Nov 30, 2020 Board of Education - Agenda Setting Committee

[4:00pm Call to Order]

[00:00:07]

BEFORE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION MEETING FOR AGENDA SETTING ON NOVEMBER 30, 2020 TO

ORDER. >> COULD YOU PLEASE PUT UP THE AGENDA ON THE SCREEN ROBIN DID

[Approval of Agenda]

I DON'T HAVE IN FRONT OF ME. >> OK, THANK YOU. >> CAN'T YOU CAN'T YOU SEE THIS IS THE APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA NEXT. I'M BORED DAD .

SO YOU WANT ME PUT UP THE WHOLE AGENDA? >> HOW COME IT'S NOT ON MY SCREEN? I DON'T IT'S ON MY. IT IS IT'S NOT MINE.

IT'S NOT OH I'M SORRY. >> I DO SEE IT. IT'S JUST NOT IN IT'S IT'S IT'S

ON LIKE IF IT WAS BOARD DOC. >> RIGHT. RIGHT.

>> ISN'T THAT WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING FOR TINA. THAT'S NOW IT'S WEIRD I DON'T HAVE IT. ALL RIGHT. WELL WE NEED TO GET A MOTION TO APPROVE THE AGENDA MOVE. WE APPROVED THE AGENDA. MAYBE IF YOU LOG OUT LOW BACK IN SECOND LOST TINA. YEAH, YEAH. MAYBE SHE'S LOST.

MAYBE SHE'S REFRESHING. OKAY YOU'RE MUTE IT. THERE YOU ARE.

HAPPENED THAT I'M BACK IN HERE. ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE AGENDA. YEAH. BE MADE IMMEDIATELY IN SECONDS . ANY DISCUSSION ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?

[Pledge of Allegiance, Statement of Media Notification]

>> I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS. ONE NATION HAS UNDERGONE UNDER GOD INDIVISIBLE WITH LIBERTY

AND FOR OFFER. THANK YOU. >> YOU CAN RETURN TO THE

[Approval of Committee Meeting Minutes ]

KITIMAT MINUTES FROM NOVEMBER 2ND. >> DO WE HAVE A SECOND YET? YES. YOU SAID YOU SAID NOVEMBER 2ND GETS OK.

>> THAT'S FINE. SO ANY DISCUSSION? >> ALL THOSE IN FAVOR I I.

>> ALL RIGHT. DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MEETING MINUTES THAT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY THE MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 18TH FOR THE AGENDA SETTING I MOVE WE APPROVE THE MINUTES ON NOVEMBER 18TH AGENDA SETTING MEETING A SECOND BUSH TO GIVE YOU A

SECOND. >> RIGHT. >> ANY DISCUSSION?

>> I WAS GONNA SAY THAT MAYBE WE WANTED TO PUT IN THERE THAT THAT THE S I SEE THAT THAT IT IS THE DATE THAT THE POSSIBLY THE THE THE S I SEE ARE RECOMMENDED QUESTION FOR THE COURT FOR THE COVE REPORT BUT BUT POSSIBLY THAT THAT WE CAN OWN QUESTIONS SO THAT WE AS YOU KNOW FOR THE RECORD TO SAY WE DID WE DID GET THAT MEMO JUST IN CASE THEY WERE WONDERING THAT THEY DIDN'T WANT TO ASK QUESTIONS ABOUT COVER . BUT WE WE WILL WE WILL ALLOW IT

TO WITH A DIFFERENT AGENDA. >> I'M NOT SURE WHAT YOU'RE SAYING.

>> SO YOU WANT WHAT ADDED TO THE AGENDA. I MEAN TO THE MINUTES THAT WHEN WE FIRST OF ALL WE FIRST HAD THAT MEETING WASN'T I STATED THAT ASIC WANTED TO ASK

[00:05:02]

>> I THINK HUH. COME AGAIN. >> I THINK IT WAS CHRISTINE CASPER BACK CAME UP WITH THAT RECOMMENDATION. I DON'T THINK IT CAME FROM THE I BUT I COULD BE WRONG. IT WAS. IT WAS A SUGGESTION FROM KRISTIN IF THAT'S WHAT THEY WANTED TO DO. RIGHT.

RIGHT. SURE. COULD I COULD WE REFER THAT IN

THE MILLER MINUTES? >> SURE. SO I'M STILL WHAT CAN YOU GUYS RAISE YOUR HAND WHEN YOU'RE GOING TO BE RECOGNIZED GETTING A LITTLE.

HARD TO FOLLOW. SO YOU'RE WILLIAM YOU'RE. YOU WANT TO MAKE A MOTION THAT THE S.E.C. REQUESTED? WHAT I DIDN'T I DIDN'T I WOULD MAKE A MOTION RECOURSE.

>> I THINK I MADE A MOTION FOR THE MR. REFLECT THE ACTUAL WHAT TOOK PLACE IN THE MEETING AND THEN THE MEETING THE DAY THE LADY WHOSE NAME WAS CATHY SOMETHING SHE SAID THAT THE SAIC OR WE OR EVEN SHE MENTIONED IT AND I WANT THAT TO BE IN THE MINUTES, THAT'S ALL.

IS THAT THAT SIMPLE? OUR TEAM OUR THE MYSTERY FLIGHT .

WHAT WHAT WHAT WAS WHAT WAS STATED WHAT WHAT WHAT WHAT WHAT WHAT WHAT WHAT WHAT WHAT?

WE DISCUSSED IT. >> DR. RODRIGUEZ AND MY RECOLLECTION OF THAT DISCUSSION KRISTEN CASPER IS AN EMPLOYEE OF THE BEAUFORT COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT.

>> AND WHAT KRISTIN WAS DOING WAS JUST SIMPLY SAYING THIS MIGHT BE SOMETHING YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT. NOT THAT SHE GOT THAT INFORMATION FROM SAIC OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT, BUT SHE'S JUST SAYING THIS MIGHT BE SOMETHING YOU WANT TO TALK

ABOUT. THAT'S THAT WAS IT. >> WELL, ICE WELL THAT'S WHAT

WAS IN IT. >> YOU NEED TO RAISE YOUR HAND, SIR, ON THE ELECTRONIC BOARD, PLEASE. THANK YOU. YOU MAY GO AHEAD NOW.

>> WELL, WHAT I WAS GOING TO SAY WAS THAT EVEN EVEN IF THAT'S WHAT TOOK PLACE, SHE WAS SHE EVEN THOUGH SHE'S SINCE SHE RECOMMENDED POSSIBLY I STILL WANT THAT IN THE MINUTES

BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT SHE RECOMMENDED. >> IF THERE WAS NO PROBLEM I WAS MORE. THAT'S WHAT I MISSED TOO AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE.

BE TRANSPARENT. AND SO I WANT THAT TO BE THE MINUTE I SAW.

THAT'S THE PROBLEM. >> BUT WE. KATHY, WHILE ALL OF OUR QUESTIONS DO DEAL WITH COVERED . SO IF YOU WANT TO SAY SOMETHING LIKE THAT KRISTEN CASK CASPER RECOMMENDED THAT THAT TOPIC BE COVERED RELATED.

AND THEN WE CAME UP WITH THOSE THREE QUESTIONS DOES THAT WORK ?

>> OK. I WASN'T CRITICAL. I MEAN THAT'S FINE.

I MEAN THE ONLY THING I THINK WAS THAT IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT WE TALK ABOUT CORPORATE 19 UPDATE AND THAT'S WHAT THAT'S WHAT SHE RECOMMENDED. I MEAN THIS ISN'T THERE'S A PROBLEM IS JUST BEING TRANSPARENT IF THAT'S WHAT CAME ON BOARD AND WE MADE A DECISION TO GO ON TO GO A DIFFERENT ANGLE OR WE MAY DECISION TO SPEND ON IT BUT STILL DO IT THEN I'M JUST SAYING THAT'S WHERE WE STARTED IT. WELL, I WANT TO PUT NOW FROM NOW ON WHERE WE START AND WHERE WE STARTED THAT WAS FROM HER RECOMMENDATION.

>> SO. SO REALLY I JUST LIKE A SIMPLE RIGHT THE RECOMMENDATION CAME FROM SO-AND-SO AND THIS IS WHAT SHE RECOMMENDED IN AND THE IN THE COMMITTEE.

THIS IS WHERE THEY WENT WITH. AND SO AND SO AND THEY CAN SEE WHERE WE WENT.

I MEAN I THINK WE'RE MAKING IT HARDER AND WHAT REALLY IS MY CONCERN I'M FINE WITH WHAT

KATHY SAID. >> MY CONCERN THAT KRISTEN HAS BEEN RECOMMENDED THIS FIRST OF ALL SHE IS NOT AN FDIC MEMBER AS MR. AS DR. RODRIGUEZ POINTED OUT, SHE'S AN EMPLOYEE OF THE DISTRICT. I THINK THE WAY KATHY SAID IT WAS FINE.

I WOULD NOT JUST GENERALLY SAY KRISTIN CARSON WANTED TO HAVE ON THE AGENDA COVERT DISCUSSION . I MEAN THAT'S NOT APPROPRIATE. THAT'S NOT HER DECISION.

>> SO KATHY, WHY DIDN'T YOU MAKE A MOTION YOU HAD GOOD WORDING.

>> IF I CAN REMEMBER IT OK. >> I MOVE THAT WE ADD TO THE MINUTE IT'S THE RECOMMENDATION AND SEE SORRY RECOMMENDATION FROM KRISTIN CASPER AT RECOMMENDATION FROM CRISPIN KRISTIN CASPER THAT THE TOPIC OF DISCUSSION DECODED RELATED MOTION TO ADD TO THE MINUTES

[00:10:20]

>> OK PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND IF IN THE ELECTRONIC KEY IF YOU'D LIKE TO TALK MR. SMITH.

>> THANK YOU. OK. WELL ONE OF OR FIRST OR NOT FIRST I WOULD JUST SAY THAT YOU KNOW IT'S KIND OF FRUSTRATING WHEN WOMEN SHOULD WANT TO DO A LITTLE TRICK IN THE ELECTRONIC HAND THEN YOU DON'T WANT TO TRY YOUR HAND OR YOU CALLING BASED UPON YOU KNOW IT DILUTION WAS INCONSISTENT. YOU YOU KNOW, IT'S NOT AS EASY AS ME. MR. SMITH, I'M ASKING FOR TODAY'S MEETING TO BE CONDUCTED

BY ELECTRONIC HANS. THANK YOU. >> OK.

SO WILL THIS WORK? WILL THIS BE. WILL BE HOW WE CONDUCTED B BE

CONDUCTED IN THE FUTURE? >> WELL, IF YOU'RE IF YOU IF YOU JOIN BY PHONE, WE CAN'T DO IT THAT WAY. SO TODAY ELECTRONIC HANDS. I'M JUST SPEAKING FOR TODAY,

SIR. >> I THINK THAT WE HAVE A QUESTION.

>> COULD YOU. COULD YOU CALL I WAS THE ONLY HIS NAME AGAIN.

WELL, IT WAS IT WAS THE MOST EMOTION IS TO ADD THE MAIN MOTION TO ADD TO THE MINUTES THE RECOMMENDATION FROM KRISTIN CASPER THAT THE TOPIC OF DISCUSSION OF IT RELATED TO WHAT IS QUESTIONS CASPER JOB WAS WAS HER JOB TITLE. SHE'S IN COMMUNICATIONS TEAM.

SO SHE DOES WORK FOR DECISIONS . SHE'S APPLIED COMMUNICATIONS AND SHE COMMUNICATED OBVIOUSLY WHAT SHE DID WHAT SHE WAS POSSIBLY GOT FROM THE S.E.C..

CORRECT. I CAN TELL YOU THAT. NO.

>> NOW SHE MAKES. SHE WORKS WITH ASIC AND SHE MAKES SUGGESTIONS THAT WE MIGHT TALK ABOUT. SHE BRINGS THEM TO THE BOARD. IF THE BOARD APPROVES IT THEN SHE TAKES THE S.E.C.. SO THAT SUGGESTION CAME TO THE BOARD FIRST SHE DID NOT TAKE IT TO THE S.E.C.. OK, BUT BUT BUT BUT BUT BUT SHE HAS BEEN DOING IT FOR A WHILE,

CORRECT? >> OK. SO WITH YOU I THINK YOU WOULD I THINK YOU WOULD MEAN MEAN IN THE PAST I'VE BEEN TOLD NO ONE WOULD QUESTION THAT THAT THAT

THAT'S THAT'S NOT BELIEVING IN OUR STAFF. >> AND SO I WANT BELIEVE IN THE STAFF OF THE. AND THAT'S WHAT SHE SAID THEN YOU KNOW.

I HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH IT. BUT I JUST WANT TO ADD IT TO THE NOTES OF WHAT TOOK PLACE SO I BASICALLY WANTED JUST WANTED IT TO STATE EXACTLY WHAT SHE WHAT SHE SAID.

>> SO BUT NOT NOT WITH THAT WITH THE CAVEAT I KNOW THAT I WILL SUPPORT THIS MOTION.

THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. >> ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION PLEASE LOWER YOUR HAND, MR. SMITH. I AM.

GIVE ME A SECOND. THANKS. THANK YOU.

ALL RIGHT. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, ALL THOSE OPPOSED I PROPOSED.

I'M A POPULIST, MR. SMITH. YOU STATED YOU'RE OPPOSED TO. >> YES, I AM OPPOSED.

OK. >> SO THE MOTION FAILS. SO YOU GO BACK TO THE ORIGINAL MOTION WHICH WAS TO APPROVE THE MINUTES WITHOUT AS THEY ARE PRINTED.

SO COULD YOU PUT UP KATHY'S ORIGINAL MOTION TRYING TO GET BACK TO IT?

>> THANK YOU. LET'S SEE. IT'S TAKING A WHILE.

THAT'S ALL RIGHT. >> OH, IT WON'T COME UP AS DID .

WAIT A SECOND. THE ORIGINAL MOTION. >> YES.

>> OK. THAT'S WHY I DIDN'T HAVE A SECOND ENTER.

>> OK. MR. SMITH, I WANT TO MAKE AN AMENDMENT TO THE TO OUR TO MAKE AN AMENDMENT INTO MEMBERS TO ADD THAT I'M. I MOVE THAT WE ADD THAT IT WAS SUGGESTED BY WHATEVER HER NAME IS. I MEAN I'M BOUND TO WHAT'S HER

NAME IS CHRIS RIBAUT EXCUSE ME. >> CHRISTINE CASPER. CHRISTINE CAN I MAKE A MOTION THAT COULD THAT CHRISTINE CASPER BE ADDED TO THE ADDED ATTITUDE ADDED TO THE MINUTES SAYING THAT SHE SAID SHE SUGGESTED THAT WE TALK ABOUT CORPORATE 19 THAT WE ADDED TO

COVID 19 THEN WE HAD TO COVER NINETEEN TO THE AGENDA. >> WELL THAT'S WHAT THE

[00:15:07]

THAT MOTION WAS JUST NO DEMOCRACY IS MORE SIMPLE MINDS THE SAME AS SHE DOES SHE ADMIT

THAT SHE SUGGESTED YOUR MOTION WAS HAD MORE CAVIAR TO IT. >> AND YOUR MOTION WAS A LITTLE MORE YOUR MOTION WAS WAS MORE DESCRIPTIVE. I JUST WANT TO PUT IT THAT THAT THAT THE STAFF MEMBER TOLD US THAT TO THINK THAT WE SHOULD DISCUSS CORPORATE 19.

THAT'S WHAT MY MOTION IS COMPLETELY THAT STOPS. SO TO ME THAT'S THAT'S NO DIFFERENT FROM WHAT WAS ALREADY AT KATHY MADE THE MOTION AND YOU SECOND AMENDMENT THAT

ALREADY WENT BEFORE US AND FAILED. >> ZERO DISCRETION.

SO THIS IS NOT A DIFFERENT PROFESSION, INHERENTLY DIFFERENT.

I DO NOT UNDERSTAND THE DIFFERENCE. SO THIS CHARACTER MOTION HAVE

MORE. >> CAN YOU PUT KETCHUP IF YOU GO BACK AND LOOK AT CHOPPY MOTION? JAFFE MOTION WAS MORE DESCRIPTIVE MICE IS NOT MICE JUST STATES WHAT SHE BASICALLY ASKED FOR KORVER 19 AT THIS MOTION SET IN MOTION TO ADD TO THE MINUTES THE RECOMMENDATION FROM KRISTEN CASPER THAT THE TOPIC OF DISCUSSION BE

CULVERT RELATED. >> THAT'S WHAT YOU'RE SAYING NOW MR. SMITH SHE'S HEARD WAS CALLED THE QUOTE THAT YOU SPEAK ABOUT THAT WE TALKED ABOUT CULVERT .

>> WE HAVE A COUGAR DISCUSSION AND THEN WE AND WE KNOW THAT'S NOT WHAT WE DID.

WE WE FORMED A DIFFERENT NO DID WOULD WE FORM DIFFERENT QUESTIONS IN REGARDING COVID BUT AS ABOVE WELL WE DIDN'T STRAIGHT OUT COME OUT WITH A COVERT UPDATE IF MY MEMORY SERVES ME CORRECT HOW THE MEETING STARTED OUT WITH THE LAST ME STARTED OUT DATE DEPENDS BASICALLY IT'S TO THE SLC POSSIBLY WANT TO TALK ABOUT COVID 19 AND THAT'S NOT WHAT

WE'RE TALKING ABOUT. >> WE'RE TALKING ABOUT DIFFERENT WAYS TO DO THINGS GOING THROUGH COVID BUT THERE'S NOTHING IN HERE SPECIFICALLY TALKING ABOUT ARE CORPORATE 19

SAID NO TO DO THAT. >> THOSE ARE TWO DIFFERENT THINGS I RESPECTFULLY DISAGREE WITH YOUR ANALYSIS. WE'VE ALREADY VOTED ON THIS MOTION THAT IS SO SIMILAR TO WHAT YOU'RE RECOMMENDING AND IT'S BEEN DEFEATED THAT WE ARE WILL NOT ENTERTAIN THE SAME MOTION AGAIN. SO LET'S GO AHEAD AND VOTE ON THAT ON WHAT'S ON THE FLOOR HERE NOW THE ORIGINAL MOTION TO APPROVE THE NOVEMBER 18 20 20 COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES ALL THOSE IN FAVOR I I NAYS NAY. OK. SO THE MOTION CARRIES TO ONE NEXT ON THE AGENDA IS THE SETTING OF THE DECEMBER 8TH BOARD MEETING.

>> GENERAL MR. SMITH, COULD YOU PLEASE STOP INTERRUPTING? POUR WATER.

IS THERE A POINT OF ORDER TO YOU PLEASE STOP INTERRUPTING CONSTANTLY.

>> WE KEEP LOSING OUR AS A POINT OF WATER. I'M NOT ENTERTAINING IT BECAUSE

YOU'RE JUST CONSTANTLY DISRUPTIVE TO THE MEETING, SIR. >> THAT MOTION FAILED.

>> THAT WAS THE ORIGINAL MOTION. IT'S TIME TO MOVE TO THE NEXT

AGENDA ITEM. I'LL HAVE MY AGENDA ITEM. >> THANK YOU SIR.

I WOULD LIKE TO WORK WITH THE REPORT TO SHOW THAT THE MOTION THAT I MADE A FAILED IT DIDN'T

GET A SECOND. >> SO IT DOESN'T GO INTO THE. IT DOES NOT GO INTO THE MEETING MINUTES. THE MEETING MINUTES ARE ACTION, SIR.

AND IT DIDN'T. THANK YOU. I'M ASKING FOR NOW MORE WHEN MANY WERE MINUTES FILLED WITH MOTIONS FEEL THAT I WILL WANT THAT MADE THE MOTION I FEEL TO BE A PART OF THE ACTUAL THAT THERE TO BE A PART OF THE ACTUAL NOTES BECAUSE THAT MOTIONS YOUR NOTES THEY ARE WHEN MOTION FAILS WHETHER IT PASSES OR FAILS IT'S ALWAYS A

PART OF THE OFFICIAL NOTES AND MARK. >> ALL RIGHT, WE'RE ON TO THE

[Setting December 8, 2020 Board Meeting Agenda]

RECOGNIZED YES OR CAN GET IT UP . >> THANK YOU FOR SURE.

>> DR. RODRIGUEZ, WOULD IT BE POSSIBLE FOR US TO HAVE AN UPDATE ON THE EIGHT OUTSTANDING

[00:20:02]

MUTED. WHEN DO YOU READ IT? >> I DON'T KNOW WHAT I CAN SAY MYSELF ON THE CAMERA BUT I CAN'T GET A CAMERA. BUT ANYWAY, AS FAR AS GIVING

YOU AN UPDATE, I THINK IT'S A PUBLIC RECORD. >> I'M THE ONE I'M LED BETTER BUT I DON'T KNOW ABOUT THE WHAT WERE THE CASES YOU'RE ASKING ABOUT MR. SCHECK TO WENDY ARE A LOOMIS LAB BETTER JAMMING JOHN DOE IT BE A CHANCE TO WANTED JAMES JANICE BARNWELL, GERRY HENDERSON CHRISTINE TERRY GEORGE NEE SIR THOSE WOULD BE ONLY EIGHT AND PERHAPS SOME OF THEM HAVE BEEN SETTLED AT THAT WOULD BE A DISCUSSION I SUPPOSE FOR EXECUTIVE SESSION.

>> THOSE ARE THE ONES I GOT ON THE WEBSITE THAT'LL SO I CAN I CAN CHECK ON SOME.

>> I'LL BE GLAD TO CHECK ON THOSE CASES BUT RIGHT NOW SOME OF THOSE CASE LIKE THE LOOMIS CASE I MEAN THIS IS PUBLIC INFORMATION. THAT'S THE WHOLE WORLD CAN HEAR. BUT YOU KNOW THE LOOMIS CASE, WENDY, I DON'T THINK IT'S

APPROPRIATE TO DISCUSS IT NOW BUT I'M. >> MY REQUEST WOULD BE FOR EXECUTIVE SESSION. NO REQUEST. I JUST WANT EVERYBODY TO NOTE THAT A LOT OF THIS INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR ALREADY.

SO BUT I'LL BE GLAD TO LOOK INTO IT FURTHER. I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT I WAS CLEAR THAT NO MY SOURCE CHECK A LOT OF THIS INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE ON THE PUBLIC WEB SITE ACTUALLY SO BADLY IS CORRECT. A LOT OF IT.

SO YES, THAT'S HOW I KNOW THE NAMES. BUT ARE YOU SAYING THIS WOULD BE BETTER APPROPRIATE A DISCUSSION FOR OPEN SESSION? NO, I'M JUST SAYING THAT SOME OF THESE THINGS I DON'T REALLY AND SOME OF THESE CASES FOR EXAMPLE, IF I CAN JUST FINISH WHAT I WAS SAYING WAS THAT LOOMIS IN THAT CASE YOU KNOW, EVERYBODY KNOWS BECAUSE IT'S A

PUBLIC RECORD. >> BUT THAT CASE IS STILL IN THE PROCESS OF DISCOVERY.

YOU SAID I'M SAYING. SO I MEAN SOME OF THIS I DON'T REALLY HAVE ANYTHING TO REPORT ON BECAUSE IT'S PROCEED. I DON'T HAVE ANY MORE WATER ANYWHERE.

>> I THINK THAT THAT SHOULD BE SAID IN THE EXECUTIVE SESSION OR I THINK THIS KIND OF CONVERSATION SHOULD BE SHOULD BE EXECUTIVE SESSION EXACTLY WHAT DOJ IS SAYING EVEN IF IT ISN'T ALTHOUGH ONCE SHE SAID THAT IS PUBLIC NOT I THINK THAT THAT WAS ENOUGH BUT TO GO INTO DETAIL. I THINK WHAT WE ARE FURTHER ALONG IN THE CONVERSATION TO GIVE I'M NOT GOING TO DISCLOSE ANYTHING THAT'S CONFIDENTIAL. MR. MAYOR.

I JUST ALWAYS WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT I COMPLY WITH THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT THAT I ALWAYS GIVE PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. SO I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT THAT WE BE VERY TRANSPARENT WITH THE PUBLIC. THAT'S ALL I'M TRYING TO DO. MR. O'BRIEN, THE QUESTION AT

HAND IS SHOULD THESE CASES BE ADDED TO EXECUTIVE SESSION? >> SO SHOULD WE PUT A PLACE HOLDER IN FOR REPORTS ON OUTSTANDING CASES OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT?

>> AND I'LL BE I GUESS I'LL BE GLAD TO CHECK WITH SOME OF THESE CASES ARE ARE HANDLED BY OUTSIDE COUNSEL SO I CAN FIND OUT FROM THEM IF THERE IS ANY UPDATE FOR ME TO GIVE YOU

AND I KNOW IF THERE IS I'D BE GLAD TO DO IT. >> SO LET'S SOUNDS LIKE A REASONABLE PLACE HOLDER WOULD BE 15 MINUTES. DOES THAT SOUND RIGHT, WENDY? YES. OK. AND DR. RODRIGUEZ, THE EXECUTIVE SESSION THE EMPLOYMENT MATTER, THE PERSONAL RATIFICATION REPORT 15 MINUTES.

SO LEAVE IT AT 530 OR DO YOU HAVE THINK THAT THE EMPLOYMENT MATTER EXCUSE ME THE PERSONNEL

RATIFICATION REPORT IS MORE AND MORE LENGTHY MUTED OR MUTED? >> SORRY.

>> THANK YOU. SORRY ABOUT THAT. I THINK 15 MINUTES IS FINE.

ALL RIGHT. SO THAT MEANS WE'LL LEAVE THE TIME AT 530 AND WE'LL HAVE A PLACE HOLDER FOR THE LEGAL UPDATE. MR. SMITH, TO BE QUITE HONEST, A BOARD MEMBER WAS ASKING FOR LEGAL UPDATES OR SOME OF THOSE CASES I SHOULD JUST CALLED OUT OUR I'M NOT AWARE OF THOSE CASES. SO I THINK AT THIS TIME I WOULD LIKE TO POSSIBLY KNOW IF I NEED TO MAKE HIM MAKE A MOTION THAT WE THAT WE HAVE THAT WE GET THAT WE GIVE IT GET AN UPDATE FROM THE SUPERINTENDENT ON EXACT ONLY ON THESE LEGAL CASES

[00:25:07]

SO IT'S ABOUT PLAYING IN EXECUTIVE SESSION. >> I WOULD LIKE A LEGAL UPDATE ON ANY ON ANY PENDING LITIGATION THAT WE HAVE GOING ON WITH THE DISTRICT AND THEN THE DISTRICT DYNAMIC EMOTIONS. WOULD YOU NOT ONLY MAKE A MOTION TO THAT BUT YET I MAKE A MOTION THAT THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION THAT ANY PENDING LITIGATION THAT THE DISTRICT HAVE THAT WE CAN BE DONE AT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION. YES.

AND WITH ALL DUE RESPECT, MR. SMITH, I HAVE ALWAYS INFORMED YOU WHEN THERE'S BEEN A NEW

LAWSUIT FILED. DO WE HAVE A SECOND? >> I'LL SECOND IT FOR DISCUSSION. MOTION THAT THERE'LL BE AN UPDATE ON ANY PENDING LEGAL THE

PENDING LITIGATION. >> WHAT IT SEEMS LIKE THIS MOTION WOULD STILL ALLOW WENDY TO DETERMINE WHAT WAS APPROPRIATE FOR EXECUTIVE SESSION AND WHAT WOULD NO EXIT

EXECUTIVE SESSION. >> I'LL BE GLAD TO UPDATE THE BOARD ON ALL PENDING LITIGATION

AND EXECUTIVE SESSION. >> THE LAST TIME I WAS ASKED TO DO THAT I DID PROVIDE THAT

INFORMATION. MR. O'BRIEN. >> YEAH, THIS WAS THE INTENT OF THE PLACE HOLDER. I THOUGHT WHEN WE WERE PUTTING THE PLACE TOLD YOU IT WAS TO GET THIS INFORMATION. SO MR. SMITH, YOU KNOW I TO ITS MOTION TO ME I THINK THIS IS DIFFERENT BECAUSE I'M I'M REQUESTING THE SUPERINTENDENT THAT HE BRING FORTH ANY IN ANY LITIGATION THAT WE THAT THE DISTRICT HAS RIGHT NOW ON THE BOOKS THAT HE'S BREAKING BRIEFS

THAT HE BRINGS THAT FOR AND GIVE US AN UPDATE ON IT. >> SO ANY AND EVERY AND ALL THE ADDITIONS THAT WE HAVE RIGHT NOW GOING ON THE DISTRICT I'M ASKING THE SUPERINTENDENT TO BRING THIS AND GIVE IT AND GIVE US AND GIVE US AN UPDATE ON IT. SO HORRENDOUS.

MRS. COURT IS REACHING OUT DESPERATE. HIS DIRECTION TO HAVE HIM IN HIS COLLEGE, REACH OUT TO THE OTHER TURNINGS OR HAVE ATTORNEYS COME TO THE BOARD AND GIVE US AN UPDATE RIGHT AT THIS TIME. THAT'S WHAT I'M ASKING FOR.

SO BEFORE WE WISH YOU WELL PLACE ORDERS OPTIONAL I'M ASKING I'M ASKING US TO DIRECT

THE SUPERINTENDENT'S TO TO DO THAT SO AS TO US ALL. >> I'LL PLAY OUR LIST.

DO WE I MEAN IT SEEMS TO ME THE WAY I INTERPRETED YOUR PLACE HOLDER IS THAT WE PUT THERE AND WE DO IT. OKATIE WE DON'T. IT DIDN'T MATTER.

SO TO ME THIS PUT MORE TEETH INTO IT. SO MISS I'M PUSHING BACK.

COULD YOU PLEASE PUT UP MR. SMITH'S MOTION HOW TO SEE MISS ROBUST AS OUR HAND UP JUST A MINUTE PLEASE. SO NOW YOU'VE CHANGED THIS TO UPDATE FROM DR. RODRIGUEZ.

YOU WANT TO ADD TO THIS. >> I SAID I SAID FROM THE SUPERINTENDENT AND I SAID I SAID WHEN I FIRST MADE THE MOTION I SAID WELL CAN YOU LOOK AT IT HERE, WILLIAM AND FIX IT

THE WAY YOU WANTED IT? IF YOU GIVE ME A SECOND. >> I WAS READING YOU AND YOU STOPPED ME THE MESSAGE ME READING IT. THANK YOU.

>> I SAID THAT I MADE THE MOST I MAKE A MOTION THAT WE ASKED DR. REGUS TO GIVE US AN UPDATE

ON ANY PENDING LITIGATION IN EXECUTIVE SESSION. >> THAT WAS THE MOTION.

>> SO ROBIN, TO MAKE THAT EQUIVALENT TO WHAT WILLIAM SAID MOTION THAT THERE'D BE AN UPDATE GIVEN BY THE SUPERINTENDENT. IT NEEDS TO BE ADDED AFTER

UPDATE. >> I HAVE MOTION THAT THAT THE RODRIGUEZ GIVE AN UPDATE ON ANY PENDING LITIGATION. YEAH. AND THE DISTRICT MOTION THAT DR. RODRIGUEZ GIVEN UPDATE ON ANY PENDING LITIGATION IN THE DISTRICT IN EXECUTIVE SESSION.

>> EXCUSE ME, ROBIN. >> EXCUSE ME ACTUALLY CAN YOU CHANGE ANY ARE ANY IN ALL BECAUSE HE COULD JUST GIVE US ANYONE BUT CAN WE HAVE ANY COULD WE HAVE ANY? BECAUSE WE HAVE ALL THANK YOU AS KEEN AS YOU CAN TAKE OUT ANY ACTUALLY YOU CAN TAKE OUT YOU

[00:30:08]

CAN TAKE WORD ANY ARE ANY OUT OK? >> THANK YOU.

ALL RIGHT. THERE BEING NO THEIR HANDS UP ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY I I.

ALL THOSE OPPOSED OPPOSED. ALL RIGHT. THE MOTION CARRIES TEAM ARE YOU OPPOSING? YES. OK, I'M NO.

ALL RIGHT. SO WE CAN BRING BACK UP THE UH. HERE IT COMES TO THE LIAR THAT

REALLY IS A LITTLE BIT SLOWER THAN ALL RIGHT. >> SO THAT'S GONNA GO AS THE SECOND ITEM UNDER EXECUTIVE SESSION UNTIL WE REALLY THE TIME TO 30.

DR. RODRIGUEZ SINCE YES. THIS IS YOUR RESPONSIBILITY. 15 MINUTES.

WENDY, CAN YOU COVER IT IN 15? >> I THINK SO. I THINK I CAN DO THAT.

I'LL DO MY VERY BEST AND I'LL DO MY AB DO MY BEST TO GET ON RIGHT AWAY.

THANK YOU, MR. O'BRIEN. >> YES. I JUST WANT TO MAKE A STATEMENT. I THINK WE PROBABLY NEED TO MAKE THE LANGUAGE UNDER EXECUTIVE SESSION BOYER COMPLIANT. ONCE WE FIGURE OUT WHAT EXACTLY IS GOING TO BE SHARED WITH YEAH I'LL SHARE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION GETS TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT OF ABOUT PENDING LEGAL MATTERS OK. SO I'LL BE ON A DATE WITH THE LAW. YES. THANK YOU FOR SAYING.

>> BECAUSE IN THE PAST WE'VE ALWAYS HAD THESE DISCUSSIONS AND THEN WITH THE RECOGNITION THAT YOU'RE GOING TO ADD LEGAL OILY LANGUAGE AND I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT EVERYONE UNDERSTANDS THAT WE DO LEAVE THAT UP TO YOU TO ADD THE LEGAL FOIL LANGUAGE AFTER WE COMPLETE THE AGENDA. THAT'S RIGHT. MR. SMITH, I WAS GOING TO SAY

MAYBE WE SHOULD START WITH FIVE TWIN. >> YOU GIVE TWO TO MOMENT TO MOMENT. SO THERE'S MAYBE A FIVE 20 THAT'S FINE WITH ME.

>> BE SURE WE HAVE A FEW MINUTES BETWEEN THE EXECUTIVE SESSION AND THE MEETING.

>> RIGHT. ARE YOU GOOD WITH THAT, KATHY? YEAH.

OK, SO FIVE 20 PLEASE. NEXT WE HAVE THE PUBLIC SESSION STARTING AT 6.

THE POINTS OF CELEBRATION ARE THE NOVEMBER STUDENTS OF THE MONTH RECOGNITION FOR MRS. FRIEDA MITCHELL AND WE'RE HAVING A RESOLUTION CORRECT. PREPARE TO MAKE A PROCLAMATION.

CORRECT. OK, THANK YOU. >> GIRLS HANDS UP.

>> MR. CAMPBELL. CAMPBELL. DO WE NEED ANY MORE HEROES OR

TO BE? >> YEAH, I THINK IT WOULD BE NICE TO THEY WON'T BE ABLE TO BE IN PERSON BECAUSE WE'RE STILL NOT OPEN TO THE PUBLIC SINCE THE SCHOOLS ARE HERE.

BUT THEY COULD. WE CAN SEND THEM. I DON'T REALLY GET THERE CONTACT INFORMATION SO WE COULD INVITE THEM. I'LL ASK THEM TO GET THEIR E-MAILS. YEAH. YEAH.

WELL IF YOU GIVE THE EMAIL ADDRESS OR GIVE THEM TO ROBIN WE CAN INVITE THEM TO JOIN THE MEETING. OKAY. ALL RIGHT.

OKAY. THANK YOU. >> UNDER THE.

>> AND THEN WE HAVE THE FIRST PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THE CHAIR REPORT.

THE LEGISLATIVE MEETING REPORT AND THE RECOGNITION THAT RECOGNITIONS IT SHOULD BE

RECOGNITION. >> YES. TAKE OFF THE S ADD A F.

RECOGNITION TAKE THAT INTO OK. THANK YOU, MR. CAMPBELL. OH I THINK YOUR HAND DIDN'T GO DOWN. THANK YOU, EARL. THEN WE HAVE THE TWO SETS OF MINUTES UNDER BOARD BUSINESS ACTION. WE HAVE THE PRESENTATION AND

[00:35:07]

WE ALSO HAVE THE ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE LOCAL BOARD APPROVED COURSES AND THE APPROVAL OF A TESTING WAIVER FOR PAPER PENCIL AND A TESTING WINDOW. MR. SMITH ALSO ALSO WE NEED TO ADD MRS. CUSHING BURIES HER HER ARE OBVIOUSLY NOT WITH THE EXECUTIVE ASSISTANTS EXECUTIVE ASSISTANTS EVALUATION TO THIS AS WELL BECAUSE WE WAS BROUGHT AS OPPOSED TO HAVE IT AT THE WORK. SO SHE BECAME IT LOOKS LIKE WE MIGHT BE WE'VE MISSED IT A SO AND SO WE NEED TO GO MAKE SURE THAT THAT IS DONE SO THAT SO THAT CAN BE GIVEN TO HER SO THAT THAT NEEDS TO BE ON ON THIS AGENDA HERE SO SPECIFICALLY THAT THE THE THE

EVALUATION TO YES. >> SO YOU'RE ASKING TO REVISE THE EVALUATION.

THE ESMA THAT YOU HAD THAT AT THE AUGUST WORK SESSION, MISS WHAT WE BROUGHT TO YOU AND YOU CAN'T REVISE IT FOR THIS YEAR. YEAH BECAUSE WHAT WAS TOLD AND THAT'S WHAT WHILE WE'RE TOLD IN AUGUST AT THE WORKING SESSION THAT'S DUST THAT'S NOT TRUE BECAUSE IT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE ON THE LAST WORK WAS POSSIBLE THE LAST WORK SESSION AND WE AND WE'VE BEEN PUTTING ON IT IT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE ON THE TO DO LIST BECAUSE WHAT WE SAID THAT WE WERE GOING TO PUT ON THE WORK SESSION. SO THAT'S NOT THERE. THAT'S NOT WHAT MY MEMORY MY MEMORY IS THAT WAS POSSIBLE IN THE LAST WORK SESSION BECAUSE WE WE WE ARE FIRST WE PUT IT ON THE ON THE AGENDA AND THEN WE MOVE INTO THE WORK SESSIONS SO THAT THAT'S THAT'S MY RIBAUT THAT'S MY REMEMBRANCE OF IT AND WE WE DIDN'T WE DIDN'T DO IT. SO.

SO THAT'S WHY I'M ASKING FOR IT FOR WAITING FOR IT TO BE BROUGHT FORWARD.

MISS CUSHING VERY WHAT WAS PUT ON THAT AUGUST WORK SESSION WAS THE AGENDA YOU TRIED TO CHANGE IT IN THE DISCUSSION WAS YOU CANNOT CHANGE THE AGENDA THE THE AGENDA I'M SORRY THE EVALUATION IN THE MIDDLE OF THE YEAR WHAT YOU MIGHT BE SUGGESTING IS CHANGING THE EVALUATION FOR NEXT YEAR. BUT MISS WALTON INFORMED YOU ALL THAT THE EVALUATION HAS BEEN CHANGED AND IS IN IT AND IT IS A DOCUMENT SO WHAT YOU SHOULD BE EVALUATING ME ON IS THE EVALUATION THAT WAS APPROVED THAT HAD ALREADY BEEN CHANGED THAT DOES NOT GO ON A BOARD MEETING THAT IS DONE BY YOU GATHERING THAT DOCUMENT FROM THIS WALTON PASSING OUT TO THE BOARD MEMBERS AND THEN THE OFFICERS MEET WITH ME ONCE THE BOARD TURNS INTO THE EVALUATION . I CONCUR WITH ROBIN'S ANALYSIS AND IT SEEMS LIKE YOU SIT NOW CHANGING THE DOCUMENT FOR THE UPCOMING YEAR AFTER THIS AFTER THIS EVALUATION IS COMPLETED THAT WOULD BE SOMETHING THAT WOULD BE MORE APPROPRIATE TO BRING BEFORE THE NEW BOARD AFTER THIS EVALUATION IS COMPLETED. BUT YOU CAN'T CHANGE THE DOCUMENT MIDSTREAM. THAT'S KIND OF WHAT YOU'RE ASKING TO DO.

NO, IT'S NOT WHAT I'M ASKING. >> WELL, EXPLAIN IT THEN. >> HOW WHAT YOU ARE ASKING TO DO. I'M ASKING THAT OFF WHEN THE WINDOW WHEN DO WE GIVE OUT HER? WHEN DO WE WHEN DO WE WHEN DO WE GIVE OUT THE EXECUTIVE ASSISTANTS NEW EVALUATION TO YOU MEAN TO WHEN DO WHEN DO WE GIVE IT TO INDIVIDUAL BOARD MEMBERS TO FILL OUT NO.

WHEN DO WE GIVE OUT THE EXECUTIVE ASSISTANCE? ABOUT WISHING TO FOR NEXT YEAR

WHEN DO WHEN DO WE DO THAT? >> ISN'T IT COMING NOW? IT'S NEXT YEAR.

>> YOU HAVE TO DO THE EVALUATION FOR THIS YEAR. RIGHT.

WHICH WE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSING AND YOU WOULD NEED TO GET THAT INSTRUMENT FOR THIS YEAR FROM MISS WALTON. YOU WOULD DISTRIBUTE IT TO THE BOARD MEMBERS THEN YOU WOULD SET UP A TIME TO MEET WITH ME ONCE THE BOARD MEMBERS HAVE COMPLETED FOR THIS YEAR.

>> NO. HOW I REMEMBER IT WAS HOW I REMEMBER IT WAS WHAT HAPPENED WAS WE WAS A POLL WE USUALLY WE WERE SUPPOSED TO GIVE OUT THE EXECUTIVE ASSISTANCE EVALUATION TOOL FOR NEXT YEAR. THE TWO THAT SHE WOULD BE EVALUATED BY ME THAT HE OR SHE WOULD BE EVALUATED BY DISH WITHIN ME WITHIN THESE TWO MONTHS OR SO BECAUSE I BELIEVE

[00:40:04]

BUT THE TOOL TO BE WORKED ON BECAUSE OF THE TIMEFRAME SO THAT THE FOLLOWING YEAR THAT THE EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT WOULD KNOW EXACTLY WHAT THEY WERE GOING TO BE EVALUATED ON.

I'M NOT TRYING TO CHANGE IT MAKE CHANGES FOR THIS EVALUATION THAT WE'RE ABOUT TO DO. I'M TRYING TO I'M TRYING PREPARATION AND TO MAKE CHANGES FOR THE FOLLOWING EVALUATION AND THAT IS WHAT WE WILL SUPPORT.

THAT WAS SUPPOSED TO SCHEDULE AND ALL OF A SUDDEN IT DISAPPEARED.

>> OKAY. THAT'S THE PROBLEM. OKAY.

SO YOU'RE INTERESTED NOW ON THIS AGENDA TO CHANGE ROBBINS EVALUATION TOOL FOR HER

EVALUATION IN THE TWENTY TWENTY ONE YEAR. >> RIGHT.

SO SHE CAN KNOWS BECAUSE THE DEALS ARE IMPORTANT POINT TIME WHERE SHE'S SUPPOSED TO BE GIVEN WHAT SHE WHAT THE EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT IS GOING TO EVALUATE IT ON.

THERE'S A TIMEFRAME THAT THAT PERSON THAT THAT IS THE EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT IS SUPPOSED TO HAVE THE INFORMATION IN FRONT OF THEM SO THEY CAN KNOW EXACTLY WHAT THEY GONNA BE EVALUATED ON. I DON'T KNOW WHY SHE LIKES SOMEONE WHO'S HAD AMNESIA BUT I REMEMBER I REMEMBER THAT I REMEMBER DISCUSSING THIS RIGHT OUT BECAUSE I REMEMBER YOU SEE USED MADAM CHAIR, YOU SAID SPECIFICALLY CAN WORKED ON IT AND YOU DIDN'T WANT TO BE THE ONE AND WE WANT TO REVISIT IT. MISS AIDES TOLD YOU THAT AT THE AUGUST WORK SESSION IT WAS

AUGUST 21. >> POINT OF ORDER. ORDER IS SO HARD YOU GOT TO PUT IT THAT ONE QUARTER POINT OF ORDER ABOUT GREAT ANNOUNCER AND YOU RECOGNIZE RIBAUT AND

YOU RECOGNIZE THE YES, I'LL RECOGNIZE KATHY NOW. >> THANK YOU.

NO, MA'AM, I'M SURE THE QUESTION WAS ASKED DID YOU RECOGNIZE CHRISTINE BECAUSE SHE WAS TALKING AND IF I DID THAT YOU WOULD TELL ME WOULD BE WHAT THEY CALL ME.

>> YOU HAVE AN ELECTRONIC HAND TOO THAT YOU CAN PUT UP AS THE HOST.

YES, SHE DOES. I'M ASKING ROBIN SIR ROBIN. YES, THOSE I FIND IT I'LL PUT IT UP BECAUSE YOU'RE IN MY VIEW I THINK AS A WHOLE I CAN BUT I WILL RAISE MY HAND SO THAT YOU

COULD SEE ME. >> BUT THE PROBLEM IS YOUR VIEW.

I DON'T ALWAYS HAVE YOUR WINDOW . ALL RIGHT.

LET'S HAVE A LET'S HAVE A VOTE ON THIS BECAUSE MR. SMITH, I THINK YOU AND WE HAVE DIFFERENT VIEWS OF WHAT EXACTLY HAS ALREADY TRANSPIRED. KATHY, WOULD YOU LIKE TO SAY SOMETHING BEFORE WE VOTE ON WHETHER WE'RE ADDING A REVISION OF ROBIN'S EVALUATION INSTRUMENT TO THE AGENDA? YES, I THINK THERE IS. BEEN A MISUNDERSTANDING HERE.

THIS IS I KNOW WILLIAM HAS BEEN WANTED WANTING TO REVISIT THE EVALUATION TOOL AND I DON'T KNOW HOW WILLIAM. WE ALL DROPPED THE BALL ON THAT IN TERMS OF GIVING IT ON THE WORK SESSION AGENDA. WE WERE ALL AT THAT MEETING. AND IT SLIPPED THROUGH THE CRACKS. SO WE CAN'T GO BACK AND DO THAT.

WE WERE ALL THREE OF US WERE THERE. SO IT'S KIND OF LIKE HOW DID THAT GET FORGOTTEN? I DON'T KNOW. BUT.

SO THE I THINK WE'VE GOT TWO THINGS THAT WE REALLY THAT NEED TO HAPPEN.

ONE ROBBINS EVALUATION FOR THE 19 20 FOR THIS YEAR THAT ENDS SOON IN DECEMBER.

THAT EVALUATION GOT TO BE DONE. AND WE HAVE TO USE THE TOOL THAT WE USED BEFORE BECAUSE WE CAN'T GIVE HER A NEW TOOL MIDWAY THROUGH THROUGH THE STREAM, WHICH IS WHAT WILLIAMS SAYING. AND BEFORE I WAS UNDER THE IMPRESSION THAT YOU WANTED TO

CHANGE IT MIDSTREAM, I I I WASN'T CLEAR ON THAT. >> I AM NOW CLEAR ON THAT.

SO I THINK THAT WE NEED TO I THINK THAT WE NEED TO GET THAT EVALUATION INSTRUMENT DELIVERED TO THE BOARD MEMBERS, THE ONE THAT'S CURRENTLY OUT THERE AND I I THINK THAT IN THE THE JOB

DESCRIPTIONS OF OFFICERS IT'S NOT NOT MY RESPONSIBLE. >> BUT I ALSO THINK THAT THAT BECAME THAT IN JANUARY WE SHOULD HAVE A MEETING RIGHT AWAY TO DEVELOP THE NEW INDUSTRIES, SEE WHAT MR. SMITH'S CONCERNS ARE WITH THE INSTRUMENT.

>> WE WILL HAVE USE THE INSTRUMENT AGAIN FOR THE SECOND TIME.

SO I THINK THAT WILL GIVE EVERYONE UP FAMILIAR MAKE US MORE FAMILIAR WITH IT AGAIN AND

[00:45:02]

>> MR. SMITH MRS. ROE BY TWO TO OUR DEGREE I DO AGREE WITH YOU. >> I AGREE WITH YOU.

THAT IS WHAT IS THAT IS THE PROCESS THAT WE WERE SUPPOSED TO HER EXACT WHO WAS SUPPOSED TO DO IT. BUT I WAS SAYING WAS THAT THE REASON WHY WE NEED TO DO IT AT THE WORK SESSION SO THAT WHEN WE GIVE HER THE HEART HERB ALLISON FOR THIS TIME OWEN WILL MEET BACK WITH HER AND GIVE HER HER RESULTS THEN WE CAN LET THAT TIME LET HER KNOW WHAT THE WHAT THE NEW OR WHETHER THESE ISSUES WOULD BE THE WHAT WHAT WOULD BE THE TOOL THAT THEY WILL USE. WELL, THAT WOULD BE USED FOR THE FOLLOWING YEAR AND THAT'S MY RECOLLECTION OF IT. EXACTLY WHAT EXACTLY THAT IS WHAT IS WHAT THEIR RECOLLECTION IS. AND SO THAT'S WHY IT WAS IMPORTANT THAT WE WE GET IT AT A BOARD MEETING NOW OR THAT WE DID IT AT SESSION AND IT'S STILL NOT TOO LATE TO GET IT DONE AT THE BOARD MEETING. I DON'T SEE WHY. WHY CAN'T WE PASS UP THE TOOL AND I'LL PUT IT ON BOARD DOCS AND ANY CHANGE THAT NEED TO BE MADE THAT CAN BE MADE THAT A NEXT AT THE BOARD MEETING. I DON'T SEE OUR PROBLEM WHERE WE'RE PUTTING THE ACTUAL TOOL AND THE AND BOARD DOCS IN ANY IN ANY CASE ANY CHANGES THAT NEED TO BE MADE CAN BE MADE THERE. THERE ARE SOME MINOR CHANGES THAT POSSIBLY NEED TO BE MADE.

AND HE THOSE THROUGH THOSE CHANGES COULD BE MADE AT THE NEXT BOARD MEETING.

SO ONCE WE'VE DONE ONE ONCE WE DO THE EVALUATION THIS MONTH AT THE END THEN WE CAN GO AHEAD AND GIVE THE EVALUATION TO THESE KIND OF THE TO THE EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT AS WELL.

GIVE THE EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT THE NEW TO FOR THE FOLLOWING YEAR THAT'S THAT THAT'S THAT'S THAT'S THAT'S THAT'S WHAT I THAT'S WHAT I'M PROPOSING MR. CAMPBELL EARLIER MUTED MR.

CAMPBELL YOUR MUTED YOU ON MUTE HIM ROBIN. >> NOW HE HAS TO MUTE HIMSELF.

EARL, YOU TURN THE CAMERA OFF INSTEAD OF MEETING YOURSELF. WELL WHILE HE'S FIGURING THAT OUT WELL I THINK WHAT WORD IT SEEMS AS KATHY'S POINTED OUT WELL THERE'S TWO ISSUES HERE.

THERE'S THE NEED TO DO THE CURRENT EVALUATION THAT WOULD COVER THIS PAST.

IT WOULD REALLY BE FROM THE FALL OF OF 2000. IT WOULD BE THE SCHOOL SCHOOL YEAR OF 2009 CLAIM CORRECT. SO IT'D BE THE LAST. BASICALLY 12 MONTHS OR SO.

THAT'S ONE. THE SECOND ISSUE IS YOU ARE INTERESTED, MR. SMITH, IN POTENTIALLY CHANGING THE EVALUATION INSTRUMENT FOR THE FOLLOWING YEAR THE SCHOOL YEAR OF 20 THAT WOULD BE 20 ONE. SO I IT SEEMS TO ME THAT YOU'RE PUTTING THE CART BEFORE THE HORSE. WE NEED TO GET FIRST DONE THIS EVALUATION AS MISS ROWE BINH IS STATED SO WE WILL HAVE USE THE EVALUATION INSTRUMENT TWICE AND THEN THE BOARD CAN DECIDE DOES IT WANT TO CHANGE THE INSTRUMENT AND THE IT'S AS I'VE ALREADY POINTED OUT DURING THIS MEETING THAT SEEMS LIKE THAT WOULD BE BETTER COVERED BY THE NEW BOARD BECAUSE THEY'LL BE THE ONES THAT WILL BE USING THE INSTRUMENT GOING FORWARD. THEY WON'T BE DOING THE CURRENT EVALUATION. MR. EARL CAMPBELL, YOU'RE JUST GOING TO SAY THAT YOU HAVE A NEW BOARD MEMBER COMING ON AND IT WOULD BE BETTER HOPED TO MAKE SURE THEY'RE INVOLVED IN

THIS AND THAT. THANK YOU, MR. SMITH. >> ALL DUE RESPECT, I UNDERSTAND THAT WE HAVE NEW BOARD MEMBERS COMING COMING ON BOARD.

BUT RIGHT NOW THEY ARE KIND OF FAIRLY NEW IN THEY ARE NOT FAMILIAR WITH THE FUNCTIONS

[00:50:04]

AND I'VE HAD I'VE HAD A SECONDED BY TWO OTHER BOARD MEMBERS WHO WILL BE WHO WILL STILL BE ON THE SCHOOL ONLY BOARD WHO HAS SAID THAT THEY HAD AGREED THAT THERE WERE THAT THERE WERE SOME THINGS THAT NEED TO BE BRUSHED UP ON AND I'M NOT ASKING FOR US TO CHANGE UP THE WHOLE WHOLE TO SAY THAT THIS ARE THE PARTS OF THE TOOL THAT NEEDS TO BE LOOKED AT.

I DON'T SEE THE HARM IN SENDING THE TOOL OUT AND SAY AND MAKING SOME A COUPLE OF CHANGES AT A BUSINESS MEETING. THAT'S ONE BUSINESS MEETING FOR TAKING CARE OF BUSINESS.

SO I MEAN I'M KIND OF I DON'T IS PUTTING THE CART BEFORE THE HORSE OR WHEN ARE YOU PLANNING ON GIVING CONTACTING MISS WHEN ARE YOU PLANNING ON CONTACTING ALICE WALTON TO GET THE CURRENT EVALUATION TOOL TO DISTRIBUTE TO THE BOARD MEMBERS AND COLLECT SO THEY CAN BE TALLIED AND THEN THE OFFICERS CAN MEET WITH WITH ROBIN AS WE DID LAST YEAR ACTUALLY.

>> ACTUALLY I DON'T WANT TO GO. I DON'T NEED TO CONTACT MRS.. I WANT YOU TO CONTACT MRS. WALTON FOR THAT. I CAN CONTACT MRS. CUSHING BUT I BELIEVE AND HAVE AS IS CUSTOMARY SINCE THAT SAME SEND THAT SAME E-MAIL THAT WAS SENT OUT LAST YEAR TO TWO TO THE BOARD MEMBERS. SO I WANT YOU TO CONTACT MS. ONE FOR ANYTHING BECAUSE CONTACT THEM IS WHAT I WANT I DOWN TO SPEAK TO THE SUPERINTENDENT ABOUT THAT BECAUSE THAT IS HIS EMPLOYEE. SO SO THAT I THINK THAT WOULD BE OUT OF ORDER FOR ME.

JUST CONTACT MRS. WALTON, MR. CHRISTIAN BERRY'S EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT.

I THINK IT WOULD BE IT'S OUR JOB TO DEAL WITH MRS. CUSHING BETTER THAN ME THAN MRS. WALTON

. >> CATHY. SO I HAVE NO IT AS A CHAIR.

HOW WHAT WHAT'S BEEN PAST PRACTICE BECAUSE PAST PRAISE I THINK THAT MRS. PASS PRACTICE THAT MRS. ROWE BONDED WAY LIKE MISERABLE DYING I MISERABLE BEIN WAS IN CHARGE OF WHEN WHEN

MISS CUSHING BERRY HAD A PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PLAN. >> THAT'S WHAT SHE WAS IN CHARGE. RIGHT. CATHY, DO YOU WANT TO ADDRESS? YES. DO YOU HAVE ANY SUGGESTIONS FOR WHERE SEEM TO BE REACHING A

STANDSTILL HERE? >> I THINK WE NEED A MOTION TO ADD THE TOPIC OF ALTERING OR WHATEVER WORD YOU WANT TO USE TO THIS. IF WE'RE GOING TO ADD THAT TOPIC, I THINK WE NEED TO VOTE ON IT BECAUSE IT SEEMS LIKE WE HAVE VERY DIFFERENT VIEWS ABOUT

ABOUT THAT AT THIS TIME. >> ROBBINS RAISING HER AND THANK YOU, ROBIN.

>> YOU DO NEED TO CONTACT MISS WALTON. THE EVALUATION IS IN THE H.R.

DEPARTMENT. SHE'S THE ONE WHO IS RESPONSIBLE.

SHE IS THE ONE WHO WILL PROVIDE TO THE OFFICER WHO REQUESTED DOES NOT COME FROM ME AND I DO NOT DISTRIBUTE MY OWN EVALUATION TO THE BOARD MEMBERS.

SO MISS WALTON IS THE ONE THAT YOU DO NEED TO CONTACT AND GET THE INSTRUMENT FROM.

>> AND FURTHER, MR. SMITH MS. >> CUSHING BERRY IS NOT SUPERVISED BY DR. RODRIGUEZ.

MISS CUSHING VARIOUS SUPERVISED BY THE BOARD CHAIR. SO WE DO NOT GO THROUGH DR.

RODRIGUEZ, SIR? NO, THAT'S NOT WHERE I SAID I DO ACTUALLY ACTUALLY.

CORRECT. SEE ONCE AGAIN YOU ARE WRONG. I SAID THAT MRS. WALTON IS IS MRS. WALTON IS UNDER THE SUPER, SUPER INTENSE DIRECTION INTO CONTACT MISS WALTON.

I LEAVE GO TO THE SUPERINTENDENT. THAT'S ALL.

THAT'S WHY I SAID I SAID MOVE. I SAID MRS. CUSHING. BUT WORKS FOR THE BOARD.

THAT'S WHAT I SAID. IF YOU GO BACK LISTEN TO THE MINUTES I SAID IT CORRECTLY.

THAT'S WHY I SAY IT FOR THE RECORD. YEAH.

I'M NOT GOING TO SIT HERE AND ARGUE WITH YOU, SIR. MR. OBAMA'S EMINENCE, CAN YOU

DO. >> I'M JUST I'M JUST CORRECTING YOU BECAUSE SOMETIMES SHE'LL MAKE ME SEE I KNOW WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT. SO I'M JUST CORRECTING YOU.

I'M NOT GONNA LET YOU GET AWAY WITH IT THIS TIME. THAT'S ALL.

MR. JACKSON ARE OUT OF CONTROL TODAY. THIS ROW BY SO THIS IS MY

SUGGESTION. >> LET'S WHEN THE INSTRUMENT EVALUATION INSTRUMENT IS SENT OUT TO THE BOARD MEMBERS AT I THINK IT IS THE SECRETARY WHO DOES THAT.

I'M NOT SURE I'D HAVE TO GO BACK AND READ THE JOB DESCRIPTIONS.

YES, IT WAS MY SECRETARY. OK, SO WHEN IT'S SENT OUT TO THE BOARD MEMBERS INCLUDE IN THE DIRECTIONS YOU KNOW WHEN IT HAS TO BE COMPLETED BY WHO? THAT SHOULD BE SENT TO INCLUDE IN THE DIRECTION PLEASE MAKE ANY NOTES OR PLEASE. PLEASE PROVIDE ANY.

THE SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT UPON THIS FORM. YOU'VE JUST DONE IT.

NOW IT'S FRESH IN YOUR MIND. SO PLEASE PROVIDE ANY SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENTS.

[00:55:04]

ON MISS EVALUATION FORM. >> WHEN YOU RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE VICTIM MR. SMITH OR WHATEVER THEN WILLIAM WILL HAVE THAT DATA. THEN THE FIRST BOARD MEETING IN JANUARY WILL HAVE THE DAY ADDER WE CAN BE SHARED WITH EVERYONE WILL KNOW IT SHOULD SHORTEN IT DISCUSSION AND WE CAN MOVE FORWARD SO WE CAN KIND OF DO TWO THINGS AT ONCE.

I THINK THAT WOULD BE. THAT'S WHAT I'M. THAT'S WHAT MAKES SENSE TO ME.

SO WHEN YOU SEND OUT ASK FOR PEOPLE BECAUSE THEY'RE USING IT, YOU KNOW THAT'S WHEN YOU'RE GONNA GET THE BEST FEEDBACK RIGHT BECAUSE YOU'RE USING IT AND YOU CAN SAY TO YOURSELF, OK, I WISH THIS WAS ON HERE. I WISH THIS WASN'T ON HERE. SO THAT'S WHEN PEOPLE WHEN THEY'RE ACTUALLY USING THE INSTRUMENT, THAT'S WHEN PEOPLE WILL COME UP WITH SUGGESTIONS.

SO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THAT. ASK HIM TO WRITE DOWN THEIR SUGGESTIONS.

SEND HIM TO YOU. THAT WOULD BE MY RECOMMENDED RESOURCE CHECK.

OK. >> I THINK WE NEED TO GET BACK TO THE AGENDA SETTING THE AGENDA. IS THERE ANY ITEM THAT WILL GO ON THE AGENDA OUT OF THIS

CONVERSATION? >> AND I JUST WANT TO REMIND EVERYBODY THAT WE'RE BUMPING UP AGAINST THE NEW BOARD MEMBERS SWEARING IN AND MY OFFICERS AND I COULD SEE WHY THEY WANT TO BE THROUGH THIS PROCESS BEFORE THEN. BECAUSE YOU'RE GOING TO RUN INTO THE CHANGING OF THE GUARD AND IT'S GOING TO COMPLICATE MATTERS TOO.

IS THERE AN AGENDA ITEM ON THIS FOR THE NEXT AGENDA? >> I AGREE.

I BRISTLE AT THIS TIME. I MOVE THAT WE DISCUSS THE EVALUATION TOOL FOR THE EXECUTIVE SESSION FOR THE EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT FOR THE 20 TO FOR THE 20 20 21 SCHOOL YEAR

. >> SO YOU'RE SAYING ON THIS AGENDA OF OF OF DECEMBER 8TH? YES, MA'AM. OK. WE HAVE A SECOND A SECOND FOR DISCUSSION. DO WE HAVE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION?

MR. SMITH. >> MS. SHARP JUST BROUGHT UP A GOOD POINT. I THINK THAT IT WOULD IT WOULD BEHOOVE WAS TO GO AHEAD AND GET

THIS DONE TO GO AND GET THEM TO GO AND GET THIS DONE. >> SO WITH THAT WITH THAT BEING SAID, I THINK THAT THAT ONCE AGAIN I'VE STATED THAT THIS BOY HAD HAD HAD EXPERIENCE DEALING WITH THAT WITH THE WITH THE WITH ANY EXECUTIVE SESSION ALL OF THE JOBS AND LEARNING OF THE FUNCTIONS OF AN EXECUTIVE SESSION AND TO KNOW WHAT QUESTIONS POSSIBLY SHOULD BE ASKED. A NEW BOARD MEMBER COMING ON THE BOARD HAVE KIND OF HAS NO IDEA. I MEAN I'M I'M NOT DISCREDITING ANYONE.

MYSELF AS WELL COMING IN. I WOULD NOT KNOW THE FUNCTIONS OF WHAT THAT WHAT THAT PERSON JOB IS, WHO BE AN ATTORNEY RIGHT AWAY. I THINK THIS IS YOU KIND OF COMING IN LINE A LITTLE BIT. SO WITH THAT I THINK THAT'S WHY WOULD BE IT WOULD MAKE MORE SENSE TO GO AHEAD AND GET IT AND GET IT OUT THE WAY. AND I GUESS I THERE ARE TWO OTHER BOARD MEMBERS WHO WHO WHO AGREED WHEN I BOUGHT THIS MOTION FORWARD LAST TIME.

HOO HOO HOO HOO HOO HOO HOO WILL STILL BE ON THE BOARD. EVEN AFTER WE GET THE TWO NEW BOARD MEMBERS AND SO I THINK IT WOULD JUST BEHOOVE US TO MOVE FORWARD AND GO AHEAD AND GET THIS DONE AND GET OUT THE WAY. ASK WHY. WHAT IS MOTIVE FOR?

>> I CANNOT SUPPORT THIS MOTION UNLESS THERE'S SOMETHING IN THERE THAT WE'RE GOING TO HAVE DATTA PRIOR TO THIS MEETING AND TO HAVE THAT DATA PRIOR TO THE MEETING.

WE HAVE TO HAVE THE EXECUTIVE ASSISTANCE EVALUATION ALREADY PUT OUT AND WE HAVE TO HAVE THAT. THE FEEDBACK FROM THE INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OTHERWISE I THINK WE'RE GOING TO BE SPINNING OUR WHEELS AND WASTING TIME.

>> MR. SMITH I THINK THAT DEE DEE DEE DEE DEE I WISH IN TWO CAN BE PUT IN A BOARD DOCS AND EVERYONE CAN READ IT FROM THE LAST OF OUR WISHING TO THAT WE USED IN ONE DAY THERE WILL BE THE SAME AND IHAT WE WILL USE FOR THIS TIME IF I AM CORRECT FOREVER REMEMBER AS US AS OFFICERS MEETING AND CHANGING THE EVALUATION TOOL SO THE EVALUATION TOOL WILL BE OFF THE ST. SO I'LL HAVE A PROBLEM WITH. I THINK WE CAN HAVE THE EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO SEND OUT THE EVALUATION TO BOARD ACTUALLY THAT WILL GIVE THE

[01:00:03]

DAY. >> THE EVALUATION TOOL WAS CHANGED AND AS THE LAST BOARD YOU ALL CHANGED IT AND THAT'S WHAT I WAS EVALUATED ON WAS BASED OFF WITH THE INPUT IN THE INFORMATION THAT YOU REQUESTED. SO BEING SEVEN BOARD MET OR THE NEW BOARD MEMBERS, YOU ALL CHANGED THE EVALUATION TOOL AND THEN EVALUATED ME BASED OFF OF THE CHANGES THAT YOU MADE MR

OBEID. >> HI MR. RABBI. >> YOU STUCK OR SHE'S PAUSED.

>> KATHY WE CAN'T HEAR YOU. YOU SEEM TO BE FROZEN. LET'S SEE.

YOU LOST IN YOU CAN YOU TEXT HER AND ASK YOU JUST IF YOU JUST GOT BACK AND JUST GET BACK

ON? >> YES. YEAH.

SO I'M JUST SAYING THAT WE DID MAKE CHANGES TO IT IN WHAT CHRISTIAN BAREA STATING IS TRUE BUT THAT MR. SMITH WOULD IS TO INVEST INVESTING FURTHER CHANGES.

SO. SO MR. SMITH SAID WE CAN PUT IT IN MORE DOCS AND HAVE.

SO I WOULD. THERE HAS TO BE SOME CAVEAT. AGAIN, I WON'T SUPPORT THIS UNLESS WE DO THE WORK AHEAD OF TIME. SO JUST PUTTING IN A MORE DOCS DOESN'T MEAN THAT WE'RE ASKING FOR ANY FEEDBACK ON IT. SO SOMEHOW THAT GETS NEEDS TO GET WORKED INTO INTO OTHERWISE WE'RE JUST NOT. I JUST SEE IT AS AS NOT BEING VERY EFFICIENT. SO IS THERE A WAY TO FIT THAT IN THERE? MY COMMENT BE SINCE I HAVEN'T SPOKEN FOR A LITTLE BIT WOULD BE THE FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS IS TO GET THE CURRENT EVALUATION COMPLETED AND THAT IS WITH USING THE CURRENT DOT THE CURRENT INSTRUMENT TOOL AND THAT REALLY SHOULD BE COMPLETED IN THE NEXT TWO WEEKS PROBABLY

COMPLETED IN THE NEXT WEEK BY THE BOARD. >> THERE'S NOTHING THAT REALLY HAS TO GO ON THE AGENDA FOR IT BECAUSE THE BOARD MEMBERS HAVE YOU AS MR. SMITH, YOUR RESPONSIBILITY AS SECRETARY PER BOARD POLICY. THREE POINT ONE ROMAN NUMERAL 4 SECTION D IS TO SUPERVISE AND ENSURE THE ANNUAL EVALUATION THAT THE EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO THE BOARD. SO IT'S YOUR RESPONSIBILITY TO GET THE CURRENT EVALUATION TOOL OUT TO THE BOARD MEMBERS. GIVE THEM A FEW DAYS OR WHATEVER WITH THE YOU KNOW WITH EMAIL THAT SAYS WHEN THEY NEED TO RETURN IT BY AND TO WHOM THEY HAVE TO RETURN IT BY.

AND THEN THE THREE OFFICERS NEED TO COMPILE AND MEET WITH ROBIN CUSHION.

THAT IS WHAT WE DID LAST YEAR BACK IN OCTOBER AS I RECALL. I THINK IT WAS A LITTLE BIT EARLIER THAN LATE NOVEMBER. THE SECOND ORDER OF BUSINESS IS YOUR REQUEST TO CHANGE THE DOCUMENT GOING FORWARD. SO I WILL NOT SUPPORT THAT. I THINK WE WERE OUT OF ORDER WITH THE LOGIC HERE. MR. SPEAKER, ORDER. HOLD ON.

>> FIRST AND FOREMOST, MADAM TO YOUR ROOM. HE DID TELLING YOU BASICALLY TOLD YOU FORCE YOU FORCE YOUR WRONG. BECAUSE BECAUSE OF THE FACT THAT MRS. ROBAN TOOK THE LEAD OH AND SHE THERE WASN'T ONE WHO DID THE SECRETARY EVALUATION LAST YEAR SO THAT THAT THAT'S THAT THAT WAS THAT WAS INCORRECT AND YOU SAID THAT THAT THAT YOU TOLD HER OR WHATEVER LAST YEAR TO DO THAT. SO SO THAT'S NOT TRUE.

SO THAT SHOW SO I'M JUST GETTING BACK AND ARRANGE FOR ME TO DO IT THIS YEAR.

SO THIS DOESN'T LET'S NOT LET'S NOT GET A MEETING LIKE THIS IS MY LIKE I'M DOING IT BECAUSE I DIDN'T DO IT LAST YEAR LAST YEAR. MRS. MRS. MRS ROBAN DID IT. SO I'M JUST GIVING YOU BACK THE TO DO IT THIS YEAR. THANKS FOR GIVING THIS THANKS FOR GIVING ME THE AUTHORITY TO

DO THIS YEAR. >> I WOULD LIKE TO CORRECT. I'M NOT FINISHED.

I'M NOT FINISHED YET. THAT'S ALL ON THE FROM THE FIRST PART AND THEN IN THIS IN THE SECOND PART IS BASICALLY I GUESS MRS. RAMSEY'S ROBOT IS ASKING ME BASICALLY WILL I HAVE THE WHAT? WELL, I HAVEN'T SENT OUT AN YOU ASKING ME TO HAVE IT BACK BY THE 8TH BY THE BODY FIRST BOARD ME. IS THAT WHAT YOU'RE ASKING ME IF I SEND IT TO THE BOOK TO THE BOARD AT THE BEGINNING OF NEXT? OH REALLY? I GUESS YOU GIVE ME A COUPLE DAYS TO GO AND GET THAT DONE. IS THAT WHAT YOU'RE ASKING ME,

[01:05:02]

BECAUSE OTHERWISE THERE'S NO SENSE HAVING IT ON THE AGENDA. SO EVEN EVEN IF WE EVEN KNOW EVEN IF WE SEND THAT OUT, THAT WILL NOT BE ENOUGH TIME. ENOUGH TIME.

NO, I'M NOT. THAT WOULD NOT BE ENOUGH TIME TO GET PEOPLE TO GET THERE BY

WISHING DONE BECAUSE WE ALSO HAVE OTHER SEVERAL MEDIA. >> WE ALSO HAVE OTHER MEETINGS THAT WERE SCHEDULED PRIOR TO PRIOR TO THIS. SO I DON'T KNOW THAT WOULD BE FAIR TO JUST GO AHEAD AND PUSH AND I'LL PUSH THAT ON TO OTHER BOARD MEMBERS.

FORTUNATELY, YEAH. SO I SO IT'S ALMOST LIKE ASKING ME DO SOMETHING THAT THAT YOU DO TRYING TO DO PUSH TO PUT ME IN A JAM COMING OUT OF THE GATE TO GET THIS DONE.

I MEAN I MEAN I WANT TO BE REALISTIC ABOUT THIS. >> SO THAT'S WHY I WOULD ASK YOU HOW WOULD YOU PERCEIVE IT TO BE THAT I'M NEXT IN THE QUEUE?

>> SO I WOULD LIKE PROBABLY YOUR OR ARE YOUR. I WANT TO STATE PUBLICLY WHAT YOU'VE JUST STATED. MR. SMITH IS IS A LOT OF MISINFORMATION.

I WILL STATE FACTUALLY ONE. THERE WERE TWO BOARD MEMBERS WHO DID NOT PARTICIPATE IN THE INDIVIDUAL EVALUATIONS OF MISS CUSHING VERY MINOR OR OF WHEN I AM WORRIED.

WHAT DOES WHAT DOES THAT HAVE TO DO WITH WHAT WILL WORK FOR THE MACHINE ABOUT WHAT WE WERE DISCUSSING INFORMATION THAT YOU KEEP SPREADING THAT'S NOT ACCURATE.

>> YOU DIDN'T PARTICIPATE IN HER EVALUATION AS AN INDIVIDUAL THE LAST YEAR AND NEITHER DID

ANOTHER BOARD MEMBER. >> SO SO WHAT'S YOUR STORY? SO WHAT WAS IT DO YOU DO WHAT YOU DID WAS APPROPRIATE AS CHAIR. SO UNPROFESSIONAL TO BRING THAT UP IF YOU BRING OUT ONE THEN THANKS TO THE PERSON OR TYPOS. NOW YOU CAN GO AND FINISH HAVING THE FLOOR DISCUSSION GARY. IT'S NOT FAIR THAT I CANNOT SPEAK. NOW YOU CAN GO ON WITH THE PERSONAL TAX.

I'M NOT DOING PERSONAL TAX. >> I NEEDED CORRECTED INFORMATION.

>> YOU PERSONALLY DID NOT PARTICIPATE LAST YEAR AS AN INDIVIDUAL WITH THE EVALUATION INSTRUMENT ON MISS CUSHING VERY THEREFORE IT AND MISS ROE BUYING DID PARTICIPATE.

I PARTICIPATE HATED AND MISS ROE HAD DONE HER PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND THEREFORE AS THE CHAIR I CAN ASK AND MISS TO HAVE MISS ROE BEIN AS VISE CHAIR DO ADDITIONAL DUTIES.

AND SINCE YOU HAVE EVEN PARTICIPATED I DIDN'T THINK IT WAS APPROPRIATE THAT YOU DO THE EVALUATION. I THOUGHT IT WAS APPROPRIATE. ALL THREE OF US DID IT.

AND YOU, SIR, WERE INVOLVED WITH THE TALLY. SO I'M I JUST WANT THE PUBLIC

TO KNOW WHAT ACTUALLY TRANSPIRED. >> SO GO BACK TO THE MOTION ON THE TABLE HERE. MISS CUSHING, COULD YOU PLEASE PUT THE MOTION UP AND WE'RE GOING TO VOTE NOW? WE'VE HAD PLENTY OF DISCUSSION THEN WE GO GET IT.

>> ALL RIGHT. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR. THE MOTION IS TO DISCUSS THE EVALUATION TOOL FOR 20, 20, 20, 21 FOR THE EXECUTIVE SESSION. IT SHOULD BE EXACTLY.

EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT SORRY DECEMBER 8TH AGENDA OK. >> ALL THOSE IN FAVOR PLEASE SAY I. MR. SMITH. ALL THOSE OPPOSED NAY NAY THE

MOTION FAILS. ONE TWO. >> JOB.

COULD YA HEAR ME? YEAH. YOU SAID YES CORRAL.

>> OH GOD I KNOW I TURNED HIS CUSTOMARY MUTE ME IT'S UNTIL I EITHER I WAS ON MUTE IT OR NOT YOU DIDN'T. SHE DID. I DIDN'T MEAN TO MUTE YOU, SIR.

YOU JUST KEPT TALKING AND FINALLY DECIDED YOU WOULDN'T TALK ANYMORE AND YOU FINALLY LET SOMEBODY ELSE HAVE THE FLOOR. I EAT THE CHAIR SO THE MOTION

FAILS ONE TOO. >> SO MR. SMITH, YOU STILL HAVE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF DOING THE CURRENT EVALUATION IN THE NEXT TWO WEEKS AND THAT'S YOUR RESPONSIBILITY.

SO NOW THE NEXT THING ON THE AGENDA IS TO ORDER MR. SMITH IN ONE SENATE STATE.

>> WHAT IS WRONG WITH THE PROCESS? THAT IS WHAT YOU STATE BY POINT OF ORDER. WHAT IS THE PROCESS YOU'RE OBJECTING TO?

YOU JUST STATED SOMETHING AS FALSE. >> IT'S NOT YOUR JOB TO TELL ME HOW TO DO MY JOB. IT'S NOT I FRANKLY SO I'M SO. SO IS NOT YOUR JOB TO TELL ME WHEN THIS EVALUATION IS TO TAKE PLACE? IT IS UP TO ME TO DECIDE WHEN THE BATTLE WILL TAKE PLACE AND TO BRING IT RIGHT TO BRING IT TO THE FULL BOARD.

JUST FOR CLARIFICATION BECAUSE SOMETIMES I SOMETIMES YOU SOMETIMES GET CAUGHT UP WITH

WITH POWER. >> THANK YOU. RESPECTFULLY DISAGREE WITH YOUR ANALYSIS. IT'S IN THE POLICY MANUAL, SIR. TAKE A LOOK AT IT.

[01:10:03]

I QUOTED IT FOR YOU. SECTION 1 ROMAN NUMERAL 4 D. >> THAT'S YOUR RESPONSIBILITY, NOT MINE. ALL RIGHT. WE'RE MOVING ON TO THE SO WE WERE UNDER BOARD BUSINESS BUSINESS ACTION AND WE'RE MOVING ON TO THE COMMITTEE

REPORTS SO WE HAVE A SET ACADEMIC COMMITTEE. >> THE AD BLUFFTON GROWTH COMMITTEE, THE AD HOC SELF-EVALUATION COMMITTEE. THE FINANCE COMMITTEE AND THE LEGISLATIVE UPDATE FROM LYNN STOKES MARIA SHE WAS UNABLE REMEMBER TO ATTEND TO THE WORK SESSION BECAUSE SHE WAS ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED FOR FRIDAY MORNING.

BUT OUR BOARD MEETING RAN INTO FRIDAY MORNING. MISS CUSHING BURIED UNDER THE

COMMITTEE'S REPORTS. >> THERE IS GOING TO BE SOME ITEMS UNDER BLUFFTON AND SOUTH VALUATION. I THINK THERE'S ANOTHER MOTION UNDER FINANCE SO THERE BE SOME ADDITIONAL ITEMS ADDED IN ACADEMICS UNDER EACH OF THE COMMITTEE.

SO ONCE I GO BACK THROUGH AND FIND OUT WHAT EMOTIONS WHERE THOSE WILL BE ADDED UNDER THE

COMMITTEE REPORTS. >> OK. THANK YOU.

I MIGHT SUGGEST SINCE SINCE MISS STOKES MURRAY IS AN OUTSIDE PRESENTER SHE'S OUR

LOBBYIST. >> I WOULD LIKE WHAT IT SEEMS LIKE IT WOULD BE NICE TO PUT HER FIRST UNDER THE COMMITTEE REPORTS. DO I EITHER?

>> KATHY OR WILLIAM OBJECTED TO THAT I THINK AGAIN. >> MR. SMITH, OF COURSE IT WAS A WHILE. WHY WOULD SHE COME TO THE MEETING IF SHE DIDN'T COME TO THE WORK SESSION? I JUST EXPLAINED, SIR. SHE WAS SCHEDULED TO COME TO THE WORK SESSION ON FRIDAY MORNING. AS YOU RECALL, NOVEMBER 10TH MEETING DID NOT THE ADDITIONAL AGENDA TOPICS DID NOT GO TO THE 11TH WEDNESDAY BECAUSE THAT WAS VETERANS DAY. THEY WENT TO FRIDAY MORNING. SO THEREFORE THE WORK SESSION COULD NOT COMMENCE AND THAT'S WHY SHE COULDN'T COME BECAUSE THE TIME SHE WAS ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED WAS NO LONGER THE WORK SESSION. IT WAS THE COMPLETION OF THE

TWO DAY MEETING. >> OK, SO ROBIN WILL MOVE THE LEGISLATIVE UPDATE TO THE FIRST

COMMITTEE REPORT AND THEN JUST GO ALPHABETICALLY. >> IT LOOKS LIKE WHAT YOU GOT

IT THERE. >> ALL RIGHT. >> NOW WE'RE DOWN TO THE SUPERINTENDENTS REPORT. DR. RODRIGUEZ, DO YOU WANT TO GO THROUGH THIS DRAW? SO WE HAVE UNDER FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY AMONGST THE TRANSPARENCY REPORT HUNDRED REPORT AND THE BOARD MONTHLY BUDGET. THEN UNDER OTHER MATTERS I HAVE

AN UPDATE 45 DAY COUNT AND THE COVID 19. >> CAN YOU ALSO WE CAN SEE THE WHOLE SUPERINTENDENTS REPORT. NO, THE OTHER WAY. SORRY.

THANK YOU. I SO ONE OTHER ITEM I WAS THINKING IS WHAT ABOUT THE THE

TEACHER FOR I MEAN ARE THEY. >> DR. RODRIGUEZ READY TO GIVE A PRESENTATION AT THIS TIME?

CHECK WITH. I THINK ALLISON NO BUT I WILL. >> I WILL FOLLOW UP WITH HER.

AND WHERE WHERE WOULD WE HAVE THAT UNDER THE GO TO? SURE THAT THE TEAMS THE MOST.

>> SO LET'S PUT A PLACEHOLDER THERE AND LET'S SEE IF THEY ARE READY TO COME FORWARD.

LOOK, I KNOW INDIFFERENT GIVEN THAT THE LEARNING SITUATION OR THE LEARNING OPTIONS.

>> KATHY AND WILLIAM, ANY COMMENTS REGARDING MR. SMITH YOU'RE MUTED, WILLIAM.

WE'VE GOT RECORD IN REGARDS TO WHAT EXACTLY. >> SO UNDER WE'RE GONNA HAVE A ONE FOR THE THE DIFFERENT COUNTY SCHOOL TEACHERS ORGANIZATIONS NO LONGER CALLED THE TEACHER FORM THE PAC. I JUST THERE THEY'RE THEY NORMALLY COME QUARTERLY AND THEY HAVE NOT COME QUARTERLY BECAUSE OF THE WHOLE COVERED ISSUE AND THEY WEREN'T READY TO COME BEFORE I WAS. WOULD LIKE TO INVITE THEM TO THIS MEETING IF THEY ARE READY TO HAVE A PRESENTATION, IF THEY HAVE SOMETHING THEY WOULD LIKE TO COVER .

THE PROBLEM WITH IT. >> OKAY. KATHY, I CONCUR.

OKAY. SO ROBIN, YOU'LL ADD THAT UNDER UNDER UNDER NUMBER TWO THERE.

YES. OKAY. ALL RIGHT.

THEN I THINK THE REST OF THE I DON'T THINK THERE'S ANY OTHER COMMENTS REGARDING THE REST OF THE AGENDA BECAUSE IT'S THE USUAL STUFF ON THEIR NOW COULD YOU GO BACK TO THE RESOURCE SHACK DUE TO QUESTION ABOUT THE COMMITTEE REPORT AND WE HAVE NOT DONE THIS IN THE PAST THAT

[01:15:04]

I'M AWARE OF . >> BUT IT MIGHT BE A DECENT PRACTICE TO START THE COMMITTEES WILL LIKELY BE REFORMULATED, RECONSTITUTED. WHERE HAVE YOU COME JANUARY? IS IT A GOOD OPPORTUNITY FOR EACH OF THE COMMITTEES TO RECAP AND CLOSE OUT STATE ANYTHING OUTSTANDING THEY MIGHT HAVE? IS THAT SOMETHING THAT YOU WOULD LIKE US TO INCLUDE IN OUR

COMMITTEE REPORT BECAUSE WE DON'T KNOW. >> I MEAN OUR POLICY IS THAT THE COMMITTEES WOULD BE I GUESS FORMED AGAIN IN JANUARY. IS THAT CORRECT? I'M GOING OFF MEMORY HERE SO BEAR WITH ME. IT MIGHT BE A GOOD OPPORTUNITY TO INCLUDE THAT IN EACH OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT. JUST IT COULD HAPPEN CLOSING OUT THAT WOULD BE FINE. I MEAN I YOU KNOW, I DON'T I DON'T HAVE A STRONG PREFERENCE

ONE OR THE OTHER. >> OK. I DIDN'T KNOW IF THAT WAS SOMETHING YOU MIGHT WANT AND THAT EACH OF US BE REQUIRED TO DO THAT EACH COMMITTEE.

BUT THAT'S FINE. OKAY. MR. SMITH?

>> YES. I DO AGREE THAT I THAT WITH THIS CLOSING FOR THE YEAR I THINK EACH COMMITTEE SHOULD GIVE IT THOSE IN THEIR REPORT SO THEY COULD GO ON RECORD OF WHOEVER PICKS IT PICKS UP THE COMMITTEE CAN KNOW EXACTLY WHERE EVERY COMMITTEE THAT IS LIVING OFF THAT. I THINK THAT I BELIEVE THAT THAT IS SOMETHING THAT SHOULD BE DONE IF WE HADN'T DONE THAT AND I THINK THAT THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WE SHOULD DO.

IT BEING THAT WE WILL HAVE COMMITTEES AT THE BEGINNING OF THE FIRST OF NEXT IT WILL BE UP TO THE CHAIR TO THE SOUTH WITH THE NEW COMMITTEES, THE NEW CHAIR OR THE CHAIR MAYBE AND AS WELL I ALSO I WAS WONDERING I DID TO GO BACK TO I WENT IN MRS. ADAMS WALTON SAID THAT SHE HAD FOUND A SHE HAS SHE HAS FOUND A A TOOL THAT SHE WANTS TO BRING FORTH FOR THE BOARD TO PRESENT THAT FOR THE GRIEVANCES. AND I WAS I WAS WONDERING WELL WHERE SHOULD I GO AND BRING THAT FORTH? IS THAT READY AND THAT A PLACE HOLD AS WELL? NO, THAT'S NOT COMING FORWARD AT THE BOARD MEETING AND IT MIGHT BE SOMETHING THAT MAYBE SHE NEEDS TO BRING BACK THROUGH OPERATIONS COMMITTEE FIRST, OK?

>> SO AT THIS POINT I GUESS BECAUSE WE CAN GET IT GOING WE CAN JUST BRING IT TO THE FULL BOARD BECAUSE WE CAN HAVE LAST MONTH OPERATION COMMITTEE SO MAYBE WANT TO GO AND BRING IT TO THE FULL BOARD SO WE CAN GO AND GET THAT IN PLACE. BEFORE NEXT YEAR.

MISS CUSHING DAY JUST A REMINDER THAT THERE ARE TWO COMMITTEES THAT ARE MEETING AFTER THE BOARD AFTER THE DECEMBER 8TH MEETING ACADEMICS AND OPERATIONS AND THE AD HOC BLUFFTON GROUP ARE SCHEDULED TO MEET AFTER 8:00 SO THEY MIGHT NOT BE ABLE TO PROVIDE A END OF THE YEAR CLOSE OUT BECAUSE THEY WILL NOT HAVE ENDED YET. AND HOW ABOUT ALSO ISN'T A SELF EVALUATION COMMITTEE ALSO MEETING AFTER THAT IS JUST A FOLLOW UP OF WHAT WHAT WHATEVER

ACTIONS TAKEN ON THE 8TH? >> MS. ROBAN.

I THINK THAT YOU KNOW PEOPLE THAT ARE DONE, COMMUNITIES THAT ARE DONE DOING RECAP IS A FINE IDEA. YOU KNOW EACH COMMITTEE HAS COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES AND EACH COMMITTEE ALSO HAS I CAN FUTURE TOPICS LISTED OR THINGS THAT THEY'RE GOING TO TALK ABOUT NEXT. SO I THINK THAT YOU KNOW THE INFORMATION IS THERE KNOW RECAPPING IS IS NOT A BAD IDEA. BUT IT'S NOT LIKE WE WON'T HAVE ANY INFORMATION.

BUT I THINK THOSE THAT ARE DONE AT THAT MEETING, YOU KNOW, DOING A RECAP, SOME FINE IDEA I CONCUR. I MEAN EVERY CAPS FIND THAT IT NEEDS TO BE SUCCINCT BECAUSE EXACTLY IF PEOPLE WANT LOTS OF DETAIL THEY'LL HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO AS YOU MENTIONED, LISTEN TO EITHER WATCH VIDEOS OR READ THE MINUTES OR AND THEY CAN LOOK AT THE MOTIONS THAT PASSED AND EACH COMMITTEE SO IT WOULD IT WOULD NEED TO BE SOMETHING SUCCINCT ABOUT WHAT WAS OUTSTANDING OR WHAT WAS FELT TO BE NECESSARY TO AN IMPORTANT TOPIC TO COVER GOING FORWARD. ALL RIGHT. CAN YOU NOW, ROBIN, GO TO THE

[01:20:04]

[Discussion of any other Board Meeting Agendas]

POLICY MANUAL. >> SO WE NEED TO BE SURE THAT AGENDA GETS OUT.

>> I WOULD LIKE TO PROPOSE THAT WE ADD SOMETHING TO THAT MEETING AND IT DOESN'T MATTER WHETHER IT'S AT THE BEGINNING OR AT THE END. I WOULD LIKE TO BRING FORWARD A NOMINATION FOR THE SOUTH CAROLINA SCHOOL BOARDS ASSOCIATION CHAMPION FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION AWARD AND WE ALL RECEIVE THE SOUTH CAROLINA SCHOOL BOARD ASSOCIATION E FOCUSED EMAIL TODAY. AND IN THIS IS JUST ADDRESSED IN THERE AND THERE'S A DEADLINE OF DECEMBER 4TH WHICH IS FRIDAY FOR THIS NOMINATION FOR THIS AWARD.

AND I WOULD LIKE TO HAVE IT ADDED TO THE AGENDA BECAUSE I PERSONALLY WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO NOMINATE REALTOR CATHERINE DONALDSON FOR THIS AWARD FOR HER INITIATIVE REGARDING THE THE THE MONEY SHE RAISED FOR THE TABLETS FOR THE YOUNGER STUDENTS IN OUR DISTRICT DURING THE CORONA VIRUS PANDEMIC. BUT WE THE ONLY MEETING WE HAVE WHERE IT WOULD FIT IN THIS TIMELY MANNER WOULD BE ON THE WEDNESDAY MEETING AND I DON'T THINK IT WOULD BE SOMETHING THAT WOULD GENERATE A LOT OF DISCUSSION.

WE JUST NEED BOARD APPROVAL TO HAVE IT GO TO THE SOUTH CAROLINA SCHOOL BOARD ASSOCIATION AND AN INDIVIDUAL BOARD MEMBER KNOW CAN MAKE THE NOMINATION BUT THE BOARD WOULD HAVE TO APPROVE IT. SO I'D LIKE I RESPECTFULLY ASK TO HAVE THAT EITHER AT THE BEGINNING OR THE END OF THE MEETING ON ON WEDNESDAY WITH ROBIN.

I THINK IT'S A GREAT IDEA TO ADD IT TO THE TIME CRUNCH AND WE'LL GET A MEETING SCHEDULED.

SMITH MUTED WILLIAM WITH JUST ONE. DO WE KNOW OF ANYONE ELSE THAT WE POSSIBLY MAY WANT TO NOMINATE FOR THAT AWARD AS WELL? AND SO AS I'VE JUST KIND OF DIDN'T WANT US TO JUMP TO THAT ON THAT CERTAIN I'M NOT

EXACTLY SURE I'M NO I'M I'M I'M A I JUST CAME FROM THIS. >> RIGHT? I'M NOT SURE. STAY OKAY. SO I MOVE THAT WE ADD TO THE AGENDA ON THE SET. WELL ACTUALLY KATHY I'LL LET YOU MAKE THE MOVE.

OKAY. I DON'T HAVE TO PASS A GALLO. YEAH I MOVE THAT WE ADD TO THE

AGENDA ON DECEMBER 2ND THE ABILITY TO NOMINATE. >> WHAT'S THE NAME OF THE AWARD AGAIN? IT'S THE SC SBA CHAMPIONS FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION AWARD.

WELL SEE US BE B.A. THE ABILITY TO NOMINATE A TO NOMINATE SOMEONE OR JUST TO NOMINATE A

PERSON. >> AND I DON'T KNOW I THINK THIS OPENS IT UP TO MR. SMITH IF EITHER IF SOMEBODY ELSE I DON'T KNOW TO NOMINATE A PERSON FOR THAT AS THE SBA AND THEN WHAT'S THE NAME OF IT AGAIN? YOU SORRY I HAVEN'T READ THE EMAIL.

IT'S CALLED THE SC SBA CHAMPIONS FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION AWARD.

AND I WOULD LIKE SPECIFICALLY TO HAVE THE MOTION. I'LL I'LL DRAFT THE MOTION BUT I'D LIKE IT ON THE ON THE AGENDA WITH HER NAME. WITH HER NAME.

OK. >> SO THAT'S ME AND MAYBE YOU SHOULD MAKE THE MOTION BECAUSE THAT'S NOT THE MOTION THAT MRS. ROBOT IS MAKING WAS BROUGHT BY THE SAME ANYONE BUT JUST YOU PACIFIC IS SAYING SOMEONE SO THAT'S A KIND OF A THAT THAT DOESN'T GIVE YOU A YEAR YOU'RE

SAYING TWO DIFFERENT THINGS. >> MS. >> RIBAUT I YOU ARE NO YOU'RE

[01:25:02]

NOT. >> WELL I WAS THINKING YOU KNOW WHEN WILLIAM SAID WELL IS THERE ANYBODY ELSE WE SHOULD THINK ABOUT? I THOUGHT MAYBE.

I CAN'T THINK OF ANYONE. I THINK THAT SHE'S WHAT SHE DID WAS PRETTY PHENOMENAL FOR OUR STUDENTS. ELYSE, CAN I WORK WITH THIS WORDING RIGHT CLICK MOTION TO ADD TO THE DECEMBER 2ND 2020 SPECIAL CALLED MEETING THE AGENDA ITEM TO ADD TO NOMINATION FOR THE S C SBA CHAMPIONS FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION AWARD.

>> OK. I THINK THIS BASICALLY WELL THAT'S BASICALLY WHAT MRS. RIBAUT SAID. I'M PUTTING IT UP THERE SO THAT YOU CAN SEE IT.

AND TINA WOULD LIKE US TO HAVE IN THERE TO NOMINATE CATHERINE DONALDSON FOR THAT AS CSP, CORRECT? YEAH. SO WE COULD SAY ADD THE NOMINATION OR I'M SORRY I MEANT SPECIAL CALLED JUDGES TO TO ADD THE NOMINATION OF NOMINATION.

>> WE CAN SAY CATHERINE DONALDSON FOR THE CHAMPIONS FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION AWARD.

I'M AFRAID IF YOU I MEAN WILLIAM, DO HAVE YOU HAVE SOMEBODY IN MIND I'M AFRAID IF WE GET INTO THAT IT'S ANYBODY I MEAN WE'VE GOT TO HAVE YOU KNOW I MEAN WHEN I MAKE THE MOTION I'VE GOT TO EXPLAIN WHY I VALUE LEARNING OF THIS AWARD AND I CONCUR WITH THAT.

I'M OK WITH PUTTING HER NAME IN THERE. ALL RIGHT.

THAT MAY BE TRUE, BUT WHAT ABOUT OTHER OTHER PEOPLE AROUND THE DISTRICT THAT WE MAY NOT BE AWARE ABOUT AWARE OF THAT MAY HAVE DONE SOMETHING JUST JUST ESPECIALLY THEN YOU KNOW, THEN WE WOULD NEED TO TALK THAT WE WANT TO TALK THAT OUT. I MEAN BECAUSE I'M NOT I KNOW OF FAMILY WHO WHO WHO WHO SUPPLIED ME FOOD FOR THE WHOLE THE WHOLE THE WHOLE YEAR.

YOU KNOW SO I MEAN THAT THAT'S THAT'S SO. SO DOES THAT IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD HAVE TO BE DISCUSSED. I MEAN I'M NOT SURE ABOUT NO ONE PAID ONE ONE PAID MORE THAN THE OTHER OR HOW WE SHOULD MAKE THAT DECISION. BUT THEY ARE THEY ARE DIFFERENT THINGS TODAY. IT IS A DISCUSSION IS JUST TAKE PLACE BEFORE WE PUT THE NAME OUT THERE THAT THAT THAT THAT THAT'S THAT'S MY I DON'T WANT GEMMA BEHIND SOMETHING AND THEN WHEN WE GET THERE I SAID WELL I'M NOT SURE ABOUT THAT AND NOT NOW.

>> WELL YOU MAY 14 YOU GO SO THAT THIS IF YOU WERE THERE WHEN WE MADE THE MOTION SECONDED OR YOU VOTED IN FAVOR OF WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE NOW? SO I DON'T WANT PUT MYSELF OUT THERE SO THAT IS WHY I WAS CONVINCED THAT SHE WOULD MAKE THE MOTION FOR ANYONE TO GIVE SOMEONE THAT POSITION THEN. HOWEVER PROBLEM WITH THAT. BUT TO PUT SOMEONE'S NAME ONE THAT CAN'T SUPPORT THAT AT THIS TIME BECAUSE I DON'T HAVE ENOUGH FACTS ANY PERSON I'M NOT AWARE OF WHAT SHE WAS CASE BEING AWARE THAT CAN I MAKE A SUGGESTION ASSESS IS THIS A FRIDAY DEADLINE THAT IF YOU LEAVE IT WITHOUT THE NAME ON IT?

>> ANYONE WHO HAS SOMEONE'S NAME THAT THEY WANT TO BRING THAT PROVIDE THEM THE DOCUMENT TO FILL OUT THE NOMINATION FORM AND THEN THOSE NAMES CAN BE PRESENTED ON WEDNESDAY IN THE MOTION. SO THEY HAVE TO COME WITH THE DOCUMENT AND THE MOTION SO THAT WAY PEOPLE WILL KNOW WHO DID WHAT. WHAT YOU'RE VOTING ON.

SO IF YOU HAVE A NAME IF SOMEONE HAS A NAME THAT THEY WANT TO NOMINATE, THEY WOULD NEED TO BRING THE NAME THE MOTION THEY WOULD MAKE THE MOTION AND THEY WOULD HAVE THE DOCUMENT THE NOMINATION FORM. SO THAT WAY WHEN THE BOARD VOTES ON IT'S READY TO BE

SUBMITTED BY FRIDAY. >> SO JUST LIKE YOU HAVE MISSED KATHERINE, IF MR. SMITH HAS A NAME HE WOULD NEED TO PROVIDE THE NAME ON THE NOMINATION FORM AND THAT WOULD BE ANOTHER

MOTION THAT THEY WOULD VOTE ON AND SO FORTH. >> SO I THINK YOUR IDEA IS VERY GOOD AND IT WILL ALSO CUT DOWN ON TIME IF THE IS COMPLETED AHEAD OF TIME AND IT GIVES THE REQUIRED INFORMATION THAT WOULD BE NECESSARY TO TO NOMINATE SOMEBODY.

>> SO BUT THAT'S NOT THIS NOT THIS THIS MOTION SO WOULD HAVE TO BE AMENDED TO ADD THE NAME.

>> SO WE'RE ADDING THE ABILITY TO ADD THE NOMINATION ON THE AGENDA.

SO SO YOU'LL BE ABLE TO NOMINATE WHOMEVER BUT KATHY. GO AHEAD.

I THINK THAT. YEAH, I THINK THAT THE MOTION DOES GIVE THE WAY IT'S WRITTEN HERE. THERE'S ALLOW US TO IT JUST SAYS ON THE AGENDA THERE'S GOING TO BE SOMEBODY. THERE'S THE ABILITY TO NOMINATE WHOEVER.

[01:30:07]

I THINK THIS OPENS SET UP FOR THAT MOTION TO ADD TO THE DECEMBER 2ND SPECIAL CALLED MEETING THE AGENDA ITEM TO ADD THE NOMINATE TO ADD A NOMINATION INSTEAD THE TO ADD A NOMINATION AND THEN I WOULD ALSO SAY ON THE AGENDA WE PLACE THIS AT THE END OF OUR AGENDA.

WE ALLOW 10 MINUTES OR OTHERWISE. I WOULD PUT IT AT THE END OF OUR AGENDA RATHER THAN AT THE BEGINNING. ALL RIGHT.

>> AND SO THE UNDERSTANDING WOULD BE ROBIN, WOULD YOU BE ABLE TO BEFORE WE VOTE ON THIS? DO YOU THINK YOU ARE ABLE TO GET TO THE BOARD MEMBERS FIRST OF ALL, JUST YOU CAN FORWARD WHAT WE GOT FROM THE IT'S CALLED. I THINK IT'S THE EAGLE ON THE SOUTH CAROLINA SCHOOL BOARD ASSOCIATION TODAY. YOU CAN LITERALLY CUT AND PASTE AND I'LL TELL YOU ABOUT THIS AWARD AND THEN ATTACH WHATEVER NOMINATION FORM IS NECESSARY.

SO IF OTHER BOARD MEMBERS WANT TO BRING OTHER NAMES FORWARD AND YOU CAN SAY THAT I'LL BRING KATHERINE DONALDSON'S FORWARD SO NOT EVERYBODY HAS TO DO THE SAME WORK OVER AND OVER AGAIN AND THAT THEY CAN DO THAT AND THEN WE CAN VOTE EACH EACH PERSON DOWN FORM UP OR DOWN HAS

A. >> AND WHEN WOULD YOU BE ABLE TO DO THAT, DO YOU THINK? LIKE I SAID AT THE I GUESS IN THE IF I CAN SEND OUT THE NOMINATIONS DOES THIS AFTERNOON PERFECT KATHY. YES. OH YOUR HANDS.

I'M SORRY I DIDN'T TAKE MY HAND DOWN. OK.

>> ALL RIGHT. WE'RE READY TO VOTE. >> ALL RIGHT.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR. I. OK.

THAT MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY THROUGH THE AND I THINK THAT'S THE WAY THERE YOU, WILLIAM OR KATHY HAVE ANY OTHER BOARD MEETING AGENDA THAT NEEDS TO BE THE DISCUSSED.

>> ROBIN, I HAVE ONE. SO ON THE BOTTOM OF THE AGENDA WE ALWAYS PUT WHERE THE NEXT BOARD MEETING THE NEXT BOARD MEETING IS JANUARY 5TH WHICH IS JUST THE SWEARING IN.

I HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO BECAUSE I HAVE NOT CONFIRMED YET IF WE WOULD BE ABLE TO BE IN THE CHAMBER OR IF IT'S GOING TO HAVE TO JUST TAKE PLACE HERE. MY SECOND QUESTION IS IF WE DO THAT, ARE WE OPENING UP TO THE FULL PUBLIC? ARE WE CONTINUING TO BE HYBRID BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT I ADVERTISED ON THE AGENDA OR SHOULD WE STILL WAIT?

>> I THINK WE SHOULD DO IT. WELL, WE SAID THE WE. >> WE SAID WE WOULD.

OUR MEETINGS WOULD MIRROR THE THE WHAT THE SCHOOLS WERE DOING THAT WAS THE VOTE AND THE MOTION THAT WAS APPROVED OR EXCUSE THE MOTION AND THE VOTE THAT WAS APPROVED BY THE BOARD.

SO THE. COULD YOU PLEASE TELL ME THAT I KNOW THE SCHOOLS REOPEN ON I BELIEVE IT'S JANUARY 4TH. DR. RODRIGUEZ, JANUARY 4TH. AND THAT'S A MONDAY, CORRECT? YES. SO THIS WOULD BE TUESDAY, CORRECT? ROBYN, JANUARY 5TH. CORRECT. SO.

AND SO DR. RODRIGUEZ WILL SINCE THE SCHOOLS WILL BE FIVE DAYS FULL TIME FACE TO FACE IF NO NO

LONGER HYBRID EITHER. >> THE OTHER OPTION IS JUST VIRTUAL WILL THE PUBLIC BE ALLOWED INTO THE SCHOOL STARTING THEN WE'RE STILL IN THE MIDST OF GOING THROUGH THAT

RIGHT NOW. >> ONE. THAT'S AN OPTION.

ANOTHER POSSIBILITY MIGHT BE A COUPLE OF WEEKS LATER. LET US SORT OF GET GOING AND THEN DO THAT. BUT IT IS WE WOULD LIKE TO. OBVIOUSLY WE WOULD LIKE TO IF

[01:35:02]

>> ONE IS WE HAVE THIS THIS THIS MOTION THAT WAS APPROVED BY THE BOARD THAT WE MIRROR WHAT THE SCHOOLS DO. SO THEY'RE GOING TO MEET THEY'RE GOING TO BE HAVE THEIR HAVE DECIDED WHETHER THE PUBLIC'S ALLOWED OR NOT BY JANUARY 4TH AND WE'RE MEETING A DAY AFTER THAT WOULD DETERMINE IF WE DO JUST WHAT THEY'RE DOING THAT WOULD DETERMINE WHAT HAPPENS ON THAT FIFTH MEETING AND WHETHER THE PUBLIC'S ALLOWED OR NOT.

THE OTHER THE OTHER SIDE OF THE COIN THOUGH IS THAT THIS IS A YOU KNOW, THESE PEOPLE ARE YOU KNOW, THERE'S FOUR OF GETTING SWORN IN AND YOU KNOW, SHOULD BE RESTRICTING PEOPLE THAT ARE NOT ALLOWED TO HAVE AT LEAST THEIR IMMEDIATE FAMILY THERE. IS THAT REALLY FAIR FOR THE BOARD TO DO THAT? THE IMMEDIATE FAMILY DOESN'T HAVE TO COME CERTAINLY IF SOMEBODY DOESN'T WANT TO. AND I I ASSUME THAT THEY COULD LIKELY DO IT.

I DON'T KNOW. ROBIN, CAN THEY ALSO DO IT VIRTUALLY OVER ZOOM IF THEY

FEEL THAT THEY DON'T WANT TO BE IN PERSON? >> YOU MEAN THE FAMILY MEMBERS OR THE BOARD MEMBERS GETTING SWORN IN? THE BOARD MEMBERS GETTING SWORN

IN. >> I BELIEVE YOU YOU'LL STILL BE ABLE TO DO IT OVER A ZONE THAT THEY WANT. YOU'LL STAND TAKE YOUR OATH AND STUFF AND YOU CAN DO THAT ON

ZERO. >> SO I SEE IT AS A KIND OF A I DON'T SEE A DOUBLE EDGED SWORD

. >> BUT I SEE IT AS WE SAID WE WOULD FOLLOW WHAT THE SCHOOLS DID. WE ABLE TO DO THAT SINCE IT'S THE DAY AFTER THE SCHOOLS REOPEN FULLY. BUT YET IS THAT REALLY FAIR TO THE TO THE TO THE BOARD MEMBERS THAT ARE GETTING SWORN IN, MR. SMITH ALSO. I BELIEVE THAT THE STUDENTS AND STUDENTS SOON HAVE THE OPTION OF COMING TO SCHOOL OR NOT COMING BACK TO THE SCHOOL.

CORRECT. SO THIS CAN CONTINUE TO LEARN VERSES AND NOT CORRECT OTHER RODRIGUEZ YES, SIR. WE HAVE A VIRTUAL OPTION FOR STUDENTS AND WE HAVE FACE TO

FACE. >> IS THAT SO? SO THAT SAME WOULD APPLY FOR THE BOARD. SO THE BOARD MEMBERS WOULD HAVE THAT SAME OPTION WOULD THEY CAN COME BACK IN THEY COME TO THE BOARD MEETING VIRTUALLY OR THEY COULD GO ALL THEY COULD GO COME FACE TO FACE. I MEAN CLEARLY COMPANIES FACE OR THEY COULD OR THEY COULD STILL USE THEM. SO SO SO THAT'S THAT'S WHY I'M SO SO THEREFORE I'LL DO THAT.

WE RULED OUT RIVER SOMEONE'S GOING TO USE ZOOM OR A RIVER SOMEONE'S GOING TO COME THAT COME TO COME TO THE ACTUAL BOARD COME TO THE THE DISTRICT OFFICE CENTRAL CENTRAL OFFICE.

>> SO THAT'S ALSO WHAT I THINK THAT THAT'S STILL A QUESTION OF BIAS.

>> I THINK WE SHOULD WAIT AS TIME ASAMI CLOSER DOCTOR EVERY. >> I THINK SOONER OR LATER THE BOARD'S GONNA HAVE TO COME IN DECISION ON ON HOW TO MOVE FORWARD.

THAT'S NOT NECESSARILY TIED TO THE SCHOOL DISTRICT AND I'LL EXPLAIN WHY THAT'S BECAUSE WE MAY CONTINUE WITH A VIRTUAL OPTION FOR FOUR FAMILIES IN THE NEXT YEAR NOT BECAUSE OF COVERED BUT BECAUSE THERE ARE SOME FAMILIES THAT MAY WANT THAT OPTION.

RIGHT. THAT THAT THAT THERE MAY BE A NEED THERE.

THERE MAY BE A AN OPPORTUNITY THAT THE DISTRICT CAN CAPITALIZE ON TO BENEFIT STUDENTS. AND SO SO I WOULD AT SOME JUNCTURE BEGIN TO THINK ABOUT HOW THE BOARD WANTS TO HANDLE IT MOVING FORWARD. THAT DOESN'T NECESSARILY TIE ITSELF TO THE DISTRICT BECAUSE THE DISTRICT MAY HAVE THE POSSIBILITY WE MAY HAVE AN OVER TWO OPTION FOR YEARS TO COME. KATHY, IN REGARDS TO THE FIRST MEETING IN JANUARY, I WOULD SUGGEST THAT IF PEOPLE THAT ARE BEING SWORN IN WE'D LIKE THEIR FAMILY MEMBERS TO ATTEND THAT.

I THINK WE CAN DO THAT SAFELY. I THINK THE FAMILY MEMBERS IF YOU LOOK AT HOW MUCH ROOM IS IN THE MEDIA CENTER, THE FAMILY MEMBERS COULD SIT BY CLUSTER. WE HAVE FOUR PEOPLE THAT WOULD BE BRINGING FAMILY MEMBERS AND THEY COULD BE THINKING WHERE HOW WE'RE SITTING NOW.

THEY COULD BE BEHIND US AND COME UP WITH THAT FAMILY MEMBER AND YOU KNOW, IT'S UP TO THEM WHETHER THEY FEEL SAFE TO DO THAT. YOU KNOW, I FEEL AS THE BOARD MEMBERS, THOSE OF US WHO ARE THERE IN PERSON, THE DISTANCE BEHIND US IS PRETTY GREAT.

SO THAT WOULD BE MY I THINK IT SHOULD BE AN OPPORTUNITY AND LET THE INDIVIDUALS DECIDE.

THAT'S ALL. THANK YOU, KATHY. THAT'S ALSO MY PREFERENCE.

I THINK IT SHOULD BE BECAUSE I DO THINK IT COULD BE DONE SAFELY AND I DO THINK THAT PEOPLE SHOULD HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY IF THEY WANT THEIR FAMILY MEMBERS TO COMMENT.

[01:40:02]

MY HAND'S STILL UP. YEAH, I'M SORRY. NO, THAT SHOULDN'T BE.

SO MY QUESTION IS IS THIS BEING OPEN TO EVERYONE OR JUST THE FAMILY MEMBERS ARE WE ARE WE CONSIDERING THIS A PUBLIC BOARD MEETING OR ARE WE KEEPING THE PUBLIC ON ZOOM AND WE'RE JUST

LETTING THE FAMILY MEMBERS COME FOR THE JANUARY 5TH MEETING? >> MR..

I THINK THAT THROUGH THIS JANUARY 5TH MEETING WE HAVE TO LIMIT IT TO THE FAMILY MEMBERS AND THEN BECAUSE WHEN WE DO OPEN TO THE PUBLIC THERE WILL BE SOME THERE'S A NUMBER THAT WILL HAVE TO BE CAPPED AT YOU KNOW, BASED ON SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE ROOM.

SO THAT WILL WE'D HAVE TO FIGURE OUT HOW MANY PUBLIC COULD ACTUALLY BE THERE, THAT KIND OF THING. SO THAT'S MY TAKE ON IT. AND THEN AT SOME POINT THE BOARD LIKE DR. RODRIGUEZ SAID IS GOING TO HAVE TO REVISIT THAT MOTION THAT WE CURRENTLY

ARE TRYING TO ABIDE BY. >> I I ALSO THINK MY MY PREFERENCE ALSO WOULD BE TO NOT HAVE THE PUBLIC AT THIS TIME SINCE WE HAVEN'T HAVEN'T TRIED THAT YET AND SINCE WE'RE GONNA HAVE GUESTS EITHER FAMILY MEMBERS OF THE OF THE BOARD MEMBERS BEING SWORN IN AND THE DISTRICT AT THIS TIME IS NOT CERTAIN ABOUT HOW THEY'RE GONNA BE HANDLING THE PUBLIC YET AT THE BEGINNING OF JANUARY. I THINK THAT'S A GOOD A GOOD COMPROMISE AND I CONCUR THAT WE NEED TO. IT NEEDS TO BE LOOKED AT AGAIN BY THE BY THE BOARD BECAUSE A I DON'T I WON'T GET INTO ALL THAT NOW BUT IT NEEDS TO BE AN AGENDA ITEM.

JEFF, YOU HEARD ABOUT YOU KNOW WHAT NEEDS TO BE REVISITED. THIS WHOLE IDEA.

>> ALL RIGHT. >> SO ANY FURTHER COMMENT MR. SMITH IS BORN.

I DO. WE CAN HAVE HIM WHICH WE MIGHT HAVE REMOVED FROM THE PUBLIC.

SO I'M I'M A LITTLE TORN BECAUSE I MEAN AFTER ALL MEMBERS ARE PUBLIC PEOPLE AS WELL. SO I MEAN I'M NOT I'M I'M ALL TORN DOWN THE DECISION THAT SAYS AS YOU KNOW, WE CAN HAVE ONE NOT THE OTHER AND WE DO IT. THAT MIGHT BE A LITTLE DIFFERENT VERSUS JUST SAYING THAT WE CAN HAVE ONE IT CAN HAVE THE OTHER.

>> I'M NOT I'M NOT I'M NOT I'M NOT SURE I'M SHOWING THIS ON THIS BUT YEAH, WELL IF I UNDERSTAND HOW YOU'RE SAYING THEY'RE BOTH PUBLIC I AGREE THEY'RE OBVIOUSLY THE FAMILY MEMBERS OF THE BOARD MEMBERS BEING SWORN IN OR NOT ARE NOT BOARD MEMBERS.

THEY'RE CITIZENS LIKE THE PUBLIC. HOWEVER, YOU HAVE TO REMEMBER THAT THE FAMILY MEMBERS WOULD BE PEOPLE THAT HAVE ARE IN THIS TYPICALLY THE SAME HOUSEHOLD AS THE BOARD MEMBER. AND IF YOU'RE BRINGING IN. SO YOU'RE IN TERMS OF SPREAD OF DISEASE, YOU KNOW, IF YOU'RE KEEPING IT TO THE PEOPLE THAT ARE IN THAT HOUSEHOLD AS OPPOSED TO MULTIPLE HOUSEHOLDS WITH THROUGHOUT THROUGHOUT THE PUBLIC OR THROUGHOUT CITIZENS, THAT'S THE WAY I WOULD LOOK AT IT. I'M JUST LOOKING AT IT AS A SCIENTIFIC DISEASE STANDPOINT AND I UNDERSTAND WHERE YOU'RE YOU KNOW HOW YOU'RE TORN

BETWEEN THE TWO. DR. RODRIGUEZ YEAH. >> I THINK THE OTHER OPTION THAT THE BOARD COULD THINK ABOUT IS IF THEY IF THE FAMILY CAME IN YOU KNOW, AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE SWEARING IN CEREMONY THEY COULD LEAVE AND NOT STAY FOR THE REST OF THE MEETING. SO THEY'D BE IN BRIEFLY DURING THIS DURING THE SWEARING IN CEREMONY AND THEN AND THEN EXIT IF THAT'S JUST CAME TO MY MIND WHILE WE'RE TALKING SO AT THE FIRST MEETING IS NOT REALLY THE FIRST MEETING OF THE YEAR IS NOT REALLY A MEETING IS READ

JUST TO PICK GOOD OFFICES. >> MY IF I IF I REMEMBER WHEN I WHEN I SWORN WE WE WE WE JUST KIND OF PICKED OFFICES AND DID DIFFERENT DID DID DIFFERENT POSSIBLY FOR THE A'S BOARD AND

[01:45:03]

IN AND OUT. >> JANET? YES.

THANKS I. THANKS. WELL, I WASN'T I WASN'T OBVIOUSLY WASN'T AROUND AT THAT TIME. SO I APPRECIATE THAT CONTEXT IS

THIS ELECTION. >> YES. SO YEAH, MAKES SENSE.

SO WHAT'S THE WILL OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE? I THINK WE ALLOW THE FAMILY

MEMBERS. >> THAT'S MY PREFERENCE ALSO. MR. SMITH, WE TOOK NO VOTE ON

HIS OWN. >> I WILL HAVE STATE COMO STATE.

>> OK. SO DO WE NEED TO TAKE A VOTE ON THIS?

>> YEAH, I'LL SEE WHY NOT. >> I'LL BE FINE TO MAKE A MOTION.

I I MOVE THAT FAMILY MEMBERS OF THOSE NEW BOARD MEMBERS BEING SWORN IN ON JANUARY 5TH BE ALLOWED TO ATTEND THE MEETING OR THE SWEARING IN PROCESS.

>> AND KATHY, I THINK YOU BETTER TAKE OUT THE WORD NEW BOARD MEMBERS BECAUSE BOARD

MEMBERS. >> YES, IN THAT GROUP. >> OK.

AND THE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD. DO WE HAVE A SECOND SWORN IN? >> HOLD ON.

COULD IT BE DANGEROUS? YOU CAN CONTINUE THE MEETING TO TO OF MOVE THAT THE FAMILY MEMBERS OF THE BOARD MEMBERS BEING SWORN IN ON JANUARY 5TH 20 21 WILL BE ALLOWED TO ATTEND THE SWEARING IN FOR BE ALLOWED TO ATTEND THE MEETING BE ALLOWED TO BE ALLOWED TO ATTEND

THE MEETING IN PERSON. >> MR. DR. RODRIGUEZ. YEAH.

I'M SORRY. THIS JUST CAME TO ME IS ACTUALLY REALLY NONE OF MY BUSINESS BUT IT'S SORT OF A PROCEDURAL THING THAT THAT I JUST WANT TO POINT OUT IS THAT THE DECISION I THINK THE DECISION TO NOT HAVE ANYBODY AT THE MEETINGS WAS THAT A FULL BOARD VOTE. AND AND IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO MAKE A DIFFERENT VOTE OR A DIFFERENT OPINION ON RIGHT NOW WITHOUT A FULL BOARD. JUST TO I'M JUST TRYING TO AVOID ANY MANY ISSUES AROUND THAT. SO I DON'T KNOW THE ANSWER TO

THIS BEYOND DECEMBER 8TH AGENDA . >> THINK THIS IS AN OFFICES JUST THOSE OFFICES THAT SAID THAT THAT AGENDA IS AN AGENDA THAT WE'RE GOOD AND SETTING

THAT AGENDA MAKES IT SO THE MOTION WAS SECONDED. >> YES.

YES. >> MRS.. >> OKAY.

>> SO I'M NOT GOING TO BE HERE BUT YOU KNOW, YOU'RE IT'S A LITTLE AMBIGUOUS.

FAMILY MEMBERS ARE WE TALKING ABOUT IMMEDIATE FAMILY? ARE YOU GETTING AN A LIMIT PER PERSON? CAN YOU HAVE EXTENDED FAMILY? YOU KNOW, I THINK YOUR SAFEST BET IS TO OPEN IT UP TO THE PUBLIC AND I DON'T THINK YOU'LL GET A HUGE TURN AT ALL.

BUT WE DID HAVE A HUGE TURNOUT FOR THE LAST SWEARING IN CEREMONY, ONE OF THE BIGGEST STEPS SEEN ACTUALLY. BUT I WOULD SAY MAYBE YOU'RE ON THE SIDE AND OPEN IT TO THE PUBLIC. THEY LIKE TO BE THERE FOR THAT. IF THEY'RE SO INTERESTED, WE ARE OPENING THE SCHOOLS. NOT TO VISITORS NECESSARILY BUT CERTAINLY TO ALL OF OUR STUDENTS. FIVE DAYS A WEEK. AND I THINK THIS WOULD WOULD BE A GOOD CHOICE. I THINK THE BOARD MAY WANT TO WEIGH IN.

I THINK THERE'S SOME MERIT TO WHAT DR. RODRIGUEZ SAID. YOU SET THE AGENDA.

BUT WHO COMES TO THE MEETING DOES NOT NECESSARILY THE PURVIEW OF THE OFFICERS ALONE.

SO I WOULD I WOULD SAY I THINK DR. RODRIGUEZ GETS IT RIGHT HERE.

MAYBE WE COULD PUT THIS IN FRONT THE BOARD AT OUR NEXT BOARD MEETING TO SEE IF WE WANT TO OPEN UP THE SWEARING IN CEREMONY WHICH IS IMPORTANT TO THE PUBLIC AT LARGE.

>> WOULD YOU WILL YOU WILL DO WHAT YOU WOULD DO WITH THE MOTION? KATHY, WATCH THIS ROBOT. I MEAN THAT WAS GREAT. I SEE EVERY HAND.

YEAH, I'M I'M. IT'S STILL YOU KNOW. YES.

[01:50:05]

OK, AND I JUST THINK YOU'RE I MEAN IT'S FINE TO HAVE IT AS ANOTHER BOARD ITEM.

>> IT'S GONNA BE WHAT IT. THAT'S FINE. LET'S HAVE IT AS A BOARD ITEM ON ON DECEMBER 8. BUT THAT MAY GO INTO MORPH INTO THE OTHER THING IS NOT JUST THIS MEETING FOR THE SWEARING IN BUT THEN HOW ARE WE GOING TO CHANGE GOING FORWARD? WE MAY NOT REALLY HAVE THAT MUCH MORE INFORMATION YET BECAUSE WE'LL BE DECEMBER 8 AND THIS MEETING IS NOT TILL JANUARY 5TH. THAT IS CERTAINLY A LOT CAN HAPPEN IN THAT TIME. ESPECIALLY IN TERMS OF THE VIRUS WE WERE ALL READING THAT THE VIRUSES IS MORE PREVALENT NOW IN OUR AREA THAN HAD PREVIOUSLY BEEN.

SO YOU KNOW, THERE'S IT'S NOT ALL CUT AND DRY AND I HAVEN'T I DON'T THINK I'M I'M AT TODAY THAT I'M I WOULD SUPPORT BECAUSE THERE ARE TOO MANY UNKNOWNS.

>> JUST WIDE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC . I JUST I I THINK THAT'S.

BUT YOU KNOW, IT'S A MONTH MORE THAN A MONTH FROM NOW. I JUST THINK THAT MAYBE ASKING FOR I DON'T KNOW THAT JUST THAT DOESN'T SIT WELL WITH ME. I'LL JUST SAY THAT AS A

PHYSICIAN IT DOESN'T SIT WELL WITH ME OR MR. ROBOT. >> I THINK THAT WE ADDED TO DECEMBER 8TH AND YOUR BOARD ACTION BUSINESS AND JUST LIMIT IT TO PARTICIPANTS.

PARTICIPANTS ATTENDANCE AT THE JANUARY 5TH BOARD MEETING. SO ARE YOU WITHDRAWING A MOTION

? >> I'M NOT SURE YET. WILLIAM, I HAVE TO I HAVE TO THINK THIS OUT. WELL, WE CAN VOTE THE MOTION DOWN.

I HAVE TO WITHDRAW. I WOULD SAY THAT WE WE VOTE ON IT AND THEN WE CAN VOTE IT DOWN RATHER THAN WITHDRAW IT SO THAT WE HAVE A RECORD OF EVERYTHING THAT WE'VE DISCUSSED.

>> ROB POINT OF ORDER, SIR. POINT OF ORDER MANAGER. SO IT HAS TO BE EITHER WITHDRAWN AND WE HAVE TO VOTE TO WITHDRAW IT OR IT HAS TO BE VOTED VOTED ON.

>> AS MR. OBAMA HAS SAID, IT CANNOT JUST BE SHE. SHE CANNOT JUST SAY SHE'S WITHDRAWING. IT HAS TO BE VOTED ON TO BE WITHDRAWN BECAUSE IT'S BEEN SECONDED, SIR. RIGHT. AND THAT'S WHY I SURE WISH YOU HAVE JOINED US SO I COULD HAVE TO MOVE FORWARD TO REMEMBER WE WERE GOING TO VOTE TO WITHDRAW OR WHATEVER WE WANT TO GO. WE WERE GOING TO VOTE TO KEEP THE MOTION.

SO THAT'S WHY I WENT TO ASK HER TO GIVE ME CLARIFICATIONS AND KNOW WHAT MY NEXT THAT WILL MY

NEXT STEP WOULD BE. >> THAT'S CORRECT. YES.

>> I'M JUST LETTING YOU KNOW THAT I KNOW THAT I GOT THE GIST OF IT.

THANK YOU. >> SO. >> SO WHILE WE'RE WITH THAT

NOTION I WAS MISERABLE. GO AHEAD VOTE. >> OH CHECHESSEE YOU HAD YOUR HAND UP. OH, I DIDN'T TAKE IT DOWN. NO, MA'AM.

>> OKAY. SO THIS TIME WE CAN GO AHEAD. NOT ALL IN FAVOR.

ALL IN FAVOR. ALL OPPOSED. NAY.

I MEAN I'M OPPOSED. YOUR POST STILL ABSTENTIONS. I'LL ABSTAIN.

>> AND NOW WE'LL ABSTAIN AS WELL. SO ANNOUNCED ABOUT OH SO ARE WE HAVE WE HAVE ONE NO VOTE. AND WE TWO ABSTENTIONS. THE TWO CITIES ARE ARMED.

IS THAT WHAT OUR QUESTION OF WATCH IS? WELCOME MRS. SMITH.

SO WE'RE WE'LL GUESS WE'RE BACK. WE'RE BACK.

I GUESS WE WILL HAVE THAT. WE NEED NOT TO MAKE A MOTION ANOTHER MOTION AND NEED A

MOTION TO ADD IT TO THE AGENDA. >> YEAH, OK. >> HOW ABOUT MAKING THAT MOTION? I'LL TAKE THE MEETING BACK. ONE OF YOU CAN A MIGHT GO.

>> I MOVE THAT WE ADD TO THE UNDER BROAD BUSINESS ACTION ADD TO THE DECEMBER 8TH MEETING PARTICIPATION OF FAMILY MEMBER OF BOARD MEMBERS FAMILY ATTENDING THE SWEARING IN

[01:55:04]

PARTICIPATION OF FAMILY MEMBERS . >> OF BOARD MEMBERS BEING SWORN

IN FOR FAMILY MEMBERS CARRIED MS. >> RIBAUT.

I DID SAY FAMILY MEMBERS WHILE THE SHE SAID FAMILY MEMBERS OR PUBLIC AND WE WOULD DISCUSS

THAT. >> I'M NOT INCLUDING PUBLIC IN MY MOTION THE PARTICIPATION OF FAMILY MEMBERS OF BOARD MEMBERS BEING SWORN IN ON JANUARY 5TH.

>> ONE WAS THAT IT? >> YEAH. I MOVE THAT WE ALLOW THE

PARTICIPATION I GUESS RIGHT. >> MOVE UNDER BOARD BUSINESS. DECEMBER 8TH THAT WE DISCUSSED MEETING MOVE UNDER BOARD BUSINESS ACTION ON THE DECEMBER 8TH MEETING THE PARTICIPATION OF FAMILY MEMBERS OF BOARD MEMBERS BEING SWORN IN ON JANUARY 5TH 20 21 NO.

>> YES MAYBE MOVE THAT FAMILY MEMBER OF IT. >> CAN YOU PUT IT LIKE THIS?

I NEED SOMEONE TO SECOND IT FOR ME TO PUT IT UP. >> SO I THINK THIS IS I THINK IT'S UP THERE. I KNOW IT'S NOT UP THERE FOR LAST ONE.

>> THAT WAS THE LAST ONE. >> I HAVE MOVE UNDER BOARD BUSINESS ACTION ON THE DECEMBER 8TH MEETING THE PARTICIPATION OF FAMILY MEMBERS OF BOARD MEMBERS BEING SWORN IN ON JANUARY 5TH TWENTY TWENTY ONE ACTUALLY WHAT I'M MOVING IS THAT WE ADD TO BOARD BUSINESS ACTION RIGHT THE TO ADD TO BOARD BUSINESS ACTION AND THE DECEMBER 8TH MEETING MOVED TO ADD TO BOARD BUSINESS ACTION ON DECEMBER 8TH MEETING THE PARTICIPATION FAMILY MEMBERS

OF BOARD MEMBERS BEING SWORN IN ON JANUARY 5TH 2021 YES. >> STARTING WITH US ASKING FOR

DISCUSSION. KATHY SORRY. >> IS MY HAND STILL UP? YEAH I'VE NOTHING TO ADD. I JUST THINK THAT WHAT I'M TRYING TO DO IS HAVE THE ENTIRE BOARD SINCE THERE MAY BE SOME QUESTION AS TO WHETHER THE OFFICERS DO HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO CHANGE THAT JUST TO RECOGNIZE THAT AT YOU KNOW THAT WE ALLOW FAMILY MEMBERS OF THOSE BEING SWORN IN TO ATTEND THIS MEETING. MR. SMITH NOT MY BUT MY MOM.

MY CONCERN IS THAT WE ALLOW OUR MEMBERS AND NOT THE PUBLIC AND IN THIS KIND OF THAT THAT'S KIND OF A GRAY AREA. SO I THINK THAT WE SHOULD WE SHOULD DISCUSS BOTH OPTIONS AND NOT JUST ONE. SO I'M A LITTLE VARIANCE I SHOULD SAY RIBAUT SHOULD SUPPORT THIS MOTION THAT IT WOULD BE MORE INCLINED TO SUPPORT IT IF IT'S HERE OR PUBLIC OR AND PUBLIC THAT THAT'S A PART THE DISCUSSION. SO THAT'S WHERE I MET WHEN WE OPEN UP OUR VOTING NOW I CAN GIVE MY HUSBAND AND I WAS JUST GOING SAY MR. SMITH, YOU COULD CERTAINLY MAKE THAT POINT WHEN WE WON WE DISCUSSED IT ON THE 8TH.

>> SO WAS IT? YEAH I SAID YOU CAN DISCUSS AT I DON'T THINK THIS PRECLUDE YOU

[02:00:09]

FROM DISCUSSING THAT RIGHT? >> THAT'S RIGHT. THAT'S FINE.

OKAY. ALL RIGHT. VOTING IS OPEN.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR. THE MOTION THAT'S DISPLAYED ON THE SCREEN IN FRONT OF YOU

PLEASE SAY I I KNOW ABSTENTION. >> OKAY SO THE MOTION CARRIES TO 0 1.

MR. SMITH ABSTAINED. ALL RIGHT. >> DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER ACTION ? LET'S MAKE A MOTION THAT WE ADJOURN.

>> ALL RIGHT. >> A SECOND TALKING. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR.

I WILL ADJOURN.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.