOU KNOW, WE NEED TO HAVE A FORMAL PROCESS ANYWAY.
I THINK I'VE PUT MY HEAD DOWN. THANK YOU, MR. GRINCH. >> THANK YOU, DR. SCOTT.
[00:40:06]
I THINK PERHAPS THAT TECHNOLOGY PLAN THAT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE DEVELOPED FOR A THREE YEAR PLAN WOULD ADDRESS SOME OF THIS BOAT. RIGHT.THOUGHTS AND CONCERNS AND I JUST AM TRYING TO RECALL WHERE WE STAND WITH THAT TECHNOLOGY
PLAN RIGHT NOW. DOES ANYONE ELSE REMEMBER? >> WELL, IT SOUNDS LIKE FROM WHAT I'M READING FROM OUR FIRST THING IF WE DO THAT ANALOGY PLAYING COMES OUT AND WE WANT
TO MAKE SOME CHANGES. >> WE AT THAT POINT WE COULD DO SO AND YOU GUYS YOUR VIEW.
SO YOU HAS TO BE IN THIS NOW AND THING NOW BUT IT MIGHT NOT BE A BAD IDEA.
>> AND TO THINK ABOUT TO MAKE UP YOU KNOW, TO ADD THAT THE SUPERINTENDENT CHERYL, ENSURE THAT THE TECHNOLOGY PLAN IS UP TO DATE AND COMPREHENSIVE OR SOMETHING ALONG THOSE LINES.
IF I WERE TO PUT IN ONE SENTENCE I WOULD SAY REVIEW BEFORE PURCHASE.
NUMBER TWO, DOES A REVIEW OF GENERAL TECHNOLOGY PLANS. RIGHT.
SO WE COULD JUST PUT REVIEW TECHNOLOGY PLANS POLICIES PRIOR TO PURCHASING OTHER LABOR BUT THEN THEY PROBABLY ALSO BE REVIEWED AFTER YOU KNOW BY BECAUSE A LOT OF THEM ARE, YOU KNOW, CEREMONY OR CONTRACT OR WHATEVER THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD BE YOU MORE THAN JUST
CONDITIONAL PURCHASE TIMING. >> CROSBY, YOU HAVE ANY COMMENTS FROM DURING THAT DISCUSSION? SOME TIME THE YOU'RE SHOULD HAVE NO RIGHT TO FROM ANY PLACE TO THE MICROPHONE DESIGN. THERE IS GENERALLY A TECHNOLOGY PLAN RENEWAL EACH YEAR, MAJOR RENEWAL EVERY THREE YEARS. BUT THERE WAS A POSTPONE IT BECAUSE OF IN THE STATE DEPARTMENT LEVEL I BELIEVE THAT THEY WERE MAKING A MAJOR CHANGE IN THE PLAN.
AND SO THAT DATE HAS BEEN PUSHED BACK. I DON'T KNOW THE EXACT DATE.
BUT THE DEADLINE IS UNKNOWN AT THIS TIME. SO I'LL FOLLOW UP WITH THE TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT TO SEE WHERE WE ARE IN THAT PROCESS AND I KNOW THAT THERE ARE ACTIVELY WORKING ON IT. AND THEN THEY STOPPED WHEN THE CLOSURE OCCURRED IN MARCH.
SO I'LL FOLLOW UP TO MAKE SURE IT'S I THINK IT'S WOULD BE GOOD FOR US TO PRESENT WHAT HOW DO WE DO THE TECHNOLOGY PURCHASES AND AND INSTRUCTIONAL PURCHASES MAY BE DIFFERENT THAN INSTRUCTIONAL PURPOSES BECAUSE THERE ARE EXEMPTIONS IN THE PROCUREMENT CODE FOR INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS OR INSTRUCTIONAL SOFTWARE. SO WE DON'T NECESSARILY FOLLOW THE SAME PROCESS OF BUYING A NEW LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM THAT WE LIVE BY A BUSINESS APPLICATION. FOR EXAMPLE, SO WE WOULD. WELL, LET'S LAY LET ME HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO LAY THAT OUT AND WE CAN COME BACK AT SOME FUTURE DATE SOON AND BE ABLE TO PRESENT EXACTLY HOW LONG THE PROCESS ARE. BUT I DON'T THINK THAT THERE
COULD BE SOME IMPROVEMENTS IN THAT PROCESS. >> AND THANK YOU, MR. BELL CAMPBELL. JUST WHAT I WOULD SAY THAT WE DO HAVE SOMETHING LIKE THAT CERTAIN MINIMUM OF MAXIMUM COST MINIMAL GOALS. WE KNOW WE DID IT PRESENTED TO THE BOARD FOR APPROVAL BUT ALSO THERE IS SO MANY DIFFERENT LEVELS OF PURCHASE TO BEGAN BACK EVERY DAY THAT WE PURCHASED. YOU KNOW, I TALKED ABOUT THE OTHER THINGS YOU MENTIONED. KNOW WHAT IT WENT BACK AND WE DID SEND THE BOARD BACK WITH LOGISTIC BACKING THE LESSON LEARNED AND THEM TO GIVE US MODE OF OPERATING IN TERMS OF WHAT THEY WHAT THEY NEED. AND THEN WE LOOK TO SEE IF THEY'VE COME INTO WHAT WE EXPECT THEIR RIBAUT THAT BACK TO US. YEAH.
>> DAVID ARE JUST POINTING OUT RATES SITUATION ON THESE ARE GETS TO RETHINK THESE DIFFERENT. YEAH. SUPERINTENDENT COMES BACK AND TELLING HOW IS GOING TO LEAD THEM. SO IT COULD BE THAT FOR NUMBER TWO HE WOULD COME BACK TO US COVERING WHAT RESTRICTIONS ON IT'S POSSIBLE.
I APPRECIATE YOUR INPUT. >> SORRY I DIDN'T HEAR A FRESH SET OF EYES SEE A 168 CHRISTIAN
THIRD NOW. >> I NOTICED PAGE SIXTY NINE POINTS FINANCIAL SERVICES SO
[00:45:32]
THIS ISN'T A NUMBER THREE. >> IT LOOKS LIKE IT'S LONG TERM.
YEAH. ABOUT THEY ARE NUMBER ONE. NUMBER TWO WE NEED SOME BUT
NOBODY'S TALKING. >> AND NUMBER TWO THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT THEMSELVES SUSTAINABILITY OF THE PROGRAM. I THINK THAT REFERS TO THE FOOD NUTRITION PROGRAM FINDS OUT
THAT THAT PROGRAM TO MANAGE. >> YES, IT'S YES SIR THERE IS YES.
>> AND I THINK THIS HAS BEEN DEVELOPED IN FINANCE, FOOD AND NUTRITION.
SO THE FINANCE COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT THIS. YES.
>> SO THE FIRST ARE PERPETRATED THEY ONLY REFERRED TO FOR. I GUESS ONE IMPLIES THAT WAS
ASKING SOMEONE SOME DON'T KNOW FROM. >> YEAH.
>> OKAY ON SO SPARKS GOOD RESULTS SPELL. THANK YOU.
NOW THE SUGGESTION THAT YOU'VE BEEN IN TROUBLE TRY TO EXPLAIN WHAT THESE RESULTS MEANT SONG SEVENTEEN S TO TRY EXPLAIN WHAT THESE MEN NEVER EXPANDED ON FOLLOWING CREATURES SCRAMBLED
TO DETAIL LEVEL MEASUREMENTS LIKE NEVER BEEN IN QUESTION. >> THAT'S NOT KNOWN EITHER
RIGHT? SO IS THAT SEXUAL? >> SO WE'RE ON TO THE NEXT SECTION THAT WE GET WHEN WE SUBMIT THINGS. OKAY SO ONLY 18 NUTRITION SERVICE IS OUR LAST OKATIE IN THE POLICY MENU. CORRECT.
THANK YOU. THIS IS THIS IS THE HOME OF RESEARCH WHICH IS MOST IMPORTANT SECTION WITH ME THE TITLE PAGE AND WE DO NOT FEATURE THREE COLUMNS BUT I'M GOING TO HAVE REVISITING ONCE UNDERSTAND UNDERSTANDINGS WERE REPLACE GET THE IDEA OF MANAGEMENT RECRUITMENT BEING WELL WE'RE MISSING THAT KEY TO THIS I THINK THAT WAS RESULTS.
>> YOU KNOW WHERE THERE'S THIS MUCH PAIN IS ONE POINT I RIBAUT THERE WAS MUCH GAIN IS
EFFECTIVE. >> YOU KNOW YOUR DONE WITH THE MEDIA FUTURE IMPROVEMENT VETERAN WRITE YOUR ACTUAL OVERSIGHT. YEAH THAT NEEDS TO BE IN THERE JUST SHOW UP ON YEAH. YOU THINK THAT'S JUST LIKE I A OVERSIGHT IF YOU'RE PITCHING.
ABSOLUTELY. IF YOU GO SPEND ABOUT EGYPT GET YOU BACK THOSE CHALLENGES YOU
[00:50:03]
CAN FIND IN FACT AND YOU KNOW I'M PASSIONATE ABOUT THAT. DID YOU IMPLEMENT A REJECTION ON PAGE 75 SO THIS THE THESE PERCENTAGES YOU KNOW THAT MAKE THE CATEGORIES THAT YOU JUST MENTIONED INEFFECTIVE, MINIMALLY EFFECTIVE, EFFECTIVE AND EFFECTIVE.SO WITH THOSE THOSE PERCENTAGES DETERMINE BEFORE ROTAVIRUS. YES.
YEAH. I MEAN HAS I WAS THINKING WHAT I WAS DOING THIS LAST NIGHT IT'S LIKE OK, MAYBE IT'S YOU MAY INCREASE NO PART OF OUR SUPERINTEND BECAUSE LET'S SAY EVERYBODY ELSE. I MEAN IF JUST YOU KNOW, HYPOTHETICAL THAT I SAY EVERY PICTURE IN THE SCHOOL DISTRICT AT 60 AND OLDER DECIDES I WANT TO TAKE A RISK I'M GOING TO RETIRE WHICH WOULD HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH YOU KNOW, WHAT ARE I GUESS YOU'D SAY OUR POLICIES ARE ARE YOU KNOW, CAN HELP WITH RECRUITMENT. SO I'M JUST I DON'T KNOW WHICH IS THE KIND BUT I THINK I GUESS WE WE OBVIOUSLY DID NOT ANTICIPATE A PANDEMIC WHEN WE YOU KNOW, OR WE'RE THINKING OF THESE THINGS THAT I DON'T KNOW WHAT WE DO.
AND THAT'S WHY I JUST I JUST NEEDED TO DO A WAIT. IT'S EXACTLY LIKE OUR FOURTH REVISION SAID SUPERANNUATION INNOVATION DEPARTMENT KNOWS JUST THAT WAS JUST THE STUDENTS JUST REFERRED FINANCIAL EXCITING THINGS. YOU KNOW, SYSTEMS WERE PROBLEMS BECAUSE THAT SEPARATE NO PROBLEM. CAN YOU TALK JUST A LITTLE BIT
PLEASE? >> THAT'S ALL WE HAVE TO REVISIT AND RESET YOUR CASE?
>> YEAH, SO ANY BIGGER? >> I THINK THE RIBAUT INDIVIDUALS ARE HAVING TROUBLE HEARING US FROM BOB. BOTTOM LINE IS YOU HAVE TO ESTABLISH A BASELINE IS TRUE.
HOPEFULLY BY THE END OF THIS YEAR A STRONG WORD HAS MADE IN ALL THIS.
JUST A STRONG THAT'S WHAT RESULTS ARE TO IT'S A MAJOR IMPROVEMENT.
BOTTOM LINE THIS WEEKEND SEVERAL COMPUTERS THOMAS SO HOW DO YOU ANTICIPATE AGAINST LOOK AT THIS MAY KNOW FOR THE SECOND TIME DID YOU ANTICIPATE A MOTION NOW?
>> WE THINK YOU'RE GOING TO WIN. WELL, WHAT'S THE BEST WAY FOR
NEXT STEPS? WE SET THE STRUCTURE. >> THERE WOULDN'T BE ANY CHANGES. WHERE'S THE THIRD? WELL, SPRING IS OF JOURNAL AND OFTEN IS AS WE BRING IT BACK WITH WE DIDN'T WE DIDN'T VOTE ON THE FIRST READING WHICH
SURPRISED THEY DID AT THE VERY BEGINNING OF THE FIRST READER. >> YEAH, SURE.
RACHEL MADE A MOTION. SHE'S IN THIS RIGHT NOW BUT I THINK THAT RACHEL MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE FIRST READING. IT'S BASED UPON THE CHANGES THAT WE MADE DISCUSS THE MAIN OR SOMETHING TO THAT EFFECT. SO I THINK WE I THINK WE NEED YOU NEED A VOTE OF THE OF THE READING. BUT THERE ARE SOME SECOND READING OF THE POLICY CHANGES.
>> OKAY. SO DID YOU GET THAT FROM ANY SURE TO ACCEPT THE SECOND READING OF THE POLICY MANUAL? WITH THE CHANGES NOTICE AND CAVITY NOTICE THAT NOBODY ELSE IS SO IN ANY DISCUSSION NOW WE ANTICIPATE THAT THERE WILL PROBABLY BE RESULTS.
>> AND THAT WOULD BE INNOCENT ADULTS WHO WERE PRETTY INVOLVED WE'D HAVE YEAH.
APPARENTLY. NOT AT A REAL RIGHT HERE. WE DON'T HAVE A TEMPLATE OF FUTURE BOARD WHICH CAN LOOK AT YOU A LITTLE. RIGHT.
RIGHT. RIGHT NOW A CONCERT PARTY FROM OUR COMMITTEE IS TO PUT ME IN THE STATISTICS THAT HAVEN'T IN A NORMAL YEAR. THIS IS WHAT WE WOULD EXPECT.
SO THE NEXT TIME WE HAVE A NORMAL YEAR THIS IS UNDER X BUT THERE IS GOING.
YEAH WE'RE DEFINITELY PUTS OUT CANDY. WELL, I JUST WANT TO CLARIFY I
[00:55:03]
THINK WHEN IT COMES BACK IT WON'T HAVE TO BE DEFINITIONS THE PERCENTAGE IT IS YOU BETWEEN THE DIFFERENT CATEGORIES. THE NUMBERS THAT YOU SEE HERE WILL BE THE SAME BECAUSE THIS IS AN EXAMPLE. THIS IS NOT I MEAN THAT AD HOC RESULTS COMMITTEE WILL HAVE TO GO BACK AND COME UP WITH A NEW BASELINE.WE'LL LOOK AT AT WHAT REHAB BECAUSE THINGS HAVE BEEN SO DISRUPTIVE AND BRING THAT TO THE COMMITTEE AS A STEP TO THE BOARD AS A SEPARATE FROM THAT COMMITTEE.
BUT THIS IS JUST WHAT WE'RE SHOWING HERE IS THE FORMAT WITH A DAB OF FROM THE FOUR AND WE JUST PLUGGING THINGS THAT WE HAVE FOR AND WHAT NEEDS TO BE ADDED IS THE THE KEY SO TO
SPEAK WHAT WHAT THE THINGS MEAN. >> SO ANY TRICIA THINK YOU'RE JUST CONCURRING WITH WHAT MR PYNE IS SAYING IS THAT DURING OUR DISCUSSION AND POLICY WE DID TALK ABOUT THAT THE NEED FOR THE RESULTS COMMITTEE TO BE INVOLVED WITH UPDATING THESE
FOR THE CURRENT YEAR. >> SO ARE WE READY TO OPEN VOTING?
>> OH SORRY I CAN GIVE YOU PUT OUT THERE SO UPSET RIGHT THERE. >> THAT WOULD LINE OVER GIVING THIS TO DAVID THE MOTION FOR A SECOND SECONDARY POLICY AND TREATMENT.
AND THE IT WAS BY NO BUT IS NOW OPEN. THAT'S RIGHT.
>> IS RIGHT TELLS US NOT HERE, RIGHT? >> CORRECT.
THEY DID. DAVID, HOW WERE YOU? SORRY.
SO. >> NO SHE'S APPROVED 10 0 0 WITH DANIEL WISNIEWSKI IS ABSENT FROM THE MEETING. SO I JUST WANT TO THANK ALL THE COMMITTEES BECAUSE EVERY COMMITTEE SEEM TO HAVE INPUT INTO THIS. ALMOST EVERY COMMITTEE MAKING UP WORDS ABOUT THE EVALUATION BEFORE THEY'RE GOING TO SHOW US WHAT THEY'VE DONE.
JUST NEXT WEEK. BUT IT TOOK A LOT OF WORK TO DO THIS MANUAL ON AS DAVID COMMENTED WITH IT IN FIVE YEARS WITHOUT YOU KNOW WE'VE BEEN WORKING ON IT ON UPDATING THE MANUAL AND IT SEEMS LIKE WE'RE IN THE HOMESTRETCH NOW WHICH IS NICE.
SO THANK YOU TO EVERYONE EVERYONE FOR THEIR THEIR EFFORTS AND OUR INPUT.
IT'S LIKE MADE A BIG SO A MOTION TO ADJOURN WOULD LIKE TO TAKE IT PERSONALLY LIKE IT TO ADJOURN OR CHECK IN THE HOUSE ALL IN
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.