[00:00:02]
YES, SIR. >> GOOD MORNING, EVERYONE. >> WELCOME TO OUR SOUTH
[11:00am Call to Order]
EVALUATION COMMITTEE BEFORE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION. AND WE'D LIKE TO BEGIN THIS MEETING BY SETTING A PLACE THAT COUNTY CHANNEL HAS BEEN. THE MEDIA HAS BEEN INFORMED THEM OUR WE WILL BE LIVE ON THE COUNTY CHANNEL SO I'D LIKE TO BEGIN BY SAYING PLEDGEOF ALLEGIANCE THESE THAT CAN HEAR ME. >> WE READY?
>> I PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE PUBLIC WHICH IS ONE OF THE NATION INDIVISIBLE WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL.
FOR A MINUTE THAT WAS MUTED AS ONE O K. NOW WE NEED MOTION TO APPROVE
[Approval of Agenda]
THE AGENDA AS LISTED. I KNOW THAT WE APPROVE THE AGENDA FOR THE NOVEMBER 7 TAKE COMMITTEE MEETING OUR SECOND ACTUALLY I APOLOGIZE I SHOULD HAVE SAID THE AGENDA YEAH FORNOVEMBER 5TH. MY MISTAKE. >> NOW THIS TODAY IS GENERAL
BUT YOU GET THE IDEA. >> YOU'RE CORRECT. THE DAY'S AGENDA RIGHT THE LOSER WILL BE THE SECOND DAY WE APPROVED AGENDA FOR NOVEMBER 17TH.
>> MAYBE IT DISCUSSION REALLY FOR THE VOTE. >> ALL IN FAVOR I WRITE.
>> I END IT. OBJECTION. NON HEARD MOTION CARRIES 4 0 0 K THOUGH IT'S PUBLIC COMMENTS. WE GOT WE DIDN'T HAVE ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS.
[Approval of the November 5, 2020 Committee Meeting Minutes]
>> ALL RIGHT. MINUTES FROM THE LAST MEETING THE NOVEMBER FIRST MEETING.
THERE WE GO. >> I MAKE A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE NOVEMBER 5TH COMMITTEE
MEETING. >> O K JUSTICE I GO BACK AND WRITE DISCUSSION.
OKAY. ALL IN FAVOR OF . >> RIGHT.
OKAY. WILLIAM HERE WILL I? >> FOR 0.
WAS THAT I FROM EVERYONE? YES. THAT WAS A LIE FOR EVERYONE.
>> MAYBE WE BEGIN ON PAGE 7. WELL WE GO TO 9 10 LOVERS TAKE THOSE YELLOW PAGES.
[Discussion of Board’s Self Evaluation Instruments]
>> MY QUESTION IS ARE WE GOING TO COME TO SOME CONCLUSION ON HOW MANY IDEALS WE ARE GOING TO
HAVE ON THIS EVALUATION? >> CAN YOU HEAR ME? >> OK, ALL RIGHT.
BUT SCAHILL SOMETIMES I DON'T KNOW THAT I DON'T KNOW THAT WE COULD DETERMINE THAT WITH CERTAINTY UNTIL WE GO THROUGH THE QUESTIONS AND SEE WHAT WE END UP WITH AND THEN GO BACK AND SEE IF THERE ARE ANY THAT ARE DUPLICATES UNLESS THAT'S MY POINT RIGHT NOW BEFORE WE I THINK WE ARE QUITE A FEW OF THOSE LAST THREE SECTIONS DUPLICATES.
>> BUT I'LL SAY THAT WE WERE AT I THINK 60 OR 61 QUESTIONS RIGHT NOW FROM I DEFINITELY
[00:05:06]
AGREE WITH THEM. >> I DISAGREE WITH RESEARCH. SO ARE WE GOING TO GO THROUGH HIM? I JUST WANT YOU TO BE MINDFUL OF WHERE WE ARE.
SIXTY ONE ALREADY AND WE GOT 30 DAYS MORE TO GO THROUGH THE DAY.
>> OK, SO WE CAN START WITH A BETTER STORY. >> PAGE 9 WITH ASHLEY MINOR LEGAL STEPS CORRECT? ANALYTIC CORRECT. OK.
ALL RIGHT. NUMBER ONE, I'VE BEEN IN BOARD MEETINGS WITH SUBTLETIES
OF ISSUES DEALT WITH. >> OH REALLY? >> RIGHT.
I'VE BEEN IN BOARD MEETINGS WHERE SUBTLETIES OF ISSUES DEALT WITH ESCAPE THE BOARD
EVER WRITTEN. RIGHT. >> I UNDERSTAND THE STATEMENT THAT YES. I THINK THAT WE SAID SOME TIME IN THE ISSUES WE REALLY
UNDERSTAND ON PROCESS FACTS THAT I SAY TO ME TO DELETE. >> YEAH, DELETE.
NUMBER TWO OR EXPLICITLY EXAMINE THAT DOWNSIDE OF ALL POSSIBLE PITFALLS OF ANY
IMPORTANT DECISION. >> IT IS ABOUT TO MAKE MR. CAMPBELL.
>> YES. IS I WOULD SUGGEST THAT WE CHANGE THAT TO READ BOARD
EXPLICITLY EXAMINES THE IMPACT OF ANY IMPORTANT DECISION. >> IT IS ABOUT TO MAKE.
THEREFORE IT'S NOT A LEADING QUESTION TO ONLY BE THE DOWNFALLS BUT MAYBE THE UPSIDE AS WELL. SO IF WE JUST CHANGE IT TO IMPACT IT MIGHT BE MORE OF A
YOU KNOW, A BETTER QUESTION. >> WE'LL EXAMINE THE IMPACT OF THIS DECISION.
WHAT'S THE OTHER PART OF IT? >> OF ANY IMPORTANT DECISION IT IS ABOUT TO MAKE ME OR IT EXPRESSLY EXAMINES THE IMPACT OF ANY IMPORTANT DECISIONS IT'S ABOUT TO MAKE.
>> RIGHT. BECAUSE THAT THAT'S BROADER. IT DOES TALK ABOUT AND I DON'T JUST HAVE TO BE DOWNSIDE IMPACTS. THEY COULD BE SIDEWAYS IMPACTS.
THEY COULD REALLY UNDERSTAND THE REASONING. THAT'S RIGHT.
YEAH. >> OK, THAT'S GOOD. I AGREE WITH THAT.
I AGREE. >> ALL RIGHT. LET'S MOVE TO THREE ALL QUESTIONS ADMINISTRATIVELY. PROPOSALS REQUIRING THE SUPERINTENDENT TO DEFEND OR RECONSIDER HIS OR HER RECOMMENDATION THIS ONE. GO ON, HIT SOME NERVES, MR. MET. MAY I MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO YOU?
>> YOU CAN ALWAYS MAKE A RECOMMENDATION. >> I WOULD SUGGEST THAT MAYBE WE CHANGE OUR TWO BOARD QUESTIONS ADMINISTRATIVE PROPOSALS REQUIRING THE SUPERINTENDENT TO SUPPORT HIS OR HER RECOMMENDATION WITH DATA INSTEAD OF DEFENSE SUPPORT.
COME AGAIN. >> WHICH ONE IS THAT NOW MR. CAMPBELL NUMBER THREE WILL NUMBER THREE BOARD QUESTIONS ADMINISTRATIVE PROPOSALS REQUIRING A SUPERINTENDENT TO DEFEND TRICIA MISS REG SAID THAT SHE'D RATHER, YOU KNOW, BE READ DIFFERENTLY BY HIM BY REPLACING THE FELLOW. I LIKE THAT. THAT'S WHAT YOU SAID.
OH MY. NOW LISTEN CAREFULLY. NO, THAT'S THAT'S OK.
RECORD VERSUS TAMPERING SIMPERING REQUIRING THE SUPERINTENDENT TO SUPPORT.
>> HERE'S OUR HER RECOMMENDATIONS WITH DATA, OK. >> OK, I'M KING.
>> WELL LET ME LET KICK CAN YOU CAN YOU REPEAT THAT AGAIN? RIGHT.
SO. SO I'M SUGGESTING WE TAKE OUT THE LAST PART OF THAT.
[00:10:06]
DEFEND OR RECONSIDER HIS OR HER RECOMMENDATION? I WOULD.I'M SUGGESTING WE TAKE THAT OUT AND REPLACE IT WITH SUPPORT HIS OR HER RECOMMENDATION WITH DATA
. >> WELL, DATA HELPS BUT OUR I REALLY I'M A STICKLER OF DATA BECAUSE IT OFFENDED YOU CAN MAKE DATA LOOK HOW EVER YOU WANT DATA TO LOOK.
SO YOU KNOW THAT DESK THAT'S REAL QUESTIONABLE DATA. YOU KNOW? BUT I GUESS BIG DATA IS DRIVING FORCES IN DATA. THERE HAS TO BE I WOULD BE GOD
THIS IS BUT THAT'S FAR FROM THAT'S FINE. >> WELL YEAH I DON'T THINK YOU WILL. I DON'T THINK THAT THERE IS A BIG PART OF WHAT THEY'RE ASKING THERE IS ASKING TO MAKE SURE THAT WE INVENTED WHAT THE PROPOSAL IS WITH ALL THE FACTS.
IF YOU JUDGE A SET OF DATA ABOUT AND WE CAN AFFORD HIS PROPOSAL UP OR DOWN, WE JUST MAKING SURE THAT HE'S DONE A THOROUGH INVESTIGATION BEFORE HE DOES A PRESENTATION THAT'S I THINK THAT'S THE TENOR OF THAT QUESTION. OK.
JOANNE. YEAH. SOUNDS GOOD TO ME NOW.
>> NO FOR THEM BOARD IS ATTEMPTING TO HAVE TO HOW IT REACHES CONCLUSIONS WAS ATTENDED TO HOW IT REACHES CONCLUSION NO KNOW WHAT THAT MEANS.
I SAY SCRATCH IT RIGHT. >> THAT'S WHAT I GOT TO BELIEVE.
I JUST GOT MEANING A QUESTION MARK OVER OKATIE UNANIMOUS. SO I DELETED TWO PEOPLE HAVEN'T
WEIGHED IN YET. ALWAYS ONE NUMBER FOR I AGREE. >> OKAY.
>> THREE TO THE FIRM GETS MY IT'S ALL RIGHT. >> NUMBER FIVE YES.
LET'S GO TO FIVE SESSIONS OF THE BOTH ON ONE ISSUE TEND TO INFLUENCE HOW IT HANDLES OTHER ISSUES. AMY I'M FINE WITH THAT QUESTION .
DAVE JOY. >> YES. YEAH, THAT LOOKS GOOD.
I THINK IT'S RELEVANT. YEAH, I GUESS THAT VERY GOOD WORD TO HEAR.
>> THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT I WAS GOING TO SAY NOW. BE MINDFUL THAT THESE QUESTIONS ARE QUESTIONS THAT WE SHOULD BE ASSUMING IT IS RELEVANT IN TERMS OF THE BOARD EVALUATING AND SELLS NOT NECESSARILY WHETHER WE DO IT OR DON'T DO IT OR AGREE OR OH YOU KNOW THE
BASIC IDEA IS SHOULD WE DO IT? >> AND IF WE DO IT IS A MEASURABLE OK.
WHEN FACED WITH THAT ISSUE, THE BOARD ALL FELT BRAINSTORMS GENERATING A LIST OF CREATIVE
APPROACHES OR SOLUTIONS TO THE PROBLEM NOW. >> GLAD TO ADD ONE MORE THING I WOULD ADD HERE IS CLARIFYING LANGUAGE THAT 18 NOT TO DISTRICT OPERATIONS BECAUSE BRAINSTORMING ON DISTRICT OPERATIONS WOULD COME FROM ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF BUT THAT BRAINSTORMING WOULD SPECIFICALLY REFER TO A BOARD RELATED DILEMMA SUCH AS WE DID BRAINSTORMING WITH HOW TO SHORTEN MEETINGS AS ONE EXAMPLE OR TO BRAINSTORM ON HOW TO FIX
OPERATIONAL ISSUES. >> SO I WOULD JUST WANT TO ADD LET ME SEE HERE.
JUST DO WHEN FACED WITH AN IMPORTANT BOARD GOVERNED ISSUE PAY TO COMMENT ON THAT RULE.
I UNDERSTAND WHERE YOU'RE GOING WITH THAT JOY. BUT WHAT DO WE THAT.
[00:15:01]
I DON'T SAY WE BRAINSTORM. I DON'T KNOW WHAT BRAINSTORMING REALLY ENTAILS IN TERMS OF ITS MEANING. BUT DO WE NOT LET THE THINGS LOOSE? FRED KNIGHT IS IN DIALOG WITH MIGHT BE CONSIDERED BRAINSTORMING.>> THAT'S NOT NECESSARILY A BOARD DELIVERY ISSUE. >> WELL HERE I AM I.
>> I WENT TO THE VERBIAGE THAT MISSES OUR SHOW. GO ON WITH THAT.
I CERTAIN THAT WE AGREE WITH THAT. SO WE CAN BE STATE MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE STAYING CLEAR AND WE'RE DOING WHAT WE'RE WHAT WE'RE WHAT WE'RE SUPPOSED TO DO THAT WE'RE NOT IMPEDING ON OTHER OPERATIONS OR OTHER PARTS OF THE DISTRICT AND WE JUST SAY WE'RE JUST GLAD THAT IT HAS TO BE A MATTER UNDER THE PURVIEW OF THE BOARD.
>> SO THE ONLY WAY I CAN IS TO FIND WHAT I'M SAYING IS THROUGH THE USE OF EXAMPLES HERE YOU KNOW IT'S IF ALICE WALTON PRESENTS TO THE BOARD A PRESENTATION ON STAFFING FOR EXAMPLE AND DILEMMAS THAT THEY ARE CURRENTLY ENCOUNTERING. OK, IT'S REALLY NOT FOR THE BOARD. BLAINE STORM SOLUTIONS IN THAT PARTICULAR INSTANCE AS REFERENCE REFERENCES A OPERATIONS ISSUE. AND THE EXAMPLE I CITED FOR A BOARD RELATED MATTER OUR MEETINGS FOR EXAMPLE. THAT IS PURVIEW.
WE HAVE THE BOOKINGS MEETING THAT IS DANGEROUS SINCE WE ALSO BRAINSTORM WHEN IT CAME TO GOVERNANCE AND OTHER THINGS LIKE BOARD RELATED BILL RELATED STUFF THAT ACTUALLY THE INPUT OF THE OPERATE OPERATION OR ADMINISTRATOR WAS NOT PROPERLY THAT IT COULD NOT BE INPUT
BRAINSTORMING. >> SO I AGREE WITH THAT. I GUESS FISHER.
>> YEAH MAKES SENSE. OKAY. NO.
OH NO. LET ME GO BACK. >> SO I HAVE WHEN FACED WITH AN IMPORTANT BOARD ISSUE THE BOARD OFTEN WITH WHEN FACED WITH AN IMPORTANT BOARD GOVERNANCE ISSUE THE BOARD OFTEN BRAINSTORMS GENERATING A LIST. LEAVE THE REST OF IT.
ALL RIGHT. >> SEVEN BOARD SEATS OUTSIDE JUSTICE FROM THE JURORS OR
OTHER DISTRICTS. >> WHEN CONSIDERING ITS WORK, CAN WE DO THAT?
>> YES. THE TAPE WE DO WE HAVE TO AGREE MAY.
THE BOARD DOES NOT SET NEW TERMS OR THE COMPLEX NEW RULE IS NOT PRESENT.
>> NEW ISSUES ARE A COMPLEX NATURE FOR IMMEDIATE ACTION. >> THE ROLL IT UP OR DOWN WHERE WE VOTE IS THERE I SAY ONE THESE MEDIA I WOULD REMOVE THAT ONE WOULD BE MY INCLINATION
THEIR NUMBER NINE. >> YEAH. NO, NO.
A MORE AID GREAT. >> YEAH. I GET TO THE REASONING I WAS
THERE REASON WHY YOU WOULD NOT WANT THAT THERE. >> WELL BECAUSE IT'S IT'S NOT PERMITTED BY LAW. YOU CAN'T ADD SOMETHING TO AN AGENDA DESIGNED IT'S NOT ALREADY BEEN APPROVED ON THE AGENDA. NO I'M SAYING TO THAT WOULD INDICATE SOMEHOW SOME WAY THAT THE BOARD IS INTERJECTING NEW ISSUES FOR IMMEDIATE ACTION.
THE ONLY WAY IT CAN TAKE ACTION IS IN THE CONTEXT OF A OF A PUBLIC MEETING.
SO I DON'T LIKE WHAT THAT INDICATES. I THINK WE NEED TO GET RID OF THAT SAY. THIS IS ROGER BRINGS ATTENTION TO THE BOARD WITHIN ITSELF FROM TRYING TO BRING UP ISSUES OF TRYING TO IMPORT THINGS INTO THE AGENDA OR TRYING TO MAKE THINGS OUT OF SOMETHING ELSE ALREADY. SO I THINK THIS IS THIS BRINGS
[00:20:01]
ENOUGH STEAM TO THE BOARD NOW. >> IF YOU WANTED TO CHANGE THAT TO SAY THE BOARD ONLY PRESENTS OR IF YOU WANT TO MAKE IT SPECIFIC TO THE AGENDA AND THAT MAYBE THE BOARD ONLY INTRODUCED NEW ITEMS ON AN AGENDA UNDER EMERGENCY OR EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES WE CAN DO THAT.
BUT THAT'S ALREADY WRITTEN INTO LAW AND WHERE WE'RE FOLLOWING THAT.
>> WE ALWAYS DO THAT. YEAH. WE GOT IT.
WE GOT TO FOLLOW THAT AND WE HAVE SEVERAL INDICATORS THUS FAR ON THIS TOOL THAT SAYS WE
MUST FOLLOW LAW. RIGHT. >> AND WE I MEAN THAT'S WHY WE DON'T AND REALLY INTEGRATE OURSELVES ON A SET OF , YOU KNOW, A LOT OF GRADING OURSELVES RIGHT NOW BY IN THAT MAKES SENSE TO KNOW HOW BAD OUR AID BE PLACE WITH SOMETHING LIKE ONCE THE AGENDA IS APPROVED BY THE BOARD THE BOARD DOES NOT INTRODUCE NEW TOPICS
OR ADDITIONAL TOPICS. >> I'M LESS DEEMED AN EMERGENCY OR EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES.
SO THAT'S A POLICY THAT YOU PROBABLY WANT TO SQUEEZE IN MY MIND OR IMPORTANTLY NOW THAT'S
ALREADY ESTABLISHED IN LAW, RIGHT? >> SO IN MY MIND THAT'S THAT'S MY RIGHT. THERE IS THE SAME STATEMENT GREETING WILL WELL WE FOLLOW THE LAW NOT. RIGHT. THAT LINE IS DO WE PRESENT NEW THINGS AND APPROPRIATELY MAKE DECISIONS ON ITS WE DO. THAT ANSWER SHOULD BE ZERO OR ONE. IF WE ADOPT THEN NINE OR 10 THAT QUESTION COVERS EVERYTHING
YOU WANT TO ADDRESS. >> TURNS OUT THE AGENDA ITEM DOES NOT PRESENT NEW ITEM NEW
ISSUES OF A FAT PIG. >> I LIKE YOUR REASONING WHAT YOU READING?
YOU CAN GO BACK TO KEEP IT THE WAY IT IS. >> I MEAN I DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU WANT TO CHANGE EXCEPT IN WHAT JAY'S ISSUES TWO ITEMS ON THE AGENDA TO YOU.
>> THE POINT IS NOT PERSONAL. YOU WANT TO LEAVE HERE? HUH? YEAH, I THINK THAT COVERS MORE THAN JUST THE AGENDA TOPICS THAT COVERS SOMETHING THAT WE
MAY NEED TO VET AND BRING IT UP TONIGHT IN DUE PROCESS. >> BUT DIDN'T GIVE US A REPORTING STUDY THE PRINCIPAL SUPERINTEND GET A CHANCE TO LOOK AT IT IN A BATTLE AND WE'VE GOT IT ON THE AGENDA. SOMETHING WE NEED TO MAKE A DECISION ALL WELL.
>> SO I WOULD KEEP THE FIGHTING. YOU'RE SAYING GET RID OF COMPLEX NATURE BECAUSE WE CANNOT WE CAN INTRODUCE ANYTHING NEW COMPLEX OR SIMPLE FOR IMMEDIATE ACTION UNLESS IT'S ALREADY ON THAT AGENDA UNLESS IT'S LAW.
>> YEAH WELL THAT'S MY POINT. IT'S NOT JUST ABOUT THE AGENDA. WHAT ABOUT.
LET ME GIVE YOU AN EXAMPLE. WELL, LET ME GIVE YOU EXAMPLE JUST RECENTLY WE DEVALUATION LITTLE THE RESOLUTION THOSE THINGS WERE ON THE AGENDA BUT THEY WERE SO COMPLEX AND REALLY
HAVE WE'LL HAVE TIME TO VET IT BUT THEY WANTED US ACT ON IT. >> BUT BUT WE ABSOLUTELY WE WANT RAY TO ACT ON IT AND THAT'S THAT'S OUR FORWARD AS A BOARD AS A BOARD COLLECTIVELY
BECAUSE THAT'S SOMETHING THAT SHOULD HAPPEN. >> SO THE QUESTION IS SAYING WELL THAT'S WHAT EXACTLY AS OUR FAULT. YOU'RE RIGHT AND ALWAYS THIS IS
A AGREEING ON WHETHER WE DO IT OR NOT. >> YOU'RE ABSOLUTELY RIGHT.
>> IT'S OUR FAULT. AND THAT'S ALL I'M SAYING IS THAT ADDRESSES THAT LANDED ADDRESS IS MORE THAN JUST AGENDA ITEM ADDRESSES PEOPLE PUSHING OTHER THINGS THROUGH
THE AGENDA WITHOUT PROPER VARY. >> MAYBE I'M WRONG MAN I. WE ALL HOLD IT JUST.
>> YES. >> THANK YOU. I DID NOT READ THIS QUESTION OF HAVING ANYTHING TO DO WITH THE AGENDA. I READ IT MORE ALONG THE LINES
[00:25:05]
OF EXACTLY AS MR. CAMPBELL JUST GAVE US AN EXAMPLE. I WAS THINKING OF SOME ANOTHER EXAMPLE THAT IF WE HAD TO DISCUSS ZONING FOR STUDENTS IT WAS ON YOU KNOW, IT WAS ON THE AGENDA. BUT THAT'S A VERY COMPLEX ISSUE.IF NEW INFORMATION CAME UP DURING THAT PARTICULAR TOPIC, WOULD WE BE READY FOR IMMEDIATE ACTION? SO I DON'T SEE THIS AS HAVING TO DO WITH THE AGENDA AT ALL.
>> I THINK IT'S A IT'S A VERY IMPORTANT ONE TO SELF EVALUATE ON.
>> YEAH. SO MY MY ONLY REASON WHY I TIED IT TO AN AGENDA IS BECAUSE OF THE WANTS IMMEDIATE ACTION AND THE THE BOARD CAN ONLY ACT IN THE CONTEXT OF A PUBLIC MEETING. SO I SEE THERE'S AN AGENDA BUT I SEE WHAT YOU'RE SAYING.
AND IF YOU FEEL STRONGLY IT SHOULD STAY AS IT IS UP. I'M FINE WITH THAT.
I THINK THAT THEY'RE TOOLS THAT THEY ARE ACTUALLY TWO SEPARATE THINGS.
THIS ONE IS UNDER THE ANALYTICAL SECTION SO I'M LOOKING AT THESE USE MORE AS HOW BOARDS MAKE DECISIONS VERSUS PROCEDURAL WHICH IS WHAT I HEAR YOU SAYING.
AND SO PERHAPS PERHAPS THERE WOULD BE ROOM FOR ANOTHER QUESTION THAT DOES DEAL JUST WITH WHAT YOU'RE SUGGESTING. JOANNE WELL AGAIN I'M I'M I MAY HAVE A VERY OVERLY SIMPLIFIED IN MY MIND ACTION IS SYNONYMOUS WITH THE WORD GO WHEN I HEAR A THOUGHT THEN IT MEANS VOTE TO ME AND QUITE AUTOMATICALLY A TIE TO AN AGENDA AND A MEETING A PUBLIC MEETING.
>> SO THAT'S THE WORDING IS YOU KNOW, VERY LEADING. FOR ME WHEN I SEE THAT.
BUT I'M OK WITH. WE'RE OKAY TO LEAVE IT AS IS. MY INTERPRETATION IS DIFFERENT.
BECAUSE OF THE WORD ACTION IT DOES MEANS TO END. >> BUT WHAT THE QUESTION IS I MEAN AS A BODY IS BURIED PROPERLY BEFORE YOU VOTE. OKAY.
HERE'S THE QUESTION. DO WE HAVE ADEQUATE TIME TO MAKE THAT DECISION BEFORE WE VOTE? I WILL POINT OUT CLARITY. YEAH.
MRS. FINCHER SAID THAT THAT THIS WAS UNDER CERTAIN SECTIONS.
I THOUGHT WE WHEN USING SECTIONS AND I THOUGHT THE THE. SHE SAID THAT IT WAS UNDER THE THE POLITICAL WAS A SECTION NOT THAT IT WAS BEST POLITICAL THAT'S THERE.
THAT'S THE RIGHT THERE. AND I WRITE ABOUT THEM WITH NOT ONE OR SHOT MENTIONED USING SECTIONS. I THOUGHT WE SAID THAT WE WERE NOT USING SECTION SO IT DIDN'T MATTER WHICH SECTION IT WAS UP UNDER BECAUSE MR. SMITH I'M NOT SUGGESTING THAT WE USE SECTION.
>> I'M JUST FACTS THAT A SECTION THAT IT'S ALREADY. SO I WAS JUST TRYING TO UNDERSTAND THE QUESTION THAT WAS JOHN IS IN AN ALREADY PREDETERMINED SECTION SO I WAS JUST TRYING TO UNDERSTAND THE QUESTION WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THAT CONTEXT WAY IT.
>> THAT'S THAT'S THAT'S TOO. SHE'S SAYING THAT THE PERSON WHO WROTE THIS QUESTION WROTE IT IN TERMS OF HOW DOES THE BOARD ANALYZE THINGS. THAT'S WHY IN THE ANALYTICAL
QUITE SECULAR AS OPPOSED TO THE PROCESS OR PROCEDURAL SECTION. >> SO NOW I AM.
AND TRICIA, I THINK I UNDERSTAND WHERE YOU'RE COMING FROM NOW.
SO IT'S YOU'RE REALLY SAYING HAVE WE HAD ADEQUATE TIME? T YES.
OKAY. AND THAT REALLY DOES GO BACK TO SLEEP.
I LOVE THE WE'VE HAD BEST FIRE WE'RE GETTING DOCUMENTS ON TIME OR WE YOU KNOW.
SO IS IT REDUNDANT? I DON'T KNOW. >> IT COULD BE A ONE WE ALREADY HAD. YEAH. YEAH I MEAN WHEN WE HAVE.
BUT THAT IS BASICALLY WHAT IT IS. DEBBIE WE REALLY DO BEFORE WE
CAN MAKE A DECISION THAT WE CAN PRESENTED WITH ENOUGH STUFF. >> TEAM NUMBER MAY 14 SAYS THAT I THINK YEAH I HAD SUFFICIENT TIME TO STUDY ISSUES BEFORE TAKING A VOTE ON AN ISSUE.
>> ALL RIGHT. >> SO THAT'S ALREADY COVERED . SO.
SO CROSS IT OUT. YEAH. SCRATCH IT LITERALLY TWICE.
>> BUT LET'S MAKE SURE THAT JOANNE'S CONCERN IS VETTED SOMEWHERE THAT THAT IS IN SOMETHING MAYBE PREVIOUSLY MAYBE WHEN WE GET THEM ALL DONE LIKE YOU SAY AND WRITE THEM ALL DOWN YOU CAN LOOK AT THEM AND SEE IF WE LEAVE TO FLOW TWO OR THREE MORE.
>> OK. IT'S NOT COVERED . OH, IT'S THE FINAL DECISION.
WE'RE LEAVING NUMBER EIGHT. AND CHANGING THE WORD TO ITEMS. NO, WE DID 0 8 0 0 0.
>> ALL RIGHT. >> NUMBER NINE BEFORE REACHING A DECISION ON IMPORTANT ISSUES
[00:30:08]
BOARD REQUEST INPUT FROM STUDENTS OR STAFF LIKELY TO BE AFFECTED BY THE DECISION BEFORE REACHING A DECISION ON IMPORTANT ISSUES. BOARD REQUESTS IMPOSE SOMESTUDENTS OR STAFF LIKELY TO BE AFFECTED BY THE DECISION. >> FACE TO FACE A DAY AND A
WILY CRICKET. >> I THINK WE DO THIS. I THINK IT'S ONE OF THE REASONS WHY THE BOARD HAD REQUESTED THAT OUR TEACHER GROUP COME FORWARD AND BE SCHEDULED ON OUR AGENDAS ON A REGULAR BASIS. I I THINK SOMETHING THE BOARD AT LEAST IN THE PAST HAS VALUED . WE EVEN LIKE TO THINK ABOUT LAST YEAR AT BUDGET TIME.
SHE DID SOME EXCELLENT RESEARCH AND BROUGHT BACK PROPOSED AREAS FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION AND I THINK I SEE THAT CONSISTENTLY. I DON'T SEE A REASON WHY WE SHOULDN'T MEASURE IT.
IT'S GOOD THING TO MEASURE A GREAT TEACHER AND I THINK IT'S GOOD.
>> I THE ONLY MENTAL I THINK IT'S GOOD. >> OKAY.
LEAVE IT. YES, THAT'S GOOD. THAT'S GOOD.
NUMBER 10. BOARD HANDLES ISSUES THAT ARE AMBIGUOUS AND COMPLICATED BY
APPOINTING COMMITTEES TO CONDUCT IN-DEPTH RESEARCH. >> I THINK WE EXCEL IN THIS
AREA. OKAY. >> WHAT DO YOU THINK YOU ARE A PERMANENT PREMIER LEAGUE PLAYER THERE. AS WE SAY.
>> ALL RIGHT. YES. LET'S MOVE TO THE NEXT SECTION THEN I THINK WE'RE DONE WITH THAT SECTION BIG BOARD SHOWS IN WINNERS AND LOSERS THIS
SHOWS AWARENESS OF THE IMPACT IS THIS DECISION WILL HAVE ON THE COMMUNITY.
>> I THINK IT'S A GOOD ONE. WHY CAN'T LEAVE IT THERE? BALL ENCOURAGES THE PUBLIC TO ATTEND BOARD MEETINGS. YES, GOOD ONE TO GET ON KNOW ABOUT SPREAD WHAT? NUMBER TWO OR NUMBER THREE? NUMBER THREE TO REACH OUT TO, RIGHT? CORRECT. YEAH. NO REVIEW BOARD ACTIVELY COOPERATES WITH THE NEWS MEDIA TO SPREAD EM INFORMATION ABOUT SCHOOLS, ABOUT SCHOOLS PROGRAMS . ONCE A MISTAKE THERE AND I'M SAYING IT TURNS OUT THE WAY IT'S WRITTEN I THINK IT'S A GOOD IDEA. YEAH I THOUGHT IT WAS A GOOD
IDEA. >> BUT I DIDN'T LIKE THE WAY IT WAS WRITTEN EITHER.
>> NO, I MEAN IT'S BRADY INSTALLATION IS NOT WHERE YOU RIGHT.
>> RIGHT. >> AS A MAN Y'ALL CAN BE BETTER BETTER WAY OF SAYING IT.
>> ARE WE KEEPING THREE OR ARE WE CHANGING? >> YEAH, WE CAN CHANGE THE WORDING BUT WE ARE KEEPING IT CLOUD. IF WE USE THE EXAMPLE OF OUR FIVE DAY OPENING IN JANUARY, IF THE NEWS MEDIA WERE TO CONTACT US THIS IS ASKING WHETHER WE FREELY SHARE INFORMATION PERTAINING TO SUCH A PROGRAM OR DEVELOPMENT.
>> I MEAN IT'S HARMLESS. YOU MEAN IS IT VALUED? WE.
WE HAVE DISTRICT PERSON WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COMMUNICATING WITH THE MEDIA.
>> THERE'S JUST NOT WRITTEN. >> YEAH I HAVE EDUCATION FORM IN MY MIND.
BUT MAYBE MAYBE IT IS YEAH. >> DO THEY DO THEY WANT IT IS. I WONDER IF THE INTENT OF THIS
[00:35:07]
IS FOR US TO JUST REMAIN AVAILABLE FOR THE NEWS MEDIA FOR ANY QUESTIONING.I DON'T KNOW. I DON'T. I DON'T REALLY KNOW.
WELL I THINK IT MEANS THAT TO ME IS WILL BOTH WAYS IF THE MEDIA QUESTIONS US ON FACE TO FACE WHAT'S HAPPENING FACE TO FACE THEN WE ARE COOPERATING WITH THE INFORMATION SO THAT THEY CAN DISPENSE THE INFORMATION TO THE PUBLIC. WHATEVER THE SCHOOLS ARE DOING ,WE SHOULDN'T HOLD IT HOSTAGE FROM THE FROM THE MEDIA. THAT'S WHAT THAT'S WHAT I'M SAYING. WE AND WE KNOW THAT WE ACTIVELY COOPERATE WITH THEM AS THEY COOPERATE DOESN'T MEAN WE ELICITED. BASICALLY IT MEANS THAT DAY INITIATE CONTACT AND WE ARE COOPERATING. WE'LL GIVE YOU THAT MAYBE THIS WILL GUARANTEE MORE WRONG. I JUST DIDN'T LIKE THE WAY IT WAS WRITTEN WORDS WITH WHY
DIDN'T WE? >> WHY DON'T WE JUST STOP AFTER THE WORD MEDIA BOARD ACTIVELY
COOPERATES WITH THE NEWS MEDIA? YEAH, THAT'S GOOD. >> THAT WORKS FOR ME.
THIS IS A DISPATCH. >> SO ARE WE KEEPING BOARD ACTIVELY COLLABORATES WITH THE
NEWS MEDIA AND IN THE AIR BELIEVE THAT. >> YEAH.
>> YOU CAN LEAVE IT RIGHT. STOP IT THERE, ROBIN. THAT WE NEED ANYTHING ELSE.
>> WILLIAMS HANDS UP WILL SAY I'M FINE. >> I'LL LET YOU GO WITH THAT.
GOOD BOWL HAS FORMED OH COMMITTEE. >> THESE TASK FORCES THAT INCLUDE STAFF AND COMMUNITY REPRESENTATIVES AS WELL AS BOARD MEMBERS THAT'S SOMETHING
WE DO. >> CLOCK THE CLOCK FAMILIAR REFERENDUM COMMITTEE.
>> I WOULD SEPARATE AD HOC COMMITTEE FROM TASK FORCES BECAUSE WHEN OUR COMMITTEE OR MEMBERS VOTE A TASK FORCE WHICH IS INCLUDES THE COMMUNITY MEMBERS ET CETERA YOU WOULD DO
TO SEE ONCE DAY. >> I WOULD SEPARATE BOARD HAS FORMED AD HOC COMMITTEE AND OR ADD AD COMMITTEES WOULD ONLY INCLUDE BOARD MEMBERS BUT TASK FORCES CAN ALSO INCLUDE COMMUNITY MEMBERS WHO EITHER MAY NOT AWARE OF THAT. BUT I THINK WE DO NEED TO SEPARATE THEM. THEY'RE NOT ONE IN THE SAME WILL BE THE BEST COMMITTEE.
YEAH IT'S JUST THE AD HOC COMMITTEE MEMBERS ARE ALL HERE. RACHEL AND GET.
>> BUT DO THE COMMITTEE VOTE? OUR REPRESENTATIVE COMMITTEE IS ONLY 2.
THAT'S A COMMITTEE THAT INCLUDES MORE THAN TWO PEOPLE. UP TO VOTING MEMBERS.
THAT'S YES. SO WHEN THEY BRING A RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD IT HAS TO BE BY THE TWO BOARD MEMBERS. WHO MAKE UP THE AD HOC
COMMITTEE A TASK FORCE. >> YOU KNOW IS A SET OF DEMOS IN THERE.
>> JOE, ARE THEY VOTING? WHAT ARE THEIR MINUTES BY VOTING?
>> I MEAN THEY'RE NOT THERE AT ALL. A COMMITTEE FORMED BY THE
BOARD. >> IF I'M A CITIZEN I CAN'T SERVE ON AN AD HOC COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD THAT I KNOW A TASK FORCE WOULD BE I THINK SIMILAR TO THE COMMITTEE THAT DR. BURKE SET UP FOR THE REFERENDUM PASSAGE AND THAT WAS A BROADER GROUP OF FOLKS AND AS FAR AS I KNOW THERE WERE NO VOTES THAT TOOK PLACE WITH AD HOC COMMITTEES.
WE DO INDEED VOTE AND BRING RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE FULL BOARD AND OBVIOUSLY THAT WAS
[00:40:05]
NOT INCLUDED IN A COMMUNITY MEMBER OR EVEN EVEN A STAFF A DISTRICT STAFF PERSON ON THEONE. >> SO JUST WANT TO CREATE. >> SEPARATE WAY TO YOUR FARM TO LAY DOWN THE GROUND RULES FOR FUTURE NEW BOARD MEMBERS PERHAPS.
>> YES, I UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU SAID. I WOULD AGREE WITH YOU IN TERMS OF WHAT AN AD HOC COMMITTEE IS . YES.
THAT WOULD ADD TO IT. I DON'T THINK THIS IMPLIES A VOTE AND BRING BACK INFORMATION TO THE WHOLE DAY. THIS IMPLIES WHO WHO IS DIRECTING THE DEVELOPMENT OF THOSE THINGS? WOW PLAYERS IT SAYS ON ME READ THIS MAP.
>> IT IMPLIES TO ME THAT THE BOARD HAS FORMED AD HOC COMMITTEES THAT INCLUDE STAFF AND COMMUNITY REPRESENTATIVES AS WELL AS BOARD MEMBERS. WHEN I SEE THAT SLASH IT IF IT MAKES AN AD HOC COMMITTEE ONE IN THE SAME AS A TASK FORCE. SO LET'S JUST REMOVE THE SLASH AND PUT IT HAS FORMED AD HOC COMMITTEES MADE OF CONSISTING OF BOARD MEMBERS AND TASK FORCES THAT INCLUDE COMMUNITY MOVEMENTS AS WELL AS BOARD MEMBERS YOU WANT TO MAKE TO A ROOM I THINK IT WITH TWO DEFINING LISTS OF PARTICIPANTS YOU CAN ASK RIGHT IF YOU WANT
TO DO IT THAT WAY. >> BUT YOU KNOW AS THOUGH AS I RESERVED THE RIGHT TO DISAGREE BUT THAT'S WHAT YOU WANT TO DO IS TELL ME WHAT YOU SEE THAT YOU MAY HAVE BETTER.
>> I'M NOT I ANYTHING EXCEPT THAT YOU'RE DEFINING AD HOC COMMITTEE AS THE AD HOC COMMITTEE THAT THE BOARD HAS LIKE OUR COMMITTEE HERE AND THEY END UP WITH RESULTS COMMITTEE SOLELY ON DEFINING IT AS THAT BLUFFTON AD HOC COMMITTEE WHICH HAS COMMUNITY MEMBERS AND THAT IS AN AD HOC COMMITTEE. IT WON'T LAST.
I HAVE A SCOUT. YOU KNOW IT IS A COMMITTEE IS NOT A TASK FORCE BECAUSE THEY
DON'T HAVE A TASK THE WAY. >> WELL, IF THERE IS SOMETHING ABOUT BARBARA PARTICULAR COMMITTEE THEN THAT NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED IN THE FUTURE BY THE BOARD.
BUT I THINK WE NEED TO MOVE AMBIGUITY WITH OUR COMMITTEE'S FEEDBACK TASK FORCE OR NOT.
>> THE FIRST PART OF WHAT YOU SAID I THINK IF THERE'S ANY AMBIGUITY ABOUT THAT PARTICULAR AD HOC COMMITTEE THEN THAT SHOULD PROBABLY BE ADDRESSED BY THE BOARD IN THE FUTURE.
>> OKAY. BUT GOING FORWARD THERE SHOULD BE NO BLURRING OF THE LINES IN THE AD. IT IS A VERY STRICT COMPOSITE. AND A TASK FORCE.
IT IS A IS SOMETHING OF A DIFFERENT COLOR. AND I THINK WE NEED TO BE CAREFUL ABOUT LUMPING THEM IN WITH THE SAME DESCRIPTION WHICH IS IN THIS CASE INCLUDES STAFF
AND COMMUNITY REPRESENTATIVES WHILE THOSE BOARD MEMBERS. >> ALL RIGHT.
I UNDERSTAND WHERE YOU STAND RIGHT NOW. DO YOU WANT TO MAKE TWO? TRICIA HAS SWORN THAT ONE THAT SAYS JUST THE TASK FORCE AND JUST SAYS THAT FISHER WERNER CAMPBELL MR. HARRIS, WHY WHY NOT JUST TAKE OUT AD HOC AND SAYS THE BOARD WILL FORM A COMMITTEE OF FIVE MEMBERS OF THE COMMUNITY BECAUSE THAT BECAUSE THAT CHANGES THE TOTAL QUESTION AND WHAT MISS RIBAUT WHAT WAS IT WHAT MRS. WEIGL WHAT WAS WHAT WHAT WAS SHE WHAT WAS SHE BASICALLY STATING THAT THERE ARE TWO TYPES AND TYPES OF COMMITTEES THAT COULD BE FORMED HERE AND ONE ONE IS WHAT THE GENERAL PUBLIC AND ONE QUICKLY BOARD MEMBERS AND WE DON'T NEED TO MIX AD HOC COMMITTEES WITH BOARD POPOV OR BOARD MEMBERS ON THE PART BECAUSE THAT'S NOT PERMITTED BECAUSE ONLY WE ARE COMMITTEES ARE PERMITTED UNDER UNDER THE
[00:45:08]
BOARDMAN I'M UNDER CERTAIN INFORMATION IS IT WAS ONLY BOARD MEMBERS VERSUS INVOLVED IN CONVERSION INVOLVING PUBLIC PUBLIC PUBLIC PEOPLE THE PUBLIC SECTOR.>> THAT'S WHY THAT'S WHAT I'M SAYING. >> THAT'S THAT'S THAT'S WHAT HER POSITION IS. BUT THAT'S NOT WHAT I BELIEVE UNLESS I MEAN THAT'S DEBATABLE OR RATHER BOARD JUST PROVIDE ME. OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS.
WE DO THAT. WE ARE ONE OF THEM. BUT CAN THE BOARD DO AN AD HOC COMMITTEE THAT DOES NOT INCLUDE JUST BOARD MEMBERS WHAT THEY CALL NOW NOT CAN I.
>> OK. >> SO THEN THAT IS RIGHT. WE WE NEED ONE.
LET'S TALK ABOUT THAT OUR COMMITTEE AND I WANT TO TALK ABOUT THE TASK FORCE.
EXACTLY. RIGHT. I THINK THAT'S WHAT I WAS SAYING. HE SAID JUST SCALE THIS ONE BACK.
REMOVE AD HOC. JUST END UP READ THE BOARD HAS FORMED TASK FORCE SAYS BANNING STAFF AND COMMUNITY REPRESENTATIVES IMPORT MEMBERS .
>> EARL, I THINK I UNDERSTOOD WHAT YOU WERE SAYING. I THINK THAT'S REASONABLE.
WE CAN DO THAT CHECHESSEE AND UP THIS YEAR I AGREE WITH EARL. >> I THINK THE INTENT BEHIND THIS QUESTION IS ALL ABOUT THE COMMUNITY. WHEN YOU LOOK AT ALL 10 OF THESE QUESTIONS THEY ALL HAVE TO DO WITH HOW YOU ENGAGING WITH THE COMMUNITY.
AND SO I AGREE WITH EARL THAT THAT'S HOW THIS QUESTION SHOULD BE FORMED.
AND THEN AGAIN, IF JOANNE WANTS TO FASHION A QUESTION THAT REALLY DEALS MORE WITH BOARD AD COMMITTEES, WE COULD ADD ONE OF THOSE AS WELL. BUT THE INTENT OF THIS THIS COMMENT WAS REALLY DO YOU INVOLVE THE COMMUNITY? DO YOU INVOLVE STAFF AND MANY REPRESENTATIVES THAT WAS THE INTENT BEHIND. SO I AGREE WITH MR. CAMPBELL.
WHY TO WE AGREED TO. >> I WOULD ADD IN THE ONE WE ALREADY HAVE A POINT POLICY FOR THE CREATION OF AD HOC COMMITTEE. SO WE'RE ALL I NEED TO ASK FOR
A CLARIFICATION. >> SO NUMBER FOUR IS GOING TO SAY BOARD HAS FORMED COMMITTEES
THAT INCLUDE STAFFING REPRESENTATIVES. >> I WOULD AGREE.
ONE TASK FORCE IS ROBBING COMMITTEES IMPLIES BOARD COMMITTEES WHICH HAVE VERY SPECIFIC GUIDELINES. SO I WOULD JUST GET RID OF THE WORDS ADD HOC COMMITTEES AND STICK WITH TASK FORCES INSTEAD. I WOULD AGREE WARD HAS FORMED TASK FORCES THAT INCLUDE STAFF AND COMMUNITY REPRESENTATIVE AS WELL AS BOARD MEMBERS OR LEAVE THAT PART OUT IN MY AREA.
>> NO WE JUST NEED TO MAKE SURE WILLIAM LET'S MOVE ALONG. >> YOU.
>> YES. QUESTION AND DROP TO WILLIAM. >> SO BASICALLY WE WE CHAPTER TWO WILL BE TURNING TO QUESTIONS DIRECT NOW. NO.
IS THIS SCRATCH AD HOC COMMITTEE ALL TOGETHER? NO.
THE COMMITTEE STILL NEEDS IT. IS THERE SOMETHING ABOUT THAT COMMITTEE STILL NEEDS TO BE
ADDRESSED. >> SO DOES THE ADDRESS WHERE WE HAVE A BOARD FORMED COMMITTEES EARLIER CARDS RIGHT. I SUBMIT A NOTE TO MYSELF TO MOVE TO REMEMBER THAT.
BUT I THINK THAT AD HOC COMMITTEE STILL SHOULD DOESN'T RELATE TO COMMUNITY
INVOLVEMENT. >> THAT'S WHY I THINK MOST OF THESE THINGS ARE.
I'LL LEAVE IT THERE. OK. THAT'S WHY I'M GIVING MY ALL FOR HIS COMMITTEES REFERENCE NUMBER FOR OPPORTUNITIES REPORT MEETINGS WHERE OTHERWISE WE'D BE ALL FOR THE TASK FORCE THOUGH THE OPPORTUNITY TO REPORT TO OR MEETINGS WHITEBOARD BOARD MEETINGS I KNEW THAT I WOULD JUST SUBSTITUTE COMMITTEES FOR THE
WORDS TASK FORCES. >> RIGHT. >> RIGHT.
WHAT'S YOUR NEXT CLUB CASE NUMBER SIX BOARD AND ITS MEMBERS MAINTAIN CHANNEL'S COMMUNICATIONS WITH KEY COMMUNITY LEADERS AND THAT'S A GOOD ONE.
>> FINAL JUST THAT WAS NUMBER FIVE. I WILL SAY THAT I'M SURE SUITS
[00:50:18]
. YEAH. YEAH THAT CAN BE KEEP WHAT WE KNOW THAT THAT TO ME A LOT WHEN I COULD COME BACK TO THAT BECAUSE YOU THAT COULD BE MAYBE WITH THIS CONSTITUTE BECAUSE KEY LEADERS SOMETIMES CAN GET YOU KNOW AND ESTIMATE THE BOARD'S TALKING ABOUT NOW THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT SOME GROUPS HOUSE OR PUBLIC FEELS.HOLD ON HOLD ON. LET ME FINISH. WE'RE TALKING ABOUT KEY GROUPS DRIVING DRIVING DECISIONS DISTRICT. SO WE CAN'T WE CAN'T TALK ABOUT KEY GROUPS WHEN IT'S CONVENIENT BECAUSE YOU KNOW, THIS IS SOMETHING THAT ENDED THAT IS IN THAT THERE'S BEEN GUYS BEING EXPRESSED RIGHT NOW AS A BUZZWORDS SPEAK SO KEY LEADERS CAN BE A CORE GROUP OF PEOPLE WHO WANTS TO PUSH THEIR THEY DEAD THEIR AGENDA, THEIR AGENDA AGENDA A LITTLE BABY MASSAGING THEIR AGENDA. SO YOU KNOW, WE HAVE TO BE CAREFUL WHEN WE PROMOTE THIS BECAUSE HE HOW I PERCEIVED THIS IN TERMS I DON'T KNOW IF I WOULD BE INCLINED TO SUPPORT THIS BECAUSE THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WE YOU WOULD DO RIGHT NOW WHERE YOU HEAR WHEN YOU HEAR HOW WE DEFINE A COMMUNITY LEADERS AND COMMUNICATION HERE WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THEY WERE LIKE THIS SERVED THE MAYOR YOU YOU KNOW YOU WERE INVOLVED IN A HURRY CAMP ETC. CETERA TO KEEP COMMUNICATION WITH THOSE PEOPLE KEEP FUNCTIONING.
THOSE ARE COMMUNITY LEADERS BUT NOT WE ADDRESSED THAT EARLIER AND PEOPLE WITH AGENDAS BUT HOW WE RESPOND OUT HERE HOW I WOULD WANT THAT TO BE SPELLED OUT T T WHAT YOU SEE MIGHT BE THE KEY TO THE PUZZLE MAY NOT BE THE KEY TO THE PUZZLE TO ME SO KIKI THEN THESE KIDS ABROAD ARE US AS TO WHETHER TO PUT IT AS A RESULT OF I MEAN THAT'S JUST SAY THAT'S HOW YOU WOULD
INTERPRET THAT. >> I MEAN OUR VIEW IS THE FOURTH SUCH AS THAT WE CAN PUT
SUCH AS REAL GOT MY MESSAGE OUT TO AS WELL GREAT LEADERS. >> I MEAN BECAUSE WE BOTH HAVE ME A MEANINGFUL KIND OF COUNCIL WE DON'T EVEN DO THAT. SO I MEAN LIKE WHAT'S THE WISDOM OF HAVING THIS RECENT POLICIES WHERE YOU SAY YEAH, WE EVALUATED WE'RE SUPPOSED TO DO
IT. >> SO WE WROTE IT DOWN AND WE'LL DO IT.
IT SHOULD BE IN BECAUSE OH YOU'RE DOING YOUR JOB IN NOT DOING IT AS THE QUESTIONER LAUGHTER. WE JUST READ WHAT WE DO WON'T BE FAIL AND FAIL EVALUATION.
>> WE RAISE SOME THINGS WE NEED TO DO THAT WE'RE NOT DOING OUR ALMOST THIS RACKET.
>> BUT I MEAN THAT'S UP TO YOU. I BECAUSE YOU CAN'T YOU CAN'T YOU CAN'T EAT IT.
THAT'S CORRECT. SO THE QUESTION IS THERE YOU MAINTAIN A CHANNEL WITH MAO,
YOU KEEP GOING IN AND OUT. >> WE CAN'T HEAR YOU. WELL, MAYBE BUT MAYBE HE
DOESN'T HAVE HIS HANDS UP. >> HE HAD HIS HANDS UP. MAO, WE COULDN'T HEAR YOU I COULDN'T HEAR YOU THERE FOR A BIT. YOU WERE TALKING BACK THEN AND THAT IS UNSTABLE SOME REASON. BUT WHAT I WAS SAYING WAS DO WE MAINTAIN A CHILD COMMUNICATION WITH CONNIE COUNCIL? YES, WE DO. TO WHAT DEGREE? THAT'S A MATTER OF HOW YOU VOTE. WELL, IF YOU DON'T THINK WE'RE DOING A PROPER THING WITH A CHILD THEN WE VOTE DOWN LOW. IF WE'RE MAINTAINING A PRIVATE CHANNEL WITH THEM WE WOULD ABIDE. BUT THOSE ARE THOSE ARE KEY COMMUNITY LEADERS THAT WE LEAD THE YOU KNOW, SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT DO WE MAINTAIN A
TALENT COMMUNICATION WITH THE OWNERS? >> I MEAN WHEN WE PUT HOW WE PUT WITH THAT WITHOUT WITHOUT ARE WE MAINTAIN WITH THE ELECTED OFFICIALS WELL EXCEPT
SOME OF THEM MAY NOT BE LOCAL OFFICIALS BUT ANYWAY GO AHEAD. >> WILL YOU PUT THAT LANDSLIDE
[00:55:08]
JOE, DON'T DO US THE WORDS LOW KEY COMMUNITY LEADERS PUT IN ELECTED OFFICIALS STEP UP.>> LET'S GIVE KEY LEADERS AND ELECTED OFFICIALS AND BE DONE. >> BOY, ROBIN, YOU GOT THAT.
I DON'T KNOW HOW I KNOW THAT BUSINESS THAT DOESN'T HANDLE WILL'S POINT BUT WARD AND ITS MEMBERS MAINTAIN CHANNELS OF COMMUNICATION WITH ELECTED OFFICIALS AND KEY COMMUNITY
LEADERS. >> YES, JIMMY, IF THE BOARD THINKS A GROUP OF CONSTITUENTS IS LIKELY TO DISAGREE WITH THE ACTION, IT'S CONSIDERING, IT MADE SURE TO LEARN HOW THE
PUBLIC FEELS BEFORE RENDERING THE DECISION. >> I THINK THAT'S A LOT LIKE
NUMBER ONE. >> WE NEED TO DO IT WITH THIS GRADUATE WOULD.
>> YEAH. RIGHT. WELL I'M THINKING TO JOIN WILL RIGHT. EMERY BOARD HAS ADOPTED A POLICY ON PARENT AND PUBLIC RELATIONS INVOLVED WHICH IT WILL REFERENCES AND REVIEWS. WELL WE DO HAVE SOMETHING IN
OUR POLICIES REGARDING OUR PUBLIC RELATIONS FORMS. >> I DON'T KNOW THAT WE REVIEW BUT PERHAPS WE ARE HERE IF ALLOTTED TO THIS EVALUATE SELF-EVALUATION YOU REVIEW IT
WITH THE P E COME BACK. >> I DON'T KNOW IF YOU WANT TO COUNT IT AS THAT BUT COMMUNICATIONS REPORT OUT TO YOU IN THEIR P E S ANNUAL NOW. WHAT WILL YOU REPORT OUT TO US ABOUT? I MISSING THAT REPORT LAST YEAR WAS COMING TO THROUGH OPERATIONS AND THEY SENT IT BACK FOR MORE INFORMATION BUT THEY REPORT OUT HOW THEY COMMUNICATE WITH THE COMMUNITY . AND YOU KNOW THE DIFFERENT
THINGS OF GETTING INFORMATION BUT WE SHOULD KEEP IT. >> YEAH.
I THINK WE SHOULD KEEP IT. I JUST WANT TO KNOW, YOU KNOW, HOW I WOULD RULE ON THIS IF I WANT TO MAKE SURE I'M UNDERSTANDING OUR OPERATIONS IN TERMS OF WHAT THE QUESTION IS
SAY TO CONSTITUENCIES. >> BUT I DON'T KNOW EXACTLY WHICH ONE.
ALL RIGHT. LET'S KEEP IT THAT NUMBER NINE BOARD WITHSTANDS THE PRESS SHARE OF SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS. THERE YOU GO.
WILL. >> SHALL WE KEEP THAT ONE? ENJOY JOINT AND YOUR JOB YOUR
SO NUMBER NINE. >> GOODNESS. I'M GOING TO STAY NEUTRAL ON
NOW WHEN I'M MY. >> WHY? I MEAN WE ZEAL FOR YOUR VOTE.
WE AS USUAL WE KEEP THIS AS A QUESTION. SOMETHING HARDLY WAS RIBAUT NOW YOU WORK MR. WHAT DEMANDS SPECIAL INTEREST GREAT BEAN COUNTING RE ENTRY THAT
SPECIFICALLY FOCUSED ON EDUCATION. >> WE'RE DOWN TO ONE MEASURE THAT I THINK THAT SOME THE REASON FOR HAVING QUESTIONS LIKE IT IS THAT THE BOARD IS
[01:00:06]
GOING TO ELICIT SOME CONVERSATION. >> I THINK THAT'S PART OF THE
IMPORTANCE OF A SELF EVALUATION AS A AS A AS A PROMPTER. >> I LIKE IT AS A AS A DISCUSSION. TRISH I WOULD AGREE WITH THAT. YEAH, IT'S SO.
>> WELL EXAMPLE THE WORD CHECHESSEE WAS THERE. EVERYBODY WHO'S 10 ON THAT TERM YOU HOLD ZERO. THE DISCUSSION NEEDS TO ENSUE. RIGHT.
SO THE LAST BEST THING. YOU KNOW HOW HOW DO WE DEAL OURSELVES?
>> OH, GOD CAN'T KEEP THE THAT'S A GOOD ONE. >> OR IS ACTIVELY INVOLVED IN
STATE AND FEDERAL EDUCATION LEGISLATION. >> GIVE THINK THAT'S GOOD.
OK, LET'S GO ON TO THE LAST LAKE. THIS IS STRATEGIC BOARD DIVORCED MORE TIME TO PUT OUT FIRES THAT HIT THE ROADS TO PREPARING FOR A FUTURE A MR.
CAMPBELL. >> WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS ON THIS?
DO I KEEP THAT WANTED? KEEP THAT WAS. >> YEAH.
OKAY. LAST E-MAIL. >> I'M NOT SURE YOU ARE.
THERE YOU ARE. WE GET YOU TO NOTE BOTH SAYS CLEAR ORGANIZATIONAL PRIORITIES FOR THE YEAR. DO WE HAVE ANY PRIOR QUESTIONNAIRE ITEMS THAT TALK ABOUT SETTING GOALS, POINT SETTING GOALS? IF WE DID THEN THIS WOULD BE
CLEARLY REDUNDANT. >> AND WE'RE 16 SAYS THE BOARD ESTABLISHES GOALS.
>> YEAH. >> SO MY GOALS ARE PRIORITIES. THAT'S GOOD.
NOT A SCRATCH. >> THIS ONLY ON THE POINT THAT IT'S REDUNDANT.
YES. JOANNE, TO THAT POINT THOUGH, DO YOU THINK THAT NUMBER 16 ON OUR REVISED QUESTION SHOULD SAY THE BOARD ESTABLISHES ANNUAL GOALS, OK.
>> AND WE DO. YES. >> THE BOARD ESTABLISHES ANNUAL
AND LOVE AND WHILE YOU'RE ON THAT PAGE NUMBER TWENTY ONE NEEDS TO SAY THE BOARD MEMBERS
ARE KNOWLEDGEABLE BOARD MEMBERS ARE KNOWLEDGEABLE. >> OK.
OK. ALL RIGHT. LET'S GO TO NUMBER THREE.
THEN AT LEAST ONCE A YEAR BORN THE SUPERINTENDENT TO ARTICULATE IS WHERE VISION FOR THE SCHOOL DISTRICT'S FUTURE AND OFFICE STRATEGY IS TO REALIZE THAT VISION.
>> I THINK THAT'S A GOOD ONE POSSIBLY. I AGREE, MR. SMITH.
>> YEAH, I THINK IT'S A GREAT ONE. THAT WHAT THE WHEN THE NEXT ONE TO BOARD DISCUSSED DISCUSSES WHERE THE SCHOOL DISTRICT WILL BE FIVE YEARS FROM NOW.
>> THE GUIDELINE. >> YES. THAT'S THE FIVE YEAR PLAN.
>> NOW WITHIN THE PAST YEAR BOARD HAS REVIEWED SCHOOL DISTRICTS STRATEGIES FOR ATTAINING LONG TERM GOALS THAT THAT'S A GOOD ONE AS WELL TO KEEP.
YES WITH ONE. >> OKAY. >> I HAVE BEEN AT BOARD MEETINGS WHERE DISCUSSIONS FOCUSED ON IDENTIFYING OR OVERCOMING SCHOOL DISTRICT WE
WEAKNESSES BUT WE WORD THAT IS SHOULD WE KEEP IT OR NOT? >> THE IDEA I DO.
[01:05:17]
WELL THERE YOU GO. CHECHESSEE YOU. THANK YOU, JOY.I THINK IT'S A GOOD QUESTION. BUT I REWORDING IT TO BE MORE LIKE THE OTHER ONES.
SOMETHING LIKE BOARD BOARD MEETINGS FOCUS ON DISCUSSIONS OR ABOUT BOARD MEETINGS FOCUS
ON IDENTIFYING OR OVERCOMING SCHOOL DISTRICT WEAKNESSES. >> YES.
THAT INCLUDES THE TWO SCHOOLS, CROWDED SCHOOLS AND ALL THAT STUFF SOMETIMES.
LET ME MAKE SURE I HAVE A BOARD MEETING. MEETINGS FOCUSES ON IDENTIFYING OVERCOMING WEAKNESSES. JUST A SUGGESTION AT THE BOARD MEETINGS FOCUS ON IDENTIFYING OR OVERCOMING SCHOOL DISTRICT WEAKNESSES OR MEETINGS FOCUS ON IDENTIFYING OR OVERCOMING SCHOOL WEAKNESSES. SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL DISTRICT IT'S BASICALLY THE SAME.
>> JUST PUTTING IT IN A DIFFERENT FORMAT WILL HELP CLEAR THE YESSIR BOARD MAKES EXPLICIT USE OF LONG TERM PRIORITIES OF THE SCHOOL DISTRICT DEALING WITH CURRENT ISSUES ABOUT HOW ABOUT THIS? THE BOARD DRAWS ON LONG TERM PRIORITIES AMBULANCE OR PARENT
ISSUES LOOK THAT'S BETTER. >> BOARD DRAWS ON LONG TERM PRIORITIES IN DEALING WITH
SCHOOL DISTRICT ISSUE CURRENT ISSUES AND ISSUES. >> NUMBER EIGHT ALL COMPLAINTS REPORTS ON SCHOOLS PROGRESS WITH THE DISTRICT'S LONG TERM GOALS.
>> HEBER GREATER 9 BOARD HAS A PROCEDURE IN PLACE FOR CONDUCTING SUPERINTENDENT EVALUATE RATIO WARMTH CAME OUT THE RIGHT OF THIS REVIEW BOARD IS PARTICULARLY ADVISED THE AVAILABILITY OF OUTSIDE FUNDS SUCH AS STATE AND FEDERAL GRANTS, SPECIAL PROGRAMS, COMMUNITY RESOURCES, RESEARCH PROGRAMS AND SPECIAL COURTS STAFF ON CONSTRUCTION.
>> THAT'S A PROBLEM. >> YEAH YEAH. I THINK THAT'S WHY WE JUST TALKED ABOUT THE MEETING. RIGHT NOW THE DEAL THERE ARE SOME OTHER QUESTIONS AT THE END
OF THAT. >> THANK YOU. I THINK A LEBRON QUESTIONS THEY'RE KIND OF RELATED BUT NOT RELATED TO WHAT WE'VE DONE ALREADY DIRECTLY.
WHAT'S MORE GENERAL TERMS DO YOU KNOW DID ANYBODY LOOK AT THOSE AND FIGURE ON THOSE?
>> NO, YOU LOOKED AT THEM BUT OPINIONS I ACTUALLY DID NOT LOOK AT THESE BECAUSE I DIDN'T
THINK WAS PART OF OUR THREE DOCUMENTS THAT WE WERE USING. >> SO I SORRY.
I APOLOGIZE. I'M NOT I DON'T HAVE ANY COMMENT ON THEM RIGHT NOW.
>> DE ANYBODY ELSE? >> WELL, I'D LIKE I'D LIKE TO JUST GO THROUGH EACH ITEM THAT WE COULD TO SEE IF THEY'RE REPRESENTED ELSEWHERE IN THE DOCUMENT.
>> THERE PROBABLY ARE THE LIST. LET'S SAY TO THEM ANYWAY. MUCH MORE GENERAL.
YEAH. >> THE FIRST ONE THEIR AGENDA LOOKS LIKE WE ALREADY HAVE THAT IN OUR QUESTIONS. DO WE HAVE ANYTHING THAT SAYS THE MAJORITY OF BOARD MEETING
[01:10:08]
AGENDAS FOCUS ON CORE PURPOSE OR GOALS? >> I THINK I THINK WE ALREADY HAVE SOMETHING IN THERE THAT WE DO. EARLY EARLY ON IS TOP 23.
YES, SO MEETINGS I MEAN ALL THESE DAYS ARE COVERED PRIMARILY.
>> I'LL TELL YOU BEFORE WE EVEN GO TO THE BIG MEETINGS ARE COVERED .
>> I REMEMBER THOSE DISCUSSIONS WE HAD. YOU KNOW, BE MALE BIRTHDAY COMMUNITY MEMBERS MAKE REASONABLE EFFORTS TO INFORM THEMSELVES ABOUT YOUR EDUCATION
TO SCHOOL VISITS ONCE FLYERS BOARD MEMBERS. >> YEAH.
HOW REASONABLE EXPECTATIONS HAVE BEEN FAR THIS IS HOW LIQUID WATCH BELOW COMMUNITY RABIN RULE FROM JUST A COUPLE OF MONTHS CELLULAR I THINK THAT WAS ELSEWHERE.
>> KEEP ROLLING. YEAH. HOW ABOUT THAT?
MAN 1. >> WHICH ONE DID WORK SLASH POLICY POINT TO BALANCE THE
ISSUES A BEER DISTRICT WITH THE NEEDS OF THE ENTIRE DISTRICT. >> DO WE HAVE ANYTHING IN THERE THUS FAR IN THAT? YES AND NO. I MEAN WE GOT THINGS IN THERE THAT RELATE TO YOU KNOW, THAT IS THAT YOUR CONSTITUENCY IS NOT THE TOTAL.
SO WHERE YOU MAKE A DECISION KNOW WHERE IT IS IN THE 10 THERE.
AND I'M GLAD WHEN I GO ON. WELL, YOU KNOW, MY THOUGHTS ABOUT THIS IS MY AND IT'S JUST MY THOUGHT IS THAT THIS IS A ABBREVIATED EVALUATION OF ALL THE THINGS WE HAVE AND THOSE I GUESS EVERY FIVE OR SO 18 QUESTIONS WE HAVE READ ALREADY AND WHAT MY THOUGHT IS TO GIVE
THIS SEPARATE FORM TO SEE WHERE WE WILL VOTE THESE THINGS. >> I MEAN YOU KNOW I MEAN HOW
IT WILL RELATE TO 78 ANSWERS THAT MAKES ANY SENSE. >> WHAT I'M SAYING I'M SAYING THERE IS A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF QUESTIONS ALSO THE SUPERINTENDENT RELATIONSHIP IN THE 7 8 QUESTION MAYBE ABOUT FIVE OR SIX QUESTIONS MOM OR A SUPERINTENDENT RELATIONSHIP AND THEN YOU KNOW, JUST THAT QUESTION JUST THAT STATEMENT THERE ABOUT THE SUPERINTENDENT RELATIONSHIP AND WHAT WOULD WE GET IF WE VOTED ON THAT ONE AS A BOARD JUSTICE THERE? QUESTION 5 BEING THE SAME KIND OF TEST WITH WOULD WE VOTE DOWN FOUR OR FIVE OR ONE OR TWO? AND WHAT WERE THE OTHER SIX QUESTIONS AVERAGE OUT TO BE THIS IS MAKES SURE THAT WHEN YOU'RE FOCUSED ON JUST THE SUPERINTENDENT HOW YOU LOOK AT IT WHEREAS AS OPPOSED TO WHERE YOU FOCUS ON SO MANY QUESTIONS AND A SUPERINTENDENT COMES UP WITH RADICALLY HOW YOU'RE GRADING IT. SO I RAN THAT. THAT WOULD BE THE ONLY WAY I FIGURE YOU COULD USE THIS OTHERWISE YOU KNOW IT'S COVERED ANY COMMENT FROM ANYONE
ELSE? >> I THINK I UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU YOU'RE GOING FOR MAIL.
YOU'RE SAYING IF HAVING SOME MULTIPLE THINGS TO ANSWER IN HERE, YOU'RE REALLY CHECKING THE VALIDITY OF THE ANSWERS AND WHETHER OR NOT THEY ARE THIS RIGHT.
>> ABOUT RIGHT. WE HAVE TO BALANCE THAT AGAINST TEST WEARINESS.
OKAY. I'M ON MY SEVENTY FIFTH QUESTION AND AM I STILL ANSWERING THEM WITH DUE DILIGENCE? SO IF WE LOOK AT NUMBER NINE ON OUR REWRITE WE SAID INPUT FROM THE SUPERINTENDENT SAW IT AS ISSUES WERE DISCUSSED.
[01:15:03]
I MEAN SO I KNOW WHAT YOU'RE SAYING BUT I THINK WE HAVE TO BALANCE THAT WITH HAVING TOO MANY QUESTIONS. OKAY. THAT'S THAT'S THAT'S A FAIR ENOUGH ASSESSMENT. SO WHAT WE'RE DOING IS OUT LOOK AT WHAT WE HAVE.>> I THINK SO I THINK IT WOULD BE HELPFUL TO NOW SEE EVERYTHING THAT WE HAVE IN A DOCUMENT HAVE ALL THE QUESTIONS IN ONE DOCUMENT AND AND I HAD ANOTHER THOUGHT I WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT WHEN WE ASKED THE BOARD FOR EVERYBODY'S IDEA OF WHAT AN EFFICIENTLY BULLETIN BOARD AND EFFICIENT BOARD LOOKS LIKE THAT WE HAVE ADDRESSED ALL OF THOSE STATEMENTS SOMEWHERE
WITHIN OUR QUESTIONS ONE TO ONE . >> WHEN YOU SAID TRUST LATENESS ,ARE WE GOING TO BREAK DOWN THOSE DEEP ASSENT TO CERTAIN AMOUNT OF ELEMENTS WHILE THE
ONE THAT COMES TO MIND VERY QUICKLY? >> I THINK MR. SMITH PUT ONE IN ABOUT USING DATA, OK? AND SO I WOULD WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WHEN WE GO THROUGH THIS ENTIRE DOCUMENT THAT WE WE DO HAVE THE IMPORT OF USING DATA.
SO SOMETHING ALONG THOSE LINES . ANOTHER ONE THAT COMES TO MIND
MIGHT MEAN THAT WE'LL NEED TO PHASE. >> WELL, WELL LESS USUALLY
BELOW FINANCE. >> I DON'T CALL A WHOLE LOT OF THINGS ABOUT FINANCE AND OUR SO I 10 USE WE COULD USE THOSE THINGS THAT ALL THE BOARD MEMBERS SEND IN AS KIND OF A BELLWETHER TO US TO DETERMINE WHETHER WE HAD TO HIT ALL THE IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF EVALUATING
OURSELVES. >> SO TO YOUR POINT THERE. MR. CAMPBELL YEAH.
YEAH. WE SHOULD GO THROUGH WITH WITH THE IDEA OF OK, HOW MANY
OF THESE EVEN TALK ABOUT FINANCE. >> ALL RIGHT.
IN FORMATTING FOR YOU DO I DO YOU NEED ME TO KEEP THE SAME PAGES ON THERE SO YOU CAN GO BACK AND REFERENCE OR JUST MAKE THIS ONE DOCUMENT ONE THROUGH 70 BECAUSE THERE ARE THINGS THAT WE TOOK OUT THINGS WE KEEP. SO ALL THE THINGS THAT WE KEEP I WILL TYPE THEM OUT AS CAP AND THEY WOULD BE NUMBERED ONE THROUGH HAVE HOWEVER QUESTIONS THAT WE HAVE. IT'S 1 2 7 0 BY NO. CAN YOU DO BOTH AND DO BOTH
LIKE THAT? >> I MEAN YOU KNOW ON THE SIDE SOMEWHERE PUT PAGE ONE BUT GO KNOW CONTINUALLY DO THE NUMBERS 1 2 7 8 BUT AT NUMBER NINE FOR EXAMPLE YOU GO ON THE SIDE AND PUT THESE TWO SLASH THREE. SO IN CASE WE DO HAVE TO FIND IT WE CAN FIND IT CAN MAKE
SENSE. >> WELL LET LET ME TRY. >> SO IF YOU'RE LOOKING AT THE DOCUMENT SO THESE QUESTIONS CAME FROM PAGE 1. YES.
THEY THERE WERE SOME THAT ARE DELETED SO RANDOM ONES THAT WERE DELETED.
OK. LET'S REMEMBER ONE THROUGH NINE.
>> YEAH. AND THOSE QUESTIONS CAME FROM PAGE 2 AND 3.
>> YEAH. AND JUST CONTINUE THOSE NUMBERING YOU KNOW 2 AND 3.
SO THAT START RIGHT NOW WENT DOWN MY MISCOUNTED SO. SO WE HAD TWENTY THREE SELF FROM PAGE 2 AND 3 WE GOT FROM PAGE 2 AND 3 WE ENDED UP WITH TWENTY THREE QUESTIONS THE COMBINATION ON PAGES 2 AND 3 WHEN WE GOT INTO THE OTHER DOCUMENT WE HAD THIRTY THREE QUESTIONS THIRTY TWO QUESTIONS RIGHT HERE STOP AT TWENTY THREE YEAH THAT'S ABSOLUTELY NO THIRTY TWO IF YOU'RE GOING ONE THROUGH IF YOU GO ONE THROUGH THE WHOLE CORRECT CORRECT.
>> ALL RIGHT. >> SO YOU SAID WE GOT SEVEN ALTOGETHER ABOUT THAT.
I THINK WE HAVE ABOUT 70 ALL TOGETHER. >> OK.
WELL I LIKE TO SEE ALL SIMILARLY OF THOSE FOR SURE LISTED FROM ONE TO 70.
>> OK. I'LL YES I'LL LIST ALL THE QUESTIONS THAT WE WE HAVE NO MR
[01:20:03]
CAMPBELL. >> YES MA'AM. WHEN WE LOOK AT PAGES 3 AND 4 ON OUR WHEN WE RE NUMBERED ALL THE DOCUMENTS AS JOANNE HAD SUGGESTED ON PAGE THREE AND FOUR THERE ARE SOME QUESTIONS THAT WOULD GIVE BOARD MEMBERS AN OPPORTUNITY TO WRITE IN SOME THOUGHTS. I WONDERING IF WE SHOULD GO THROUGH THOSE BECAUSE I THINK THAT WOULD BE IMPORTANT TO GIVE BOARD MEMBERS A CHANCE TO NOT JUST ANSWER ON A SCALE BUT TO ADD A NARRATIVE GAY AND RIGHT WE ALL DO AT THE END OF THE YES I WOULD SAY THE VALUATION I
AGREE. >> AND AT THAT I DO HAVE TWO CONCERNS.
>> ALL RIGHT. >> DRESS THAT WAY TO DO THAT. AND THEN NOW WILL WAS THERE ARE TWO CONCERNS. ONE YOU MENTIONED THAT WE DON'T HAVE ENOUGH FINANCIAL OR FINANCIAL QUESTIONS IN HERE BECAUSE I ANSWER. ACCOUNTABILITY IS ONE IT'S ONE OF OUR MAIN JOB AS BOARD MEMBERS AND AS WELL AS IT WAS ABOUT FINANCE AND AS WELL AS I LOST I LOST MY THOUGHT FOR A SECOND SKIN BUT WE WANT IS FINANCIAL NEVERTHELESS WHAT THIS MORE OFFICERS ABOUT BOARD LEADERSHIP THERE IS NOT ENOUGH QUESTIONS IN HERE ABOUT BOARD LEADERSHIP. I FIND THAT'S WHERE WE WANT TO LOOK AT.
BE. WE'RE GOING TO LOOK AND THOSE TWO THINGS THAT WAS DISCUSSED I GUESS YOU'LL BE TALKING ABOUT WHAT YOU SAID WAS THE TOO EFFICIENT BOARD WAS AN EFFICIENT ONE EFFICIENT BOARD LOOKS LIKE. BUT WHATEVER IT IS WE USED WHATEVER THOSE DEFINITIONS WERE SUBMITTED WE GOT A LOOK AT THAT THAT THERE WAS AND THERE WERE OFFICERS NOW AND THAT'S HOW IMPORTANT IT WAS TO THE BOARD MEMBERS.
BUT WE WILL LOOK AT ALL SEVEN LEVEL QUESTIONS AND DON'T AND KIND OF PUT A LITTLE NOTATION BESIDES THE INTEREST THAT LEVEL OF EACH ONE AND MR. FIX HER HAND UP.
>> MR. SMITH, I THINK TO YOUR POINT THOUGH AFTER WE GO THROUGH THAT PROCESS THAT MR. CAMPBELL JUST MENTIONED TO YOUR POINT IF WE INCLUDED THE QUESTIONS LIKE THE QUESTION ON NUMBER FOUR ON PAGE FOUR. SO WHAT DO YOU CONSIDER THREE WEAKNESSES OF THE BOARD? I MEAN THERE IS GOING TO BE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR PEOPLE TO EXPOUND UPON ANY CONCERNS THEY MIGHT HAVE. I THINK THAT I MEAN I HEAR WHAT YOU'RE SAYING BUT BOY, LEADERSHIP SHOULD NOT BE SOMETHING SAPPY. SUPPLEMENT YOUR CALL WITH WRITING THAT DOWN VERSUS ACTUALLY IT WAS ON A JUST GO AND SCORE IT AND IT WAS ON IT AND THEN IT'S A COMMON SCORE THEN IT'S SOMETHING THAT NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED VERSUS SOMEBODY WERE MADE AND MAYBE MEN MAY SAY WELL YOU KNOW WHAT? YOU KNOW I DON'T WANT OR OUR ROCK TEBOW I DON'T WANT TO JUST MAKE OUT MAKE IT OUT PERSON THAT JUST DID IT AND YOU JUST MADE ABOUT ABOUT A MADE ABOUT ME AND MY FEELINGS. SO WHAT IF IT IS A COMMON THREAD? IT'S EASY TO BE SEEN IF THERE WAS ACTUAL IN THE FORM OF A QUESTION I DON'T DISAGREE WITH YOU MR. SMITH. I WAS JUST SAYING THAT IN ADDITION TO THAT. SO I DON'T DISAGREE THAT WE SHOULD GO THROUGH THIS ENTIRE DOCUMENT AND MAKE SURE THAT IT IS A COMPREHENSIVE DOCUMENT RELATIVE TO BOARD.
>> WALID SHIP WHICH YOU KNOW RIGHT WHERE WE HAVE GOT THREE PEOPLE ON BOARD LEADERSHIP ONLY SO YOU KNOW A PARLIAMENTARIAN. ALL RIGHT. NOT YET.
OKAY. SO I MEAN I'M SURE YOU'VE GOT QUESTIONS, JOANNE.
SO THIS IS A PROCESS QUITE SURE. >> MAYBE SOME SLIGHTLY OFF TOPIC HERE. I'M NOT TALKING ABOUT THE OPPORTUNITIES FOR BOARD MEMBERS TO RESPOND TO THE OPEN ENDED QUESTIONS IF YOU. BUT ARE WE GOING TO INCLUDE WHEN WE BRING THIS FORWARD TO THE BOARD FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL THIS INSTRUMENT? ARE WE ALSO GOING INCLUDE USE YOUR MANUAL THAT IS TO SAY HOW THEY SHOULD PLAY OUT.
NOW WE ALREADY KNOW IT HAPPENS ONCE A YEAR BECAUSE THAT'S IMPORT POLICY.
BUT ARE WE GOING TO ALSO RECOMMEND TO THE BOARD THAT THIS OBVIOUSLY WE CAN'T DISCUSS IT IN EXECUTIVE SESSION. IT'S NOT ONE OF THE REASONS TO GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION ALLOWABLE BY LAW. BUT WOULD WE HAVE A DEDICATED BOARD MEETING TO PRESENT THIS AND ALLOW FOR DISCUSSION FOR THE PUBLIC TO SEE AND HEAR ARE WE JUST EXCHANGING THESE
[01:25:05]
DOCUMENTS OR COMPILING THEM PERHAPS BY THE OFFICER AND THEN JUST GIVING UP A COPY TO BOARD MEMBERS AND THE PUBLIC? HOW ARE WE GOING TO WEIGH IN AS A COMMITTEE ON THAT? I MEAN I DON'T QUITE UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU'RE SAYING. BUT YOU'RE SAYING ARE WE GOING TO SUGGEST HOW THIS ISSUE SHOULD BE USED VETTED ALL THE WAY THROUGH OR NOT?AS LONG AS YOU SAY FLORENCE THAT'S WHAT I'M SAYING NOW. >> WE LOST OUR CHECHESSEE JOEY
. >> AND I THINK THAT THAT'S A REALLY GOOD POINT THAT YOU'RE MAKING AND I THINK THAT WE AS A COMMITTEE SINCE WE'RE THE MOST FAMILIAR WITH THIS REALLY OUGHT TO TALK ABOUT THE PROCESS. HOW WOULD USED AND MAKE SOME RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE BOARD THE FULL BOARD AS TO EXACTLY THOSE POINTS YOU JUST MADE? YOU KNOW THE DATA MIGHT BE COMPILED AND THEN A SPECIAL CALLED MEETING AND PUBLIC SESSION TO DISCUSS THE RESULTS AND HAVE CONVERSATION AGAIN. BUT I THINK WE SHOULD AS A COMMITTEE DEFINITELY PUT FORTH
OUR RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THAT. ALL RIGHT. >> I AGREE WITH THAT.
THAT'S RIGHT. SO WE ARE GOING TO ADD THESE MANY QUESTIONS.
WE GOT THE BAND THE NINE I THINK YOU MEAN THE NARRATIVE ONES, MEL?
>> YES, THE NARRATIVE ONCE THERE ARE ACTUALLY THREE THREE AND THREE.
>> RIGHT? WELL WELL IT'S THREE QUESTIONS AND I THINK THAT IT EACH ONE SAYS THE THREE MOST IMPORTANT. OK. OK.
OK. YES. SO THERE ARE THREE QUESTIONS.
>> ALL RIGHT. THREE QUESTIONS BUT WITH THREE SECTIONS TO THREE EXAMPLES.
WE'LL ADD THOSE AND HOW. NOW HERE'S THE QUESTION THAT WE THINK ABOUT TO WHILE WE'RE THINKING ABOUT THE OTHER THING ARE WE GOING TO INCLUDE THAT IN THE EVALUATION JUST A SUMMARY
OF INFORMATION WHEN WE DO THE RESULTS. >> SO IF WE LET'S SAY WE ARE TASKED WITH GRADING THIS THING, I HOPE NOT. BUT LET'S SAY WE HOW WE AGREE ON THOSE THOSE OPEN ENDED QUESTIONS. SO IT'S A MATTER OF THE WAY I SEE THIS IS THAT WE PROBABLY WOULD HAVE A SPREADSHEET, YOU KNOW, PUT TOGETHER MUCH LIKE YOU KNOW, WE'VE USED IN THE PAST AND SO EVERYBODY'S EVERYBODY'S NUMERICAL RATING FOR THE FIRST 70 QUESTIONS ARE INCLUDED. AND THEN YOU KNOW, YOU'D FIND THE AVERAGE AND SO ON. AND THEN I WOULD SAY THAT WHOEVER IS TASKED WITH PUTTING THIS TOGETHER MIGHT SEE SOME COMMONALITIES EARTH OR THREADS FOR THE NARRATIVE PART.
BUT I I ADVOCATE FOR EVERY SINGLE NARRATIVE TO BE INCLUDED IN THE FINAL REPORT IN THE BOARD MEMBERS OWN WORDS NOT TRYING TO SUMMARIZE OR PARAPHRASE THEM BUT VERBATIM EVERYBODY'S NARRATIVE. I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT THAT EVERYBODY SEE EVERYTHING THAT
THE EVERY BOARD MEMBER HAS WRITTEN. >> SO I HAVE A SUGGESTION.
TRICIA I THINK YOU'RE SPOT ON. I THINK THIS FARM NEEDS TO BE ELECTRONIC THEM AND FILL THAT ELECTRONICALLY SO WE CAN CUT AND PASTE NO PAPERS BECAUSE IT WILL MAKE THAT COMPILATION ALL
THAT MUCH EASIER I WOULD IMAGINE. >> YEAH.
YEAH THAT'S VERY GOOD POINT. IF IT'S ELECTRONIC IT WOULD BE DIFFICULT TO CUT WHEN YOU'RE.
WELL LET ME CLARIFY WHAT IS ELECTRONIC MEAN. THAT THEY SUBMIT IT BY EMAIL YOU DO YOUR WORD YOU AND PUT IT IN EMAIL AND THEN BECOMES ONE SUMMARY PAGE OR YOU CAN DO WELL
YOU COULD SEND A FORM. >> IT COULD BE A FORM CHRONIC FORM.
IT COULD COME VIA E-MAIL. IT'S AN ELECTRONIC FORM. >> YOU CAN'T CUT AND PASTE.
YOU CAN SEND IT OUT BY EMAIL AND THEN YOU CAN FILL UP DO YOUR DOCUMENT AND THEN WE CAN ATTACH IF IT'S IN A WORD DOCUMENT WE CAN PUT IT ALL TOGETHER WHEN YOU'RE WHEN YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT THE SUMMARY PAGE OF EVERYONE ANSWERING THE QUESTIONS, IS
THAT WHAT YOU MEAN? >> NOW YOU COULD DO A CHANEY THEN YEAH YOU CAN DO THE SPREADSHEET WHAT YOU KNOW WHAT THE RANKING AND THEN WHAT TRICIA SAID THEN THAT WOULD JUST BE ONE DOCUMENT OF EVERYONE'S QUESTIONS OR THEIR THEIR COMMENTS OR EACH
[01:30:06]
DOCUMENT. >> WELL, IF YOU JUST A SUGGESTION.
YOU GAVE EVERY BOARD MEMBER A SPREADSHEET WITH THESE QUESTIONS TO FILL OUT AND POINT THE FIELDS WHERE WE'RE CALCULATING WE CAN AVERAGE IT. AND THAT WOULD STREAMLINE THAT PROCESS. SO WE DON'T HAVE TO MANUALLY ADD TO IT.
WE HAVE SOME YOU KNOW OR WHAT HAVE YOU FORMULA. YOU ALSO HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO ENTER AREA'S TEXT THAT YOU COULD COPY INTO ONE MASTER DOCUMENT FOR THE COMPILATION.
IT CAN BE DONE. I KNOW WE WOULD HAVE THE ABILITY I'M JUST TRYING TO THINK OF WHAT WOULD MAKE IT EASY. AS FOR WHO'S EVER LEFT IN CHARGE TO PUT ALL THIS TOGETHER LIKELY THE OFFICERS. BUT IT COULD ALSO BE THE AT THE AD HOC COMMITTEE MARRIED TRICIA AND WILL ALL THREE OF YOU ARE GONNA BE HERE STILL AROUND THE
DAY, RIGHT? >> EASILY REFERRED TO IS A TECHNOLOGY OR DANIEL SITTING
UNIT. >> WHAT YOU'RE SUGGESTING IN THE SPREADSHEET IS E WE'RE ALL JUST THAT WHAT WORKED WHAT YOU JUST SUGGESTED PUTTING IT IN A SPREADSHEET.
>> YEAH. ALL RIGHT, MARK WITH WITH THE CANDLES BEGAN THE TEXT AS YOU ARE POINTING OUT THIS IS DONE IS DONE NORMALLY TABLET OFFICES NORMALLY TABLETS BECAUSE I THEIR OFFICE OF RIBAUT TWO NOW I REMEMBER I TELL YOU WITHOUT ANY EVALUATIONS SO ALL OF HIS
COULD INCLUDE THE ENTIRE WAY INTO TABLET. >> EVALUATIONS.
>> SO YOU SAID THE TASK WILL IS JUST BE TRICIA AND ISO. NO I'M JUST SAYING I UNDERSTAND THAT SHE SAID SHE SAID OH MAYBE YOU COULD BE CHATTING ABOUT OFFICES.
NOW IT'S WHEN I LEARNED THAT ALL ALL TABULATIONS DON'T COME FROM OFFICES JUST THAT HIS CHAIR IS BEEN THE CHAIR AND THE CHAIR OF THE COMMITTEE 10 MINUTES IS ANALYZE WHAT WE NEED DONE THIS ROBIN AND PUT IT IN TERMS OF HOW WE GET IT DONE AND THEN FIND SOME WAY TO GET IT
DONE THIS WEEK. >> WHEN THE DISTRICT STAFF I MEAN HOW HOW SKILLED ARE YOU WITH SETTING UP SPREADSHEETS OR MOLLY I MEAN YOU COULD START AS EARLY AS WHEN TYPING UP THESE 70 SOMETHING QUESTIONS, GETTING IT INTO A SPREADSHEET RIGHT OFF THE BAT.
>> CORRECT? I WOULD SET US UP FOR SUCCESS LATER ON DOWN THE ROAD.
ARE YOU ALL UP FOR SUCCESS? I'M AT THE READY MARK. LET'S JUST GO BACK FOR A
SECOND. IF YOU DO A LITTLE TO USE. >> I THINK THAT MAYBE THERE IS SOMETHING IN GOOGLE DOCUMENTS THAT WOULD ALLOW US TO DO THIS AND THEN EVERYONE WOULD GET A CENTRELINK AND A GOOGLE DOC. ROBIN, IS THAT WHAT YOU'RE THINKING? I WAS THINKING WHAT JILLIAN SUGGESTED. WE CAN PUT IT IN A SPREADSHEET AND YOU CAN JUST PUT IT IN THERE. PUTTING IN THE SPREAD IS EVERYONE PARTICULARLY. BOARD MEMBERS HAVE YOU'RE NOT AS FAMILIAR WITH GOOGLE DOCS IS MORE SO THOSE OF YOU THAT WORKED IN THE SCHOOLS. SO PUTTING IT IN A SPREADSHEET WOULD BE EASIER. ALL RIGHT. MR. MR. CAMPBELL, WE'RE NOT TRYING TO EXPEDITE THIS THAT THE CURRENT BOARD MEMBERS COULD
PROVIDE THEIR INPUT. >> I WAS TRYING TO AND WE HAVE ANOTHER MEETING SET UP WHEN YOU
WILL HAVE TO DECIDE YOU DECIDED . >> LET ME BE VERY IMPORTANT TO
GET THE CURRENT BOARD MEMBERS INPUT ON THIS. >> NO DOUBT YOU HAVE A MEDIA
SCHEDULE FOR THE DECEMBER 8TH MEETING. >> WELL, THIS IS WHEN I AT ME
AND I WILL RETURN TO SAM TO SHARE. >> BOB, WE'RE LOOKING YOU MAY BRING THE BOARD TO DRAG. HAD THEM WELL AGAIN AND GO BACK ONE LAST TIME AS A COMMITTEE.
IS THAT WHAT YOU MEAN? I'M SORRY. DON'T SAY THAT AGAIN.
I WAS LOOKING AT THE CALENDAR YEAR CAM SIDE INTERRUPT YOU. SO YOU'RE SAYING THAT BRING THE FULL BOARD A DRAFT AND THEN HAVE THEM GIVE US THEIR INPUT AND COME BACK ONE MORE TIME TO COMMITTEE TO INCORPORATE THEIR INPUT OR WHAT DO YOU THINK? WHAT WERE YOU.
>> WELL, I JUST I'LL DEFER TO MR. CAMPBELL BUT I THOUGHT I HAD INFERRED FROM MR.
[01:35:01]
CAMPBELL'S COMMENT. REMEMBER WHEN IT WAS BUT THAT HE WAS REALLY HOPING TO GET THIS. SO THAT YEAR AND JOHN'S INPUT, YOU KNOW WHAT WOULD BE COUNTED BECAUSE YOU MEAN ACTUALLY COMPLETING THE THE ANNUAL EVALUATION?>> I WAS. THAT'S RIGHT. THAT'S WHAT I WAS THERE WAS A VISION NAME BEFORE RIGHT LEAVE. AND WE PROBABLY WON'T BE ABLE TO DO IT.
BUT THE ONE MEETING WE HAVING IS WHAT IS RIGHT. WHAT ABOUT THE MEETING OUR NEXT MEET OUR BOARD MEETING IS DECEMBER 8TH. WHY DO YOU HAVE THE WEEK PRIOR TO THERE THAT YOU CAN MEET? THERE IS NOW THE THERE IS AGENDA SETTING ON THE 30TH AT 4:00. WE NOW HAVE THE POLICY COMMITTEE MAKE POLICY COMMITTEE
MEETING MEETING ON DECEMBER. WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 2ND. >> I THINK WE SAID WHAT WHAT WAS THAT WE YEAH WE ALREADY SET IT UP MONDAY. ROBIN, I DON'T KNOW IT WAS THE
30TH AT ELEVEN O'CLOCK. >> IT WAS EARLY YET. THEN THERE WAS A MEETING.
RIGHT. IT WAS EITHER THE 30TH OR THE FIRST AT ELEVEN O'CLOCK
SOMEBODY HAD A PROBLEM ON THE 30TH. >> THERE WAS JOHANNA I THINK IT WAS WILLIAM OR SOMEBODY ON THE 30TH AND WE MOVED IT TO THE TWENTY NINTH.
>> I THOUGHT THAT THE TWENTY NINTH IN THE SUN SO IT WAS ABOUT A YEAR.
>> YEAH WE MOVED THE THIRD THIRTIETH AS THE MONDAY AFTER THANKSGIVING I DON'T.
>> I DID NOT WRITE ANYTHING DOWN BUT I'M AVAILABLE THAT DAY.
I AM NOVEMBER. YES. ALL RIGHT.
>> LET'S GO WITH THAT. IS WILLIAM AVAILABLE? YEAH.
>> THAT'S RIGHT. WE SAID 11:00 SAME TIME. >> SOUNDS GOOD.
OKAY. >> I'LL GO SEE ALL THOSE ARE ALSO BELIEVED TO HAVE A SPECIAL CARD MEETING TO GET THIS DONE WITH ALL COMMITTEES. I'M SURE THAT WE WE SHOULD BE GLAD DECEMBER BEFORE EVERYONE LEAVES. THAT'S THAT'S ALWAYS WORTHWHILE. I THINK THEY'LL BE WORTH WHILE TO YOU CAN DRIVE THAT WILL ON THE AGENDA SETTING MEETING THAT SPECIAL CALL MEETING. I THINK IT WILL BE WORTHWHILE BECAUSE IT GAVE US A REAL LOOK AT WHERE WE ARE. ALL RIGHT.
I AM I REMEMBER WE GOT THE HOLIDAYS COMING. >> EXACTLY.
SO WHILE WE BE OUT AGAIN, THERE IS AMPLE TIME TO REVIEW OUR FINISHED PRODUCT.
FIRST WE HAVE TO ADOPT IT AS BOARD FIRST. THAT WOULD MEAN IT WOULD HAVE TO BE ADOPTED ON DECEMBER A LINE. WELL, CAN I.
CAN I SUGGEST THAT? WHY CAN'T WE DO TWO THINGS AT OUR SPECIAL CALLED MEETING ON DECEMBER 2ND? MAYBE. COULD WE NOT I GUESS DEPENDS ON
HOW MUCH DISCUSSION WOULD HAPPEN BUT. >> OKAY.
YOU MEAN ADOPT THE INSTRUMENT AS A SEPARATE AGENDA ITEM? RIGHT.
ASK THE OFFICERS IF THEY'LL INCLUDE THAT. THAT'S A GOOD IDEA.
WHEN IS THAT MEETING? I MEAN I GUESS THE AGENDA YOU WON'T HAVE AN AGENDA SETTING FOR THAT. BECAUSE WE SAID IT WAS JUST GOING TO BE FOR POLICY READING.
BUT WE. BUT WE HAD PLENTY OF TIME TO ADD IT TO AN AGENDA.
>> SO JUST WITH WILLIAM AND KATHY TO MAKE SURE YOU CAN ADD THAT ON THE AGENDA THUS FAR.
>> THAT'S THAT'S DECEMBER 2ND. >> AND YOU GUYS THAT'S A GOOD IDEA.
>> OR IS IT THE BUT IT IS REALLY. WELL WE HAVE TO ACCOMPLISH.
>> THE ACTUAL EVALUATION FOR YOU TO DO THE ACTUAL EVALUATION WE HAVE TO HAVE THAT USER'S MANUAL WITH IT. NOT A WORD. THE PROCESS KIND OF FOLLOW.
I THINK WE HAVE TO GET THAT IRONED OUT AND INCLUDE THAT WITH THE THAT YOU'RE TALKING
ALONG THE EAST. >> JOANNA, EACH OF YOU ON A SECOND WELL YOU WERE NEEDED ON THE SECOND IF YOU'RE GOING TO DO THE EVALUATION THE WEEK OF THE 8TH.
>> WELL, DO WE HAVE TO DO THE EVALUATION LEGALLY? NO.
BUT THEN THAT WE DO NEXT WEEK. YOU'RE GETTING INTO THE S AS JOANNE SAYS OPTIONS ON YOUR ON THE FOLLOWING WEEK THE WEEK OF THE 14TH IS YOUR LAST WEEK BEFORE YOU BREAK FOR THE
HOLIDAYS. >> WELL, THAT MR. HAVE TO BE THE WEEK BEFORE WE BREAK.
[01:40:01]
WE CAN EXTEND IT HAS A BOARD AND WE SEE THAT THAT THIS IS SOMETHING THAT WE WANT TO DO.THIS CAN BE OUR LASTING TO DO AS A BOARD. I MEAN GOOGLE WAS CHRISTMAS DAY IF AND IF IT DISAPPOINTED DID NOT WORK IN THE WAKE OF CHRISTMAS I I CAN HEAR YOU.
>> I'M ASKING. I WELL WHAT'S A BIT OF CHRISTMAS?
>> CHRISTMAS IS DECEMBER 25TH. >> RIGHT. OKAY SO IF RIBAUT MEANS TO A THERE'S STILL PLENTY OF TIME LEFT IN THAT THING STILL CAN BE DONE.
WE DON'T HAVE TO STOP WORKING BECAUSE THE OUR LAST OFFICIAL BUSINESS MEETING IS ON THE 8TH.
WE STILL HAVE PLENTY OF TIME TO TELL YOU ONE LAST OFFICIAL MEETING AS IS THE 19TH.
>> SO IT'S NOT WORKING GOING AFTER THE 90 STAFF DON'T HAVE TO BE WORKING FOR THIS FOR THIS
RIGHT HERE. >> WELL, THIS IS THIS IS A BOARD THAT IS STRICTLY ABOVE BOARD DRIVEN WON'T BE WORKING AFTER THE WEEK OF THE 19TH EITHER TICKET AND I MAKE A RECOMMENDATION IF WE'RE MEETING ON THE 30TH AS OUR EVALUATION COMMITTEE IS MEETING THE 30TH AND IF WE CAN DECIDE THAT THE INSTRUMENT IS READY TO GO TO BE BROUGHT TO THE KIND OF CHANGE THINGS WILL BUT HERE TO BE BROUGHT TO THE BOARD MEETING ON THE 8TH.
>> OK. WERE THERE FOR THE FULL BOARD APPROVAL RIGHT THEN THE FULL BOARD WORKS ON THE INSTRUMENT AND TURNED IT IN BY THE BY THE ELEVENTH SO WE COULD HAVE A SPECIAL CALLED MEETING ON THE 15TH DECEMBER 15 TERRY OR ONLY THE DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS OF THE SELF EVALUATE AND I THINK THAT WOULD BE A GOOD WAY TO END THE YEAR.
>> YEAH WELL THAT'S A MADE NO. AS THIS GUY. YEAH.
SO YEAH. SO IT'S GONNA BE AN OPEN BOARD MEETING AND I ANYMORE SURROUNDING SUPPORT SYSTEMS USUALLY REQUIRED FOR AN OPEN MEETING.
>> HAVE TO BE IN PLACE THAT MEANS HAVE A STAFF INVOLVEMENT AND A RECORDING.
YOU KNOW WHAT THEY WILL BE WORKING THAT WEEK AS IT IS. >> THAT WOULD THAT'S GOOD THEN.
BUT WE HAVE TO GET OUR PROCESS DONE I THINK ALONG YEAH. IF WE'RE GOING TO GET THAT EVERYTHING DONE BY THE SECOND HALF REALITY OR TRICIA SAND WE COULD APPROVE IT ON THE END.
>> YEAH IT'S APPROVED EARLY BUT WE GOT TO HAVE IT READY FOR BOARD APPROVAL ON THESE LIKE
STILL. >> SO IF WE COME TO OUR NEXT MEETING ON THE 30TH HAVING REVIEWED THE ENTIRE DOCUMENT THAT ROB AND WE'LL HAVE IN BOARD DOCS FOR US AND WE WE
HAVE IN OUR MINDS A PROCESS BY WHICH TO GET THIS FINISHED. >> OK.
SO ALL THAT HAPPENS ON THE 30TH THEN WE CAN BRING IT TO THE BOARD ON THE 8TH FOR APPROVAL.
>> YOU KNOW, WE WENT BACK TO THE BOARDROOM THE SET. >> WELL, I REVISED IT ONLY THINKING THAT WE'VE GOT SO MUCH WORK TO DO ON THAT POLICY THAT WE DON'T LAUDED OURSELVES.
>> THE REAL READY FOR BOARD ACTION AFTER THE 30TH THAT IS YOU SAY RIGHT.
>> SO BOARD ACTION ON THE 8TH AND THEN PEOPLE TAKE IT HOME AND AND HAVE A COUPLE OF DAYS
TO WORK ON IT THROUGH THE WEEKEND. >> AND IT COULD BE COMPILE ON THE 14TH FOR A SPECIAL CALLED BOARD MEETING ON THE 15TH OR EVEN THE 17TH DAY.
>> SOUNDS GOOD. WELL IF IT'S ELECTRON AND THE COMPILATION SHOULD BE PRETTY
SO MAYBE WE NAIL ALL THIS DOWN AFTER WE HAVE A TIME TO PROCESS AND THINK ABOUT IT UP FOR OUR MEETING ON THE 30TH AND THEN WE JUST FLY WITH IT WITH THE INTENT TO GET IT ALL DONE.
AND YOU HAVE A SPECIAL CALLED OPEN SESSION THE WEEK OF THE 14TH.
SOME DAY IN THEIR IN AND HAVE OUR YEAR AND SELF-EVALUATION YOURSELVES.
>> GOOD LUCK. WELL NOT TO BE A PART OF SOMETHING WE DO WE HAVE TO KEEP IT. YEAH THERE'S STILL WE CHECK BOARD AVAILABILITY AND
WILLINGNESS OF THE OFFICERS BETTER ON THIS RIGHT? >> I AGREE AND THAT THAT THAT WEEK IN DECEMBER THE WEEK OF THE 14TH IS A IS A.. A WORK WEEK FOR EVERYBODY.
>> RIBAUT DO NOT DO RIGHT. OKAY. SO COLE WHO DETERMINES WHAT
[01:45:10]
DAMON. >> WELL I SET THE AGENDA SETTING MEETING FOR THE EIGHTH
IS THE 30 AT THAT FOUR O'CLOCK HOUR MEETING IS BEFORE THAT. >> SO WE COULD GET OUR ACT TOGETHER ON THE 30TH AND GIVE IT TO WILLIAM TO PRESENT TO THE AGENDA SETTING AT FOUR O'CLOCK . SO NOVEMBER 30TH WE HAVE OUR OUR COMMITTEE MEETING.
WE FINALIZE THE INSTRUMENT. WE FINALIZE THE PROCESS. WE ASK HIM TO PRESENT AT FOUR O'CLOCK THAT AFTERNOON AT THE AGENDA SETTING MEETING FOR INCLUSION ON THE DECEMBER 8 BOARD MEETING. LOOK WHERE WOMEN ARE ACTUALLY HOLDING THAT WEEK.
I CAN DISCUSS THE AGENDA SETTING OF THIS. I CAN JUST TELL HIM THAT THAT WE HAVE SOME ACTION THAT WE'RE READY TO MOVE FORWARD OR INTEND TO PUT ON THE AGENDA FOR THE FULL THE FULL BOARD DISCUSSION . EXACTLY.
WHAT THEY NEED TO KNOW HOW MUCH TIME IT MIGHT TAKE. >> YOU KNOW, THAT'S ALL OUR
INFORMATION. >> OKAY. GOTCHA, GOTCHA, GOTCHA.
>> THAT'S. OKAY. I WANT TO BRING THIS TO THE
BOARD ON DECEMBER 8TH AND THEY SAY ARE BACK TO THE JOB GUYS. >> OUR PLAN.
NO, NO. ONLY YOU AND JOHN WILL BE VOTING ON THIS ONE.
YEAH. ME YOU MAY YOU SOMEBODY ON UP TO DEAR OR WHAT WE COULD DO IS
WE CAN HAVE A MEDIA DETAIL TO GO BACK TO DRAWING BOARD. >> DID WE MEET WE MEET THE FOLLOWING DAY ON THE FOR THE TENTH SO THAT WE CAN GET THAT DONE.
I'LL LEAVE IT THERE AND LET THE VOTE PRINT I IT. OH YEAH.
THEN FAX IT OFFICIAL AS YOU BRING IT BACK TO THE RIGHT. >> OH NO NO.
HEY CONFIDENCE IN THE BOARD B BECAUSE ALL HEY WE SECURED THE HOUSE FLOOR MEMBERS RIGHT THE.
SO ALL WE NEED IS TO A BALL WE CAN SWING THAT AND GRAB YOU AND SLAY YES.
>> THERE YOU GO MAKE SURE YOU CALL YOUR VARIOUS BOARD MEMBER AND THANK EMPLOYERS PARTICIPATION. SO FAR THIS YEAR. YEAH.
>> YEAH. I'D SAY WE'RE GOOD. >> WE'RE GOOD.
DAN WITH THE TASK WAS TO ROB IT . YO YO YO YO.
YOU'RE GOING TO GET US THAT SEVERALLY QUESTION NOW AS QUICK AS YOU CAN.
SO I HAVE TO BE ON BOARD DOUBTS THAT CAN BE BY EMAIL FIRST. YOU KNOW I WILL SEND YOU MY EMAIL ONCE IT'S COMPLETED. ALL RIGHT. THEN.
YEAH. THEN WE'LL GET THE BULLDOGS. THAT'S ALL RIGHT WITH EVERYONE.
YEAH. BUT MY QUESTION SIR ROB WHEN YOU SEND IT TO US FOR ALL
OF YOU YOU'VE ALREADY PUT IT IN OUR SPREADSHEET. >> I'M GONNA PUT IT IN A SPREADSHEET FORM LIKE YOU SUGGESTED SO THAT YOU CAN LOOK AT IT AND SEE IF THAT'S HOW YOU
WILL WIN IT. >> WONDERFUL. THANK YOU.
MAKE A MOTION THAT WIDGER. HAVE A GOOD DAY, EVERYBODY. THANK YOU ALSO.
ALL RIGHT. ARE YOU DO. THANK YOU ALL.
BEING VERY DILIGEN
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.